Exchange 2010 max send receive size

Hi All,
Would someone be able to help me with a ps command to remove the message size restrictions from all user mailbox properties? We ran into a problem a while ago and opened a support call with MS regarding a user trying to send a 1.7GB file. Well exchange didn't
like that so we let MS have their way with our environment and now all users have a user 10MB send/receive limit. This has been confirmed by going into the user properties > mail flow settings tab > message size restrictions. We have the global setting
at 25MB along with the send/receive connector settings at 25MB but with the individual user limits at 10MB there is no point.
I have run and tested the following PS cmdlet
set-mailbox -Identity "user" -MaxSendSize 15mb -maxreceivesize 16mb
to run against an individual user mailbox but we have close to 22000 mailboxes and this would take forever to do one at a time. Is there a cmdlet I could run to remove these restrictions altogether all at once?
Thanks in advance

Hi Martina,
Thanks for the reply, being quite new to using Powershell I think I get the piped command but could you tell me what the -Resultsize unlimited part fetches?
If you don't include the resultsize unlimited, it will only pull down the first 1000 mailboxes in your query.
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Similar Messages

SBS2011 (Exchange 2010 SP2) - limiting cache size doesn't appear to work

Hi All,
Hoping for some clarification here, or extra input at least. I know there are other posts about this topic such as
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/smallbusinessserver/thread/5acb6e29-13b3-4e70-95d9-1a62fc9304ac but these have been
incorrectly marked as answer in my opinion.
To recap the issue. The Exchange 2010 store.exe process uses a lot of memory. So much in fact it has a negative performance impact on the server (sluggish access to the desktop etc). You can argue about this all day - it's by design
and shouldn't be messed with etc but the bottom line is that it does use too much memory and it does need tweaked. I know this because if you simply restart the Information Store process (or reboot the server) it frees up the memory and the performance
returns (until its cache is fully rebuilt that is). I have verified this on 4 different fresh builds of SBS2011 over the last 6 months. (all on servers with 16GB RAM)
I have scoured the internet for information on limiting how much memory exchange uses to cache the information store and most articles point back to the same two articles (http://eightwone.com/2011/04/06/limiting-exchange-2010-sp1-database-cache/
and
http://eightwone.com/2010/03/25/limiting-exchange-2010-database-cache) that deal with exchange 2010 and exchange 2010 SP1, notably not exchange 2010 SP2. Ergo most articles are out of date since exchange 2010 SP2 has been released since these articles
were posted.
When testing with our own in house SBS2011 server (with exchange 2010 SP2) I have found that specifying the min, max and cache sizes in ADSIEDIT has varying results that are not in line with the results documented in the articles I mentioned above.
I suspect the behaviour of these settings has changed with the release of exchange 2010 SP2 (as it did between the initial release and SP1).
Specifically here's what I have found using ADSIEDIT;
If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSize to a value - it doesn't have any effect.
If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax to a value - it doesn't have any effect.
If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin to a value - it always locks the store.exe process to using exactly this value.
I have also tested using combinations of these settings with the result that the size and max size values are always ignored (and the store.exe process uses the maximum available amount of memory - thus causing the performance degradation) but as soon as
you specify the min value it locks it to this value and it doesn't change.
As a temporary solution on our in-house SBS2011 I have set the min value to 4GB and it appears to be running fine (only 15 mailboxes though).
Anyone got some input on this ? thank you for your time.

I concur with Erin. I'm seeing the same behaviour across all SBS2011 boxes, whether running SP1, SP2 or SP3.
If a minimum value is set, the store cache size barely rises above the minumum. I have one server with 32GB RAM. Store.exe was using 20GB of RAM, plus all the other Exchange services which total 4GB+. That left virtually no free RAM and trying to do
anything else on the server was sluggish at best.
All the advise is that setting a maximum alone has no effect and a minimum must be set too. But when set, the store cache size barely rises above the minimum. I have set a 4GB minimum and 16GB max, but 5 days later it's still using only slightly more than
4GB and there's 8GB free. Now the server as a whole is responsive, but doing anything with Exchange is sluggish.
Just saying leave Exchange to manage itself is not an answer. The clue is in the name - Small Business Server. It's not Exchange Only Server - there are other tasks an SBS must handle so leaving Exchange to run rampant is not an option. Besides, there are
allegedly means to manage the Exchange cache size - they just don't apparently work!
I'm guessing nobody has an answer to this so the only solution is to effectively fix the cache size to a sensible value by setting min and max to the same value.
Adam@Regis IT

