Giving Access for an User On One Schema.

Hi all,
I want to give read,write and execute access for an user in one schema and only read access to another two users.
How can I give..Please suggest.

Hi,
Well in that case you may have to give the select privilege to a particular user for all tables.
Or
You may like to create two roles, and give select privilege to a particular role for all tables. And give write i.e. insert/update privilege to the other role. Then assign this role to the user whom you like to give the access.
Regards
Anurag Tibrewal.

Similar Messages

In Powerdesigner repository, can we limit access for any user to one particular model?

Hi
I have this requirement in Powerdesigner repository to setup a user and give him/her access to check in and check out only one model? In otherwords, when he logs into repostiory, he can't see any other folders except the folder that was assigned to him?
Is there a way to do this in the Powerdesigner tool.?
thank you
Krishna

Sure,
I have this requirement in Powerdesigner repository to setup a user and when he logs into repostiory, he can't see any other folders except the folder that was assigned to him?
Step #1
a) Connect as ADMIN
b) In Menu go to Repository=>Administration=>Users
c) Add user MYUSER
Step #2
a) In the Repository define a folder, example MYFOLDER
b) Right click on the folder MYFOLDER
c) Select folder permission and add MYUSER to MYFOLDER and give permission WRITE access
Step #3
a) Log into the repository by using your new user MYUSER
b) Check-in a model under MYFOLDER
b) Go to Repository : As you can see you can access models under the folder MYFOLDER
c) You can see others folders (Because by default all folders are displayed as "List" for all users (PUBLIC) but your user MYUSER can't see the objects contained into the others folders.
Bye
Do not forget to give your appreciation relative to my answer.

IW32- order-print is giving error for particular User.

Dear Friends,
IW32- order-print is giving error for particular User and output type. Debugging authorization restricted on the system, hence I canu2019t trace out the problem. If anybody comes across such issues, please reply to the post.
Thanks In Advance for your reply.
Anil Dasari
Thanks In Advance.

Hi,
Information about dump:
1. User and Transaction:
Runtime Errors         MESSAGE_TYPE_X
Date and Time          06.05.2011 10:47:40
     MM Used. 13116304
     MM Free. 3639760
User and Transaction
     Client.............. 700
     User................ "BLADEF01"
     Language key........ "N"
     Transaction......... "IW32 "
     Transactions ID..... "4DC387ECA12B684DE10000001A5B1803"
     Program............. "/MRSS/SAPLRSG_PM_ORDER"
     Screen.............. "SAPLCOIH 3000"
     Screen line......... 33
Information on where terminated
     Termination occurred in the ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRSG_PM_ORDER" - in
      "/MRSS/RSG_MAINTAIN_MRS".
     The main program was "SAPLCOIH ".
     In the source code you have the termination point in line 441
     of the (Include) program "/MRSS/LRSG_PM_ORDERU04".
2. Info. Where it got terminated.
Information on where terminated
    Termination occurred in the ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRSG_PM_ORDER" - in
     "/MRSS/RSG_MAINTAIN_MRS".
    The main program was "SAPLCOIH ".
    In the source code you have the termination point in line 441
    of the (Include) program "/MRSS/LRSG_PM_ORDERU04".
3. How to correct the error.
How to correct the error
    Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
    If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
    find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
    If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
    keywords:
    "MESSAGE_TYPE_X" " "
    "/MRSS/SAPLRSG_PM_ORDER" or "/MRSS/LRSG_PM_ORDERU04"
    "/MRSS/RSG_MAINTAIN_MRS"
    If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
    notification to SAP, include the following information:
    1.1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
       To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
    (Unconverted)".
    2.2. Corresponding system log
       Display the system log by calling transaction SM21.
       Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes
    after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File
    (Unconverted)".
    3.3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP.
I have been searching for notes recently implemented for IW32.
Thanks and Regards,
ANIL DASARI

SM20 logs for multiple users in one go.

I have to extract log for more than 100 users by using SM20 log.
I tried with wild card characters, it is not giving accurate user list.
Is there a way to paste 100 users at one time in SM20 tcode to pull the all users audit log instead of getting each user.

Good...
It shows the all users log report for current application server,but not all apps. server.
I have 7 application server but it shows the currenty apps server logson details.
Is it possible to get all application server logs details for all users in one go.

Can VI server automatically close access for clients' VIs, if one of clients is already connected?

Can VI server automatically close access for clients' VIs, if one of clients is already connected? and when first client closed reference, open access for other clients' VIs? I mean like when you use web publishing tools. If one user already uses front panel.. other just can wait until first one will finish.

