FI - MM impact

I am FI consultant,
I created new tax code , a new account key created for  the condition type ZXXX for indentifying in separate GL account
As far as FI-MM is concerned the new condition type ZXXX would be added to the ZTAXINN procedure.
What effect on MM? how to check? where to check? in MM module..
please guide.

hi,
if it is tax code there wll not be any impact on FI-MM
you hve to assign GL account in OB40.
Best Regards
Ashish Jain

Similar Messages

  • Impact if FIGL10 DSO is not staged b4 FIGL10 Cube

    Heallo SDNer's,
    How wud it impact if I dont stage 0FIGL_O10 - DSO between 0FIGL_C10 ?
    Structures wud be similar - no additional fields in Cube.
    Even SAP defined DSO n Cube have similar fields.
    Datasource is <b>delta capable</b> - 0FI_GL_10.
    Some background - > After having enhanced FIGL10 DSO with some fields which do exist in the datasource I have to have 19Keys to determine the unique records or to pull all records from PSA w/o any records being overwritten.
    However, datasource relevant OSS note sugggested to take d help of artificial keys ( for the same DSO...here 1 artificial key will concatinate 4 keys  ) .
    <b>Data volumes will be less - 200thousands a month.</b>
    Wud SAP suggested method ( artificial keys ) be a better bet ?
    Please share your thoughts.....any inputs wud really help

    Jr Roberto,
    You can do this. In BW system.
    1. Go to table RSOLTPSOURCE.
    2. Enter 0FI_GL_10 as datasource.
    3. Check the field delta process value, refer that value to table RODELTAM.
    That will tell you what kind of data is coming from that extractor. Based on the delta data (After image, before image and after image, etc), you can decide whether you need  DSO or not.
    -Saket

  • Impact of Addition of New Value Fields in the existing Op. Concern-COPA

    Hi All,
    Want to know the steps of adding new value fields in the existing operating concern in COPA?
    What is the overall impact of addition of New Value fields in the running Operating Concern?
    How do we test the addition of new value fields?
    Is the addition of New Value fields to the running Operating Concern advisable?
    Your support and advice is highly anticipated and appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards
    9819528669
    Ohter details are as follows...
    VALUE FIELDS : Defines the Structure of your Costs & Revenues. (Op. Concern 120 Value Fields) 
    1)     The client requires three new value fields to be created. Value fields for :
    -     Other Airport Charges - International
    -     Cargo Commission Cost
    -     Personal Cost (Direct)
    2)     What are the Steps involved in creation of new value fields? The steps are :
    1)     Before creating new value field we need to check whether we can use already existing UNUSED value fields (There are 62 value fields created for the op concern 1000, in production the value fields TBUL1-L7 i.e. to be used (I assume) screen shot1 provided. My predecessor has used value field VV291, VV292, VV380 original description being TBUL3, TBUL4, and TBUL1. I believe he has changed the description in development client and created a transport request ref screen shot 2)
    2)     You can create new value field thru T-Code KEA6 (4-5 characters beginning with VV) u2013 My predecessor has reused the value fields originally created he has not created new one I believe. please provide give your comments)
    3)     Specify whether this field is for Currency or Quantity (currency defined in attribute of op concern and quantity defined by its own field u2013 unit of measure) u2013 My predecessor has configured the three value fields as Currency.
    4)     Describe how the values in this field are aggregated over characteristics. (SUM, LAS, AVG) u2013 My predecessor has aggregated all the three value fields as SUM and they are in Active status.
    5)     After the value field is created you have to add the value field (active status only) to the operating concern by Editing the Data Structure. (I guess this is done in the next step)
    6)     Assign newly created Value fields to the Operating Concern u2013 T-Code KEA0 (In development client the value fields are assigned to the op concern 1000 refer screen shot 3. In the production client also those three value fields exist (does it mean they are assigned? your comments please.) As they have the original description TBUL3, TBUL4, and TBUL1 refer screen shot 4.
    7)     After the Data Structure is defined you need to activate them. (creates plan vs actual database) u2013 Go to the data structure tab and Choose Activate. The status in dev client is Active with correct description but in the production client it is Active with the OLD description. After addition of the value field you need to regenerate the operating concern. T-Code KEA0 u2013 right?
    8)     Condition Types are assigned to Value Fields? Donu2019t know u2013 T-Code KE45 (I think this is NOT required in our case u2013 Please give your comments)
    9)     Define and Assign Valuation Strategy u2013 Cost assigned to Value fields u2013 T-Code KE4U (I think this is also NOT required in our case)
    10)     Define PA Transfer Structure for Settlement u2013 T-Code KEI1 (This step is crucial u2013 I think I have to to include newly created value fields, but am not aware how to do it and what is the connectivity or what happens after this is done)
    Note: My predecessor has created a Transport Request No# KEDK902167 for the value fields created by him.
    3)     Whether my predecessor has performed all the steps for value field creation? How to test it and check that?
    4)     If yes then,  Do I need to perform additional configuration or can I proceed to transport it to Production?
    5)     What is COPA Allocation Structure & PA Transfer Structure? Where and Why It is used?
    6)     What are the different methods of cost and revenue allocations in SAP?
    7)     I have checked the status of the value fields across clients, It is as followsu2026
         Value Field     Value Field For     Description     Development      Quality     Production
    1     VV291     Other Airport Charges International     TBUL3     Exists      DNE     DNE
    2     VV292     Cargo Commission Cost     TBUL4     Exists      DNE     DNE
    3     VV380     Personal Cost u2013 Direct     TBUL1     Exists      DNE     DNE
    #DNE : Does Not Exist (assumed since the description given to value field is not the same as in development client.)

