FIM 2010 Workflow Processing Issue

Hi All,
We are having a problem with FIM 2010 (Update Rollup 2) workflow processing.
Background is:
            Set: Object State 2 set (criteria based membership, criteria includes AUX_Attr1 ‘NOT Equal’ 3)
            Set Object State 3 Set (Manually managed membership)
WF1: set AUX_Attr1 to 3
WF2 : Set AUX_Attr1 to 2
MPR 1: Transition in MPR (Transition set = Object State 2 set), fires WF2
MPR 2: Transition in MPR (Transition Set = Object State 3 Set), fires WF1
What we are seeing is the following:
            We add a user to “Object State 3 Set”
From the request history we can see that:
The successful request for the set membership change (transition in Object State 3 Set)
The successful request by the Forefront Identity Manager Service Account to set AUX_Attr1 to 3
and FIM correctly fires MPR 2, this sets AUX_Attr1 to 3 and this has been verified by looking through the request history
            A couple of seconds later FIM fires WF2 which sets AUX_Attr1 back to 2.
            The request history shows no signs of the object transitioning back into “Object State 2 set” so I am unsure why this
workflow would trigger again.

Best thing to do with this problem is look at the request that caused this to happen and look for parent requests and for the applied policies
David Lundell, Get your copy of FIM Best Practices Volume 1 http://blog.ilmbestpractices.com/2010/08/book-is-here-fim-best-practices-volume.html

Similar Messages

  • SharePoint foundation 2010 workflow performance issue

    I need clarification for the below issue.
    I have designed state machine approval workflow through VS2010.
    It was worked fine for 3 months and now it is taking long time for each level of execution.
    I have checked the running workflow instances in site, it is around 1800 instances for each sub site.
    Application: SharePoint Foundation 2010                                                                              
    Farm configuration
    Web server
    Application Server
    Database Server
    Processor
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    RAM
    8 GB
    8 GB
    14 GB
    OS
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Anandhan.S Remember to 'mark or propose as answer' or 'vote as helpful' as appropriate.

    I have done the below configuration in production servers. Still the problem exists.
    System took around 13 hours+ to proceed to next approver. Suggest some ideas to increase workflow performance.
    Decreased DB server memory configuration
    (Database server)
    Maximum memory in SQL server reduced from
    10GB to 8GB.
    Increased Workflow throttle configurations
    (Application & Web server)
    PS C:\Windows\system32> stsadm -o getproperty -pn
    workflow-eventdelivery-throttle <Property Exist="Yes" Value="150" />
    (Default value is 15)
    PS C:\Windows\system32> stsadm -o getproperty -pn
    workitem-eventdelivery-batchsize <Property Exist="Yes" Value="150" />
    (Default value is 100)
    PS C:\Windows\system32> stsadm -o getproperty -pn
    workflow-eventdelivery-timeout <Property Exist="Yes" Value="10" />
    (Default value is 5)
    PS C:\Windows\system32> stsadm -o getproperty -pn
    job-workflow -url http://myweb:1333 <Property Exist="Yes" Value="Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30" />
    (Default - Property Exists = “No”)
    Site collection analytics
    Sub-Site1: Total running workflow instances: 302
    Sub-Site 2: Total running workflow instances: 58
    Sub-Site 3: Total running workflow instances: 1234
    Sub-Site 4: Total running workflow instances: 2
    Sub-Site 5: Total running workflow instances: 2306
    Sub-Site 6: Total running workflow instances: 512
    Sub-Site 7: Total running workflow instances: 1631
    Sub-Site 8: Total running workflow instances: 7
    Sub-Site 9: Total running workflow instances: 38
    Sum of workflow instances from all sites:
    6090….
    Farm configuration
    Web server
    Application Server
    Database Server
    Processor
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-26670 0 @2.90GHz 2.89GHz
    RAM
    8 GB
    8 GB
    14 GB
    OS
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 SP 1
    Anandhan.S Remember to 'mark or propose as answer' or 'vote as helpful' as appropriate.

  • Unable to process your request in FIM 2010 R2.

