File Explorer managing long paths incorrectly and inconsistently

File Explorer is not managing long paths correctly or consistently. On both the C: and D: drives I have copied a folder structure that is more than 500 characters (i.e. well exceeds MAX_PATH limit of 260). In the primary drive, the long path always
seems to be navigable. Some additional drives also work properly. Others can only be navigated to MAX_PATH even though the deeper folders exist and can be accessed from other tools. Specifically I can see the fourth folder on the D: drive but clicking that
folder from windows explorer does nothing. Appending "\\?\" to the front of the D: drive does not change the outcome.
Some, but not all additional drives exhibit this behavior. I have a 250G SSD on SATA that, when mounted as a secondary drive, works properly (like the C: drive) and on this drive deep paths can be navigated. I also have a 750G SSD on PCIe that, when mounted
as a secondary drive, works improperly (like the D: drive) and on this drive deep paths cannot be navigated. All of my large (>2TB) drives work improperly.
This bug also exists on Windows 2012 Server, Windows 10 Technology Preview and presumably all previous versions of Windows. I have submitted it as a problem in Windows 10 technology Preview.
Picture here:
http://www.tenforums.com/attachments/general-discussion/15222d1427150480-windows-10-bugs-long-path-management.png

File Explorer is not managing long paths correctly or consistently. On both the C: and D: drives I have copied a folder structure that is more than 500 characters (i.e. well exceeds MAX_PATH limit of 260). In the primary drive, the long path always
seems to be navigable. Some additional drives also work properly. Others can only be navigated to MAX_PATH even though the deeper folders exist and can be accessed from other tools. Specifically I can see the fourth folder on the D: drive but clicking that
folder from windows explorer does nothing. Appending "\\?\" to the front of the D: drive does not change the outcome.
Some, but not all additional drives exhibit this behavior. I have a 250G SSD on SATA that, when mounted as a secondary drive, works properly (like the C: drive) and on this drive deep paths can be navigated. I also have a 750G SSD on PCIe that, when mounted
as a secondary drive, works improperly (like the D: drive) and on this drive deep paths cannot be navigated. All of my large (>2TB) drives work improperly.
This bug also exists on Windows 2012 Server, Windows 10 Technology Preview and presumably all previous versions of Windows. I have submitted it as a problem in Windows 10 technology Preview.
Picture here:
http://www.tenforums.com/attachments/general-discussion/15222d1427150480-windows-10-bugs-long-path-management.png

Similar Messages

  • Audio recording--files missing, duplicated, long inserted silence, and more

    When we use Captivate 2 to record audio files we find that
    when we go into the "edit timing" option, there are extra periods
    of time--long blank silences--inserted into the project. We have
    also noticed that some clips can get duplicated. We have also had
    issues with the files not saving or, saving, but when we re-open
    the .cp file there are random slides missing their audio files.
    Most of our files are only 4-5 minutes long, but I have been
    working on a 25 minute presentation and it has given me no end of
    problems when i try to save or publish it. captivate stops
    responding and i lose all my audio. any suggestions?

    How large is your Captivate file?
    I've noticed that on closing Captivate with a 100MB file
    there is a significant delay in which Captivate seems to hang. If
    you watch the target directory, the .cp file will "disappear" and
    then reappear after some time, perhaps a minute or more. I'm
    guessing that on my older laptop, Captivate is chugging along
    behind the scenes, manipulating temp files or the like.
    To cope, I'm using a brute force approach in which I have two
    versions of each audio file: a tiny placeholder and the actual
    audio file. The files are named the same but stored in folders
    named Tiny (10 sec of silence) and Big (the actual audio file). I
    use a third folder, named Working, to import audio. From
    Captivate's point of view all audio paths point to the Working
    folder.
    When I'm editing slide 15, I copy the tiny files for slides
    1-14 into the working folder, overwriting the existing files. Then
    I update the audio for slides 1-14, using the library's update
    tool. As a result, the project size slims back down and saving the
    project no longer take so long. At the end, I copy the full files
    into the working folder, update, and publish.
    As you might imagine audio file naming conventions are
    important . You need to be able to see at a glance which audio goes
    with which slides. If I use Captivate to record audio, I export the
    file so I can store it in Big and then rename a copy of a tiny file
    to match it.
    The down side is that the timing on closed captions seems to
    be affected by substituting the tiny file for the full slide audio.
    So, I wait to set up the timing for closed captions until the end
    when I publish using the full files.
    Even as I write this I wince. I certainly hope someone else
    will suggest a more elegant way. My approach is not at all pretty
    I've found it less frustrating than working with a sluggish
    Captivate and putting up with the hangs I experienced prior to
    using tiny files.
    Doc