    HI sree,
    ofter creation value field and saving that time reqwest number appeare copy the reqwest number and go through the se01 select that reqwest number select and transport click the truck symbole, and draft a mail to basis guyw.
    Thank You!
    Best Regards,
    pradheep.

  • Help needed in index creation and its impact on insertion of records

    Hi All,
    I have a situation like this, and the process involves 4 tables.
    Among the 4 tables, 2 tables have around 30 columns each, and the other 2 has 15 columns each.
    This process contains validation and insert procedure.
    I have already created some 8 index for one table, and an average of around 3 index on other tables.
    Now the situation is like, i have a select statement in validation procedure, which involves select statement based on all the 4 tables.
    When i try to run that select statement, it takes around 30 secs, and when checked for plan, it takes around 21k memory.
    Now, i am in a situation to create new index for all the table for the purpose of this select statement.
    The no.of times this select statement executes, is like, for around 1000 times of insert into table, 200 times this select statement gets executed, and the record count of these tables would be around one crore.
    Will the no.of index created in a table impacts insert statement performace, or can we create as many index as we want in a table ? Which is the best practise ?
    Please guide me in this !!!
    Regards,
    Shivakumar A

    Hi,
    index creation will most definitely impact your DML performance because when inserting into the table you'll have to update index entries as well. Typically it's a small overhead that is acceptable in most situations, but the only way to say definitively whether or not it is acceptable to you is by testing. Set up some tests, measure performance of some typical selects, updates and inserts with and without an index, and you will have some data to base your decision on.
    Best regards,
    Nikolay

  • Photoshop CS2 trial to full lic - impact on LR

    Hi,
    Here are what I have installed in this order:
    - Expired trial Photoshop CS2
    - Lightroom (CS2 already expired when I install LR)
    I am going to reinstall a full license Photostop CS2 soon, would this have an impact on my existing LR?
    1. Do I need to reinstall LR so that LR can use (or rather can 'see')
    2. Photoshop CS2 to open individual files?
    3. Would changes on the RAW images done by LR are reflected in CS2?
    4. I like LR's Library layout, do I really need to install Adobe Bridge?
    5. If I use CS2 top open files direct from LR (bypassing Bridge), what colour management is best for both worlds? ProColor RGB?
    I use a Mac by the way.
    Thanks.
    Thomas