    Hi,
    Unable to process your request in FIM 2010 R2 sp1 when we hit the URL https://Machinename/Identitymanagerment/default.aspx.
    This was working when we installed fresh FIM Synchronization service and FIM 2010 r2 sp1 Portal but now it is not working for me.i have uninstalled FIM 2010 Portal and delete FIMService database and again installed still gives the same message
    Unable to process your request .
    NOTE:I am implementing FIM 2010 R2 SSPR and gives all reuired cofiguration for this as per Microsoft documents.
    Regards
    Anil Kumar  

    I make the changes in the  web.config file at location
     C:\inetpub\wwwroot\wss\VirtualDirectories\80  on FIM server and added  the
    requireKerberos=”true”  as per the FIM installation
    document. Restarted the IIS and reboot the server. After that unable to login on the FIM Portal, However, SharePoint  URL is working fine.
    Please help me to resolve the issue.
    Anil

  • FIM 2010 - Set Population not kicking off workflow

    Hi,
    I am having a problem with Set Transition kicking of a MPR, in FIM 2010 R2 which I have never seen before after numerous implementations of both FIM and FIM R2. 
    Scenario: 
    My MPR kicks off a workflow which adds 6 sync rules, to users based on the "set transition in" set with criteria IsADConnected=true.
    The user is transitioned into this set but the MPR never fires. Everything is enabled and I have checked everything obvious. When I view the set in the "Sets" screen in FIM I can see that the user has transitioned in, and is a computed member based
    on my criteria "IsADConnected=true"
    The "FIM_MaintainSetsJob" job runs at 1am which auto corrects set membership and this does cause the MPR to kick off and consequently the sync rules to be applied. So it does work, just not when it should.
     What I have tried to fix this:
    Created a new workflow, set and MPR which does exactly the same job as the "broken" Set/MPR/workflow - Same thing happens (ie. it doesn't work)
    I read on one post that someone re-indexed the FIM service database and this fixed it for them - I tried this also but no joy. (some indexes were at 98/99% but they have been reduced after reindexing)  
    Has anyone ran into this issue before and does anyone have any idea what can cause it? It's doing my head in at this stage!
    Thanks
    Paul

    I ran into the same problem using the pattern for expected state detection:
    /Person[DetectedRulesList = Set[ObjectID='<GUID of the Set with the DREs>']/ComputedMember]
    Pasted from <http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff608269(v=ws.10).aspx> 
    My users weren't transitioning into the set when they got a DRE.  Went on a wild goose chase until I saw this post.  Enabling the
    FIM_MaintainSetsJob fixed
    the problem.  Pretty frustrating... 

  • How do I add my Custom Workflow Activity to FIM 2010 R2 SP1 installed on Windows 2012 server?

    Hellos.
    I have tried and failed to add my custom.dll into the Windows Server 2012  GAC.
    We have a version of FIM 2010 R2 Sp1 running on Windows Server 2008 R2 and that was no problem. There seemed to be a gacutil.exe present on the system which added my assembly.
    I cannot find gacutil.exe on the Windows 2012 Server.
    I have downloaded and installed Windows SDK for Windows 8. However, when I try the gacutil.exe /i <myCustom.dll> nothing seems to happen.
    Are there any guidelines how to add custom workflow activities to FIM when installed on a Windows Server 2012 system?
    TIA
    *HH

    Well yes. It is fine when FIM is hosted on Windows Server 2008 R2.My difficulty is that I am using FIM 2010 R2 Sp1 and Windows Server 2012. No GACutility executable.
    However, the problem has been resolved. Powershell can be used to modify the assemblies.
    I opened a RunAs Administrator PS session. My assembly is in folder c:\Temp
    Using Windows Explorer I browsed the folder c:\windows\assembly and noted the System.EnterpriseServices entries: version (2.0.0.0) and public key token (b03f5f7f11d50a3a)
    (My version is 2.0.0.0 because when installing FIM and SharePoint 2013 the instructions I used suggested setting .Net version to be 2.0)
    These powershell commands got me going...
    PS C:\temp> [System.Reflection.Assembly]::Load("System.EnterpriseServices, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a")
    GAC    Version        Location
    True   v4.0.30319     C:\Windows\Microsoft.Net\assembly\GAC_64\System.EnterpriseServices\v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50...
    PS C:\temp> $publish = New-Object System.EnterpriseServices.Internal.Publish
    PS C:\temp> $publish.GacInstall("c:\temp\RunPowershellLibrary.dll")
    PS C:\temp>
    PS C:\temp>
    PS C:\temp> iisreset
    Amazingly I can see the assembly RunPowershellLibrary in my Windows 2012 GAC. :-)
    Also, what is more cheering is that the custom activity actually works with FIM 2010 R2 Sp1.

