ME31L: Pop up of Funds-Account Assignment during ME31L

Hello,
At the time of creation of Scheduling agreement, we are getting pop-up to maintain *Funds-Account Assignment *.
With the same material, vendor, plant, purchasing organisation combination we do not get this pop-up at the time of ME21N.
What might be the reason for pop-up during ME31L?
We do not want this pop-up in ME31L.

Thanks Priyanka.
We are not entering the amount manually in ME21N and in ME31L.
System is getting the price from info records.
We are not getting this pop-up during ME21n.
We are getting this pop-up only durinh ME31L and ME31K.
One more thing, we want to share.
We are currently upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
In 4.7 we do not get this kind of pop-up in Me31L but in Ecc 6.0 we get this pop-up for ME31L.

Similar Messages

  • Changes in Purchasing Document Account Assignment during Goods Receipt

    Hi MM Gurus,
    Good day!
    I just wanted to check with you on something that I came up while tinkering with SAP. Say, I have a PO with account assignment F for Order 1. Then during GR, I realized that I placed the wrong account assignment object, which should be Order 2. Can I execute this change during GR or do I have to do it either at the PO or IV level? In the standard MIGO setup, the Account Assignment tab is set to display. I tried checking the details for F in OME9 and found the Account Assignment changeable field. I tried enabling it but I still came up with the same result. I understand the logic behind why is it setup that way, but I want to make sure if there is any workaround for this
    Hope you can respond the soonest.
    Regards,

    I our company (and many others I had contact to) the goods receipt is made by the porter or the warehouse people, in general from people different from the requestor. I mean the receipt is done at the central place where the goods arrive at the plant.
    the internal distribution is made based on the GR slip which has all necessary information.
    A warehouse guy, or even a porter (often from a external security service  provider) should not be able to correct any financially relevant information.
    A change of account assignment data may even be a conflict to existing approval strategies.
    LIV is done by accountants, a totally different skill level compared with warehouse workers.

  • Account assignment category to be greyed out for Scheduling agreement

    Hi all,
    I have a scenario where in, I do not want to have the Account assignment category during creation of Scheduling agreement, but we need to incorporate the account assignment during Goods receipt.
    Can i have your inputs in steps for making this possible?
    Have a great day
    Regards,
    Sasi

    Hi,
    I think this is not possible since ACC flow from SA to GR.
    Just before generating GR put ACC in SA.
    Hope it helps
    Thanks
    suresh

  • Funded Program in ME21N with Account Assignment Category equal BLANK

    Hi
    I am doing one ME21N (create purchase order) with Account Assignment Category equal BLANK " ". In u201Caccount  assignmentu201D the system only allow to fill the fields u201Cfunds centeru201D, and   the u201Ccommitment itemu201D but as the purchase is to INVESTMENT I need to fill the field FUNDED PROGRAM too. I haven´t internal order (CO) and project (wbs element) to do one derivation in this point of process (these objects will be create during the business process).  I have already tried to use the fields of FMDERIVE´s trace but unfortunately any combination help me to define the Funded Program.
    thanks,
    Claudio

    Hi Claudio,
    I want also to share with you some information about Funded Programs.
    Funded programs are used mainly as FM account assignment elements, in the same way as funds, funds centers, commitment items, and functional areas are. Budget can be entered for them and monitored in them.
    You can enter the funded program directly in budgeting, but when you are using the funded program in integrated postings, it is not possible to enter the funded program directly. This is the system design.
    The funded program uses much of the functionality of the Business Data Toolset (BDT). If you want to customize the funded program master data, you should be familiar with the BDT.
    The use of funded program as part of FM account assignment for budgeting, can cause performance issues (posting and reports).
    SAP recommends that:
    a. Funded Program must be derived using rules specified in the FM derivation tool (FMDERIVE);
    b. While you can use any operative element as the source for deriving funded programs, we strongly recommend that you use only WBS elements, orders, or networks.
    For additional information, check SAP help in the following link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/74/35160eea86034aa4166151005e1a93/frameset.htm
    For BDT information, check the following help: http://help.sap.
    com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/78/7c543ac368906ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Value Blank/space is invalid for account assignment element fund

