General Error handling

I've managed to get myself confused with error handling in Forms 6i.
If I have a trigger that does a 'commit-form' like this
commit_form;
IF NOT form_success THEN
RAISE form_trigger_failure;
END IF;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN;
END;
and the commit_form fails due to a mandatory field being missing (or similar) then what happens first?
Does my ON-ERROR trigger fire?
Does the form_success check fail and raise form_trigger failure?
Does my exception block get used?
Or does more than 1 happen??
I could - of course - find the answer to this through debug but I'm looking for a more generic answer if possible.
Thanks - Sean.

What happens first?  The forms validation process runs and informs user that the field is required.
Does On-Error fire?  Yes, if you have one in your form.
Does the form_success check fail and raise form_trigger failure?  Yes -- but ONLY if your On-error raises Form_trigger_failure.  If it does not, you have lots of problems.
Does my exception block get used?  Yes.  Raising Form_trigger_failure causes control to pass to the exception handler.  But I never use an exception handler except when I code SQL commands.
Now...  After commit_form, you should also check Form_Status.  Read the help topic on the Form_Success built-in.
My standard C00_Commit program unit does this:
  COMMIT_FORM;
  IF :SYSTEM.FORM_STATUS <> 'QUERY'
  OR NOT FORM_SUCCESS THEN
    RAISE FORM_TRIGGER_FAILURE;
  END IF;
END;

Similar Messages

  • How to add sound to the general error handler

    I'm looking for an easy way to create an audible indication (a beep or something) when the general error handler displays an error message.  Anyone have any suggestions??
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Bill,
    I thought this was an interesting idea, so I wrote up the code and posted it on the NI Community here: Simple Error Handler with Beep.  If you have any cool VIs that you'd like to share, you can post them on the community as well to share them with others.  Thanks!
    Stephen Meserve
    National Instruments

  • Using the general error handler on an embedded rt target

    I would like to know how the general error handler can be best employed
    with Labview RT on a Compact Fieldpoint controller.  Clearly no
    dialogue options are valid so how can error information be accessed
    remotely - is there an error log file available on the controller?

    I think there are plenty of ways to handle errors with Labview RT on a Fieldpoint controller.
    Usually I use the general error handler vi to catch the error and get the error message (sure, no dialog), then write the eroor message into a log file (ordinary text file created on the controller), and/or send the eroor message through TCP/IP network to the host. You can use FTP to open, read and tranfer the log file at host. Hope help.
    Xu

  • General Error Handling - use of FEH (PPO/ECH)

    We are investigating the usage of Forward Error Handling, known with SAP as PPO (Post Processing) and ECH (Error Capture Handler) to be able to re-process errors (automatically or manually) from incoming messages.
    I am interested in talking with anyone who has implemented this. General questions are:
    - how have you found it to work in real life?
    - configuration/set-up straight-forward?
    - what scenarios have used it in?
    - incorporated into your custom services?
    But am interested in any comments.
    I am posting this within the PI forum as it ties into the fact we async scenarios inbound to SAP, typically from our PI system, and when those scenarios encounter an error we are looking for a way to have a business/end user - friendly interface for reprocessing the error. Implementing a proxy scenario, and thus having the errors show within sxmb_moni/sxi_monitor, is probably not going to work for us - too technical.  I am also aware of an add-on, AIF I believe, but our company is not interested in installing that.
    There are 4 blogs out there that I am aware of - 2 from Tobias and 2 from Michal. Very informative.  I am finding some config not as ours though.  Am really interested in anyone has really implemented and used this in a prod environment.
    Regards,
    Keith

    I think I am exactly at the same position as you in figuring out the usage of FEH in an environment. I just completed a small document (for internal purpose) that I prepared gathering all the information from those blogs, SCN and TechEd. Here are my 2 cents:
    >>- how have you found it to work in real life?
    We haven't implemented it yet. But we believe it will be quite useful in handling business specific errors. We are trying to find out if it can be merged with the existing BPEM infrastructure to generate BPEM cases.
    >>- configuration/set-up straight-forward?
    Yes, the blogs should be quite useful to provide this information.
    >>- what scenarios have used it in?
    Most importantly it will be used for standard service implementation where we consume enterprise services from ES workplace. These services have FEH capability built in (they have FEH method implemented within). The scenarios are of course inbound abap proxy.
    >>- incorporated into your custom services?
    We are still in design phase. But if you ask me about it, i would say yes you can and I think you should use it for custom ones as well.
    Kind regards,
    Prateek Raj Srivastava

