FCP Oddity - HD footage sometimes scale at 100% - sometimes 225%

I am having a final cut pro oddity happening.
Shooting from the same 2 cameras and capturing the footage exactly the same way and sometimes the footage in the sequence is appearing at 100% and sometimes it is appearing at 225% and therefore needs to be rendered.
There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to when it is 100% and when it is 225% even in the same sequence timeline. One camera will be at one scale and the other will be at the other.
Any ideas as to why this is happening?
The only adverse effect is high-speed motion that is scaled at 225% is outputting onto DVD with a slight choppy motion.
Thanks

I've had that happen - let me ask you a few questions.
1 - Is this a discrepancy between footage from the different cameras? OR, is it happening to footage from the same camera.
2 - are you noticing this the moment you drag(or insert) the footage on the timeline?
3 - can you tell me the properties of the capture footage from both cameras and the sequence settings.
(In my experience, this has happened when I dropped 1080 footage on a 720 timeline, and I didn't know that the 1080 footage had been shot at 1080 - or, I just forget which camera shot at which. - the 1080 footage will not self scale to 720 - it will be blown up)
Let me know what you come up with.
pJ

Similar Messages

  • Sequence = 896x504  / Footage = 1920x108 / Scale is always 100%  Why?

    Hi folks,
    I filmed a presenter at 1920x1080 hoping to have a lot of room to work with if i imported onto a 896x504 sequence.  However, when I import it comes in at 100%.  I need to scale the presenter but I'm afraid I will intoroduce pixals (by going above 100%).
    Q.  Can I scale larger in hopes that Premiere is smart enough to know that my footage is larger and get away with it?
    Thanks!!
    -N

    You the man!
    Thanks for the reply.  Perfect.
    -Norm

  • How to burn DVD-footage Sony FDR AX-100, using FCP 10.1:

    I just purchased Sony FDR AX-100 video camera, will be importing to Final Cut Pro 10.1 to edit. My intent is to film in highest quality (4K), edit, and then burn on to DVDs for family. They all have different devices to play back the video - PC, Mac, DVD player.   From reading some other posts about this issue, I get the impression that I can not burn a DVD (using a DVD-R disc) of 4K edited footage? i.e.: the only way to view back the video would be connecting my Mac Book Pro directly to a High Def tv via HDMI cord?  Thank you for any clarification you can provide!

    Thanks very much for your speedy reply!  What would be the best way for me to provide the highest quality video to the 'general' viewer (parents, friends, family)?  The original video footage is so incredibly sharp, clear, smooth, etc, and I want their viewing experience of it to be as good as can be... but unfortunately I have to keep in mind that they all have different devices by which they will view it (PC, Mac, HD TV with DVD player, etc).  There may not be a solution, but I'm hoping someone more knowledgeable than me can help!

  • Where can I learn how FCP references video footage?

    I'm sure this is a basic (but perhaps involved?) question.
    I've been learning and using FCP on and off for over a year. I've been using online tutorials and developing a basic knowledge of the program.
    I just bought a new 27" iMac with two internal hard drives (the 256GB solid state drive, and a 2TB regular drive). Up until now, I've only ever owned computers with one internal drive, and have never even gotten into editing footage on an external drive.
    I've installed FCS 2 on my new iMac, and now I need to transfer the projects I've worked on to my new iMac, along with the video footage those projects use. And I need to know what the best way to do this is. FCS is on the solid-state drive (of course). I'm sure I should put the footage I'm editing on the secondary 2TB internal drive. And maybe the project files, too? Or should they be on the solid-state drive?
    Anyway, I really don't have a good understanding of what should be where, and what I need to be transferring, and how to make sure that FCP "knows" where to look for the footage I'm editing.
    Is there a place in the manual, or a post here, or a FAQ, or somewhere where I can read about this and get a good understanding of it? This is something I need to know, anyway, so I will know how to backup and store projects that I might want to edit further in the future.
    If it matters, I'm editing footage shot in AVCHD on a Canon camcorder. To date, all I've done is backup the actual AVCHD files on multiple drives, reasoning that if I had a crash I could edit the footage all over again. But I want to learn the proper way to do all of this.
    Thanks!

