Future period date posting on MIRO

Hi guys,
I need to consist the invoice date field at miro, so the system does not allow the user to inform a future date at the invoice receipt. I have seen that in other discussions were some people say that we can't just change the message f5192 to error, and some say that we can create a validation rule for this document. I talked to the FI consultant here and he said that he doesn't see the table rbkp in the validation rule. Does anyone know how can we do this? Where is it at GGB0?
Thanks in advance.
Marcelo Buosi.

Hi Adam, thanks for your reply
The problem is that, activating this message as an error, all invoice posting are going to be affected. I can't just use it for MIRO transaction, for that matter. Therefore, I should use some user exit implementation or a validation rule.
Regards,
Marcelo Buosi.

Similar Messages

  • Rejection Reason - Future Period Date Placed in Service

    Hello all,
    While running PRC: Interface Assets to Oracle Assets program, I got Rejection Reason as Future Period Date Placed in Service
    Please give your inputs to clear this issue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Muthu

    Hi
    The Date Placed on Service should be within an open period in Projects. FA period should also be open.
    It seems you enter a Date placed on service which is later than the end of the open Project period.
    Dina

  • Future posting date in MIGO MIRO

    Hi,
    My client want that system should not allow future posting date than current system date in MIGO & MIRO.
    Ex. current system date: 30.12.2008
          then system should not allow posting date 31.12.2008.
    Please help how to do it.
    Regard's
    Parag lute

    Hi Parag
    To meet your client requirement, you need to change the message F5 192 from warning to Error.
    Since this message F5 192 is not a customised, ABAP need to change code.Contact ABAPer.
    Also you can check with OSS if they have any note for this requirement.
    Hope this anwers your query
    Prasad

  • Settlement Posted to future period

    Hi All,
    User has execute the settlement in CJ88 to an asset by giving future period 12/2010. Value of settlement was Zero and no accounting document got generated. Only CO and Asset line items with Zero values.
    Now when he tries to reverse the settlement it is giving error
    "Reversal cannot be posted (system error)
    Procedure
    When you reverse a posting that originated during the transfer of balances during the asset data transfer, use transaction OASV (FI-AA Customizing "Transfer balances"). Manually create a reverse posting (with reversed positive/negative signs) for each line item in the document you want to reverse. If it is no longer possible to use transaction OASV, use transaction ABF1"
    There is no asset document generated and we can reverse as above.
    It is not allowing to settle for 01/2010, as it says perform settlement after 12/2010.
    Please let me know how this issue can be resolved.
    Thanks
    Satish

    Hi,
    For new asset the Capitalization date is not updated in the Asset Master and for old asset the date is previous settlement date.
    Thanks
    Satish

  • Can't Run AFAB - Posting run requested for future period

    Hi,
    While taking depreciation run for company code in AFAB system is generating the error message "Posting run for future period requested (check entry)" SAP error AA697
    Diagnosis
    There was a check of your entries in the company code and posting period fields for the current system date. The result of this check is that you requested a posting run for company code xxxx for a future fiscal period.
    Please help me, cause I must close the period.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Check Table TABA, whats your last posted period for depreciation
    If you are executing depreciation for last period + 1, then this error is not justified
    If you are doing it for last period + 2, then its justified
    Br, Ajay M

  • Subcontractor Invoice from MIRO with Retention of Fixed Future "Due Date"

    Post retention entry to subcontractor
    Business scenario
    PO Raised in MM
    Retention deducted from All Vendor ABC Bill will be released on 31/12/2009
    All Invoices of Vendor ABC will have same due date ending 31/12/2009 irrespective of the Bill posting Date
    Questions:-
    1. Can MIRO auto post the Retention Line item with future due date
    2. Can all MIRO have the same due date
    Please advice

    Hello,
    Apart from above suggestions, please check below blog as well where you can calculate dynamic due date for fixed day payment terms.
    Fixed day payment terms - The magic behind due date determination!!!
    Thanks,
    V V

  • Depreciation error - Unplanned posting run allow for future period

    Dear ,
    Need urgent advice for depreciation error happen in our production system.
    FYI, our fiscal year variant 2013 = Feb 2012 - Jan 2013 ( We are now at month-end close for Pr 1 2013 ).And fiscal year close 2012 AJAB and Carry forward ARJW have successfully run for new FY 2013.
    In short, in our asset accounting user was accidentally run unplannned depreciation for future period 12/2013 of one particular asset, while we are now in Pr 1/2013. And, Pr12/2013 is open for asset posting.However, no FI posting posted into the system.
    Just a curiosity as to why system allow user to run unplanned depreciation for future posting without giving an error message to follow the posting cycle.
    The impact/error of above unplanned depreciation run:
    User is not allowed to execute AFAB depreciation run for Pr 1/2013. Even worst, in the AFAB program shows from Pr 1/2013 - 12/2013 is already posted when we do depreciation test run. We can't perform any planned,repeat,restart  for Pr1/2013.
    Because of only one asset had accidentally run for Pr12/2013, all of our asset (96,773 asset) cannot proceed with depreciation run for Pr 1/2013 in the new fiscal year.
    This is high priority as it will impact the entire depreciation run for 12 month of our company.
    Your early reply on this issue is greatly appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Latifah

