Funds Mangement - Derivation of Tolerence profiles

Hi
I have created a tolerence profile, which has to give only 'information' even after 100 % of budget usage.
I have written a derivation rule for a particular CI pointing to this profile.
Assigned the Tolerence profile derivation strategy to FM area and AVC ledger ( 9I) I am using only CB.
My standard profile is to throw an error when budget exceeds 100%.
When i post an entry (through FB60) for the above commitment item for which i have written derivation of tolerence profile. System not overriding my standard profile. Did i miss any thing ?"
Thanks in advance
Chris

Hi Chris,
Check in your strategy, if you selected the 'overwrite with a new value' flag for the tolerance profile (the ddefault is no). Also, keep in mind, that you can always put a trace on this derivation exactly as for FMDERIVE.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Import Purchase Order issue in Fund-mangement

Dear Sir,
We have implemented Fund-Mangement and are facing following problem in Import Purchase Order .
In Import Purchase Order , the CVD & Additional Duty are the MODVATABLE items . But as per standard SAP practice , we are mentioning tax code as V0 for Import Purchase Order and CVD/Additional Dutiy are treated as Delivery Cost . Due to such practice , after the Import Purchase Order creation , in the Fund Management the committed amount includes the CVD/Additional Duty also . But as per our business requirement , we want that CVD/Additional Duty being MODVATABLE they should get excluded from the Commitment Amount .
However incase of Domestic Purchase Order , we do not face this problem because here we mention the relevant Tax-Code and MODVATABLE excise duties are mentioned with the set-off condition under the relevant Tax-Code .
We request you to kindly guide us , as what steps should we follow to resolve the reported problem pl .
With Thanks & Regards
Sonia Agarwal

Hi,
I have assigned FR3 in accurals....now it is showing both the debit and credit enteries.I have given Tax code in import PO as V1(10%). In Bill of entry is showing me the error "Error in account determination: table T030K key FGH1 VST V0" because i am selecting the V0 (0%) Tax code.
I do not know why it is asking here as in OB40 already the account is assigned.
Please advice

No fund center derive

Dear sapient
I am getting an error while doing PR. "no fund center derive". I created one derivation rule
MATERIAL NUMBER=COMMITMENT ITEM-FUND CENTER
User is entering 4 line item with different material code, but in line item 3 system is deriving correct fund center and commitment item. in other line system is deriving only commitment item not the fund center.
systme showing error NO FUND CENTER DERIVE FOR LINE ITEM 10,20,40.
Please suggest me.
thnx and regards
Soraj

HI Eli
Thanx for reply. I activated the trace but only commitment item is deriving .
Sory to say that user have given wrong inform that in one line item FUND CENTER & COMMITMENT ITEM is flowing.
but actuly fund center is not coming in all 10,20,30,40 line items.
Please let me know the reason. if i did any mistake. or shall i create two different rule like
MATERIAL NUMBER= COMMITMENT ITEM
MATERIAL NUMBER=FUND CENTER
Thanx and regards
Soraj

Funds Management-Derive Fund centre from Cost Centre

Dear Guru
In funds management -Derive Fund centre from Cost Centre" i used to have 8000 entries till yesterday. So there were 8000 combinations of fund center with cost center.
Somehow I can only see 80 today. Somebody might have deleted those.
Is there any change log availble to see who deleted and when?
Archit

Hi,
I see... Deletion is not logged there, I'm afraid; only modifications on existing entries. Unless, you have specifically defined log status for the relevant FM table, which I doubt. I believe, no one would delete 8000 records just for laugh. Most probable, the entries were deleted with a transport request.
One more reason to follow my advice and maintain the link in a different manner.
Regards,
Eli

Funds Mangement - Fund center derivation error at the time of PO/MIGO

Hello -
Generally ,If FM account assignements are available in purchase requisition , same should be carried to purchase order and to the good receipts. But I am getting an error at the time of PO or MIGO that " Fund center not derived'. Why this happening ? What can I do to avoid this problem. can I create a step in the derivation to keep the original FM assignments from the previous documents....is there something to do with field status??
Thanks in Advance
Chris

Hi
Please read carefully tye warehouse concept
Excample warehouse concept II
>At PR no FM update
>At PO no FM update
>AT GR no FM update
>AT consumption on Cost center, WBS or Internal order FM is updated and AVC is checked
Read the release note of ERP 6 or ERP5 the customising of Warehouse concept is well explained
In sumary:
Create a stock commitment item statistically
Create a warehouse funds center
Create a funds
Create a derivation rule for warehouse concept 2
Create a derivation rule where you have plant, valuation class and warehouse funds center
Cretae a derivation rule fund>warehouse funds center>stock commitment item
Go in customising integration to make field status for assignement FM account asignments
Select PO and PR and make optional the funds, funds cenbter, commitment item
And when you will create a PR or PO FM data will come automatically
ciao
Salvator
PSM-FM Consultant
BXL

