Fiscalvariant Issue in 2LIS_03_UM

Hi,
I have instlled 0IC_C03 and everything is in active.But when I am loading UM data
I am getting the issue
Detailed Fiscalvariant not Processed. And in details tab message was as mentione d below.
Error Location: Object Type    TRFN
Error Location: Object Name    07NIX935URU9OYKAUBVUID9VXLB5HB5I
Error Location: Operation Type ROUTINE
Error Location: Operation Name Routine MAP: Rough Posting Per
Error Location: Operation ID   000033 001
Error Severity                 100
Original Record: Segment       0001
Original Record: Number        1
1. I am not able to see Fiscvariant and fiscperiod in the cube leve - i HAVE ADDED and tried to load but the same above issue.
2. There are some routines in Transformation ( Data Source to Inso Source Level ).
3. All routines including fiscalvariant also mapped to BUDAT with some routine.I think this is the issue.
I have routines also there is no syntax error.
i AM GETTING FISCALVARIANT "K4".bUT IT IS NOT THERE in T009B table.
Note :
I have removed the rouines in the following objects level in IS and then loaded data and it successed.
1. 0RT_MTFYVRN
2. 0FISCPER
3. 0RT_QTFPER
4. 0RT_QTFYVRN
5. 0RT_MTFPER
But I wnat to keep as it is and loads should go fine.
How to solve my issue.
Regards
Ramakanth.
Edited by: Ramakanth Deepak Gandepalli on May 14, 2010 2:43 PM
Edited by: Ramakanth Deepak Gandepalli on May 14, 2010 2:55 PM

Hi!
Simple solution to narrow down the error place, will be to put a break point in routine and check where it is showing error. Probably it will related to data as you mentioned in your message.
Thanks
Y

Similar Messages

2LIS_03_UM- Extractor brought incorrect document.

Hi,
I have one issue with 2LIS_03_UM Extraction
In the 2lis_03_um delta extraction we got one document which is not revaluation document but it is available in BSEG and BKPF.
This document is third party invoice document. The document did not update the stock in R/3 System, but it has come in 2lis_03_um extraction .Due to this we are geetting mismatch between R/3 Stock and BW Stock.
can anybady provide reason and solution for thsis?
HREDDY.

Hi,
Thanks for the reply
This is not revaluation document. This is the third party invoice document(there is no material document for this invoice).
I agree with you that the extractor is getting the data from BSEGa and BKPF. But all the accounting documents are not revaluation documents right?. If it is the revaluation document it should aslo update the stock in R/3 system. This is not happening in R/3 system.
I hope that I explained it properly.
HREDDY

2lis_03_um process keys

Hi All,
I am having an issue in 2lis_03_UM. I am finding the difference in stock value for the below process keys. I am not aware of what does these process key revaluation mean. How this is realated to Movement type. I appreciate if some one can explain me the below process keys. I have a positve revaluation and a negative revaluation... what does it really mean.
Process Key                  Description
50                      Other revaluation +
51                      Revaluation/ price change +
52                      Revaluation/inv. verif. +
            AND
150     Other revaluation -
151     Revaluation/price change -
152     Revaluation/ invoice verif. -
Regards,
Aravind

1. Transaction key 51
              Revaluation through a material price change (for example, with transaction MR21) and the debit/credit indicator = DEBIT.
2. Transaction key 151
              Revaluation through a material price change (for example, with transaction MR21) and the debit/credit indicator=CREDIT.
3. Transaction key 52
              Revaluation through invoice verification and the debit/credit indicator = DEBIT.
4. Transaction key 152
              Revaluation through invoice verification and the debit/credit indicator = CREDIT.
5. Transaction key 50
              Revaluations not caused by a material price change or invoice and the debit/credit indicator = DEBIT.
6. Transaction key 150
              Revaluations not caused by a material price change or invoice and the debit/credit indicator = CREDIT
Please read note - Note 492828 - Determining the transaction key for 2LIS_03_BF + 2LIS_03_UM