    When you "uncompress" AVCHD files
    You aren't uncompressing. You are RE-COMPRESSING. AVCHD is compressed, and you can't uncompress that. But, you compress it into an editing codec...ProRes.
    would the result be exactly the same if you did it more than once?
    Not sure what you mean by that. There will be slight loss when you recompress, but nothing you'd notice. Transcoding, as it is called, is quite a normal process. ProRes is so well designed of a codec that you can recompress to ProRes again and again 10 times before you see any issues.
    if I logged and transferred using the same settings, would the footage be exactly the same?
    You can't. FCP doesn't work with AVCHD...it must be converted to ProRes.
    My understanding is that FCP "looks" for video footage where it "expects" it to be based on how and where you imported it.
    Yes. Once you set your Capture Scratch to your external drive, say MEDIA_01...FCP keeps looking for it there. If you move it, then FCP loses contact with it. Until you tell FCP where it is again.
    Let's say I had my project saved, but somehow lost my footage. If I logged and transferred it again from the same AVCHD files, would it come out exactly the same so that (if I put it on the right drive in the right folder) my FCP project would work with it as though it was the original logged and transferred footage?
    Yes....absolutely. The project file is the most important thing. Those clips in there point to the media. If the media drive dies, or the media is deleted, simply highlight all the clips and do a BATCH CAPTURE...FCP will look for the original SOURCE files, the AVCHD files, and then re-transcode them. And they will be exactly like the first time you imported them. And your cut will be rebuilt.
    Or would there be small differences that would result in my FCP project not recognizing it?
    Yes. If you move the footage, rename the footage on the FINDER level, meaning opening the drive and renaming the raw footage, or if you rename the folder that they are in, FCP will lose the connection. Which is why you DON'T do that. Designate the Capture Scratch...import the footage, and only deal with the footage in FCP...until you really know how things work and how to get FCP to reconnect to this footage.
    Shane

  • Request for raw ATCHD footage from HF-10/100 owners.

    My HF-10 will be here in a few days, and I like to get a minute or so of raw AVCHD footage to experiment with before it arrives. Anyone know where I can download a small sample from?

    Is it true that 1 GB of AVCHD = 5 GB of Apple ProRes?
    AVCHD is an H64 variant. All these cameras capture at varying quality levels and that determines the data rate of the captured footage. So "1GB of AVCHD" isn't useful in making any comparison without knowing what data rate that produced that 1 GB.
    Have you heard of any Apple development to support AVCHD natively?
    No, nor would this be the right place for speculation ... but for what its worth I truly dearly hope that Apple's FCP development team are NOT working on native AVCHD support. What a monumental waste of R&D time that would be for a professional app when there are so many professional aspects of the application that need urgent attention. I dare say you'll get your wish though, as Apple seem far more focused on supporting consumers rather than professionals these days with their Pro Apps. And to be fair, its not surprisingly so. By bringing the cost of their Pro Apps within reach of the average consumer then the line is forever blurred between the two, and hundreds of thousands of paying customers baying for support for consumer formats will surely outweigh the tens of thousands of pro's asking for further development of the core toolset. I dare say you will get your wish, mores the pity :/

  • How to change the Y-axis scale for 100% stacked column to percentage ?

    Hi,
    I add a 100% stacked column chart to a report in Crystal Report for Enterprise. As default, the Y-axis scale shows value from 0 to 1 and the data labels display absoluted data value. Now I want the Y-axis scale to show value from 0% to 100% and the data labels to display percentage value.
    Please tell me which option of the chart to adjust ?
    Thanks
    Mau Vu Huu
    The default is like screenshot below:
    I want it to display as screenshot below:
    thanks
    Mau Vu Huu