Fund center derivation based on functional location cost center

Hi,
can anybody share the process to derive fund center based on cost center assigned to functional location/equipment of a plant maintenance order
Thanks

Hi Eli,
Thanks for your response.
Scenario is as follows:
Cost is booked to PM order & settles to cost centers. I don't have budget at PM order level. But will have budget in fund management for cost center. So whenever I book cost to PM order it should check budget available in fund center. Fund center should be derived from cost center assigned to functional location of PM Order
I have not used function module before for derivation. I have created a derivation rule based on functional module but there is no place to assign fund center in derivation rule. Please explain the process to derived fund center through PM order in above scenario.
Thanks

No funds center derived for GR IR account

Dear all,
We have faced a strange issue in Funds Management. We have a GR IR GL account for which system automatically derives the commitment item and fund center based on those in the PO. That is, whatever FC and CI are maintained in the PO, the GR IR account derives the same accounts during MIRO.
However this is true only for material POs. We have created a service PO for a specific network of a project. In this particular case the system is not allowing us to post the invoice as it cannot derive the fund center. It seems during MIRO, the FM accounts of PO are not getting linked to the GR IR account. Please note that GR (or service entry sheet entry) is not relevant for budget consumption. Budget consumption takes place during PR,PO and MIRO.
Request your input in this regard.
Thanks
Snigdho

Hi,
First of all, you need to be sure that all existent correction notes are implemented in your system.
Please check if the following notes are applied in your system (including manual steps):
1289547 FM account assignment incorrect in GR/IR clearing in service
1327560 GR Account Assignments based on previoustly posted SES
1429223 GR Account Assignments based on previoustly posted SES II
1450965 FM account assignment incorrectly inherited from PO
1480503 FM account assignment for GL line overwritten in MIRO
1502874 Planned Delivery Costs are not updated during GR/IR postings
These notes correct wrong behaviours in include LFMCOBLF06 related to account assignment.
If the notes are not there but are valid to your current release/package, please apply all in one test system and retest your issue.
Regarding inheriting the FM assignments, material po's can retrieve the FM account assignments from the FM tables.
This ensures that the current FM account assigments are always used.
However, in the case of Services, it is not possible to use the FM tables as it is not guaranteed that the correct Account assigment will be retrieved. So, the SES table ESKN is used instead. The ESKN record is created at the time the SES is created.
In Summary: Due to the structure of Service documents, the FM tables cannot be used to access the previous document's account assignment. Material documents can use the FM tables to get the previous account assignemnt. So, for Material documents, FMDERIVE does not need to be called when a predecessor document is found. However, FMDERIVE needs to be called for SES because the SES application table does not store FM fields. So, this needs to be rederived.
I suggest you also to read SAP Note 923672 (do not apply it).
The account assignments on the SES screen are indeed changable. This is part of the standard design for SES process. Unfortunately, FM cannot control if the fields on the account assignment popup screen should be in edit, display, or hidden mode. This screen is control by SES, therefore is good that you check also this customizing in MM:
IMG - Materials Management - Purchasing - Account Assignment - Maintain Account Assignment Categories
In this activity, for the account assignment category which is the account assignment category used in the P.O., you have flag 'Acct. Assg. Changeable', then, the account assignment should be derived again. Not sure if you can restrict by different processes and for SES have this flag not marked so FMDERIVE will be not called and the FM account assignments would be inherit from the PO.
From my understanding, if the PO concern is a service PO, it is legitimate to accept the service (via ML81N) with different account assignments. Hence, the account assignment fields are not hidden or in display mode only.
From FM point of view, if a user does not deliberately change the account assignments on the SES screen or FMDERIVE is not setup to overwrite the FM account assignments, then by default the FM account assignments are inherited from the PO.
I hope this helps to overcome your issue.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Fund Center derivation based on PM order

Hi all,
Our requirement is that Fund Center should be derived from the cost center field (location tab) in the PM order. I am using function module FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER to achieve the result. I am getting the result but it is disturbing my process orders creation as there is no cost center field in process order master
I want to make a condition based on PM order type. what is the best option. Can i use the following
First derivation rule . update Order Type to USERTEMP1
Second derivation rule: call FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER and put a condition to check USERTEMP1 is PM order types
Please advise. Will it affect any other area
Lincy

Hi,
Yes, the way you described would be most common practice to deal with this requirement. You read the relevant data through built-in function module (or user-exit) and put the value in temporarily field. Then, in the next rule you base FM derivation on that field.
Regards,
Eli

Deriving roles and profiles

Hi,
i am using pfcg for creating roles. When i want to derive a role from a mother role the profile is not taken with the role. Is there a way to derive not only the role but also the profile from a mother role?
Regards
Florian

Hello Florian
I still do not see the point yet if the derived role should be identical to the master role then you could do the following:
(1) Copy master role -> name of derived role
(2) Update table AGR_DEFINE for the derived role name, i.e.
- select all values from AGR_DEFINE with AGR_NAME = '<name of derived role>'
- set AGR_NAME-parent_agr = '<name of master role>'
Regards
Uwe

Funds Mangement - Superior Fund Center ?

