Fund & Gl Account Assignement

I have created a Fund in FM5I but I don'yt know where to attach a Fund Centre to a GL Account.
Can some one help me
Kiran

Dear Kiran,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_pserv464/helpdata/EN/b9/3ea582417c11d189400000e829fbbd/content.htm
Having created your commitment item hierarchy, you must then define account assignment items in the G/L accounts, which are relevant to the automatic account assignment derivation from the G/L account.
Prerequisites
A prerequisite is that you have first flagged the Commitment item field as an optional entry in Customizing for Financial Accounting by choosing Define screen format per account group (G/L accounts).
To ensure that data is correctly recorded and that commitment/actual values are correctly analyzed in the information system, it is essential that you define the correct control parameters for account assignment items in G/L accounts. If you do not, the values may be wrongly posted and displayed.
Activities
If you post to a particular G/L account, the posting is simultaneously recorded in the commitment item stored in it. The control parameters determine how and where the values are recorded in Funds Management.
When you enter a posting, the system proposes the commitment item from the G/L account for that line item. In accordance with the settings entered in Customizing, this recommendation value can be transferred or overwritten with another commitment item.
The financial transaction and item category are automatically taken over from the line item when you post.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Naveen.

Similar Messages

  • Consuming document with different account assignment from Earmarked Funds

    Hi,
    We have implemented Public Sector FM functionality in version ECC 6.0 and we are using Earmarked Funds (Funds Reservation).
    The system is allowing to post consuming documents with different account assignment from that in the
    Funds reservation document nevertheless we donu2019t have set the indicator 'Acct.asst.changeable' in the Funds Reservation document.
    I don't need the fields Fund Center and Commitment Item to be transfered from earmarked funds document (Define Rules for Account Assignment Transfer). Instead, if consuming document have a different account assignment, the user should get the error message no. RE603 'Account assignment differs from document XX 001'.
    In version 4.6C it worked this way. In our case the Fund Center is delivered from Cost Center and Commitment Item is delivered from Cost Element (SAP - Derivation Strategy for FM Object Assignment).
    I hope someone can help me.
    Thanks in advance,
    Rodrigo

    Hi,
    You get the error message RE603 when you make the settings below:
    1. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Account assignment transfer > Define rules for account assignment transfer; you flag the 'Active' boxes for account assignment (sort of conterintuitive).
    2. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Change message control; change RE603 to 'E'.
    3. In Earmarked fund document, flag the 'Acct.asst. changeable' box (totally conterintuitive).
    Please give it a try and let us know the outcome.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • How to activate FM Account assignment in Sales Order

    Dear All,
    How to activate FM Account assignment in Sales Order at item level in account assignment category.
    Plz provide some solution for the same.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Pankaj

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I am not asking of account assignment group for material.
    My problem is when i am creating Sales Order at item level in Account assignment category there is one field for Fund Mangement account assignment grp.
    I want to activate this field and i have to enter FM area in that field.
    Plz send some solution for the same.
    Thanks & regards,
    Pankaj

  • PO Account Assignment Fund Change is not transferred to backend

    We are on SRM 550 SP10 ECS.
    When a PO is being changed, if the fund is changed, that change does not get transferred to R/3. The old Fund when the PO was created is retained on the R/3 side. On the SRM side the new fund is retained.
    Note:
       The fund that I am talking about is under the Account Assignment link of Item data. If the Cost center is changed the new cost center is reflected to the backend.

    Hi KA!
    Have you found a solution to your problem? We have the same problem and is looking for the FM to get the fund center and commitment item from back end.
    Sincerely
    Anders

  • Funded Program in ME21N with Account Assignment Category equal BLANK

    Hi
    I am doing one ME21N (create purchase order) with Account Assignment Category equal BLANK " ". In u201Caccount  assignmentu201D the system only allow to fill the fields u201Cfunds centeru201D, and   the u201Ccommitment itemu201D but as the purchase is to INVESTMENT I need to fill the field FUNDED PROGRAM too. I haven´t internal order (CO) and project (wbs element) to do one derivation in this point of process (these objects will be create during the business process).  I have already tried to use the fields of FMDERIVE´s trace but unfortunately any combination help me to define the Funded Program.
    thanks,
    Claudio

