F-32 Due Date issue
In SAP ECC6.0, we use F-28 to apply payments from customers. We do not apply that payment to an invoie and leave the payment on account.
The accounting clerk then clears customr open items (invoices and payments) using F-32. For partial payments, they claear the original invoice nad payment documets and use residul amount as a new open item.
The problem is that if we put the original baseline date on the residual item, the due date does not get calculated as per payment terms. The due date becomes baseline date. If the original invoice's baseline date is Apr 30, payment terms is 15, the original document has due date of May 15. However, in residual, when they enter baseline date as Apr 30, terms as 15, the due date remains Apr 30. To counter this, we have asked them to put the baseline date as due date of the original document. When that happens, due date is right but the aging is wrong.
Help...
Check customer tolerance group configuration. Mark field "payment term from invoice" as checked in residual section.
This will transfer baseline date and terms from original item to residual item and calculate due date accordingly.
Similar Messages
-
IOS 5 reminders due date issues
Hi
I'm having some trouble with the Reminders app in iOS 5. In iCal on my mac with OS X Lion I set some reminders with a due date. All these reminders sync well, but there are 2 issues in the app itself:
1. I can't sort the list of reminders by due date.. is this even possible?
2. When i add a reminder on my ipod touch, there's no option to add a due date.. what's going on here?
thanks in advance!
TimI, too, am having frustrating issues with my reminders. It's a clumsy application. I am a person that lives by my "to do" list. I don't necessarily need a "reminder" but I do need a To Do list & I have to be able to repeatedly change the due date on my tasks. For example "Take vitamins" (daily). Or sometimes I just don't get to something that day and move it to the next day. On my MacBook in iCal I have no trouble setting them up and moving them around. But creating them on the iPhone is annoying - you can't get to "due date" easily & also there is something really strange where the iCal reminders doesn't require to pick a "time" it's due, just a day it's due & then the reminder . . . but on the phone it makes you pick a time. Gargh! I had a To Do list task that I was pretty happy with. But I switched over to this so that I could integrate with Siri. I hope they fix this soon so that it is more user friendly.
-
I've been using Reminders for IOS 5 and Lion, and have been having trouble changing the due dates in Lion (and in iOS, for that matter). I open the reminders in iCal, and edit the due date, but when I close/save the reminder, the due date remains the same. Has anyone else found this issue, and does anyone have a suggestion of how to remedy (if possible)?
Thank you.I am also experiencing this. In ICloud I can edit the due date of a reminder. As you say in ICal the date changes back to the original due date that was entered in IOS 5. Can't figure what the difference is or why it happens. Hoping for some help too.
-
Issue in Due date analysis report S_ALR_87012168
Hi Friends,
We have a strange issue regarding due date analysis report (S_ALR_87012168)...
When i execute this report it displays different amounts in "Not Due" column under 0-30 bucket. In 0-30 bucket, under not due column it shows 10,000 and under total open items column it shows 15,000. How it is possible?
Thanks to everyone
AnifiHi,
This has been closed due to Local and Document currency prob...
Thanks -
Lockbox Issue with payment on exact day as Cash Discount Days 1 Due Date
Dear Gurus
We are running into an issue in as much as when we receive a payment against our Lockbox on the exact day as the Cash Discount Days 1 due date the system posts this as an on account posting as opposed to applying the cash against the open receivable and posting the difference to the Cash Discount Account.
E.g. Invoice 10000 Payment term 34 days 2% Net 35. I created the AR invoice today with invoice date and posting date of Oct 9, 2009 and posted the same. Received payment $ 9800 on Lockbox file today Nov 12 using the BAI2 format Lockbox file and found that the system did not even show the invoice # on the Lockbox reports but it recognized the customer based on the MICR # and posted an on account payment. It gave the error" F5 263 Difference too large for Clearing"
The users have prior complained that this situation arises in F-28 as well where they would have to force the discount instead of the system recognizing the same if cash was being applied on the same date as the Cash discount Days 1 due date.
Any help in this regards will be geratly appreciated and points awarded.
Regards
Satpal NarangHi Satpal,
Please check the net due date of the document which you are trying to do the payment. As it is critical information to calculate the cash discount.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni -
Special G/L indicator - Due on date issue
When I am posting to a vendor with Special Gl indicator, system is asking me to put DUE ON date. Whereas when we post to a vendor (without special GL indicator) FB60, standard behaviour of the system is to calculate Due On date based on the baseline line date and payment term defaulted.