    Thank you for the response.
    FYI, the asset posting actually has been executed but no document was posted as there's no value.
    I've check the 2 tables below:
    ANLC - No numbers of run for any period in FY2013
    ANLP - No depreciation run was posted in FY13 (all periods).
    Is there anyway for us to do normal planned run for Pr 1/2013? As i understand SAP has no function to perform reversal depreciation run in AFAB. How
    With regard to the posting period 12/2013 that is open for user, I already highlighted this to the respective custodian.
    Thanks.

  • Info Record Validity Dates - Future Period

    Hi Gurus
    can you help
    we have current Purchase Info Recs in place, with pricing condition records that have a validity date that will expire in the next few days
    we have already loaded the next pricing for the next cotnract period with the vendor, but wish to check the accuracy of the data before that pricing condition becomes "current"
    do you know how can we pull the data from the future validity period pricing condition record, so we can validiate this
    i have only found ways to get the current pricing conditions, but not the one for the future period
    please advise
    many thanks

    hi Velu
    we maintain Pricing Condition Type PB00 in ME13
    when i key a Pur Ord for the part, then go to Conditions tab in ME21n, then select the Analysis of the Pricing Condition, it bring up Procedure RM0000
    then Gross Price PB00, then various steps under this
    a number of steps not executed due to requirements not filled etc, being Contracts, outline agreements, Plant Infor Rec Order Unit, then Material Info Rec (Plant Specific)  A017, then Material Info Rec table A018 with various field names
    For Access Sequence step Mat Info Rec (Plant Specific)  it does say No condition record was found for this condition using the document data.
    any thoughts
    If we cannot resolve i shall leave it for now, and review on the day it becomes current
    many thanks

  • Document Date & Posting date relations with PO-GRN-MIRO.

    Dear Experts,
    Could you please join the date relations for PO-GRN-MIRO with DOCUMENT DATE & POSTING DATE.
    I want to ask that what exactly we say Document Date & Posting Date to PO - GRN & MIRO.

    what exactly we say Document Date & Posting Date
    Just type in google difference between document date and posting date  and execute.  You will find lot of threads discussed on this topic.  Please dont post any query without searching the forum or google.
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Posting run for future period requested (check entry)

    Hi,
    While taking depreciation run for company code in AFAB system is generating the error message "Posting run for future period requested (check entry)" SAP error AA697
    I checked in OB52 postings periods are open for 2009(all periods)
    SAP note 1150235 (all corrections) and 1153718 are completely implemented.
    Still the problem is not resolved.
    Regards,
    Sankar

    Hi Sankar,
    I would like to refer you to the already implemented note 1153718 which states :
    After you implement the changes, the system issues error message AA 697      
    "Posting run for future period requested (check entry)" immediately when     
    you use a fiscal year that is in the future.  In principle, you can          
    customize this message. However, in this case, no settings are taken         
    into account; the system always issues an error message.                     
    Regards Bernhard

  • Posting run for future period requested

    Dear Team,
    While taking depreciation run for company code in AFAB system is generating the error message "Posting run for future period requested (check entry)" SAP error AA697
    please help to reslove the issue.
    Regards,
    MAhendra

    Hi,
    look into the Threads,
    Can't Run AFAB - Posting run requested for future period
    Regards
    Andi

  • Posting run request for future period; check your entry message no.AA697

    Hello Guru's,
    I have below error while Depreciation run in T.Code AFAB
    "Posting run requested for future period; check your entry" message no.AA697
    Request help
    thanks in advance
    Regards
    Chintamani

    Hello Chintamani,
    Why you want to post the depreciation for future period?
    Is the future fiscal year in open or is the posting period open for that? If no, please open that period with AJRW T code if you want to post the depreciation for future period but it is not recommendable.
    Check the posting period once again because the given posting period belongs to future year? So please do re-chk and give correct period according to your current fiscal year.
    You can get your fiscal year details and assignment of fiscal year variant to the co,code details in OB29 and OB37 t codes respectfully.
    Check the OSS Note: 1150235 - Preventing depreciation posting run for future
    I hope it helps else revert us with your query.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Lakshmi S