  • Refresh workflow item issue after task processing

    Hi expert,
    We have a urgent client issue regarding work item in SAP inbox. I am new in workflow process.
    He has 142 work item in his inbox for invoce processing. But he has processed 70 from them. After processing these 70 invoices, all processed workitem should be gone from his workitem list. But some of wotkitem which has been processed, are still there in his inbox after refreshing inbox. I have check standard task TS30001128 has been used in workitem.
    Please sggest.
    Also How we can find workflow from TS30001128. Each work item has a workflow id. How we can check it?
    Regards
    Anutosh

    Hello,
    To find where a task is used, go to e.g. PFTC_DIS, fill in Standard Task and the task number, click Display, then click on where-used.
    For this case, I would look at the user's inbox in SWI5 and then click on the list of workitems to see the workflow log. It should tell you why the workitem is coming back (if he really did refresh).
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    hanabi technology

  • SPD 2010 Workflow: Issue with Associated Column

    We have a SP2010 Workflow that is attached to a Content Type and mapped in the Retention Policy settings. This workflow uses a DateTime column which is used within the Workflow and hence the DateTime column is used within the Workflow as an Associated Column.
    The issue being faced is that when we manually run the workflow, it runs successfully and is able to get the value of the associated column. When the Retention Timer job starts the workflow, we find that the Workflow is not able to get the value of the Associated
    Column (this we realized by logging messages to a List).
    Any pointers/guidance on how to overcome this issue is much appreciated.
    Blog: http://dotnetupdate.blogspot.com |

    Thanks for the suggestions. 
    From the debugging there is no issue from a functionality perspective or the date calculations. It works perfectly well when we manually run the workflow or if I set the workflow to start when an item is uploaded.
    The behavior is different when the same workflow is getting triggered from a Retention Policy as a Stage. Is this something to do with access permissions or security context when a SPD 2010 Workflow gets triggered by a Timer Job/Retention Policy? 
    Regards,
    Vikram
    Blog: http://dotnetupdate.blogspot.com |

  • FIM 2010 R2 Sp1, Windows 2008 R2 SP1 and Recycle Bin issues

    Hi,
    We are running FIM 2010 R2 Sp1 (build 4.1.3613.0)
    Also running Windows 2008 R2 Forest and Domain functional level environment. (Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 on all DCs). The previous Recycle Bin hotfix https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/979214/ fails to install since we are already running WS08 R2 SP1
    on all the DCs.
    During deprovisioning, when a user is deleted from the source HR system, FIM deletes the object from AD, FIM Sync & Portal.
    FIM also manages a FIM Portal group, where membership is assigned manually. This membership is then updated in AD.
    When a user (who is part of this group) is deleted in HR, FIM deletes it from AD, FIM Sync, FIM Portal, FIM also removes user from FIM Portal group. The user is also removed from the AD group (by FIM group object membership attribute flow to AD)
    ...however, on the next AD Export, FIM fails to update the same group and complains about this very same user (CD Error) and lists the user as: CN=username\0ADEL:GUID, CN=Deleted Objects,DC=domain,DC=com
    It appears that there is a problem with FIM and the Recycle Bin again?
    Are there any new Recycle Bin/FIM hotfixes ?
    Thanks,
    SK

    May I suggest you review the following:
    Is the AD MA user account part of the Domain Admins group? If yes, please remove it from this Group
    Verify that the "CN=Deleted Objects" container has not somehow been included in the AD MA OU scope

  • Issue Setting Resource Attributes via Workflow Process

    I'm currently trying to set resource attributes via a workflow process, but for whatever reason the attribute is not detected as "changed" and the update object has nothing about the attribute. I'm wondering if I'm just doing something wrong with the way I'm setting it, or if I'm missing a piece to apply the upate.
    What I'm doing is...
    1. Checking out the user view
    2. updating the attribute via code something like this...
    <set name='user.accounts[ldap].attributeIWantToChange'>
    Logic in here
    </set>
    3. then I'm checking the view back in.
    Anyone know why this isn't working(I can set other attributes like waveset.roles fine this way)?
    Edited by: UNO-AD-HM on Jul 6, 2009 12:54 PM

    Figured it out, have to load a different form in when I check the view out, the tabbed user's form will not update resource attributes.

  • Cannot Access Custom Workflow Process List (SharePoint 2007)

    Does anyone know how to access the "Custom Workflow Process" list when using custom form actions in SharePoint 2007?
    There are quite a few items in this list and I need to reduce the list item size.
    Thank you for checking!

