GOA Distribution error

Hi,
There is a user who has created a Global Outline Agreement in SRM and has distributed the contract in SRM, however, the GOA is not transferred to the backend. When i check the GOA in SRM, it shows the status as "Distribution Incorrect".
What could the reason be?
P.S. : I checked out the PPOMA and the user who has created the GOA is not assigned to the plant (in Extended Attributes) for which the contract has been created.

Hi Amit
In R/3, ME33 Txn, check today's contracts. May be contract is not created with the same number in R/3. You can also check in EKKO-table (normally, logical system is also stored in the table).
best regards
Ramki

Similar Messages

  • 00(055) : fill in all required entry fields - goa DISTRIBUTION ERROR

    GOA CREATED  AND DISTRIBUTED
    before that i checked in SRM no ERROR message IN srm but while posting in to ecc
    In ECC
    APPLICATION NOT POSTED
    BD87 51 status code
    00(055) : fill in all required entry fields BLOARD
    meaningless error . clue less.
    give me some clue.
    Muthu

    there might be some settings disturbed in ecc sysytem

  • Error in GOA distribution

    Hi experts I have the follow error in GOA distribution when I try to create Scheduling agreement in R/3:
    'No batch input data for screen SAPMM06E 0514'
    I could see that the problem is caused because there is no Company code information coming from SRM and it necessary in R/3 contract creation.
    I could see too that some friends solved the problem inserting the company code in badi BBP_CTR, I would like to know what is the metod user for it?
    How can see if the problem is really copany code missing?
    Thanks
    Nilson

    I think this is probably due to the material not maintained in that Plant/Porg. But it shows a different error message.
    Regards, IA

  • Incorrect distribution -Error while distributing GOA to R3 Backend system

    Hi,
    We have installed SRM server 5.5 and implementing contract Management
    scenario with backend system R/3 4.6B.
    In this scenario we are creating a Global Outline Agreement in SRM
    system and distributing it to the back-end ERP system.
    In SRM5.0 GOA (Trans.type GCTR) that are distributed at Header level
    are failing to distribute to R/3 system v4.6b
    We are getting this error message in SRM transaction SLG1: -
    The error ocurred by processing event RELEASED_NEWLY with GUID
    DCA7101B320134F1949F000347DE470F and object_id= 5600000054 " RECEPIENT
    NOT FOUND"
    The purchasing org , the plant has been mapped .Also vendor & material is maintained for the company & Plant .
    The condition types are mapped in SRM
    Pls suggest.
    Regards,
    Avinash

    Hi Avinash,
    In reference to your query about GOA, the distribution error might be beacause of the issues in BADI implementation.
    By using the BADI you can define which document to be created in the backend.
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE BADI can be used in SRM and BBP_CTR BADI can be used in back end R/3 for this purpose.
    Check for the transaction types (GCTR) and the number ranges for the transaction types.
    The GOA will either create a contract or a Scheduling agreement in R/3 back end after distribution.
    Also refer the below SDN thread in this regard :
    Re: Scheduling Agreement from GOA
    Any further clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for suitable answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • GOA distribution to R3 - Tax Code for ERS vendors

    Hi all,
    Having an issue with GOA distribution to R3 for evaluated receipt settlement vendors. For ERS vendors, tax code is a required field. There is not a tax code field in the GOA and this is not being passed in any iDoc segment I can find. My current tax configuration is calculate tax in backend, i have maintained tax codes I0.U1, I1 with U1 set as default. As shopping carts are transferred from R3 they are assigned U1 as expected and PO's generated in the BE from these external requirements are getting the U1 as expected. The problem is with contracts and scheduling agreements. Everything is fine unless the vendor has the ERS indicator set. Tax code becomes a required field.
    Has anyone else experienced this? I've' researched SDN and everything talks about shopping carts and PO's, which is working for us.  I cant find any info on the contract distribution. I've investigated the BADI's associated with tax calculation in SRM but I'm not sure these meet the requirement for ERS vendors.
    Am I missing configuration? Is one of the tax badi's the way to go? Any information is appreciated.
    SRM SERVER 550
    R3 46c
    Classic - Plan-Driven Procurement
    Thanks,
    Justin

