FAGLL03 report not filtering G/L line items based on vendor entered in free selection
Hello SAPians,
I have a requirement to add Vendor field in the free(dynamic) selection of the standard report FAGLL03 so that G/L line items are displayed(filtered) based on the vendor values given.
I followed the SAP note 945932 to create the vendor field by adding the ZZLIFNR in the custom include of the table FLAGFLEXA followed by the configuration of custom fields in SPRO tcode. Post that I tested the report by giving one particular vendor number and came to know that no line items were displayed.
Upon debugging the program I came to know that , while selecting the data from the Inner join of BSIS and FLAGFLEXA tables, vendor number on FLAGFLEXA forms the part of WHERE clause and eventually no records are selected since all the existing records wont be having vendor number maintained in FLAGFLEXA table.
However I asked the functional guy to post the new line items under the assumption that it might update ZZLIFNR field in FLAGFLEXA. But our assumption turned out to be wrong. At this point I seek advice from your experience on the following points.
1) My understanding that failing of inner join condition is the root cause for data being not fetched in the output. Is it correct?
2) When we add new custom field in FLAGFLEXA(ZZLIFNR in my case), how the data needs to be populated for that particular field from functional/technical perspective? Does the custom scenarios in SPRO are related to this in anyway?
3) How do we need to handle the old records existing in the system with respect to the updation of new field(column) added?
Any inputs in this regard is very much appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Yaseen
Hello Dennis,
thanks for the tip, your assumption is right, it's regarding 0FIGL_V40 in BI 7.0. Could you please be more detailed, which BW 3.x InfoSource do you mean? Or what exactly has to be done?
The "objects" under this InfoCube are - transformation, datasource (0FI_GL_40) and InfoPackage, that's it. When I check InfoCube Type/Namespace - it is based on Data Transfer Process for DirectAccess, but the checkbox With InfoSource 3.x is not checked..
Thank you in advance for your answer.
Regards,
Peter
Similar Messages
-
GL Custom Reports not displaying source and line item Data after Upgrade
Hi,
I am having this issue even though General Ledger Journal Entry Summarization is set to "No Summarization" and in SLA the Line Type is set in detail for Transfer to GL. Have you come accross a specfic example like this? Can you please guide me to what the problem may be?
None of the GL reports is showing the Source and Line Item details.
Thanks,
ArunI am having this issue even though General Ledger Journal Entry Summarization is set to "No Summarization" and in SLA the Line Type is set in detail for Transfer to GL. Have you come accross a specfic example like this? Can you please guide me to what the problem may be?
None of the GL reports is showing the Source and Line Item details.Have you verified the queries of those reports after the upgrade? And, when you say upgrade, do you mean from 11i to R12?
Did you set the application context properly?
How to set the Organization Context in R12? [ID 437119.1]
Oracle Applications Multiple Organizations Access Control for Custom Code [ID 420787.1]
SQL Queries and Multi-Org Architecture in Release 12 [ID 462383.1]
Setting APPS Context is mandatory step while loading data using public APIs [ID 473615.1]
Thanks,
Hussein -
Changes in MM02 not reflecting in COPA lin item report
Hi,
In my project during data conversion material was grouped wrongly. We realised it later once we started designing COPA reports. The material is used by seven company codes. The basic material group defined in basic data is used by all company codes while Material group 1,2,3 4 and 5 are used by company specific defined in sales orgs 2 View in MM master(MM01).
I am designing report for three companies by using material group 1,2,3,4 and 5.
We tried changing the material group 1,2,3,4 and 5 for wrongly grouped materials in MM02. But in COPA report these changes are not reflecting. The grouping in report is still as per the data conversion grouping.
Please suggest on how should we rectify our material grouping to reflect in COPA report.
RegdsHi,
in COPA reports characteristics are read from the COPA tables, they are not dynamically derived at the time of executing the report. In the COPA tables oyu will find the characteristic as derived at the moment of posting the line item.
If the characeristic that you want to rectify is in the definition of your your COPA segments - which you can check through TC KEQ3 - then there is possibility to carry changed master data over to past COPA data.
TC KEND allows you change the existing COPA segments according to current master data. However, it will not make changes to table CE1XXXX, where COPA line items are stored, but changes happen on the segment level (CE4XXXX).
This means that you always see the changes in COPA reports that read from segments, but not in line item based reports.
To change your output from line item based reports I see no other possibilty but to make correcting entries in CE1XXXX using KE21N or KEFC.
If you should consider using KEND please read the documentation for "realignment". It can create problems, for example if you have a SAP BW that is delta-updated from CE11XXX. Also your summarization levels for COPA have to be rebuilt after KEND. -
Is there any report to see GL account line items.
Hi Experts,
Is there any report to see GL account line items. if the line item management is not selected in GL account.
Regards
SAM.
Edited by: samiuk on Jun 27, 2010 9:32 PMHello,
The reports to see GL line items are fbl3n ( classic GL ) and FAGLL03 ( New GL).
If the line item management is NOT flagged in the Master data of the account you'll not see any line items. The line item management flag determines if the document will create entries in the secondary index tables (BSIS/BSAS) which are used to display the line items.
