F.01 & KE80 Report not match Value

Hi Expert,
We have made KE80 report as well F.01 FSV but while check both T.Code F.01 is giving Correct Information but Ke80 report giving Less amount then F.01. note : I have copied from KE5B as advice by Ravi Sankar Veena posted date 4th of June 2009.
but value is still same, wht should i do in this case. in F.01 m unable to access Dril Down Report. kindly help me.
Regards
Pranav

Hi Pranav
Blessed are those who have FI / EC-PCA reconciled
Even SAP has accepted in one of it notes that PCA is not intended to reconcile with FI.. Reasons are many and this thread would fall short for it..
For P&L accounts - It would reconcile because PC is derived from CO objects like CC.. So, where your GL is a cost element, you can relax
For B/S accounts - Its a night mare. Especially, when you do F.5D, there is no guarantee that the Splitted amount would match the original amount
Because of these reasons, New GL PCA was introduced
Br. Ajay M

Similar Messages

RE: COPA report and customer line item report not matching

Hi All,
COPA report and customer line item reports (fd10n) are not matching please let me know the reason.

ok

Trial Balance - Encumbrance & Encumbrance Details Report not matching

Hi,
Our client has recently raised one issue saying Trial Balance - Encumbrance with 'Obligation' parameter and Encumbrance Details Report (both reports period name and Enc Date to choosen as FEB-12 and 29-Feb-2012).
The final totals related to both reports does not match and why could be such difference occuring between the two reports. As both reports logically dealing with Enumbrance one at PO level and another one at GL level. And po transactions have been transferred to GL.
Please explaing how to search those records which are showing these differences in main report.
Appreciate in advance for your reply.
Regards,
Prasad

Hi,
This seems to be due to the rounding issue in the database.
Can you check and confirm whether any time during the business process, in the system the decimal settings were increased or decreased ? If yes, then it can be due to the calculation (rounding)
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Report not matching FBL5N & FBL1N ? ? ? ? ?

Dear All
Experts ,
Facing one problem that our customer is our vendor too and for that we do refer FBL5N & FBL1N.
It is required in according to that both reports must matched. But once the user reverse one document and it is
not showing in FBL1N report while FBL5N showing right balances and transaction figures.
What may be the reason for not showing one reversal ?
Experts please help.
Regards,
Pankaj.

Hi
Kolipara.
If I check those boxes will it solve my problems ?
How to deal with the earlier posted entries ? The difference is around Rs.20,000/- and if I again reverse the document
the effect will take place at both side and difference will be same as earlier.
So I want to rectify that issue.
further all transaction will manage by ticking those boxes but earlier are much problem either.
And I checked the masters of my other vendor and customer who are same in those, there boxes are unicked but
still balances are matching . . . How so ?
Can you please put a focus on it !
Regards,
Pankaj.

Report not matching

Hi,
We have created a customized report for "Totals by posting key for trade account". When we match the figure of the report with FS10N for a particular month, the difference is going beyond 1 million.
Can anyone help me in where to check to find the different. In QAT, the figures are matching but in PRD is not matching.
Any advice/suggestion/solution is appreciated.
thanks

Use tcode SE16. Put your table name in. Start of with BSIS(open) then move on to BSAS(cleared). Put in you parameters Company code, account and period. You will get a list of all the GL postings. Compare that to a list produced by you custom program. You will need details from your custom report in order to find the differences. Start off with a day or some small sample.
Points assigned are appreciated.

SCCM 2012 R2 Reports not activate Value button and not showing Visio and Project products

