Exclude Process Keys from Init of Purchase Order Items (2lis_02_itm)

Hello all,
Is it safe to do the following.
When initialising 2lis_02_itm, I find that fields are being overwritten as a result of invoice receipts (BWVORG = 003, 013, 023, 007, 017 or 027). For example the 'Completed Delivery Indicator' (EKPO-ELIKZ), can be checked for the Goods Receipt transaction (BWVORG = 002), but unchecked for the Invoice Receipt (BWVORG = 003). Our ODS has as key fields EBELN aand EBELP. All other fields (except goods receipt quantity) are set to overwrite.
I'm thinking of solving this problem by excluding all invoice receipt related transactions from my initialisation. Does anybody have experience with this?
Thanks for your help!
Aukje

After testing well, it looks like this will work for us.

Similar Messages

Purchase order item(2lis_02_itm) and 0PUR_O01 transformation

Hello,
I'm trying to populate DSO 0PUR_O01 with standard DS 2LIS_02_ITM Purchase Order Items
The mappings are not copied after BCT installation. so i have trouble in mappings some of the keyfigures of 0PUR_O01 with the extractor fields. It's confusing.
I did try to check rsosfieldmap for the datasource but failed to display any data for 2LIS_02_ITM. There are no entries in the table foe this DS.
0PDLV_QTY Actual Quantity Delivered
0PREQU_QTY Desired Delivery Quantity
0PCONF_QTY Confirmed Quantity
0PDVQLECR Quantity Delivered Late Acc. to Requested Delivery Date
0PDVQEYSC Quantity Delivered Early According to Schedule Line Date
0PDVQLESC Quantity Delivered Late According to Schedule Line Date
0PQCOASREQ Quantity Confirmed as Requested
0LOWR_BND Tolerance Limit for Under Delivery in %
0UPPR_BND Tolerance Limit for Over Delivery in %
Please suggest how to go ahead with the mappings ..

Hello Raj,
What ur following 3.5 or 7.0...?
In 7 there are less chances for mapping after BCT installation, you have to do manually mapping in some cases. You can also face some problem of copying routine. So need to see each and every field accordingly.
Best practice is to install in 3.5 and then migrate to 7 with appropriate steps.
Thanks,
Santosh

Import data to Purchase Order Item Level Text from DMS system

Hi,
I have the material PO Text maintained against the Material in the DMS system.
In R/3, when I am creating the Purchase Order, I want the system to retreive the PO Text maintained in DMS against the material in the Purchase Order and paste it in the Purchase Order Item details - Material PO Texts.
Could anyone suggest me which User Exit or BAPI and the Function Module to fetch this data from DMS.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jeetendra

Dear Gurus,
We are able to populate the "Import Data" in the backend PO in our backend system 4.6C, thorugh user exit
EXIT_SAPMM06E_004 & EXIT_SAPLV50E_004.
Now when we create PO from SRM , the import related foreign trade data gets filled up from the master data.
Problem: In Header and Line item condition: We are not getting the condition type GRWR automatically, if the PO is comming from SRM. Because of this the statistical value is 0.
( If we create manual PO, the condition GRWR appears in PO - and the Statistical value gets filled in automatically )
How can we put the condition type GRWR into the PO using user exit ?
Thanks and regards,
Anil Rajpal
Edited by: ANIL on Aug 12, 2010 6:18 PM

Updating Batch classification data from MIGO for Purchase order

Hi,
I need to update batch classification data (in MSC3n) from MIGO for purchase order. The logic needed for this is as below,
1) Pass material and batch to MCH1 table to get CUOBJ_BM.
2) Pass CUOBJ_BM to INOB table to get INOB-OBJEK.
3) Pass INOB-OBJEK to CLAF_CLASSIFICATION_OF_OBJECTS to get class name & characteristic name.
4) Pass INOB-OBJEK, CLASS name and characteristic name to BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE to update batch classification data.
I created implicit enhancement at the bottom of FM "CLVF_VB_INSERT_CLASSIFICATION". But the problem is, the return parameter of BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE is giving the following error.
Class type 023, object type MCH1, object RAW-6 0000001151
Object is currently locked by user
The assignment was not changed
Please let me know how to do it. Is there any BADI or User Exit?