    Hi Claudio,
    I want also to share with you some information about Funded Programs.
    Funded programs are used mainly as FM account assignment elements, in the same way as funds, funds centers, commitment items, and functional areas are. Budget can be entered for them and monitored in them.
    You can enter the funded program directly in budgeting, but when you are using the funded program in integrated postings, it is not possible to enter the funded program directly. This is the system design.
    The funded program uses much of the functionality of the Business Data Toolset (BDT). If you want to customize the funded program master data, you should be familiar with the BDT.
    The use of funded program as part of FM account assignment for budgeting, can cause performance issues (posting and reports).
    SAP recommends that:
    a. Funded Program must be derived using rules specified in the FM derivation tool (FMDERIVE);
    b. While you can use any operative element as the source for deriving funded programs, we strongly recommend that you use only WBS elements, orders, or networks.
    For additional information, check SAP help in the following link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/74/35160eea86034aa4166151005e1a93/frameset.htm
    For BDT information, check the following help: http://help.sap.
    com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/78/7c543ac368906ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • PM Error Message " FM Account assignment is incomplete (Funds center) messa

    Dear PM Experts.
    We use PM module for both Preventive maintenance and Breakdown maintenace.
    While creating an breakdown maintenance order, the system gives me an error message: " FM Account assignment is incomplete (Funds center), error  message number FI135";
    As a result i cant release the order for further processing.
    Kindly help me to resolve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Richard.

    Hi
    Try below it may solve your problem .
    1. Go To Change Order  (IW32)
    2. form the Menu Path --- GOTO -- Assignments -- Fund Management
    3. Either your Fund center field will be blank there or the Fund Center available there is no more Valid now .
    4. Get the correct Fund Center from commercial & Enter there --- Save the Order & Release it .
    Regards
    Sameer

  • Value Blank/space is invalid for account assignment element fund

    Hello!
    I created an invoice with several items linked to funds reservation.
    when the invoice has 2 line items, the payment run is executed without problem.
    when the invoice has more than 3 line items, the payment run is executed with error.
    The message error (message number F6804) is "value blank/space is invalid for account assignment element fund".
    I dont know where i should enter a valid value for fund.
    Thanks for your kind help!
    Chiachen

    Hi Chiachen,
    The problem occurred because the functional area is not inherited from the Purchase order during MIRO posting. As a result, error message F6841 is issued.
    There are 2 main programs for the FM derivation:
    1. Function Module FM_DERIVE_ACCOUNT_FROM_COBL
    2. Program LFMCOBLF06
    The latest notes which affects these 2 programs are 1244381 and 1247982.
    Kindly implement these notes using SNOTE.
    During this process, it should also bring in all the other pre-requisite notes. Do not worry if the
    symptoms described in the notes do not match yours. What's more important is to bring the coding in your system up to date. Please retest MIRO after the notes are applied. Let me know the results.
    Check also the notes 17941 and 982511.
    I hope it helps
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • ME31L: Pop up of Funds-Account Assignment during ME31L

    Hello,
    At the time of creation of Scheduling agreement, we are getting pop-up to maintain *Funds-Account Assignment *.
    With the same material, vendor, plant, purchasing organisation combination we do not get this pop-up at the time of ME21N.
    What might be the reason for pop-up during ME31L?
    We do not want this pop-up in ME31L.

    Thanks Priyanka.
    We are not entering the amount manually in ME21N and in ME31L.
    System is getting the price from info records.
    We are not getting this pop-up during ME21n.
    We are getting this pop-up only durinh ME31L and ME31K.
    One more thing, we want to share.
    We are currently upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
    In 4.7 we do not get this kind of pop-up in Me31L but in Ecc 6.0 we get this pop-up for ME31L.

  • Derivation of Account Assignment Reference using Fund

    I am trying to derive account assignment reference using “Fund” as source field. I have created the account assignment derivation rule (Tcode – TPM30) using following condition and Values
    Source Field
    Company code
    Product type
    Fund – Not able to see as Source field after activation of FIN_TRM_PSM_INTEGRATION business switch
    Target Field
    Account Assignment Reference (AA_REF)
    Condition
    Product Type = 410

    Hi there
    You can only use the Derivation Types which are selectable. You cannot create your own ones such as "fund". In this case, if accounting entries are different you have to create a new product type called "funds".
    Regards
    Juerg Heiz
    [email protected]

