In Powerdesigner repository, can we limit access for any user to one particular model?
Hi
I have this requirement in Powerdesigner repository to setup a user and give him/her access to check in and check out only one model? In otherwords, when he logs into repostiory, he can't see any other folders except the folder that was assigned to him?
Is there a way to do this in the Powerdesigner tool.?
thank you
Krishna
Sure,
I have this requirement in Powerdesigner repository to setup a user and when he logs into repostiory, he can't see any other folders except the folder that was assigned to him?
Step #1
a) Connect as ADMIN
b) In Menu go to Repository=>Administration=>Users
c) Add user MYUSER
Step #2
a) In the Repository define a folder, example MYFOLDER
b) Right click on the folder MYFOLDER
c) Select folder permission and add MYUSER to MYFOLDER and give permission WRITE access
Step #3
a) Log into the repository by using your new user MYUSER
b) Check-in a model under MYFOLDER
b) Go to Repository : As you can see you can access models under the folder MYFOLDER
c) You can see others folders (Because by default all folders are displayed as "List" for all users (PUBLIC) but your user MYUSER can't see the objects contained into the others folders.
Bye
Do not forget to give your appreciation relative to my answer.
Similar Messages
-
Giving Access for an User On One Schema.
Hi all,
I want to give read,write and execute access for an user in one schema and only read access to another two users.
How can I give..Please suggest.Hi,
Well in that case you may have to give the select privilege to a particular user for all tables.
Or
You may like to create two roles, and give select privilege to a particular role for all tables. And give write i.e. insert/update privilege to the other role. Then assign this role to the user whom you like to give the access.
Regards
Anurag Tibrewal. -
Business Customer - How can I limit data for employees / users?
Hello,
I am a small business customer and I would like to put a data cap on our company cell phones. Each has an iphone 6 which doesn't have great apps to auto limit data and such after reaching a certain limit. I know Verizon has some services that can do this for the personal accounts but I don't understand why this is not available to the business customers. Sure, I can have them pay for their overages but I would rather just give them a set amount to use and have it stop at that point. Wifi would always be available.
DDDHow many emails are we talking about per day? If these are just text emails they should not be taking much more space than just downloading the header would take. Are they a few paragraphs or several pages long?
If they contain attachments, such as pictures, they will take much more room but it should limit how much is loaded and give you an option for downloading the rest of that email.
I asked my neighbor how many emails she gets per day and she said about 20 - 25 and she stays well within her 200Mb.
If you are getting more than this then you really can't afford a smartphone and if you are within your return period you should immediately do so. And I did read your thread.
I'm not sure what purpose there would be to getting headers only. If that is the case get people to text you instead.
As for your suggestion to Apple, send it here: http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html
Message was edited by: deggie -
How to limit file access for different users in 10.7.4 Server
We had everything working perfectly with an earlier version of Lion Server. The update to 10.7.3, or 4, seems to have opened access to all files for all users. Much to our surprise, this wide-open access started without warning.
- We have an external drive that contains all of the company's archives
- We had set access for one employee to get to the files he needs, and different access for another employee. Neither saw sharepoints outside of their access settings.
After an update, each employee can see and log in to all sharepoints. There doesn't seem to be a way to limit access for each employee now. I can set 'read' access for one employee, but it doesn't stop the other employee from accessing that sharepoint/folder.
Is there some new way to go about this? Or is something simply broken with the current release?That is good to know. If the file share is seeing the drive and ignoring its permissions, that is why everyone can see everything. I have found, in Lion Server, that it is best to get the permissions set before turning on File Sharing. I don't know if you have the luxury of turning the file share off for a little while, but I would unshare the drive and see if the issue persists if you plug the external drive into another machine. The settings for permissions are set on the file or folder itself, so the issue should follow you to the other machine.
Again, if you can, I would unshare the drive and reshare it with the permissions that you want and turn file sharing back on. However, if you can get the drive to respect permissions rather than ignoring them, I think it will save you a lot of work. -
Hi,
I've created a third product level called "partner" other than the two that come as standard.
I'm running through the process of taking an existing user from the starter product to the partner product, and am subscribing the user to partner before removing the starter subscription. There seems no problem with a user having both a starter and unlimited
subscription, but am getting the following error when subscribing to partner.
"Subscriptions limit reached for same user"
This is using a subscriptions put. The same code works fine when upgrading to unlimited.
What can cause this?