    1. No, LR is not affected by CS2 licencing procedures. LR not even uses activiation like CS2 which is very much appreciated.
    2,3 You have to ensure that you use the latest Camera Raw plugin for CS2 (ACR 3.7). If you activate the automatic update of XMP metadata you will be able to see changes you made in LR in Bridge and CS2.
    4. You do not have to. But if you are using CS2 heavily besides LR I personally would recommend Bridge
    5. It makes absolutely no difference if you open a file directly in CS2 or via Bridge concerning color management. ProPhoto RGB is very well suited to deal with 16Bit raw photos and it is the internally used color space of LR. But please note that there is no best choice. It really depends on your workflow and output.

  • Can't  view Impact and Lineage tab in Meta data report

    Post Author: mohideen_km
    CA Forum: Data Integration
    Hi guys,
    I have a problem in meta Data Report ..
    IN Impact and Lineage Analysis
    I can View only OVerview Tab.I can not view Impact and Lineage
    Help me to figure out..
    Mohideen

    Hi,
    Select text column (varchar column) -> Treat Text as -> custom text format ->Remove @ (default) -> add [html]<script>sometext(‘@’)</script> followed by your javascript
    for eg:
    [html]<script>buildGoogleChart(‘@’)</script> <head> <script type="text/javascript"> function show_alert() { alert("Hello! I am an alert box!"); } </script> </head> <body> <input type="button" onclick="show_alert()" value="Show alert box" /> </body> </html>
    hope helps u.........
    cheers,
    Aravind

  • Data Federator data lineage and impact analysis

    Hi,
    I am looking for the use of data lineage and impact analysis feature in data federator at Universe level.
    Can I know which objects are using which fields by uisng impact feature in the data federator.
    Thanks in Advance.

    I realize this answer is a cop out but I'll suggest it anyway. Upgrade.
    I struggled with getting the lineage and impact analysis working in 10.1 and had to do quite a bit of trial and error in the Apache configuration files, DAD's ,etc. because the lineage reports were web based. I never got them working in Production due to other much more pressing implementation issues at the time and never went back to fix them.
    In 10.2 and above the reports are much easier to get with no real configuration needed.
    Anyway, back to your question, I would suggest going back through the 10.1 documentation on getting those to work and have someone a bit familiar with setting up Apache help you. I did get them working in our Test environment but its been so long I can't recall all the steps and tricks, sorry.
    -gary

  • Upgrade R/3 (4.6C ECC 6.0): Impact BW (3.5)

    Hello experts,
    Within a short time our client will upgrade R/3 from 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
    BW will <u>not</u> be upgraded! Current version of BW is 3.5.
    I have to analyse which problems could occur after R/3 has been upgraded.
    I already found the notes:
    - 328181 Changes to extract structures in Customizing Cockpit
    - 505700 LBWE: New update methods as of PI 2002.1
    - 380078 FAQ: BW delta queue (RSA7): Questions and answers
    - 700779 Upgrading SAP ECC 500/600 with PI/PI-A/SSL_PI
    There are some questions which remain unanswered after reading the notes:
    1.     Plugin (software component PI – 2004_1_46C)
    Note 700779:
    “Software component PI no longer exists on ECC 600. The PI functions are completely integrated into the ECC 600 main components SAP_APPL 600 and SAP_HR 600.”
    Does this influence the software components in BW?
    Do the software components in BW need upgrading because of the integration of PI in ECC 600 to SAP_APPL and SAP_HR?
    Is there any documentation which clarifies this?
    2.     ALE Remote Connection
    I have read Re: R/3  Upgrade , which suggests that when you not change the logical names, IDOC types definitions, EDI partner profiles etc. then it should not be a problem to connect BW to R/3 after the upgrade.
    Is there any official documentation which can verify the above statement, or documentation which gives more information about the ALE remote connection??
    3.     LIS delta queue
    According to note 505700 I need to change the update mode ‘Serialized V3 update’ to e.g. ‘queued delta’ before we are going to upgrade.
    When we are going to upgrade, all delta queues should be emptied (transaction RSA7 and SMQ1). Are there any ‘how to guides’ for emptying delta queus??
    All help will be greatly appreciated!

