Error while good issue against Asset.

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to issue an equipment using MIGO GI, others and movement type 241 against the asset. The GR has already been done and the equipment system status shows the ESTO which means in stock. Once GI is successful it will show AVAIL INST. I am getting this error which says that the "Deficit of SL Unrestricted-use 1 PC: RW4CK 2911 9507". Here RW4CK is the material and 2911 and 9507 are plant and storage locations. I have checked the equipment status ESTO which clearly shows that the equipment is GRed and it should be there in the storage location. Can any one guide me in solving the problem.
Thanks in advance.
Anoop

Hi
Stock is in quality or unrestricted or blocked? Check it out.
Regards,
Raman

Similar Messages

  • Error while goods issue

    hi sapgurus,
    plz solve my problem
      While goods issue using MIGO system giving this error
      1) G/L account 891000 does not exist in company code 1000
      2) when I created g/l account 891000 using T.Co.FS00 system giving this error
            Account 891000 requires an assignment to CO object.

    Hi
    Please check first the field status of the account in FS00.
    If this account requires CO object as mandatory then check whether a cost element is created or not , this error normally occurs when CO object is mandatory but relevant cost element is not created. CO object can be a cost center.
    go to T code  KA04 and delete the cost elements for your G/L accounts.
    because 891000 is defined as a cost element.
    Put your G/L account as a cost elements there
    Vishal...

  • Dump while doing goods issue against order with movement type 261

    Hi Team,
    We are integrating Asset management process along with the goods issue against the order which is created with a business partner for movement type 261.
    when we try to complete the process the system gives us a dump as described below.
    please look through the dump and advice for the same.
    Short text
        The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.
    What happened?
        The current application program detected a situation which really
        should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was
        triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).
    Error analysis
        Short text of error message:
        System error in the FI/CO interface
        Long text of error message:
         Diagnosis
             Updating of the FI/CO interface was called with object type "MKPF"
             yet the checks were run for object type "AMBU".
         System Response
             Checking and updating must be for the same object type.
         Procedure
             It has to do with a system error from the calling applications.
        Technical information about the message:
        Message class....... "RW"
        Number.............. 103
        Variable 1.......... "MKPF"
        Variable 2.......... "AMBU"
       Variable 3.......... " "
       Variable 4.......... " "
    rigger Location of Runtime Error
       Program                                 SAPLMBWL
       Include                                 LMBWLU21
       Row                                     62
       Module type                             (FUNCTION)
       Module Name                             MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT
    46    IF xmkpf-xabln IS INITIAL.                               "note 434093
    47        CALL FUNCTION 'MB_XAB_NUMBER_GET'.                   "note 434093
    48    ENDIF.                                                   "note 434093
    49
    50 ENHANCEMENT-POINT MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENTS_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLMBWL STATIC.
    51
    52 ENHANCEMENT-POINT MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENTS_02 SPOTS ES_SAPLMBWL.
    53    CALL FUNCTION 'MB_CREATE_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_UT'
    54         EXCEPTIONS
    55           error_message = 4.
    56 *  As soon as we have started to put things into UPDATE TASK, we must
    57 *  ensure that errors definitely terminate the transaction.
    58 *  MESSAGE A is not sufficient because it can be catched from
    59 *  external callers which COMMIT WORK afterwards, resulting in
    60 *  incomplete updates. Read note 385830 for the full story.
    61    IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
    >>>       MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE x NUMBER sy-msgno WITH            "385830
    63                  sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
    64 *     MESSAGE A263.
    65    ENDIF.
    66 * Optische Archivierung
    67 * Spaete Erfassung mit Barcode
    68 * Redesign of barcode handling -> note 780365
    69   PERFORM barcode_update(sapmm07m) USING xmkpf-mblnr
    70                                          xmkpf-mjahr
    71                                          barcode.
    72
    73   MOVE-CORRESPONDING xmkpf TO emkpf.
    74   CALL FUNCTION 'MB_MOVEMENTS_REFRESH'
    75     EXCEPTIONS
    76       error_message = 4.
    77    MOVE-CORRESPONDING xmkpf TO emkpf.
    ource Code Extract
    ine  SourceCde
      32 *    BKPF as well. There is no other way to forward XBLNR to FI as not
      33 *    every document is posted by MB_CREATE -> a new function module in
      34 *    MBWL for transferring the information, called by FI, meant to load
      35 *    the complete function group for all MBxx postings when this isn't
      36 *    required (Performance). Would be the better way to transport the
      37 *    information after switching off MBxx in later release.
      38 *    corresponding IMPORT ... FROM MEMORY ... can be found in
      39 *    AC_DOCUMENT_POST (FORM FI_DOCUMENT_PREPARE (LFACIF5D))
      40      l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'.                                   " 641365
      41      EXPORT xblnr = xblnr_sd TO MEMORY ID l_mem_id.             " 641365
      42    ELSE.                                                        "1245374
      43      l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'.                                   "1245374
      44      FREE MEMORY ID l_mem_id.                                   "1245374
      45    ENDIF.

