Error Warning in Cost Distribution XCODI

One employee was eligible for 401 k Contribution last December 2010 and he did his max contribution for this month.
We used Catch up contribution 414V Regular with Catch up Contribution. When we run the payroll for the next payroll
period that is 1 2011.It retroes and the system is throwing a warning in XCODI Schema.
The warning is
Another Liability wage type than /401 for tax type 01 is already configured. When we open the message
another liability wage type, other than /401 (currently processed) for
tax type 01 is already configured in table T52CODIST.
The system creates this message and will ignore this additional
configuration.
Please correct the liabilty wage type assignment in table T52CODIST for
tax type 01. Also ensure that the coresponding account assignment is
maintained in table T7US3PR_TXSYMKO.
Payroll Dept did not want to ignore this message and they are holding the payroll for the payroll area because of this employee.
Experts please can throw some lights on this issue.
Thanks

Hello Chadpal,
I assumed that your issue has been solved by the Pilot note 1555266, if so, could you close this thread?
Thank you,
Graziela

Similar Messages

Error while doing cost distribution

Hi all:
while I am trying to do cost distribution , a message comes that
Cycle DOFF is not valid on 11/01/2008
Message no. GA509
Diagnosis
Cycle DOFF is valid as of the starting date 04/14/2009
System response
This cycle cannot be processed.
Could you please tell me how solve the issue ?
Thank you very much

Hi,
The error is because you have created Cycle DOFF with the starting date 04/14/2009 & you are trying to run the distribution cycle for November 2008.
For which period do you want to run the cycle?
1) If it is for April 2009, then enter the correct period & year when executing the cycle.
2) If it is for November 2008, then you will have to increase the validity of the cycle. I dont think you can change the start date of a cycle. You could however create a new cycle with validity period Nov 2008 to Dec 9999 by copying the cycle DOFF & only changing the start & end date. Then execute this new cycle.
Regards,
Sangeeta

Multiple Account assignment with cost distribution value error

Hello Experts,
We are facing the below issue,
We are trying to create Limit SC with MAA cost center with cost distribution "By Value". we distribute the total value to 5 cost centers. when we try to order the SC, system is not allowing us to order, we got the error message "Multiple account assignment only with percentage less than 100%".
Please advise how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Santhosh Kumar.G

Hi
Check this OSS notes : 1644804
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Travel Cost Distribution

We are having two company codes here, 1000 and 2000. Employees belong
to either of them. If an employee belongs to company code 1000, and he
makes allocation of his cost 100% to a cost centre that belongs to
company code 2000, we are having no problem in posting of expenses.
This we are handling by maintaining the cost centre belonging to 2000,
in the Infotype 17 of that employee.
However with the same employee belonging to comapny code 1000, if he
does cost allocation 50% to his master cost centre which belongs to
company code 1000 and 50% to a cost centre that belongs to company code
2000, we are facing error in posting.
Is this possible in Travel Management or it
is to be handled in FI module manually . If possible in Travel
Management, please help on achieving this

Hi Friends and Guru's,
I have a smilar issue related to travel management assignment of travel cost to different cost centre and different company code more details as below:
We have two company codes 1000 on one COA1 (Chart of Account) and Controlling area COA1 and another company code is on different COA2(Chart of Account) and Controlling Area COA2 and all employees are created in Company code 1000 and we do not have any employees created in Company Code 2000. Issue is business wants to allocate some travel done on 2000 should go to company code 2000, I have tried to change option in Infotype0017 and tried to play around Infotype 0027 subtype 02 cost distribution option no luck for sucess.
I would like to know your expert advice that do i need to create all employees in Company code 2000 and do i need to re-config Travel management along with GL mapping to 2000 or any substitute way to resolve this issue.
Your inputs much appriciated.
Regards,
Srini

Cost distribution on infotype 15

We have our cost distribution assigned to our positions; we do not use IT0027. In some cases, we want certain types of payments to be posted to a specific cost center and fund. We enter these payments on IT0015. When I try to use the maintain cost assignment on the infotype, I get the following message:
"Account assgn Functional Area is active in HR on 09/06/2009 and must therefore contain a value"
The functional area is also set up on the cost distribution at the position level. What are we missing that is preventing us from using this functionality on IT0015?
Thanks in advance for the guidance!!

Thanks.
The functional areas are defined using transaction PO13, infotype 1018, field FKBER.
I removed the cost distribution on the position and left only the account assignment, IT1008, on the position. I tried entering the cost distribution on IT0015 with and without an IT0027, and I receive the same error message as before.