    Hello!
    I created an invoice with several items linked to funds reservation.
    when the invoice has 2 line items, the payment run is executed without problem.
    when the invoice has more than 3 line items, the payment run is executed with error.
    The message error (message number F6804) is "value blank/space is invalid for account assignment element fund".
    I dont know where i should enter a valid value for fund.
    Thanks for your kind help!
    Chiachen

    Hi Chiachen,
    The problem occurred because the functional area is not inherited from the Purchase order during MIRO posting. As a result, error message F6841 is issued.
    There are 2 main programs for the FM derivation:
    1. Function Module FM_DERIVE_ACCOUNT_FROM_COBL
    2. Program LFMCOBLF06
    The latest notes which affects these 2 programs are 1244381 and 1247982.
    Kindly implement these notes using SNOTE.
    During this process, it should also bring in all the other pre-requisite notes. Do not worry if the
    symptoms described in the notes do not match yours. What's more important is to bring the coding in your system up to date. Please retest MIRO after the notes are applied. Let me know the results.
    Check also the notes 17941 and 982511.
    I hope it helps
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • Funds Management  - Wrong Account Assignment getting cleared in PR

    Hi All,
    We are working on Funds Management implementation at our workplace and we are facing a problem relating to account assignment. (SAP ECC 6.0)
    We have defined a Account Assignment Derivation for a material as
    Material Number = A100 assigned to Commitment Item = ComItem1 and Funds Center = FunCen1.
    Now during the creation of a PR for A100, where the Funds Center and Commitment Item fields are mandatory, the wrong commitment item is automatically getting populated (ComItem2 that was defined under a different Funds Center, instead of ComItem1 ;but the fund center field in the PR is alright) and they are also getting passed right up to the MIRO stage, where I get the message "No Commitment Item entered in Item" (here too the wrong funds center and commitment item from the PR are getting populated automatically)
    What's worse is that the budget document contains the new commitment item ComItem2 created under FunCen1.
    I am not clear as to where the assignment to the funds center and the commitment item in the PR happens - and given that the assignment is given as required, how are the wrong values getting populated and then allowed to proceed upto MIRO ?
    Regards,
    Wy

    Hi Eli Klovsky,
    Thanks for the suggestion - was helpful to find out the target fields through the trace.
    We went to the details column for the target field in the rule definition structure, and activated the "Overwrite with New Value" field, and in this case, the new values of fund center and commitment item are getting over-written.
    However, one problem I have faced is that for materials which have no assignments, when we create the PR on the same line as that of the previous PR (By changing the material number), the old values are not getting replaced. They are however getting replaced once we come back and create a new PR, or add the material on another line.
    Have to explore this better - there might be some human errors, where the material number is changed on the same line as that of the previous material PR, in which case, the existence of the previous commitment item and fund centers can result in wrong allocations to other divisions..
    @All,
    Really sorry to be continuing this discussion here, is it possible to move this to the appropriate Public Sector group  ?

  • During creation of WBS element How to pass ACCount Assignment field as blnk

    Hi Experts,
    I am  creating of WBS element by using BAPI   ''BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI'' .
    during creation, passed the ACCount Assignment field  as blank.
    but when i check that WBS in CJ20n that ACCount Assignment field in coming as checked.    Please suggest me how to pass this field as blank.
    Thanks
    Susant
    Edited by: Susanta22 on May 9, 2011 6:08 PM

    I have same issue. how you resolved it.

  • PO Account Assignment Fund Change is not transferred to backend

    We are on SRM 550 SP10 ECS.
    When a PO is being changed, if the fund is changed, that change does not get transferred to R/3. The old Fund when the PO was created is retained on the R/3 side. On the SRM side the new fund is retained.
    Note:
       The fund that I am talking about is under the Account Assignment link of Item data. If the Cost center is changed the new cost center is reflected to the backend.

