Trial Balance - Encumbrance & Encumbrance Details Report not matching

Hi,
Our client has recently raised one issue saying Trial Balance - Encumbrance with 'Obligation' parameter and Encumbrance Details Report (both reports period name and Enc Date to choosen as FEB-12 and 29-Feb-2012).
The final totals related to both reports does not match and why could be such difference occuring between the two reports. As both reports logically dealing with Enumbrance one at PO level and another one at GL level. And po transactions have been transferred to GL.
Please explaing how to search those records which are showing these differences in main report.
Appreciate in advance for your reply.
Regards,
Prasad

Hi,
This seems to be due to the rounding issue in the database.
Can you check and confirm whether any time during the business process, in the system the decimal settings were increased or decreased ? If yes, then it can be due to the calculation (rounding)
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Similar Messages

The cumulative balance displayed in FS10N does not match the sum of the det

Hello,
The cumulative balance displayed in FS10N does not match the sum of the details. For example, we have a GL disbursement account that has a ***. Balance of 8 million. The debit is 2 million and the credit is 10 million. But, when you drill down on the ***. Bal. for the current period, the sum of the details is 9 million. According to our users, the 2 balances should equal. I did a search in this forum and found 1 post stating they had the same issue and the answer was to run f.16. Has anyone experienced this and if so, how did you handle it? I'm not sure how f.16 functions. Do we have to run it for each consecutive year? I'm not a FI specialist. I'm responsible for data archiving and the users think it's related to archiving. However, we have a test system that was resynced with production prior to when archiving was done and it shows that this issue is pre-existing.
Thank you very much in advance,
Lourdes

Hello,
There is a possibility that you have activate line item display for some of the accounts at a later stage. Meaning that earlier postings were not be shown for the earlier postings but only totals will be made available. Therefore, obviously there is bound to be difference between line item report and totals report.
You need to identify which accounts are being changed with line item display at a later stage.
In case if you forget to keep GL Line item display for an account, but the posting are already made the following steps you would required to get the line item display retrospectively.
1. Note that you are NOT required to make the balance of that GL account to ZERO. Please do not confuse with Open Item Management.
2. Put the check box line item display for the account in FS00. Make sure you are entering right company code.
3. Block the account for posting in COA Segment and Company Code Segment in FS00
4. Go to SA38 and run program RFSEPA01 (Give correct GL Account and Company Code)
5. Now, remove the block you kept on the GL Account in FS00.
This will reset the line item display retrospectively.
Hope this will solve your problem.
Regards,
Ravi

Trial balance reports not matching (F.08 & S_PL0_86000030 / S_PL0_86000028)

Hi,
I'm facing an issue with the trial balance, while running the T.Codes S_PL0_8600028/30 and F.08. The balancing figure as per s_pl0_86000028/30 is say for example 66890 and the balance as per F.08 is 66853 for the fiscal year 2008.
In both the cases the balances as per the debit and credit sides are the same i.e., the trial balance is matching repectively in each of the cases.
In fact, in the company we have been using S_PL0_86000030/28, however there is an issue of amount being seen in the account Inter Segment Clearing or PRofit Center Clearing account.
And so, as an alternative I'm trying to use the T.Code F.08 where the issue of Inter segement clearing is not there, however there is a mismatch between the balancing figures of the above stated reports.
There is the above mentioned mismatch where the total balance even after excluding the Inter segement clearing account (GL account) and running the reports exists
Please share some insights on the same.
Regards
Soujanya.