2lis_03_um setup tables issue

Hi experts,
we have taken downtime to fill the setup tables for inventory.
MCNB - 2lis_03_bx
OLI1BW - 2lis_03_bf
OLIZBW - 2lis_03_um
we have the company codes 1100,1200,1300,2000,2800 at the moment in ECC.
but we will have more company codes coming up in next 2 months.
here my doubt is if we fill the setup tables for the above company codes for material revaluation (OLIZBW), do we need to take downtime again to fill for the upcoming company codes??
OR if u know the upcoming company codes then we can fill the setup tables for those company codes also, even there is no data once the new company codes starts the deltas will be coming into BW, instead of taking downtime again and fill the setup tables for the new company codes?
Please clarify these issues.
Regards
venuscm

Filling setup table wouldn't be required for the upcoming company codes..
Since delta captures new and changed records, the new records for the upcoming company codes will be captured in the delta loads, hence there is no need to fill up setup tables again for the upcoming company codes.
The only thing you have to do this either dont give any selection for company code during initialization or include the upcoming company codes also in the selection if required during initialization.
--- Thanks...

We are facing an issue of Fiscal year varint for 2LIS_03_UM DS

Dear All,
When I am extracting the data for 2LIS_03_UM DS from Quality system ,we are faicng an issue of Fiscal year varint (V3 Type)
I have also transferred the Global settings items in to BI system.
Please let me know something else required from my side.
Regards,
Srinivas Padugula

Go to EXTRAS - DISPLAY GENERATED PROGRAM -
here you will get the program that is generated for the transformation... go the line where the system generated code FILLS the FYV...
It should be something like this
*<<<    Rule ID: '12'.
          IF lssupp-_12 EQ rs_c_false.
            currrule-ruleid = '12'.
      Step ID: '1', Type: 'TIME'.
            currrule-stepid = '1'.
            l_fscvtval = G1-FISCVARNT.
            IF <_ys_SC_1>-CALDAY CO ' 0'.
              CLEAR G1-FISCPER3.
            ELSE.
              l_timvl = <_ys_SC_1>-CALDAY.
Put a break - point there.. then in the DTP go in debug mode.. you will reach the above code... you can simulate the error why its coming
What are the other time parameter you have in your cube?? I think its issue of FVY when you load data to another dependent time character... e.g. 0FISCPER3... FVY defines what value should go in 00FISCPER3... if the FVY is normal.. 0FISCPER3 = 1... if FVY is from April - march... 0FISCPER3 = 4
Edited by: Shailesh Khandarkar on Dec 15, 2010 10:03 AM

2LIS_03_UM Datasource Material belonging to Stock Category 'E' Issue.

Hi,
We wanted to use 2LIS_03_UM Datasource for Sales order Stock Valuation as we want these valuations in Daily level at sales order item level . But we are having a problem in Extracting Materials with Stock Category(BSTTYP) 'E'. I have selected fileds LBWE MBLNR, KDAUF, KDPOS from LBWE pool and brought them to the Extractor . After filling the setup table in OLIZBW with the Company code and posting date. In RSA 3 i am getting data for the company code and posting date. But the Fields BSTAUS and BSTTYP with values 'V" or null. I just came across in one of the forums we have to do some config in
include LMCB1F20 (routine STA_VERAENDERUNG).
And joins on tables MSEG, T156C, T156M
cosidering fields ->
BUSTM, ZUSTD, CNT02, LBBSA, SOBKZ
Can i have some more details on how to do this in R/3.
Thanks

Hi Arun,
Valuated Stock with unrestricted use is a Non - Cumulative key figure and you dont have to add this field to this data source or for that matter to any data source. You can simply include this info object directly in the Inventory Cube and write the Update routine accordingly.
Before writing the routine you must ask your finctional guys to provide you with the classification of the material movements. I mean are there any Z Movements for this key figure? What are the process keys for this? etc...
This will help you in writing the routine for this key figure.
Hope it helps...

