SD-- WMS : DO line item is cancelled even after confirmed TO

Hi All,
We are in ECC6. MM & SD linked to Full WMS.
Process: SD-WMS: SO>DO>TO>Confirm TO>PGI -->Billing
Problem: User is able to cancel the DO line item  even after the TO is confirmed.
Issue: Warehouse picked the items  with TO from the bin  and it is confirmed  in the shipping area. But  SD-Shipping user  is cancelling the DO line item. System should not allow this. Is ther any config setup missing to  lock it?
Thanks in advance.
MBS

Hi
Normally SAP does not allow to cancel confirmed transfer order. However, exception is transfer order for delivery.
If you are creating a delivery it is possible for you to remove the WM stock from the delivery with transaction LT0G. So it's nothing unusual.
If useful, please award points.
Regards
Rahul

Similar Messages

  • Header mat. in line item showing in zero quantity confirmation...

    Header mat. in line item showing in zero quantity confirmation. How to rectified it??

    What is the transaction code and where the qty is ZERO
    Explain me in detail.
    Regards,
    Deepak GS

  • Cannot see transported items in Queue, even after releasing them.

    I cannot see transported items in Queue, even after releasing them. When Iam in transaction: SE09, I am able to see all the released objects, and the check marks next to each one which looks good...Where are these files? Under usr/sap/trans, they show up under logs with nothing in them except log data...Not in Cofiles & datafiles either.
    Any input would be greatly appreciated.
    Alan

    Hello Jazz!
    Our developer released them, and I will get more details from him. We can see them when in SE09/10. Just cannot see them in the import queue? Also can't find the files under: usr/sap/trans, except the logs???
    We just want to find these files, and either zip them up, or put them on a CD for later use, and this project will wind down soon.
    Any other suggestions on how we can find these files, as all exports normally show up in usr/sap/trans/data, and cofiles...but not in this case???.
    Thanks Again,
    Alan

  • I want to block SO line item wise qtg Change ,after Post goods received .

    Dear Expart
    I want to configue SO line line item wise qtg change after PGI.
    Can any one tell me the SPRO for the said configue.
    Yeasin

    Hi YEASIN,
    This option is not supported by standard functionality.
    But still you can achieve this thru User exit - MV45AFZZ -
    Ask your abaper to write the logic and input in the user exit - and issue a warning message as 'no changes can be made as Delivery for this item is completed' or wht ever way you want.
    Because we had similar issue and we had done this thr user exit and it was working fine now.
    Revert back if you need any more clarification on the same.
    Rgds
    Sunil.

  • Sales order line items delivery cancelled but still appears in MD04.

    Hi PP Gurus,
    In the sales there are 6 line items are there out of which for 1 line item delivery and PGI happened. And for remaining line items delivery got cancelled, but these line items for which delivery cancelled appearing in the MD04, I have rejected the sales order line items but these line items still shows in MD04. Please advise how to remove these line items from MD04.
    Thanks and Regards,
    SHARAN.

    Hi
    Pl refer SAP Note : 1166713 for the Problem which says " You have posted goods issue and therefore the delivery requirements should no longer be existing. These inconsistencies can be seen using report SDRQCR21"
    Regards
    Brahmaji

  • Miro line item quantity and amount after miro

    Dear Forum,
    I have got the help about this subject and quite clear. Thanks for all have helped.
    Now I need to confirm 1 more part.
    Assuming in PO there are 2 scenarios where gr based iv is ticked and also not ticked, after both GR and miro done (complete the process from PO until book vendor invoice in miro), I purposely do another miro invoice type referring to these 2 PO.
    I just wonder why the item line still enabled with quantity and amount fields empty? I thought the line item should be totally grey out?
    Need advice.
    Thanks
    Rgds

    Dear Srina,
    As Std SAP practice system will populate the line item with enable mode even though MIRO fully done for said line item. But any how message will prompt if you enter amount & qty again in empty field & wanted to post the said line item as stated below;
    "Check if invoice already entered under accounting doc. no. XXXXXXXXX  2010". Probably you may refer to abapers to have user exit to control this field.
    Please view the below link for better understanding.
    Exits and Badi in Logistic Invoice Verification
    Calculate tax in MIRO
    rgds,
    nanthakumar