Hello,
I have experiencing some problems with SCCM reports
1) In some of the reports the "Values" button is disabled and because of that I can not select the name of a specific computer, the reports I've noticed that are relating to Specific Computers
2) The other problem is that when reviewing a software inventory report on a specific computer, Visio nor the Project of Microsoft Office does not appear , which itself can be seen from the Resource Browser
I will appreciate it very much to help me to solve these drawbacks presented in the reports of SCCM 2012 R2.
Thanks in advance.
Manuel
Manuel´s Microsoft Forums Threads

open the report in the report builder tool (in the console, right click and edit. From the reports web page you can click the drop down and choose open with report builder) and examine the query that is being used to populate the computername
values list. You should be able to run that query from the report builder utility to see if anything is being returned. For the report you mention, there is no query to bring back computer names. In report builder, in the left hand menu, open the parameters
folder, then right click @variable from the list and open the properties. Go to the available values item in the menu of the properties window and notice that the available values is set to none, not get values from a query. That is why you can't click on
Values in the SSRS report and get a list of computer Names. You could add a query into the report and save the report if you really want a drop down list of all computer names. I would save the report with a different name if I were to take that approach,
it is not a good practice to modify the built in reports.
Regarding the applications you are not seeing, you will have to look at the query contained in the report, and determine if that query is targeting the same view or data that you were looking at using resource explorer. Which category within resource
explorer were you seeing the information you were expecting to see in this report? You can use report builder to see that the report you are looking at is calling a function to return the software titles, and that function looks to be based on the v_gs_softwareproduct
view. If you were looking at software files or add/remove programs within the resource viewer, you won't necessarily see the same information in the report, since the report is reading a different view.
I hope this info will help you to troubleshoot report quirks. SCCM 2012 reporting is a world apart from SCCM 2007 reporting. There are alot more stored procedures and functions used in SCCM 2012, and even a dll file on the reporting point that is required
for some (most) of the reports!

Query to get not matching values

Hello ,
i want to create a query between two tables , the name column is a primary key in first table and forigen key on the second table .
t1--
name varchar2(20) -- primary key
value number(11,2)
t2--
name varchar2(20) -- forigen key
value number(11,2)
i am trying to get the name which the values is not match in both table .
note: the second table maybe there is more then 1 record for the name
Edited by: oracleuser on Aug 29, 2010 1:06 AM

Hello
The query works well for me
SQL> select * from t1;
NAME      VALUE
divya        10
deepa        11
SQL> select * from t2;
NAME      VALUE
deepa        11
divya        20
divya        22
SQL> select t1.name,t1.value,t2.value
2 from t1,t2
3 where t1.name=t2.name and t1.value != t2.value;
NAME      VALUE     VALUE
divya        10        20
divya        10        22If this is not what you want, then explain with some sample data

Custom Report Not fetching values for parameter of report (Valueset not pop

Hi,
I am running custom report on Oracle application R12. This report parameters used standard value set for fetching purchase order number. The value set is not populating any values for the custom report. but for the standard report where this valuse set populating proper result.
It's bit Supprising ...the same valuset populating values for standard reports but not for custom report developed by me.
Value set query using table valueset and getting values from po_headers (View)
Thanks

Hi All,
Luckily I have been able to rectify the problem !
I tried retrieving the output using LISTCUBE to show the SID of the InfoObject also for which I was unable to get the data. After the report successfully gave the output for those I/O, I checked again I could see the data in the I/O maintain master data !
It worked like magic to me !
But I could guess that since it is a virtual I/O therefore it is not able to retrieve the data from the table directly and is able to do that only after the SID of this I/O is retrieved.
(If a characteristic does not have any master data, the values from the SID table are displayed for the "Values in Master Data Table" mode.)
Closing the thread !
Regards
Shalabh

Report not picking value for segment reporting

Hello,
The PA report is not picking up the carry forward value. I have checked the following.
1)in FS10N balance carry fwd has been done.
2)2keh Profit center carry fwd actual balance has been performed
3)KE5Z Chk a/c wise transaction, it is showing that PA documents exist
The program was developend last year December and it had picked the correct value for the same (cumulative value).
Kindly let me know what could be the possible reason. Any pointer for the same will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Jyoti

self answerd

KE30 Report not displaying value in element line , why ?

