ESTK ignores try/catch during debugging

When running under photoshop, try/catch error doesn't stop execution (has it should).
Not as when running under ESTK for debugging.On ESTK, try/catch is ignored and the error doesn't catch for debug.
I'm using ESTK 4.0.0.1 under CC2014 on windows7

For example, I use this to get annotations on an image document on photoshop.
Running from ESTK it breaks on try/catch
function getAnnotationCount () { 
    var index = 0; 
    while (hideAnnotation (index)) { 
        index++; 
    return index; 
    function hideAnnotation (index) {
        var exists = true; 
        var desc = new ActionDescriptor (); 
        var ref = new ActionReference (); 
        ref.putIndex (stringIDToTypeID ('annotation'), index); 
        desc.putReference (stringIDToTypeID ('target'), ref); 
        try { 
            executeAction (stringIDToTypeID ('hide'), desc, DialogModes.NO);  // the error here
        } catch (e) { exists = false; }     
        return (exists); 

Similar Messages

  • ExtendScript try/catch difference when script ran from ESTK and Illustrator

    Hello,
    I've written an ExtendScript for Illustrator using the ExtendScript ToolKit (ESTK).  This scripts works really well when running it in Illustrator from the ESTK (using the target application functionality).
    However when I run it directly within Illustrator (by selecting it from the dropdown File > Scripts) I get a run time error.  Is this normal?  Should I expect differences when running the script in these two different ways?
    The error is in this function...
    ```
    function itemUsable (arr, item) {
        var usable = true;
        try {
            arr[item];
            usable = true;
        } catch(e) {
            $.global.alert(e);
            usable = false;
        return usable;
    ```
    The point of the code is to get around Illustrator's issue of throwing errors when accessing properties that don't always exist.  Ran from ESTK the try/catch statement catches the error "No such element" and then sets the function to return false.
    When ran directly from Illustrator the error message fires but the try/catch doesn't seem to stop the script from exiting.
    The only difference I can see is when running the script from ESTK the dropdown menu next to the application target dropdown is always (and has only the option) "main".  Running the script directly from Illustrator, when the error is thrown this dropdown option is set to the value "transient".
    See this screenshot for an example what I mean
    Any help would be much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    /t

    Thanks Trevor.
    So it turns out that a script executed in Illustrator from ExtendScript has a different debug mode compared to a script that is opened directly by Illustrator.  Useful to know.

  • Breakpoints not caught during debugging in BEA Workshop 8.1 (Win7 Pro OS)

    Hi all,
    As of the moment, we're slowly making our migration from our existing WebLogic 8.1 Platform to the newer WebLogic 12c. Some people in my team are starting to use Windows 7 Professional for the WL8.1 (which includes the application server and the developer IDE, "Workshop").
    Been using and debugging myself on my own Windows 7 Home Edition laptop. Haven't been encountering problems, but lately, those of us using Windows 7 Pro are not able to catch breakpoints during debugging. I tried it on a separate machine running Win 7 Pro as well with my same domain settings and all, and I confirm that the breakpoints aren't caught. How is this so? If I recall, the latest service pack for WL8.1 is SP6; are there any other patches that we need to install to resolve this?
    I'm looking at the possibility of having to use Win7's "XP mode" if there are no options. But it'd be better if we can avoid that altogether... Thanks!

    David,
    Can you try passing in the 1.5 VM location manually as listed below
    WorkshopInstaller.exe LAX_VM d:\bea\9server\jdk150_04\bin\java.exe
    Can you also make sure that the 1.5 JVM value entry is the first entry in the PATH environment variable.
    cheers
    Raj

  • Break points set in an included script during debugging sporadically jump to the last line of the included script

    As I stated in the title, I use the ScriptInclude command quite extensively, because we have at our company a policy of maintaining one large-ish (roughly 7k lines) function library which is included by various individual evaluation scripts. Debugging this with break points is often the only (useful) way to see into the state of the script, so I depend on them.
    My problem is that often when I debug a script calling the function library, setting a break point in that library and running into it during debug mode will not transport the cursor to the location of the current break point, but instead to the very end of the included script. I have noticed this with a separate pair of scripts, as well, which includes a similar size script to call functions from (roughly 2k lines).
    Now I wonder if this has to do with the size of the scripts included, or if it is dependent on something else. It seems to not be affected by restarting DIAdem, and sometimes it works as intended, but I have not been able to reliably replicate indivdual occurrences one way or the other.
    Has anyone else had this problem happen to them?
    Leo Zschokke
    Test Engineer C-EPS
    ThyssenKrupp Presta AG

