FI-AA and FI-GL Reconciliation

When I run ABST2, i get error that with W004, and also 999 and some without these.
Though I checked asset balance for a particular asset class and the same g/l, they have the same balance, but this is on the list with W004. I think W004 is a warning but how about 999 .
Is it necessary to run ABST2 before closing asset fiscal year and opening new one. Also is ABST2 needed to forward balances to next fiscal year. What if we don't run it.

Hi,
I had the same issue in the project recently. Followings are what my summary:
1. ABST2 is used to reconcilie Asset sub-ledger and GL Balance, It matchs the balance from two
    angles - last year end (blank in Period column) and Current Year (999 in Period column).
2. If the balance of Asset subledger and GL is perfectly matched, the record will not be shown in the
    ABST2 list.
3. If only the total balance is matched, but the balance of last year end and current year are
    unmatched, then W004 is shown in Doc. no. column,
4. It's OK to set the reconciliation type in via OAMK if W004 is in there.
Hope this is helpful !
Joe    

Similar Messages

  • Questions on AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation?

    Dear all,
    I know the purpose of "The AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report" provides a transactional breakdown of each accrual account with a net balance not equal to zero in a summarized or full transaction details version.
    However, I found out that on of the Purchase Order has been done the PO receipt and created an invoice in AP (validate and accounted). But the report still showing PO is 0 and AP is 343,000 in AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation report. I am just wondering what I have done wrong suppose the PO and AP should be equal in that case.
    Please advice.
    Thanks.

    Is there any miscellaneous transactions recorded in error to your accrual accounts,These miscellaneous transactions or transactions unrelated to purchase order receipts may be from Payables.

  • Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report?

    Dear all,
    We are using R12.1.3 and doing the reconciliation AP Vs PO Accrual. However, I run the report "Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report" and found that one record is strange, like the PO Accrual balance is something -10,000 and the Account Payable balanced is 0.00.
    What does it mean for my case? Please advice.
    Thanks in advance.

    Dear all,
    I rerun " Accrual Reconciliation Load Run" program with data range. After that I re-run "Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report" and found that everything is fine now.
    I just wondering am I need to run "Accrual Reconciliation Load Run" every month end closing or just run once for up-grade POs?
    Please advice.
    Thanks.

  • R12: How to filter AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report based on GL Date

    Hi,
    Anybody know how to filter AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report based on GL Date from and GL Date to in R12?
    Since we just upgraded from 11.5.10 to 12.1.3 and found we cannot filter those report for specific date. It shown all data included the old data from 8 years ago also.
    We need to run the report only for specific date only. Please share with me if anyone know about this.
    Thanks.

    In 12 you can rebuild and run the report for a particular period, but not a single day if that's what's required

  • BP (is Vendor and also Customer) reconciliation

    Hi Experts,
    I am an user of SAP B1. I tried the internal reconciliation for BP who is both Customer and Vendor. The function is working. But the multicurrency has problem.
    Here is the detail of my testing: trade in USD, local currency is CAD, System currency is USD.
    AR in#101195 amount $600.00USD(FC), $757.08CAD(LC), Ex Rate:1.2618
    Two AP transactions: In#102865 is $594.00USD(FC), $653.40CAD(LC), Ex Rate:1.1,  In#102863 is $495.00USD(FC), $624.59CAD(LC), Ex Rate:1.2618
    The reconciliation like below on April 7, 2009, Ex Rate:1.2
    Origin     Origin No.     G/L Acct/BP Code     Ref. 1     Due Date     Amount     Applied Amount
    PU     102865     VTest      102865        4/3/2009            CAD (653.40)      CAD (653.40)
    IN     101195     CTest     101195     4/6/2009            CAD  757.08     CAD  757.08
    PU     102863     VTest     102863     4/6/2009            CAD (624.59)     CAD (103.68)
    From USD amount AR in#101195 $600.00USD, reconciled AP in#102865 $594.00USD. There is only $6USD difference. But after reconciliation system took $82.17(103.68/1.2618, reconciled amount/AP In#102863 ex rate) out of AP In#102863. This is only for $600USD reconciliation.
    The total reconciled FC is $682.17USD. Total reconciled SC is $630.90USD(757.08/1.2). The Should Be amount is $600.00USD.
    Could you please help to find a solution?