Dear COPA Experts ,
IN KE30 ,there is a line element displaying for main prodcut (Value field used is Qty ) ,in the Same way i have created new element line for displaying by-prodcut qty (value field used is Qty ) ,after report generated and executed ,but it does not displaying the qty value of by -prodcut . but when drilling down to line item ,this KE30 is displaying line items of by-Prodcut .
the cost elements groups used for both are different and when run KE24 i was able to see by-Prodcut qty .
Can any one suggest ,wehther i have missed any setting ?
Thanks
Partha

Hi DaveMac1960,
According to your description, when you render data in report, you find it always shows the data with unexpected order. Right?
In Reporting Services, if we don't set any sorting in tablix, it will order the data as your query in SSMS or Query Builder. In some scenario, for example, we add parent group for data rows, it will have the rows sort by the group on data field by default,
and the "order by" in your query will be ignored. So please check the Sorting tab in Tablix Properties, in this scenario, we suggest you delete any sorting in the Sorting tab so that the "Order By" clause can work.
Reference:
Sort Data in a Data Region (Report Builder and SSRS)
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

CJI3 report not displaying values correctly in the "Total Quantity" field

Dear Friends,
Need your assistance on the issue explained below,
In our project there is a scenario where the actuals posted on a WBS are split/distributed to various WBS.These actuals that are split can be CATS entries,manual posting (KB21) or postings that come to R3 from a legacy system.The split happens by means of a custom program and is not standard.There is a tab seperated text file that contains the split percentages and the sender as well as the receiver WBS elements.Off late it has been observed that after the split is done the CJI3 report does not show the split quantities correctly and hence there is difference in the values displayed in the currency field.This is not a rounding off difference and is considerable.We have done all possible analysis from our side but i am unable to find how the difference occurs.
To add to this i have even come across certain notes which describe the issue closely but none of it has helped so far. I have simulated the scenario with the same settings in the Quality server and it seems to work fine there without any glitches. We have even compared the program in both the Quality as well as the Production servers and there is no difference in the program as well.The values for the total quantity field are stored in the table COVP and it has been observed the report is fetching this data to display in CJI3.
I have run CJEN too but this too does not correct the report. I was just wondering if any of our colleagues can provide me with some suggestions or insight in this issue.
Regards,
Gokul

Hi Praveen,
Thanks for the response.
Actually i did debug the program with the help of our technical guys but found nothing wrong in both the quality and the production system. We compared the program in both the systems and it seems to be same. I am exploring this issue. Will update the findings here.
In case anyone has any suggestion please do suggest.
Regards,
Gokul

Trial balance reports not matching (F.08 & S_PL0_86000030 / S_PL0_86000028)

Hi,
I'm facing an issue with the trial balance, while running the T.Codes S_PL0_8600028/30 and F.08. The balancing figure as per s_pl0_86000028/30 is say for example 66890 and the balance as per F.08 is 66853 for the fiscal year 2008.
In both the cases the balances as per the debit and credit sides are the same i.e., the trial balance is matching repectively in each of the cases.
In fact, in the company we have been using S_PL0_86000030/28, however there is an issue of amount being seen in the account Inter Segment Clearing or PRofit Center Clearing account.
And so, as an alternative I'm trying to use the T.Code F.08 where the issue of Inter segement clearing is not there, however there is a mismatch between the balancing figures of the above stated reports.
There is the above mentioned mismatch where the total balance even after excluding the Inter segement clearing account (GL account) and running the reports exists
Please share some insights on the same.
Regards
Soujanya.

Hi,
Yes. I do have the amounts by which it is differening between each of the respective GL accounts. The point is, the amounts that show the difference are the closing balances and so to identify the particular transaction for the amounts is quite challenging.
In fact, I've tried running F.51 for each of the GL accounts, however over the year there are places where similar amounts are posted for more than one time.
Like, if there is an amount of XYZ that is showing up the difference for a particular GL, then when I try to filter on that basis then I can see this XYZ amounts for 5 times in the whole year. To drill down to the right amount is where I'm facing an issue.
Regards
Soujanya

Reports not matching

Hi Group,
The actuals standard line item report FMRP_RFFMEP1AX / program RFFMEPGAX does not have the same dollar value for purchase requisitions as the budget report FMRP_2FMB4002 / program RFMDUMON
Any ideas or suggestions? Please let me know
Thanks,