  • Sales Orders line item quantity getting Zero after free good line item

    Hi experts,
    i am creating sales order using BAPI  BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2   sales order having some free goods material  and line item after free goods line item having quantity zero.
    for example A B are  materials, A having free goods a1.  when SO  having 3 line items 10 for A ,line item  20 for a1 and line item 30 for B . But line item 30 having quantity zero.
    find code below and advice .
    lwa_ord_head_in-doc_type       = 'ZSO'.
        lwa_ord_head_in-sales_org      = '1000'.
        lwa_ord_head_in-distr_chan     = '10'.
        lwa_ord_head_in-division       = '10'.
        lwa_ord_head_in-req_date_h     = lwa_rof_s-date_del.
    *Order Header Update
        lwa_ord_head_inx-doc_type       = 'X'.
        lwa_ord_head_inx-sales_org      = 'X'.
        lwa_ord_head_inx-distr_chan     = 'X'.
        lwa_ord_head_inx-division       = 'X'.
        lwa_ord_head_inx-req_date_h     = 'X'.
        lwa_ord_partners-partn_role  =  'AG'.
        lwa_ord_partners-partn_numb  =  lwa_rof_s-lease.
        APPEND lwa_ord_partners TO lt_ord_partners.
        IF lwa_rof_s-del_addr IS INITIAL.
          lwa_ord_partners-partn_role  =  'WE'.
          lwa_ord_partners-partn_numb  =  lwa_rof_s-lease.
          APPEND lwa_ord_partners TO lt_ord_partners.
        ELSE.
          lwa_ord_partners-partn_role  =  'WE'.
          lwa_ord_partners-partn_numb  =  lwa_rof_s-lease.
          APPEND lwa_ord_partners TO lt_ord_partners.
        ENDIF.
        lt_rof_it_t = lwa_rof_s-zsd_rof_it_t.
        LOOP AT  lt_rof_it_t INTO lwa_rof_it_s.
          lwa_ord_items_in-material = lwa_rof_it_s-matnr.
          lwa_ord_items_in-plant = lwa_rof_s-plant.
          lwa_ord_items_in-target_qty = lwa_rof_it_s-qty.
          lwa_ord_items_in-comp_quant = lwa_rof_it_s-qty. "added on 12/29
         lwa_ord_items_in-target_qu = 'EA'.
         lwa_ord_items_in-t_unit_iso = 'EA'.
          APPEND lwa_ord_items_in TO lt_ord_items_in.
          lwa_ord_items_inx-material = 'X'.
          lwa_ord_items_inx-plant = 'X'.
          lwa_ord_items_inx-target_qty = 'X'.
          lwa_ord_items_inx-comp_quant = 'X'.
         lwa_ord_items_inx-target_qu = 'X'.
         lwa_ord_items_inx-t_unit_iso = 'X'.
          lwa_ord_items_inx-updateflag = 'I'. "'U'
          APPEND lwa_ord_items_inx TO lt_ord_items_inx.
         ** Schedule Line Information
          lwa_schedule_lines-itm_number = '000010'.
         lwa_schedule_lines-sched_line = '0003'.
          lwa_schedule_lines-sched_line = 'X'.
          lwa_schedule_lines-req_date   = lwa_rof_s-date_del.
          lwa_schedule_lines-date_type  = '1'.
          lwa_schedule_lines-req_qty    = lwa_rof_it_s-qty.
          APPEND lwa_schedule_lines TO lt_schedule_lines.
         lwa_schedule_lines_x-itm_number = '000010'.
         lwa_schedule_lines_x-sched_line = '0003'.
          lwa_schedule_lines_x-updateflag = 'I'.
          lwa_schedule_lines_x-sched_line = 'X'.
          lwa_schedule_lines_x-req_date   = 'X'.
          lwa_schedule_lines_x-date_type  = 'X'.
          lwa_schedule_lines_x-req_qty    = 'X'.
          APPEND lwa_schedule_lines_x TO lt_schedule_lines_x.
        ENDLOOP.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2'
          EXPORTING
      SALESDOCUMENTIN               =
            order_header_in               = lwa_ord_head_in
            order_header_inx              = lwa_ord_head_inx
      SENDER                        =
      BINARY_RELATIONSHIPTYPE       =
      INT_NUMBER_ASSIGNMENT         =
      BEHAVE_WHEN_ERROR             =
      LOGIC_SWITCH                  =
      TESTRUN                       =
      CONVERT                       = ' '
       IMPORTING
         salesdocument                 = lwa_saledocu
       TABLES
         return                        = lt_return
         order_items_in                = lt_ord_items_in
         order_items_inx               = lt_ord_items_inx
         order_partners                = lt_ord_partners
         order_schedules_in            = lt_schedule_lines
         order_schedules_inx           = lt_schedule_lines_x
      ORDER_CONDITIONS_IN           =
      ORDER_CONDITIONS_INX          =
      ORDER_CFGS_REF                =
      ORDER_CFGS_INST               =
      ORDER_CFGS_PART_OF            =
      ORDER_CFGS_VALUE              =
      ORDER_CFGS_BLOB               =
      ORDER_CFGS_VK                 =
      ORDER_CFGS_REFINST            =
      ORDER_CCARD                   =
      ORDER_TEXT                    =
      ORDER_KEYS                    =
      EXTENSIONIN                   =
      PARTNERADDRESSES              =
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT' .