  • General error handling operation

    Hi,
    I did not find a comprehensive explanation how error handling works in TestStand, only bits and pieces about the callbacks (perhaps I looked at the wrong places).
    Anyway, I made some experiments with SequenceFilePostStepRuntimeError and StationPostStepRuntimeError - intentionally leaving out ProcessModelPostStepRuntimeError to reduce complexity - and came up with the attached flow chart. I would like to know:
    if that shows the correct operation of TestStand error handling (we are currently using 4.1, about to switch to 2010 or 2012, so it would also be interesting to know if anything changes with the new versions)
    if it is always the case that the combination of ErrorReported=True und Error.Occurred=True after the error handler leads to termination of the execution? I could not find any setting governing that (the "goto cleanup immediately" setting of the sequence was off;
    Best regards
    Peter
    Attachments:
    TestStand_ErrorHandling.png ‏36 KB

    Hi Peter,
    1) Every step has :
    error.code   - to set the error code
    error.occured - boolen if set true displays a popup error message to the user
    error.message - the popup contains this message
    when you set error.occured=true it will bring up a popup message with the error.message and error.code.
    Please note that this may not be acceptable in the manufacturing environment where operators may not be trained to check for errors.
    The general practice in manufacturing is to fail all important steps that errors out so that the final result is failed.Then do a offline analysis.This is done by step.results.status = "Failed".You can also populate step.results.ReportText with proper values so that your test report reflects the type of error/failure.
    2) Regarding the  SequenceFilePostStepRuntimeError and StationPostStepRuntimeError - they are optional error handling methods if you want to act on errors.
    3)Every step has an option ( look for properties-->post actions).On Pass or On fail destinations can be set for each step.Cleanup is always executed except in cases of abort.
    4) In the menu configure-->Station options-->execution there is an option for runtime errors ( one of them is run cleanup).
    Hope the above information helps.

  • How to implement general error handler in labview projects

    Thanks,

    Hello,
    You may also find these links useful:
    Custom Error Handling In LabVIEW
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/de​4f036f22c4b9f286256fee0010b6fd
    LabVIEW Introduction Course - Six Hours (has a section on error handling)
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/learningcenter.nsf/03f7​c60f17aad210862567a90054a26c/55974411828f779086256​...
    Hope this helps!
    Charlie S.
    Visit ni.com/gettingstarted for step-by-step help in setting up your system

  • General Labview Error Handler question discussion

    Recently two functions were brought to my attention, the General Error Handler and the Simple Error handler. 
    And I cannot wrap my hand around these two features.  While I have been using Labview I have always used the Labview error cluster.  When would you use these two features?  As I feel the cluster error is much help. 
    Maybe it is my defnition that I have confused: 
    The general error handler will display a dialogue box describing the error that will be passed and shuts down the code? 
    The simple error handler notifys the operator that an error has occured but it can be customized for adding functionality, it takes the error cluster input and determines if an error was generated.  "If an error has been generated, the VI displays a dialog box with the error code, a brief description of the error, and the location of the error."   How is this not the same as an error cluster?  
    If anyone has any simple code examples for this or knowledge I greatly appriciate it. 
    Caleb

    Jacobson wrote:
    Psireaper9 wrote:
    The simple error handler notifys the operator that an error has occured but it can be customized for adding functionality, it takes the error cluster input and determines if an error was generated.  "If an error has been generated, the VI displays a dialog box with the error code, a brief description of the error, and the location of the error."   How is this not the same as an error cluster?  
    You are correct that they give the same information.  The difference is that if you want to use an error cluster you will need an indicator on your front panel.  If you use the simple error handler you won't have to have an error cluster on your front panel but the user will be notified if an error does occur.
    Think about all the programs you normally use (excel, chrome, etc.).  As a user you expect that errors aren't happening, and if errors do occur then the application will usually just close out and you get an error dialog about the error.
    I use the simple error handler with no user interaction to extract the error text.  Is there an easier way of doing that?