Hi,
As you said the break point is not triggering did you activate your exit and activated even the project to which your exit is assigned.
I hope you missed activating your project in CMOD transaction. Please verify it once and if it is not activated then immediately activate it and try debugging again.
Regards,
Rafi

Date Deviates from permissible range [Purchase Order - Value Date]

hello all,
i want to add a Purchase Order (Services) Posting date 05/07/2008 and Delivery Date is 09/30/2008, it prompts me the Error "Date Deviates from permissible range [Purchase Order - Value Date]", now this is my question.
what is the date range for PO posting date and delivery date that the system will allow(date difference)? can i set this one?
Note: we need to make an advance PO for this since our BP required this time period for them to accomplished.
Please help.
Thanks.
FIDEL

FIDEL,
All documents have 3 dates DocDate, DocDueDate, TaxDate. The date ranges for these dates are taken from the Active Posting period definition.
Open Administration > System Initialization > General Settings > Posting Periods
Click on the Yellow link arrow next to the current posting period and check the Due Date From and To Range and expand the To date to cover 09/30/2008
Posting Date From
Due Date From
Document Date From
Suda

Pull Service tab data from Contract to Purchase order

Hi All,
I Just want to know if is possible to pull service tab data from contract to purchase order. When i create PO w.r.t Service Contract the data from the service tab is not pulled. So need help on how can I pull.
Please help..
Thanks,
Ros

Hi if u r referring service contract maintain it in the line item (Outline agreement no). All the other details will copied from Contract.
Check it out
Regards,
Raman

Purchase Order Items open vs ME2M discrepancy

First posting so if this is not the right section please move this topic. Was the closest I could come to correct forum placement.
Hello all, I am in the process of setting up BPM to monitor u201CN* of Purchase Order Items openu201D from various plant locations and I am noticing the number BPM gives is different than what the system you give if I used ME2M.
For example: I am setting up BPM to monitor Number of Purchase Order Items Open for plant location 2102. The set up is scarce and I only have a few fields filled out in the set-up:
-Document Type u2013 Single Value u2013 NB, UB, FO, ZPC, ZGR
-Plant (Item) u2013 2102
-Doc. Category u2013 F (Purchase Order)
-All of fields are left blank
When this runs I will get an example of 1487 (it changes on an hourly basis so I canu2019t give a static value).
When I try to verify this number using ME2M I get a value of 1237. A difference of 250.
The configuration I am using for ME2M is as follows:
-Plant u2013 2102
-Scope of List u2013 ALLES
-Selection Parameters u2013 WE101
-Document Type - NB, UB, FO, ZPC, ZGR
-All other fields at left blank
Any reason for this discrepancy? The closest I can guess is SAP is pulling in some additional information OR my configuration is incorrect. Anybody run into this issue that has some tips?
Thank you
-nic

I know that ME2M has nothing to due to with BPM.
I am confused as to why when I set up BPM, in Solution Manager, to monitor Purchase Orders that are open I am getting a different number than when I use the transaction ME2M in SAP ECC.
For example:
When the process runs in Solution Manager I get back 1425 open POs
When I go into SAP ECC and use the transaction ME2M it will only pull up 1175 open POs
Somewhere along the lines I am missing or adding 250 POs. The current setup (listed above; not sure if BPM is configured the same for everyone) is listed above.
I have tried various set-up options in both BPM Solution Manager and SAP ECC (ME2M) but can't seem to find where these additional numbers are coming from.
Thank you
-nic