Please stick to one thread. Here is the original.

How do I set Firefox to be usable for all users on one computer?

How do I set Firefox to be usable for all users on one computer?

I would think the about:config entries discussed are ex-factory set to values each user has to change individually, after the installation has run its course. The solution could be to have patched files ready to install post factum:
[https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences A Brief Guide to Mozilla Preferences - MDN]

How to create an default profile for every user on one machine? Deployment of configurations?

On firefox 3.5.X i can copy an configured profile from an user-folder to the programm folder of firefox. \mozilla firefox\defaults\profiles.
After an new user log in to the machine the default profile will get the actual profile of the new user. With all bookmarks, configurations and so on.
But this doesn't work with the firefox 3.6.10? What changed? What will be the way i can get an default configuration for every user on one machine? I want to deploy the firefox with an default configuration in our enterprise? Why does the behaviour change?
What to do?
Thanks...

No - there are no missing data, because nothing will be copied. The profile - folder does not work.
There are the standard first start behavior.
There might be another trick? Hint? Todo?
Thanks.

How to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages for some users and allow the access for some users?

I have a requirement to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages for some of the users and allow the access for some of the users.
I have applied the below code on the web.config file but this modification impacting only on the web application level not on the site collection and sub site level.
<location path="_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx">
    <system.web>
      <authorization>
        <deny users="*" />
      </authorization>
    </system.web>
</location>
<location path="_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx">
    <system.web>
      <authorization>
        <deny users="*" />
      </authorization>
    </system.web>
</location>
When I tried the access on
:<portno>/sites/<scname>/_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx">http://<servername>:<portno>/sites/<scname>/_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx page allowed the access for all users.
Please suggest the possible solution to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages on SharePoint2013.
Thanks
Ramasubbu

You can't do it from OOTB.
_layout folder is accessible to the users if they have read access in any of the site even subsite.
You can modify *.aspx file, add your custom control which will check user.
[custom.development]

HELP needed on Remote Management set to allow access for all users

my mac mini snow leopard server runs in a data center and i use screen sharing to interact with it. i played with the sharing settings remotely yesterday and changed "allow access for" to all users. i was disconnected immediately and i couldn't logon again. i have no luck changing to other users. i don't want to make a special trip to the center to change it back to whatever it used to be. i can still use afp to connect but the screen sharing option is no longer available. what does "allow access for all users" mean anyway?
thanks!

As its name implies, allow access for all should allow any valid user account to access the server. I'm not sure why it's no longer working. It almost sounds like the ARDAgent crashed.
Either way there's a command-line interface to the ARD preferences:
/System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/Resources/ki ckstart
man kickstart discusses the options, including examples of how to enable access for specific users.

Restricting Access for SQ01 User Group

Hi ,
Please let me how to Restrict Access for a User Group to only some of the specific users?
Thank you
Edited by: Vibhor Arora on Apr 12, 2010 7:29 AM

Hi,
Can you please clarify what exactly you want to know, your request can be interpreted in a few different ways.
If you are concerned that people have access to all user groups, then you need to remove access to S_QUERY activity 02 and I think activity 23. They will lose access to all user groups that they are not assigned to via SQ03.

How to Automate to Add a Role for 250+ Users in One Shot ?

Hi all,
How can I add a Role 'X' for 250+ User in one shot. I could go to SU01 for each User and add a Role 'X' manually, but it will take at least more than two hours. Is there any automation to accomplish this task, PLEASE ?
Thanks.

Look at the How To paper on maintaining authorizations through flat file...
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1d8ea990-0201-0010-43b3-d13b83e2bf20">How to maintain authorizations through flat file</a>
Hope this helps.

How to limit file access for different users in 10.7.4 Server

We had everything working perfectly with an earlier version of Lion Server. The update to 10.7.3, or 4, seems to have opened access to all files for all users. Much to our surprise, this wide-open access started without warning.
- We have an external drive that contains all of the company's archives
- We had set access for one employee to get to the files he needs, and different access for another employee. Neither saw sharepoints outside of their access settings.
After an update, each employee can see and log in to all sharepoints. There doesn't seem to be a way to limit access for each employee now. I can set 'read' access for one employee, but it doesn't stop the other employee from accessing that sharepoint/folder.
Is there some new way to go about this? Or is something simply broken with the current release?