    Hi experts,
    I am still waiting for your response......
    Thanks in advance
    Deepanker

  • No commitment line item in Purchase requestion after deletion .

    Hi SAP FICO experts
    Please provide solution for the issue .
    User created a line item 20 in the  purchase requestion with account assignment u2018Fu2019 (orders ) and  deleted this Item 20, usually when deleted ,the line item will be there with deleted symbol, but the line item was not there in the PR
    But commitment values for item 20 are shown in PR menu (Environment -> AC Commitment documents ) and in T.code KOB2 (Commitment  line items for orders )and in report S_ALR_87013019 (budget/actual commitments)
    So user was not able to process new PR with reference to their own budget.so i want to make the commitment value to zero .
    one more thing our client has upgraded to ECC6.0 ,will it be the problem for this .

    In most of the cases Problem with Commitments are expected for no valid reason. I suggest you to run Program RKANBU01 to fix incorrect commitment. If this is not solved check If you have program ZKAOIDE0 in your system. You can run this program to solve the issue.
    You can check Note [152571|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=152571]

  • ME22N : Change PO Line item to Display Mode, After All quantity has GRN

    Hi Experts,
    In ME22N,  PO change mode if the line item has checked with 'Delivery Completed' Indicator in 'Delivery' tab I want to shows that row always in 'Display' mode. Please help me to modify that table control within the exit. I'm using,
    Enhancement : MM06E005
    Exit Name : EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
    Regards,
    Rajasekaran.S

    Hi Raja,
    Think that this is a late reply but might be helpfull to others.
    To make an item in display only mode you will have to create an enhancement implementation in the below method,
    Class --> CL_TABLE_VIEW_MM
    method -->MODIFY_SCREEN_TC_LINE
    in implicit enhancement at the end of this method i code as below.
    data : lv_ekpo type ekpo.
    if <DYN_DATA> is assigned.
    move-corresponding <DYN_DATA> to lv_ekpo.
    if lv_ekpo-XXX is not initial.
    loop at screen.
      screen-input = 0.
      modify screen.
      endloop.
    endif.
    hope this helps.
    If you have a better solution kindly share the same.
    Regards,
    Taher

  • SHORT CLOSE TAB & LINE ITEM DETAILS GRAYED OUR AFTER PR RELEASED

    Dear consultants ,
    Once PR is released & we are doing any changes through me52n , whole line item is gray out .
    Also if we are not able to short close the PR after receipt .
    Plz confirm where is the customization for the same , so that I can change the same.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Hi ,
    In the layout , it is already a optional field ,
    issue is once PR get released , it is getting gray out mode ( non editable in me52n )
    is thr any setting related to release statergy ...?
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

