Floater accrual interest and tax calculation

I have one secutity ID 353022, in security position cash flow as attached, I want to know how accrued interest to pay 36422.22 is calculated, which interest rate it is applied? also how interest deduction inc. reclaim tax 88254.83 is derived?

Hi,
to answer your first question, accrued interest interest to pay (or the Update type 'SE8702') is calculated based on the amount, the coupon rate applicable (in your case 2.1160 if I read it correctly), the period between the last coupon payment date (in your case 15.09.2014) and the current bond purchase date (in your case 16.11.2014) and finally the number of days in a year (depending on the interest rate method applicable).
regarding the second question - I would guess interest deduction inc. reclaim tax or the Update type 'SE3006' is generated as a result of the Flow type '0306' and as the Flow category is 'Other Flow/ Condition', it is just entered manually.
hope this will help you.
Kind regards,
Renatas

Similar Messages

What determines the price and tax calculation for consignment stock?

Hi All,
anyone knows how the price and tax are calculated for consignment stock? in other word, among the info record , contract or material master, what determines the price and the tax calculation for consignment stock?
please advise, your input will be rewarded.
thanks,

First preceeding is taken by contract and then info records of consginment

Customer interface - sales channel, price list and tax calculation

We need to let third party system to upload new customer information into OFS, but I can't see the above 3 fields:
1 sales channel,
2 price list
3 tax calculation
in the interface tables. The interface tables that I am working on are:
ra_customers_interface_all
ra_customer_profiles_int_all
ra_contact_phones_int_all
ra_customer_banks_int_all
ra_cust_pay_method_int_all
is there other interface table that allow us to set the value of above 3 fields?
we are using 11i.
Edited by: shng on Dec 1, 2010 10:43 PM

Are you creating Sales Order with any reference ? In case of ref. , must be User has changed it at Header Level.
Else , it could be due to Authorization Object maintained on that user ID. Kindly coo-rdinate with BASIS Cosultant.
Best Regards,
Ankur

Maintain the acct key and accruals/provisions in the calculation schema

Dear All,
I have a problem during invoice posting.
I create a new freight condition type & assigned it to the calculation schema. I also create a new account key & assigned to the calculation schema in accrual keys. Then done OBYC settings. During MIGO, its working fine. But when i post the Miro against po, giving an error msg., "Maintain the acct key and accruals/provisions in the calculation schema, Message no. M8434"
plz help me to solve this issue.

Have you ticked the 'Acruals' in control data 2 in M/06 for this condition.
Regards,
Piyush

Tax calculation on sales order and invoice is different

2007A, SP0, PL49
The tax on a sales order does not match the tax on the linked delivery and invoice by 1 cent. We take payment based on the sales order amount as the delivery and invoice are done after the fact. Why is the tax calculated differently on the delivery/invoice? We would want it to always match.
Item price = $111.04. Taxcode rate 13% has combination of 5% GST + 8% ONTAX.
On Sales Order, ONTAX = $8.88
On Delivery/Invoice, ONTAX = $8.89
Can someone please explain the difference? Is rounding/tax calcualtion controlled by system settings per document?

Something must be wrong with your Sales Order tax. The actual tax would be 8.8832. Round up to 8.89 is correct. Do you have any SP, FMS or add-on been used?
Thanks,
Gordon

Witholding Tax calculation while payment and advance

Dear experts,
I have few questions as below. It would be great if you can help me out in this :
In vendor master I have two WTH tax codes for invoice and payment and marked as liable.
Incase of invoice (FB60) posting system is calcu;ating correctly and posting, but while posting no popup for to rectify the WTX code also no base amount is populating in WTH tax tab of invoice posting. Is this correct way??
While making payment for the same invoice through F-53, system is again calculating on same open item and no popup, until I go to WTH tax tab and delete the tax amount. What is lacking in my customising of WTH tax code (payment type), to restrict WTH tax calcutaing twice ??
While making advance payment by F-48, system not calculating WTX tax and showing tax code is mandatory, even though tax code (V0-tax exempt) entered, no WTH tax calculation happening. I have checked all Field status of document type and recon account, nothing is mandatory. I dint know why?? Please help in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Abhi

Hi madhu
Thanks for explaining the process it works.
Regarding the error I was facing earlier to enter the tax code in F-48 for the tax category was marked as ' * ' in the advance reconciliation GL. I have removed them and now the error is not coming.
But now for the same or advance payment with F-48, I am not able post the document, though the payment WTX code is showing but not calculating the amount for the same.
The error is
"Withholding tax amount exceeds total bank line item amounts."
Message no. 7Q320
How to post it. Please help.
Regards
Abhi

Input Tax and Output Tax calculating wrong figures

Hi,
I have created Input Tax and Output Tax codes in SAP.
Input Tax- 3%
Output Tax- 4%
All the configuration is done as required. But when I am posting the Purchase and Sales Invoice, the tax amount is not calculating correctly.
For example:
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)
Input Tax Calculation in SAP:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 30000)
The same is happening to Output Tax transactions.
Please advice.

My understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
Correct Entry should be:
Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
Expense A/C............Dr 30000
Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer.