Exchange 2010 Server not receiving External Mail

Hi everyone,
I have an Exchange 2010 Server which is connected to an edge server.
Suddenly yesterday all the exchange users on this network stop receiving inbound Emails.
Sending and receiving internal emails still works and even sending outbound emails.
I try to restart the server to see if this could have solved the problem but unfortunately it didnt work.
I dont know much about exchange and would be grateful is someone could offer a solution.
Thank
Breon

Hi,
Agree with v_2udan. And I just want to make a supplement to him.
1.
The external Domain Name System (DNS) servers for your domain must have mail exchanger (MX) resource records pointing to your
mail servers, or, if you are using an Internet service provider (ISP) or an external system, this external system must have an MX record for your domain and a mechanism to forward mail to your Exchange servers.
2.
External servers must be able to access 25 port of you Exchange server on the internet. It can’t be blocked by firewall
or other networking settings.
3.
On Receive Connector, Anonymous users should be selected in Permission Groups.
4.   Since
you have Edge server, you can re-subscribe the Edge server.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Transport rule exchange 2010 not sending reply gets stuck in Queue

I am trying to set up a transport rule in exchange 2010 that will auto reply to a email address that is no longer valid. One of our exec passed away and they want a reply setup to send an automatic message. I read somewhere that the auto reply may not be
the right way to go about this so I was trying to setup a transport rule. I used the wizard to make the rule for conditions 1 all outside email addresses 2 sent to the internal email address specified. Actions 3 Send rejections message to sender with enhanced
status code
Created the message in the rule and gave it a status code 5.7.228 no exceptions and created the rule
Went to an outside email account and sent to the internal users account. It was reported that it was delivered from our mail filter I verified that it did not get delivered to the user then a few min later the reply appears in the queue viewer on exchange
a few min later it is gone I figured it worked but when I checked it did not get delivered to the outside email address or seen going through the mail filter. I'm missing something I know its right there somewhere just looking to long and I cant see it.
This is baffling me as to what happened? What account is it sent from? The user, administrator or do I need to create a postmaster account for it to work? I am a one man shop and it get kind of baffling some times
Thanks in advance for any help I will keep looking for the answer
John R
John R

Hi John,
From your description, I would like to verify the following things for troubleshooting:
1. Please verify if users can send messages to external email addresses.
2. Please check if internal users can receive the rejection messages.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support
Yes users can send to external address and internal users receive NDR rejection messages
The system has been in production for 2 years. I'm just trying to find the best way to setup a auto reply for users that are no longer with us or have moved on.
Thanks for your help
John R

Outlook 2010 cannot send/receive mail AND states mailbox is being optimized due to upgrade AND outlook hotmail connector needs updating.

As of 2014-March, the same thing happening on my system. This seems to have occurred, after the latest batch of 28 patches (including SP2 - KB2687455) from Microsoft Updates applied on 13-Mar-2014 and 19-Mar-2014. I have been running Outlook 2010
since it was first available.
An unhelpful error is thrown, after trying to manually perform a Send/Receive:
Not Implemented
While in Outlook 2010, clicking FILE > INFO reveals the following warnings in red:
"Upgrade in Progress. Your mailbox is currently being optimized as part of upgrade to Outlook 2010. This one time process may take over 15 minutes and performance may be affected while the optimization is in progress."
There's an "Upgrade Now" button but it fails to produce any visible result. Next to the button, another warning in red:
"You must upgrade to the latest version of Outlook Hotmail Connector to continue using this e-mail account."
Again, I do not have the Outlook Hotmail Connector installed. Nor have I recently upgraded to Outlook 2010.
I am unable to access ANY account settings, as well as poll my various mailboxes.
While reviewing the list of installed updates (Control Panel > Programs and Features > View Installed Updates), there are 28 approximate patches -
specifically, Service Pack 2 (KB2687455) - that were recently applied to Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010.
Microsoft, what the #$%# is going on?
I've read some related posts that suggest the core issue is other than what Outlook is reporting. The posts recommend the following. However, in my case, the below steps did not correct the
issue. In fact, the new profile would not allow me to view/manage the associated accounts or data files.
(1) Remove your current Outlook Profile. No worries - this doesn't affect your mail data (.PST files):
http://office.microsoft.com/en-au/outlook-help/remove-a-profile-HP010356455.aspx
(2) Create a new Outlook Profile:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-au/outlook-help/introduction-to-profiles-HA010355553.aspx
Note: Outlook complained "An unknown error occurred, error code: 0x80040154." However, exiting the Mail config window and relaunching shows that the new profile is intact.
(3) If you previously had the Outlook Hotmail Connector installed, reinstall it. If not, then just ignore and the warning should go away after creating a new Profile.
32-bit connector: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=24677