    Looks like a bug in CR for Enterprise.
    The same chart shows a scale from 0% to 100% in the CR 2011 designer whereas CR for Enterprise seems to show a number range from 0 to 1.
    Here's a workaround:
    1) Insert a Crosstab. 'Column' should be the field you wish to show on the 'X-axis'. 'Row' should be the field that you wish to stack up on the bars. Summary should be the measure field
    2) Next, right-click one of the summary cells on the Crosstab > Select Format Total > Total > Check 'Show as Percentage of' > Grand Total > Row
    3) Right-click the Crosstab > Select Create Chart from Crosstab Data
    4) Suppress the section that holds the Crosstab
    5) Right-click the chart > Edit Chart Type > Choose 'Stacked Column'
    6) Highlight one of the numbers of the Y-axis > Select Format Total (Y) axis > Format > Currency > Choose 'Fixed' under 'Symbol Format' > Replace '$' under Symbol to '%' > Change Symbol Position to '-123$'.
    -Abhilash

  • After "send to FCP" my HD footage are jittery but Pal is ok. Why?

    Hi i hope you all can help me.
    I edited is sequence with DVCPRO HD 1080i/50 mixed with Anamorphic PAL clips and all was fine. Every clip played back smoothly.
    I then graded the sequence in color/rendered and then sent back to FCP. Then all the HD clips plays back jittery. It look like a shift field problem but it is not. All the Pall clips are fine.
    I tried copying the color sequence to my original sequence but still the same problem.
    Thanks
    Andre

    I never mix formats, frame rates, frame sizes or codecs when I send to Color. Also, I don't work in PAL so I haven't kept on this problem but Color used to have some problems working w/PAL and w/working w/DVCPro HD that ran at 50hz. I don't know if the most current version of Color still has these problems, but the first thing I would do is make on timeline in FCP that's only PAL footage and another thats only DVCPro HD footage and Color them separately. Color is not good at handling interlaced footage so it might be getting hung up because the field order of those two formats isn't the same.
    -A

  • Using FCP HD digitized footage on old FCP version

    Hi there,
    I spent 2 days digitizing all my footage on Final Cut Pro HD. I saved it on my external hard drive. Now, I no longer have access to that system and have to use a friend's computer that only has an older version of FCP, pre-HD. Can I still edit my already-digitized footage on this? (The footage was shot on DV in the "false" anamorphic setting).
    Thanks,
    Aube

    ok now i feel better
    watch yourself Andy, the dark side is calling you ...
    x
    p.s. How much earlier are we talking about - v1, v2, v3 or v4?

  • How do you transfer FCP Studio Pro footage to FCP X

    I have a lot of footage ond my FCP STUDIO PRO and want ot upgrade to X.  How do I get the footage over to this new software?
    thanks

    If you mean your FCP 7 projects - you can use an application called 7toX to transfer them to FCP X.
    http://assistedediting.intelligentassistance.com/7toX/
    (It's available from the AppStore).
    Andy

  • FCP Setup for Footage shot HD, But Downconverting to Standard

    I have a G5 (no Intel chip) with a Sony Digital HD Videocassette Recorder that will downconvert to standard on input of footage into the computer. For edit purposes, should I be changing my FCP setup to HD or keep it as standard?
    Last time I did that (standard setting), it tripled the input time as the box could not keep up. Any tricks I should know about?

    What camera? Specific model type and type of media it records. Without that, we can't offer any substantial advice.
    G5s are getting long in the tooth. Laptops now run circles around them. It was good for a few formats of HD, but not all, and not the newer formats.
    Now, the question about keeping it HD or going SD is all up to you. What is the deliverable? What is the final product going to be? DVD? BluRay? HD tape? That dictates what your working conditions are.
    Shane

  • Can FCP upres DV footage?

    I am looking to enhance the 24p-DV footage I shot by upresing it. I'm trying to make the video look good enough for a larger screen or an HD TV.
    Is there a filter out there that can enhance the image somehow so that at a larger size it will look great?
    Or is there a way to export in a higher res?
    I know, it's DV and it can't bump up too much because it distorts. But what about the filters, man...