Hi
What is the use of superior fund center, When do we have to use it. I have seen in some of the treads that budget of superior fund center exceeded etc ( coudnt understand why it happens). In cost center hierarchy each node is a cost center group. In this case each node is going to be superior fund center. In what way these hierarchy mechanisms are different and why. Please clarify i am in the process of finializing master data, wondering to consider a superior fund center or not.
Thanks in Advance
Chris

Thank you Eli -
Can't i derive a budget address if it is not a superior fund center.
When you say reporting - is it like this - When i run for a superior fund center, does it give me a report considering the subordinate fund center's budget and commit /actuals ?
Please bear the inconvenience, I wish to test before posting a question but I am in the decision making stage to implement all these.
Kind regards
Chris

Funds mangement config.

HI,
could you please any one send me configurtion steps for funds management in ecc 5 apart from sap best practce flow.

In derivation rules -
I have assigned cost elements to a non budgetable commitment item with a condition that the order number range of investment orders.
There is a business TRANSAC for order settlement, I have created a rule with a condition that cost elements assigned to non budgetable CI when the Business Transac = order settlement.
Thanks
CHris

Fund mangement is active

Dear All,
In our Organization Fund management is activated all ready, Now we are implementing PS module coz of Fund management we could not able to create PR through PS and Budget also through Fmderiver we are assigning Budget for WBS .
When we Generate PR in CJ20n It is showing- Error in Commitment Check(Coz of fund management activation), If we need to create PR user has to Use ME51N not in CJ20n, Kindly suggest me
Thank you,
Regards,
Naveendra

Understand that user has selected wrong G/L while creatin the PO , since the last financial year is closed you can not reverse the MIGO noe.
for smplicty let we assue that "X" was the correct G/L and "Y" was the wrogn G/L
Becasue in MIGO transcations, the wrong G/L is already being debited we can not have much to do in this case.
You can do the MIRO of the vendor and post the manual JV.
Y G/L credit to
X G/L debit.
Thanks,
Vikas Rander.

Funds Mangement - Multiple Account Assignments in Stock procurement (PR/PO)

In any unassigned Purchase requisition / Order ( purely stock procurement, not for an order, cost center etc.) it is understood that Fund center has to be entered manually if it were to consume budget. How can i assign multiple Fund centers for a single item of a PR/PO.
e.g. I am procuring 100 units of a material, of which 50 item should consume budget of Fund center1 and other 50 should consume budget of FC2.
In ME51N screen, multiple account assignment icon is disabled unless we give account assignment category other than blank. is there any enhancement / exit that can be used to make it available to assign multiple fund centers.
Thanks in advance
Chris

If I have 50 fund centers, 50 line items are carried from PR to RFQ and MM has to maintain prices for 50 line items though the material is one and will have problem at the time of partial goods receipts also. Can you think any work around for this ?
according to Warehouse concept1, FM account assignments are know before purchasing and are entered in MM document. I am hoping SAP would have thought about scenario where multiple FM accounts are too many - Solution to this problem would save us lot of time , energy.
Thanks in Advance
Chris

FM - Fund Mangement Ledger 9H

Dear Expert
How can i check setting for ledger 9H ( currancy - summary table - valuation )
like the rest ledgers in SAP have transaction code to change the stting related for example transaction code gcl2 and
So please help me ASAP
Thanks
SAM

Hi,
It's a mix of things in your first post. If you work with budget structure and budget addresses and you want to check budget on CI 61, even if the posting CI is 616, then it has nothing to do with Budget Account Assignment (FMDERIVE). You can meet this requirement simply with budget structure. Just make sure that it's duly assigned and flagged in the relevant year to your FM area and that the rules are correctly maintained.
Working with FMDERIVE has a different meaning; there, you subsitute/derive original FM assignment by the one defined in the strategy, i.e. you don't preserve 'original' CI which was entered in the document. The ultimate result might be the same as with budget structure, but the treatment is different.
So, you should choose if for this matter you work with budget structure or with FMDERIVE.
Regards,
Eli

GL account linkage with activity group for AVC- Funds management

Hi,
I have activated (BCS) funds management in my system. My client wants that system will give error message for some expense GL accounts and for other expense GL accounts it will only give information message.
For that i have created new activity group for AVC but i have no idea how we can link GL accounts with activity group for AVC.
Request immediate help.
Thanks in advance.
Manisha

Hi,
The correct way to deal with this is not with activity groups, but with tolerance profiles. Create tolerance profiles with error and warning messages accordingly and then create a tolerance derivation strategy, which on the basis of commitment item, will derive the relevant profile.
Regards,
Eli

Funds Mangement - Derivation of Tolerence profiles

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for