General task (inconsistency SOBJ error)

Hi Experts,
I have the following issue.
When I am trying to make the tasks in my workflow as 'Genreal Task'(Edit>Attributes>GeneralTask), I am getting
the following message.
'Please check the order's object list (inconsistency SOBJ)'.
I are able to continue with the process despite this message and its setting the Agent assignment on task
properties 'green'.
When we test the workflow the task is not getting assigned to any agent even if the agent is workflow initiator.
Has any body has encountered this kind of issue? Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks
K.Sreenivas

Which business object are you using in that workflow step..?
Can you try the agent assignment with a standard bus. obj & let us know what happens..?
Also as mentioned above ensure that SWU3 customisation is correctly done..
Regards,
Bharath

Similar Messages

Error loading file in the operation long text in the General task list

Hi all,
I couldnt upload the detailed check lists in the operations (operation tab) of the general task lists through the long text uplaod via Text->Upload->RTF---> .System is throwing the following Information...
1.Error loading file " specified path with filename.rtf"
Could you please give me any idea to eliminate this.The client is having the detailed check list for each and every operation with safety measures to be taken.
Plz help.
Regards,
Suresh.

Hi all,
It was an authorisation object missing and the problem got solved.
Regards,
Suresh.

General Task Error although Agent is found

Hi,
I have a little puzzle that I cannot figure out: I have a rule for a general task. The rule finds the agent for the task. However, there seems to be a error when the task is sent to the agents inbox. Due to the fact that it is a general task it is sent to everyones inbox. Since it is not the rule that is failing, I am wondering how I can avoid the task to go to everyones inbox. I have checked the "Terminate if Rule Resolution has no Result" in the rule.
Please help!
/Elvez

Hi,
As u said "Terminate if Rule Resolution has no Result" is there in rule but can u tell me that, is the check box for is clicked or not, If it's clicked and your if your rule will fail then definately it will send workitem to every one's inbox,
But to avoid this there is someting call as secondery priority in responsibilty based rule. where you can maintain one more responsibilty with some default users and some globle condition in it ..
Ex .. If your promary rule is having some parameter
costcenter = 100.
user = A.
costcenter = 200.
user = B.
costcenter = 300.
user = C.
with 99 priorty .
and it's getting fails caz of input provided by wf cointainer (i.e. 301) ..
then you can maintain one default role
costcenter = 0 to 400.
user = D.
with 01 priorty .
So first rule will goto higher priorty and if it ll fail then it wil not go to error and also consider secondery priorty and give default agent maintained in it..
Regards
Dev.

Please check the order's object list (inconsistency SOBJ)

Hi Friends;
I am facing a strange issue where I have copied a custom task from SAP standard decision task 00008267 caz I needed to perform some custom requirement on it.
I have done evry thing but then I have observed that Agent assignment is not coming at testing client which is on same server.
I also can not modify any thing at testing client.
So I performed SCC1 from testing client and check but still same issue.
Then I thought of re assigning agent at development client but while making it general task it pop up the message "Please check the order's object list (inconsistency SOBJ)".
And after again performing the SCC1 still the issue exist.
Can any one suggest their inputs where the problem could be and how should I fix it.
Regards
Devraj

Hi Dev,
Can you please share more details? Agent assignment not coming means?
Have you set the task as General in testing client?
Thanks,
Viji.

Task properties - General task - Partner profile

Hi Experts,
I'm using user decision step for manager approval, and in development server i've selected task as general task in task properties and everything was working fine in development server.
When above workflow development transported to testing server, the task properties are not transported. So, agent assignment is de-activated. And when i'm trying to set general task attribute in task properties, its saying "Entry in outbound table not found" error message. Can anyone help me in resolving this.
Entry in outbound table not found
Message no. E0400
Diagnosis
No partner profile (outbound parameter) could be found using the following key:
DC1CLNT10/LS//HRMD_ABA///
This refers to the key fields in table EDP13:
RCVPRN Partner number
RCVPRT Partner type
RCVPFC Partner function
MESTYP Logical message
MESTYP Message code
MESCOD Message function
TEST Test indicator
Thanks in advance,
Siva Sankar.