    DV is DV, and cannot be improved upon. It is compressed 5:1 in the camera onto tape. Dropping it into a 10-bit uncompressed sequence will not make it look any better. The only reason people do that is to make the graphics or titles used with DV to look better.
    In fact, dropping DV into an uncompressed timeline and rendering will add compression and make it look worse.
    Shane
    "There's no need to fear, UNDERDOG is here!"

  • Returned from a 2 week vacation and emails were printing at 40%, changed scale to 100% now header and 1st part of email are not printing.

    This seems to be happening on emails I send or ones I get from my friends, all "commercial" emails seem to be OK. I tried changing the margins but that did not work. All other print functions, from Word or Excel are working fine, it's only Thunderbird email. If it is a short one or two line email, the printer spits out a blank page.
    Vinnie

    So long as your movies are in a compatble format and in the video app they will play just fine.
    Other apps will work, some might require mirroring, which is why it's best to use the in supplied video app.
    Video formats
    H.264 video up to 720p, 30 frames per second, Main Profile level 3.1 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps per channel, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats
    MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats
    Motion JPEG (M-JPEG) up to 35 Mbps, 1280 by 720 pixels, 30 frames per second, audio in ulaw, PCM stereo audio in .avi file format
    Audio formats supported
    HE-AAC (V1), AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), protected AAC (from iTunes Store), MP3 (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Audible (formats 2, 3, and 4), Apple Lossless, AIFF, and WAV; Dolby Digital 5.1 surround sound pass-through

  • Still Images & Need to 'Scale to Sequence'-Vertical vs. Horizontal Picture

    I make sequences from still images only. I need to start editing with all images at a Scale (in the Basic Motion section) of 100. When the original image is 720 width x 540 height (a picture taken horizontally), it appears in the timeline at a Basic Motion:Scale of 100 (this is what I want). However, when the original image is 405 width x 540 height (a picture taken vertically), it appears in the timeline at a Basic Motion:Scale of 112.5 and overflows the top and bottom of screen.
    For these vertical images, I can then set the Scale manually, or use "Scale to Sequence" and get it to start at 100, but would like to avoid that extra step. Any ideas on how to have all imported images start at a Basic Motion:Scale of 100, whether taken vertically or horizontally?
    Thanks, in advance, for giving this problem any thoughts.

    I think that your best bet would be to
    1) make the images all the same size - adding black to the edges if necessary. You could add an alpha channel on the ones that you had to add black to the edges.
    or
    2) copy the motion settings from a still that is scaled correctly.
    or
    3) grin and bear it.
    I created a file earlier this morning that FCP didn't scale, but now I can't duplicate it. All the files are getting scaled. According to the manual, FCP isn't supposed to scale past 100%, but they might have changed that with a revised version.
    Good luck!
    Leigh

  • Must still images reside in iPhoto to use in FCP X?

    Delete, sorry.
    Message was edited by: rwbjr

    I think that your best bet would be to
    1) make the images all the same size - adding black to the edges if necessary. You could add an alpha channel on the ones that you had to add black to the edges.
    or
    2) copy the motion settings from a still that is scaled correctly.
    or
    3) grin and bear it.
    I created a file earlier this morning that FCP didn't scale, but now I can't duplicate it. All the files are getting scaled. According to the manual, FCP isn't supposed to scale past 100%, but they might have changed that with a revised version.
    Good luck!
    Leigh