I was able to resolve this issue as follows. However, why it occurred is unknown at this time and
unrelated to a corrupted Outlook Profile, as mentioned on my prior post. It seems highly probable that it was caused by the recent batch of Microsoft Updates for this product which included Service Pack (SP) 2.
1) Performed a "repair" of Outlook 2010, via the Control Panel > Programs and Features.
2) Rebooted.
3) Prior to launching Outlook, returned to Control Panel > Mail and configured the location of my PST file (not in default directory).
4) Had to reestablish as off my mail accounts, settings/preferences/etc. This step was the most tedious and frustrating.

What is the Exchange 2010 maximum mailbox database size that is support by MS in a single DAG environment?

My Exchange setup:
Exchange 2010 Enterprise
2 mailbox servers
2 CAS, 2 HT
12 mailbox databases. The total of all databases combine is about 2TB. The largest mailbox databases are 530GB, 250GB, and 196GB. Are this over the supported recommendations?
bl

2TB, look at the second article but best practice 200GB or less
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/48431bab-4049-47db-9a84-359d5123d247/what-is-the-maximum-supported-database-size-in-exchange-2010-
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/f96892b3-8e2d-4eef-b64a-4cbc0097396d/ideal-size-for-exchange-mailbox-database

Outlook 2010 using Exchange 2010 - cannot send this item after updating draft email

I have a client who has the following setup.
SBS 2011 server (Exchange 2010) and a Windows 2008 R2 Terminal Server (with Office 2010 SP1 installed).
This particular user has a Windows XP PC with Office 2010 SP1 installed (joined to SBS 2011 domain).
This user creates a email at their office on their PC and saves it in draft to continue working on it when they get home.
At home they RDP into the terminal server and load outlook and start updating their saved (Draft) email. They then try to send it and the following error pops up. "Cannot send this item".
If they try to save the changes they have made it pops up with "The operation failed".
I have tried various settings all with the same results.
Office 2010, Office 2010 SP1, Online mode and Cache mode (on the Windows XP PC).
Any ideas?

Hi Rajkumar,
OK. After further testing I have narrowed it down to the email signature?
If I save a draft email in Outlook on the Fat client (Windows XP + Office 2010), then go straight into Drafts folder and open the email and add one line of text and try to send or save again it fails.
If I don't have a signature, it works fine.
I currently trying to determine what part of the signature it doesn't like (it is quite a large signature, multiple images and a disclaimer etc). I'm having mixed results - I can remove the signature totally from the draft email and then it will save
or send fine.
Strange that it can save the email to Draft in the 1st place but doesn't like updating it a 2nd time???
I have also created a new outlook profile (online mode) with the same results.