REgards,
REnan -
FS10N balance not tie with FBl3N line item totals
Hi
I searched the forum for posting on FS10N and FBL3N incorrect balances and I did not any post appropriate for my issue. Hence I am posting my issue here.
For a particular month, say 072010, FS10N GL balance does not tie with FBL3N line item totals. I am not sure why. In our case, we did not archive any line items and this is not related to year end carry forward. Year beginning GL balances look fine. We dont have any negative postings. Only few GL balances are off. We are using 4.7 version.
Do you know why this inconsistency and how to rectify it? Is there any program which I run apart from Yead End carry forward?
any ideas really appreciated.
ThanksHello
We have already this trouble.
To correct it you need to proceed like this (when NewGL is not activate, with new Gl there is one new programm)
Without newGL
- Block account to be posted (transaction FS00 Block for posting in the company view)
- Delete open item, by using the programm RFSEPA03 (you need to adapt it by a copy because if you don't you can't run it), also this programm will unflag your account in the company view
- Delete line item by the standrd program RFSEPA04
- Create the line item by the standard program RFSEPA01
- if this account is managed by open item, run the programm RFSEPA02 (you need to do the same adjustement of the RFSEPA03)
With NewGL, there is something new. the program RFSEPA02 is linked with a new transaction and you don't have to adjust it FAGL_ACTIVATE_OP. The difference is when you create the open item, you have to define the default profit center and default value depending of the customizing of the leading ledger.
BBest regards
Philippe,
Thanks for the rewards. -
Not able to delete line items using BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE
Hi,
Not able to delete line items of a delivery using BAPI 'BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE', with thte below code and even return parameter has zero messages.
I have even checked existing below posting.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/logon?redirect=http%3a%2f%2fforums.sdn.sap.com%2fthread.jspa%3fthreadid%3d782509
Below is the code that i am using.........
*wa1-deliv_numb = wa_lips-vbeln.
wa1-deliv_item = wa_lips-posnr.
APPEND wa1 to item_data.
wa-deliv_numb = vbeln_so .
wa-deliv_item = l_item.
wa-del_item = 'X'.
APPEND wa TO item_control.
w_header_data-deliv_numb = vbeln_so .
w_header_control-deliv_numb = vbeln_so .
w_delivery = vbeln_so .
*w_header_control-dlv_del = 'X'. "Delete whole Delivery
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE'
EXPORTING
header_data = w_header_data
header_control = w_header_control
delivery = w_delivery
TABLES
item_data = item_data
item_control = item_control
return = return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
wait = 'X'.
I have even tried uncommenting item_data parameter but not able to delete line item.....i am able to delete whole delivery but not line items .........can any one of u help me in resolving this issiue plz ???
Regards,
M, ManoharKindly use WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE to delete the items
Sample code:
L_VBKOK-VBELN_VL = vbeln_so.
clear l_vbpok.
refresh l_vbpok.
l_vbpok-vbeln_vl = vbeln_so
l_vbpok-posnr_vl = wa_deliv_item.
l_vbpok-lips_del = c_x.
append l_vbpok.
set update task local.
call function 'WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE'
exporting
vbkok_wa = l_vbkok
commit = ' '
delivery = lv_delivery
tables
vbpok_tab = l_vbpok
exceptions
others = 0.
commit work and wait. -
Standard report for FI Special Ledger Line Item report
is there any standard report for FI Special Ledger Line Item report
Hi
GD23 for Display of SPL Document
GD13 for Trail Balance of SPL
GCAC for Ledger Comparision
GVTR Balance Carry forward in SPl.
Assign Points if useful. -
Document should not splitt to tax line items
Hi,
Document should not splitt for tax line items,currently it is happining how contol this.
Thanks and RegHi,
Then in the document splitting configuration, you can remove the base item category for this TAx Item Category.
Regards,
SDNer -
Condition type not appearing in PO line item
Dear All
I made a condition type Y001 for agriculture tax with below mentioned config. and marked as both header and item condition.
Cond. class A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category B Delivery costs
Manual entries C Manual entry has priority
Now problem is that when I am making contract in contract line item condition Y001 condition is appearing in dropdown and I am able to enter the same in contract and save it.But when I am trying to make a PO by referring the same contract with line item condition Y001, this same condition is not appearing in PO and also it is not appearing in dropdown also so that I can manually enter the same.
Please let me know why system is behaving like this.
Regards
SKsatish kumar wrote:
In short condition type Y001 is appearing in contract line item condition tab while making contract but same condition is not appearing in PO line item condition tab while making PO.
Hi Satish,
Perhaps you have not assigned the pricing procedure to the Purchasing Orgn & Vendor in IMG Schema determination. Have a chk once and if you have assigned try maintaining a PIR and I hope it should populate the priceing procedure and your cond type Y001 in the PO also.
Anything pls revert
Regards
Shiva -
Not able to display line item 20 in contract
I could not able to display line item 20 in the contract document.
line item 10 and 30is there however there is no line item 30. What could be reason and how to enable the same.