Hi Siva,
I have always found that I need to go make change the agent assignment on custom tasks to 'General' as the workflows get transported - or you can investigate here:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/d00a1cb4-913c-2c10-d991-caf663ab9b16&overridelayout=true
As Jocelyn Dart has said:
Folks, This is an oldie but a goodie.
You need to execute program RHMOVE30 to add your General Task settings to Transports.
Enter your task numbers (you can enter a workflow and use eval path TASK_HIER to pick up all sub tasks) Select the Transport checkbox
On the second screen
Select all and press Add to Transport
Select all again and press Transport/Delete
You should get a message confirming they have been added to your change request.
You will see infotype 1217 entries on your transport request.
However your issue seems to be a different one. I searched and it looks as though you need to check partner profiles using WE20? Have you tried this?
Hope this helps,
Sue

Regarding LSMW upload for General Tasks

I am trying to upload a task header & item data i.e.PLKO & PLPO.
For that I am using the standard LSMW object 0170 which is called <b>Routing</b>. But at the time of creating Batch Input session i am getting error
No profile with entry tool for task list A 1 in session MPLAN_LOAD.
So can anybody explain what is this all about.
Or is there any convinient way apart from BDC to create General task along with multiple operations.

You can try to load data using the IDOC method
Message type : ROUTING_CREATE
IDOC method works well for many complicated loads.
Regards
Vivek
reward points if this helps

Agent determination of 'general' task fails....

I have a task in the workflow which i have kept as general task
I have attached a rule to it.
when the rule doesnt return any agents, the workitem is sent to all the SAP users
this is a very big problem, could you please suggest how to prevent that ?
if the rule doesnt give any agents then the workflow should hang, it should go to all the SAP users.
thanks and regards,
Dipti

Hi Imthiaz,
I have already checked the workflow log and I know very well why my workflow is in error.
My requirement is that even if the workflow goes into error, this message entry should not be created.
As per my knowledge, this is created in workflow administrators inbox due to setting in SWU3 -- Schedule Background Job for Work Items with Errors
But it doesnt look like the above settings effects this message creation. There should be some setting somwhere right ?
Also, it is only in quality system not dev
Dev -- workflow goes in error -- no message seen
QA -- workflow goes in error -- message seen in workflow initiators inbox
please help.....
thank you
regards
Dipti
Edited by: dipti on May 6, 2008 6:30 PM

I have assigned standard task as General Task in agent assignment but why there is a red flag beside the agent assignment property in task property like the image below?

I have assigned standard task as General Task in agent assignment but why there is a red flag beside the agent assignment property in task property like the image below?

Hi Atiq
Now that's concerning.....!!!
This error usually shows up when the workflow is not able to resolve the outcome of the decision....no branch is there for the selected decision.
Since, the standard workflow is also going in an error....this is something wrong...
Did anyone play around with the standard decision task?
I am not sure if this will help, try generating the task and standard workflow by executing the FM SWD_WFD_REPLICATE_FROM_9999 from SE37 directly. First, generate the task (give full task ID TS00008267 as the input and execute; and then the standard verification workflow in the next exec).
Try and test again...if this works, generate your custom workflow again like this.
The above is a pure guess and I am not sure if this will work.
Regards,
Modak

General task list External no range ( Masking)

Hi
Our client want to use external no range for general task list and want to restrict the group name as aaa-0000 ( first 3 charcters and '-' 4 numaric ) . when creating a task list if the user enters in some other format ( all characters ) it is accepting .
My question is can we restrict this like edit mask in Functional location. If user try to create task list group in some other format it should give error message .
Thanks in advance
Gangadhar

Hi,
there is no masking like in functional locations, however you can define number range for external numbering for task lists.
You can also set authorizations for creating task lists.
Hope it helps..

General task list: component selection from BOM - possible in batch input?