  • FCP-DVDSP sequence PAL footage transcoding

    hello,
    I write asking of help in order to
    (a) make a proper transcoding workflow and sequence to edit MPG footage with FCP
    (b) output and convert for DVDSP.
    I dont know FCP compression and settings so well, and i think i made some mistakes...
    I use mac 10.5.8 Leopard on POWERpc with FCPStudio 7 (in the past i was using FCS5).
    I need to shrink 2 videos 50min duration each (100min total), in order to fit on DVDSP.
    I get a disc meter error my footage is 5.8 GB and exceeded space limit.
    this is the 2/2 DVD (1rst is burned ok- it is alsmost full).
    My files m2v are about 1.6GB each and inside DVDSP seem that
    occupy 2.5GB each (rendered ?)ps for SD.
    I recently received some mpg files from a sony hdd camcorder Dsr Sr58.
    It has split scenes saved as MPG files which i transcoded to various formats
    and tried to import them in a prores444 sequence in FCP to edit.
    footage is handheld and has shaky parts too for most of the time.
    this does not seem to be an HD camcorder, and i assume, despite the fact
    it has a 1:9 LCD records 4:3 and 16:9 anamorphic. I have attached an image
    of the folder names i get when i plug the camera via usb on my mac.
    I cannot also understand, what is the frame rate recorded by this camera.
    i believe it is INTERLACED 25fps. I see evident lines on my mac @ playback.
    I need to burn PAL SD DVD (50fps) at the end.
    When i open a file in MPEG streamclip, shows 1024x576 frame size unscaled.
    However, when i open it in QT shows 720x404.
    I firstly used MPEG streamclip and exported to QT making 2 versions
    (a) Photo JPG compressor codec @ 80 quality
    (b) Prores444 @ 70 Quality.
    I did not Deinterlaced in the transcoding stage at all.
    I then opened (a) in FCP and i saw i needed to render all clips inc audio
    I exported to mov but files are huge and when i make m2v files are 2GB each.
    i tried (b) and saw i needed to render the clips again. The m2v files are about 2.2GB each
    and there is NO way to bring the quality slider down in FC sequence settings. Seems locked to 100%.
    So... I abandoned temporarily and ask for any help here.
    Can anyone suggest me a procedure, on
    (a) Make a proper project sequence that wont need
    render the files each time i import them from transcoding
    (b) Suggest how to use compressor and the variable bit rate setting to decrease size further ?
    thanks

    hm... thanks for sugesting JES. it seems when i feed this movie file in JES and choose deinterlace, the program crashes when file gets about 100%.
    yesterday i tried to burn the interlaced footage on DVDsp deleting clip1 to be able to burn it.
    I made the m2v file using compressor and set BIT RATE to 3,7mbps average. max rate=6.4mbps
    Motion estimation= good, and mode= one pass vbr best. i imported them in DVDSP...
    burn was ok. i played the dvd on 2 different dvd players (no pc/mac), on PAL TV.
    the first played image ok. i mean stady shots appeared clean with tiny interlaced lines sometimes.
    The shots that had camera shake and fast PAN (amateur video) showed flickering on TV and during pan
    they were leaving a semi-transparent trail behind peope. like a ghost shadow.
    The second one, played a more smooth version of steady images without showing the interlaced lines. however, same shadows appeared when fast pan occured, with slow prosumer camera speeds i believe.
    JES does not work for a reason on PPC DC 2ghz or i make wrong settings....
    I tried deinterlacing (progressive) with MPEGstreamclip, and worked ok. the
    Now, my question is.... if i make m2v files again, same bit rate, burn in DVDSP, will the dvd player, play them ok on PAL tv (which uses interlaced lines to display the image) ?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Windows and VMware fusion

    How do I uninstall Windows 7 on my MacBook? I also want to uninstall my VMware fusion. If I uninstall VMware Fusiun, will Windows 7 also be uninstalled automaticly?

  • Exclude a VM from discovery

    Hi All, can I exclude a VM from the discovery? If yes. How?

  • Home sharing not working after iTunes 11 update

    Hi everyone, after updating to iTunes 11 on our Macs OS X 10.6.8 and OS X 10.8.2 our home sharing doesn't work anymore. We have tried to turn home sharing off and set it up again several times, but no shared devices or accounts appear in the library

  • Advantage of Oracle Database Firewall

    Hi I am newbie to Database Firewall. One of our client is already using SecureSphere Database Firewall. Now we are proposing Oracle Database firewall to the client so that we need to know the advantage of oracle database firewall compared to securesp

  • XGrid and Final Cut Pro

    hey peeps, I was wondering if Final Cut Pro would benifit from xgrid. We have 4 Mac Pros for the video guys and they would find it useful if they could share resources, especially if one individual is not using there machine to its full potential. If