  • LV7.1 Strange behavior with Automatic Error Handling occuring when it shouldn't [LV 7.1 Pro on WinXP for Tablet PC's]

    [LV 7.1 Pro on WinXP for Tablet PC's]
    I recently let a rather large LV app of mine run in the development environment while I was out for a couple of days. Upon returning I found that the app had hung for ~22 hours waiting for an answer to an Automatic Error Handling (AEH) dialog proclaiming an Error 7 in New File without any indication of the VI hierarchy that called New File.  I set about ensuring that AEH dialogs would not pop up and have not been able to discover how I could have possibly received one in the first place.
    Subsequent investigation revealed:
    Neither AEH option in Options>Block Diagrams were checked.
    Network problems had occurred around the time that the app had hung.  All file paths are network paths when running in the development environment, so the cause of the error was most likely valid, even if the AEH dialog appearance wasn't.
    My app has only one instance where the New File primitive is used by me. That subVI and all others above it in the hierarchy DO NOT have the AEH property enabled.  The error out cluster of New File in my subvi is wired.
    My app has three instances where New File is called from a vi.lib vi (Open/Create/Replace File.vi, Open Config Data.vi, and Prompt Web Browser Path.vi), none of which have the AEH property enabled.  Nor does any of their calling VI's.  All three instances also have their error out cluster wired.
    A utility to examine the AEH property of all VI's (with all top level and dynamic VI's loaded) in memory reported that only 1 of 308 vi's ( RGT Does File Exists.vi from the Report Generation Toolkit) had that property true.  That vi has no subVI's other than the File/Directory Info primitive and no calling VI's in common with any of the vi's that call New File, except a top level VI.
    As long as 'Enable automatic error handling dialogs' remains unselected in options>block diagram, I am unable to get an AEH dialog for either the New File or File/Directory Info primitives in a test VI with AEH property enabled and their error out clusters unwired no matter what invalid path I pass to the functions.  As soon as the options>block diagram>Enable AEH dialogs' is selected, both primitives fire AEH dialogs with no error out wired and don't when wired. i.e. works as advertised.
    In other words I can find no reason why I should have gotten the problem AEH dialog...
    I cannot afford for this app to hang because of a network problem, other portions of the app that were running concurrently correctly handled the error and, had the AEH dialog not appeared, the app would have made corrections or shutdown in an orderly fashion.
    Any ideas?

    Very good.
    Write Characters to File.vi>Open/Create/Replace File.vi>New File
    New File throws the error.  Open/Create/Replace strips the hierarchy from the source of the error.  Write Characters passes it to the General Error Handler.  I never looked above O/C/R file in the hierarchy except for enable automatic error handling property.  The tip-off should have been to realize that O/C/R file was stripping the hierarchy from the error and look above that. 
    The real irony is that Write Characters was being used to log error cluster data to an error log file...
    Save as... Copy without updating... the OEM 'Write Characters to File' is gone from this app.
    Thanx (a bunch)

  • Displaying errors when Enable automatic error handling option is on

    In order to display error messages do I need general or simple error handler to implement if I have Enable automatic error handling on?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Both will (optionally) display a popup when an error occurs. The general error handler just has more options for special cases. The simple error handler is typically sufficient.
    If you havce automatic error handing enabled, you'll get a popup whenever a function generates an error AND the error output is not wired. Once you wire an error handler, the automatic error handling will no longer occur.
    To display an error, you can also just place a plain error indicator on the front panel. This avoids annoying popup messages.
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Custom error handler examples and/or instruction

    I'm finishing up an application and would like to customize some of the error reporting.
    I've started playing around with the custom error handler VI's with some success. I would, however, like to see some examples from people who know what they are doing (unlike me).
    As always, your feedback is appreciated.
    Todd

    Look at this message.
    http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=45649
    Do a search for "General Error Handler" and you'll find some others.
    I'm also trying to find a simple way to define custom error codes and descriptions in an error cluster. I can produce my codes easily enough using the vi posted by Aristos Queue in the message noted above. I can also display my user-defined descriptions using a dialog, but I haven't found an easy way to make the user-defined descriptions in the array appear in the error cluster.
    Any help on this would be appreciated.
    Attachments:
    Error_Demo.vi ‏37 KB