    Leo
    I also use scriptincludes extensively, Most of mine are in the range of 500 to 2000 lines.  Usually I organize them in logical code topics,  I like to use them to hold one class most of the time.  When I debug these I can set a breakpoint, and it will stop at that location.
    I also use custom log class as well, I find this quite helpful, in the applications that are unattended.
    The only thing I can think of to try is to separate the 7k file into 2 2k line files and then script include them separately.
    Paul
    ps. I sometimes need to have intellisense work from a file that was scriptincluded, this requires copying the file into the end of the main script.  (you most likely already know this   )
    One other note, Are you talking about debuging code in a SUD, that is whole different problem to deal with.

  • How to get the returned error messages in the Try/Catch block in DS 3.0?

    A customer sent me the following questions when he tried to implement custom error handling in DS 3.0. I could only find the function "smtp_to" can return the last few lines of trace or error log file but this is not what he wants. Does anyone know the answers? Thanks!
    I am trying to implement the Try/Catch for error handling, but I have
    hard time to get the return the msg from DI, so I can write it to out
    custom log table.
    Can you tell me or point me to sample code that can do this, also, can
    you tell me which tables capture these info if I want to query it from
    DI system tables

    Hi Larry,
    In Data Services XI 3.1 (GAd yesterday) we made several enhancements for our Try/Catch blocks. One of them is the additional of functions to get details on the error that was catched :
    - error_message() Returns the error message of the caught exception
    - error_number() Returns the error number of the caught exception
    - error_timestamp() Returns the timestamp of the caught exception.
    - error_context() Returns the context of the caught exception. For example, "|Session Datapreview_job|Dataflow debug_DataFlow|Transform Debug"
    In previous versions, the only thing you could do was in the mail_to function specify the number of lines you want to include from the error_log, which would send the error_log details in the body of the mail.
    Thanks,
    Ben.

  • Can we have try/catch in a static block in a class?

    hi All
    i have a question about put a try/catch block in a static block in a class to catch exceptions that maybe thrown from using System.xxxx(). in my custom class, i have a static block to initialize some variables using System.xxx(). in case of any error/exception, i need to be able to catch it and let the caller know about it. i tried to put a try/catch block in the static block, and tried to rethrow the exception. but it is not allowed, how would i handle situation like this? thanks for your help and advise in advance.

    You could just swallow the exception inside try/catch
    block, and instead of throwing it out, just set a
    static variable to allow checking from outside
    whether the initialization succeeded, or check within
    the constructor / methods of this class for
    successful initialization, and throw the exception
    then. You could even save that exception in a static
    variable for later.Ouch, ouch, you're hurting my brain. This would allow someone to ignore a (presumably) fatal error. Throw a RuntimeException as indicated. You can wrap a checked exception in an unchecked one if need be.

  • Try/catch and 'cannot resolve symbol'

    I am relatively new to java programming and something has me puzzled...
    Why do I get a 'cannot resolve symbol' message when I include a variable definition in a try/catch section. When I put it/them before the 'try' statement it compiles as expected. How are statements inside a try compiled differently than those outside?
    try {
        StringBuffer pageBuffer = new StringBuffer();
        String inputLine;
        BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(
           new InputStreamReader( theURL.openStream() ) );
        while ((inputLine = in.readLine()) != null) {
             System.out.println(inputLine);
            pageBuffer.append(inputLine);
        in.close();
    } catch (Exception ignored) {}C:\Projects\WebExplorer\PageVisitor.java:142: cannot resolve symbol
    symbol : variable pageBuffer
    location: class PageVisitor
         return pageBuffer.toString();
    Paul

    A try block is just like any other block delimited by {...} in that all variables declared inside it are local to that block. I.e. they are not visible or usable anywhere outside it. Your pageBuffer variable, for example, is a local variable that can only be used inside the try-block in which it is declared.
    Your obvious solution, knowing that, is to declare the variables outside the try and catch blocks. Remember to initialize them (even to null), otherwise the compiler will complain about variables that may not have been initialized.

  • How to know if a UDF form is opened else then using a TRY CATCH ?