    Hi
    <b><u>Please refer to few OSS notes.</u></b>
    <u>Note 1033458 - Item level Tolerance values in GOA not transferred to R/3</u>
    <u>1012486 Important Information on upgrading ERP-Systems in HA-Setups
    1014820 Indicators reset in Active versions when line item added
    1029026 Prob in conf. create-Diff in ERS flag for SRM and R/3 vendor
    849567 Output Control for ERS Invoice in Program BBPERS
    703876 Release note SRM Server 5.0 SP00
    762984 SRM40-SUS: Implementation of customer enhancement fields
    1010791 Flag Confirmation based Invoice Verification set erroneous
    1018855 Vendor flag POR expected is not replicated from backend
    Note 967107 - New logic for grouping backend contracts out of a GOA
    909516 SRM40/CTR:New line itm distribution flag cannot be unchecked
    1025863 Wrong Currency code during GOA replication to R/3
    1009872 Contracts : GOA Distribution value divided by 100 
    908058 CheckMan errors - Attachment Original transfer for Contracts
    940632 Distribution incorrect-When invalid Purchasing Org entered
    942008 SRM Distribution of GOA to R/3 System: Scales missing
    945029 Distribution of Target Quantity to QW8 failed
    880097 Attachment Original transfer for Contracts
    989367 Performance improvement for new GOA distribution logic
    916562 CM/CND: Dump in distribution of GOA with deleted line items
    922172 Contract attachment distribution enhancements
    925014 More than one attachment not getting distributed to backend
    923627 Attachement transfer to backend with possible file formats
    923227 Attachments transfer not working in Background 
    937221 CTR: Impossible to modify distribution in Initial Upload GOA
    967107 New logic for grouping backend contracts out of a GOA
    </u>
    <i>Incase this OSS notes, don't work, then</i>
    <u>Please try do this as well. Uncheck the ERS indicator, but then also pass tax codes from from GOA.
    Then try out again.</u>
    <u>For BADIs and other useful information, refer to these forum links</u><b>GOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution
    Distribution of GOA in R/3
    Source determination in backend (R/3) for distributed contract i.e. GOA
    FM or BADI s' used to create a GOA
    Transaction For Creating GOA
    <b>Incase nothing helps, Please raise a OSS message with SAP as well.</b>
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • GOA distribution to several contracts in r/3 not working

    Hi,
    I have a problem with GOA distribution to backend. I would like to obtain the situation when I have 2 items in GOA, in Distribution I have also two inputs (both for the same purchasing organization, but locations are different) and the GOA is distributed to R/3 to 2 different contracts - one for the first location and first item and the second contract for second item and location. I'm not able to get that working right.
    Typically, does the SRM generate 2 different numbers for to r/3 contracts that were distributed from GOA?
    I have GOA number 5600000150 and no matter how many items and locations (in Distribution) I indicate, there is always only one contract in r/3 is being created. When I indicate for instance 2 purchasing organizations in Distribution, there's only one contract in r/3 created for that first one.
    Please help if you know what can be wrong.

    Hi
    Definitely, seems to be a bug in the system.
    <b>Please go through the SAP OSS notes below, depending on your System release and support pack details -></b>
    Note 648393 SRM: Distribution of global outline agreement conditions
    1063593 Invalid price during contract generation in Backend
    859049 SRM 5.0: Restrictions for uploading and downloading
    1043517 Contract Upload: Purchasing Org. is getting lost
    956190 GOA created in SRM3.0 cannot be released in higher relaeses
    1042111 GOA status set to Distribution Incorrect wrongly
    743221 Deleted price during contract generation in Backend system
    656181 Release synchronization of releases on services
    896187 Line Item Internal Note not transferred to R/3 contracts
    942008 SRM Distribution of GOA to R/3 System: Scales missing
    852469 Error in contract distribution with service items
    954183 Contract price cut when GOA is distributed to backend system
    979111 Erratic distribution on adding new item or distribution
    781344 Deleted conditions on GOA in EBP do not update backend
    1030307 Portal Information not maintained in customizing
    1033458 Item level Tolerance values in GOA not transferred to R/3
    1037623 Incorrect Error message for maintaining distribution entries
    1028659 Missing contract number during the synchronization of releas
    1025863 Wrong Currency code during GOA replication to R/3
    897759 Allow transfer of global outline agreement
    909516 SRM40/CTR:New line itm distribution flag cannot be unchecked
    Note 847398 Incorrect determination of the EKGRP back end
    P.S.: In SRM 6.0, hierarchies on GOA is not present. Better to get more details from SAP by creating a Customer OSS message as well.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • STMS_QA distribution error