  • File Explorer / Manager

    Hi, i'm a university student and my project consists of creating a simple File Manager (Windows Explorer like)
    but without the tree. My aim is to have a window that displays all the files and subdirectories of a specified root directory. My file manager will have few features, only "file-selection" and when I double-click on a directory, it displays the files and subdirectories of this one.
    Please can anyone help me on how implementing the part of my project (displaying the files + basic features described above)
    thanx

    The only relatively easy way you can create the actual graphics for folders and other made up graphics is with a bean builder. I would suggest reading up on beanbox and javabeans if you want to do this. These topics are discussed in the java tutorials on the www.java.sun homepage.
    If designing you own GUI with a bean builder, you will have to use a mouselistener on the component to respond to mouse clicks, drags, etc.
    An easier way would be to use a component that has already been designed.....maybe a JList? Using something like that might not give you the exact look you want but it will be much faster and easier to design and code. JList is designed to be linked with other components.......good luck.

  • Question about Windows File Explorer and offline attribute display

    In previous releases of Windows (including Windows 8), Windows File Explorer would display a small "x" icon if the offline file attribute was set.  In Windows 8.1, Windows File Explorer no longer displays the "x" icon if the offline
    file attribute is set.  Is there a reason this behavior was changed?  Is there an option to get the old behavior of displaying the "x" icon?

    Hello Ed Winn,
    What ‘x’ icon do you mean?
    Please share us the screenshots to compare.
    Based on my test, I can’t find the ‘x’ icon in the offline folder both in Windows 7 and Windows 8.1.
    Best regards,
    Fangzhou CHEN
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • File Explorer File Enumeration Slowdown in Windows 8.1 - Why?

    File enumeration in Windows 8.1 appears to be slowing down.
    Here's what I mean:
    On a freshly rebooted system (i.e., with few files in the cache), open a File Explorer window on the root folder of drive C:.
    Select all the files, then right-click and choose Properties.
    TIME how long it takes to finish, and divide the number of files enumerated by the seconds it took to do the enumeration.
    Do it again now that the data is all cached.
    I've always thought this was a decent way to gauge real world file system responsiveness, and in fact it really was a pretty good benchmark up until Windows 8.1 came along.  With Windows 8(.0) and earlier, if you saw more than 30,000 files per
    second counted up, you had a very good SSD setup.
    On the workstation on which I'm typing this, my Windows 7 x64 installation would enumerate about 30,000 files per second the first time, and about 50,000 files per second the second time, from the RAM cache.  I have a very responsive I/O subsystem.
    When Windows 8 came out the numbers were about the same, if not a little better.
    When Win 8.1 was released they dropped BIG TIME.  File enumeration was something like 3 to 1 slower.
    Now, with the updates in past months, they appear to have dropped even further!
    Right now, with a fresh bootup I am seeing just under 6,000 files per second enumerated the first time, and a bit over 8,000 from the cached data.  This is DISMAL by comparison to earlier versions.
    Thankfully, typical file system performance - as measured by how long it takes to do real work on a few files in real applications - doesn't seem to have been affected as much, but then most applications don't enumerate lots of files. 
    It seems likely that this enumeration slowdown affects real operations in Explorer beyond just this file count.
    Keep in mind I can run a Windows 7 VM or Windows 8.0 VM on this same hardware and still see 30,000 files/second enumerated inside the VM.  My hardware hasn't degraded.  The older Windows systems are still just as fast.  If
    I run a Win 8.1 VM the 6 to 1 slowdown is obvious.
    That even the RAM-cached directory data can't be run through nearly as quickly in Win 8.1 says that the slowdown is in the file system implementation.
    This isn't a question about why MY workstation is slowing down - it's not.  It's about why WINDOWS is becoming less and less efficient out of the box.  I have measured and compared progressive slowdowns in virtual machine snapshots
    ranging from a fresh, out-of-box installation of Win 8 or 8.1, to one that's been run for years.  Something's becoming less efficient IN THE DESIGN.
    So...
    Why is File Explorer taking longer and longer to simply count up files in folders?
    A corollary question is:  What else is this slowdown affecting?  Explorer doesn't seem as responsive to me as it once did.
    I'd hate to think Microsoft is slipping stuff into Windows to cause it to be slower and slower since its release date, just so they can make it look like the next version is faster.
    -Noel
    Detailed how-to in my eBooks:  
    Configure The Windows 7 "To Work" Options
    Configure The Windows 8 "To Work" Options