AndyHi Miao,
The function to promote someone to partner is:
public async Task<ActionResult> ToPartner(string id)
//add partner subscription
var prodId = await APIMHandler.GetProductIdFromName("Partner");
var subscriptionId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
//set apim role to partner
var partnerId = (await APIMHandler.GetGroups()).First(a => a.name == "Partners").id;
await APIMHandler.AddUserToGroup(id, partnerId);
if (await APIMHandler.SubscribeToProduct(subscriptionId, id, prodId))
//disable starter subscription
await ApimDelegationController.HandleFreeSubscriptionRemoval(id);
//set local role to partner
await UserManager.AddToRoleAsync(id, "Partners");
return RedirectToAction("Index");
Where subscribetoproduct is:
public static async Task<bool> SubscribeToProduct(string subscriptionId, string UserId, string productId)
//The REST API and the delegation are inconsistent in how they represent ids.
if (!UserId.StartsWith("/users/"))
UserId = "/users/" + UserId;
if (!productId.StartsWith("/products/"))
productId = "/products/" + productId;
var client = new HttpClient();
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation("Authorization", "SharedAccessSignature " + CalculateAcessToken(ApimIdentifier, ApimPrimaryKey));
var uri = ApimBaseUrl + "subscriptions/" + subscriptionId.ToString() + "?api-version=" + ApiVersion;
var response = await client.PutAsJsonAsync(uri, new { userId = UserId, productId = productId, state = "active" });
if (response.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Created)
return true;
if (response.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Conflict)
var error = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
return false;
if (response.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.BadRequest)
var error = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
return false;
var errorf = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
throw new Exception(string.Format("Error in SubscribeToProduct: return status {0}. Content: {1}", response.StatusCode.ToString(), errorf));
The status code is "BadRequest" and the error provided earler is returned.
So at this time the user is added to the "partners" group, but I can't subscribe them to the Partner subscription, which is accessible to members of the partner group.
Andy -
Can't serialize access for this transaction error.
Hi,
I am getting a transaction rolled back due to a beforeCompletion exception:
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-08177: can't serialize access for this
transaction
I am using Weblogic 5.10, SP5 & Oracle 8.
Basically what I have is:
- A java app that will get an EntityBean, named Schedule.
- The java app will then create a SessionBean, named Watchdog.
- The java app will then call a method on the Watchdog, passing in the
Schedule: watchdog.check(Schedule sched)
- The watchdog.check() method will do some processing and based on the
outcome may or may not update the Schedule: sched.setLast(<some number>)
- The check() method is then done & return to the java app.
I see log messages (on the weblogic server) saying the check() method is
done. Then I see messages, presumably from the container for:
- isModified ------> true
- ejbStore()
And then I see the exception messages.
The strange thing is that most of the time this processing works just fine.
Only occasionally do these exceptions get thrown.
The schedule EntityBean is set up as <transaction-isolation> for
TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE.
There is no other bean trying to update the Schedule at the same time.
Does anybody have any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Beth
http://www.weblogic.com/docs51/classdocs/API_ejb/EJB_environment.html#107296
8
tells u about the limitations of transaction_serializable w.r.t. Oracle..
Pavan
"Beth" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Hi,
>
> I am getting a transaction rolled back due to a beforeCompletion
exception:
> java.sql.SQLException: ORA-08177: can't serialize access for this
> transaction
>
> I am using Weblogic 5.10, SP5 & Oracle 8.
>
> Basically what I have is:
> - A java app that will get an EntityBean, named Schedule.
> - The java app will then create a SessionBean, named Watchdog.
> - The java app will then call a method on the Watchdog, passing in the
> Schedule: watchdog.check(Schedule sched)
> - The watchdog.check() method will do some processing and based on the
> outcome may or may not update the Schedule: sched.setLast(<some number>)
> - The check() method is then done & return to the java app.
>
> I see log messages (on the weblogic server) saying the check() method is
> done. Then I see messages, presumably from the container for:
> - isModified ------> true
> - ejbStore()
> And then I see the exception messages.
>
> The strange thing is that most of the time this processing works just
fine.
> Only occasionally do these exceptions get thrown.
>
> The schedule EntityBean is set up as <transaction-isolation> for
> TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE.
> There is no other bean trying to update the Schedule at the same time.
>
> Does anybody have any ideas?
> Thanks in advance,
> Beth
>
>
>
>
-
Can VI server automatically close access for clients' VIs, if one of clients is already connected?