    Hello,
    We are facing an error with our Transsport system. The TR's are not showing up in the buffer list of our production system.
    There were 6 TR to be imported in the production system. But before it gets into production, it has to have the approval in the quality systems. After having given the approval, only 3 TR's were showing up in the import buffer of the production.
    The other three are facing a distribution error.
    "User KANDIKON has no authorization for the tp command"
    User KANDIKON has no authorization for the tp command SETACTIVE
    Message no. TP607
    Diagnosis
    To execute the tp command SETACTIVE you need the administration authorization S_CTS_ADMIN in the Change and Transport System. It can be found in the authorization profile S_A.SYSTEM.
    System Response
    The function terminates.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    For more information on authorizations and authorization profile, see the online documentation on the CTS. "
    The concern is how come for other TR there were no issues when the approver was the same.
    Please suggest as to how to proceed further.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ankit Mishra

    You should check whether that user has authorization for the object.
    S_CTS_Admin is needed if you want to do STMS activity.
    Regards,

  • ALE distribution error - 0 communication IDOC

    Hello,
    We are getting 0 communication IDOC generated for message type DOCMAS error for ALE document distribution error. Please advice where to look for the error.
    Anirudh

    hi,
    ani,
    u check this,
    If you want work items to be created when errors occur for the purpose of error handling, you need to assign the standard task TS40007915 PCROLL to a position or a workflow organizational unit.
    Or
    You can also distribute dependent objects manually for classes. You can use report program RCCLDIHI to distribute a complete class hierarchy including all classes characteristics, and characteristic values.
    Only the message code (004 - change) is allowed for sending a document (message type DOCMAS). This function also creates the document in the target system.
    You can control the sending of documents with the indicator Distribution lock. An object with this indicator in its status will not be distributed into other ALE systems.
    You can set the indicator in Customizing Document Management System  Define document type  Define status. The distribution lock is read when a distribution automatically starts after a change pointer is set or for an Integrated Distributed PDM Solution (ID PDM).
    You can ignore this setting by starting the distribution manually. When you set the indicator Ignore distribution lock in the initial screen, then all documents will be distributed overriding the previously set status.
    You control the distribution of object links with the indicator You cannot maintain the object links via ALE and Object link unchanged in target system.
    Information about object links are distributed through IDoc type DOLMAS01.
    The data is transferred to the workstation application and to storage data in IDoc type DOCMAS04 if an original file exists to a document. The Remote Function Call interface protocol transfers the contents of the original file, for example text or design drawing.
    You can determine whether you want originals of a certain document type to be distributed by ALE into another system under the setting Document Management System  Define document type  Define transport of originals for ALE. You can control distribution with various criteria.
    You want to distribute all original files of the application WRD (Microsoft Word) for the document type R-1 (report) that are stored in vault VAULT1 (Vault for Office Applications). You do not want to distribute documents of the same document type for the application WWI (Winword 6.0).
    You can process the status for the desired objects.
    1.     Select in Customizing Cross Applications Components  Distribution (ALE)  Standard ALE Business Processes  Logistics  Master Data Distribution  Integrated Distributed PDM Solution (ID PDM)  Object status (for example, Define BOM status).
    2.     Process the indicator Distribution lock
    ben

  • Need to get distribution errors in SAP Inbox

    Hi Experts,
    Please guide me where we can configure to get distribution errors to SAP Inbox of particular mail id.Thanks for your help.
    Regards,
    Siva

    Hi. Have you checked IMG Path?:
    EHS -> Product Safety -> Report Shipping -> Basic Settings -> Assign Recipient for Error Handling

