Goods Issue gets cancelled even after GR

Hi All,
This is related to a stock transfer scenario within 2 plants in different company codes.
I created a Purchase order suppose in plant A . Then I post the Outbound delibery in Plant B which is supplying palnt.
Both plants A & B are in different company codes.
Godds issue is done in Vl02n in the supplying plant. Then the Goods receipt is done in the receiving plant against the outbound delivery.
Now if I try to can cel the goods issue document in the supplying plant I could cancel this document even though the GR is done.
Please let me know how is this possible and how we can have a check on this?
Regards
Jimmi

A cancellation will always be possible if enough stock in transit is stored in the stock in transit segment of the receiving plant.
The only criteria for reversing a delivery are as follows:
1) Goods movement status C
2) No subsequent billing doc (which could be reversed then VL09 works)
3) If the STO is intercompany scenario, the system reaction you are
    describing is part of the standard. The reason is that the
    scenario is operating in two companies and hence the controls are
    not there.
4) If the STO is intracompany scenario, this is allowed if there is
    any stock intransit even if the stock is from a different GI.>>
Edited by: Kenix Chiang on Aug 15, 2011 1:49 PM

Similar Messages

Index is not getting picked even after providing hint

Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
      to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
      t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
     to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
    t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
                      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   984 | 29686   (1)| 00:05:57 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26870   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26866   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24327   (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2539   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 26568 |   315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 24 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 25 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19258   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 28 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 32 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   848 | 26900   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26898   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26894   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24352   (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2542   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 22896 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 26 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 27 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19269   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 30 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 34 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GV

riedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 | 1004 | 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 50000 |    47M| 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
   2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation                    | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 | 1004 | 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE              |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T    | 50000 |    47M| 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T_IX | 50000 |       |    98   (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected.

IPhone 4 still gets crashed even after ios 7.1 update, & sometimes fails to reboot! However it gets rebooted after 30 to 60 mins later by itself. "HELP" please somebody

iPhone 4 still gets crashed even after ios 7.1 update, & sometimes fails to reboot! However it gets rebooted after 30 to 60 mins later by itself. "HELP" please somebody

1: Connect the device to Your computer and open iTunes.
2: If the device appears in iTunes, select and click Restore on the Summary pane.
Restoring > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1414
Make sure you have the Latest Version of iTunes (v11.1.5) Installed on your computer
iTunes free download from www.itunes.com/download
Note:
Also consider Deleting any Apps you have Purchased / Downloaded but you now never use...

Not getting internet even after connecting to wifi

i am not getting internet even after connecting to wifi. this occured after i tried to connect my i pad mini to a public wifi. i dont know weather it is a coincidence. any solutions??

My problem is solved. Actually i visited the apple autherised service centre. They told it may be because there was too many programs open in the background.the solution was
1. Swipe up with four or five fingers to multitasking and then close them one by one by swiping up with a single finger
2.Reseting the i pad by pressing the sleep and home button simultaneously
the problem was solved on restarting

Post Goods Issue (PGI) Cancellation /reversa

What is the difference between Post Goods Issue (PGI) Cancellation /reversal and Returns Process?

Hi,
PGI means actual movement of goods from the plant to the customer. So your plant stock will be reduced.
The system will also post the inventory value to the Accounting. That is Cost of goods sold will be Debited and Stock in hand will be credited. This inventory value is the Cost price (Condition type: VPRS).
Reverse or Cancel the Goods issue:
You did the PGI. But you have some problem in that delivery document. So you want to reverse the PGI. When you reverse the delivery, your Plant stock will be increased. The system will also create the Accounting document with the reverse entries. That is Cost of goods sold will be credited and Stock in hand will be debited .T. code: VL09.
Return:
You have created the sales order, delivery, PGI and Invoice. Now your customer returns some material. Then you need to create the Return order, return delivery and Credit memo.
Regards
M. Lakshmi Narasimhan

Post goods issue should happen even if delivery quantity is greater then pi

Hi,
post goods issue should happen even if delivery quantity is greater then picking quantity.WM is implemented.is there any solution.
plese suggest.
Thanks and regards
om

Please use over delivery tolerence and check hope this will work for ur business requirement.

SD-- WMS : DO line item is cancelled even after confirmed TO

Hi All,
We are in ECC6. MM & SD linked to Full WMS.
Process: SD-WMS: SO>DO>TO>Confirm TO>PGI -->Billing
Problem: User is able to cancel the DO line item even after the TO is confirmed.
Issue: Warehouse picked the items with TO from the bin and it is confirmed in the shipping area. But SD-Shipping user is cancelling the DO line item. System should not allow this. Is ther any config setup missing to lock it?
Thanks in advance.
MBS

Hi
Normally SAP does not allow to cancel confirmed transfer order. However, exception is transfer order for delivery.
If you are creating a delivery it is possible for you to remove the WM stock from the delivery with transaction LT0G. So it's nothing unusual.
If useful, please award points.
Regards
Rahul

Open Sale Order Value (FD33) not getting diminished even after closing SO?