    Did you try below script
    social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/powershell-script-to-list-out-webparts-used-in-publishing-pages-in-sharepoint-2007-and-sharepoint-2010-sites.aspx
    param([switch]$help)
    [void][System.Reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("Microsoft.SharePoint")
    [void][System.Reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing")
    function GetHelp() {
    $HelpText = @"
    DESCRIPTION:
    This script will list out the webparts type along with the names in publishing pages in any site .
    $HelpText
    function RahulPublishingPageWebParts() {
    write-host "This script will enlist the webparts used in all publishing pages in this site"
    write-host "Please enter theURL of the site"
    $siteURL = read-host
    $site = New-Object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite($siteURL)
    $web = $site.OpenWeb()
    $webPublish = [Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.PublishingWeb]::GetPublishingWeb($web)
    $pages = $webPublish.GetPublishingPages()
    foreach($page in $pages)
    $manager = $web.GetLimitedWebPartManager($page.Url,[System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.PersonalizationScope]::Shared)
    $webCollection = $manager.WebParts
    if($webCollection.Count -ne 0)
    write-host "The page " $page.Title " contains these webparts"
    for($i =0;$i -lt $webCollection.Count; $i++)
    write-host ($i + 1).ToString() " " $webCollection[$i].GetType().Name " " $webCollection[$i].Title
    $site.Dispose()
    $web.Dispose()
    if($help)
    GetHelp; Continue
    else
    RahulPublishingPageWebParts
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

  • Prevent Sharepoint 2010 workflow to send duplicate emails

    I have SharePoint 2013 as environment but am using SharePoint 2010 workflow on a list. There is a field in this list called "Order Status" which has different status such as Processing, Shipped, Cancelled, Hold. There is another list which updates
    this Order Status. I have the workflow send out an email when the Order Status changes to Processing and another email when Order Status changes to Shipped.
    The issue is that there are multiple emails being sent out when any of these status changes to either Processing or Shipped. There is no other workflow attached to this list 
    How do I prevent the workflow to send duplicate emails? I have seen that a flag could be setup to track the email sent once but that method does not work correctly and it still sends out duplicate emails. Or maybe I am not doing this correctly
    Any suggestions, comments or have anyone resolved this successfully
    Thanks Snehal H.Rana SharePoint Consultant

    Hi Snehal
    If you check the workflow history, you will probably see that every time an item is added or modified, the workflow runs twice. That’s why you’re receiving two email notifications. 
    The reason for this is timing. If your workflow is very short and the SharePoint server is very slow, the first instance of the workflow may finish well before the item is fully saved and committed to SharePoint. As the item is being processed, the workflow
    event receiver can fire again, and start another instance of the workflow.
    The solution for this problem is to add a step at the end of your workflow which will pause the workflow for a few minutes .
    Another Option is to use a Flag.For Setting up flag correctly check the following link
    http://www.mssharepointtips.com/tip.asp?id=1145
    Please 'propose
    as answer' if it helped
    you, also 'vote
    helpful' if you like this
    reply
    Amit Kotha

  • Installing Sharepoint Foundation 2013 for FIM 2010 R2 SP-1

    Hi,
    As SharePoint Foundation 2013 is supported for FIM  2010 R2 sp-1 on windows 2012. I am trying to install the SharePoint  foundation 2013 on windows 2012. There are some prerequisite(like .net framework,windows Identity framework, sync, windows
    appfabric etc) which needs to be get installed before installing SharePoint 2013. I have installed on the prerequisite sucessfully but when try to install the SP 2013, getting the error, windows server AppFabric is not configured properly. Search
    on google and  configured the windows server AppFabric many times still getting the same issue. Kindly suggest if it  mandatory to configure the AppFabric.If yes, please suggest  the correct step to configure the AppFabric. 
    Error Print screen is as below.
    Regards
    Harry    

    Follow these guides to get it working: http://www.harbar.net/articles/fimportal.aspx https://konab.com/using-sharepoint-foundation-2013-with-fim/

  • Sharepoint 2010 Workflow successful: Sharepoint 2013 Workflow UNsuccessful:

    Observation 1 
    1. I created 2 workflows that write "completed" to the workflow history 
    a. 1 workflow uses sp2010 workflow manager 
    b. 1 workflow uses sp2013 workflow manager 
    2. sp2010 workflow works fine; it will start either manually or automatically (when a new item is created ) without issue; "completed' is written to the log as expected. Good. 
    3. sp2013 does not start automatically (when a new item is created ); when trying to start manually I get error message "Something went wrong. To try again, reload the page and then start the workflow." Which I do, but still fails.
    Bad. 
    4.On Workflows.aspx I can see the links to start the 2 workflows manually. 
    a. When I hover over the sp2010 workflow link I can see something that look like this: 
    http://playground/sites/falcontt/_layouts/15/IniWrkflIP.aspx?List={ae95de8e-508b-4aa6-b4b6-490288e35e9f}&ID=53&ItemGuid={697E4218-D889-4FB8-A27B-D188F5D93250}&TemplateID={199c3d86-89a8-4286-b285-37e2d2067b52}&Source=http%3A%2F%2Fplayground%2Fsites%2Ffalcontt%2FLists%2FTrouble%2520Tickets%2Fall%2520requests%2Easpx 
    b. But when I hover over the sp2013 workflow link I can see something that look like this: 
    javascript:StartWorkflow4('949cb889-9b46-4959-9673-842e60cc5a42', '53', '{697E4218-D889-4FB8-A27B-D188F5D93250}') 
    Should this link also look similar to the sp2010 workflow link? If so, do you have any idea why it is different? 
    Observation 2 
    In Sharepoint Designer 2013, when I goto Navigation -> Workflows and click on the 2010 workflow, I see a file listed under "Forms" that looks like this "sp2010 test workflow.xsn". By the way the name of the workflow happens
    to be "sp2010 test workflow". 
    But when I goto Navigation -> Workflows and click on the 2013 workflow, I see a NO file listed under "Forms". Should I see "sp2013 test workflow.xsn" listed there? If yes, can you think of why it is not listed there? 
    I saved the workflow debug logs from Event Viewer but won't share that info here unless necessary, to avoid making things look more complicated than they have to be. 
    Thanks for any comments suggestions, tips, questions, anything, etc. 
    Thanks and have a great weekend. 
    George 

    Hi George,
    First of all, I'd like to clarify that workflow manager is dedicated for SharePoint 2013 workflow platform. SharePoint 2010 workflow is integrated in SharePoint server, while 2013 workflow is based on a new platform named workflow manager server.
    In SharePoint 2013 designer, 2010 workflow has forms while 2013 workflow doesn't have forms.
    For this issue, I suspect there is something incorrect with workflow manager. From the error message "Something went wrong. To try again, reload the page and then start the workflow",  please flush the DNS cache via executing
    IPCONFIG /FLUSHDNS, and restart workflow manager related services such as below, then recreate 2013 workflow to test the issue:
    Service Bus Gateway
    Service Bus Message Broker
    http://blog.houratious.com/2014/05/sharepoint-2013-workflow-something-went.html
    Regards,
    Rebecca Tu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Mass Maintenance will recognize any customer record in workflow process

    Hi gurus,
    Please help me on the Workflow process, how to handle below workflow  scenario,  is there any logic be hand this.
    please see in BOLD workflow issue.
    1.2     As-Is Business Process
    Currently Data Maintenance teams use standard SAP transaction XD07 to change Customer Account Groups. The standard transaction XD07 allows only one Customer Account Group to be changed at a time. The process is to be manually repeated for every customer. After the Account Group is changes in the request client (X07(10)), an RFC call is made to the BOR client (X07(20)) and then to the transaction client  (X08(10)) to change the Customer Account Group as the SAP ALE process does not support Account Group Changesu2026
    1.3     To-Be Business Process
    From time to time, bulk customer data updates will be needed. This can be the result of business situations that cause multiple updates to be performed for given customer fields such as Customer Account Group field. A new program must be developed to let the user mass update the Customer Account Group field (KNA1-KTOKD). The Program should be accessed on demand using a new T.Code (YMDM_ACCTGRP_CHG).
    Business users will submit a spreadsheet in the appropriate upload format to CDM along with written approval from the Food Service data owner to execute the upload in P07. CDM will execute the upload, record all documentation for the audit change log and notify the submitter when complete
    1.4     To-Be Business Process Flow Diagram
    1.5     Enhancement Functionality
    The following are the requirements:
    u2022     This tool will enable a user to perform bulk update to the customer account group field.
    u2022     The utility should let the user upload a u201CTab delimitedu201D file to mass update the Account Group field.
    u2022     The Load File will have 3 columns, Customer Number (KNA1-KUNNR), Current Account Group (KNA1-KTOKD) and New Account Group (KNA1-KTOKD).
    u2022     The Program must utilize the process behind the standard SAP transaction XD07 to change customer Account Groups in X07(10).
    u2022     The standard customer ALE (DEBMAS) process does not support Customer Account Group changes, so the mass change program must use the RFC functionality to change he Account Groups in the BOR (X07(20)) and Transaction system (X08(10)).
    u2022     Workflows for all updates performed using this T.Code are automatically approved.  No manual approval steps will be needed after data load.
    u2022     Mass Maintenance will recognize any customer record that has an open workflow. If a customer record is already in the request queue, it is u201Coff limitsu201D for any bulk update. That update request to that particular customer record must be rejected.
    u2022     Provide the option to run the process in validation mode and update mode.
    u2022     Report all hard and soft legacy field errors on a validation report.  All u201Chardu201D legacy field validations should be passed before allowing update mode to run.
    u2022     The upload process will produce an error log for all records not loaded into the system.