I have checked the field status of the posting key attached with Special G/L indicator, and I have also checked the field status group of the alternative reconciliation account attached with the Special G/l indicator. Due date, payment term are in optional status. We are using standard posting key 29 and 39
And I have also checked the payment term in the vendor master
Please advice how can we default or let the system calculate this Due On date for vendor posting with special G/L indicator. We don't want to manually enter this Due On date like any other vendor posting without special G/L indicator. Or atleast want to know the reason why system is asking us to manually enter the Due ON date in case of vendor posting with special G/L
Thanks.
Ron
Edited by: Ron on Mar 13, 2010 5:53 AM
Edited by: Ron on Mar 14, 2010 3:00 AM
Edited by: Ron on Mar 15, 2010 8:15 AMHi Srinivasa,
My question is when I am posting an invocie to a vendor (FB60), Due On date is automatically calculated based on the defaulted baseline date and the payment term in the vendor master. But when I am posting the invocie to the same vendor with Special G/L indicator, Due On date is not automatically calculated and system is expecting me to enter this date manually. Is there a way we can default this Due On date based on payment term like it happens when posting to other invoices without Sp Gl indicator?
Thanks
Ron -
How to generate 3 payment due dates& 3 posting against single invoice?
Hello Experts,
Kindly provides some inputs on below requirement.
For example :- In the Utility Bill,
Consumption months: June, July, August
Meter Reading taken in August
Billing Months: September, October, November
Bill generated in August
Consumer receives the bill on September month
Payment Due dates: 12 Sep 2009, 12 Oct 2009 and 12 Nov 2009
Issues-:
1.How to generate three posting against single invoice?
2.How to generate three payment due dates for above postings in three consecutive months since payment due date logic is incremental in nature here, e.g.
1st due date = posting date + 15 days
2nd due date = 1st due date + 30 days
3rd due date = 2nd due date + 30 days
Requirement description:-
The utility generates bill quarterly for domestic consumers. For such consumers, the utility takes reading from the consumers premises after end of consumption period (quarterly ) and generates bill on the 1st billing month (here 1st billing month is September).
In the bill the utility divides total consumption into three parts (considering each part for each consumption month) and calculates all charge heads separately on each part. It however, consolidates and generates a single bill having three rows, each row showing charge heads of each consumption month and also net and gross amount to be given for each consumption month.
Moreover, three postings have to be generated in FICA against that single bill. Also, it provides three due dates to the consumer, each date falling in each billing month, to pay the above three net amounts respectively. Dunning and other activities should be triggered if the consumer fails to pay the stipulated amount by corresponding due date.
Looking forward for valuable suggestions
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Vaseem
Moderator note - question reposted - OP notified of violation Issue on quarterly bill
Edited by: William Eastman on Jun 3, 2010 3:25 PM
Edited by: William Eastman on Jun 3, 2010 5:01 PMHello Experts,
Kindly provides some inputs on below requirement.
For example :- In the Utility Bill,
Consumption months: June, July, August
Meter Reading taken in August
Billing Months: September, October, November
Bill generated in August
Consumer receives the bill on September month
Payment Due dates: 12 Sep 2009, 12 Oct 2009 and 12 Nov 2009
Issues-:
1.How to generate three posting against single invoice?
2.How to generate three payment due dates for above postings in three consecutive months since payment due date logic is incremental in nature here, e.g.
1st due date = posting date + 15 days
2nd due date = 1st due date + 30 days
3rd due date = 2nd due date + 30 days
Requirement description:-
The utility generates bill quarterly for domestic consumers. For such consumers, the utility takes reading from the consumers premises after end of consumption period (quarterly ) and generates bill on the 1st billing month (here 1st billing month is September).
In the bill the utility divides total consumption into three parts (considering each part for each consumption month) and calculates all charge heads separately on each part. It however, consolidates and generates a single bill having three rows, each row showing charge heads of each consumption month and also net and gross amount to be given for each consumption month.
Moreover, three postings have to be generated in FICA against that single bill. Also, it provides three due dates to the consumer, each date falling in each billing month, to pay the above three net amounts respectively. Dunning and other activities should be triggered if the consumer fails to pay the stipulated amount by corresponding due date.
Looking forward for valuable suggestions
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Vaseem
Moderator note - question reposted - OP notified of violation Issue on quarterly bill
Edited by: William Eastman on Jun 3, 2010 3:25 PM
Edited by: William Eastman on Jun 3, 2010 5:01 PM -
Due date for BoEx is not picked up by payment programme RFFOF_V??
Hi!
I would be most grateful for your help/advise on my problem;
I have a French customer for which I have set up BoEx with payment method 4 -LCR non accepté with payment programme RFFOF_V, as it is compliant with the bank's file specification "AFB-CONFB pour le virement et prelevement par fichiers".