  • Funds Management  - Wrong Account Assignment getting cleared in PR

    Hi All,
    We are working on Funds Management implementation at our workplace and we are facing a problem relating to account assignment. (SAP ECC 6.0)
    We have defined a Account Assignment Derivation for a material as
    Material Number = A100 assigned to Commitment Item = ComItem1 and Funds Center = FunCen1.
    Now during the creation of a PR for A100, where the Funds Center and Commitment Item fields are mandatory, the wrong commitment item is automatically getting populated (ComItem2 that was defined under a different Funds Center, instead of ComItem1 ;but the fund center field in the PR is alright) and they are also getting passed right up to the MIRO stage, where I get the message "No Commitment Item entered in Item" (here too the wrong funds center and commitment item from the PR are getting populated automatically)
    What's worse is that the budget document contains the new commitment item ComItem2 created under FunCen1.
    I am not clear as to where the assignment to the funds center and the commitment item in the PR happens - and given that the assignment is given as required, how are the wrong values getting populated and then allowed to proceed upto MIRO ?
    Regards,
    Wy

    Hi Eli Klovsky,
    Thanks for the suggestion - was helpful to find out the target fields through the trace.
    We went to the details column for the target field in the rule definition structure, and activated the "Overwrite with New Value" field, and in this case, the new values of fund center and commitment item are getting over-written.
    However, one problem I have faced is that for materials which have no assignments, when we create the PR on the same line as that of the previous PR (By changing the material number), the old values are not getting replaced. They are however getting replaced once we come back and create a new PR, or add the material on another line.
    Have to explore this better - there might be some human errors, where the material number is changed on the same line as that of the previous material PR, in which case, the existence of the previous commitment item and fund centers can result in wrong allocations to other divisions..
    @All,
    Really sorry to be continuing this discussion here, is it possible to move this to the appropriate Public Sector group  ?

  • FM Account Assignment is incomplete (Funds Center)

    Dear all,
    We are upgrading from 4.6C to 6.0, when i am post invoice to accounts it shows the message FM Account Assignment is Incomplete (Funds Center). I think in order i have to enter Fund Center but in order it dosenot enter me the funds center at item level in Account assignment category.
    Can any one please give some solution for the same.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Pankaj

    Dear Pankaj
    Reproducing the extract taken from "Funds Management" of SAP which I though would be helpful to you
    If the system can determine an FM account assignment from the FM-CO assignment table, this appears as the default value.
    If the sytem cannot determine an FM account assignment, you must enter one by choosing Assignments -> Funds Management.
    The FM account assignments that you have to enter depends on the field control.  You should choose this in a such a way that you have to enter the funds center and, if required the fund.
    Owing to the account assignment logic applying in Funds Management, the system can derive the commitment automatically in the subsequent postings - for example, from the G/L Account or Cost element.  If the commitment item is derived from the cost element, you should ensure that the same commitment item is assigned to the primary cost elements and to the settlement cost elements.
    As long as the FM account assignment in a network/network activity is not complete according to the field control, the order status HMKU (FM account assignment incomplete) is active.  This status prevents automatic generation of purchase requisitions for components and services procured externally as well as releasing the order.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • PO Account Assignment Tab in ECC - with Split Accounting

    Hello,
    We currently are using Funds and WBS Elements within our SAP system.  When both a fund and a WBS Element are used on one line item within the shopping cart, I am able to see all of the information (fund, wbs element, fund center, cost center, commitment item, etc).  However, after the purchase order is created and transmitted to ECC the "Account Assignment Category" is marked as "X - All aux.acct.assgts." and the account assignment tab only has the following column headers:
    - Sequential Number of Account Assignment
    - Quantity
    - Distribution Percentage in Case of Multiple Account Assgt
    - Cost Center
    - G/L Account Number
    - Order Number
    - Asset Subnumber
    - WBS Element
    - Sales and Distribution Document Number
    - Sales Document Number
    - Delivery Schedule Line Number
    - Unloading Point
    - Goods Recipient/Ship-to Party
    - Deletion Indicator: Purchasing Document Account Assignment
    I can see that the fund is within the EKKN table (Field: BP_GEBER) but for some reason ME23N does not have this field in the Account Assignment tab when the category is "X".  How do I add "Fund" into the Account Assignment tab so that it will be visible within ME23N?
    Thanks,
    Katie

    IMG \ MM \ Purchasing \ Account Assignment \ Maintain Account Assignment Categories
    Select details for AAC 'X' and view field settings below.  Set Funds \ Funds Center to required setting e.g. Display.