Hi,
Yes. I do have the amounts by which it is differening between each of the respective GL accounts. The point is, the amounts that show the difference are the closing balances and so to identify the particular transaction for the amounts is quite challenging.
In fact, I've tried running F.51 for each of the GL accounts, however over the year there are places where similar amounts are posted for more than one time.
Like, if there is an amount of XYZ that is showing up the difference for a particular GL, then when I try to filter on that basis then I can see this XYZ amounts for 5 times in the whole year. To drill down to the right amount is where I'm facing an issue.
Regards
Soujanya

Accounts Payable Trial Balance in R-12 report rows don't balance

Hi,
Background: I am in a municipal government using encumbrance accounting in R-12.
In 11i the AP Trial Balance (APTB) always balanced line for line when comparing the ORIGINAL AMOUNT to the AMOUNT REMAINING. This is not always the case in R-12.
In R-12, if the invoice involves multiple accounting distributions that cross funds, then the ORIGINAL AMOUNT column shows invoice totals (e.g. three rows of $30 each). The AMOUNT REMAINING column shows line amounts (e.g. three rows of $10 each). This results in these three lines being out of balance.
Is this by design in R-12, or is it a glitch, or is this something that is only happening to my instance?
Thanks for your assistance!

Hi,
We also faced the same problem and approached Oracle support.
They provided us with a patch and datafix. Better raise an SR and get specific support.
Regards,
Sridhar

The number of details is not matching with the total count.

Hi all, again stuck with the code.
There is a form where i have to populate all the details of few tables in excel & there is a report where i have to make count of all these details.
The problem here is the number of details that is populated in excel is not matching with the count in report, both have to match. There some problem in code, please help me in matching it.
The below is the 5 tables with the columns below.
Tables are ENQACEDTL, ENQACEHDR, ENQACMDTL, ENQACMHDR, ENQACSPEC:
The Names mentioned below the table's name are Column Names:
ENQACEDTL
ENQACEHDR
ENQACMDTL
ENQACMHDR
ENQACSPEC
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENGREF
ENGREF
QTY
OFFREF
MINSL
ITEM
EPREPBY
ITEM
BRANCH
EINSL
FRAME
DEPT
RATING
DEPT
MTEMP
TECOLD
ENGREFTDT
ENCLIP
MKTREF
ETEMP
THE BELOW IS THE SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR POPULATING DATA IN EXCEL:
SELECT ENQACEDTL.ENQNO, ENQACEDTL.ENQAMDNO, ......... (....ALL COLUMNS)
FROM ENQACMHDR,ENQACMDTL,ENQACEHDR,ENQACEDTL,ENQACSPEC
WHERE
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACMDTL.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENQNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACMDTL.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACEHDR.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACEHDR.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREF=ENQACEDTL.ENGREF AND
ENQACMDTL.ITEM=ENQACEDTL.ITEM AND
ENQACMHDR.DEPT=:PROC_DEPT AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREFDT BETWEEN :FROMDATE AND :TODATE
ORDER BY ENQACMHDR.ENQNO,ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO;
THE BELOW IS THE SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR COUNT OF DETAILS IN REPORT:
SELECT ALL ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.DEPT, COUNT(ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.ENQNO) COUNT
FROM ACENQ.ENQACEDTL, ACENQ.ENQACEHDR
WHERE (ACENQ.ENQACEDTL.ENGREF=ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.ENGREF)
AND ENQACEHDR.LOCKE=1 AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREFDT BETWEEN :P_STDATE AND :P_ENDDATE
GROUP BY ENQACEHDR.DEPT;
There is problem in join condition of 1st code that is in the "SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR POPULATING DATA IN EXCEL":
Please help me to sort out this problem..
Thank You.
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Oracle Forms & Reports Builder 6i.

As Karthick points out, we cannot help if we cannot see your correct table structures (create table statements) and some example data and expected output (insert statements would be helpful). You're telling us there's a problem, but we cannot see what the problem is as you've not shown it. Just saying your query is not working is like me telling you my car is not working, but not telling you what the symptoms are. You wouldn't know where to start in fixing it.
Why are you using Oracle 9.2.0.1 ? Not only has that version been unsupported for about a decade, but 9.2.0.7 was the first version of 9i that was considered 'stable' as versions prior to that were considered buggy. So you're using an old, unsupported and buggy version of oracle. Seriously, you need to consider upgrading to a supported version, preferably at least the latest 11g version.
And what has oracle Forms and Reports got to do with the issue?
And please explain how you are getting your data out of Excel and presenting it to Oracle to be able to query against it. Excel does not have "tables", so your question is completely unclear how you are querying the data from Excel.