    I'm looking for any way to find out if the UDF form is visible
    else then trying to open it in a try catch and if it's not sending a key.  This if very ugly, slow and not really my kind.
    I tried to iterate through all the forms in SBO_Application.Forms but it's not there.  All I see is the main form
    I just need to make sure the UDF form is visible when Inventory form is loaded so I can put a value in one of the UDF
    If there's a better way I'm buying it

    Hi Marc,
    Rather than putting your data in the UDF in the UDF side form, you can add a control to the main form (during the load event of the form) and bind this to the UDF through the DBDataSource that is already available on the main form. This means that you don't need to worry about whether the UDF form is open or not because you can always read or write to your UDF data from the main form.
    Alternatively, the UDF form TypeEx property is always the same as the main form but with a minus sign in front. Therefore, if you know the TypeEx and FormTypeCount of the main form then you can use the GetForm method of the Application object to get the UDF form.
    oForm = _sboApp.Forms.GetForm("-" + oMainForm.TypeEx, oMainForm.TypeCount);
    You'd still need a try/catch around this and if it raises an error then activate the 6913 menu to open the UDF form.
    Kind Regards,
    Owen

  • Try  Catch problem CS6

    All my try catch scripts don't work on CS6
    $.strict = false;
    function myGetScriptPath() {
    try{
    return app.activeScript;
    catch(myError){
    return File(myError.fileName);
    myGetScriptPath()
    Can anyone tell me the problem?
    Thanks
    Trevor

    Thanks for trying Pickory,
    I have Windows 7, with both indesign CS5 and creative cloud CS6 installed
    After experimenting I found that the script works fine on the machine with just CS5 on it.
    But on the one that has both doesn't work when called from either version of the ESTK but does from either version of indesign.
    When I try run the script from the CS5 ESTK It automatically opens and runs from the CS6 ESTK.
    I am not keen on uninstalling the CS5 ESTK as I don't know how long I'll keep creative cloud.
    Bellow is a alternative try catch script because the above one will not invoke an error if run from indesign so it won't call the catch.
    cs = app.activeDocument.characterStyles.item("myCharacterStyleName");
    try {alert ("Try $.strict = " +$.strict); myCharacterStyle.name}
    catch (myError) { alert ("Catch $.strict = " +$.strict + "\r" + myError)}
    I'm quite desperate for an answer.

  • Nested try-catch blocks

    Hello All,
    If I have 2 nested try-catch blocks see below
    try{
        //Some code
        try{
            //Code that throws an IOException
        }catch(NumberFormatException nfe){
            //Handle the NFE
    }catch(Exception e){
        //Handle the Exception
    }Now what happens if in the inner try-catch an IOException is thrown? Will it be ignored, or will it get thrown out to the outer one and be caught by that catch?
    Thanks,
    Matt

    Thanks, should have just done this from the start, but here is the result...
    The following code
    public class Main {
         public void execute(){
              try{
                  try{
                       for(int i=0;i<100;i++){
                            System.out.println(i);
                            if(i==5){
                                 throw new java.io.IOException();
                  }catch(NumberFormatException nfe){
                     System.out.println("caught in inner block");
              }catch(Exception e){
                  //Handle the Exception
                 System.out.println("caught in outer block");
         public static void main(String[] args) {
              Main m = new Main();
              m.execute();
    }GENERATES:
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    caught in outer block
    Thanks,
    Matt

  • Need HELP with finally() in nested try-catch

    hi,
    i am having trouble with deadlock and wondering if its due to an incorrect use of finally nested within multiple try catch blocks.
    is the inner finally() required, will the outer one get executed, or will the two finally() statements get executed...??
    the deadlock happens very infrequently to accurately test.
    try {
         try {
         catch (InterruptedException e) {
              return;
    catch {
    finally {
         //will this be executed be executed by the inner throw statement
    }or is an inner finally required
    try {
         try {
         catch (InterruptedException e) {
              return;
         //this finally is NEW....is it needed!
         finally {
              //will this be executed. will both get executed
    catch {
    finally {
         //will this be executed also, or completely ignored if exception throw from inner try/catch
    }

    inner/outer, which one is executed first?
    more info pls.I mean, really. How hard is it to find out for yourself?
    public class TestFinally {
        public static void main(String[] args) {
            try {
                try {
                    throw new RuntimeException("Whatever");
                } finally {
                    System.out.println("Inner finally");
            } finally {
                System.out.println("Outer finally");
    }I'll leave it to your imagination as to how to modify this class to confirm the answers to your original question.