MCEKPO-MENGE issue through 2LIS_02_ITM for Statistical Purchase Order Items

Hello Everyone,
I have come across this strange scenario where a given Purchase Order Item in the Source system - SAP R/3 has been changed in the following sequence,
1. First the PO Item was marked as a Deleted PO - LOEKZ = L which set the STAPO = X (Statistical) and
2. The Deletion Indicator was removed for the PO Item which means LOEKZ now is not having "L" and the STAPO also has been removed.
Due to the above scenario, now the Order Quantity in the SAP BW system has 0 as the value whereas the Quantity in the SAP R/3 System shows up as 1.
I was curious to know if there are any OSS Notes or processes in place to avoid this from happening. As I searched the forum and service place for the OSS notes related to this issue and could not find anything related.
The Order Quantity in our system is extracted from 2LIS_02_ITM (MCEKPO-MENGE) field.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Dharma.

hi Dharma..
Did you find a solution for this post?
I Have similar issue....
    I Have an issue (I think is issue)...with extractor 2LIS_02_ITM about reversal or deleted indicator.
Some PO are created on R/3 and mark for deleted some line items I try or I hope received a R indicator. But I didn´t receive the indicator..
     I only receive X on this field.. (delete indicator). or in other examples blank on this field
    Whats the difference between X , R and blank indicator?... when is posible receive X, R or blank value??
    I was thinking that when on R/3 some lines of PO orders were deleted.. I receive "R" indicator when I extract to BW (on the PSA)... but I didn't...
   If you know how work this kind of cases or examples, please explain me more.. or let me know where can I find more information please.
    I will assign points to all the answer.
   Thank you
Alice

QC51:No certificate is required for the purchase order item

Dear all.
I want to create an certificate Receipt In the T-CODE QC51.After input the purchase order and item and press return,the SAP show an error message:
No certificate is required for the purchase order item.
Message no. QC508
My question was where to control the purchase order item to require certificate or not?
Regard
Yoda

Hi
For this you have to maintain Certificate req in Material master.
MM01>Enter your material->Quality view-->Tick on QM procurement->Certificate require-Mension kind of certificate req.
like
E21     Cert. of conformity "2.1" EN 10204
E22     Test certif. "2.2"         EN 10204
E23     Works test certif. "2.3"   EN 10204
E31A     Insp. certificate "3.1.A" EN 10204
E31B     Insp. certificate "3.1.B" EN 10204
E31C     Insp. certificate "3.1.C" EN 10204
E32     Inspection report "3.2"    EN 10204
Q001     Conformance Report
Q002     Plating Certificate
Q003     Test Report
Q004     Certificate through Web
Q005     Chemical / Physical Test report + QC
etc.....
Customizing for this can be done in
SPRO->Quality Management->QM in Logistics--->Define Keys for Certificate Processing.
This will ask you during MIGO or during UD/confirmation possible thro' QC21
Regards
Sujit S Gujar

Purchase order item 00001 still contains faulty ac count assignments

Hello guys,
I have an issue with PO not being processed to SAP: it get on status, held, error in process. In SRM portal I get the message "Purchase order item 00001 still contains faulty ac count assignments".
I have checked the Purchase Order status in SAP SRM using the transaction BBP_PD and I got the status I1132 "Transfer failed (E.Sys.)".
Is there a way to reprocess the order and release the status to "Ordered"?
Please describe me the process in detail
Thank you,
Sarah

Hi,
First please check whether the Account assignment is allowed in the backend.
1.     Copy the GL account from the SC --> Go to backend system --> Go to FS03 transaction --> Paste the GL account and respective company code --> Go to tab Create/bank/interst --> Click on Field status group --> Check for Addtional account assignments --> Check whether this GL account is allowed to post for the account assignment enter in the Shopping cart.
If not allowed. Change the GL account in the SC and Retransfer the SC.
You can resubmit or retransfer using following FM or Report -
1.     BBP_PD_SC_RESUBMIT --> FM
2.     This is the new report BBP_SC_AUTO_RETRANSFER to change the status from
3.      Go to the portal --> SC monitoring --> Click on Create Follow on document or RZ20
Thanks.
From RBEI,
Snehal