  • Advanced Error handling

    Hi all,
    I am developing an error handling system for an extensive LabView application, unfortunately I can't  call it's purpose due to confidentiality.
    I just graduated for my university degree in Applied Physics, and therefore I am pretty experienced with LabVIEW (got core 1,2 and 3).
    The used synchonization technique is a queue-operated producer/consumer  handler. The testing set-up consists out of the following hardware:
    - Keithley 2700 multimeter
    - A Stanford SR830 Lock-in
    - PI-Mercury 863 (Z-stage controller, for moving up and down)
    - NI DAQ 6244
    My Question is:
    How can you make sure that you cover most errors with your error handling application? What would be a correct approach to find all possible errors that could occur during a measurement?
    For example: I could disconnect the K2700 and start the application, then a VISA error is most likely to occur. Besides that I could disconnect the power supply of the hardware and start the application and see which error would occur then.
    Is there some general kind of rule of thumb to find the possible errors which could occur in the set-up?
    Thanks for your reply in advance.
    Cheers,
    San
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Aha! Found it: https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-20726
    I think that was the presentation that I was trying to find earlier as it gives some information about actual strategies for dealing with errors and reporting them versus just how to wire up error wires and the general error handler.
    As for your reply, you need to think about grouping sections of code and say to yourself "what should happen if an error occurs here?". You will probably end up identifying gating points in your code (e.g. at the end of a case)
    As a couple of examples:
    - During initialisation, if a device fails to initialise, should you retry and if so, how many times before giving up? Should you let the user attempt to reconfigure the device
    - If you're using a queue based architecture and the reference gets destroyed
    You end up having to analyse your code and saying "What if....?" a lot!
    I think the errors boil down to something like the following:
    - Critical application errors: A terminal error caused by a software bug such as accidentally releasing a reference to a main message queue. In this case you have to shut-down the software but you should report or log some information to help you debug the issue remotely!
    - Device errors: Failed to initialise, device not present, lost connection, incorrect configuration - the software can't operate normally but maybe you could keep trying to re-initialise or allow the user to try to change settings rather than exit the application.
    - User errors: User has misconfigured something such as entered an invalid path or selecting an incorrect file (type, format etc.) - in this case you should probably notify the user and let them try again.
    - Known errors: errors that you expect might occur such as creating a folder that already exists - these would usually be ignored or handled in a case structure. Another example of this is errors out of 'close' subVIs in your exit case (the device might never have initialised or may have already shut down)
    You'll never be able to catch every single error (and it's not possible to see all errors a VI might produce and you may want to generate your own errors) but you should try to properly handle (& rectify) errors that are more likely to occur (such as lost connection to a device because someone tripped over a serial cable) and leave the other errors to your general handler.
    You also want to think about the experience for the end user of your software - something that the presentation linked above mentions. Chances are that the average user isn't going to be able to understand LabVIEW error codes and will be disappointed if the software just shuts down on launch because a device is missing. 
    There is no holy grail of error handling/reporting - it's something I'm always reading/learning about and try to apply that as much as I can in my applications!
    Certified LabVIEW Architect, Certified TestStand Developer
    NI Days (and A&DF): 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014
    NI Week: 2012, 2014
    Knowledgeable in all things Giant Tetris and WebSockets

  • General Inquiry Regarding Error Handling with System Exec.vi

    I have a sub vi that uses the System Exec.vi to send SMS messages when triggered. I am confused as to how the error handling works and why all of the errors seem to go to the "standard error" vs the "Error out". The reason I am interested is because I am trying to interrupt the error out of another script to execute a command if error=true.
    I have intentionally created an error to test this, however it does not seem that the signal is ever being sent to the error out, only to the standard error.
    Any help/explanation as to how this works would be greatly appreciated.

    The Facebook discussion board is just a pilot and that functionality is not available yet (as to my knowledge). You will have to use the actual forum thread to add attachments. You can click the arrow just to the right of thread topic in the Facebook thread and that will take you to the ni.com/forums thread. Or you can navigate here:
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/General-Inquiry-Regarding-Error-Handling-with-System-Exec-vi/m-p/246...
    Having a look at your VI would help to clarify the error handling issue.
    Daniel K | NI Applications Engineer | Certified LabVIEW Developer