Can VI server automatically close access for clients' VIs, if one of clients is already connected? and when first client closed reference, open access for other clients' VIs? I mean like when you use web publishing tools. If one user already uses front panel.. other just can wait until first one will finish.
Please stick to one thread. Here is the original.
-
MY 1st gen iPad has candy crush ---but it is stuck in "an update mode". My iPad can no longer acceptsupdates for any games beyond 5.1. Therefore, each time I try to access the game it goes into a "pause" mode. I would hate to delete the game because I think I will lose my score. But I can't play the game either. Can someone help me with this? Can I go back to my last updated candy crush for my ipad, or do I have to delete it and start over? Also, how would I get the one for my generation iPad
I have a similar problem. But my iPad shows the connect iTunes screen and gives error 2001 when I try to restore it.
My iPad's battery was fine but I didn't use it for like 2 weeks. It's battery would've discharged and it turned off. When I tried to charge through wall socket, it got into the restart loop where it would show apple logo and turn off. So I did the simultaneous holding of Home and Sleep buttons for 10 seconds or more. It started showing connect to iTunes.
When I try to restore, the iTunes does the usual "extracting file" or something and go upto preparing for restore. But the iPad screen turns off from "connect to iTunes" and iTunes gives the error 2001, and the screen is back to connect to iTunes.
Also, if I don't plug in, the iPad seems dead, doesn't wake up or anything. -
SQLException: ORA-08177: can't serialize access for this transaction
Hiya, If anyone has any suggestions on the following, i would be grateful...
The exception is thrown by the flushing of the OutputStream in the following few lines:
java.io.OutputStream os = ((weblogic.jdbc20.common.OracleClob) myClob).getAsciiOutputStream(); os.flush();
The exception given is: java.io.IOException: Error while doing writeLobByteValue: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-08177: can't serialize access for this transaction at weblogic.db.oci.OciOutputStream.flush(OciOutputStream.java:152)
... plus a whole pile of internal stuff
This method is called from the ejbStore() method of an EJB, and it only fails the first time that ejbStore() is called, and then after that runs smoothly.
Any suggestions appreciated, Cheers, Karen.Thanks, took a look at that previously - still having the problem though temp solution seems to be to delete extra records from the table in question but this isn't the best solution by all means.
Thanks again -
Newbie question... Can I limit the number of users ...
Can I limit the number of users accessing a URL?
My company wants to start making videos available on our intranet web site. Once published, they are planning to send an email to all our employees (5000+) to announce the video. That's a great idea... but who asked the network guy if the network (server too) can take the load? NOBODY.
Short term solution... can I limit the number of concurrent users hitting a URL? And if possible, can I push a message to the users that try once the limit is reached?
Limiting the bandwidth is an option, but I will trash the user experience.
Long term solutions besides bandwidth increase? Cashing servers, WAN accelerators...?
Help !!!This is really not a problem for the WSA to solve. Typically the WSA is used to control content and provide security for external internet content. The product does not have the feature you describe.
However, when it comes to the internal hosting of content - since you are using an internal server, that server should be able to control the amount of traffic it servers, number of connections, etc.
~Tim -
I have a requirement to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages for some of the users and allow the access for some of the users.
I have applied the below code on the web.config file but this modification impacting only on the web application level not on the site collection and sub site level.
<location path="_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<deny users="*" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
<location path="_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<deny users="*" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
When I tried the access on
:<portno>/sites/<scname>/_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx">http://<servername>:<portno>/sites/<scname>/_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx page allowed the access for all users.
Please suggest the possible solution to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages on SharePoint2013.
Thanks
RamasubbuYou can't do it from OOTB.
_layout folder is accessible to the users if they have read access in any of the site even subsite.
You can modify *.aspx file, add your custom control which will check user.
[custom.development] -
HELP needed on Remote Management set to allow access for all users
my mac mini snow leopard server runs in a data center and i use screen sharing to interact with it. i played with the sharing settings remotely yesterday and changed "allow access for" to all users. i was disconnected immediately and i couldn't logon again. i have no luck changing to other users. i don't want to make a special trip to the center to change it back to whatever it used to be. i can still use afp to connect but the screen sharing option is no longer available. what does "allow access for all users" mean anyway?
thanks!As its name implies, allow access for all should allow any valid user account to access the server. I'm not sure why it's no longer working. It almost sounds like the ARDAgent crashed.