Hi,
Upon Executing FD33 and clicking the status view for a Customer say XYZ , and then choosing EXTRAS-Open Sale Order . Say the value of open sale orders being shown is 75000. Even after closing the open sale orders (By Selecting VA05 and Putting reason for Rejection), and then also the Open Sales Order value is not getting diminished.
What could be the reason ?
Pls help.
Regrds,
Binayak

Hi Binayak,
As mentioned by you, running of Credit re-org program 'RVKRED77' is the only solution for this problem and it is known problem in SAP.
Some precautions
1. Always run the program in background by scheduling a job.
2. The idle time is around midnight when no user is working on SAP.
3. Some time the job fails as some other program may be updating same tables as this program. In such cases re-schedule the job at different time.
4. You may run the program 'RVKRED88' which will simulate without actual updation of credit values.
Hope this clarifies..
Regards,
Madhu.

Goods Issue of a Delivery After its been Updated.

I am using SD_DELIVERY_UPDATE_PICKING_1 to modify the Delivery's picking qty, Then I use BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE to change details on the delivery.
These all work good. But since I do not know how to do a goods issue with BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE, I use CSO_P_DLVRY_GOODS_ISSUE_CREATE. Problem is that the goods issue does not always happen with CSO_P_DLVRY_GOODS_ISSUE_CREATE.. And it returns only "cant post goods issue" message.
Is there a Function Module that will post the goods issue of a delivery that will return better error messages? Or, How does one get BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE to do the goods issue?
Thank-You

Hi there,
Apart from this, I feel you also need to define the strategies at warehouse level if WM is active at your plant. To know if it is active, check in SPRO --> Enterprise structure --> assignment --> logistics execution --> Assign Warehouse to plant & storage loc..
Coz items will be picked from storage sections in WH to process deliveries.
Try maintain the WM settings as well & check it.
Regards,
Sivanand

Workflow getting triggered even after event deactivation

Hi All,
I have created a copy template of standard workflow and activated event for copied template.
Then I deactivated standard workflow event by clicking in GREEN icon in row where BO and triggering event is linked with workflow.
Problem is even after deactivation, standard workflow is getting triggererd.
Is any step skipped for deactvation of event and workflow?
Kindly guide.
Thanks.

Check the event linkage in transaction SWETYPV (it should be similar as in the workflow builder).
Also make sure that you are testing in the right client. The event linkage is client depended customization. So, if you made your change in client X, they will not work in client Y unless you transport the event linkage customization between the clients.
Regards,
Karri

Job E2E_HK_CONTROLLER getting canceled daily after EHP1 upgrade

Hi, All,
We upgraded solman system to EHP1.Since then; this job is getting canceled daily with following error:
Job Log:
Job started
Step 001 started (program E2E_HK_CONTROLLER, variant , user ID SMD_RFC)
Internal session terminated with a runtime error (see ST22)
Job cancelled
ST22 Dump log shows time out dump
Current patch level is 04
Kindly suggest how can this be solved

Hi,
Details are:
Runtime Errors         TIME_OUT
Date and Time          07.01.2010 01:30:54
Short text
     Time limit exceeded.
What happened?
     The program "SAPLRRSI" has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime without
     interruption and has therefore been terminated.
What can you do?
     Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
     To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
     administrator.
     Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
     at and manage termination messages, and you can also
     keep them for a long time.
Error analysis
    After a specific time, the program is terminated to make the work area
    available to other users who may be waiting.
    This is to prevent a work area being blocked unnecessarily long by, for
    example:
    - Endless loops (DO, WHILE, ...),
    - Database accesses with a large result set
    - Database accesses without a suitable index (full table scan)
    The maximum runtime of a program is limited by the system profile
    parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time". The current setting is 3600 seconds. If this
Roll.... 16192
EM...... 594970672
Heap.... 0
Page.... 16384
MM Used. 585663104
MM Free. 9274032
r and Transaction
Client.............. 100
User................ "SMD_RFC"
Language Key........ "E"
Transaction......... " "
Transactions ID..... "4B446D5B2E061DFFE10000003630905C"
Program............. "SAPLRRSI"
Screen.............. "SAPMSSY1 3004"
Screen Line......... 2
Information on caller of Remote Function Call (RFC):
System.............. "PS1"
Database Release.... 701
Kernel Release...... 701
Connection Type..... 3 (2=R/2, 3=ABAP System, E=Ext., R=Reg. Ext.)
Call Type........... "synchron and non-transactional (emode 0, imode 0)"
Inbound TID.........." "
Inbound Queue Name..." "
Outbound TID........." "
Outbound Queue Name.." "

Getting Warning even after assigning the DataProvideer

I am designing the web template & even after assigning the Data Provider
I am getting this warning as
W25 The Characteristic %NV% is not found in data provider DP_1
& aslo I would like to ask
The requirement of our company is to use Web Reports .
so, shall I copy the existing template & use it or
shall I Design the Web Template from Scratch
your help in this regard is much appreciated.