    Couple of notes are mentioned (385830, 780365 etc) and check whether these notes are applied.  If so, check with the ABAPer and go through the source code corrections explained in the respective notes.
    You may also go through the following notes
    1)  Note 386656 - FBV4: RW103 'System error in the FI/CO interface'
    2)  Note 388316 - RW103 "System error in the FI/CO interface"
    3) Note 543463 - Inconsistent Posting in budgetary ledger and/or RW102/RW103
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • POST GOODS ISSUE AGAINST RESERVATIONS

    Dear All,
    I want to restrict the goods issue against the manual reservations.
    Logic:At the time of goods issue against the reservation system should check stock in hand(unrestricted stock)-all previous reservations.
    Eg:suppose unrestricted stock is 50kg
    Reservation 1 for 20 kg
    Reservation 2 for 30 kg
    Reservation 3 for 40 kg
    Reservation 4 for 10 kg
    When i do goods issue for Res :3
    System should check Uns Stock(50kg)-Previous Res(20kg+30kg)
    give error message stock insufficient.
    Waiting for the expert comment.
    Kind Regards,
    Sankar T

    Hi
       Let me tell you with that logic reservation works.
    While creating manual reservation, system checks whether material is available on specified date or not. In case material is available then system will allow to reserve the material otherwise not.
        Now take your case, if you have made following reservations
    1) 20 Kg
    2) 30 Kg
    3) 40 Kg
    4) 10 Kg
    This means against each reservation material will always be available for particular reservation (because no one can issue particular material by any other means)
    Now suppose in unrestricted use 50 kg of material is available and you want to issue the material against reservation No 3 then system will issue material from reserved material (Not from the un restricted use)
       This means the logic which you want to use is already applied by SAP in one step before (while creating reservation) so need not to apply same logic once again.
       and if you still want to use this logic , you take a help of ABAPer , he only can help you in this mater
    Reward if helpful

  • Error while creating a new asset in BCC.

    Getting below errors while creating a new asset(catalog/category) through BCC. I have imported the required data from CIM and install.bat from BIZUI.
    /atg/dynamo/servlet/sessiontracking/GenericSessionManager/KDzDSgGcJTS9nwvGpkr9wpyz4nnGKWPYs4QFFJ87Q1BjrTSd4JTG!1759330809!1386235100684
    atg.web.viewmapping.ItemMappingException: Invalid Mapping Mode: AssetManager.default
    [Flex Messaging] 12/05/2013 14:50:45.486 [ERROR] [Message.Remoting] Error processing remote invocation: atg.flex.service.RemoteOperationException: java.lang.NullPointerException
    Kindly suggest...

    As u imported data from CIM for production and publishing(assuming u imported for both), There is no need to run BIZUI.bat mannually, CIM runs this.
    Coming to ur error:
    From the logs  it seems that following mapMode is missing, It's OOTB and should have been loaded while Viewmapping repository data load.
    <add-item item-descriptor="mapMode" id="AmMmDef">
      <set-property name="name"><![CDATA[AssetManager.default]]></set-property>
    </add-item>
    I think there must have been problems during CIM data for publishing environment loading and because of that viemmapping is not loaded properly.
    Refer to this post for initial data load : Re: ATG ENVIRONMENT SETUP ISSUE
    Let us know if u didn't load publishing using CIM, there is some manual work required to load some repository.
    Thanks,
    Nitin.