File is generated according to bank file specification (and accepted by bank), but I am having problems with the due date of BoEx since it is not picked up by payment programme when running trx F110. Instead issue date is picked up by file.
What do I need to do/change in order for file to pick up BoEx due date instead of issue date?
It should be possible to run F110 and group items so that file picks up information on due date instead of issue date so that bank does not withdraw money from customer bank account before BoEx due date..or??
At least it was possible for payment method 2 LCR magnétique and payment method 4 does not seem that different.
Ex.
Trx: F110
Posting date: 2014.04.08
Docs entered up to: 2014.04.08
Customer items due by: 2014.04.30
Pmt method:4
Next pmt: 20140501
B.ex/pmt request > Issue date=2014.04.08
B.ex/pmt request>Items Due by=2014.04.30
B.ex/pmt request>Incoming pmt due by=2014.04.30
Config settings for paying company code:
Bill/exch pymt: X
One bill of exch. per due date period: X
Latest due date in: 90 days
Bill on demand for due date up until:- (blank)
Payment method 4: Create BoEX before due date.
Any information that could help me resolve my problem is highly appreciated.
Kind regards
LindaDear Ramana,
I am really thank to you for your kind answer.
With your guidence, i could able to solve this problem, but i would ask you one question.
Why this sales order is not updated in VEPVG table? Does the data in this table will archieve after some time. if yes what is that particular time.
Onemore thing, my understanding on delivery due list VL10C, that system will not pick those sales order for which the delivery date is older than one month. i,e if the sales order in created in the month of september and has the delivery date as 29.08.2010 then system will not pick up this sales order.
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Once again i am really thank you for your great help.
Warm Regards,
Sridhar Burugula -
Hi All
There is a request to change the net due date at the report FBL5N : if the net due date is on a weekend or holiday, it is necessary to change it to the next business day..
I realized that this field is calculated using FM DETERMINE_DUE_DATE (when running FBL5n).
Questions:
- Is it possible to change this date as requested? If yes, is it an ABAP issue?
- Modifying this net due date at this point, may affect the integrity of other reports or transactions?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
GaiaHI,
As per SAP standard, it is not possible to link the due date calculation
to a calendar so as to avoid having the due date fall on a holiday or
weekend. There is no provision in standard SAP to enable this.
Only for automatic payment and dunning purposes, you can use a calendar
to avoid payments on Saturdays, Sundays, and Holidays. Please see
customizing transaction OBBA.
One suggestion could be to use the substitution functionality, where
you can substitute and change several fields from BKPF and BSEG. By a
user exit you will calculate the adequate baseline date to avoid due
date on Saturdays, Sundays or Holidays.
Regards
Madhu M -
AP PAYABLES- Not getting all the DUE DATE's in with split schedule payments
Hello All,
We have some issues with AP Data loading's into our DW from EBS 11.5.10 AP - PAYABLES.
One of our customer is using split schedule and share payment into few payment. Our
sql is not reading all the due dates for PAYABLES.
We are using PAYMENT_NUM=1 from ap_payment_schedules_all table as condition to load the Data to avoid duplicate rows coming for Payables.
Some hints: removing the "PAYMENT_NUM=1" from the where clause gives all the due_dates but then we have duplicate rows for Payables.
Please help to modify our query so that it will work for split schedule payment.
select
inv.invoice_num,
inv.doc_sequence_value,
sob.currency_code,
inv.invoice_date,
'EH'||inv.vendor_id vendor_id,
'EH'||inv.vendor_site_id vendor_site_id,
ael.ae_line_number distribution_line_number,
inv.invoice_currency_code,
aeh.accounting_date,
'EH'||ael.code_combination_id code_combination_id,
nvl(ael.entered_dr,0)-nvl(ael.entered_cr,0) accounted,
nvl(ael.accounted_dr,0)-nvl(ael.accounted_cr,0) amount,
fuser.user_name,
fuser2.user_name user_name2,
inv.payment_status_flag,
'PAYABLES' rowtype,
inv.discount_amount_taken,
inv.invoice_type_lookup_code invoice_type,
inv.exchange_rate,
inv.exchange_date,
tax.name,
inv.source,
inv.attribute6 eflow_doc_id,
sysdate transfer_date,
sch.hold_flag,
inv.cancelled_date,
sch.due_date
from
ap.ap_invoices_all inv,
apps.ap_ae_headers_all aeh,
apps.ap_ae_lines_all ael,
ap.ap_tax_codes_all tax,
ap.ap_payment_schedules_all sch,
gl.gl_sets_of_books sob,
applsys.fnd_user fuser,
applsys.fnd_user fuser2
where
aeh.ae_header_id=ael.ae_header_id and
inv.set_of_books_id=sob.set_of_books_id and
inv.invoice_id=sch.invoice_id and
sch.payment_num*1=1 and ---------------------------------------------- *
fuser.user_id=inv.last_updated_by and
fuser2.user_id=inv.created_by and
ael.tax_code_id=tax.tax_id(+) and
ael.ae_line_type_code='LIABILITY' and
inv.invoice_id=ael.source_id and
ael.source_table='AP_INVOICES' and
aeh.gl_transfer_flag='Y'
Thanks,
AmanHello All,
We have some issues with AP Data loading's into our DW from EBS 11.5.10 AP - PAYABLES.