     the slowdown is in File Explorer, rather than the file system itself.
    Want some more proof?  And proof that your system is caching the data that is needed.  And proof that stuff may be being ignored by WE which should be counted...
    In an elevated cmd window at the desired drive root enter:
    D:\>dir/a/s | findstr "File(s) Dir(s)"
    The surprise for me is the way the pipe seems to work?   Is it really a separate process that doesn't have to wait for the completion of the first stage's output?
    Anyway, I might be willing to time that--in fact, it may be possible to automate its timing--but I am definitely not interested in hanging around waiting for the number of
    minutes that WE takes to be sure I get an accurate measurement--if you know what I mean.   <eg>
    And apparently that would not be a fair comparison anyway.  WE only finds 2/3 in Size of what the dir finds.  I probably need to tweak WE's Options.  Finding only 2/3 of what another procedure is finding seems suspect even if it does
    take an absurd amount of time longer.  The funny thing is that the number of files is almost the same.  So, what does that imply: that 1/3 of the Size was contained by some very few which could not be counted?
    I should probably also try to convert that pipeline to Powershell and see how it does.  That could at least check the dir measurements in one way or another.  TBD.
    BTW I think I am now on a faster processor than I had with my tx2 but this Surface 2 Pro even with 8 GB RAM still doesn't "scream" for me.  I have noticed that its firmware shuts down cores occasionally. 
    My guess is that could be due to its lack of cooling.  My tx2 always had its fans running full.  Maybe I will get a different result if I do this test in the winter than now in the middle of summer?   <eg>
    Robert Aldwinckle

  • How to hide items on Windows 8 File Explorer Ribbon

    Scenario
    This article describes how to hide items on the file explorer ribbon in Windows 8 and Windows 8.1.
    Method
    We can implement it via customizing the permission of the related registry keys.
    Note: Before you make changes to a registry key or subkey, we recommend that you export, or make a backup copy, of the key or subkey.
    Before you make changes to a registry key or subkey, we recommend that you
    export, or make a backup copy, of the key or subkey.
    Step 1:
    Open
    Registry Editor and locate to following registry key under which you can find the corresponding keys of the items on the File Explorer Ribbon.
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\CommandStore\shell\
    In the following figure, it shows the Add a network location item on the file explorer ribbon, and the corresponding
    registry key in Registry Editor.
    Step 2:
    Take ownership of the registry key
    Note: You can take ownership
    of a registry key if you are logged on as an administrator or if you have been specifically assigned the permission to take ownership of the registry key by the current owner.
    Right-click on the registry key which you want to take ownership of,
    and then select
    Permissions... option.
    Click on
    Advanced button to grant special permissions in the key.
    At the top to the right of the current
    Owner, click on the Change link.
    Enter
    Administrator in the Enter the object name to select
    box, and then click on Check Names.
    Click on
    OK twice to apply.
    Step 3:
    Change the permission of the registry key.
    On
    Permissions for the key name display dialog, click
    Administrators in the Group or user names window, and then select the
    Allow check box for
    Full Control
    option.
    Click
    Users in the Group or user names window, and then select the
    Deny
    check box for
    Full Control
    option.
    Step 4:
    Click on
    Apply and OK to save the changes and the following figure shows the modified permissions and owner.
    Step 5:
    When you open File Explorer, the item you would like to hide disappears. For your information, the following is an example:
    Item: Add a network location
    Corresponding Registry key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\CommandStore\shell\Windows.AddNetworkLocation
    For advanced users
    You can also deploy script with Set-Acl which is a PowerShell command to take ownership and change permissions
    of the keys. For your information, please refer to the following articles to learn more about this command:
    Set-Aclhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh849810.aspx
    SET-ACL on registry key
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/brad_rutkowski/archive/2008/09/29/set-acl-on-registry-key.aspx
    Apply to
    Windows 8
    Windows 8.1
    Welcome to your feedbacks.
    Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

    The reason they gave was it is possible for the file to stay open when done with the file. (not properly closing) As the driver would be accessing the file to retrieve the thumbnail.
    The thing is a driver is nothing more than a program it self. Therefore it is capable of opening and closing a file and placing the thumbnail into the database for that folder. It then would be capable to verify if the thumbnail exists in that database. Since the driver only has to run when explorer is open in that folder's view, it really is not running that often.
    The catch I can see it when both Illustrator and explorer are running at the same time. Which one should close the file? The solution would be a small app that verifies that both programs are running and has control of clean up when both have closed. The driver and Illustrator could also in theory check and see if the other is running, if it is do nothing if not then close the file.
    So it really boils down to having the driver and Illustrator talking to each other.