After server move Exchange 2010 not sending emails

We moved the servers to a different building and after getting everything set back up we're unable to send emails. The only thing that really should have changed would have been our external IP address. We've updated all of our DNS records to point to our new IP.When I go to "Microsoft Exchange with Database Availability Group Events" event log I see the error:The Microsoft Exchange Mail Submission service is currently unable to contact any Hub Transport servers in the local Active Directory site. The servers may be too busy to accept new connections at this time."When I go to Queue Viewer the "Last Error" listed is:451 4.4.0 Primary target IP address responded with "421 4.4.2 Connection dropped due to SocketError." Attempted failover to alternate host, but that did not succeed. Either there are no alternate hosts, or delivery failed...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi,
Based on the description, SharePoint users can send internal emails to each other, however, they couldn't send external emails to Internet.
Make sure the Authentication is set to TLS and Externally Secured, and the Permission Groups to Anonymous users and Exchange servers. Here is a related article for your reference.
Configuring outgoing email in SharePoint 2010 with Exchange 2010 – Step by Step Guide
http://sharepointgeorge.com/2010/configuring-outgoing-email-sharepoint-2010/
Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make
sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
If the issue persists, I recommend you check Queue Viewer to see if these messages are stuck in queue. Besides, please enable message tracking and check message tracking log to narrow down the issue. About message tracking, please refer to
Understanding Message Tracking.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Outlook 2010 performs send/receive task twice

I've searched the net all over and found no other mention of this problem, so here I go. When I do a send/receive check, first I quickly get a 5 of 15 tasks completed successfully, then I get what I've set the program up for, and that's my 10 of 10 task
completed successfully. If I remove all tasks for my 10 of 10, both the 5 0f 15 and the 10 of 10 disappear, but when I set up my 10 receives only again, the 5 of 15 returns as well. Is there anyway to correct this and only have a 10 of 10 send/receive
task? Thanks!!!

Hello,
This usually happens due to several reasons like if you have enabled a Virus Scanner, which comes as an inbuilt feature with the Microsoft Outlook. It can also happen if you have set “send/receive interval” quite short or “server timeout” as low.
So one by one you can check for all the three causes and overcome them with the recommended solution:
Solutions: 1. Disable Add-ins
Go to “File”-> “Section Options”-> “Sections Add-Ins”
From the “Manage” list, select the type of add-in you want to disable.
Click “Go” & proceed with the changes.
Restart Outlook.
2. Set “Short send/receive interval”
Go to “send/receive ” button-> “Show progress”. If there are more than two tasks shown per an email account. Then interval time needs to be changed, which by default is set to 30 minutes. To check it,
Move to “File”-> “Options”-> “Advanced”-> “send/receive”
Change the “Schedule an automatic send/receive every _ (more than 5 minutes) minutes.
3. Increase Server timeout.
Go to the “Account settings”. Double click on the configured file.
Move to the “advanced settings”tab.
Check the server time. Increase it up to 2 or 3 minutes.
Note: Do not set it below 1 minute.
Thanks & Regards
Clark Kent

Exchange 2010 Public folder database size grown upto 1.22TB

I have situation to discuss , have three exchange public folder server with 2010Ent edt. One of Pub folder dtabase has been reached 1.22TB . Problem is that we cant increase more storage as its reached over limit. We are unable to do backup as its need to
split in multiple chunk . I cant do offline defrag as if now casue of LUNs limit.
Do someone has such sitaution faced and have any recommendation is this ? I can do create a new PF database. More over I am looking some short of solution to split whole database in two part hosted by two PUB server and each database just do content replication
with each hosting own database on each server.Will really appriciate for any good suggestion. I am open for all other possibilities.
Saty

I have executed whole project to move from 2010 to 20103. Public folder was a big pain. It was 3 copy of 1.32 TB. Plan started from implementation of Archiving tool for exchange.
1- First level pulled all detail reports for PF name,size last access time ,update time ,type9 mail enable or normal.
2- Pull the report and calculate the free white space with all calculation of individual server wise, and get the actual data size ,
3- Target to one PF server holding passive copy of public folders (Not Master copy)
4- Target the public folder keeping 0KB size and create script to delete in non recurs mode so only folders which has size 0 will be delete and rest all be left just like that .
5- later target the folder size keeping huge data and foliter it out with root folder and check out the permission and reach out people if the really need the data .Get the sign off and delete it through recurs script.
If you not put recurs delete it will never allow to delete whole folder in one way.
6- Target folder which data are important and move them to shared mailbox . Using soem restore tool which can export pst of those folder and import into mailbox. Set the permission accordingly. And set Enterprise erchiving policy for that shared.Same above
two exercise need to apply for all public folders.
7- Target those folders which are in use and try to convince and move them to shared mailbox with unlimited mailbox size with EV archiving.
8- And at the end move replica of target server to master copy.
9- Once replica move is complete you can plan to delete the PF data edb file. It wont allow to delete directly as you have to go through ADSIEDIT method only.
10- while same exercise need to do for all other passive copy.
11- Create a fresh edb and now you can move pf replica content to new edb which will help to move actual data with very limited whitespace.
12- And this way whole PF will be in actual size and all junk and unwanted files/data/emails/meetings etc will be removed.
13- There will be one common issue of form created through outlook so you need to import them carefully using default system folder.