    G,
    I went through an upgrade like this so what I can tell you is based on personal practical experience.
    1. BW was not affected because of this integration. Unless you need or want to any new functionality related to it, you don't need to do anything in the BW side.
    2. As you read in the link, as far as you don't change any of those settings, you're good to go.
    3. Emptying the Delta queue means stoping the update jobs (V3, for example) and executing the Deltas in BW until there are 0 records on them. Normally it takes a couple of loads in BW to make them "0" in R/3.
    The update mode doesn't affect the Delta Queues or the extraction to BW. It's just the way new or changes records are allocated in the queues. Only a change in the structure of your Datasource would impact your Delta queue and extractions.
    As I said, we went through this process and it was very smooth, no surprises or impacts in BW.
    Good luck!
    Regards,
    Luis

  • Shortened Fiscal Year and its impact on BI back end and Bex reports

    Hi All,
    Our client is making some changes to the fiscal year period.
    Becuase of some business requirements, we will have to shortened the fiscal year.
    Can you please suggest - what are the watch points when we do this?
                                            - what will be the impact to BI back end and Bex reports?
    Thanks,
    Nisha

    Hello Nisha,
    Since the fiscal year (Infobjects - 0FISCYEAR and/ 0FISCPER3) is compounded with fiscal year variant, therefore maintaining the correct variant in BI will automatically take care of showing the data correctly.
    So there are two things to be maintained in BI:
    1) To see that the variant definition.
    2) If you need to display the text of the fiscal periods, then the correct texts.
    Let me know if you need more clarifications.
    Regards,
    Shweta
    Edited by: Shweta Kesarwani on Jan 8, 2010 11:10 AM

  • Impact of Delta Records on Key Figure Summation in DSO

    Hi experts,
    I have a key figure with aggregation type "summation" in a DSO. I would like to know the impact of delta records on the key figure.
    E.g.
    source DSO
    doc_id (key) | doc_pos | type | amount
    4711 | 1 | A | 100 USD
    4711 | 2 | B | 20 USD
    target DSO
    doc_id (key) | amount
    4711 | 120 USD
    If the first record is modified ("type" from A to C) as follows and delta-loaded to target DSO:
    4711 | 1 | C | 100 USD
    This will lead to incorrect amount:
    target DSO
    doc_id (key) | amount
    4711 | 220 USD
    How can I handle this situation?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Meng

    Hi..
    I believe one document number and document Item will have only one type.
    Like 4711      1    should have only one type ( A / B / C).
    If the above assumption is true then just remove Doc Type from Key field of source DSO.
    Then From Source to Target Change Log table can handle this.
    Regards
    Anindya

  • Impact of mid month go-live

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell the impact of mid-month go-live?
    What extra precuations are required to be taken? Manual data entry, matching of balances etc.
    thx

    Hi Rohan,
    I think you need to first check the tables manually and make sure the tables are updated with the data.
    You can Use BAPI_EXTPAYROLL_INSERT_LEGACY to upload data to T558b and T558d tables.
    Then run the payroll driver PC00_MAE_CALC for UAE and use the special schema XLK0.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Mohsin.

