GR amount is not matching with PO unit price

Hi folks,
I have created a Purchase Ordre in foreign currency euro with account assignment project. Say the unit price of the item is euro 500/pc. While doing GR for three pcs, it is showing in purchase order history only 9 euros and in local currency column 44.45 saudi riyal as per conversion mention in po.
Why it is not showing 1500euros?
Please reply urgently.
Regards

Hi,
You need to check for following:
1 ) PO HEADER level currency
2 ) Exchange Rate in PO
3 ) Also, check for VENDOR MASTER :: Purchasing Data view for Pricing Date control field
Also for present date  check for exchange rate between currencies which is generally maintained by FI

Similar Messages

  • Why the doc total amount is not matched with the total item line amount?

    Hi,
    Recently when i try to update something in sales order via my add-on, i got an error said u201CThere is a difference between the document total and its components.  [ORDR.DocTotal][line: 0] Iu201D Then i checked the sales order in SAP B1, I found the document total amount was not matched with the item line total amount. Actually the item line is quite simple, there is only one item line with qty 1. How comes the document total could be different with the amount from item line? I know the document total amount is a read-only field which is calculated automatically by SAP. This is really weird for us, we don't know how this happened.
    Has anyone experienced similar situation like mine and how this happens?
    Thanks,
    Lan

    I am having this same issue and I have additional information.
    I am on ver. 8.8 PL 16.
    Periodically (mulitiple times a week), when a Sales Order is created, the Doc Total amount is -zero- when there are clearly items that have a price associated with them. This causes an error when Adding the document. Sometimes, I can just change the quantity of one of the items, which forces the Doc Total to update.  Most of the time this does not work, though.  I end up having to restart the SAP client and then everything begins to work as it should.
    This behavior is occuring on mulitple machines in our office.
    Earlier in this thread, Rahul mentioned that they currency rounding was turned off and that this could be part of the problem.  In fact, we were having issues with Currency Rounding and did turn it off not long ago.  Rahul, can you explain better what you meant by "give the proper amount so that you can overcome the error..."
    Randy Davis
    Denver, CO
    Edited by: Randy Davis on May 16, 2011 2:01 PM

  • KKAO amount does not match with FS10n amount

    Hi gurus,
    We do production order settlement.After running KKAO report,it is observed that some production
    order appears in KKAO report and same time it is not appearing in FS10n and vice versa.
    Pl advise.
    Regards,
    Samar

    Hi Gurus,
    Pl advise.
    Regards,
    Samar

  • GR price is not matching with the PO price

    Hi Gurus,
    I am created a PO with qty = 4 set and PO price = 70,750 EUR per 1 set.
    And in my pricing procedure i am using 3 condition types i.e,
    PB00,PBXX and GRWR(statistical value) = 2% .
    Total value of the PO = 3,04,480 EUR (including GRWR-2%).
    Using this PO, I did GR and material document is created.
    Now, what i am facing the problem is GR price is showing 3,88,680 EUR which is greaterthan PO price and i verified the FI document, in that also same amount (3,88,680 EUR) posted.
    PO price and GR price difference is 80,000 EUR (apprx.)
    Please give me the solution for this problem.
    PO pice and GR price should be the same.
    Thanks in advance...
    venkat.

    Hi.
    Please check the price indicator in the material master and info record maintained.
    Advise please raise this type in MM forum because you may get the exactly solution.
    thanks
    Kuntla

  • GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items

    Hi,
    I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
    I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
    I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
    But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
    I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
    Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
    Yogini

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
    gl_daily_balances
    gl_code_combinations
    chart_of_accounts
    And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
    Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
    More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
    So, I tried the following :
    (Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
    from gl_daily_balances
    where Currency_code = 'GBP'
    and currency_type = 'U'
    and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
    MINUS
    ( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
    from gl_daily_balances
    where Currency_code = 'GBP'
    and currency_type = 'C'
    and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
    This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
    Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
    Yogini

  • Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3

    Dear Friends,
    we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
    We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
    We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
    The sequence we followed as:
    IN R/3
    Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
    Stock intialization
    Material Movements
    Evaluations
    IN BW
    We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
    2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
    2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
    2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
    When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
    But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
    We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
    Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
    Please help us with your inputs.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Soujanya