Tax calculation in SRM and passing onto R/3 PO

Hi,
We are on SRM_SERVER 550, SP07 and R/3 4.7 backend.
1. We have a requirement wherein we want the tax determination to happen in SRM. Basically there is no logic for determining the tax codes, but the user himself selects it per line item when creating the cart.
2. We want this to be transferred to the backend PO line item. The tax codes in SRM and R/3 are identical.
Can this be achieved by standard configuration?
I checked that there are 4 choices for tax calculation in SRM
No tax calculation
Tax calculation occurs in backend
Customer specific implementation'
Tax calc occurs via external system
tax calc occurs via TTE
I am not sure which one we should be selecting (currently its no tax calc). I am also not sure if the tax code which is selected in SRM will be passed onto R/3 Or should this be mapped in the BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW Badi?
The option thro development is to provide a custom field where users can enter the tax code/choose from a list and then map it to the tax code(TAX_CODE - MWSKZ) field in badi BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW. But we would prefer to stick to the standard options if they are feasible.
Any pointers to this would be very helpful.
Regards,
Srivatsan

Hi,
If you have a classic scenario where the PO is created in the backend only the standard configurations will work for this.
1) Determine System for Tax Calculation--- R/3 Tax calculation occurs in backend.
Tax calculation occurs in the Backend System
Tax calculation occurs via RFC in the backend system in Financial Accounting. If an external system is connected to the backend system (Vertex or Taxware, for example), this is automatically called from the backend system.
2) Enter tax code :
As you mentioned use the same key and also the description here. Make the zero tax as No tax and make it as default also ( which is safer for all users).
With these two config steps you will get an F4 help in the for all the tax codes defined whereas the system will suggest the zero tax as the default.
The other config steps are optional where you can have tax codes for you product category. Please do configurations in these steps only if required.
This SC tax code will be there in the PO created from SRM provided if you have entry for this in FTXP in the R3 system.
As far as we have configured you dont need BADI for this standard Tax calculations.
If the invoice is made in R3 with reference to this PO then this tax code can be changed.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

Tax calculation in backend and in SRM (classic and standalone scenario)

Hello,
I have an issue regarding calculation of tax. 2 scenarios are used in common: classic and standalone. One node of Organizational structure is using classic scenario, another node is using standalone. So I have 2 Accounting Systems defined (one for each node).
Requirement is:
- For classic scenario, setting the tax calculation in backend
- For standalone scenario, setting the tax calculation to no tax calculation
Problem is that I can not customize the system this way. I do not know any mean to set 2 ways for tax calculation. Would you have any idea to do this?
Thanks,
Patrick

Hi
<b>Please go through this -></b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/f4/8b1d40bb37e569e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Note 848164 SUS3.0: FAQ: Logic of Tax calculation within SUS
958273 FAQ: Taxes in SRM-SUS
999896 EBP tax codes not correctly mapped to back-end tax codes.
908659 Follow-up note for Note 509594
931198 Missing Tax Code in Limit Shopping Cart
430202 Delivery address in shopping cart in BAPIEKPOC
931198 Missing Tax Code in Limit Shopping Cart
881086 Country-specific tax calculation
703292 TAX. Input/Output tax in SAP Supplier Self-Services with TTE
513250 ERS. Tax calculation with the new 3.0 function
390861 Transferring tax table for ERS from backend system
Note 657146 Enhancement for US tax calulation: Functions
510142 EDI-Customizing: Tax code tax-exempted transactions
317040 MR08: Message M8267
49436 MR44: No message if the tax amount is different
Note 84127 Tax Jurisdiction Code for EDI/ALE and Intercompany
Also Try BBP_DET_TAX_BADI.
Regards
- Atul

Tax Calculation in MM and SD

HI
I am little bit confused in Tax Calculation in MM and SD . Please see the scenario below
In my current project in MM side we maintain Base price , discounts and other MM related conditions using MEK1 and for Tax related conditions we use FV11
So we use Pricing Procedure and Tax Procedure
But in SD side , Pricing ,discounts and also taxes related conditions are maintained in VK11 , SD uses all custom conditions for Tax
So my questions are as follows
1- In standard SD - do SAP have Pricing Procedure and Tax Procedure or both can be used within one procedure ?
2- So in MM can we use tax conditions ( Custom tax conditions) in MM calculation schema and determine the taxes ?
3- In MM if we use calculation scheme and tax procedure , then how tax base is determined for tax calculation ?
Thanks and regards
Bhushan

Hi,
In mm we use Pricing Procedure and Tax procedure both.
2- So in MM can we use tax conditions ( Custom tax conditions) in MM calculation schema and determine the taxes ?
Normally you use MM Pricing Procedure for Base price, discount, freight, packaging etc. However for import scenario custom tax conditions like Basic Custom Duty, CVD, Cess, Sec cess is added in MM pricing procedure.
The Tax procedure could be used for excise duties , CST, VAT, service tax.
3- In MM if we use calculation scheme and tax procedure , then how tax base is determined for tax calculation ?
If you check your tax procedure say taxinn you have condition type BASB and routine for base value as 362 through which it calculates base value
Where as in Sd you could use it in one.
Thanks and regards

Calculation procedure TAXINJ and tax key E1 not in table T007A

Hi guys,
While creatig a sales order I am getting the following error:
" Calculation procedure TAXINJ and tax key E1 not in table T007A"
Kindly suggest corrective measures.
Bst regards,
Ashok

Dear ashok
please check for the Tax code assignment which is determined in UTXJ condition.
for the sales order.
and check that tax code is defined as output TAX in FTXP.
for country IN and Tax procedure TAXINJ.
Thanks & regards

How fast does Labview perform integer, float and matrix calculations?