One of our customer is using split schedule and share payment into few payment. Our
sql is not reading all the due dates for PAYABLES.
We are using PAYMENT_NUM=1 from ap_payment_schedules_all table as condition to load the Data to avoid duplicate rows coming for Payables.
Some hints: removing the "PAYMENT_NUM=1" from the where clause gives all the due_dates but then we have duplicate rows for Payables.
Please help to modify our query so that it will work for split schedule payment.
select
inv.invoice_num,
inv.doc_sequence_value,
sob.currency_code,
inv.invoice_date,
'EH'||inv.vendor_id vendor_id,
'EH'||inv.vendor_site_id vendor_site_id,
ael.ae_line_number distribution_line_number,
inv.invoice_currency_code,
aeh.accounting_date,
'EH'||ael.code_combination_id code_combination_id,
nvl(ael.entered_dr,0)-nvl(ael.entered_cr,0) accounted,
nvl(ael.accounted_dr,0)-nvl(ael.accounted_cr,0) amount,
fuser.user_name,
fuser2.user_name user_name2,
inv.payment_status_flag,
'PAYABLES' rowtype,
inv.discount_amount_taken,
inv.invoice_type_lookup_code invoice_type,
inv.exchange_rate,
inv.exchange_date,
tax.name,
inv.source,
inv.attribute6 eflow_doc_id,
sysdate transfer_date,
sch.hold_flag,
inv.cancelled_date,
sch.due_date
from
ap.ap_invoices_all inv,
apps.ap_ae_headers_all aeh,
apps.ap_ae_lines_all ael,
ap.ap_tax_codes_all tax,
ap.ap_payment_schedules_all sch,
gl.gl_sets_of_books sob,
applsys.fnd_user fuser,
applsys.fnd_user fuser2
where
aeh.ae_header_id=ael.ae_header_id and
inv.set_of_books_id=sob.set_of_books_id and
inv.invoice_id=sch.invoice_id and
sch.payment_num*1=1 and ---------------------------------------------- *
fuser.user_id=inv.last_updated_by and
fuser2.user_id=inv.created_by and
ael.tax_code_id=tax.tax_id(+) and
ael.ae_line_type_code='LIABILITY' and
inv.invoice_id=ael.source_id and
ael.source_table='AP_INVOICES' and
aeh.gl_transfer_flag='Y'
Thanks,
Aman -
The Credit Memo & Original Invoice do not have the same net due date.
The issue is that for returns of goods from the customer, the credit memo that gets created does not have the same net due date as the original invoice. To accomplish this, in the credit memo, the indicator "V" must be entered in the credit memo field BSEG-REBZG "Invoice Ref". This will make the credit memo due based on the payment terms. In the OSS message 50388, SAP identifies a user exit in SDVFX008 which will fill field BSEG-REBZG with the value "V". Doing this should automatically make the credit memo for returns due the same date as the original invoice.SAP says to do the following:
The function module called by SDVFX008 is EXIT_SAPLV60B_008
Make the ABAP coding in include program ZXVVFU08.
Populate field ACCIT-REBZG with "V"
Despite doing this , we couldnt get the same net due date as the credit memo & Original invoice.
Can anyone help? POINTS WILL BE GIVEN.
Thanks
AnitaHi Anitha,
Does the value 'V' gets paopulated?.
I mean to ask whether the program goes into the user exit logic?.
Please let me know.
Thank you.
Regards,
Karun M -
CRM 5.0 ERMS - Setting Priority, Due Date etc of Incoming Email
Hi Gurus
We've moved our incoming e-mail processing from a Non-ERMS set-up to an ERMS set-up.
Previously we were able to assign the Priority & Due Date for Incoming Emails in Transaction.