Hi experts,
for the assignment of non-stock material to general task lists I have followed the advice from message[6115684|Re: General Task List Components;.
So what I have done is:
- Include non-stock material in BOM
- Assign BOM to general task list header
When clicking on the "Component selection" button in the task list components, I can select a component.
When entering the material number of the component directly though, I get an error: "Material type X and line item type L not compatible" (CO135).
I would like to upload the general task lists with a batch input recording, but I can't figure out how to select components.
Any thoughts?
Kind regards,
Andreas

Hello,
We have the same requirement to load tasklists (change & create). We are using the function modules EAM_TASKLIST_CREATE and EAM_TASKLIST_CHANGE. However, i cannot get a non-stock BOM item to process. Has anyone got this working?
Thanks,
Clay.
EDIT: Found the answer - simply fill in the fields for BOM on the component (STLTY, STLNR, STLKN, and STLAL).
Message was edited by: Clayton Mergen

Since switching to Firefox this week, when I click on a hyperlink in an e-mail in Outlook, I get this message, "General failure. An error occurred in sending the command to the application." It doesn't open a new window or do anything.

Since switching to Firefox this week, when I click on a hyperlink in an e-mail in Outlook, I get this message, "General failure. An error occurred in sending the command to the application." It doesn't open a new window or do anything. Any work around to fix this?

See this lnk for a fix, it worked for me!
http://www.pcworld.com/article/200103/fix_outlook_general_failure_error_for_email_links.html

Inconsistent datatypes error when inserting into a object

I am trying to insert some test data into the table emp.I have managed to succesfully create the objects and types but when I try to insert into the emp table I get a inconsistent datatypes error however I have checked the datatypes and they all seem fine. Can anyone help me.
thanks
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE Address_T AS object
(ADDR1                VC2_40,
ADDR2               VC2_40,
CITY_TX          VC2_40,
COUNTY_CD          VC2_40,
POST_CD          VC2_40);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE PERSON_T AS OBJECT (
LNAME_TX           NAME_T,
FNAME_TX           NAME_T,
BIRTH_DATE          DATE,
TELEPHONE          VC2_20,
EMAIL               VC2_40);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE EMP_T AS OBJECT (
EMP_ID     NUMBER (10),
PERSON     PERSON_T,
ADDRESS ADDRESS_T,
HIRE_DATE DATE)
CREATE TABLE EMP OF EMP_T
(EMP_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY);
INSERT INTO EMP VALUES (1,
PERSON_T('PETCH',
'GAVIN',
'23-JAN-80',
'(01964)550700',
'[email protected]'),
ADDRESS_T('67 CANADA',
'WALKINGTON',
'BEVERLEY',
'EAST YORKSHIRE',
'HU17 7RL'),
'11-FEB-02'
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes

Gavin,
What is your VC2_40 and NAME_T type definition? Your insert used these as varchar2, which is a built-in type not a user-defined type. If you explicitly define these to be varchar2's, the insert statement works fine.
Regards,
Geoff
I am trying to insert some test data into the table emp.I have managed to succesfully create the objects and types but when I try to insert into the emp table I get a inconsistent datatypes error however I have checked the datatypes and they all seem fine. Can anyone help me.
thanks
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE Address_T AS object
(ADDR1                VC2_40,
ADDR2               VC2_40,
CITY_TX          VC2_40,
COUNTY_CD          VC2_40,
POST_CD          VC2_40);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE PERSON_T AS OBJECT (
LNAME_TX           NAME_T,
FNAME_TX           NAME_T,
BIRTH_DATE          DATE,
TELEPHONE          VC2_20,
EMAIL               VC2_40);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE EMP_T AS OBJECT (
EMP_ID     NUMBER (10),
PERSON     PERSON_T,
ADDRESS ADDRESS_T,
HIRE_DATE DATE)
CREATE TABLE EMP OF EMP_T
(EMP_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY);
INSERT INTO EMP VALUES (1,
PERSON_T('PETCH',
'GAVIN',
'23-JAN-80',
'(01964)550700',
'[email protected]'),
ADDRESS_T('67 CANADA',
'WALKINGTON',
'BEVERLEY',
'EAST YORKSHIRE',
'HU17 7RL'),
'11-FEB-02'
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes

Failed to run task sequence. Error occurred while starting the task sequence (0x8007000E)