  • GOA distribution as Delivery schedule

    Hi experts
    I am in SRM 5.0, and I create and distribute GOAs as contracts and delivery schedules, the problem is when the distributuin is done and and error occur the systen sets distribution incorrect, and sends the message to Distrubution monitor, but only contract goes to distribution monitor, the delivery echedule do not appear there..
    Some help will be welcome.
    Nilson

    if the outbound IDOC fails the error must seen availble in the monitor most of the events.
    we trust only BD87 and dont expect monitor. monitor dont trap all the error . true i agree.
    Are all errors are not displayed or only some error not displayed.
    can you see the same error in BBP_CTR_MON
    The stard logic could be BBPD_CTR_IDOCREF - the contract has 19 you might get notified in monitoring or not. are you geting the same for 19 message number for your GOA in the ECC system
    Muthu
    Muthu

  • FI-GL allocation - distribution error: no valid receiver entries exist

    When creating an allocation cycle with fixed percentages and distribution defined on own Z-field (exists in table T800D without
    checks) we get Message no. GA109 when going to the receiver tracing factor screen.
    This happens only when entering a range or set for the receiver. With one unique value we get the tracing factor screen.
    This worked before with ranges and sets. As far as we know there are no changes done at the configuration.
    What can trigger this error? Something must be changed, but I have no clue what...
    Can you give me some tips to help me searching?

    Hi Prasada,
    I can change the set I use, so I guess it is not locked ?
    The set consists of 18 single values, from 1 to 18. So I tried with a set with a range 1 to 18, and also without a set and just a range 1 to 18 but that didn't help.
    When I use only 1 value I dont get the error.
    Before we did some tests with the same cycle (same segments and sets) and we didn't had the problem.
    We have the problem now for more than a week.
    Any other suggestions?
    Renaat.
    UPDATE FYI: we had to activate valdiation on the fields used for the allocation
    Strange because we did tests in the sandbox before without these validation on.
    Edited by: Renaat Vanhaverbeke on Nov 6, 2009 10:17 AM

  • LV 8.0 Installation For Distribution Error: Required NIPathsDir property MOZILLADIR undefined

    I have built an application LV 8.0 and I am not trying to prepare a distribution package.
    I have created a LabView Project (.lvproj) and I have created an Application in Build Specifications.  That works just fine.  I can generate a proper .exe with associated files.
    I have then created an Installer in Build Specifications.  This appears to work, and it generates installation files.
    However, when I try to run my new Install, I get the following error:
    Fatal Error!! Required NIPathsDir property MOZILLADIR is undefined
    There is nothing on my machine (or the other machine on which I tried this) referencing MOZILLA or anything to do with MOZILLA.
    NOTE: I have previously created Applications and Installers in the Build Specifications for other LabView Projects with no problems at all.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Same problem with LabVIEW 8.5.1 and Win'XP SP3.
    Message Edited by Joe Gerhardstein on 06-05-2008 08:12 AM
    Joe Gerhardstein
    Averna Test Systems
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    http://www.averna.com
    Attachments:
    nidirpaths.gif ‏2 KB

  • GOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution

    Hi everyboby,
    I'm trying to distribute a GOA, or better I have distributed a GOA to ECC, but I have a problem 2 problems:
    1.) account category on the idoc BLAORD (inbound in ECC) is always <b>U</b> (Unknown). Instead I want that account category is blank (my back end contract has to have <i>item category</i> <b>W</b> (material group) and <i>account category</i> "blank", in this way i can create a release order with item category</i> standard and <i>account category</i> "blank", for direct material). How can I assign Account Category to GOA? It must be possible,I think me, do it with standard customizing, without any BAdI!!!
    2.) I want to distribute GOA to several plant on the same backend system, but obviously the contract number is the same and therefore on ECC back end only one contract is created. Is it possible to do this distribution without custom implementation like BAdIs?
    Thanks in advance.
    Bye!!!