Powershell, Exchange 2010 - Sent and Received emails by domain to CSV

I think I almost have what I want but I can't figure out the last bits. Hoping someone can help.
This code does produce the results I want but I would prefer to have EventID send or EventID Receive in one line but can't figure out how to get the syntax correct. The result would then provide the actual total I'm looking for rather than having the
results in 2 files.
Get-MessageTrackingLog -Start (Get-Date).AddDays(-1) -ResultSize Unlimited -EventID receive | Select -Expand Recipients | Group { (($_).Split("{@}"))[1] } |select-object 'Name', 'Count' |export-csv c:\temp\Received.csv
Get-MessageTrackingLog -Start (Get-Date).AddDays(-1) -ResultSize Unlimited -EventID send | Select -Expand Recipients | Group { (($_).Split("{@}"))[1] } |select-object 'Name', 'Count' |export-csv c:\temp\sent.csv
Also, how do you get rid of the quotes "" in the csv file??
Thanks
Syncronet

Thank you for your help. Unfortunately, the output I get from the above code doesn't work. Here it is:
#TYPE System.Collections.Hashtable
"IsReadOnly","IsFixedSize","IsSynchronized","Keys","Values","SyncRoot","Count"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
"False","False","False","System.Collections.Hashtable+KeyCollection","System.Collections.Hashtable+ValueCollection","System.Object","2"
Did some of the code run off the end of the code box in your message? I tried to add it but I must be missing something somewhere.
Thanks again for your help on this.
Syncronet

Exchange 2010 deployment in Exchange 2003 Environment

Hello,
I have recently installed Exchange 2010 in an Exchange 2003 environment. I need some help migrating all my settings over to Exchange 2010
-- mailboxes, recipient policies, offline address book, free/busy, etc.
I have looked at these following TechNet sheets for assistance, but getting a bit confused:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719.aspx (Exchange 2013 System
Requirements)http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee332348.aspx (Upgrade
from Exchange 2003 Client Access)http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998186.aspx
(Exchange 2003 - Planning Roadmap for Upgrade and Coexistence)http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee681662.aspx (Install
Exchange 2010 in a Mixed Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007 Organization)
I have two domain controllers. Exchange 2010 is not installed on a DC, but Exchange 2003 is on one of them. I want to eventually decommission
the Exchange 2003 environment and implement and Edge Server in its place. Exchange 2010 is installed on a Virtual Machine. It's running SP3, the latest service pack. Exchange 2003 is on a physical machine and it's running SP2.
Please help me simplify what exactly I need to do to migrate 2003 configurations over to 2010.
Thank you for you much appreciated assistance.

Hi
I would install a new DC and seize the MSO roles to the highest server. Remember you can install server 2012 but not R2 yet.
You can setup your connectors on exchange 2010 to send/receive mail to the internet. make sure your ISP allows the new server.
You can also setup a routing group connector so that mail flows from EX2003 to EX2010 and vice versa during your transition period.
Remember to replicate your public folders to the new server and if you have a lot of data be patient. Once you happy with everthing then decomission the old DC.
Hello,
All FSMO roles are transferred (not seized) on my Windows 2008 R2 Standard Domain Controller. I transferred all the roles off my Windows 2003 Domain Controller. The W2K3 DC is also my Exchange Server 2003 SP2. I specifically did not want to
install Exchange 2010 on a DC. It's on its own member server.
Should I make the Exchange 2003 Server a Front-End Server when I create a routing group for mail flow to Exchange 2010? I want to eventually implement an Edge. Also, can I have mail flow from the Internet directly to the Hub and bypass the Exchange
2003 mail flow?