  • Try-catch, new to java

    Anyone know how to effectivly exit a try catch statement if the exception is thrown? Heres this code I'm working with:
    public void create(){
         textCheck1 = textField1.getText();
         try{
           intCheck = Integer.parseInt(textCheck1);
         catch(IllegalArgumentException nfe) {
           System.out.println("NumberFormatException: Level must be a number between 1-70");
         if(intCheck>70){
             throw new NumberFormatException("NumberFormatException: Level must be a number between 1-70");
         else{
           TextArea.setText("Character Successfully Created");
           if(button1.isSelected()){
           System.out.println("Character: \n"+"Name: "+textField2.getText()+"\n"+"Job: "+box.getSelectedItem()+"\n"+"Level: "+textField1.getText()+"\n"+"Gender: Male"+"\n"+"Heroic: "+checkBox.isSelected()+"\n");
           else if(button2.isSelected()){
           System.out.println("Character: \n"+"Name: "+textField2.getText()+"\n"+"Job: "+box.getSelectedItem()+"\n"+"Level: "+textField1.getText()+"\n"+"Gender: Male"+"\n"+"Heroic: "+checkBox.isSelected()+"\n");
        }the way this is set up, when the catch block throws the exception the if-else executes anyway and the results are printed. If the string isn't formated correctly I want to throw the exception and exit the method. please help. thanks.

    cyberjed1 wrote:
    try{
    intCheck = Integer.parseInt(textCheck1);
    catch(IllegalArgumentException nfe) {
    System.out.println("NumberFormatException: Level must be a number between 1-70");
    }the way this is set up, when the catch block throws the exception the if-else executes anyway and the results are printed. If the string isn't formated correctly I want to throw the exception and exit the method. please help. thanks.Two flaws:
    1) You're catching IllegalArgumentException instead of NumberFormatException. The catch would never be entered.
    2) You're ignoring/swallowing the exception and doing a 'dumb' sysout instead of throwing the (new) exception.
    Fix your code as follows:
    try{
        intCheck = Integer.parseInt(textCheck1);
    } catch (NumberFormatException nfe) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("NumberFormatException: Level must be a number between 1-70");
    } Exactly the way as you did in the subsequent if block.
    By the way, if you consider yourself new to Java, why don't you make use of the 'New to Java' forum? Here we expect a bit more from you.

  • Try/catching errors occuring in synchronous event handlers

    Hi,
    I know that using try/catch in flash player it is possible to catch only synchronous errors, but recently I ran into code in our application which I strongly believe is synchronous but it behaves as if it wasn't.
    In example below I create event listener and inside try/catch I dispatch event. Handler function throws error. Executing code stops when error is thrown, so message "after throwing error" won't be logged, but try/catch block catches nothing and code executes as if nothing happened after event dispatch.
    Dispatching event on element executes handler method immediately so it is synchronous execution. Event call stack which is displayed in debug versions of flash player, shows every function from creation of class to execution of handler.
    Generally flash applications relays heavily on events and in my case it caused ours users projects to be irreversibly corrupted, because of this continuing to work after error, which I even can't properly detect and handle, cause it's going throught 5 or more event handlers and adding try/catch to each handler would create enormous chaos in my code. So my question is why does flash player behaves like this? Are there any ways to tell compiled SWF file to treat such cases as synchronous calls, f.e. compilation parameters?
    package
        import flash.display.Sprite;
        import flash.events.Event;
        import flash.events.EventDispatcher;
        import flash.text.TextField;
        public class TestApp extends Sprite
            public var cTextField:TextField;
            public function TestApp()
                cTextField = new TextField();
                cTextField.width = 300;
                cTextField.height = 200;
                addChild(cTextField);
                onAppCreated();
            protected function onAppCreated():void
                var eventName:String = "my_event";
                var caughtError:Boolean = false;
                var dispatcher:EventDispatcher = new EventDispatcher();
                dispatcher.addEventListener(eventName, handler);
                try
                    dispatcher.dispatchEvent(new Event(eventName));
                } catch (error:Error)
                    caughtError = true;
                cTextField.text += caughtError ? "caught error\n" : "error wasn't caught\n";
            protected function handler(event:Event):void
                cTextField.text += "before throwing error\n";
                throw new Error("throw error");
                cTextField.text += "after throwing error\n";

    Okay, nobody bit.  Sorry. 
    The only way to really figure out what is going on is to look at a running example with a C++ debugger.  I'm particularly curious about whether this problem happens in a specific browser/os combination (we may be working around a quirk of that platform), or if it's something that happens everywhere.
    The most effective way to proceed is going to be to file a bug with a simplified, executable example (source and compiled SWF, ideally) that demonstrates the problem.  This will help me route the bug to a developer and get you an answer in the shortest time possible. 
    You can file a bug here:
    http://bugbase.adobe.com/
    If you reply here with the bug number, I'll get it assigned to an engineer.
    Thanks!