    Hi Sudheer,
    No We haven't implemented this note.
    In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
    INSERT BEGIN
      loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
        if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
           DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
          delete DATA_PACKAGE.
        endif.
      endloop.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0.
    INSERT END
    We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
    ==========================================================
    Notes:
    However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
    1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
    2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
       1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
       2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
    3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
    4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
    -> material consumption value:
    IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100'   "Other Issues
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101'   "Returns / Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104'   "Material Transfer
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
                                                "Transfers
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
    ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000'   "Other Receipts
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001'   "Goods Receipt/Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004'   "Material Transfer/"Receipt
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
                                                "Transfer
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
      ELSE.
    if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
        RETURNCODE = 4.
      ENDIF.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0..
    -> material consumption quantity:
    The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    -> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
    5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
    =======================================================

  • Asset Balances not matching with G.L accounts

    hi,
    we some issue in asset accounting, the asset balances is not matching with g.l accounts, there are some amount which is updated in asset but it is not updated in G.Laccounts,
    how to match the asset balances with g.l accounts , when i run the ABST2 it showing the difference amount , how to adjust this amount in the G.l account
    Regards,
    Balu.K

    Hi,
    You need to pass some manual entries through OASV.
    Values appear in asset reports are coming from AS91.
    Entries passed through OASV are update in gl accounts.
    Before passing the entries please check the values.
    Hope this will clear.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Setup.exe gives a "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number"

    I ran the Adobe Customization Wizard XI to create a transform file and now when run setup.exe it always come with the error "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number".
    It does the same thing when using msi with the command : msiexec /i  AcroPro.msi TRANSFORMS=AcroPro.mst /qb!
    Here is my setup.ini file
    [Startup]
    RequireOS=Windows XP
    RequireMSI=3.1
    RequireIE=7.0.0000.0
    Require64BitVC10RT=1
    CmdLine=/spb /rs /sl"1036"
    [Product]
    msi=AcroPro.msi
    vcrtMsi=vc_red.msi
    vcrtDir=VC10RT_x64
    Languages=1033;1036
    2052=Chinese Simplified
    1028=Chinese Traditional
    1029=Czech
    1030=Danish
    1043=Dutch (Netherlands)
    1033=English (United States)
    1035=Finnish
    1036=French (France)
    1031=German (Germany)
    1038=Hungarian
    1040=Italian (Italy)
    1041=Japanese
    1042=Korean
    1044=Norwegian (Bokmal)
    1045=Polish
    1046=Portuguese (Brazil)
    1049=Russian
    1051=Slovak
    1060=Slovenian
    1034=Spanish (Traditional Sort)
    1053=Swedish
    1055=Turkish
    1058=Ukrainian
    1025=English with Arabic support
    1037=English with Hebrew support
    6156=French (Morocco)
    CmdLine=TRANSFORMS="AcroPro.mst"
    [Windows XP]
    PlatformID=2
    MajorVersion=5
    MinorVersion=1
    ServicePackMajor=3
    [MSI Updater]
    Path=WindowsInstaller-KB893803-v2-x86.exe
    I don't know what goes wrong as took my serial number on my profile from the adobe web site, same thing for the download of the software.
    Does it means that the serial number provided was invalid for deploying ?
    NB.: My goal is to deploy our Acrobat XI through SCCM in silent mode and I don't know if there is extra consideration for that.  For now it's only not working at the command line.
    Another important point is that the install works great without customization !  If I just run the setup.exe from freshly extracted files and I use my serial number, everything is working fine.
    So what goes wrong ?

    Thanks for the reply brogers_1 and Vinod Dbhal, you gave good hint.
    I retried installing the initial package in French on a Windows 7 English and the software installed properly in French. 
    As I used to work with virtuals for those tests, I rolled back my virtual and redo my test installation with chosing to install it in English on my Windows 7 English and again the installation finished properly but I was surprised when I realized that even if I chose English as language, the software was running in French !
    Of course I can change the language settings (in the edit-preferences-language) to follow the operating system witch is nice.
    That gave me the cue I needed to know.  I started from scratch my customization with choosing only the French language in the "Application Languages" and I left the MUI Languages blank and saved the .mst
    I ran again the same command : msiexec /i  AcroPro.msi TRANSFORMS=AcroPro.mst /qb!
    And everything works fine.
    NB.: As I used the .msi directly, of course I had to install the prerequirement Visual C++ 2010 first.  Otherwise the installation failed without any error message.
    Thanks again to you for your good hint,
    Bob