  • Error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation scenario. Please help me to fix this issue.
    Tax code V1 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
    Message no. FF713
    Diagnosis
    You entered a tax code which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
    System Response
    Procedure
    Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
    Procedure for System Administration
    If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    Check whether the company code is assigned to the correct country and whether the correct tax calculation procedure has been entered for the company code country.
    Create a new tax code if necessary.
    Caution:
    Since it is possible that the tables in question are being updated at a different time on another computer, it can take a certain amount of time for the tax code to be on all local machines in client server architectures after saving the new code.
    Thanks
    KB

    Hi,
    you need to maintain Tax Code A0 & V0 in t.code OBCL t.code.
    and also ensure to check whether you have created tax code V1 or not in FTXP t.code. If not, create V1 tax code and assign GL on that in the right Transaction event keys in OB40.
    Try.... if not working let me know....
    Regards,
    MOhan.

  • Rounding while goods receipt against outbound delivery

    Hi Experts,
    I have an issue regarding alternative unit of measure.
    Material with base unit of measure FT,ordered unit is Meters since the alternate unit of measure has conversion factor getting decimal places while goods receipt against outbound delevry.
    Is it possible to round off to nearest figure without decimals.At what level means PO,delivery,GR how we can round off.please advice with customization.
    Thank you very much for your help.
    Regards,
    Babu
    9930154536

    it is not possible to rounding of stock while  GR through customizaton settings.
    abap development is required to round off the stock.

  • Post a good issue against an outbound delivery with movement type 601 K

    Hello,
    according to my business scenario I need to manage the stock of different vendors into the client's location (plant) at storage location level and I need to post the good issue against an outbound delivery to decrease the stock level.
    Since the owner of the goods isn't my client the item is managed only at quantity level (not value) so I'm not interesed in the accounting document.
    To do it I'm using the functionality related to the vendor consignment stock but I'm not able to post the good issue against an outbound delivery using the movemement type 601 and the special stock indicator equal to K.
    In particular I've tried in two different ways:
    - setup the consignment stock indicator (= K) into the sales item category, but when I post the goods issue the system is not able to find out the right vendor
    - to create a stock determination rule instead of the setting previous described, but the system display an error message (Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct L534200770 differs for Cost center (010) ) even if the accouting is not relevant in my scenario
    Can you suggest me how the system has to be setup in order to cover my requirements?
    Thanks in advance,
    Alessandro

    Hi,
    Please clarrify which material type you are using in this scenario? I suggest you to use material type UNBW (no value updation will be there) and create a material master.  Use special stock indicator K. Proceed with 601K to do GI. Hope it works. Thanking you.

  • Account Detrmination for Goods Issue against Order

    Dear All,
    We have a requirement where goods issued against reservation created through plant maintenance order should hit repairs & maintenance account instead of default account such as consumption stores and spares.
    Can any changes be made in configuration so that the default account can be changed either while saving plant maintenance order or can the default be overwritten when material is issued through MB1A against reservation.
    Useful answers will be rewarded with points
    Regards
    Milind Nair

    Dear
    Your knowldge iam adding the points
    In materail master check the Valuation class 4 digits (ex: 2010)
    is assigned in material master . The same material will be used in many places , this valaution class depends Production created by Fi.
    This same will have assigned in G/L at OBYC t code. Here we assign as automatic posting. The same G/l account has given as automatic posting in G/L t code FS00.
    In obyc has many process example for goods issue it will come as BSX. costing difference PRD.
    your materails type is ERSA these types may bes used many plcaes other than Pm . If clinet interests you can assign valuation class with seperate G/l account for PM
    All the G/L , costing docuemnts will appear while doing migo (mb1a) 261 movements as per your obyc seetings
    Tell requirements with FI/MM

  • Error during goods issue-Posting period not open

    Hi ,
    I am getting an error during goods issue which says posting period not open.I guess that we have had deliveries that were created and in process while crossing over from one financial period to another quite frequently before, but we were still able to goods issue them in the next period. Can anyone tell me why this error happens and if there is any work around for this?
    Thanks,
    Hari.