SPRO -> IMG -> Customer Relationship Management -> Interaction Center Webclient -> Agent Inbox -> Settings for Asynchronous Inbound Processing ->
Define Receiving E-mail/Fax Settings
Now with E-mails coming through via ERMS we have the following issues:
Priority is set to Medium when we require High
Due Date is set to 31/12/2099 when we require 24 hours from arrival into ERMS
Responsible Group is Blank when it should be the assigned Org Unit.
Is this something that is controlled throught the Rule Modeler, if so how?
Maximum points for the correct answer here.
Many Thanks in advance
PandurangaHi,
Yes you have to do settings in rule modeler, please go through the following link for ERMS and rule modeler and if you are still not able to solve let me know.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/83/0a94734da3439fabcd079cee3f3c72/frameset.htm
Regards,
Deepak
I think you need to do these settings in Transaction CRMC_IC_AUIGNADR
Edited by: Deepak Ahuja on May 14, 2008 4:15 PM -
Due date to be kept optional at the time of F-04
Hi
I am facing an issue which could have a simple solution but i have tried almost everything. I am clearing a vendor balance with F-04. The doc type is KZ and the posting key is 29. The special G/L indicator is 4( which is customized). Now when i go to the next screen, the due date is mandatory. Now my issue is tht i dont want it to be mandatory as I am preparing a BDC for this. I have checked the field status of the posting key, the vendor recon a/c as well as the special G/L account. All are optional. Plzz guide me if I am missing something........
When i am changing the document type to SA or when i change the Sp G/L indicator to A, this works fine.
By the way, we have document splitting active. But i dont think it has any effect on this issue.Hi Vishal,
Actually system wont ask u in common the due date, alternatively it is calculated dynamically comparing CPU_date( Current date ) and the Baseline date in original Document taking into account the payment terms assigned to the concerned vendor or customer.
But here the baseline date is nothing but the due date.
I advice u to write a substitution at calling point 2 as doc type KZ and Spl GL Ind 4 then the due date fileld will be some date.
I hope this will solve ur problem.
Purnachandra RM -
How to call Background CO in Due Date
Hi All,
We have a scenario, where we need escalate a workitem from one person's UWL to another person's UWL.. The Escalation has to happen only when the due date is reached.
Notification CO is working fine with respect to our scenario, but we want to call a webdynpro background CO there. when we try to call Webdynpro CO, no action is happening.
What is the reason behind this?. Is there any work around for this?
Regards,
Krishnaveni.Hi Krishnaveni,
Only background callable object can be used for notifications and due date. You need to put the implementation of your callable object, which implement the IGPBackgroundCallableObject interface in a library like for any other background callable object.
I'm not sure that a Web Dynpro background CO can exists because of the layering and class loading issues.
To be sure that it works, you can test the background callable object in standalone mode in the Design Time.
Hope this helps,
Best regards.
David -
Wrong due date on vendor invoices
Hi SAP Gurus,
I am facing one issue in due date calculation for Vendor open item.
I have maintained terms of payment in vendor master data in which invoice due date should be 30 days after invoice generation. But this terms of payment is not picked automatically in vendor invoices (it is blank) and system is considering all the open items for payment during Automatic Payment Program.
Need your help to understand why system is not picking terms of payment automatically in vendor invoices when it is already there in vendor master data.
Many thanks for all your help.
Regards,
SATVIR SINGHHi,
In invoice is posted through MIRO then terms of payment applied in purchase organization segment of vendor master data has top priority over one which is entered in company code segment.
For items posted directly in FI terms of payment in company code segment is considered.
Moreover if some one edits default terms of payment at the time of invoice then terms of payment entered at the time or payment will be updated in vendor invoice or line items.
If no term s of payment is entered in vendor line item then invoice is due immediately on the base line date of invoice.
Also check document change log in tcode FB04 to ensure terms of payment is not edited after document is posted.
Next payment date you enter while secluding the payment run is important thing to consider for payment to consider in current payment run.
Thanks!
Raju
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to find no of docs in a library using RIDC
Hi , I want to generate a report which will give the result like" "No of documents uploaded in a particular library for the month of january" How can i achieve it using RIDC. Thanks, Chely
-
Hello Experts, I am using query designer BI 7 version, Created a query and have used 2 filters, My question on exection in web, the filltered values come in the corner and no longer the columns are seen in the structure.. Is there a setting to retain
-
Quality in Pro Training Series
I'm working with
-
Retreiving zip file attachement
Hi, How can I read a zip file attachment that is sent inline in the message? thanks, dannyy
-
Suggestion: App store search by user rating! Am I alone?
When I search for apps on the iTunes app store, there's typically so many that I want to see the ones that are rated the highest first. Am I alone in this view? At the very least there should be an option to sort the list. Google became the king of s