    Hi Marco,
    1. the account assignment is U only for text items. In case material record driven line items are transferred, the account category is blank, like you expect.
    2. A GOA can only be distributed for each Backend System, and within one document is create for each combination of POrg and CompCode. This only works when you have POrgs arranged within Company Codes and not accross Company Codes. If the later is the case, only one document is created.
    More than one document is only possible via development by programming method MODIFY_DATA_CTR of BAdI BBP_CTR in R/3.
    Thanks,
    Claudia

  • Software distribution error with LMS 3.2 regarding flash/memory size

    Hello,
    I'm accustomed to LMS raising warnings about memory size not being enough when in fact there is enough space (eg : there is 256mb, IOS requires 256mb, but LMS calculates 255.234mb, and says there is not enough memory). I've encoutered that situation many times with LMS 3.1 and just learned to ignore it.
    But since I've upgraded to LMS 3.2, we are now getting _errors_ which are preventing us from deploying the IOS, even though there is still enough memory and flash space. I've read in another thread about bug CSCsu49349 but this one should be fixed in LMS 3.2, so I am at lost.
    I always download my IOSes from Cisco.com using LMS so that the proper fields are populated.
    Here is one sample : I was trying to deploy an IOS to a 2821 router. The IOS weighs 29Mb in reality and I have around 31Mb of free flash, and the whole flash is 64Mb, but I get a catastrophic error. Also note the contradictory warning about the memory size :
    Warning - SWIM1065: Minimum RAM requirement of the selected image: 256 MB  .
    RAM available on the device ( 256 MB) May not be enough to activate the  selected image.
    Increase the RAM size for the device, select a different  image for upgrading, or
    specify the RAM size for the image by editing the  attributes of the image stored in the software repository.
    Warning - SWIM1070: Feature subset of the Active image could not be  determined.
    Catastrophic - SWIM1200:Selected Flash partition  requires minimum (64 MB) to upgrade selected software/image.
    Select a  different Flash partition for upgrading the image.
    Do I need to modify the flash requirement on the image to get around this, or is there a patch available for LMS 3.2 ?
    Thanks for the advice,
    Alex.

    Hello,
    After running another inventory to make sure, I get the same error. Here are the steps of the distribution process (we can see I have enough room for the IOS, barely, but still enough) :
    Afterwards I get the failed message :
    And the same error message :
    Thanks for the help!
    Alex.

  • Acrobat Form Distribution Error

    I am using Acrobat Pro 9.4.3.  I'm trying to distribute forms so I can track responses.  I'm using the option to have the replies come to my email inbox because not all recipients are behind the firewall.  The distribution is using the default .FDF response format.  Forms work okay until I get the response.  When I try to open the file I get the following error message:  The file you are attempting to open contains comments or form data that are supposed to be placed on .  This document cannot be found. It may have been moved, or deleted.  Would you like to browse to attempt to locate this file?
    I've tried browsing for and using the original file and the distributed file.  Data shows up either way, but nothing makes it to the responses file.  We recent received upgraded machines and all software was reloaded with default options.  This feature worked fine before the upgrades, so I'm thinking it's something easy like reseting an option, but I don't know which one.  Any help would be appreciated.

    Is this in the wrong forum?  The problem I am having is with Acrobat's Distribution feature.
    Shawn Gallagher
    Program Specialist, Records Management, OSS
    [email protected]
    202-70(7-5595)
    >>> MichaelKazlow <[email protected]> 2/18/2010 9:49 PM >>>
    Please repost in the Designer forum.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HTTP 500 issue

    Hi, I finished most of setup of R12. i am able to login the DB using apps. but i got HTTP 500 issue when going to http://win03dell.MyHome.com:8000/OA_HTML/AppsLogin like http://dl.dropbox.com/u/40211031/t29.jpg Thanks & Best Regards, HuaMin

  • Iphone 4 will not sync after restore

    Iphone 4 will not sync via itunes via USB cable after restore.  Rebooted PC and iphone.  Latest version of itunes and iOS.  Device appears on left hand window, but the main window only shows the Apple logo, and empty white box, and a small LOCK symbo

  • I need to download a newer version of itunes for my new ipod. will i have do load all my music again?

    I have just bought a new ipod touch but i cant sync it cause my itunes is out of date. If i download the new version of itunes would i lose all my music. My itunes is very out of date and there is no cloud..! Thanks Michelle

  • After OEM 12c installation, how to install more plugins?

    I just finished up installation of oem 12c OMS, but forgot to pickup db2 and sql server db as plugins, how to add those in? are those plugs ins installed can be used to monitor db2 /sqlserver dbs?

  • LabView coding (8.2) explanation

    I was hoping someone could explain the attached block diagram/coding that I have come across in LabView. Please could you explain it step by step, describing each block and in layman's terms as I am a new user. The coding was created for a dedicated