    Hi Ben,
    If this BP only works in USD create it as USD instead of Multi Currency BP.
    It is also possible to do manual JE in FC only, however, I would advice against this way of working for different reasons. 1 is that if you run exchange rate differences the system will suggest a correction for those entries, another is that in the end, if you use more than 1 currency, meaning not only USD, the foreign currency column will not have any meaning. It will not add 10 Euros + 10 USD + 10 Mexican Pesos. (1 apple + 1 banana <> 2 pineapples)
    Alternatively if you use Local Currency and USD there will be postings in LC only and the total of the foreign currency column will not match up to the LC.
    I hope it all makes sense.
    Jesper

  • BI FI and Cost Centre Reconciliation

    Hi
    I have a requriement to create a GL reconciliation report between Finance and Cost centre data, i have a multi sitting over the relevant cubes and the data is coming through.
    The report is as follows
                     |_FI Total__|___Cost Centre Total__|__Difference_(should = 0)
    GL Account |                  |                                  |                   
    For the cost centre data the report should bring through the data where the cost element = GL account in the row,
    ie GL Account - 60000
    FI Total - GL Account - 60000
    CC Total - Cost Element - 60000
    Difference - FI - CC
    Any ideas on how i can do this or if this is possible?
    Thanks
    Josh

    Hi Harshal
    Yes i was able to create this report, i had to create an infoobject ZFI_GLCE with 0GL_ACCOUNT as a ref. characteristic.
    Then i created a cube and had transformation going from YCOOM_C02 (CO-OM: Costs and Allocations (Delta Extraction)) to the cube where i mapped the Cost Element to ZFI_GLCE and then also had another transformation from YFIGLO02 (General Ledger: Line Items) to the cube mapping the GL Account to ZFI_GLCE.
    Could you further explain the problem you are having with the GL Accounts?
    Josh

  • Report against BW and ECC for reconciliation

    Hello Everyone,
    I would need some advice on crystal report design for a requirement where I have to use an existing query on BW to build a crystal report and then create a report on top of table in ECC and then do a reconciliation between these two data sets.
    So, Once I create the crystal reports individually for each of the systems is there a way to create a third report which would allow me to do a difference between the values from two reports previously generated to do the reconciliation.
    Please let me know.
    Thanks
    Dharma.

    Hello,
    Thanks for replying back to the question. I apologize for the questions (am new to crystal reports, so am trying to get my hands around it for reconciliation report)
    I created two crystal reports
    1. Report on top of BW
          Fields:
             A. Company Code
             B. Vendor
             C. Local Currency
             D. Total Amount
    2. Report on top of ECC
         Fields:
            A. Company Code
            B. Vendor
            C. Local Currency
            D. Total Amount (This is a formula, as I used the total amount and debit/credit indicator to get the negative sign for amount)
    Once I have created these two reports,
    The first question is,
                In the second report for the combination of the three characteristics mentioned above I have multiple rows, how can I aggregate them similar to BW where I have one row for a given combination.
    The second question is,
                I created a third report and I used the option you mentioned earlier "Insert --> Sub-report". When I used this option I selected the first report on top of BW and inserted it into Data Field and then used the same option to insert the second report on top of ECC and inserted it in Data field below the first report.
    Once I had these reports inserted, I created formula fields in the third report for the following fields
    1. Company Code
    2. Vendor
    3. Local Currency
    4. Total Amount
    From here on, I am not sure how can I link the fields from the above reports to the third report and also how can I do reconciliation between these two reports.
    I really appreciate your help in this regards.
    Thanks
    Dharma.

  • Fixed Asset and G/L reconciliation

    Dear All
    Can anyone help me with how best to reconcile the fixed asset module with the General Ledger. Is there a guideline or process on what reports are best used and how to do this.
    Many Thanks
    PRG

    Hi,
    The reconciliation reports (via SE38) are:
    RAABST02 - totals
    RAABST01 - per asset class (reconciliation account)/asset
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Over Time Approval process and Time Balance Reconciliation at Termination P

    Hi Friends,
    I would like to know generic Overtime approval process in Time management & also the process for Time balance Reconciliation at termination.
    These both process are in my project scope.I have to draw a flowchart two both of the above process to my client.
    Can any one of you help me out,with process flow charts are you give me a scenarion,wher i can draw a flowchart also appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Lasya

    Hi,
    For overtime approval process... either u can use IT 2005. or You can use IT 2007 for overtime quota and 2002 for Approval process. Its also mentioned in one of the SAP HR Book HR311. You can refer that book, Its in detail and really going to help you..
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • Comparing CO and FI totals (Reconciliation)

    Hello!
    I need to find a way how to compare CO and FI totals for every cost element /  account. Actually, totals for account may be taken from FS10N, but getting totals for cost elements is still very long process.
    The only way I found is using report S_ALR_87013603 CO/FI Reconciliation, but I have some troubles with it. First, I can see data just for CO-module; FI column is empty. Second, when the table is formed, what does double-clicking on a line do? I suppose it allows seeing the detailed description for every cost element, but it still shows nothing after 2 hours after I double-clicked on it.
    So, these are my questions:
    1. Is there any other way of comparing totals of CO and FI other than running S_ALR_87013603 ?
    2. If this report is the only way, how can I see data for FI module if it's empty in the report?
    3. Is it possible to get a detailed description of costs for every cost element in this report by double-clicking on it?
    Thanks everyone in advance!
    Alexander.