Stock Issue/Receipt Values in 0IC_C03 not matchin with MC.9

Hi Experts,
We are facing a certain mismatch problem in our Inventory Cube
(0IC_C03) stock issue and receipt values. They are showing a huge
difference with the issue and receipt values in ECC Report MC.9.
Also please note that the Quantities in the cube are matching exactly
with MC.9 but not values.
On further search , we also noted that the Plant wise Values and
quantities in BW are exactly matching with certain infostructures
(S031, S033) but not with MC.9 in ECC Production.
Can anyone please let us know how can we check the plant wise
issue/Receipt values ?
Also, We replicated the same senario in Quality system and did an
inventory
cube Reload . But it still showed the same discrepencies from MC.9 for the given material and period.
Regards

Dear AL,
There is not failed request and the cube, and the loading is correct.
Also we replicated the same on Quality, and did a complete Reload for the cube and it still gave the same difference.
Kindly let me know how can we check the issue and recept values from PSA of Revaluations Extractor??
Dear Shashank,
We are using standard logistics extractor 2LIS_03_UM for the cube.
Along with 2LIS_03_BX & 2LIS_03_BF.
Regards,
Edited by: BhaminiJ on Aug 3, 2011 1:33 PM

Inventory 0IC_C03 Cube Transformations issue BI 7

Hi Experts,
we are Installing Inventory Cube 0IC_C03, with In dataflow options in BI 7, 2LIS_03_BF transformtions is in Active State, while 2LIS_03_BX transformtion and 2LIS_03_UM transformtions are in Active.
and for most of the Keyfields in Cube are not mapped with infosource fields.
can any body implemented Inventory in BI 7 system, any body faced this issue. can you please share how you resolved this issue.
we are on BI Content 703 11 version.
Regards,
Raj

Raj,
No need to check start routine code for this.
Goto Transformation --> Change mode --> Choose Rule Group (on top of window, middle of the screen) --> Choose 05 --> Dispay mapping --> check routines available or not.
Confirm back are you able to see filed routine or not...!!
Check doc: [Rule Groups in Transformation|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90754b76-bcf1-2a10-3ba7-b299b2be09f2]

Issue with Negative Value for Total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY.

Hi Experts,
we loaded the Cube with datasources 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM.
We mapped the quanity field from 2LIS_03_BF in transformation either into Key figures "Quantity issued from valuated stock" (0ISSVALSTCK) or "Quantity received into valuated stock" (0RECVALSTCK ) of the cube.
For obtaining the Total Valuated stock, we used the Key figure 0VALSTCKQTY. This key figure is having the Inflow and Out flow values as 0RECVALSTCK and 0ISSVALSTCK. When i tried to check the content of 0VALSTCKQTY, the key figure 0VALSTCKQTY is not present in the infoCube content. I understood that the value for this key figure would be calculated at the time of query execution with the formula
{ Last obtained Valuated stock + (Received Valuated Stock u2013 Issued Valuated Stock ) }.
The issue is the first records in the query is obtained with negative value for the total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY even though the values of Received Valuated Stock and Issued Valuated Stock are with Zero. Could any one please help me on how the first record in the query is with a negative value eventhough the inflow and out flow fields of it are with Zero.
Many Thanks in advance.
Jeswanth