    Hi KA!
    Have you found a solution to your problem? We have the same problem and is looking for the FM to get the fund center and commitment item from back end.
    Sincerely
    Anders

  • Fund & Gl Account Assignement

    I have created a Fund in FM5I but I don'yt know where to attach a Fund Centre to a GL Account.
    Can some one help me
    Kiran

    Dear Kiran,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_pserv464/helpdata/EN/b9/3ea582417c11d189400000e829fbbd/content.htm
    Having created your commitment item hierarchy, you must then define account assignment items in the G/L accounts, which are relevant to the automatic account assignment derivation from the G/L account.
    Prerequisites
    A prerequisite is that you have first flagged the Commitment item field as an optional entry in Customizing for Financial Accounting by choosing Define screen format per account group (G/L accounts).
    To ensure that data is correctly recorded and that commitment/actual values are correctly analyzed in the information system, it is essential that you define the correct control parameters for account assignment items in G/L accounts. If you do not, the values may be wrongly posted and displayed.
    Activities
    If you post to a particular G/L account, the posting is simultaneously recorded in the commitment item stored in it. The control parameters determine how and where the values are recorded in Funds Management.
    When you enter a posting, the system proposes the commitment item from the G/L account for that line item. In accordance with the settings entered in Customizing, this recommendation value can be transferred or overwritten with another commitment item.
    The financial transaction and item category are automatically taken over from the line item when you post.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • While PR Conversion In To PO System Pop Message Enter Account Assignment

    Hello
    PR is created from work order having account assignment category as "F" and Work order has Outline agreement which having the account assignment category as "U" .when i am trying to convert the PR TO PO system throw pop up messsage for input account assignment as PR having assignment category as "F" and account assignment as Order number eventhogh while PR TO PO conversion its is asking me account assignment .it should automaticaly coppied from PR.but it is not happening.Please suggest any clue for this strange system behaviour.
    regards,
    Rakesh

    Hi,
    Is there any coincidence among those PRs or materials or Order types?
    Please check the following tables.
    T163K account assignment category customizing
    T162K field selection
    T163A combination of item category and account assignment category.
    SPRO >> Materials Management...>Purchasing...>Account Assignment..>Define Combination of Item Categories/Account Assignment Categories.
    Assign the required Item category to AAC category & try.
    Combination item category L/account assignment category E not defined
    Regards,
    Maheswaran.

  • PM Error Message " FM Account assignment is incomplete (Funds center) messa

    Dear PM Experts.
    We use PM module for both Preventive maintenance and Breakdown maintenace.
    While creating an breakdown maintenance order, the system gives me an error message: " FM Account assignment is incomplete (Funds center), error  message number FI135";
    As a result i cant release the order for further processing.
    Kindly help me to resolve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Richard.

    Hi
    Try below it may solve your problem .
    1. Go To Change Order  (IW32)
    2. form the Menu Path --- GOTO -- Assignments -- Fund Management
    3. Either your Fund center field will be blank there or the Fund Center available there is no more Valid now .
    4. Get the correct Fund Center from commercial & Enter there --- Save the Order & Release it .
    Regards
    Sameer

  • Consuming document with different account assignment from Earmarked Funds

    Hi,
    We have implemented Public Sector FM functionality in version ECC 6.0 and we are using Earmarked Funds (Funds Reservation).
    The system is allowing to post consuming documents with different account assignment from that in the
    Funds reservation document nevertheless we donu2019t have set the indicator 'Acct.asst.changeable' in the Funds Reservation document.
    I don't need the fields Fund Center and Commitment Item to be transfered from earmarked funds document (Define Rules for Account Assignment Transfer). Instead, if consuming document have a different account assignment, the user should get the error message no. RE603 'Account assignment differs from document XX 001'.
    In version 4.6C it worked this way. In our case the Fund Center is delivered from Cost Center and Commitment Item is delivered from Cost Element (SAP - Derivation Strategy for FM Object Assignment).
    I hope someone can help me.
    Thanks in advance,
    Rodrigo

    Hi,
    You get the error message RE603 when you make the settings below:
    1. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Account assignment transfer > Define rules for account assignment transfer; you flag the 'Active' boxes for account assignment (sort of conterintuitive).
    2. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Change message control; change RE603 to 'E'.
    3. In Earmarked fund document, flag the 'Acct.asst. changeable' box (totally conterintuitive).
    Please give it a try and let us know the outcome.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • An error occurred in system XYZ during account assignment