  • JSPC try/catch size limitations , work-arounds ?  CR094190

    Hi Folks:
              When a problem occurs during JSPC Compilation because of the size of the generated
              try/catch block, are there any suggestions or patches?
              As I was typing this, a colleague stopped by and said there are patches for this under
              CR094190. Instead of aborting the message, I figured this would be more useful.
              Wayne Scott
              Liberty Corner, NJ
              

              U can move some of the codes to the new jsp and u can include the new jsp in
              your original one.What i mean is that spit your JSP and use include tag. and
              run.
              Thanks
              "Wayne W. Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >Hi Folks:
              >
              >When a problem occurs during JSPC Compilation because of the size of
              >the generated
              >try/catch block, are there any suggestions or patches?
              >
              >As I was typing this, a colleague stopped by and said there are patches
              >for this under
              >CR094190. Instead of aborting the message, I figured this would be more
              >useful.
              >
              >Wayne Scott
              >Liberty Corner, NJ
              >
              

  • PowerShell - Remote Sessions, Try{}Catch{}, ErrorActionPreference

    Hello everyone,
    I am encountering issues with Remote Exchange sessions and was wondering what I am overlooking/over-complicating.
    I am running Windows 8.1/PowerShell 4.0. Reason I mention this is because of this blog post:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/powershell/archive/2013/10/25/windows-management-framework-4-0-is-now-available.aspx
    The IMPORTANT section noted that Exchange 2007, 2010, 2013 are not compatible with WMF 4.0 and didn't know if that is good/bad since the OS is using PowerShell 4.0.
    1 - I am connecting to Office 365 utilizing the following:
    http://help.outlook.com/en-us/140/cc952755.aspx
    2 - I have the following function:
    function Get-SomeMailboxStatistics {
    [CmdletBinding()]
    param(
    [Parameter(Mandatory=$True,
    ValueFromPipeline=$True,
    HelpMessage="Identities or aliases to gather Exchange Statistics from.")]
    [Alias('Username')]
    [string[]]$Identity,
    [string]$ErrorLog = 'C:\MbxStatsErrorLog.txt',
    [switch]$LogErrors
    BEGIN{}
    PROCESS{
    Write-Verbose "Beginning..."
    foreach ($alias in $Identity)
    Write-Verbose "Gathering info for $alias."
    #trap [ManagementObjectNotFoundException] {$everythingOK = $false}
    Try{
    # $ErrorActionPreference = "Stop" # Testing purposes.
    $everythingOK = $true
    $gms = Get-MailboxStatistics -Identity $alias -ErrorAction Stop # http://technet.microsoft.com/library/hh847884.aspx
    # Trap {
    # throw $_
    Catch{
    $everythingOK = $false
    Write-Warning "Lookup on $alias failed."
    if ($LogErrors -eq $true){
    $alias | Out-File $ErrorLog -Append
    Write-Warning "Logged $alias to $ErrorLog."
    if ($everythingOK){
    $props = @{};
    $props = @{'Alias' = $alias;
    'DisplayName' = $gms.DisplayName;
    'TotalItemSizeInBytes' = ($gms.TotalItemSize.Value.ToString() -replace "(.*\()|,| [a-z]*\)", "");
    'TotalDeletedItemSizeInBytes' = ($gms.TotalDeletedItemSize.Value.ToString() -replace "(.*\()|,| [a-z]*\)", "");
    'MailboxType' = $gms.MailboxType; };
    $obj = New-Object -TypeName PSObject -Property $props
    Write-Output $obj
    END{}
    Example: Get-SomeMailboxStatistics -Identity GoodAlias1,GoodAlias2,FailAlias,GoodAlias3 -LogErrors -ErrorLog 'C:\Logs\MbxStatsErrors.txt' -Verbose
    The pipeline terminates on FailAlias, and then throws an error when it tries to pass the FailAlias to the $props.
    $gms | Get-Member on a good alias is:
    TypeName: Deserialized.Microsoft.Exchange.Management.MapiTasks.Presentation.MailboxStatistics
    I have tried setting $ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop' in various sections and think I am scope-creeping/not catching the Error where I should be or PowerShell is flat-out ignoring something.
    I have tried additional nested if{}else{} in the Try{}Catch{} and cannot get it to behave as expected.
    I have also tried to Trap{[ManagementObjectNotFoundException]} and Throw exception in various portions without success.
    However, setting $ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop' in the session window (from default of 'Continue') the script behaves as I expected it to, when encountering a non-existant mailbox, it logs the error. It doesn't seem to have issues executing on Windows 8.0/PowerShell
    3.0.
    I have encountered numerous blog/forum posts with no definitive answer/resolution.
    Based some of my tests around some suggestions from this thread:
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1142211/try-catch-does-not-seem-to-have-an-effect
    Extras:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/heyscriptingguy/archive/2010/03/09/hey-scripting-guy-march-9-2010.aspxhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/19553278/powershell-catch-non-terminating-errors-with-silentlycontinue
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15545429/erroractionpreference-and-erroraction-silentlycontinue-for-get-pssessionconfigur
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/scriptcenter/en-US/228a3329-f564-4daa-ad70-6d869b912246/non-terminating-error-turned-into-a-terminating-error?forum=winserverpowershell