  • General purpose Error Handler Routines

    While developing various applications we found out that error handling is one of the most important(at the same time one of the most ignored) task. so we decided to develop some modules which will allow us to configure the handling methods
    after develoment we think that this library can be useful to everyone, hence we are making it public
    please feel free to give your feedback, bug report, improvement ideas etc...
    you can also mail me at [email protected]
    Tushar Jambhekar
    [email protected]
    Jambhekar Automation Solutions
    LabVIEW Consultancy, LabVIEW Training
    Rent a LabVIEW Developer, My Blog
    Attachments:
    Error Handler.zip ‏367 KB

    Hello Tushar,
    Thanks for sharing your work on the forum. We really appreciate it.
    Regards,
    Chetan K
    Application Engineer
    National Instruments

  • Error handling in process chain-doubts

    Hi ,
    I have some doubts in error handling of process chains.
    1) I have  aprocess load infopackeage and subsequent process is update fromPSA.
    process load infopackage got failed  , so i loaded  the IP manually and repeated the next i.e process update from PSA .
    How to correct the process chain from now?
    2) I have  aprocess load infopackeage and subsequent process is Delete request in infocube .process load infopackage got failed  , so i loaded  the IP manually and repeated the next process i.e Delete request in infocube. Chain continued by deleting the right request . How this is possible ?
    Plz  help me  as this is urgent and daily i have to deal with this  issues. If any documents on error handling is greatly appreciated.
    My mail id is [email protected]
    Regards,
    Pavan

    Hi Pavan,
    Hope the following links will give u a clear idea about process chains and clear ur doubts.
    Business Intelligence Old Forum (Read Only Archive)
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/8f/c08b3baaa59649e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8da0cd90-0201-0010-2d9a-abab69f10045
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/19683495-0501-0010-4381-b31db6ece1e9
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/36693695-0501-0010-698a-a015c6aac9e1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9936e790-0201-0010-f185-89d0377639db
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3507aa90-0201-0010-6891-d7df8c4722f7
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/263de690-0201-0010-bc9f-b65b3e7ba11c
    /people/siegfried.szameitat/blog/2006/02/26/restarting-processchains
    Errors in monitoring of process chains can be categorized into 4 different sections...
    Master data - Full Update
    Master data - Delta Update
    Transaction data - Full Update
    Transaction data - Delta Update.. in terms of loading of data which can be due to server shut down or system maintenance... errors due to incorrect entries in the OLTP system in which case you'll have to fix the errors in the PSA and manually load the data...
    Otherwise it can have errors on Attribute change run being locked by some other job... Aggregate Roll up failing because of attribute change run being run at the same time... Problem with hierarchies and save hierarchies...
    There can be problems with the data store activation if the ODS object contains any incorrect request sitting inside it... then, you need to delete the incorrect request and reload the data again...
    In case of Transaction Delta failure, you'll have to request for a repeat either manually in the infopackage or using the repeat option if available on right clicking the load event...
    For Master Data Delta failures, you need to do an Re-init by deleteing the previous initalization condition in the "initalization option for source systems" in the menu scheduler or reschedule the enitre chain... because, master data generally do not support repeat of last delta ...
    U can even look into these links:
    /people/siegfried.szameitat/blog/2006/02/26/restarting-processchains
    For common data load errors check this link:
    /people/siegfried.szameitat/blog/2005/07/28/data-load-errors--basic-checks
    ****Assign Points if Helpful****
    Regards,
    Ravikanth.

  • Using code interface node with dll crashes LV 2011 but not LV 8.6... using max error handling does nothing