  • PO Group/Split by Account Assignment

    Is there a possibility to split/group Purchase Orders that would be created directly from the 'Process Purchase Order' transaction? I thought of using the Group_Local_PO BADi, but it would be called only while creating Purchase Orders from the sourcing cockpit.
    We would like to group/split POs based on the fund and/or some account assignment fields of the line items.
    I could achieve this while PO creation from the sourcing cockpit, but not sure how to handle the automatic PO creation and direct PO creation. Your help is much expected and appreciated. We are on SRM 5.
    Thanks,
    - J

    Hello Jack,
    Jack Lancelot wrote:
    I've implemented exactly the same logic that you had mentioned for PO creation from sourcing cockpit.
    Will this take care of splitting the Shopping cart if POs are to be created against a relevant contract?
    fields AGREEMENT and AGMT_ITEM from Importing parameter ITEM_DATA should answer to your need.
    Splitting criteria are defined in Class Interface CL_BBP_SC_TRANSFER:
    - for local PO, in method SPLIT_PO_LOC_MAP_CRITERIA,
    - for backend PO, in method SPLIT_PO_BE_MAP_CRITERIA.
    Jack Lancelot wrote:
    And for direct PO creation, I have created a validation in Doc Check & save BADi s to give an error message if multiple funds are found. But, I'm not sure if the users would like it.
    Is there a way that I could manipulate this process using the 'Create PO' function module or by any other means?
    I'm weighing the effort that would be required for a custom work around solution.
    Don't know: make your own tests.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • What is the importance of word account in 'Account' assignment elements

    Automatic 'account assignment derivation' minimizes the manual effort of entering postings in which the 'account assignment elements' can be entered. The values derived appear as default values that you can overwrite if you wish.
    FM account assignment elements, Derivation of FM Account Assignment Elements from CO Acct Assgnmnts.
    These are many place where word account assignment elements is used in sap.
    what is the importance of word 'Account'. What should we understand if word 'account' assignment element wording is used in FM,CO or FI.

    i have tried but no one answers specific question -- What is 'account assignment element'.
    its used everywhere as if everyone understands it in every module.
    for e.g
    FM account assignment elements are not migrated to BCS. Nevertheless, they are crucial to proper migration, since budget data is assigned to these account assignment elements. You have the following options:
    ·  If you do not want use new FM account assignment elements in BCS, you should proceed as follows:
    Migration at fiscal year-end: no specific action is required. See link below.
    Migration during the course of a fiscal year: you should carry out the activation of account assignments for BCS and optionally also define your budget structure.
    ·  If you want to use new FM account assignment elements in BCS, such as the grant or funded program, proceed as follows:
    Now if someone is new to SAP what would he understand with word - FM account assignment elements
    Like in FI we have GL account and in FM we have Commitment item. Two different nomenclature. Why account assignment element is used freely as If everyone else understands it, I would love to understand that how to interpret word account assignment element differently if used in different module.

  • No Account Assignment when I created Planned Order to Purchase Requisition

    Hi ,
    No Account Assignment when I created Planned Order to Purchase Requisition from Funds Management , where as If i change  ( eq : PR item qty is 10 , i just changed to 0 , enter then replace back that 10 ) any thing in the PR , Account Assingment is populated and list of accountin  documents are attached to PR.
    Please suggest me , what might be the problem .
    Thanks in adv

    Hi,
    a) When you convert the PldOrd into PurReq it disappears from table PLAF, it ceases to exist. There will be no PldOrd-reference in PurReq (you will not find such field in EBAN). (if you check field RSNUM in PLAF before converting the PldOrd and you check field RSNUM in EBAN after converting the PldOrd into PurReq, you wlll find the same number)
    b) It's not easy to say. You can check PLAF-PSTMP and PLAF-PUSER and compare these with data you get from trx STAD. But this is also not an exact methode since these field are in connection with the last date of change.
    Firming indicator cannot help also since you can remove it manually... - even though the PldOrd was changed manually, no firming indicator will be seen...
    (Of course, generally firming indicator helps if the user doesn't remove it intenionally)
    Regards,
    Csaba

Maybe you are looking for