  • CS5 crash when right-clicking on a file in a file explorer

    Every time I go to open or save a file in Photoshop or Illustrator from the file menu, if I right-click an existing file that is showing in the file explorer window for open/save and try to select properties (I often need to do this when over-writing an existing file to make sure the dimensions are the correct file) the Photoshop or Illustrator freezes up and then crashes.
    Does any one else experience this problem?
    Any one know of a fix other than a re-install or "don't do that"?
    Thanks!

    Sorry, thought I posted that this is happening in Win 7. It's strictly happening with Adobe products which use the antiquated Win 95 style file explorers.
    No file permission issues. Doubtfully a virus scanner issue. It's a context menu issue solely with Adobe.
    I can give you the full specs of my PC and software, but I'm really just looking for someone else who's experience the problem. If no one else then I'll try a reinstall. Would just be nice if Adobe CS5 didn't use the crappy old Win 95 style file explorers...

  • File Open Manager

    I have installed the latest Adobe Reader X (version 10.1.3).  When I open the application I get an error "File Open Manager service not running" and "Plug-in will not be loaded".  I have tried repair (no change).  I have tried to restart the service (no success). I am running Windows XP Professional.

    Do you have any 3rd party plugin by the name of File Open Manager installed on your system?
    If so, then it seems like the same is not compatible with Reader 10.1.3 which is causing the issue at your end. You may need to contact the plug-in support staff to get some more help regarding the same.
    As of now, please remove the plug-in from your system by navigating to Control Panel > Add/Remove Programs ion order to be able to launch Reader successfully.

  • SCP, SSH and SFTP in CMD / File-Explorer and SSH key management with Windows Credential Manger

    Please add SSH, SFTP and SCP in CMD and File Explorer.
    Also, allow us to copy to FTP in File Explorer.
    Would be nice to have the SSH credentials managed by Windows Credentials Manager.

    Even with the RHEL firewall completely disabled, it has the same upper limit. SCP between the Solaris systems, with ipfilter running on both systems and both systems on completely different networks, is not a problem. Between Solaris and RHEL, same network but different subnet, RHEL with no firewall running (only while troubleshooting this, don't panic), still a problem. Using PuTTY SFTP from/to any of the systems is fine, even though on different networks. The mtu on the RHEL was the same as the Solaris systems (1500) - changing values on the RHEL increased the upper limit but still hit a ceiling. Only have one RHEL system so I can't see whether RHEL-RHEL transfers are affected, only those between Solaris, PuTTY on Windows, and the one RHEL system.

  • Rescue and Recovery: is long path and file name OK?

    I am using T61 6466 5wG. For full system backup I am using R&R 4.21, and a WD Mybook USB HDD. I did regular backup before using R&R. When a virus attack happened, I tried to recovery my computer, but then I found I only get the folders back while not the files inside. Then I tried to find something back by using the function of "restore individual files", but nothing found still. Most of the lost files have common features, either very long file name or very long folder and path name. One noticing that the size of each backup file is pretty large and reasonable.
    So I am wondering what was actually happened to my backup and restore? Is it a backup failure or a restore failure? Dose the R&R have problem with very long file names or path names? If it is only a restore failure, is there any possibilty to find my old files back?

    thanks for the info.,you could also try long path tool. it helped me with error 1320 in Win 7.,

  • Error: "We're having a problem opening this location on file explorer. Add this website to your trusted sites list and try again"

    Hello,
    When i try to open document library from SharePoint Production portal then it throws the specified error. However, when i open document library from SharePoint Development portal then it opens it in file explorer quite easily.
    Production portal is on https whereas development portal is on http. Also, UAG has been configured on production portal.
    Any idea where it's getting stuck up? Surely, this is not a browser issue on Windows 7 as it's opening the development portal's document library on the same machine.
    I've also done following things:
    - Configured Desktop Experience on production environment
    - Installed the hotfix for Windows 7
    Regards,
    Sohaib
    Sohaib Khan