    Hi all,
    I'm having a peculiar problem.
    I inherited a project saved in LabVIEW 8.6. The project must use of particular dll that was built a few years ago. The original developer and source code for this .dll are long gone. The very core logic exists, in the form of embedded C code, and that's it. The .dll is called through a Code Interface Node in LV 8.6 and this setup manages to "work". Howver, running the VI that calls this .dll in LV 2011 causes an "insta crash", as in, no "program has stopped responding".  Error message pops up, then all LV windows close.
    It's very similar to that described in here:
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/D84C9775ABD921CF8625772A005CA50C
    but this KB says to try putting the amount of error handling to maximum. I tried that, but it didn't help. 
    Using the "Debug" option allows me to run the just-in-time debugger with CVI 2010, which then proceeds to say this:
    Finally, I manage to get this out of it: 
    FATAL RUN-TIME ERROR:   Unknown source position, thread id 0x000012D4:   A non-debuggable thread caused a 'General Protection' fault at address 0x00000000.
    I don't think that really helps at all, but it's there.
    Here is the function prototype of the .dll:
    void  _inputPM@224(uint8_t arg1, uint16_t arg2, uint8_t arg3, float arg4, float arg5, float arg6, float arg7, float arg8, float arg9, float arg10, float arg11, float arg12, float arg13, float arg14, float arg15, float arg16, float arg17, uint16_t arg18, uint16_t arg19, uint16_t arg20, uint16_t arg21, uint16_t arg22, uint16_t arg23, uint16_t arg24, uint16_t arg25, uint16_t arg26, float arg27, float arg28, float arg29, float arg30, float arg31, float arg32, float arg33, float arg34, float arg35, float arg36, float arg37, float arg38, float arg39, float arg40, float arg41, float arg42, float arg43, float arg44, float arg45, float arg46, float arg47, uint16_t arg48, uint16_t arg49, uint16_t arg50, uint16_t arg51, uint16_t arg52, float arg53, float arg54, float arg55, float arg56);
    (never seen a function take 50 input params like that (wouldn't you use a struct? array? something? But I digress, and I don't know anything about .dlls...))  
    I do have a ".lib" and a ".cdb" file with the same name as the .dll, but those also looks like some kind of compiled file. 
    I'm sure the answer I'm going to get is that there is no way of telling what's really going on without .dll source code. I'm hoping against hope that there may be another way or hack.
    Any ideas? Thank you for you help. 
    Regards,
    Mark G 
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    MarkCG wrote:
    Changing the call library node to stdcall (WINAPI) did the trick! No more crash. Thank you very much!
    I haven't run LV2011 on windows XP, only on windows 7, so I don't know if that makes a dfference. But  The call type makes no difference when using LV 8.6 on the same machine, however.
    Now I've got to make the .DLL run corretly on a compact fieldpoint....  and avoid crashing IT. 
    Thank you for the help all!
    Well, the DLL did work fine in LabVIEW 8.6 because earlier versions of LabVIEW automatically proceeded to change the calling convention to stdcall, if they noticed a function name decoration of @# (# = number of bytes passed on the stack) appended to the name. This is the default naming decoration for stdcall functions used by VisualC. However this decoration can be overwritten with linker switches, other compilers don't use them always in the same way, and most likely there are in the mean time compilers out there that can produce such decorations also for non stdcall calling convention. So this automagic trickery was removed from newer LabVIEW versions.
    I do think it could be considered a bug in the code that upgrades LabVIEW VIs, that it uses the calling convention that is configuerd in the dialog, instead of the calling convention earlier LabVIEW versions used automagically, but it is an esoteric corner case.
    What Compact Fieldpoint controller do you have? If it's anything newer than 20xx or 21xx forget it. The 22xx controllers use a PPC CPU and VxWorks operating system and can never get a Windows DLL to operate properly. If it is a 20xx controller it's still highly likely that DLL can not even get loaded into LabVIEW as it likely relies on other runtime libraries and possibly Win32 APIs not present in the Pharlap ETS runtime kernel used on those controllers.
    There is a tool to check a DLL for incompatible imports that are not present on specific ETS RT systems. And this list summarizes the RT system used on the various NI controllers.
    Rolf Kalbermatter
    CIT Engineering Netherlands
    a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mac mini bloqué au démarrage sur écran blanc

    J,'ai eu un message me disant que opéra devait redémarrer, mais rien ne se passait. Je éteint et redémarrer mon Mac et maintenant il bloque sur un écran blanc. Merci pour votre aide

  • I am using Firefox.  I am unable to upgrade

    I am using forefox, and am unable to upgrade.  What do I do.

  • Issue with GP getting into Erroneous State

    Hi Experts I have an issue with GP Process getting into Erroneous State. We have a series of steps in the Guided Procedure Process. The process instance passes a few of the initial steps in the procedure and getting struck at a particular step and le

  • Creation profile required field

    Hello, How can I define the field creation profile in the scheduling agreement as a required field?it is not possible via the customizing of the screenlayout. Regards, Sofia

  • Is the new simcity compatible with any of the macbook pros

    The case for the game doesnt have any information for macbooks or anything for apple but only for windows so i was just wondering if i can just buy the game and play it on a 2011 macbook pro because thats all i have i also played diablo 3 on my macbo