  • A PO has posted,goods r received but the invoice is not matching with the..

    hi
    A PO has posted,goods r received but the invoice is not matching with the PO as the TAX was reduced after posting. PLz clarify
    can some explain the issue plz

    Hi,
    1. You are talking about which tax (Is it Excise Duty + CST/VAT) if yes then you can post the Excise invoice with correct duty amount in J1IEX and then same will get defaulted in MIRO as per the duty posted in Excise Invoice not as per PO.
    If you have already posted the  excise invoice then go for cancellation of same in J1IEX and then cancel GR and Post excise invoice to reverse Part 2 entries and then again do GR and Post Excise invoice with correct amount and then do LIV.
    2. If it is only CST / VAT then simply use the appropriate tax code in MIRO as per the revised tax rate.
    For e.g. if in PO Tax code is 4% VAT and now if you get invoice of say 1% VAT from vendor then simply select the tax code of 1% VAT in MIRO similarly can be done in case of CST and Service Tax also. Only in case of Excise duty you have to follow the above method.

  • Entry View is not matching with General Ledger View in a document

    Dear Experts
    My problem is entry view is not matching with general ledger view because of  profit center. I have  posted the general ledger account with posting key 40 and profit center 1200 but when we see the same through general ledger view getting different profit center (i.e. 1410).
    Offsetting general ledger account is compulsory ? if it is working for one general ledger account it should support other general ledger accounts also, but it is not the same in our scenario. Any customization level problem ?
    Earliest help is needed.
    Thanks - VG.

    Hello VG,
    In the general ledger view, the line items for the selected ledger are taken from a data merge between the document line items in the entry view and the document line items in the general ledger view. In the case of fields that exist in both views, the data in the general ledger view takes priority. However, fields are only transferred from the general ledger view to the fields in the entry view if they are active in the relevant ledger. If fields exist in the general ledger table group but are not active in the relevant ledger, they are transferred from the entry view. In the data merge, amounts in the entry view are in some cases (such as cash discounts) distributed proportionately across the amounts in the general ledger view. This is necessary if, as a result of document splitting, a line item in the entry view has been split into multiple line items in the general ledger view. The proportionately distributed amounts in the entry view cannot then be used for reconciliation with account balances because the total of the cash discount amounts from the line items, for example, does not correspond to the balance of the cash discount account as a result of the rounding differences.
    Pls check this,
    Rgds
    Manish

  • CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

    Dear Members,
    The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
    System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
    In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
    I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
    Any help/clues?
    Regards
    Satya

    Hi,
    In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
    The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
    The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
    can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
    regards
    Waman

  • Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.

    Hello everyone,
    I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Himanshu Gupta

    Exactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
    thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
    Himanshu Gupta

  • 0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

    Hi All
    We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
    R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)   with the
    Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
    But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table  which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
    Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
    FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
    Thanks
    KPK

    In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data. 
    Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
    Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report -  G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
    I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link.  Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
    Please advise ..
    Thanks
    KPK

  • Inventory data not matching with R/3

    Hi,
    In R/3 production we have the data from 1999-Till date.From 1999-2004 Data was archieved in R/3 system.So we have two years live data in the R/3 production.
    We have filled the setup tables and extracted the Inventory data then loaded into 0IC_C03 Cube.
    But the values in BW report from 0IC_C03 is not matching with the values in R/3 report.
    1.What could be the reason?
    2.If we need to extract the archieved data from R/3 what are the steps we need to do?.
    Pls help us with your suggestions.

    We have followed as per the How to handle inventory managment document.
    The quanity value is matching between R/3 and BW.But the Valuated Stock Value is not matching for some of the materials.For the current period it showing the right value(for ex.if we check for 12th Month).
    But If we check the material for old months like October,Aug the value of valuated stock value is not matching with R/3 for some of the materials.
    In RSDV validity table date maintained from 1999-Dec'200.
    We are using the standard business content cubes and update rules.Is there any change needs to be done in update rules for 0IC_C03 cube to get the right values for all the materials?..
    Pls help with your inputs.
    Thanks
    Soujanya

  • Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

    Hi friends,
    while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
    At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
    Pls its urgent.
    Pts for sure.
    Vishal.
    9326179903

    make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
    if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
    you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
    As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
    Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
    Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

Maybe you are looking for