MRSIt may also possible if user forgot to enter the line item 20 and jump to line item 30 after 10 as below.
Then system will show as like this -
COPA Realignments for line item based reports
Hi Guru
I built two CO-PA line item based reports in our environment. Now , there are some organizational changes in our environment and Now I have re-derive a characteristic from customer master data. Does those changes reflect in my line item based reports, If i run Re-Alignments (KEND)?
Thanks in advanceLine item reports (defined w/KE91) will reflect the realignment. Line item display (KE24/KE25) will give you the choice of reading the original posting or the realigned data.
-
Line-item based profitability report (CO-PA)
Hi SAP community,
when I run KE24 i can select the "Mode of access"
Read acc. to current structure ==> Realignment changes are included
Read as posted ==> Realignment changes are excluded
When I create a line-item based CO-PA report (KE91), do I have the same functionality, do either include or exclude realignments?
Thanks in advance,When I do a realignment and run a line item based report afterwards, the reports picks up the realigned value.
I havent seen any setting during the report setup where I could potentially define if the realigned or the original value should be picked.
So I assume SAP always selects the realigned values from the segment table in case of a line item based report -
System should not allow to add line items in delivery
Hi,
1) system should not allow to add line items in delivery( in reference to sales order or STO)
2) sales order/STO should not be changed if delivery exists
how to control the above
AlecHi Lakxmi,
I found answer for 1st point from you are old answers.
can you throw somelight on 2nd point.
Thanks
Anil -
Hi All,
I have line item based approval workflow WS14500015. My shopping cart has multiple line items each awaiting approval from multiple approvers.
Now my requirement is when any approver approves his line items , that particular line items should not be allowed for changes even though the shopping cart has status awaiting approval coz others line items are still awaiting approval .
Is this possible i.e user should be able to make changes to unapproved line items abut not approved line items .
Can i user badi BBP_WFL_SECURE_BADI for this ?? Please if anyone has already done this please share your inputs .
Thanks in advance
Iftekhar AlamHi Alam,
have you checked the APPROVAL_HISTORY_TABLE and ITEM_APPROVAL_HISTORY_TABLE? Here you will receive information on already approved items and the current approval process.
Kind regards,
Thomas -
Completion and approval workflows in line item based SC approval scenario
Hi SRM experts,
We are on SRM 7 ECS , support pack SAPKIBKV08
We are designing line item based SC approval workflow. We also have completion workflow. i.e after requester creates a shopping cart, it goes to buyer as per completion workflow( if the SC does not have price , vendor or has a free text) , and then after the completion workflow, it goes to main SC approval workflow.
My questions are :
1. If a requester creates 2 line items in SC , and 1 line item does not have price/vendor/or material , whereas 2nd line item has price/vendor/ and material , can we send onlt the 1st line item to completion workflow and not send the 2nd line item in the completion workflow but directly to SC approval workflow ? OR we have to send the entire cart to the completion workflow ?
2. After the completion and the approval workflow , if line item 1 is approved, can it create a PO , whereas the 2nd line be still in approval . i.e do all the cart items need to be approved before creating POs or as and when individual line items get approved , they can create thier own POs
Rgds
SumendraHi Sumedra,
Which workflow are you using - application or process contrlled workflow?
Assuming you are using process-controlled workflow - I will answer following questions -
1. Can offline approval be used for item based shopping cart approval workflow?
- Yes, it can be used !
2. Can different line items be sent by mail to different mail boxes?
Yes
3. Will 1 manager see all the 10 line items OR only the 1 line item for which he is responsible?
1 manager can 'see' all the items but he can only approve or reject the item that he is suppose to act on. All other item will be grayed out. However, this behaviour is configuarable !
4. If he will get only line for which he is responsible , and once he clicks on approve , will this approval apply to his line item only , OR it will apply to all the 10 line items ?
- see above
Regards,
Amit
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I sync music from an external drive to my itunes library?
Hello, All my files (music, films etc) are stored on an external hard drive. I've set the drive as my iTunes Media Folder in preferences. How do you import all the files into my iTunes library? Thanks!
-
[Rookie] Some clarification on Dimension Table
Hi! I am preparing for BW certification, and sorry to post this very basic query. On certification notes, I came accross a statement that says - "Dimension table contains link to fact table and SID table". I think this statement is wrong. Dimension t
-
The url of the website that I'm visiting used to show in the url box when I opened from a shortcut or email. But not it's not there unless I refresh the page. I've looked and haven't found a way to set this so that it works like it used to. I liked b
-
Authorization check failed Auth. Obj. M_MSEG_LGO Goods Movements
Hello security team. We are using two roles for one authorization object to be checked in the MIRO transaction. One role (1) checks the S_TCODE and the authorization object M_MSEG_LGO for ACTVT and BWART fields. The other role (2) checks for the sa
-
CI versus Non CI PDF documents
is there a way to determine a CI versus Non-CI format PDF document without having to open it first? Ie is this information in the file tag? If so how is it read or queried from the file system? Using Adobe Acrobat 6.0 standard