Report not matching FBL5N & FBL1N ? ? ? ? ?

Dear All
Experts ,
Facing one problem that our customer is our vendor too and for that we do refer FBL5N & FBL1N.
It is required in according to that both reports must matched. But once the user reverse one document and it is
not showing in FBL1N report while FBL5N showing right balances and transaction figures.
What may be the reason for not showing one reversal ?
Experts please help.
Regards,
Pankaj.

Hi
Kolipara.
If I check those boxes will it solve my problems ?
How to deal with the earlier posted entries ? The difference is around Rs.20,000/- and if I again reverse the document
the effect will take place at both side and difference will be same as earlier.
So I want to rectify that issue.
further all transaction will manage by ticking those boxes but earlier are much problem either.
And I checked the masters of my other vendor and customer who are same in those, there boxes are unicked but
still balances are matching . . . How so ?
Can you please put a focus on it !
Regards,
Pankaj.

Report not matching

Hi,
We have created a customized report for "Totals by posting key for trade account". When we match the figure of the report with FS10N for a particular month, the difference is going beyond 1 million.
Can anyone help me in where to check to find the different. In QAT, the figures are matching but in PRD is not matching.
Any advice/suggestion/solution is appreciated.
thanks

Use tcode SE16. Put your table name in. Start of with BSIS(open) then move on to BSAS(cleared). Put in you parameters Company code, account and period. You will get a list of all the GL postings. Compare that to a list produced by you custom program. You will need details from your custom report in order to find the differences. Start off with a day or some small sample.
Points assigned are appreciated.

RE: COPA report and customer line item report not matching

Hi All,
COPA report and customer line item reports (fd10n) are not matching please let me know the reason.

ok

Oracle r12.1 - Material Account Distribution Detail report not opening in Excel

Hello,
We have a requirement to open Material Account Distribution Detail Report to transfer the output to MS Excel when user clicks the "View Output" window. Below is the setup. And I have verified over and over that setup is correct. Still, for some reason, concurrent program output is dumped in XML format on the browser window! What is causing this and why? What am I missing?
My Data Definition
===========
Name INVDSTRL_XML
Code INVDSTRL_XML
Application Oracle Inventory
Start Date 27-Apr-2013
End Date
My template definition
=============
Name INVDSTRL_XML
Code INVDSTRL_XML
Application Oracle Inventory
Type RTF
Start Date 27-Apr-2013
Default File Item_error_report.rtf
End Date
Default File Language English
Subtemplate No
Default File Territory
Default Output Type EXCEL
Conc Program Def:
============
Program: INVDSTRL_XML
Short Name: INVDSTRL_XML
Application: Oracle Inventory
Executable Name: INVDSTRL_XML
Method: Java Concurrent Program
Output Format: XML
Rest are defaults
I also checked the version of BI Publisher by passing following query.
SELECT DECODE (bug_number, '4440000', '5.6.3') PATCH, bug_number FROM ad_bugs WHERE bug_number IN('4440000');
Not sure what is the issue. Why the output is not being diverted to EXCEL. Please advise. Why it dumps into XML and Not Excel? This is on r12.1.3
Thanks.
Darsh

Hi Abdul,
Before running the report select the particular "inventory organization" and then run the report.
It seems you were directly running the report without selecting the Inv org.
Please try again.
Thanks
-Arif.

Missing Function - Aging Report not match in System Currency in SBO 8.8

Dear all,
Version: (Please provide the current version)
SBO 8.8 Patch: 10
Description of requirements: (Please provide a detailed description)
In mentioned patch level, the result/outstanding balance of Aging Report in System Currency was difference when selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' or not. The outstanding balance should be be same on both selection.
Valid as of: (Date that this legal requirement is applicable)
N/A
Business needs: (Please describe the impact on your business, if the functionality is not realized)
If the Aging Report cannot disppay the outstanding documetns for reconcile with customer, they cannot check with customers.
Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality should work.)
Generate the Aging report in System Currency
selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' including all transactions and balance is same as Trail Balance
un-selected 'Display Receoncilied Transactions' does not inclding the transactions that Local Currency is zero amount, but System Currency is not zero. The outstanding balance is different to the result of the above selection and Trail Balance as well.
Current Workaround: (Please describe the workarounds you are using at the moment)
Print the Aging Report with selected ' Display Reconcilied Transactions' to show ALL transactions to reconcile the transactions.
Proposed solution: (Please suggest how the new functionality should work)
selected 'Display Reconciled Transactions' or not, the outstanding balance should be the same.
Best regards,
Michael