Problem in replicating the purchase order items

Hi,
The Requirement is to replicate the line items of Purchase Order in ME23N which is extracted from BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1 and copy it in BAPI_PO_CHANGE .
The problem is when i am passing ACCTASSCAT(Account assignment category) it is not replicating else it is replicating.
while debugging the program the i am getting the data into internal table but it is not getting updated in database (ME23N).
I am getting messages in RETURN table as follows:
Instance 4200000020 of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed
Purchase order item 00170 still contains faulty account assignments
Please also populate interface parameter POITEMX
Account 402201 requires an assignment to a CO object
Please find the code below.

move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-HL_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-GR_TO_DATE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SUPP_VENDOR.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SC_VENDOR.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-KANBAN_IND.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-ERS.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-R_PROMO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-POINTS.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-POINT_UNIT.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-POINT_UNIT_ISO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SEASON.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SEASON_YR.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-BON_GRP2.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-BON_GRP3.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SETT_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-MINREMLIFE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-RFQ_NO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-RFQ_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PREQ_NO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PREQ_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-REF_DOC.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-REF_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SI_CAT.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-RET_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-AT_RELEV.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-ORDER_REASON.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-BRAS_NBM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-MATL_USAGE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-MAT_ORIGIN.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-IN_HOUSE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-INDUS3.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-INF_INDEX.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-UNTIL_DATE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-DELIV_COMPL.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PART_DELIV.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SHIP_BLOCKED.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PREQ_NAME.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PERIOD_IND_EXPIRATION_DATE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-INT_OBJ_NO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PCKG_NO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-BATCH.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-VENDRBATCH.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-CALCTYPE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-NO_ROUNDING.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PO_PRICE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SUPPL_STLOC.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SRV_BASED_IV.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-FUNDS_RES.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-RES_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-GRANT_NBR.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-FUNC_AREA_LONG.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-ORIG_ACCEPT.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-ALLOC_TBL.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-ALLOC_TBL_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SRC_STOCK_TYPE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-REASON_REJ.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-CRM_SALES_ORDER_NO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-CRM_SALES_ORDER_ITEM_NO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-CRM_REF_SALES_ORDER_NO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-CRM_REF_SO_ITEM_NO.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PRIO_URGENCY.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-PRIO_REQUIREMENT.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-REASON_CODE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-LONG_ITEM_NUMBER.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-EXTERNAL_SORT_NUMBER.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-EXTERNAL_HIERARCHY_TYPE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-RETENTION_PERCENTAGE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-DOWNPAY_TYPE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-DOWNPAY_AMOUNT.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-DOWNPAY_PERCENT.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-DOWNPAY_DUEDATE.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-EXT_RFX_NUMBER.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-EXT_RFX_ITEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-EXT_RFX_SYSTEM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SRM_CONTRACT_ID.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-SRM_CONTRACT_ITM.
    move 'X' to LT_ITEMX-BUDGET_PERIOD.
    append LT_ITEMX.
    clear LT_ITEMX.
endloop.
describe table LT_ITEM1 lines LV_NO.
sort LT_ITEM1[] by PO_ITEM.
read table LT_ITEM1 index LV_NO.
append lines of LT_ITEM1 to LT_ITEM.
clear LT_ITEM.
LV_NUM = LV_NO * 10.
condense LV_NUM.
concatenate '000' LV_NUM into LV_NUM.
loop at LT_ITEM where PO_ITEM is not initial.
    LV_INDEX = SY-TABIX.
    read table LT_ITEM1 with key PO_ITEM = LT_ITEM-PO_ITEM.
    if SY-SUBRC eq 0.
      if LV_INDEX gt LV_NO.
        LT_ITEM-PO_ITEM = LT_ITEM-PO_ITEM + LV_NUM.
        modify LT_ITEM transporting PO_ITEM.
      endif.
    endif.
endloop.
*LOOP at i_item.
call function 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE'
    exporting
      PURCHASEORDER = LS_TAB-V_EBELN
    tables
      RETURN        = LT_RETURN
      POITEM        = LT_ITEM
      POITEMX       = LT_ITEMX.
*ENDLOOP.
if not lt_iTEM[] is initial..
    call function 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      exporting
        WAIT   = 'X'.
     importing
       RETURN = LT_RETURN.
   WRITE: I_RETURN-MESSAGE.
endif.
endform.