That is good to know. If the file share is seeing the drive and ignoring its permissions, that is why everyone can see everything. I have found, in Lion Server, that it is best to get the permissions set before turning on File Sharing. I don't know if you have the luxury of turning the file share off for a little while, but I would unshare the drive and see if the issue persists if you plug the external drive into another machine. The settings for permissions are set on the file or folder itself, so the issue should follow you to the other machine.
Again, if you can, I would unshare the drive and reshare it with the permissions that you want and turn file sharing back on. However, if you can get the drive to respect permissions rather than ignoring them, I think it will save you a lot of work.

PO delivery date field to be made display for all users except one user

Hi All,
I have a specific requirement:
The delivery date field in PO should be made display only at the time of changing the PO. I know pretty well that this can be achieved thru Define Screen Layout at document level, which inturn will make this field disaply mode to all users.
But it should be in changeable mode only for one user. how can we achieve this.
Any ideas, please
/R
Antony

Hi ,
You can create a authorization object(Z one) which can be assigned to the user id who need authorization of change .
In the exit , you can specify the logic that if SY-USER (current user) has the authorization id , the system will allow to change . If the user doesn't have the object in his roles , the system would not allow to change .
This will help in providing / removing access to any user id .
Regards,
Hari.

[SOLVED] Partition & Access for different users

Hey guys, I’m kind of lost and need some help.
Scenario:
My computer is set up with two hard drives: one SSD, which holds Arch and the /home folder, and a regular HDD, which holds the /var folder and where all data should go on two separate partitions.
Both partitions are mounted at /mnt/HDD2 and /mnt/HDD3.
Naturally, they both belong to root. However, since I want to be able to save all my music, games and whatnot on these two partitions I need to be able to access them as a normal user. On a single user system that would be a no-brainer; I would simply change the ownership. However, I plan to have another user use my computer from time to time and thus need to have the partitions accessible not only for one but a second user as well. And that’s where I can’t get things to work.
First I’ve changed the group for the partition (users) and added both users to the corresponding group (users) but could not write on the partition.
Then I’ve run chmod a+rxw on the partition. Beside the fact that I think that this is quite an inelegant solution, newly created folders where still only accessible by the corresponding user.
I’ve also set the SGID-Bit but no dice either.
Now I’m totally lost. Obviously, I’m missing something but I don’t see what.
tl;dr: I need access to a partition for different users on a single system so that they can easily save, write and share files between each other.
Any help appreciated.
Last edited by Janusz11 (2014-10-03 12:32:58)

Problem solved.
I ended up using umask. It's basically a single user system anyway with a second user only using it from time to time and both of us having their own group. So it should be relatively save using umask.
I've changed the owner and group of the partition:
chown user1:group /mnt/HDD
...and the permissions:
chmod 2770 /mnt/HDD
...and added both users to the corresponding group of the partition:
gpasswd -a user1 group
gpasswd -a user2 group
Finally I've changed umask to 007 for each individual user while leaving the system-wide umask untouched.

How do you limit TOC navigation for multiple users on one computer?

If you have 5 Adobe Captivate 5.5. Projects linked together to play consecutively how can you set up a TOC so that each new user starts from the beginning and can only go back to slides that the new user has viewed? We have the TOC set to Enable Navigation, Navigate Visited Slides Only, and View Status Flag. This is a required training video that will be taken by many users. We need them to be able to go back to the sections that they already viewed but not be able to see the sections that others have already watched. In other words, we don't want them to be able to advance ahead to the sections that the previous test takers have viewed.
Message was edited by: DOLOnlineTrainers
Problems:
•     Remove the TOC and they have no navigation abilities to see something they may have missed
•     Keep it in and the viewer can advance to parts they have not viewed as the previous user set the ability
•     Put a back button in and they can only go back one at a time and have no ability to get back to where they were if they keep hitting back other than watch over
•     Tried the clear button in TOC under status flag which clears the status flags yet it only works on one section at a time and does not clear all linked projects
•     Is there something we are missing? Tried reading blogs and really can’t pinpoint problem

To get each user to have a different experience when viewing the content, you need to have some way for each user to be uniquely identified, otherwise the browser has no way of knowing that THIS is not the same person that was looking at the content an hour ago. The way this is normally achieved is by getting users to log in as a different profile.
There's no EASY way I can think of to achieve what you want WITHOUT users having different profiles. You would need to get some custom HTML programming done by someone that basically mimicked separate browser sessions under the same login. It's theoretically possible, but I've never been required to do anything like this.

Giving Access for an User On One Schema.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for