    This is not the only problem with WMF 4.0
    When you use -ErrorAction 'SilentlyContinue', $Error object is not set.
    [PS]
    $Error.Clear()
    [PS]
    $objContact =
    Get-Contact -Identity
    'CN=unknown contact,OU=Users,DC=mydomain,DC=mytopdomain'
    -ErrorAction 'Stop'
    The operation couldn't be performed because object 'mytopdomain.mydomain/Users/unknown contact' couldn't be found on 'mydc.mydomain.mytopdomain'.
        + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (:) [Get-Contact], ManagementObjectNotFoundException   
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : 482E7079,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.GetContact
        + PSComputerName        : myexchange.mydomain.mytopdomain
    [PS]
    $Error.Count
    1
    [PS]
    $Error.Clear()
    [PS]
    $objContact =
    Get-Contact -Identity
    'CN=unknown contact,OU=Users,DC=mydomain,DC=mytopdomain'
    -ErrorAction 'SilentlyContinue'
    [PS]
    $Error.Count
    0
    That's why since Exchange 2010 SP3 Rollup 5 (i suppose when reading Exchange Supportability Matrix), The Exchange Management Shell link has been updated to use Powershell 2.0
    Before 2010 SP3 Rollup 5
    C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe -noexit -command ". 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\RemoteExchange.ps1'; Connect-ExchangeServer -auto"
    After 2010 SP3 Rollup 5
    C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe -version 2.0 -noexit -command ". 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\RemoteExchange.ps1'; Connect-ExchangeServer -auto"

Maybe you are looking for

  • Why my iPhone will touch the screen automatically, sometimes?

    I've got an iPhone 5s, I found it sometimes will touch the screen automatically while I didn't do anything. The first time I find his problem is in Ninja Rooftops, I noticed that it jumped lots of times by itself. And then I find this problem not jus

  • Blue Screen error STOP:0x0000001E erro

    Hi, Have i have getting blue screen error (STOP:0x0000001E) on windows server R2 standard edition. Server is working only in safe mode with networking but not normally. Due to which server is getting rebooted again and again..please help. suhasish

  • Mac will not start up! Help!!?

    Hi guys and gals - Before I reinstall my system software and lose my itunes and iphoto files I was wondering if anybody can help or has experienced the same problem as me. Here is what happened; I was about to import some pics from my camera when it

  • Oracle VM Manager V2V Issue revolving Local Repo to each host.

    Hi all, I have 5 oracle SPARC hosts running in my environment. But the problem starts when I'm forced to commit to an unusual storage mapping by mapping each hosts to their individual local repository. Bear in mind that this is due to storage archite

  • Regarding Flex application in Adobe Air

    I> I developed a flex application using FLEX BUILDER3. My main.mxml and background image file was under src directory in flex project. There was a folder named history under which index.template.html was present. I inserted the javascript code inside