Sales order items refers to different purchase order items

Hello SAP Experts,
I have a requirement where sales order items are referring to different purchase order items. For eg. Item 1 from SO exist in PO no. 11 where as item 2 from SO exist in PO 12. Transaction MIRO allows to post items belonging to different purchase orders, but we have to do invoice verification using IDOCs. In EDI process, it is taking PO number from the SO header and not from the SO items.
Can anyone suggest how to get PO number from the SO item and not from the SO header.
Thanks.

Not possible to create sales order with reference to PO.
but if to capture cost, you can consider adding cost to customer's invoice.
e.g.
SO -> PO -Inb/IR -> GR -> OB -> Inv(Add here)
to add in that invoice, its either manual or through automatic condition.

Class for Purchase order item components and Production order components

I'm looking for a some classes.   I'm very new to objects, so I could be searching for them incorrectly.
The first class I'm looking for is a purchase order class that contains the item components. I've looked at CL_PO_ITEM_HANDLE_MM and CL_PO_HEADER_HANDLE_MM. I couldn't find components as a part of either of the classes.
The second one I'm looking for is not as critical. It is for the components for a production order.   I have a function module: BAPI_PRODORD_GET_DETAIL that gets the components for the order. However, to take advantage of objects - I read somewhere - that if possible I should avoid calling a function module.
Any help that you could give would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
Michelle

Hello Michelle
I do not think there are already classes available on ERP 6.0 for reading production order (yet I might be wrong...). However, regarding purchase order you are already on the right track.
*& Report ZUS_SDN_OO_READ_PO
*& Thread: Class for Purchase order item components and Production order components
*& <a class="jive_macro jive_macro_thread" href="" __jive_macro_name="thread" modifiedtitle="true" __default_attr="1206523"></a>
"& NOTE: Coding adapted from BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1
REPORT zus_sdn_oo_read_po.
TYPE-POOLS: abap, mmpur.
PARAMETER:
p_ebeln   TYPE ebeln DEFAULT '3000000045'.
DATA: gs_document    TYPE mepo_document,
      go_po          TYPE REF TO cl_po_header_handle_mm,
      gs_header      TYPE mepoheader,
      gd_tcode       TYPE sy-tcode,
      gd_result      TYPE mmpur_bool.
data: gt_items       type PURCHASE_ORDER_ITEMS,
      gs_itm         type PURCHASE_ORDER_ITEM,
      gs_item        type mepoitem.
START-OF-SELECTION.
* prepare creation of PO instance
gs_document-doc_type    = 'F'.
gs_document-process     = mmpur_po_process.
gs_document-trtyp       = 'A'. " anz. => display
gs_document-doc_key(10) = p_ebeln.
* object creation and initialization
** l_ebeln = purchaseorder.
CREATE OBJECT go_po.
CALL METHOD go_po->po_initialize( im_document = gs_document ).
CALL METHOD go_po->set_po_number( im_po_number = p_ebeln ).
CALL METHOD go_po->set_state( cl_po_header_handle_mm=>c_available ).
* read purchase order from database
gd_tcode = 'ME23N'.
CALL METHOD go_po->po_read
    EXPORTING
      im_tcode     = gd_tcode
      im_trtyp     = gs_document-trtyp
      im_aktyp     = gs_document-trtyp
      im_po_number = p_ebeln
      im_document = gs_document
    IMPORTING
      ex_result    = gd_result.
* there was a problem in reading the PO
IF ( gd_result EQ mmpur_no ).
**    l_messages = l_handler->get_list_for_bapi( ).
**    PERFORM return TABLES l_messages return
**                          poitem poschedule poaccount.
**    CALL METHOD l_po->po_close( ).
ELSE.
    gs_header = go_po->if_purchase_order_mm~get_data( ).
    WRITE: / gs_header-ebeln,
             gs_header-bukrs,
             gs_header-bsart,
             gs_header-lifnr.
ENDIF.
gt_items = go_po->if_purchase_order_mm~get_items( ).
LOOP AT gt_items INTO gs_itm.
    gs_item = gs_itm-item->get_data( ).
    write: / gs_item-ebelp,
             gs_item-matnr,
             gs_item-menge.
ENDLOOP.
END-OF-SELECTION.
Regards
Uwe