  • Exchange Rate difference posting during MIRO posting

    Hi ,
    We are facing an issue for exchange rate difference posting during MIRO.
    PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date. Vendor in PO has different currency than company code currency. Exchange rate maintained in OB08 for this period is taken in PO.
    PO value & GR value is same. Due to raw material cost there was price difference posted during GR posting.
    (i.e. Raw material cost - GR/IR value = Price difference amount)
    During posting MIGO, 3 accounts got posted.
    Raw material cost account got debited & offset credit to GR/IR account & price difference account (in vendor & company code currency also)
    During posting MIRO, 4 accounts got posted.
    Vendor account got credited with GR/IR amount & offset to GR/IR account debit.
    Exchange rate difference account got credited & offset to price difference account (in company code currency only)
    Since PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date, then why system has posted exchange rate difference account in local currency only during MIRO posting ?
    Your inputs appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi,
    there is a setting in configuration of logistics invoice verification where you can control the calculation and posting of exchange rate differences. If you had the setting active that exchange rate differences are calculated against a planned exchange rate, that might lead to the kind of postings you describe. Please check.
    best regards,   Udo

  • Dunning on future due date

    Hi,
    We just installed SBO 8.8 and are still in the testing proces.
    I want to run a dunning, and in step 4 of the wizard enter a future due date, but I keep getting the error "Future posting date is not allowed (Dunning Wizard - Creation Date) (Message 60014-19)
    The date of the dunning run is today and dunning term and level are "all", in step 4 posting date is to today (25 March 2011) and due date is to 2 weeks from now (8 April 2011). I can't clear posting date and just enter due date to.
    In document settings "Allow future posting date" is checked.
    In posting period setup the periods are unlocked, the posting date is from the first of the month to the last date of the month and due date is from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2049.
    Does anybody know why this doesn't work?

    Hi Josephine,
    If you tick the 'Display all open items' tickbox in step 4, it will allow you to leave the Posting Date empty and to select a future Due Date.
    Regards,
    Nat

  • Change future periods for Fiscal year variant-OB29

    Hi experts,
    We are using 4-4-5 rule, Fiscal year variant is M1, Future Periods for FY variant M1 is not maintained correctly.  Our year end is on 6/25/2011 but in our variant M1 it is defined as 7/2/2011 and periods following that are defined incorrectly.
    Company - US (4-4-5 rule)
    FY variant - M1
    Period - P12/2011 and following periods are not defined correctly
    1.     There are risks involved if you change the fiscal year in Live SAP system.  What is the risks for changing future periods - 2 months from now.
    2.     Posting are not carried out for the periods we are changing.  We need to check plan data if any
    3.     Impact on other modules, organization structure, master data, transaction data
    4.     How intense the testing needs to be.
    Any help will be appreciated and point will be assigned.
    Thanks
    Monica

    Hello,
    If you change the Fiscal year period in the live system the following problems may come as per my understanding.
    For Costing Module Planning would have already been carried our at the start of the year,
    similarly for CS, PP and PS modules if they are implemented in your company the planning data will be effected.
    If there is any Budjet posted even you have to consider how to change  the budget and reaccolation
    Best Regards,
    Ravi

Maybe you are looking for

  • Installing 8i Personal Edition

    I am installing Oracle 8i Personal Edition on windows 98 and I ran into a problem. I couldn't install the Database Configuration Asistant. The log reads: Documents\Downloads\Oracle8i\starterdb is an invalid command line argument So it is looking in D

  • WSH_EXCEPTIONS Table becomes 38 GB

    Follwoing are the tables which are consuming space for tablespace APPS_TS_TX_DATA. select segment_name, sum(bytes)   from dba_segments where tablespace_name = 'APPS_TS_TX_DATA' group by segment_name order by 2 desc;         SEGMENT_NAME              

  • No Acc. Doc generated after Post Good Issue - please help!

    Hi All, I have problem when I try to post good issue, the accounting doc doesn't generated. I have created SO, (Order type - OR, item category - TAB, Schedule Line cat - CB), created PO after the purchase requisition was generated in the SO. processe

  • "Border" appears when I click on a button

    Hello, I'm creating a rollover button graphic to open a friend's webpage. His logo is a circle; I am creating a rollover effect that depresses the circle when you rollover and click. Here's the strange problem, and this has come up before: when you c

  • Dynamically find values for M_EINK_FRG for FRGCO

    I would like to dynamically fill the release code value in the authorization object M_EINK_FRG based on the user entering ME54N. Can this be done? So instead of putting 06 as a value in this object I'd like to put a field name that would be filled wh