Hi Srini,
I observed an interresting reason for the stock being with negative in the first record.
Issue : While executing the BEx report, we have the first record with a negative value.
Let me explain with an example
Material : XYZ
Plant      : A
Date of Stock Initialization for data source 2LIS_03_BX -
> 12th April 2009.
So on 12 Th April 2009 consider that we have a stock in store with a value of 2640.
Then we have loaded wih Data source 2LIS_03_BF for all Historic Movement types.
At the time of query execution we will have the first record with a negative of available stock present on the day of initialization .
So, as we have initilized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th April 2009, we have at that time a stock of 2640 in availability.
Exactly with the same value of 2640, we are having a negative value i.e. -2640.
and also one more point to be noted is ...as we have initialized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th APril 2009...it has created a
opening balance of 2640 on the day of initiailization i.e on 12 th April 2009 in infocube....(which is an extra record...)...so if the previous record of 12,04,2009 is having some value in it..then it will get added to 2640 EA..which will give incorrect stock
So in the query the records will appear in the below following manner
Calendar Day     Total stock                                                                Received stock                                          Issued Stock
28.12.2005 ---> - 2640 EA
29.12.2005 --->    2000 EA                                                                       640 EA                                                        0
10.04.2009 --->      0                                                                                0                                                               2000 EA
11.04.2009 -
>    0                                                                                0                                                                0
                             (For making
                              the earlier record of initilization to 0 a negative value -2640 EA is created in the first record )
12.04.2009 (Initializtion day) ---> 2640 EA                                                 0                                                                0
13.04.2009
the day before initialization the total stock will be 0 due to the negative effect introduced by the first record and from the day of initialization the records will be the accurate values... On 12 th april 2009 we can see that a stock of 2640 is brought into the total stock. In fact if there is no negative value i.e. -2640 in the first record then ...the value on 11.04.2009 will be 2640 Ea and this will get summed up with the Opening balance of 2640 EA created by 2LIS_03_BX on the day of intitialization. So on 12 .04. 2009 the total stock will be shown as 5280 EA...so in order to prevent the double value only we observed that the first record is created with the negative of available stock present on the initialization ...to make the record before the day of initialization i.e. 11.04.2009...to be 0...so that from 12 th April 2009 ..will start to see the actual total stock in the query result...
This is happening only if we use both the data sources 2LIS_03_BX and 2LIS_03_BF for loading into BW.....
If we load alone by 2LIS_03_BF ...then as 2LIS_03_BX is ruled out in the loading...then no negative of available stock will be created ...because there will be bno opening balance created on the day of initialization.....and the opeing balance available will be flowing into consecutive records due to the movement types and 12 th April 2009 will be shown with avaialable total stock of 2640 EA.
Kindly let us know your opinions on this...
Thanks.
regards,
Jeswanth

Prod issue with Inventory management in BW ..please help

hi Folks
i am new into inventory management extraction into BW. i have read all the document regarding the extraction. My question is
1. what all the comon produciton issues you wil come across when you do the inventory management
2. what is the dificlut challenge you face during extraction and validation
3. what all things you need to consider or keep in mind while doing this process
4. what is pros and cons of this process ..any bettar way to improve this process?
please shoot me your thougths ..which will helpfull for my new task..

My Dear Friend...
Typical Steps for refreshing your understanding :
1. Transfer Business Content Datasources 2LIS_03_BX , 2LIS_03_BF, AND 2LIS_03_UM in RSA5.
2. Go to Transaction LBWE, Activate Datasources 2LIS_03_BF, AND 2LIS_03_UM.
3. Go to Transaction MCB_ select SAP BW usage 'Standard' Radio button.
4. Save it.
5. Go to Transaction MCNB, enter name of run Stock_init. Enter Termination date in future. Enter Datasource as 2LIS_03_BX.
6. Execute the initialization.
7. Entries can be found in SETUP Table MC03BFSETUP & MC03BFSETUP.
8. Run SETUP for 2LIS_03_BF, AND 2LIS_03_UM using TCodes OLI1BW and OLIZBW respectively.
ALWAYS LOAD in order as BX datasource first then BF datasource and then UM datasource in cube
9. Run the extraction for 2LIS_03_BX in BW.
10. Compress the request with No Marker Update NOT SET i.e. unticked or unchecked.
11. Run the extraction for 2LIS_03_BF in BW.
12. Compress the request with No Marker Update SET i.e. ticked or checked.
13. Run the extraction for 2LIS_03_UM in BW.
14. Compress the request with No Marker Update SET i.e. ticked or checked.
Steps 1 and 2 shall be executed in Development and transported to production and step 3 onward should be carried out in Production itself with posting Block.
And about Reconcilitation of data ...Count the number of records in R/3 in particular table and check with BW is its matching...When you request in Detail Tab you can find the number of records...
Then check if the balances are matching in R/3 and BW...saying for ex: Check opening Stock for today in both the systems...
If you follow the process properly I dont think you will face any issues...I havent ever seen any complication in Inventory loading...Dont worry...Just follow the typical LO Extraction steps...All Good
Regards...
Sandhya