In MR11 - u201CNo (suitable) purchase order/item found     u201C.

Hi Friends,
We are having issue with MR11 in 4.6 B. While doing MR11 for a PO where Delivery costs have not been balanced, we are getting message u201CNo (suitable) purchase order/item found     u201C.
In the research, we found that in 4.6 B, MR11 is using program SAPMM08K, where as in ECC 6.00, it is using program SAPRCKM_MR11.
Initial fetch from PO history table :
4.6 B -> In 4.6 B we are using EKBI view (Join via EKKO / EKPO / EKBE for MR11) to fetch the PO history table. (It is not considering EKBZ table for delivery cost records)
Program is checking the Quantity of EKBI, if there is no difference in quantity then it is coming out of loop and showing message
No (suitable) purchase order/item found
    Message no. M8 401
3CAUSE&
    No purchase order exists which corresponds to your entry for a quantity
    difference posting.
ECC 6 -> In ECC 6.00 we are using view V_CKMLGRIR (DB View: Selection for MR11 Clearing GR/IR Clearing Account Table u2013 EKKO, EKPO and EKBE)
Here also program is checking the Quantity in the View, if there is no difference in quantity then it is going for another fetch (which is missing in 4.6 B).
In the another fetch, it is checking View V_CKMLGRIR_FR (DB View: Selection for MR11 Clearing Freight Clearing Accnt Table u2013 EKKO, EKPO and EKBZ)
I've searched sap notes but couldn't find much help. I've tried different search criteria but no luck. Could anyone able to help me?
Thanks,
Ramesh S

HI
MR11 will show only the blocked invoices due to quantity/price difference.
First of all please check your invoice (MIRO of your required PO) that it is blocked for invoice verification or not .(Please note block for payment is not relevant for MR11).
Further please check if you have mainatined any tolerance in GRN (MIGO) for under or over delivery , so it is not escaping the PO due to under/over tolerance limit.
Cheers
Mukta

Free Item in Purchase Order Item

Hello All,
I would like to ask where in table level can I identify Purchase Orders which have "Free Item". Because on the screen field i saw from the technical definition that the "Free Item" is of field MEPO1211-UMSON, but when I go to EKPO I cannot find the corresponding field.
I have this idea but I don't know if it is right or not, in case I uncheck the "Invoice Receipt" in the Purchase Order Item details, the "Free Item" check box appears. So I am thinking is all Purchase Order Items which have "Invoice Receipt" (EKPO-REPOS) uncheck considered as a "Free Item".
Thanks.

Hi,
When we are talking about Free Items, in SAP terms, it means that we would not have any conditions/Gross/Net Price.
Also, Invoice Receipt will be unchecked because for free items, there would not be any invoice right?
So we can conclude that, once Invoice Receipt is unchecked + Free items is checked, this particular line item will be received as free goods.
Note that if the material is valuated, it will affect your MAP (moving average price).

Exclude Process Keys from Init of Purchase Order Items (2lis_02_itm)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for