    see newer message. Problem appears to be related to gmail

  • Error has occurred in workflow processing

    Hi All,
    The email notification sent back to employees to notify them that the timecard was submitted successfully is erroring. I looked in the workflow administrator resp and noticed the employee notifications were failing.
    Please see the below error:
    Failed Activity Notifications to Employee (FYI)
    Activity Type Notice
    Error Name WF_ERROR
    Error Message 9004: An error has occurred in workflow processing: 3835: Error '-20002 - ORA-20002: 2018: Unable to generate the notification XML. Caused by: 2323: Message template 'NOTE_EMP' in item type 'WFMAIL' can not be found WF_MAIL.getTemplateName(nid => 882116, n_status => OPEN, n_mstatus => MAIL, t_type => WFMAIL, t_name => NOTE_EMP) WF_MAIL.getTemplateName(882116, OPEN, MAIL, WFMAIL, NOTE_EMP) WF_MAIL.ProcessSignaturePolicy(882116)' encountered during execution of Generate function 'WF_XML.Generate' for event 'oracle.apps.wf.notification.send'.. The stack trace of the error is: WF_MAIL.GetLOBMessage3(882116, WFMAIL, 2323: Message template 'NOTE_EMP' in item type 'WFMAIL' can not be found WF_MAIL.getTemplateName(nid => 882116, n_status => OPEN, n_mstatus => MAIL, t_type => WFMAIL, t_name => NOTE_EMP) WF_MAIL.getTemplateName(882116, OPEN, MAIL, WFMAIL, NOTE_EMP) WF_MAIL.ProcessSignaturePolicy(882116), Step -> Getting Signature policy) WF_XML.GenerateDoc(oracle.apps.wf.notification.send, 882116) WF_XML.Generate(oracle.apps.wf.notification.send, 882116) WF_XML.Generate(oracle.apps.wf.notification.send, 882116) Wf_Event.setMessage(oracle.apps.wf.notification.send, 882116, WF_XML.Generate) Wf_Event.dispatch_internal()
    Can any one help me how to fix this issue?
    Thanks & regards,
    Raju

    Hi,
    You can reset the template in the frontend System Administrator -> OAM -> Workflow -> View Details -> Edit.
    OR
    You can override the template as i mentioned in the prevoius post by including a attribute in the respective message(Refer Workflow Developer's guide for more details).

Maybe you are looking for

  • SRM 7.0 for Public Sector integrated with FM (Budget Control System)

    Hello! I'm starting an implementation project of ERP 6.0 and SRM 7.0 for Public Sector. It would be necesary the integration not only SRM with ERP but with FM (Fund Management), with BCS (Budget Control System) specifically. Is it possible? has anyon

  • Will not allow me back into the program once I close it

    will not reopen once I close the program

  • 2012.04-1 archboot "2k12-R2" ISO hybrid images released

    Hi Arch community, Arch Linux (archboot creation tool) 2012.04-1, "2k12-R2" has been released. To avoid confusion, this is not an official arch linux iso release! Homepage and for more information on archboot: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch

  • Default signature not automatically showing up

    I have three email accounts configured in Mail.app. Each of them has a default signature assigned, so that when I create a new message from that account or reply to a message sent to that account, the signature is automatically attached. However, on

  • Aperture and color calibration

    I use 17" MacBook pro and a 30" Apple display with my Aperture. As there're quite a huge difference in the screen output quality of these two, I'd like a little advice. Do I need to equal out the differences or should I just trust the 30" ? I'm think