Cost distribution not working for -Ve Transactions

Hi,
We are spliting the cost for an misc transaction. The Splitted cost are got cost distributed. But the Reversal expenditure (-ve Transaction) is not get cost distributed.
The cost distribute flag is enabled for the reversal transaction. but no credit or debit account populated. Please let me know what might be the issue.
Thanks In advance
Thanks
Raj

Check the cost distribution concurrent request's output. It will tell you the reason. It might be an auto-accounting issue too. Post the error code here.
Sathish Raju
www.projectsaccounting.com

Problems with cost distribution "by value"

Hi All,
We have the following problem in cost assignment in shopping cart: We can choose different cost distributions: 1. by percentage; 2. by quantity; 3. by value. When choosing 3 - "by value" and distributing values to different WBS-elements with budget check, system comes up with several error messages saying budget overspend, also we exactly fill in the open budget on theese WBS-elements. The main reason for this seam that our backend system R/3 4.70 just knows the two posibilities 1. - by percentage; 2. by quantity.
Do you guys know a possibility in customizing or elsewhere to deactivare the possibility 3 - by value, since I think back end can not work with this kind of distribution.
Best Regards Thomas

Hi
Do you want to remove the drop down by value in the shoping cart screen ?
BADI - BBP_UI_CONTROL_BADI - method BBP_SC_UI_CTRL field control You may try here
regards
Muthu

Regarding po error:buiding default account distribution and please wait....

hi ,
i 'll appreciate if any one can help me in this:
we have applied patches to our system here OAPPS 11.03,after this whenever i go to create purchase orders or requisitions ..shipment and then distribution ,i am getting error that "BUILDING DEFAULT ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION AND PLEASE WAIT..." but i don't get values for charge,budget,accrual and variance accounts on distribution screen.i checked the wfstatus.sql(account generator workflow file) and run that by giving item_key and item_type for PO,i didn't get any output i.e no rows selected for every activities.Then i used trace on and read the trace file in which i saw one error ORA:00936 which means missing exp(i think) and one wrong sql statement is appearing in trace file.it has comma before from clause..i am not able to understand why is it happening?if any one knows about this then please let me know...is it workflow problem or something else?
thanks in anticipation

Muthu,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Please find below the example:
PO item qty - 100
Cost distribution:
Line 1 - 50
Line 2 - 30
Line 3 - 20
Now the PO has been ordered. PO in backend is showing three account assignments.
After that, I have deleted the fiirst 2 account assignments (1 & 2).
Now the PO will show like:
PO item qty - 100
Cost distribution:
Line 1 - 50 (deleted)
Line 2 - 30 (deleted)
Line 3 - 20
Now the Po item qty and account assignment qty are not same. In this it should give an error. But I am still able to order the PO. When the PO has been transfered to backend, I could see only one account assignment in ME23N but the PO item qty is showing there. Because of that I could able to process confirmation and invoice.
Now, if I change the qty of this specific item, then the new qty is getting updated in teh account assignment tab against the third item.
Rather, if I try to add another item to the PO, then at that time it is giving the error messasge: Sum of quantities > xxx < sum of total quantities.
Till invoice has been posted, it is not giving the error message.
Thanks,
SS

Error found in Software Distribution log

I found below error in my software distribution log. I think it is related to WSUS and many comptuers are not getting proper patches. Any resolution is really appriciated
2014-11-24 15:27:26.773 UTC   Warning   w3wp.325   SoapUtilities.CreateException   ThrowException: actor = http://xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.com:8530/ClientWebService/client.asmx, ID=e5cd4691-63d8-4740-b5a6-f732027896db,
ErrorCode=ConfigChanged, Message=, Client=e78cd58f-cb87-4829-945d-d5ab39d8486d

What do you mean of "not getting proper patches"?
Did these clients fail to update with any error code?
Almost certainly the above log entry is occurring in combination with an 0x8024400D error code ... a very common manifestation of duplicated SusClientIDs.
The log snippet on the client side would look something like this:
2012-02-09 10:02:34:595 948 1994 PT WARNING: SyncUpdates failure, error = 0x8024400D, soap client error = 7, soap error code = 300, HTTP status code = 200
2012-02-09 10:02:34:595 948 1994 PT WARNING: SOAP Fault: 0x00012c
2012-02-09 10:02:34:595 948 1994 PT WARNING:     faultstring:Fault occurred
2012-02-09 10:02:34:595 948 1994 PT WARNING:
ErrorCode:ConfigChanged(2)
2012-02-09 10:02:34:596 948 1994 PT WARNING:     Message:(null)
2012-02-09 10:02:34:596 948 1994 PT WARNING:     Method:"http://www.microsoft.com/SoftwareDistribution/Server/ClientWebService/SyncUpdates"
2012-02-09 10:02:34:596 948 1994 PT WARNING:     ID:6b1c0796-e40b-4800-a3c9-d75624d59acf
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

Infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level

We would like an infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document. The issue seems to be joining vendor to the document cost distribution lines.
1.) BSAK + BSIK can be combined with an infoset data structure but only contain the vendor line of a document; the cost distribution lines are not in the tables.
2.) BSIS + BSAS can be combined with an infoset data structure but lack vendor data and joins (to a vendor source) are not an option with data structures. Vendor data added with an additional field is too slow to be a primary selection field.
3.) Logical data base KDF in an infoset returns only the vendor line of a document, not the cost distribution lines.
4.) Logical data base BRM in an infoset can have vendor from BSAK/BSIK attached by an additional field but performance is too slow to be useful. Joins are not an option in a logical data base infoset.
5.) Complete data is lacking when table joins between document cost distribution tables and vendor data tables are possible, (SPL actual line item table & BSIP or FMIFIIT & FMIFIHD). BSIP lacks AB documents (reversals). FM tables lack general ledger only documents.
6.) BSAK and BSIK together have complete vendor data but joins of both to a basis table do not work well. Left outer joins are too slow, inner joins won’t work since the tables have mutually exclusive data.
It would be ideal to have vendor in BKPF, like FMIFIHD has, but it isn't a field.
Does anyone know of any other options? I have seen the helpful thread on How to Read BSEG Efficiently

Hi,
This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document

We would like an infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document. The issue seems to be joining vendor to the document cost distribution lines.
1.) BSAK + BSIK can be combined with an infoset data structure but only contain the vendor line of a document; the cost distribution lines are not in the tables.
2.) BSIS + BSAS can be combined with an infoset data structure but lack vendor data and joins (to a vendor source) are not an option with data structures. Vendor data added with an additional field is too slow to be a primary selection field.
3.) Logical data base KDF in an infoset returns only the vendor line of a document, not the cost distribution lines.
4.) Logical data base BRM in an infoset can have vendor from BSAK/BSIK attached by an additional field but performance is too slow to be useful. Joins are not an option in a logical data base infoset.
5.) Complete data is lacking when table joins between document cost distribution tables and vendor data tables are possible, (SPL actual line item table & BSIP or FMIFIHD & FMIFIIT). BSIP lacks AB documents (reversals). FM tables lack general ledger only documents.
6.) BSAK and BSIK together have complete vendor data but joins of both to a basis table are not an option. Left outer joins are too slow, inner joins won’t work since the tables have mutually exclusive data.
Does anyone know of any other options?

Hi,
This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Refresh problem in Shopping Cart and PO in cost distribution in SRM 7.0

Hi ,
As of now we are working in SRM 7.0. Actually when we are changing the account assignment cateogary from WBS to Asset then the cost distribution need to be changed from Percentage to quantity and vice-versa. But this is not happening .
Can somebody hlp on this if you guys came across such issue.
Regards,
Kalyani

Kalyani
Cost distribution will not change automatically when you change the account assignment category. You will ve to distribute it manually on the same lines as you did for Cost Center earlier
Regards
VIrender Singh