Either way there's a command-line interface to the ARD preferences:
/System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/Resources/ki ckstart
man kickstart discusses the options, including examples of how to enable access for specific users. -
Restricting Access for SQ01 User Group
Hi ,
Please let me how to Restrict Access for a User Group to only some of the specific users?
Thank you
Edited by: Vibhor Arora on Apr 12, 2010 7:29 AMHi,
Can you please clarify what exactly you want to know, your request can be interpreted in a few different ways.
If you are concerned that people have access to all user groups, then you need to remove access to S_QUERY activity 02 and I think activity 23. They will lose access to all user groups that they are not assigned to via SQ03. -
How can i open period for specific user in OB52.
Hi Expert,
How can i open period for specific user in OB52. As 'Authorisation Group' field is there in OB52, how can i use this field to restrict the specific user to post for particular period. How can i creat authorisation group and where can i assign it to the particular user...
Please let me know?
Thanks and regards,
Sam.Hi,
Here is the detailed process as outlined in SAP help.
Procedure
If only a limited set of users is to be able to post in a particular posting period, proceed as follows:
Add the posting period authorization (authorization object F_BKPF_BUP) to the authorizations of the selected users. Assign an authorization group (e.g. '0001').
Enter the account type '+' for the posting period variant to which the restriction is to apply. Enter the period(s) whose use is to be restricted in the first period, those which are available to all users in the second period, and the authorization group (e.g. '0001') in the last column.
Examples
A posting period can be successively restricted. If, e.g. 10 users have the posting period authorization with authorization group '0001', and 3 of these 10 users also with authorization group '0002'.
If the period is only to be accessible to the 10 selected users the authorization group '0001' is entered in the posting period variant. Access can later be restricted to the remaining 3 users by entering '0002'.
Thanks
Venkata Ganesh Perumalla -
Site Studio 11g: Different security access for each user
Hi,
I want to limit access for some contributors and grant full access to others.
I set up different users on the content server, assign a different contributor data file to each region, and assign unique security metadata to those files.
As result it still display the graphic icon for those data file with only read access. The contributor is not able to edit the data file but still capable to switch or remove the data file.
+According to the documentation only the files that a particular contributor has permission to edit will display the contribution graphic icon on the web page when in contribution mode.+
I need that the contributor should not be able to switch the data file or remove it if he doesn't have edit access to those data files.
I've applied the metadata security to the placeholder definition unsuccessfully.
I am using Account Security model.
Thanks
al
Edited by: user8859325 on 20-Jun-2011 08:21Hi,
I want to limit access for some contributors and grant full access to others.
I set up different users on the content server, assign a different contributor data file to each region, and assign unique security metadata to those files.
As result it still display the graphic icon for those data file with only read access. The contributor is not able to edit the data file but still capable to switch or remove the data file.
+According to the documentation only the files that a particular contributor has permission to edit will display the contribution graphic icon on the web page when in contribution mode.+
I need that the contributor should not be able to switch the data file or remove it if he doesn't have edit access to those data files.
I've applied the metadata security to the placeholder definition unsuccessfully.
I am using Account Security model.
Thanks
al
Edited by: user8859325 on 20-Jun-2011 08:21
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to download again Acrobat X Pro for Mac
I have purchased Acrobat X Pro some years ago and I have the serial number registered under my ADOBE Account. I am expecting to be able to download Acrobat X Pro on my new machine and enter the Serial Number to activate it. How to do this ? Thanks f
-
Hi, urgent!! I can`t see my Projct panel anymore! How can I get it back?
when i started the project i set up a project panel. At one point it was gone. I Perhaps i deleted or closed it, I don`t know. How can i open it up again? In the pulldown "window" "Project" has a hook, but I don`t see the Panel. Simple thing actua
-
D20 memory not reading correctly. Bios sees only 20 gigs lenovo diagnostic sees 24 gigs
Ok i have a d20 with one set of dimms not reading in the bios. I have tried using all combinations and it always disables one channel of one CPU not reading in the bios but if I use the lenovo diagonstic it sees all the memory and can also run the q
-
HT201210 how do i resolve error 3014?
how do i resolve error message 3014?
-
Invalid Media Error with Slideshow
I am trying to export a iPhoto 09 Slideshow to iDVD. It seems to take MUCH longer than it used to with iPhoto 08. The slideshow has about 900 images in it. I imported the images directly into the iPhoto Library from an external folder. After about 3