Hi there
Patch Tuesday yesterday (10th June2014). As always we deploy new patches first to a test collection where Windows 7 updates automatically apply.
Upon trying to rebuild any of the machines in this test collection, we were presented with the following error message:
Failed to run task sequence. Error occurred while starting the task sequence (0x8007000E)
After searching about this, I found this page from Niall Brady, which explained the problem:
http://www.niallbrady.com/2013/05/17/after-selecting-a-task-sequence-in-configuration-manager-2012-sp1-you-receive-threadtoresolveandexecutetasksequence-failed-code0x8007000e-in-smsts-log/
So I removed some of the machines from the test Windows update collection, and as per the advice in the above link, the error was gone and those machines could be built successfully.
So the problem is there were too many many policies downloaded (apps, packages and most of all updates) for the task sequence ram to store, hence the error.
Now...
...I have a question.
The next logical step to my mind is to patch our OS image with all missing patches, so these do not have to be downloaded at build time. Niall mentions this as one of the resolutions to this issue.
However there seems to be some confusion over whether this would actually make a difference.
I read through this link:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7e597b44-2586-4063-b6d0-cec48a7c11c7/sccm-2012-task-sequence-failure-0x8007000e?forum=configmanagerosd
There's seems to be no consensus on this.
Is SCCM 2012 clever enough to - when the task sequence is first started - to download ONLY the updates (policies) it detects as NOT present in the OS image...
or
Will it simply try to download policies for ALL items deployed to it, whether the updates are present in the OS image or not?
I will be disappointed if SCCM 2012 SP1 CU2 isn't clever enough to only download policies at build time for the apps, packages and updates it detects as needed.
I'd be grateful for some clarity on this.
Regards,
John, Glasgow.

Hi Jason
Thank you for replying, I appreciate it.
1) We currently have 15 or 16 software update groups for Office updates, dating back a month or two. The latest software update group contains all the patches in the previous software update groups plus the patches released on 10th June. Do you recommend
deleting all but the latest software update group?
2) I'm almost reluctant to ask this, but based on what you have advised, is it the case that when the task sequence executes, it will download policies for each update in each software update group regardless of whether it has already downloaded a policy
for an update in a previous software update group? So in effect it's downloading policies (for updates) it has already downloaded?
3) I'm not clear on why there would be no policy for an image; in Niall Brady's informative page on the 8007000E error, he writes the following:
"The reason it has run of space could be due to four possibilites: too many applications, too many Windows updates, too many Task Sequence steps, too many referenced packages'.
Can you shed some light on why there isn't a policy for an image?
Thanks again for replying,
John.

Problem with numbering of general task lists by creation thru LSMW - (IA05)

I'm using a sequencial file to create general task list thru LSMW (Object 0490 which corresponds to TCode IA05).
The numbering range for general task list groups is internal. I executed batch input and it works pretty well with the first general task list group, but every next fails, because the number of the previousy created task list stays in the user buffer and apears in the PLNNR field, so the system assumes I'm trying to create a new group counter instead of new general task list group.
I explicitely set IBIPTLST-PLNNR = '' in field mapping - still the same problem. I also set user parameter PLN to be empty in SU3 and still no luck. I even turned off the historic data in local data tab of SAPGui, but the problem persist.
Can anyone tell me how can I achieve it without changing the numbering range to external?

Hi,
From IBIP Help:
Initial fields
As a general rule, initial fields in structures are not transported into the corresponding screen field. In other words, fields that are blank are ignored. If you explicitly want to reset a field to the value "<blank>", you must mark the field in the batch input structure with the value !. This is the reset indicator, and means that a field is to be reset to its initial value.
Try setting IBIPTLST-PLNNR to !
-Paul

Fatal two-task communication protocol error (when using db link)

I have created the db link betwen two databases of oracle version 9i 9.0.2
the db link connects to specific user
when i access the table with same name as user then recieve following message
ORA-03106: fatal two-task communication protocol error
when i access the other tables having different name that the user to which the db link connects
that works alright
so what is solution of problem in this particular case?

What is your Oracle release? Is it 9.0.1.2 or 9.2.0?
What version of Sql*Plus client are you using?

General task (inconsistency SOBJ error)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for