Error/warning in dict. Activator while activating the infocube

Hi All,
When we are trying to add one of the characteristic info object into Infocube, the system throws following message. deleted the index ,then also same issue.
Activation of Objects with Type InfoCube
Checking Objects with Type InfoCube
Checking InfoCube ZARCFI03
Check of InfoCube ZARCFI03:
InfoCube ZARCFI03 is consistent
Saving Objects with Type InfoCube
Saving InfoCube ZARCFI03
Dimension ZARCFI03P saved
Dimension ZARCFI03T saved
Dimension ZARCFI03U saved
Dimension ZARCFI031 saved
Dimension ZARCFI032 saved
Dimension ZARCFI033 saved
Dimension ZARCFI034 saved
Dimension ZARCFI035 saved
Dimension ZARCFI036 saved
Dimension ZARCFI037 saved
InfoCube ZARCFI03 saved
InfoCube ZARCFI03 saved successfully
Internal Activation (InfoCube )
Preprocessing / Creation of DDIC Objects for InfoCube ZARCFI03
Creation of DDIC Objects:
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI03P saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03P: Index 010 for field SID_0REQUID saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03P: Index 020 for field SID_0RECORDTP saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03P: Index 030 for field SID_0REQUID saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI03T saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03T: Index 010 for field SID_0FISCVARNT saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03T: Index 020 for field SID_0FISCVARNT saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI03U saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03U: Index 010 for field SID_0LOC_CURRCY saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03U: Index 020 for field SID_0DOC_CURRCY saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03U: Index 030 for field SID_0LOC_CURRCY saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI031 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI031: Index 010 for field SID_0COMP_CODE saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI032 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI032: Index 010 for field SID_0CRED_ACCNT saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI032: Index 020 for field SID_0DEBITOR saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI032: Index 030 for field SID_0FI_SUBSID saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI032: Index 040 for field SID_ZCBKTXT saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI032: Index 050 for field SID_0CRED_ACCNT saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI033 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI033: Index 010 for field SID_0DUNN_KEY saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI033: Index 020 for field SID_0LAST_DUNN saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI033: Index 030 for field SID_0DUNN_BLOCK saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI033: Index 040 for field SID_0DUNN_LEVEL saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI033: Index 050 for field SID_0DUNN_KEY saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI034 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI034: Index 010 for field SID_0COUNTRY saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI034: Index 020 for field SID_0REASON_CDE saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI034: Index 030 for field SID_0PYMT_METH saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI034: Index 040 for field SID_0PMNT_BLOCK saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI034: Index 050 for field SID_0PMNTTRMS saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI034: Index 060 for field SID_0COUNTRY saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI035 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI035: Index 010 for field SID_0BLINE_DATE saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI035: Index 020 for field SID_0DSCT_DATE1 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI035: Index 030 for field SID_0DSCT_DATE2 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI035: Index 040 for field SID_0BLINE_DATE saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI036 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI036: Index 010 for field SID_0ACCT_TYPE saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI036: Index 020 for field SID_0CHRT_ACCTS saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI036: Index 030 for field SID_0ACCT_TYPE saved
Dimension Table /BIC/DZARCFI037 saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 010 for field SID_0AC_DOC_NO saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 020 for field SID_0DOC_DATE saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 030 for field SID_0POST_KEY saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 040 for field SID_0SP_GL_IND saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 050 for field SID_0FI_DOCSTAT saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 060 for field SID_0PSTNG_DATE saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 070 for field SID_0REF_DOC_NO saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 080 for field SID_0ALLOC_NMBR saved
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037: Index 090 for field SID_0AC_DOC_NO saved
Fact Table /BIC/FZARCFI03 saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 010 for field KEY_ZARCFI03P saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 020 for field KEY_ZARCFI03T saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 030 for field KEY_ZARCFI03U saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 040 for field KEY_ZARCFI031 saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 050 for field KEY_ZARCFI032 saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 060 for field KEY_ZARCFI033 saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 070 for field KEY_ZARCFI034 saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 080 for field KEY_ZARCFI035 saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 090 for field KEY_ZARCFI036 saved
Table /BIC/FZARCFI03: Index 100 for field KEY_ZARCFI037 saved
Compr.Fact Table /BIC/EZARCFI03 saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 010 for field KEY_ZARCFI03P saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 020 for field KEY_ZARCFI03T saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 030 for field KEY_ZARCFI03U saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 040 for field KEY_ZARCFI031 saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 050 for field KEY_ZARCFI032 saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 060 for field KEY_ZARCFI033 saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 070 for field KEY_ZARCFI034 saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 080 for field KEY_ZARCFI035 saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 090 for field KEY_ZARCFI036 saved
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03: Index 100 for field KEY_ZARCFI037 saved
View /BIC/VZARCFI03T saved
View /BIC/VZARCFI03I saved
View /BIC/VZARCFI03N saved
View /BIC/VZARCFI03J saved
View /BIC/VZARCFI03M saved
View /BIC/VZARCFI03H saved
View /BIC/VZARCFI032 saved
Activate all Dictionary objects ( 19 ):
Error/warning in dict. activator, detailed log --> Detail
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI031
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI031 was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI032
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Index /BIC/DZARCFI032-010 must be converted
Index /BIC/DZARCFI032-050 must be created in the database
/BIC/DZARCFI032: Structure change at field level (DB is adjusted)
Adjust table in DB >>>
sql:
DROP INDEX "/BIC/DZARCFI032~01"
DDL time(___1): ........18 milliseconds
sql:
ALTER TABLE "/BIC/DZARCFI032"
ADD ("SID_0CRED_ACCNT" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL )
DDL time(___1): .......232 milliseconds
<<< Database operations successful
Table : Adjust secondary indexes in the database
sql:
CREATE
INDEX "/BIC/DZARCFI032~05" ON "/BIC/DZARCFI032"
("SID_0CRED_ACCNT")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPDIMI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000000016 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 001)
DDL time(___1): ........42 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/DZARCFI032' AND
INDEXNAME = '050'
DDL time(___2): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE
INDEX "/BIC/DZARCFI032~01" ON "/BIC/DZARCFI032"
("SID_0C_CTR_AREA",
"SID_0DEBITOR",
"SID_0FI_SUBSID",
"SID_ZCBKTXT",
"SID_0CRED_ACCNT")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPDIMI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000000016 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 001)
DDL time(___3): ........27 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/DZARCFI032' AND
INDEXNAME = '010'
DDL time(___4): .........1 milliseconds
<<< Database operations successful
Table /BIC/DZARCFI032 was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI033
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI033 was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI034
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI034 was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI035
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI035 was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI036
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI036 was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI037
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI037 was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI03P
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03P was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI03T
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03T was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/DZARCFI03U
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/DZARCFI03U was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/VZARCFI032
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Field S001_0DEBITOR in table /BIC/VZARCFI032 is specified twice. Please check
Field S002_0DEBITOR in table /BIC/VZARCFI032 is specified twice. Please check
Table /BIC/VZARCFI032 was not activated
Activate table /BIC/VZARCFI03H