Bapi's do not set sy-subrc. The only way to check if it was succesfull is to loop into the return table for error messages:
You have to use BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT after calling BAPI_PO_CREATE1:
    READ TABLE errmsg TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS
                        WITH KEY type = c_e.
    IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
        EXPORTING
          wait = c_x.
ENDIF.

Cross Tab Report not matching Data from report

I created a report showing the number of orders created by each department per year for the last 5 years. I double checked the data, and 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 all are correct.
I then created a cross-tab for quick reference for my department head. 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009 are all correct. 2008 is not. It shows 500 more orders than the data in the report for that year.
I double checked my "Group options" to make sure that they were the same in both the data and in the crosstabs. Any idea what I could be missing?
Thank you.

Try this, limit the report to only 2008, show details, add date to detail section, and add the record number (From special fields)
see if this count matches what you think it should be, or is 500 over like the crosstab indicates. You could group by date, by month, add a summary (Count) by date, and see what that comes up to. If your extra records fall in a certain date range, double check the database to make sure there are not duplicate records.

F.01 & KE80 Report not match Value

Hi Expert,
We have made KE80 report as well F.01 FSV but while check both T.Code F.01 is giving Correct Information but Ke80 report giving Less amount then F.01. note : I have copied from KE5B as advice by Ravi Sankar Veena posted date 4th of June 2009.
but value is still same, wht should i do in this case. in F.01 m unable to access Dril Down Report. kindly help me.
Regards
Pranav

Hi Pranav
Blessed are those who have FI / EC-PCA reconciled
Even SAP has accepted in one of it notes that PCA is not intended to reconcile with FI.. Reasons are many and this thread would fall short for it..
For P&L accounts - It would reconcile because PC is derived from CO objects like CC.. So, where your GL is a cost element, you can relax
For B/S accounts - Its a night mare. Especially, when you do F.5D, there is no guarantee that the Splitted amount would match the original amount
Because of these reasons, New GL PCA was introduced
Br. Ajay M

Opening vs closing balance of the bank does not match

Hi expert,
I have loaded 2 bank statements via transaction FF_5. (for Spain)
When looking at transaction FEBA, I see that the opening balance of today is not the same as the closing balance of yesterday.
What could be the problem?
Thank you for providing your feedback.
Kind regards,
Linda

Good morning,
Thank you.
It seems that both bank statements are the same, with the same value date
How can it be that 2 statements which have the same values can be loaded?
The ID in FEBA is different.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Linda

Reports not matching

Hi Group,
The actuals standard line item report FMRP_RFFMEP1AX / program RFFMEPGAX does not have the same dollar value for purchase requisitions as the budget report FMRP_2FMB4002 / program RFMDUMON
Any ideas or suggestions? Please let me know
Thanks,

We started having this problem with some of the reps after migrating from the old CAD servers to new CAD servers. Since the new system didn’t have the updated RASCAL DB, I thought the reports have the stale data. I was under the impression that it gets cleared after a day(once CSD has a fresh data) but seems like that’s not the case. I didn’t get time to look into this further and have requested TAC to help me on this.
-Sunil

SPANISH BANK STATEMENT DETAIL REPORT NOT SHOWING TRANSACTIONS

We are having issue where the spanish version of a oracle report(RDF) is not showing some columns on the right side of the report
whereas the english version is showing all the columns.
We have checked the data,lookups and the trace files but they do not show any issue.
Please help.

Hi;
I suggest log a SR for your issue
Regard
Helios

Trial Balance - Encumbrance & Encumbrance Details Report not matching

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for