  • FI-AA Impact on changing the year dependent fiscal year period from 445 to 435

    Dear Friends,
    May I have your comment on the impact of below change
    Currently using Year Dependent fiscal year variant K5 and period end closing is *445
    future we want to use the same fiscal year dependent variant K5 , however the period end closing will be *435
    *445 Periods - 1st month 4th sat, 2nd month 4th sat, 3rd month 5th sat will be the closing periods
      similarly for the rest of the months in a year
    *435 Periods -  1st month 4th month, 2nd month 3rd sat, 3rd month 5th sat will be the closing periods
      similarly for the rest of the months in a year
    Impact on Asset Module and other  modules will be a great help
    Regards
    SB

    Hi Sanjai,
    SAP do not recommend to change a Fiscal Year Variant that has already
    been assigned to a company code and has already some postings. This
    will may create database inconsistencies
    Please check the following SAP notes which will give you an
    idea of some adverse effects that may happen as a result of a change
    based on the modules/components you have implemented in your system.
    427920     Analysis program for fiscal year conversion
    210861     Changing fiscal year variant in production system
    193713     SAPF070: Change of fiscal year variant
    672255     Shortened fiscal year/changing fiscal periods
    The change of the fiscal year or the change of the fiscal periods
    has an effect in many modules, for example, in FI, FI-AA, FI-SL, FI-LC,
    EC-CS, IM, CO, EC-PCA, MM, PP, SD, PS, PM.
    Corresponding risks (for example, data inconsistency, system standstill)
    can arise from incorrect changes to the fiscal year or from incorrect
    changes to the fiscal periods in a live SAP system.
    You can refer to the following wiki page also:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/jYXrCw
    I hope you find this information helpful.
    Regards,
    Jose

  • FI Impact on changing the year dependent fiscal year period from 445 to 435

    Dear Friends,
    May I have your comments on the impact of below change
    Currently using year dependent fiscal year variant K5 and Period closing is *445
    Future we want to use the same year dependent fiscal year variant K5 and period end closing is *435
    *445 Periods - 1st month 4th sat, 2nd month 4th sat, 3rd month 5th sat will be the closing periods
      similarly for the rest of the months in a year.
    *435 Periods - 1st month 4th sat, 2nd month 3rd sat,  3rd month 5th sat will be the closing periods.
      similarly for the rest of the months in a year.
    Impact from FI perspective and other modules would be of great help
    Regards,
    SB

    Hi Sanjai,
    SAP do not recommend to change a Fiscal Year Variant that has already
    been assigned to a company code and has already some postings. This
    will may create database inconsistencies
    Please check the following SAP notes which will give you an
    idea of some adverse effects that may happen as a result of a change
    based on the modules/components you have implemented in your system.
    427920     Analysis program for fiscal year conversion
    210861     Changing fiscal year variant in production system
    193713     SAPF070: Change of fiscal year variant
    672255     Shortened fiscal year/changing fiscal periods
    The change of the fiscal year or the change of the fiscal periods
    has an effect in many modules, for example, in FI, FI-AA, FI-SL, FI-LC,
    EC-CS, IM, CO, EC-PCA, MM, PP, SD, PS, PM.
    Corresponding risks (for example, data inconsistency, system standstill)
    can arise from incorrect changes to the fiscal year or from incorrect
    changes to the fiscal periods in a live SAP system.
    You can refer to the following wiki page also:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/jYXrCw
    I hope you find this information helpful.
    Regards,
    Jose

  • Impact on changing the year dependent fiscal year period from 445 to 435

    Dear Friends,
    May I have your comments on the impact of below change
    Currently using Year Dependent fiscal year variant K5 and period end closing is *445
    Future we want to use the same year dependent fiscal year variant K5, however the period end closing will be *435.
    *445 Periods - 1st month 4th sat, 2nd Month 4th Sat & 3rd Month 5th sat will be the closing periods
    similarily for the rest of the months in a year.
    *435 Periods - 1st month 4th sat, 2nd Month 3rd sat & 3rd Month 5th sat will be the closing periods
    similarly for the rest of the months in a year.
    Regards,
    SB