Dear Chauhan,
Could you please let me know what is NV & how to activate Characteristic %NV%
Thank you & regards

Value not getting maintained even after maintain in some situations

hi experts,
we work on service contracts.
when a line item is entered, a value( iv_eos_i.) is set Yes/No depending on some custom logic in the line item level
this value is then maintained in the crmd_customer_i table using crm_customer_i_maintain_ow
but to my surprise, sometimes this value is blank even after maintain. This is not replicable while debugging
i tried commit work and wait , but client does not want this approach
Please suggest alternatives
Please anything...
please find the code
DATA: lt_input_fields          TYPE crmt_input_field_names_tab,
         ls_customer_i            TYPE crmt_customer_i_com,
         ls_input_fields          TYPE crmt_input_field_names.
*--Fill in CUSTOMER_I
   ls_customer_i-ref_guid           = is_orderadm_i-guid.
   ls_customer_i-zzew_lg_eos_date   = iv_eos_date.
   ls_customer_i-zzew_lg_eos_i      = iv_eos_i.
   ls_customer_i-mode               = gc_create.
*--Fill in Input Fields
   ls_input_fields-fieldname    = gc_eos_i.
* ls_input_fields-changeable   = gc_x.
   INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
   CLEAR ls_input_fields.
   ls_input_fields-fieldname = gc_eos_date.
   INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
   CLEAR ls_input_fields.
   CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_CUSTOMER_I_MAINTAIN_OW'
     EXPORTING
       is_customer_i_com          = ls_customer_i
*   IV_EXTERNAL_CALL           = gc_x
     CHANGING
       ct_input_field_names       = lt_input_fields
EXCEPTIONS
    item_change_error          = 1
    item_create_error          = 2
    error_occurred             = 3
    OTHERS                     = 4
   IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
   ENDIF.
Thanks,
Sangeetha

Hi sangeetha ml,
Can you please let us know what the client doesnt want?
Only Commit work or any sort of commit FM?
Regards,
Ankita

Sqlnet.ora trace files getting generated even after turning off tracing

Hi,
I have recently added the following parameters to the sqlnet.ora file.
TRACE_LEVEL_SERVER=16
TRACE_FILE_SERVER=SERVER
TRACE_DIRECTORY_SERVER=/ftpland/trace
TRACE_TIMESTAMP_SERVER=on
Even after removing these enteries from the sqlnet.ora I still see the trave files being generated.
#####enable tracing###################
#Trace_level_server=0
#Trace_filelen_server=1000
#Trace_fileno_server=1
#Trace_timestamp_server=on
#Trace_directory_server=/opt/oracle/product/10.2.0/network/trace
#Diag_adr_enabled=off
AUTOMATIC_IPC = ON
TRACE_LEVEL_CLIENT = OFF
SQLNET.EXPIRE_TIME = 10
NAMES.DEFAULT_DOMAIN = bsca.eds.com
NAME.DEFAULT_ZONE = bsca.eds.com
SQLNET.CRYPTO_SEED = "232166927-1713903352"
NAMES.DIRECTORY_PATH = (ONAMES,TNSNAMES)
NAMES.PREFERRED_SERVERS =
      (ADDRESS_LIST =
        (ADDRESS =
          (COMMUNITY = TCP.bsca.eds.com)
          (PROTOCOL = TCP)
          (Host = oraclenames1.bsca.eds.com)
          (Port = 1575)
        (ADDRESS =
          (COMMUNITY = TCP.bsca.eds.com)
          (PROTOCOL = TCP)
          (Host = oraclenames2.bsca.eds.com)
          (Port = 1575)
NAME.PREFERRED_SERVERS =
      (ADDRESS_LIST =
        (ADDRESS =
          (COMMUNITY = TCP.bsca.eds.com)
          (PROTOCOL = TCP)
          (Host = oraclenames1.bsca.eds.com)
          (Port = 1575)
(ADDRESS =
          (COMMUNITY = TCP.bsca.eds.com)
          (PROTOCOL = TCP)
          (Host = oraclenames2.bsca.eds.com)
          (Port = 1575)
BEQUEATH_DETACH=YES
Regards,
VN

SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
    (SID_DESC =
      (GLOBAL_DBNAME =ROSDMP.bsca.eds.com)
      (ORACLE_HOME = /opt/oracle/product/10.2.0)
      (SID_NAME = ROSDMP)
TRACE_LEVEL_LISTENER=16
I believe, this is the reason, you are seeing trace files even after disabling it in sqlnet.ora

Goods issue - getting message FN031

Hello,
while making goods issue to certain cost center, a message FN031 occurs - Business area & does not exist.
Cost center, plant masterdata is ok .
GI document has CORRECT value of business area.
question - what configuration activity can influence this message ?
Regards,
Laimonas
Edited by: Laimonas Bindokaitis on Sep 20, 2011 10:50 AM

Laimonas Bindokaitis wrote:
Hello,
>
> while making goods issue to certain cost center, a message FN031 occurs - Business area & does not exist.
>
> Cost center, plant masterdata is ok .
> GI document has CORRECT value of business area.
>
> question - what configuration activity can influence this message ?
>
> Regards,
> Laimonas
>
> Edited by: Laimonas Bindokaitis on Sep 20, 2011 10:50 AM
Hi,
Check the data comparison is proper in trx OMJM.
Regards
Shiva

Goods Issue gets cancelled even after GR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for