GR and statistical GR

How can we differentiate between satandard Gr and a Statistical GR?
In THP process some cases statistical GR are required.
Does movement type 543 triggers a statistical GR? If not how do i control it.
regards,
Sayantan

Hi,
   In third party scenario, the vendor will directly supply the material to customer and hence the GR is not mandatory in case of third party scenario. The item category S plays the role. You may control it in the account assignment category used in the PO (the account assignment category assigned in VOV6 for the schedule line category) in OME9 transaction and define whether the GR can be done or NOT. If you want to track the GR (when the customer confirms) at customer site, in your system, you may define the item category accordingly and post the GR for the third party PO, which wont update any stock. You can very well proceed to invoice without the GR also. Since its just for tracking purpose only, its called statistical GR.
   Actual GR will update the stock quantity as well as the stock value based on the type of PO and the material used.
   Movement type 543 will be triggered when you post the GR for a subcontract PO. 543 movement type will be triggered for the BOM components of the PO material, which will consume the BOM materials while posting the GR for the parent material. Its not statistical GR.
Regards,
AKPT

Similar Messages

Can I get from iConnect financijal and statistic report for single Newsstand application ?

I have problem to get full financial and statistic report for one single application?
Is there a posibilty thay kind of report doesn/t exist?
I can't belive...!

Welcome to AppleWorks, a discontinued application. I'll try to get you to the iPad forum.

SEM-BCS Statistical FS Items (Statistical: Balance and Statistical: Flow)

Hi,
SEM-BCS 4.0 and SEM-BCS 6.0 both have 2 types of Statistical FS Item (Financial Statement item); "Statistical: Balance" and "Statistical: Flow".
I note that these are treated differently, e.g. in Balance Carryforward task, Statistical: Balance are carried forward automatically while Statistical: Flow are not.
My question is, what is the difference between these statistical item types?
And what are they (or could they be) used for?

Hi,
I'll try to explain you like the following:
Balance is a value that is derived from beginning balance plus movement. Flow is the movement itself.
Trial balance is an example of balance, while movement type is an example of flow.
When you do balance carry forward, system add all the flow type that you define to make a balance, and carry forward the balance only.
Hope it helps.
regards,

Account assignment category for cost centre and statistical internal order

When issuing purchase order, we use account assignment category u2018Fu2019 for (PM) order, and u2018Ku2019 for cost centre. What account assignment category to use, when issuing purchase order, if we want to charge to both cost centre (as mandatory) and statistical internal order (as optional entry field)?
Do you create custom account assignment category for that purposes?
I reviewed Note 305385 but do not think it's relevant to us.

Hi Stacy
you can create a custom acct assgn category (AAC) in OME9... COPY the K to Z and make changes in it
However, I feel the Std AAC K should serve your purpose if you want to have Cost Ctr as mandatory and Order as Optional
Br, Ajay M

Manual and Statistical Indicator in Pricing

Hi
What is the significance of Manual and Statistical Indicator in Pricing.
Regards

Hi,
Statistical key
This indicator causes a surchage or discount to be set in the document statistically (that is, without altering the value).
If you tick statistical key then that will not be consider while calculating net price.
For Eg: You have created one Purchase Order the PB00 gross price is 1000 and the discount is 50. Then this Discount part will not taken into FI account.
Regarding Manual
If a condiiton type is marked "Manual" in Pricing that will not get proposed automatically in PO condiitons, you have to manully select the condiiton from F4 help and maintain the value against it untill you maintain condiiton record for the same.
You can see in Pricing procedure there are two condition types PB00 (Autoamtic) & PBXX (Manual & doesnot contains any Access Sequence)
If you check the manual box against PBXX then you have to enter the condition manually in po. It will not populate auto.
Reg,
Ashok
Rewards welcome

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REAL ORDER AND STATISTICAL ORDER

Dear gurus,
What is the main Difference between Real Orders and Statistical order?
Thanks in advances.
Babu.