  • Process Order accepts Confirmation & GR from BAPI even after Confirmed

    No matter what i try the formatting and CRLF go for a toss in this text.
    Hi PPPI Gurus,
    I am a beginner in this area and request your help.
    We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
    The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
    We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
    Case 1:
    1. Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only 100 is accepted.
    2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
    3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
    That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
    Case 2: (The one with the problem)
    1.  Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only the 100 is accepted.
    2.  25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
    3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
    At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
    4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
    The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
    5. The Process order  allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are  same .
    so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Suraj
    Edited by: surajprabhu on Aug 17, 2009 6:37 AM

    Hi,
    The standard SAP will allow the GR even after the Final Confirmation. The Final Confirmation is acting as a agent to change the status of the process order to CNF. thats all.
    If you want to restrict the GR then you have to do Enhancement with  use the USer Exits. Pleas try to use the User Exits PPC00009 or MBCF0001,MBCF0005
    thanks and regards
    murugesan

  • Goods Issue gets cancelled even after GR

    Hi All,
    This is related to a stock transfer scenario within 2 plants in different company codes.
    I created a Purchase order suppose in plant A . Then I post the Outbound delibery in Plant B which is supplying palnt.
    Both plants A & B are in different company codes.
    Godds issue is done in Vl02n in the supplying plant.  Then the Goods receipt is done in the receiving plant against the outbound delivery.
    Now if I try to can cel the goods issue document in the supplying plant I could cancel this document even though the GR is done.
    Please let me know how is this possible and how we can have a check on this?
    Regards
    Jimmi

    A cancellation will always be possible if enough stock in transit is stored in the stock in transit segment of the receiving plant.
    The only criteria for reversing a delivery are as follows:
    1)  Goods movement status C
    2)  No subsequent billing doc (which could be reversed then VL09 works)
    3)  If the STO is intercompany scenario, the system reaction you are
        describing is part of the standard.  The reason is that the
        scenario is operating in two companies and hence the controls are
        not there.
    4)  If the STO is intracompany scenario, this is allowed if there is
        any stock intransit even if the stock is from a different GI.>>
    Edited by: Kenix Chiang on Aug 15, 2011 1:49 PM

  • Bank statement lines are unreconciled status even after the auto recon

    In Cash Management, Bank Statements Loaded, Imported and Reconciled, but for the AP Transactions bank accounts there are few statement lines that are in unreconciled status and few are in reconciled status.
    IN bank statement line the Error code was : No matching payment, No matching Open Interface transactions, No matching payment batch,

    Hi,
    1) please check whether you are using the correct bank statement for reconciliation in case if you have multiple bank accounts / Statements.
    2) Check whether the payments that were unreconciled were all functional currency or foreign currency payments ...in which case exchange rates might be causing this ..
    References:Autoreconciliation Execution Report Shows Exception No Matching Payment Batch [ID 166716.1]
    Autoreconciliation Has No Matching Payment and No Matching Payment Batch Errors for Foreign AP Payments [ID 1387334.1]
    Regards,
    Ivruksha

  • How to move cursor from Line item to kuagv-kunnr after E-Message in VA01

    Hi,
    Hope yiou can help.
    I have set an error message to have sold-to and ship-to equal in some cases.
    When the error message is displayed the cursor moves to the material field in the sales order leaving the header greyed out.
    I need it in the sold-to party field (kuagv-kunnr) but I need to do this from USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAP.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks.
    Bubble

    but when i change the value in the item (F1 or F2) of master block and tab our the detailed block should clear but its not happening as i have used clear_block('detailed Block Name')What do you mean? The joining between master and detail block using one of the column (F1 or F2)? If yes. Then why are you changing the value of primary key? It should not allow you to change. Form will display error like Child records exists etc.
    but when we open a form after entering the value in the Item of master block and shows error no data found.. (bcoz as no data to clear in the detailed block).Really i am confused now. Because NO_DATA_FOUND error comes when any SQL fires to fetch data from database. Not at the time of using CLEAR_BLOCK built-in. I did not understand what you are trying to achieve.
    i mean when i change the values in the master block fields and tab out the detail block should get cleared and when we click again on the Go button the corresponding data should display.Why it should get cleared? I mean if you are entering the data in master block and records are already being fetched then what is the need to change the existing record.
    If you mean to say that the record you already fetch through the button. Then you change the existing record and you are supposing that form should behave like the button is doing now if records exists then fetch otherwise should go to the detail block and user can enter the new values then you should give one more button on the form to clear the screen and use same method to fetch records which you used for the button as i showed above.
    -Ammad