Process Key in 2LIS_03_UM

Dear Friends,
Please explain me what is Process Key in 2LIS_03_UM Datasource, because we want to define our own Key figure in BW Update rules, s there we need to key some process key,so I need what is this Process key and where we can get it in ECC.
Eg:
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '150'
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '151'
    OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '152' )
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-AC_DOC_TYP EQ 'PR'
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0.
Thanks
Ganga

Hi Ganga,
I am not sure of the new key figure you are going to add in the update rules for 2lIS_03_UM but you may need to add this key figure to your Cube first which should be a non-cumuative and then only you can write any update routines for this new key figure. The following are the process keys we use for Revaluations
The following are for Receipts
050    "Other revaluation +
051    "Revaluation/ price change +
052    "Revaluation/inv. verif. +
These are for Issues
150 "Other revaluation -
151   "Revaluation/price change -
152   "Revaluation/ invoice verif.-
You may also need to mention the Zmovement types in these routines but I am not sure how you are going to get the correct values without the consideration of 0MOVE_TYPE in your routines.
Hope it helps...

Errors occured during extraction - Production issue

Hi Friends,
I have a production issue occured last night and I was hoping, I would get some help around this issue...
Two extractor loads failed last night with short dumps..I see Total column in RSA7 has numbers in it.But when I display the record, it is leading to a short dump.Both extractors are standard extractors.
2LIS_02_SGR and 2LIS_03_UM.I tried with RSA3, it also failed.
MESSAGE_TYPE_X and code SY 097
This is message in the short dump
Module LRSC2U01
Select TID block from STATE table
SELECT * INTO TABLE L_T_STATE
FROM ARFCSSTATE FOR ALL ENTRIES IN L_TH_TID_IDX
WHERE ARFCIPID EQ L_TH_TID_IDX-TID-ARFCIPID
AND ARFCPID EQ L_TH_TID_IDX-TID-ARFCPID
AND ARFCTIME EQ L_TH_TID_IDX-TID-ARFCTIME
AND ARFCTIDCNT EQ L_TH_TID_IDX-TID-ARFCTIDCNT
ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY.
Consistence check
DESCRIBE TABLE L_T_STATE LINES L_LINES.
IF L_LINES NE L_BLOCK_SIZE OR
L_LINES EQ 0.
MESSAGE X097(SY). <=== Error Here
ENDIF.
Thanks
Priya

After debugging the standard extractor's source code, found out that In the internal table of 2LIS_03_UM, an entry was made from 2LIS_02_SGR Extractor and Internal Table for 2LIS_02_SGR extractor, an entry was made from 2LIS_03_UM .
The issue occurred last night because both Transactions were made at the same time and all other primary key fields has same entries and these are the fields the code is executing on.
Basically ARFCSSTATE has duplicate entries on First 4 fields of the table, where as the actual data is only for one record and there is a mismatch while reading internal table which is leading to the short dumps
Ex: In RSA7 has 20 entries and ARFCSSTATE has 21 records( One entry is a duplicate record from the other extractor)
Does anyone encountered this kind of problem before?
Thanks
Priya