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Field H001_0DEBITOR in table /BIC/VZARCFI03H is specified twice. Please check
Field S001_0DEBITOR in table /BIC/VZARCFI03H is specified twice. Please check
Field S002_0DEBITOR in table /BIC/VZARCFI03H is specified twice. Please check
Table /BIC/VZARCFI03H was not activated
Activate table /BIC/VZARCFI03I
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/VZARCFI03I was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/VZARCFI03J
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Table /BIC/VZARCFI03J was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/VZARCFI03M
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Field 0DEBITOR__0COUNTRY in table /BIC/VZARCFI03M is specified twice. Please check
Field 0DEBITOR__0INDUSTRY in table /BIC/VZARCFI03M is specified twice. Please check
Table /BIC/VZARCFI03M was not activated
Activate table /BIC/VZARCFI03N
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Field 0DEBITOR__0COUNTRY in table /BIC/VZARCFI03N is specified twice. Please check
Field 0DEBITOR__0INDUSTRY in table /BIC/VZARCFI03N is specified twice. Please check
Table /BIC/VZARCFI03N was not activated
Activate table /BIC/VZARCFI03T
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Field 0DEBITOR__0COUNTRY in table /BIC/VZARCFI03T is specified twice. Please check
Field 0DEBITOR__0INDUSTRY in table /BIC/VZARCFI03T is specified twice. Please check
Table /BIC/VZARCFI03T was not activated
Activate table /BIC/EZARCFI03
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-P completely contains the fields of index 010
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-010 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-020 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-030 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-040 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-050 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-060 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-070 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-080 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-090 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/EZARCFI03-100 must be created in the database
No data exists (structure change caused by DROP / CREATE)
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03 is modified (Deleted or deleted/created new)
Adjust table in DB >>>
sql:
DROP TABLE "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
DDL time(___1): .......157 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE TABLE "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI03P" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI03T" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI03U" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI031" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI032" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI033" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI034" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI035" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI036" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"KEY_ZARCFI037" NUMBER (000010)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"DEB_CRE_LC" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"DISC_BASE" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"DSC_AMT_LC" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"DEB_CRE_DC" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"DSC_AMT_DC" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"CREDIT_DC" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"CREDIT_LC" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"DEBIT_DC" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"DEBIT_LC" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"NETTAKEN" NUMBER (000017, 000003)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"INT_CALC_1" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"INT_CALC_2" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"INT_CALC_N" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"INT_CALCT1" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"INT_CALCT2" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"INT_CALCTN" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"/BIC/ZVDBCRGR" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"/BIC/ZVCREDGR" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"/BIC/ZVDSC1GR" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"/BIC/ZVDEBTGR" NUMBER (000017, 000002)
DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL)
PCTFREE 10
PCTUSED 00
INITRANS 001
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTD
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000000016 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 001
FREELIST GROUPS 01)
DDL time(___1): ........70 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = ' '
DDL time(___2): .........1 milliseconds
<<< Database operations successful
Table : Adjust secondary indexes in the database
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~010" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI03P")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(___1): ........38 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '010'
DDL time(___2): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~020" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI03T")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(___3): .........9 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '020'
DDL time(___4): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~030" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI03U")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(___5): ........17 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '030'
DDL time(___6): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~040" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI031")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(___7): .........9 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '040'
DDL time(___8): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~050" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI032")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(___9): .........9 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '050'
DDL time(__10): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~060" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI033")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(__11): .........8 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '060'
DDL time(__12): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~070" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI034")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(__13): ........11 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '070'
DDL time(__14): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~080" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI035")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(__15): .........8 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '080'
DDL time(__16): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~090" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI036")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(__17): .........8 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '090'
DDL time(__18): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~100" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI037")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(__19): .........8 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '100'
DDL time(__20): .........1 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE
INDEX "/BIC/EZARCFI03~P" ON "/BIC/EZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI03P",
"KEY_ZARCFI03T",
"KEY_ZARCFI03U",
"KEY_ZARCFI031",
"KEY_ZARCFI032",
"KEY_ZARCFI033",
"KEY_ZARCFI034",
"KEY_ZARCFI035",
"KEY_ZARCFI036",
"KEY_ZARCFI037")
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000000016 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(__21): .........9 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/EZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = 'P'
DDL time(__22): .........1 milliseconds
<<< Database operations successful
Table /BIC/EZARCFI03 was activated with warnings
Activate table /BIC/FZARCFI03
Enhancement category for table missing
Enhancement category for include or subtype missing
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-010 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-020 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-030 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-040 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-050 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-060 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-070 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-080 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-090 must be created in the database
Index /BIC/FZARCFI03-100 must be created in the database
/BIC/FZARCFI03: Structure change at field level (Index is created new)
Adjust table in DB >>>
<<< Database operations successful
Table : Adjust secondary indexes in the database
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/FZARCFI03~010" ON "/BIC/FZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI03P")
LOCAL
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(___1): .....2,718 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/FZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '010'
DDL time(___2): ........11 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/FZARCFI03~020" ON "/BIC/FZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI03T")
LOCAL
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI
STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K
NEXT 0000002560 K
MINEXTENTS 0000000001
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0000
FREELISTS 004)
DDL time(___3): .......848 milliseconds
sql:
DELETE FROM DDSTORAGE WHERE
DBSYSABBR = 'ORA' AND
TABNAME = '/BIC/FZARCFI03' AND
INDEXNAME = '020'
DDL time(___4): .........9 milliseconds
sql:
CREATE BITMAP
INDEX "/BIC/FZARCFI03~030" ON "/BIC/FZARCFI03"
("KEY_ZARCFI03U")
LOCAL
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 002
TABLESPACE PSAPFACTI