    Hello Alex
    There are two reports  are available KE5Z and 2KEE, if u want compare the line item wise you can utilise the KE5Z or otherwise only summary for each cost element or account go for 2KEE
    With the above two reports only we are comparing the FI with CO with profit center wise etc.,
    Regards
    Madhav

  • MIRO and change Alternative Reconciliation Account

    Hi Experts:
    I'm trying to change the account on MIRO Tx. wich a Alternative Reconciliation account. I was testing LMR1M001 User Exit but It didn't work.
    Do you know any way that it can work?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi ,
    Check this tcode - OBF4 or try with OLMRLIST . In OLMRLIST  you have to define screen variants there u try enabling the GL field .
    Check this out . Though I haven't check this ....
    Update us if it helps .
    Thanks
    Dipak

  • FI-AA and F-GL reconciliation Error

    Hi Asset Gurus,
    Loaded all the Assets using AS91.
    Did the manual entry to GL using OASV.
    When i run the ABST2 Report , iam getting the below error message.
    "Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
    Message no. MQ555"
    "Differences between assets and G/L accts at the key date Message no. MQ557"
    When i checked with GL balance FAGLB03 and Asset Balance report the values match but for some reason getting this error and
    Client  want to see the 0.00 in Difference coloumn in ABST2.
    Appriciate your inputs.
    Thanks,
    Heera.

    Hi Heera,
    please see below blog (point 8):
    /people/javier.reviriego/blog/2008/07/09/year-end-closing-in-asset-accounting-best-practices
    Regards Bernhard

  • CATSDB  and Payroll Hours Reconciliation

    Hello,
    The problem is this: Given a date range from the selection screen, get the hours worked (catshours) from CATSDB and then match it up from the payroll hours (ANZHL) from RT to see if there is any discrepancy.
    To solve this problem, I am reading the RGDIR and looping where PAYDT is between pn-begda and pn-endda and strza eq 'A' (active) and void ne 'V'. Then getting the sequence numbers in an internal table and calling the RT table for all the sequence numbers. Finally adding the ANZHL based on LGART.
    From CATSDB side, select catshours where pernr eq pernr-pernr, workdate between pn-begda and pn-endda, status eq (from select options), awart eq (from select options) into an itab. Then adding up  the catshours in the itab.
    The problem is the data is not matching up..is it because the dates (pn-begda pn-endda  and payroll periods are not matching up?) what is wrong?
    I will reward points immediately..
    Thanks

    Thanks Manu...I appreciate it.   Actually I realized that I was counting the hours multiple times for the same For Period because of the Off-Cycle Payments/Additional Payments etc.  I will use "PAYTY EQ ' '" to exlclude the additional runs/off cycles etc. Lets see if it works..

  • R/3(DB tables) and BW cube reconciliation

    1)  SOURCE
    3 tables are there GLPCA , BSEG , BKPF .We are getting company code , GL , Local Currency and Group Currency from these tables .
    TARGET
    BW cube (Profit center cube)
    Can please somebody suggest how to reconcile the datas between the SOURCE and TARGET.
    Thanks
    Suraj

    Hi haritha
    I need to compare the following characteristics :
    company code
    gl Account
    Local currency
    group currency
    with the key figure values(Between the remote cube and the basic cube ).
    I have created the 2 restricted key figure (which stores the respective values
    from different infoproviders) ..and finally i have made a calculated key figure which
    does the difference of the 2 restricted key figures i have created ...
    Now if the value of the calculted key figure is 0 then fine if not then show the exeption (how do i implement this OR what should i put in the "from" and "to" fields in the exception for the calculted key figure)..
    Thanks
    Suraj

  • LDAPSYNC Reconn Job: LDAP User Create and Update Reconciliation

    OIM 11.1.1.5.4 (BP4) libOVD, trusted data source oid 11.1.1.5.0
    I have the reconn job working " LDAP User Create and Update FULL Reconciliation"
    But the incremental job not working "LDAP User Create and Update Reconciliation"
    No errors found in the oim server logs
    the msg found with the indication of the execution of the job.
    Has anyone been successful with the job "LDAP User Create and Update Reconciliation"
    [2012-10-21T08:09:03.922-04:00] [oim_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [IAM-1020005] [oracle.iam.scheduler.impl.quartz] [tid: OIMQuartzScheduler_Worker-2] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 0000Je3Cacy3n3WjLxuHOA1GWyFa000002,0] [APP: oim#11.1.1.3.0] Job Listener, Job was executed QuartzJobListener.jobWasExecuted Description null FullName DEFAULT.LDAP User Create and Update Reconciliation Name LDAP User Create and Update Reconciliation
    TIA
    gadba

    has any one had that worked, for the incremental job of ldapsync recon ?

Maybe you are looking for