Exchange 2003 users are unable to send attachments larger then 8 MB to Exchange 2010 users on the same LAN

I am migrating from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010.
Users who are still on Exchange 2003 cannot send attachments any larger than around 8MB to Exchange 2010 users on the same LAN.
Users on Exchange 2010 can send large attachments to fellow Exchange 2010 users without issue.
I do not have any quota restrictions on Exchange 2010.
Had a look at the Exchange 2003 Connector but could not see any reference to attachement restrictions.
Has anyone come across this?

Here is a note of the NDR:-
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject:
The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:
Tracey xxxxxx on 01/12/2014 13:27
This message is larger than the current system limit or the recipient's mailbox is full.
Create a shorter message body or remove attachments and try sending it again.
<mail.xxxxxxxxx.com #5.2.3 smtp;450 5.2.3 Msg Size greater than allowed by Remote Host>

Exchange 2013 SP1 Not Receiving e-mail

Hello,
Mail flow between Exchange 2010 sp3 & Exchange 2013 SP1 (update Cu5) not working.
Exchange 2013 setup is Exchange 2013 sp1 DVD
Exchange 2010 when sending mail to external it's ok.
Exchange 2010 when sending mail to exchange 2010 users it's ok.
Exchange 2013 when sending mail to External it's ok.
Exchange 2013 when sending mail to exchange 2010 users it's ok.
or
Exchange 2010 when sending mail to exchange 2013 not working
Exchange 2013 when sending mail to Exchange 2013 not working
From internet --> SMTP GW (exh edge) --> Exchange 2010 it's ok
From Internet --> SMTP GW (exh edge) --> Exchange 2013 not working.
organization;
1 AD site and 1 PDC (2012 R2) + 3 DC (1x 2008 R2 + 2 x 2003 Server) (Windows Server 2003 domain fl)
With Exchange 2010 exchange 2013 on the same subnet. Exchange 2010 physical machine, Exchange 2013 physical machine ( eth Microsoft Team Server 2012 R2 )
All server is region setting Turkey
Exchange 2010 error
451 4.7.0 Temporary server error. Please try again later. PRX4
Exchange 2013 error
451 4.4.0 primary target ip address responded with 501 5.5.4 Invalid arguments. attempted failover to alternative host, but that did not succeed. either there are no alternate host, or delivery failed to all alternate hosts. Th
thanks

Hi,
From your description, the Exchange 2013 server can't receive emails internally and externally. I recommend you follow the steps below for troubleshooting:
1. Please restart the Microsoft Exchange Frontend Transport service on CAS and the Microsoft Exchange Transport service on Mailbox and check the result.
2. Please make sure that the authentication on default receive connector is right. Here is the configuration in my environment for your reference:
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

New mailbox move request Exchange 2010 : queued

I have deployed new Exchange 2010 server in Exchange 2003 Organization. It is simple setup one Exchange 2003 and New Exchange 2010.
I was trying to move mailbox from Exchange 2003 to 2010 and it has status of QUEUE “indefinetly”.. I have tried several mailboxes and result is the same.
Then I decided to create new database on Exchange 2010 sever. I have crate new mailbox on Exchange 2010 sever, send and receive some emails. And then try to move mailbox to new database. Same results.
I run test MSR replication and is ok.
I have increase msr LOGGING TO Maximum, no errors. I have rebooted server several times, no differences…

Hi,
Based on the description, status of mailbox move request from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 is "indefinitely".
Please make sure mailbox databases in Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2003 are mounted.
Have you moved mailbox using the New-MoveRequest with the BadItemLimit and the AcceptLargeDataLoss parameters? If not, it's worth to do it again. Before you create a new move request, please check if there is any previous move request. If there is, please
clear the previous move request and then move the mailbox.
If the issue persists, please try to move mailbox to another database in Exchange 2003 and then move to Exchange 2010 to check the result.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 max send receive size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for