  • Link always the first 5 lines from another table, even after a reorder. How

    Hello,
    I'm creating my own expenses sheet based on the Numbers built-in model. I've about 15 categories and like to show only the top 5 and summarize the rest as other to plot a pie chart.
    My idea was to create a new table called Top 5 Expenses with 6 rows, set the order of Expenses by Category table to greater expenses amount first, and on the Top 5 table I'd link the first row with the first row of Expenses by Category. This is pretty easy, just put = and click on the desired cell, but when I reorder the Expenses by Category table the link is updated to keep pointing to the old most expense category.
    This is an example:
    Expenses by Category
    Home - $1000.00
    Car - $500.00
    Games - $130.00
    Computer - $120.00
    With this data a Top 3 table would be
    Home - $1000.00 (= Expenses by Category :: A1)
    Car - $500.00 (= Expenses by Category :: A2)
    Games - $130.00 (= Expenses by Category :: A3)
    But if I add a new transaction to Computer and it now gets the 3rd position, after a reorder the table is:
    Expenses by Category
    Home - $1000.00
    Car - $500.00
    Computer - $180.00
    Games - $130.00
    And the Top 3 became:
    Home - $1000.00 (= Expenses by Category :: A1)
    Car - $500.00 (= Expenses by Category :: A2)
    Games - $130.00 *(= Expenses by Category :: A4)*
    The Top 3 table isn't pointing to the 3rd line anymore. I've tried to set it to =Expenses by Category :: $A3, =Expenses by Category :: A$3 and =Expenses by Category :: $A$3. But it always is updated to A4.
    Is there a way to the Top table point to the 5 first lines?

    Felipe,
    That's a very interesting problem statement. Here's how I would proceed.
    Add a Table with the sole function of computing the rank of each category, using SUMIF to do the totals for each category and RANK to determine the position. If you are concerned about what happens in the case of a tie score, we can talk about that later - there's a pretty easy solution.
    In a third table, from which you will plot, use VLOOKUP to grab categories in the proper order, as determined by the RANK expression in the second table. Your sixth row, Other, will have the value of the total expenses less the sum of the other five, easy enough to write an expression for.
    I'd be happy to fill in any details you need.
    Jerry

Maybe you are looking for

  • With new bios resolved problem of the two controller

    Blank I would want to know if with last bios the 7,5 the problem of the controller intel and jmicron that they cannot work together and be resolved. Thanks.

  • Problem with geotaging with a gpx from datalogger in Aperture

    Hi, I bought a Holux GR 245 to track and tag my photos. I use bt747 to retrieve the log and create a gpx file. I import the gpx file under Aperture 3, the track appears, the time on the track seems ok but impossible to automatic tag the photos. I put

  • QUERY MANAGER RELATED QUESTION

    mY QUESTIONIS I WANT TO ADD CALANDER AS INPUT PARAMETER IN QUERY MANAGER IS THIS POSSIBLE AND IF THAN HOW? PLEASE HELP ME OUT THANKS IN ADVANCE TARUN CHAUHAN

  • Stacked bar

    Hi All, In a graph report i have 3 page items , defaulted to all in the drop down list of each page item. My question is " is there any way if i can choose them as stacked bar or do i have to include them in the columns? Thanks

  • Disable Individual Participant Audio in Breakout Rooms?

    As a host I cannot disable individual participant audio in breakout rooms.  Or can I?  I can't see how to do this. This is necessary, as there is always one user who is using speakers and creating terrible feedback problems in the room.  The ability