We started having this problem with some of the reps after migrating from the old CAD servers to new CAD servers. Since the new system didn’t have the updated RASCAL DB, I thought the reports have the stale data. I was under the impression that it gets cleared after a day(once CSD has a fresh data) but seems like that’s not the case. I didn’t get time to look into this further and have requested TAC to help me on this.
-Sunil

Cross Tab Report not matching Data from report

I created a report showing the number of orders created by each department per year for the last 5 years. I double checked the data, and 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 all are correct.
I then created a cross-tab for quick reference for my department head. 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009 are all correct. 2008 is not. It shows 500 more orders than the data in the report for that year.
I double checked my "Group options" to make sure that they were the same in both the data and in the crosstabs. Any idea what I could be missing?
Thank you.

Try this, limit the report to only 2008, show details, add date to detail section, and add the record number (From special fields)
see if this count matches what you think it should be, or is 500 over like the crosstab indicates. You could group by date, by month, add a summary (Count) by date, and see what that comes up to. If your extra records fall in a certain date range, double check the database to make sure there are not duplicate records.

Data type size does not match values returned

I've tried searching but couldn't find what I was looking for, sorry if this has been answered or is a duplicate.
I am using the (Java) method below to get the column definitions of a table. I am doing this through an ODBC connection (using Oracle ODBC driver) and I have NO CHOICE in the matter.
The problem I am having is that one particular column has a column size is smaller than the size of the data it purportedly holds (ie attendance_code = varchar size 3 but data value is "Absent". I suspect the data is actually a look up to situation, where my attendance_code column has a value of 'ABS' and Oracle goes and fetchs the "Absent" value.
My issue is that the meta data returned from ODBC is the actual column definition (ie varchar(3) and not varchar2(10) for example).
How do I resolve this? I do not have access to all_columns table etc. I have to do it using ODBC metadata only.
TIA.
public ArrayList<SchemaColumn> getColumnsForTable(String catalog,
               String schema,
               String tableName) {
          ArrayList<SchemaColumn> columns = new ArrayList<SchemaColumn>();
          ResultSet rs = null;
          try {
               DatabaseMetaData metaData = connection.getMetaData();
               rs = metaData.getColumns(catalog, schema, tableName, "%");
               SchemaColumn column;
               while (rs.next()) {
                    column = new SchemaColumn();
                    column.setName(rs.getString("COLUMN_NAME"));
                    column.setDataType(rs.getInt("DATA_TYPE"));
                    column.setTypeName(rs.getString("TYPE_NAME"));
                    column.setColumnSize(rs.getInt("COLUMN_SIZE")); <-------- this is the value that is coming back smaller than the data it actually returns
                    column.setDecimalDigits(rs.getInt("DECIMAL_DIGITS"));
                    column.setNumPrecisionRadix(rs.getInt("NUM_PREC_RADIX"));
                    column.setNullable(rs.getInt("NULLABLE"));
                    column.setRemarks(rs.getString("REMARKS"));
                    column.setDefaultValue(rs.getString("COLUMN_DEF"));
                    column.setSqlDataType(rs.getInt("SQL_DATA_TYPE"));
                    column.setSqlDateTimeSub(rs.getInt("SQL_DATETIME_SUB"));
                    column.setCharOctetLength(rs.getInt("CHAR_OCTET_LENGTH"));
                    column.setOrdinalPosition(rs.getInt("ORDINAL_POSITION"));
                    columns.add(column);
          } catch (Exception e) {
               Log.getLogger().error("Could not capture table schema");
          closeResultSet(rs);
          return columns;
Edited by: user10382699 on Apr 11, 2011 4:15 PM

John, thanks for your reply.
As far as I know I'm not doing anything inaccurately/incorrectly.
The select I am using is SELECT * FROM <tableName>.
The resultset metadata has a size of 3 for the column in question, and querying the schema also yields 3 for that column.
I've tried recreating the situation using the Oracle XE DB, but as I am not familiar with Oracle, I do not know how to recreate this scenario (which would then lead me to test other options with ODBC).

F.01 & KE80 Report not match Value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for