What is the speed of a modern CPU? Ok it is 3Ghz, one to four cores etc. but how much work can I get done in one clock cycle at this speed?
This kind of questions have been in the back of my head for some time, so I decided to test it. Of course using Labview since it so easy to to use!
I wrote a really simple program that performed 10000 adds 3 to an 32 bit integer in a loop. It then repeats this until 1000ms has elapsed and calculates the MegaInts (or whatever I should call it). I then did the same thing by adding 3 to a matrix of 10000 32bit ints.
On and dual core 3Ghz PC from 2005 I got 261 Mints in a loop, and 1400 Mints in matrix. Only one core seems to be used, CPU load aorund 50%. So every two clock cycles or so I get some work done in a matrix calculation. Also older 1,8Ghz Celeron computers performs about the same in this test, even though they feel very slow in normal use.
On a newer 4/8 core 2,8Ghz PC from this year I got 830 Mints in a loop, and 5900 Mints in matrix. Only one core seems to be used, CPU load aorund 12%. So actually more than one add per clock cycle!
This indicates that either the compiler is smarter than me and does not to all integer adds, or the CPU is smart and do them very fast!
See this as not the complete benchmark of Labview in integer, float and matrix calculations, but as a teaser to make you do your own tests.
Play around and have fun!

Norbert_B wrote:
Yamaeda wrote:
A standard loop only runs in 1 thread,[...]
That is not true.
A standard loop follows the clumping algorithm during compilation. Clumps can be distributed on any number of threads.
So, a standard loop CAN be distributed between several threads.
There are, however, some settings and structures which will result in a single thread per loop:
- Setting the calling VI to "subroutine" priority (not recommended)
- Using a Timed Loop instead of a standard one
- AFAIK: Containing the loop in an InPlace Element Structure with "Data Value Reference" border nodes
There is at least one additional option, but it is so unlikely (as it messes up with most of LV!) that i will not point it out here.....
Norbert
Why would we have parallellization options for a loop if it's already multithreaded? I'd love if loops would automatically parallellize.
If you mean the content inside the loop, then it'll follow ordinary optimization and use several threads if possible. In this case OP mentioned 1 cpu was at 100%.
/Y
LabVIEW 8.2 - 2014
"Only dead fish swim downstream" - "My life for Kudos!" - "Dumb people repeat old mistakes - smart ones create new ones."
G# - Free award winning reference based OOP for LV

TAX Calculation in Opportunity

HI,
In my project all the billing related activites happens in SAP ECC. We are not able to calculated tax in Opportunity. Is it possible to calculate tax in opportunity.
If yes help me with steps to configure.
With regards,
Selvam t

Hello,
For tax calculation we would need the destination country information and this information would come from the ship-to party.
In the case of an opportunity, the sold-to party and the ship-to party information is not available as the involved business partner would be a sales prospect (or interested party). Even if we calculate tax at this level, it would only be a tax proposition (as the final sales order could have a different ship-to partner).
During opportunity creation it does not make sense to calculate taxes and so if tax conditions are made mandatory in pricing procedure it will give error.
Now what is the solution ?
For opportunity, a separate pricing procedure without tax calculation should be used and TAX will be anyway calculated during sales order creation.
Best regards,
Maggie

''Prepare interest on arrear calculation''

Dear Sap Gurus,
Under Prepard interest on arrears calculation there are 4 options available 1. open and all cleared items, 2.open items and items cleared with payment, 3.no open items -all cleard items, 4.no open items -only items cleared with a payment. My doubt is When and where we have to use these options. Could you explain with examples.
Thanks in advance
Thanks&Regards,
Periasamy.M

Usuallu we select Open and All Cleared Items
Remaining options purely based on the client interest calculation requirements.

Income Tax Calculation problem: Urgent Help Needed

Dear Gurus,
I am facing a unique problem. Our client has two incentives
1) Product Incentive
2) Sales Incentive
Every month incentive figures get changed. These two are Monthly Regular Income (Cumulations Class 24) i.e. included in annual tax calculation.
Now for tax calculation, my client wants "Actual Earning" and "Estimated Earning for the rest of the year" to be different. But Income tax calculation in SAP (for the month of April 2007) takes Actual Earning and multiplied it by 12( i.e. 11+1) to calculate Estimated Earning. But my client wants this Estimated Earning to be different.
Now please let me know is this possible in SAP system and how to calculate this?
Your help will be highly appreciated
Waiting for an early reply.
Thanking You,
With Best Regards,
Pratik

Hi,
I am not understand your problem give your mb then i talk to you
mhpo

Floater accrual interest and tax calculation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for