    Hi Sanjai,
    SAP do not recommend to change a Fiscal Year Variant that has already
    been assigned to a company code and has already some postings. This
    will may create database inconsistencies
    Please check the following SAP notes which will give you an
    idea of some adverse effects that may happen as a result of a change
    based on the modules/components you have implemented in your system.
    427920     Analysis program for fiscal year conversion
    210861     Changing fiscal year variant in production system
    193713     SAPF070: Change of fiscal year variant
    672255     Shortened fiscal year/changing fiscal periods
    The change of the fiscal year or the change of the fiscal periods
    has an effect in many modules, for example, in FI, FI-AA, FI-SL, FI-LC,
    EC-CS, IM, CO, EC-PCA, MM, PP, SD, PS, PM.
    Corresponding risks (for example, data inconsistency, system standstill)
    can arise from incorrect changes to the fiscal year or from incorrect
    changes to the fiscal periods in a live SAP system.
    You can refer to the following wiki page also:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/jYXrCw
    I hope you find this information helpful.
    Regards,
    Jose

  • Jabber and impacting other applications

    We just put in our new Cisco phone system last week. We are seeing some issues running the Jabber client with other programs.
    I have three programs where we have seen some sort of impact.
    First one is runs a live stream to an excel spread sheet. While Jabber is active the application will not stream to the excel spread sheet. As soon as you turn Jabber off it works fine.
    Another application uses MHT files as a form of saving and recording some emails into images that can be retrieved in a workflow. While Jabber is running the files cannot be opened. Some times it just produces an hour glass and sits there. Other times it says the file cannot be opened.
    If you close Jabber completely and then attempt to reopn the file it works just fine.
    I am not sure what the problem is but has anyone experienced similar problems with other applications that stop working?
    We are using Office 2010 and that seems like the connection here since Office apps seemed to be integrated with the other applications in order to provide the fuctionality.                  

    Hi Mal,
    Well I have more details of what I am seeing, but it sounds exactly like what you are seeing.
    The MHT files open up in Internet explorer and it simply hangs until you close Jabber. The instant you close it those files become available. As for the the excel spread sheets. They run off a plugin to a program called bridge reuters. That plug in hooks into excel and streams live feeds to a spread sheet.
    While Jabber is running, its like excel is just hung. Once you close Jabber, excel immediatley starts working with that plugin.
    I do feel your pain. We dont have 4000 clients, we have about 400 but those two problems are processes that 1/2 our staff use so it has become a show stopper for us in the way we intended to use Jabber for presense.
    We just opened up a TAC case as well today so I will post our results if we get anywhere with this issue. We are also using the 9.1.x version and thats perhaps why nobody else has posted about this happening yet.

  • Printing PDF forms to an impact printer

    Greetings,
    I hope I've found the correct forum for this question.
    We are having difficulty printing PDF forms to an impact printer.  We are required by regulations to print to multi-part forms from our GTS landscape, which is going live soon.  Since Adobe is the direction SAP is headed with forms, we have been utilizing ADS.  However, the need for impact printing has presented a problem.  Has anyone utilized PDF printing to an impact printer?  I'll list some details in case it will help.
    Printer: Lexmark Forms Printer 2590
    Backend Print Solution: HP Output Server on AIX
    SAP GTS: NetWeaver 7.0 SP17 w/ SLL-LEG 720 SP7
    Our printer has printer languages of Epson Emulation and Personal Printer Data Stream (PPDS).  Neither of these are included in the standard device types for PDF as specified in OSS Note 685571.  I do not see an appropriate XDC file to copy and modify.
    Has anyone else run into this issue and found a resolution?
    Many thanks for your assistance.
    Wesley Tollett

    the PortName should be changed accordingly.
    if you are using printer port , commonly lpt1, you should change it to lpt1
    ur command line could work , i think
    i've tried it locally in my machine, it works fine.

Maybe you are looking for