Freight condition type Vs. Tax Condition Types

HI,
Can anyone tell me why Freight condition types Post to accruals during MIGO (GR posting) and Tax conditions types don't? Can I provide me a solution to allow Tax condition types to post to accruals during MIGO just like the freight.
Thanks.
Rickey.

Hi James,
This freight condition type assigned to freight Vendor in creation of PO.During Creation of PO ,select Condition type and go to details and assign your freight Vendor.
If helpful then reward.
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                   Material          Outgoing Target val
Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020    MAT2               150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR
                        MAterial       Outgoing target val
Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020         MAT2              0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

Condition Records For Tax Condition types for SAP 4.7

Dear Experts,
What is the procedure to maintain condition records for tax condition types like CST , VAT and Service Tax. We are not using CIN. In MM01 and XD02 tax classifications i have maintained UTXJ condition Type and also maintained the above mention tax condition types.. But when i create condition records for UTXJ in VK11 the sysytem is asking for Tax code. In FTXP when i defined Tax code A1 for Tax ProcedureTAXIN1 where i maintained all the Tax condition types there.But i am unable to save the Tax % in FTXP.When i try to save the tax code it is not saving.
Is there any other procedure to maintain Tax condition types for SAP4.7.
My Pricing procedure that i maintained in V/08 is Z00001.
Regards
Jyoti

Hi Jyoti
Since you are not using CIN, you can do the follwing for tax conditions
Check the assignment of the TAx procedure to country
once u do this , you will be able to maintin the vendor and customer records for MWST type for taxes
then create condition records for MWSt with access sequence MWST in condiution type or design one suited to your needs
alternatevely in the current procedure you can change access sequence for condition type UTXJ form the current one to MWST and then maintain condition records
hope this helps
thanks
Akasha

Sales Order Unable to Use New Condition Tables for Tax Condition Type

Dear All,
I am currently working on SAP R/3 4.0. I have a new requirement for my tax where I need to create new condition tables other than the 4 standard SAP tables which are Customer/Material, Division/Customer, Departure Country/Destination Country, Domestic Taxes and Export Taxes. My new tables consists of Departure Country/Destination Country/Shipping Point/Tax Code. The requirement is that the tax code is based on the chosen destination country and shipping point. The problem I am facing now is that no matter what types of table I create or even I generate with reference to the standard table, the access sequence will only refer to the 4 standard SAP tables above. Even if I put my own table in the highest priority for the access sequence, the same thing happens. My sales order will only pick up date from the standard table.
I wonder if anyone encountered the same problem as me.
Kindly advise.
Thank you.
Regards,
Yvonne

Hi
Yvonne
I suggest fist check a simple thing ,whether u have successfully determined shipping point for each line item ,it is possible that just adding a line item will not trigger shipping point determination . So after u update the shipping point on line level u can rerun pricing and check agian if u r getting it .
Secondly for tax purposes I suggest Try to have Customer and material tax classification approach this allows to u have long term flexibiliy and also reduces your maintenance activity . As if u change or add number of shipping points and business changes using the sequence of shipping point ,the logic of just using shipping point will not work.
In Tax classification u cna add new condition table for each new tax category and use it in different access sequences.
This information can be passed on to FI using Different Tax code for Different combination.
I hope this helps
Regards
Mandar

Adding the tax condition type after customer pays

Hi,
I have a strange situation.
The customer has payed the invoice amount and evrything is cleared and the complete Order to Cash cycle is complete.
Now my client wants to charge the customer with the tax amount (implemented later) on the invoice that is already been cleared.And that amount should as usual go to the tax G/L account. There are not many Condiiton types but just the base price condition type and tax condition type.
I have maintained a necessary condition record for MWST.
SAP transaction wise I am thinking to create a normal sales order of the invoice amount (Base + Tax condition type) and then complete the order to cash cycle.And once it is completed I would create a debit memo request and subsequent debit memo for the base price which would be adjusted later.
This will solve my basic purpose of Tax amount goin to the tax account.
This is only for few SO in the production
Please let me know in case anyone has a better idea.

Hi ronaldo
You create a sales order with document type L2 ( debit process) . so you create the sales order with reference to billing . Now manually you enter the tax condition type (MWST) at the sales order level and then do billing.Make sure that in the tax condition type details you have maintained the option C "Manual entries are possible" .So that you can enter the the tax condition type manually at the sales order level.
So some additional taxes are being charged to the payer.So he will be paying some extra taxes as he has already paid for the billing document that has been passed to FI
Regards
Srinath

Condition value of Tax gets wrongly added to Total value of Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this. When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header = 700.00 EUR
Material Outgoing Target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header = 550.00 EUR
MAterial Outgoing target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.

Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba

Tax Condition

Hi,
I do not want to use Tax Procedure TAXINJ or TAXINN as in this implementation there is no Cenvat, no maintenance of any excise related data, registers etc, etc
Only requirement is in PO we are able to capture various taxes like excise duty, cess on duties, sale tax, LST, etc. what vendor charges to us.
Shall we create directly Tax conditions in PO pricing procedure without using any of TAXINJ or TAXINN? Is it feasible? Any impact?
Can I create conditions with the following
Condition class D (Taxes)
Calculation Type A (Percentage)
Condition category D (Tax)
What shall be the access sequence if any in these conditions?
PO pricing procedure will have condition NAVS and NAVM as conditions or not?
Regards

Hi,
If your not going to use CIN module then not to worry about TAXINN or TAXINJ. This comes only under CIN module.
Standard Pricing procedure will take care of your conditions.
For Tax codes you can use FTXP to create. VAT Taxes amount you can get Set off. Regardsing set off you can check with your FI consultant.
Regards
Give points if useful

Vendor Field not available for Tax Condition

Hello Gurus
We have created a new pricing condition type to capture the Taxes
Condition Class: A( Taxes)
Calculation Type : A (Percentage)
Cond Category: D(Tax)
When i used this condition in PO and select the details of the conditions i can't find the field (vendor-lifnr) in the condition type at all.
When i checked the same for Frieght ( FRB1) in the condition type detials i can see the vendor which i can even change.\
Is it not possble to have vendor field when i have taxes condition class? If not how can i bring this into my condition type details screen
regards
mohammed

Thanks for you speedy reply ,
We wanted to post this TAX condition to a different vendor than the vendor of the PO. in my condition i did not see the field VENDOR, how can i get this feild VENDOR in this condition details.
Regard
Mohammed

Condition types in Taxes, MM and SD

Hi Experts,
There are different kinds of condition types For Taxes( t.code obq1), MM (m/06) and SD( v/06). how are these condition types are useful. please explain the difference among these condition types.
Regards,
babu

Hi Babu,
         Vendor purchasing price is made up of with differenct pricing elements. Ex . Material basic prices , freight charges , discount etc. To reprsent each element different condition types are used in MM pricing procedure.
         In the similar manner for Finishe goods selling prices is made up of diffeent price elements. Ex. Finished goods basic price , frieght charges, discoutn etc , To reprsent each element different condition types are used in SD pricing procedure.
          The total tax amont also is made up of with diffrent tax elements or different taxes are there. Ex input tax , out put tax , basic tax , surcharge , education cess etc. To represent these taxes various condition types are used in Tax procedure..
Hope its clear........
Regds
Chandra

Error message FF762 " Condition type MWVS tax code A8 does not extist- MIRO

Dear all,
after support packagesi mplemented , I've the problem with transaction MIRO,
because I cannot released the invoic for the folloqiong error:
FF762 " Condition type MWVS tax code A8 does not extist.
Please, could you help me.
Thanks in advance for your cooperation
Gaetano

Hi,
Go to FTXP and give the tax code A8.
In the resultant screen, select the condition type MWVS, and link the condition type to an account key.
Make sure all the other tax determination settings are fine
Now, try the transaction it should work fine.
Hope this helps you

Condition type MWST tax code A1 does not exist

Hi all,
I'm facing the problem while I'm releasing Billing doc to Accounting. This is the error
Condition type MWST tax code A1 does not exist
Message no. FF762
Diagnosis
When calculating tax, the system tried to determine the condition amount and the condition number from tables A003 and A053 using the specified condition type and tax code. However, no values were found there.
System Response
The specified amount cannot be posted in FI.
Procedure
Check the Customizing settings for the specified tax code. Check whether the validity period (possible with tax jurisdictions) is defined.
I have already checked FTXP, and the Tax Code is already there.
I have already checked the condition record, and it is already there,
Maybe I have missed something...?
Thanks before for all your help
Regards,
Rizki Harris

Hi Typewriter,
1. Check in a previously created invoice, accounting document - the tax code? (FB03) is it A1?
   --> the tax code is A1
2. In VK12, MWST do you have other values of % tax (e.g. 0%). In a sales order, give appropriate Tax classification values for CMR, MMR so that MWST value = 0. Create invoice and check if you are getting the message
   --> in VK12 for Key Combination Domestic Taxes :
        TaxCl1Cust   TaxCl.Mat     Name                                 Amount     Valid from    Valid To         Tax Code
        0                    1                  Tax Exempt Full Tax                          25.07.2011   31.12.9999    A0
        1                    0                  Liable For Taxe No Tax                        01.01.2008   31.12.9999    A1
        1                    1                  Liable forTaxeFull Tax              10       25.07.2008 31.12.9999    A1
     --> I still don't understand what do you mean by CMR, MMR ?
3. Condition type MWST is not allowed to be processed manually..
Regards,
Rizki Harris

In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron

Hi
In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code should not be FF because tax code FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
Please help me.
Rajendra Prasad

Dear Rajendra,
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
-->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
-->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
-->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Tax condition types issue in sales order