Different sequence for ZEILE in 2LIS_03_UM DS after upgrading to ECC 6.0

Hi All,
We are in process of upgrading our ERP system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and we test dataloading into our quality BW system (BW version = 7.0). We have loaded the data from 2LIS_03_UM DS before and after ERP upgrade into the same DSO and have encountered duplicated values for some documents (our key in DSO is based on a combination of MJAHR,MBLNR,ZEILE,BUKRS fields). We've investigated the problem and find out that there are differences in the sequence generation for the ZEILE field.
For example we have a document with 3 items.
Before the ERP upgrade, the data in 2LIS_03_UM DS looks like this:
Material / Item (ZEILE)
A           /              1
B           /        2
C           /        3
After the ERP upgrade, for the same document in 2LIS_03_UM DS we have:
Material / Item (ZEILE)
A            /       3
B            /       2
C           /        1
Have anyone encountered this situation? How you solved it? Of course in case of corrections of historical data in DSO there is always a solution of deleting the data before reloading it. There is another solution?
Thx,
Simona

Hi,
can i know how you rectified this Problem please,
We are getting same issue now..
Thanks
Raj

BW on HANA - Inventory Cube Optimized Cube issue

Hi All,
We have an inventory cube which works perfectly fine and we created a HANA optimized copy of the same cube. We sourced the Initialization from the original (non-HANA) cube, loaded data, and then we loaded the rest of the data from the corresponding DSOs (one for 2LIS_03_BF and one for 2LIS_03_UM).
In order to reconcile them, I opened both of them in BEx Analyzer. The original works perfectly fine, however the HANA optimized one, give me a error when entering the Fiscal Variant:
Error in BW: Time is not consistent.
Error reading the data of InfoProvider
Error while reading data; navigation is possible
I checked in RSDV and the validity dates are fine. When I check in RSRV I get the following errors when running "Test the partitioning column for InfoCube" and the "Consistency of time dimension for InfoCube". The return issues. If I try to repair the issues, I get the same error message.
An exception with the type CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SEMA
Message no. RSRV000
Any clues?

Hi Busy waiting,
Please see if the following notes help you to solve the issue :
1999013 - RSRV - Initial key Figure Units in Fact Tables test results in exception
1953650 - RSRV - Fact tables and dimension tables of InfoCube results in exception error
BR

Unassigned materials in 2LIS_03_UM

When extracting data from R/3 using revaluations data source 2LIS_03_UM, I am getting values for valuated stock without material numbers assigned. The values are mostly negative values. I looked at note 586163 and saw the comment "Unexpected or negative stock values due to FI document summarization: If FI document summarization is activated for the MATNR field, revaluations (2LIS_03_UM) are transferred to BW without a material number. As a result, complete analyses are no longer possible at the material number level. For more information, see notes 36353 and 497992."
I checked and we do have FI summarization on for selected fields, but not MATNR.
We are currently running BW version 6.0 while building the same cubes (0IC_C03) in BI 7.x. I have the data source in R/3 feeding both versions in parallel. The issue does not exist in the old version of BW from the same source system. Not surprising, the problem is more prevalent the farther back in history I go with almost no issue with current month data. I have data loaded from 12/01/2008 to current.
From the source system, the same number of records arrived in the two versions (BW & BI) and the routines in the update rules in the two versions are identical.
I have two other R/3 source systems feeding the new BI into 2 other 0IC_C03 cubes. (no prior BW version) These 2 other cubes also have the problem with unassigned material numbers, so I'm beginning to believe the problem is on the BI side. Is there a configuration setting I'm missing?

Hi Ganga,
I am not sure of the new key figure you are going to add in the update rules for 2lIS_03_UM but you may need to add this key figure to your Cube first which should be a non-cumuative and then only you can write any update routines for this new key figure. The following are the process keys we use for Revaluations
The following are for Receipts
050    "Other revaluation +
051    "Revaluation/ price change +
052    "Revaluation/inv. verif. +
These are for Issues
150 "Other revaluation -
151   "Revaluation/price change -
152   "Revaluation/ invoice verif.-
You may also need to mention the Zmovement types in these routines but I am not sure how you are going to get the correct values without the consideration of 0MOVE_TYPE in your routines.
Hope it helps...

Fiscalvariant Issue in 2LIS_03_UM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for