    Hi,
    Goods issue takes place, say on a given date and this should be updated, so that the plant valuation changes are recorded. But the periods need to opened to do this. Normally there are two posting periods available, one is in MM, done by t.code MMPV and the other in FI, t.code is OB52.
    So, in MMPV we need have the current month as the posting period. But in your case it was allowing, probably because you have marked the indicator " allow posting in previous period " in MMRV t.code as our friend just conveyed.
    Hope it helps. Please reward if useful.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sadhu Kishore

  • Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

    Hello gurus,
    We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
    I will explain the business requirement.
    - We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
    - This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
    - Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed.  For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this.  This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit".  This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
    - During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
    Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue.  We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
    Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
    Thanks in advance

    Hi RJ,
    First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
    AS - IS
                   Business process
              From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
    e.g.
    Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
    Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
    Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
    Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
    Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40  Unit
    Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
    1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty  to (60+40) =100 or
    2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
    Pros & Cons
    if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
    if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
    Solution ::
    so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
    Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
    if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
    At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
    Hope this help

  • Goods Issue against outbound delivery from blocked stock

    Dear All
    I want to do goods issue against outbound delivery created without any reference from blocked stock of my storage location. Is there any way I can achieve this? I know normally SAP allows goods issue from unrestricted stock but my business scenario requires goods issue to be done from blocked stock against outbound delivery.
    Please let me know any solution for this.
    Thanks and Regards
    Satish Kumar

    Hi
    Check this link where similar issue has discussed and its resolved as well. Please try this and update the findings. If possible could you share the background of this strange requirement.
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/1541911
    Thank$

  • GOODS ISSUE AGAINST GRN NO.

    Hello
    Can we do Goods Issue against the GRN No. ???
    Regards
    Jay
    Moderator message: locked because of violating forum rules - please read the rules before posting. Subject must not be in capital letters only
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Feb 22, 2012 3:31 PM

    Hi,
    No you can not do a goods issue against a GRN.
    Goods iisue will be done against a account assignment like order, cost center, scrap, delivery etc .
    Regards,

  • Goods issue against reservation with interchangeable part using MB11/MIGO

    Hi
    Do anyone know how to make a goods issue against reservation with interchangeable part using MB11/MIGO.
    Meaning reservation is made with Part A,  goods issue is make with Part B (interchangeable to part A).
    Enhancement pack 4 is having some issue with MB1A, we are attempting to do a work around with MB11 / MIGO.
    Please assist.
    Thanks!!
    Regards,
    Clarice

    You can view report from MB25 ,it will gives you reservation list with reference network  number.
    Select option in MIIGO  as GI > Reservation > Mvt.281.  or you can make the entry from MB1A  with Mvt .type-281
    Regards,
    Sandesh Sawant

  • Excess goods issue against Production order

    HI PP Gurus,
    My requirement is to block excess goods issue of raw material against a production order.
    Ex. Production order qty = 10 , For producing 10 Finish goods i require 10 raw material. When i do confirmation via CO11N  the system automatically shows GR & GI Values in Goods Movement tab. there i change GI value of RM from 10 to 20 the system takes the value and does the GR & GI.
    My requirement is that the system should not do GR & GI if the GI value is more than that is calculated at the time of creation of Prod. Order.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Deven

    Hi,
    Rstriction of excess goods issue against production order is not possible in standard setting.
    For achiving this you have to go for User exit.
    The logic should be
    In MIGO check mvt. type 261
    Pass the order through table RESB and select all the components with quantity.
    Capture the header material of order and use this as input along with the order creation date, plant and BOM application to explode function module CS_BOM_EXPLOSION.
    THis will give you the BOM components which were valid at the time of order creation.
    Now compare these BOM components with the components from RESB with quantity.
    Here conditions will come in picture
    If quantity is exactly matching then GI will be possible
    or if you want to keep tolerance limit say for 10% then accordingly you can map the condition.
    Regards
    Amit Parkhi

Maybe you are looking for