closed thread as no response

Cost distribution SRM to R/3 - based on VALUE

Hi all,
We are working on SRM 5.0 and R/3 4.7.,ECS
In shopping cart when the cost dsitirbution is sleected as "VALUE",when the corresponding SRM PO replicates to R/3,the cost distribution always changes to percentage/quantity....Why is that R/3 system recognises the cost distribution only for quantity or percentage???
Also we are now upgrading iur R/3 system to ECC 6.0.Is the above issue resolved in ECC or still persists in ECC 6.0 too???
Has anybody encountered the above issue??Please share experiences.

I am curious as to if you got this resolved. When we upgraded, I was hoping that we would finally get to use distribute by value between SRM and SAP without it converting over to percentages. I have worked with OSS and the discussion forum to come up with a resolution but no luck yet.

Cost distribution in Extended classic scenario

Hi All,
We are in SRM 4.0 using extended classic scenario.
When we create a purchase order with cost distribution, it gets copied to backend system. But the partial invoice field in backend PO is always having the value "Distribution in sequence".
In configuration for account assignment category, it has been defaulted to "Distribute proportionately".
When we checked with SAP they told that for SRM POs it will always be distribute in sequence. It has to be distributed while posting MIRO. This value is hardcoded in SRM PO transfer program. It is very strange and moreover this is a essential functionality which needs to be in SRM.
Any one using extended classic scenario, could you please tell me how you are handling multiple account assignments?
Please help me.
Thanks,
Arun

Friends,
If you are using cost distributions in extended classic scenario, then could you please check and let me know the value that you are getting in the "Partial Invoice" field in Account assignment tab of backend PO.
Please help.
Thanks,
Arun

Error Warning in Cost Distribution XCODI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for