    Hello all,
    I have a scenario and I am copying a service product from one service order to another service order and I am getting this error below. If I use the saem service product individually in service order -2 I do not get this error.
    *An error occurred in system DV1CLNT400 during account assignment
    Message no. CRM_ORDER_MISC 060
    Diagnosis
    Errors occurred when assigning an account assignment object to a business transaction. To view the error message, see the accompanying log file.
    Transfer Log
    Object link not known in CO (Notification E IAOM 019)*

    Hi Manoj
    You need to assign the Controlling object type and as per the standard there are 3 controlling object types those are,
    1) Single object Controlling --> The service order replicated to ECC creates a Internal order and finally cost and revenues are posted or settled in the cost center
    2) Mass Object Controlling --> The cost and revenues of the service order are directly posted to CO-PA(Cost & Profitability Analysis)
    3) No Controlling
    Based on the business requirements you need to define the Controlling obejct,you will find the IMG customization path in ECC as follows,
    IMG>Integration with other mySAP components>CRM>Settings for Service Processing>Controlling integration-->Establish Controlling type, Controlling scenario & Controlling level.
    I hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Arun

  • An error occurred in system Q22CLNT318 during account assignment

    Hi,
    While creating service order in CRM QA server I am getting following error message:
    "An error occurred in system Q22CLNT318 during account assignment"
    Could somebody help me in this regard and explain the steps to solve the issue.
    Regards
    Amandeep Dhaliwal

    Hello,
    Errors in account determination occurs because of following reasons:
    The account assignment group in the customer master record of the payer has not been maintained.
    The account assignment group in the material master record of a billing item has not been maintained.
    Customizing of account assignment has not been set up correctly.
    Controlling Area settings is not correctly done.
    Regards,
    Rajendra

  • An error occurred in system during account assignment RFC way

    Hello Partners.
    I created a function ( FM ) type RFC and this FM call CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN .
    The function creates Service Reques 'BUS2000223'.
    When I test the function locally, All is ok.
    But when the function is called from SAP IS-U, I have a problem
    The operation is created but with an error:
    An error occurred in system XXXXX during account assignment
    Errors occurred when assigning an account assignment object to a business transaction
    CRM_ORDER_MISC 060
    CRM_OFI 002
    I don´t have standard integration with the service request with sap IS-U. 
    Regards.
    Roberto

    Hi Manoj
    You need to assign the Controlling object type and as per the standard there are 3 controlling object types those are,
    1) Single object Controlling --> The service order replicated to ECC creates a Internal order and finally cost and revenues are posted or settled in the cost center
    2) Mass Object Controlling --> The cost and revenues of the service order are directly posted to CO-PA(Cost & Profitability Analysis)
    3) No Controlling
    Based on the business requirements you need to define the Controlling obejct,you will find the IMG customization path in ECC as follows,
    IMG>Integration with other mySAP components>CRM>Settings for Service Processing>Controlling integration-->Establish Controlling type, Controlling scenario & Controlling level.
    I hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Arun

Maybe you are looking for

  • WBS Element missing dashes

    Hi all, For the WBS element within the ECC dev system, the format designed is as follows YA-XXXXXX-XXXXXX-XXX. The WBS element is extracted from ECC to BW correctly. We have noticed that within the ECC QA environment, the WBS Element still follows th

  • Error in forms6i when running in web

    hi, I do have a problem in running a form in the web. all forms that we did, just went fine but this form is very different, it is running fine in client/server, but when we transfer it in web, the window automatically minimizes, and when you maximiz

  • Can't login using Firefox. (Mac OS X)

    I can't login to Adobe or the forum using Firefox (v30.0) Mac, which is my main browser. I'm only logged in right now using Safari. Here is a screen shot of the errors in the error console. I see this problem in archived threads, and they seemed to h

  • Built In iSight wont 'transmit'

    Was working in chatrooms and on yahoo messenger ( and Mercury ) but now no longer transmits. Anyone else come across this recently ?

  • Overal Result is changing when drill down the char - report is having cond.

    Hi , we are running one report, the overal result is changing by drill down one char. if we remove drill down  the same char. then it is displying the original value. Note: we have one condition on the report. in the _Characterstiv Assignment tab_  t