    Hello Sohaib.
    Here is the list of causes defined here.Hope it helps you
    The cause and the resolution methods are the following:
    Cause: There is a missing Root site collection...
    Resolution: Check and ensure,  that the “Managed Paths” are not changed in the web Application’s page, there is a (root) explicit for
    this web application and there is a working Root site collection.
    If for any reason this is not the case in your environment, you may try the following:
    - Apply (if not already) the following Hotfix to one of those clients:
    Error when you open a SharePoint Document Library in Windows Explorer or map a network drive to the library after you install Internet Explorer 10 in Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2 
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2846960
    Then, try to delete the cache of the IE browser before reproducing the issue. Check the result..
    - Try to temporarily disable the Antivirus and test again.
    - Check if you have installed the Desktop Experience feature on the SPS13 server.
    - Check if you face this behavior with all users, Or only with some specific ones, Or with all different client OSes.. 
    Otherwise you will need to collect the logs to further analyze...
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/george_bethanis/archive/2013/11/04/sps13-quot-open-with-explorer-quot-random-error-quot-we-re-having-a-problem-opening-this-location-in-file-explorer-add-this-web-site-to-your-trusted-sites-list-and-try-again-quot.aspx
    Please remember to click 'Mark as Answer' on the answer if it helps you

  • Offline Files (Background) Sync makes File Explorer and other programs responding slow

    Hi TechNet,
    I have a problem with Offline Files and
    especially with VPN users.
    For VPN users, the slow-link
    policy is activated with a background
    sync interval of one hour. But, when Offline Files is syncing, their File Explorer is hanging (not responding) by creating new files/folders, deleting files/folder, or rename files/folders. This happens only in their (redirected)UserData
    folder or with other DFS shares which are cached locally. In other programs (Outlook or Office 2010) when they save data in the UserData folder exactly the same things happens (not responding).
    This problem occurs in both the
    internal network and via VPN, so bandwidth is
    not the problem. When the sync is finished, everything is working fine again.
    I've tested:
    - Offline mode with scheduled background sync: problem occurs
    - Online mode with manual sync: problem occurs
    - Rebuild offline cache database: no effect
    - Tested with fresh Windows 8(.1) installations and user profiles: problem occurs
    - Monitoring SMB traffic with WireShark: no result
    - Montoring Windows 8(.1) clients with procmon: no result
    - Tested with full DFS paths: problem occurs
    - Disable IPv6: problem occurs
    - Disable Windows Search: problem occurs
    - Browsing in the Offline Files folder (Sync Center -> Manage Offline Files -> View Offline Files) is very slow (with +- 200 files). This occurs also when Offline Files is not syncing.
    Does anyone have an idea how I can solve this problem?
    Thanks,
    Bas
    (Sorry for my bad English)

    Hello,
    May I know if there is any update there?
    Please let me know if I can help you more, thanks.
    BR,
    Steven Song
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
      Hello Steven,
      First, sorry for the late response, I have tested a few things for you:
    Offline mode with background sync over a VPN connection: During scheduled sync File Explorer hangs. When bypass the cache by using a UNC path (State: Online) there is also a delay, but this is caused by bandwidth.
    Online Mode with Manual Sync over a LAN connection: During sync File Explorer hangs in (redirected)UserData Folders (They are always available offline, maybe this is a problem?). With UNC paths, there is no delay…
    The first folder/file is created slowly, but the second is fast.
    It's like csc
    still
    must initialize
    the cache…or something…
    I m  I made some
    print screens, but I can not upload them because my account is not verified.......
    trT  Thanks,
     Bas

  • I can not download any files, i think i by misstake put the download manager in the trash and then deleted it, what should i do? I am not so shore what the program is called in English( in Swedish:filhämtare) but it looks like a little grey box

    Hi, i really need help... I think i by accident deleted the "download manager" i´m not shore what the program is called in English ( Swedish : filhämtaren), but its symbol looks like a grey little box and when you download a file it appears on a list and is then saved in this program. I don`t know how i didn´t see it in the trash, but somehow i deleted this program by mistake. And as a consequence i can no longer open/download any files. I just got my macbook pro and i do love the system but i am now unsure about what i should do with this problem since i am not that terribly good with computers.... Is there any way you can fix this?

    soffi h wrote:
    Hi, i really need help... I think i by accident deleted the "download manager" i´m not shore what the program is called in English ( Swedish : filhämtaren), but its symbol looks like a grey little box
    If it looks like this:
    It's called an "installer.app"
    You can custom install the "installer.app" directly from your System DVD that originally came w/your computer.  It will be either inside the "Bundled Software" folder or inside the "Applications" folder.