Hi Friends,
I am bit lost with the following issue. I have searched sdn and other SAP forums for this. There were similar issues discussed but they didnu2019t solve my issue. There was exactly similar issue but it was unanswered. So I am posting the issue here to get some inputs.
This is the Indian tax scenario. I have configured pricing procedure where I have JVAT and JCST. If the company is selling to customer in the same state where company is located letu2019s say region 05 JCST 2% applicable. If the customer is outside region 05 then 5% JVAT should applicable.
=> In the pricing procedure it was like
150 0 JVAT
160 0 JCST
Both will be calculate on the gross value.
=> I have created two new tax classifications for customer master.
JCST   2   Tax liable outside region 05
JVAT 3    Tax liable inside region 05
So in the customer master I have both JCST and JVAT. I have created a customer with region 05 and in customer master under Billing document tab I have entries like below
Country    Name   Tax Category   Name   Tax classification Description
IN              India        JCST                IN: CST              2                  Tax liable outside region 05
IN              India        JVAT               IN: VAT              0                  Tax Exempt
=> I have created condition record for JCST with the following key combination
Country u2013 IN
Region of dlv. Plant u2013 05
Region u2013 05
TaxClass1-Cust. -- 2
TaxCl.Mat u2013 1
Amount u2013 2 percentage
Tax code u2013 A1 (TAXINN A1 2% Output tax)
=> With the above condition records maintained for JCST and maintaining tax classification as 2 for JCST and 0 for JVAT, I assume in Sales order SAP should calculate tax JCST 2 percentage. But in sales order SAP is not considering JCST and JVAT. For JVAT it makes sense as it does not have condition records. But I didnu2019t get the reason for not getting JCST. When I checked analysis and click on JCST condition type it says condition record is missing. Surprisingly when I click on the access details it shows u201CTaxClass1-Cust. as 0u201D it didnu2019t show as 2 as maintained in the customer master.
When I change the Tax classification for JVAT from 0 to 1 or from 0 to 3 in the customer master, in the analysis when I click on access details for JCST it shows tax classification maintained for JVAT that is as 1 or 3 so it seems SAP is not considering JCST in customer master at all. Why is that so?
The access (condition table) for JCST and JVAT are same.
Any inputs?

Hai SAP_2006,
We are also having similar requirement and inform the USER to maintain
In our customer master we gave like
Customer master:
Sales area data
Billing documents
JTX1     Tax Jurisdict.Code d     1     Full Tax 12.5%
JTX2     Tax Jurisdict.Code d     1     Full Tax 12.5%
JTX3     Tax Jurisdict.Code d     1     Full Tax 12.5%
JTX4     Tax Jurisdict.Code d     1     Full Tax 12.5%
To get LST we maintain
Country u2013 IN
Region of dlv. Plant u2013 05
Region u2013 05
TaxClass1-Cust. -- 1
TaxCl.Mat u2013 1
Amount u2013 12.5 percentage
Tax code u2013 A2 (TAXINN A1 12.5% Output tax)
To get CST
Country u2013 IN
Region of dlv. Plant u2013 05
Region u2013 06
TaxClass1-Cust. -- 1
TaxCl.Mat u2013 1
Amount u2013 12.5 percentage
Tax code u2013 A2 (TAXINN A2 12.5% Output tax)
In case if they want CST 2%, then user has to go
Sales order header Biiling
Alt tax Classification : Shouls change the Blank to 2 in the 1 box out of 4.
for that we maintained condition record as
Country u2013 IN
Region of dlv. Plant u2013 05
Region u2013 06
TaxClass1-Cust. -- 2
TaxCl.Mat u2013 1
Amount u2013 12.5 percentage
Tax code u2013 A3 (TAXINN A3 2% Output tax)
This doesn't require to change customer master regularly and default system finds LST or CST 12.5 unless they change to 2% system will not change automatic. So CST 2% Vs CSTfull tax risk is also avoided.
Regards,
Mani

New condition type, new tax codes

Hi,
I have created new condition type for tax procedure TAXIN. I have defined the account key for it. The condition type is basically for exempted input tax transaction. Then I created new tax codes by using the new condition type. The percentage of the tax codes is 0 as it is exempted.
When I am trying to post invoice by using above taxcodes, it gives me error that the tax code is not defined in taxprocedure TAXIN.
What could be the reason?

Did you create the tax code in the development or prouction system?
If in development you need to export the tax code by going to FTXP and selecting Tax Code -> Transport -> Export. Then when you release the transport you should go to the Production system and select Tax Code -> Transport -> Import.

Po tax - condition types defined sequence

Hi Friends,
we have v1 tax code defined for purchase order . There are five conditions typs in the tax code. I have to write some code for each condition type. for this I want to get these condition types in a sequence it is defined in the tax defination.
From where I will get the sequence for condition types.
pankaj

Hi ANJI,
For tax code follow records are there in A003
Condition type Country Tax Code Cond.recor
JA1I            IN      v1       0000030596
JEC2           IN      v1       0000030597
JIP7            IN      v1       0000030599
JMO2          IN      v1       0000030598
where as actual seq. is
JMO2
JEC2
JA1I
JIP7
Pankaj

Freight condition type Vs. Tax Condition Types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for