  • Whenever you try to save a PDF file to a location other than the default location ('My Documents'), Firefox freezes & you have to go to the 'Task Manager' to exit Firefox and stop the error, so you can load Firefox again.

    Whenever you try to save a PDF file to a location other than the default location ('My Documents'), Firefox freezes & you have to go to the 'Task Manager' to exit Firefox and stop the error. I have Windows XP (Media Center Edition) and all updates (Firefox, Adobe PDF, Microsoft, virus protection, etc) are installed. This has only been a problem since Firefox 4, and isn't a problem in Internet Explorer.

    Hi David,
    Thank you for your detailed question. It sounds like the real issue is pdf files. Are there any antivirus/firewalls that might be blocking this specific file type? or are there any preferences in your control panel that might be blocking this?
    Do you have any stored preferences for PDF files in Firefox?
    *[[Applications panel - Set how Firefox handles different types of files]]

  • LSMW : Unable to Specify Files . Logical path incorrect ?

    Hi Guys,
    I am trying to upload Goods movement Using the Standard LSMW 0110 program RM07MMBL.
    When I try to execute the step Specify Files ,system displays an error message "No Logical Path specified."
    The Source File is in my Local PC .
    When I click the Converted Data File in the Specify files list
    I get a popup which asks me for a Logical path and a Logical File and both these parameters a mandatory.
    I tried to maintain the parameters and entries in transaction FILE also.
    But it says 'logical path not assigned to the physical directory.'
    What is the correct method for this.
    What steps should I follow ..
    Pls advice
    Message was edited by: hao fu

    Hi,
      Refer the oss note 753511 released for this kind of error you face in LSMW, I am pasting the content of the note below,
    ******************Note Content,
    Symptom
    The system issues an error message for the logical path or file when you perform the "Specify files" step in the Legacy System Migration Workbench (transaction LSMW) although you have made the correct assignment in transaction FILE.
    The error messages are as follows:
    The logical path <PATH> does not point to the physical directory.
    The logical file <FILE> is not assigned to the physical file.
    or
    A logical path was not specified.
    Other terms
    Logical path, logical file, transaction FILE, LSM Workbench
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Some import interfaces that you can also use with transaction LSMW work with logical path and file names.
    Transaction LSMW itself, however, works with physical file names. To be able to transfer the LSMW file with the converted data to the import program, you must specify a logical file name for the file with the converted data in addition to the physical file name. In this case, the system displays additional fields in the 'Specify files' step in which you must enter the logical path and file name.
    Solution
    The error messages may be due to several causes. Check the following:
    Have you maintained the logical path and logical file name and have you assigned them to the physical file specified in the "File" input field of transaction LSMW?
    These settings are maintained in transaction FILE.
    When you use logical file and path names, you must specify the name of the physical file with its path. If you have not specified any directory, you cannot assign any directory to the logical path in transaction FILE. In this case, the system uses the SAP Home directory on the application server by default. Bear in mind that the file name must not exceed the maximum length of 45 characters, including the path.
    Up to LSMW version 1.7.2 (*):
    If the logical file name specified does not point to the physical file (although it should do), the system adjusts the logical file name, that is, the information in transaction FILE is changed to the entries made in transaction LSMW. This may lead to unwanted side effects if the logical file is also used somewhere else. Therefore, SAP recommend that you always use separate logical paths and file names for transaction LSMW (the problem is corrected as of LSMW version 1.8.0, see below). If the logical file does not exist yet, it will be created upon request.
    As of LSMW version 1.8.0 (*):
    The settings of the logical file are checked but no longer adjusted automatically as in version 1.7.2 (see above). If there are inconsistencies, the system issues an error message. If the user is authorized to maintain logical paths and file names (as for transaction FILE: "Maintenance authorization for cross-client tables"), transaction LSMW can create the logical path, the file name and the file. Due to this automatic generation, the user no longer needs to make adjustments in transaction FILE. Therefore, we especially recommend this procedure.
    To display the version of transaction LSMW, select "Extras" --> "Display LSMW version" in the main menu of the initial screen.
    You should also bear in mind that as of Basis Release 6.20, that is, as of LSMW version 4.0, transaction LSMW is no longer an add-on but is delivered with the standard system.
    Hope this helps,
    Rgds,

Maybe you are looking for