Hello,
Note: Please search the forum before posting a new thread.
The following link may be useful.
Re: Statistical & Real Posting
Regards,
Ravi

Real and statistical cost

Hi,
can you pls. tell me what is the real and statistical costs in CO?
Each of their relations to cost center and company code?
how do they fit into CO architercture..
Thanks,
Maya

This is from some old posting
As real posting is concerned it is the actual transaction occurs which post the documents but as in statistical it is not complete posting so u can post it no. of times or no. of posting u can do in statistical posting . but in real posting u can do only one posting.
2. Suppose if u r posting the document for real order then in this case ur cost centre will be statistically posted and data will also statistically posted on profit center.
if data is posted on real cost center then here ur order will be statistical .and prifit center will also be statistical ,
this means that in all cases the data will be statistically posted on profit center either u have real coste center or order.
Assign points if helpful

Real and statistical posting

Hi
The master data of an overhead cost order are used to determine whether the order is real or statistical.
can you please give me the example for the above sentence.
and the path in controlling to find master data of an overhead cost order
Thanks
yaminisri

HI,
This is very simple. Go to KO03 and enter the Internal Order Number and push the master data button. Then select the control tab, you will see the check box for Statistical which shalll get ticked when the overhead order is statistical and it will be greyed out. You cannot change the tick and bring it back to real. This tick is got by default froms the order type where the parameter has been chosen that all orders created under order type shall be statistical one. If you need further info, let me know.
Trust this helps much!
Cheers!

Tools for monitoring and Statistic.

Hi there
I am looking for a tool that help me to monitoring and take some statistic from ASA 5500 series, for example:
monitor the number of connections in use
monitor the number of tunnels in use
monitor the number of sessions in use
monitor throughput, packets and errors on all interfaces of the Cisco ASA
monitor encrypted traffic throughput
monitor your firewall’s uptime
monitor statistics for TCP and UD
Looking at on the internet I found this tool LogicMonitor somebody knows if this tool is good and reliable???
Thanks everybody

Hi,
You didn't mention if you're looking for a free or licensed tool.
We use ManageEngine/OpManager as our main monitoring and reporting (NetFlow) tool for our ASAs.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Approval Strategy and statistical IO

Hello,
In the employee master record I have a cost center. I don't have a responsible person in the cost center itself. I can bring to C4TE Reporting Line Items as well (org structure).
Based on those conditions above two scenarios for approval strategy are available:
Case 1: The approver is my line item manager (own cost center)
Approval strategy: employee line item and it will read from the Reporting Line Items. Is there a problem that the Cost centers don't have responsible persons?
Case 2: The approver is the responsible person of the different Cost Center (<> own) or IO.
What would be the option here to achieve that?
Should I need to populate a responsible person in the Cost Centers or IOs before I bring them to the C4TE?
How I can combine that both strategy in one: the condition is that the cost center is <> my own cost center?
Can I bring from SAP ERP Statistical IO without Cost center and Company Code
Thanks

Hello, I am back to my questions. I will summarize again the cases:
In the employee master record I have a cost center. I don't have responsible persons in the cost centers itself. I will bring to C4TE Reporting Line Items (org structure).
Based on those conditions above two scenarios for approval strategy are available:
Case 1, employee own cost center on the expense report: The approver is my line item manager
Case 2, Cost Center<> own on the expense report: The approver is the responsible person of the different Cost Center (there is no responsible person in the master record). I can bring a file with the manual approvers if that would help.
What should be the work distribution rule?
I don't see a work distribution: "the line manager of the employee and manual approver" combined, if I use the manual approver for the second case.
I don't see a condition Cost Center <> employee own CC if I use conditions.
Can I create a two steps to achieve the above?
What would be the work distribution and condition to fulfill the requirements due to the fact that there is a responsible person on the cost center?
(If I use the manual approver I read that the approver always will be overwritten with the manual approver), which is not my case. Would manual approver help at all?)
Thanks,
Tsvetelina

Multidimensional database and statistical reports

Firstly, my knowledge in this area is very fresh, and I have a case which I can't seem to find an exisiting similar problem. So I hope you people will bare with me.
At my company I have taken a task to implement a report system for an organization. The given to this organization is reports with a statistical data which is very similiar to OLAP reports, on a paper or excel sheets. What they do is that they make another new reports out of these reports, by adding new column or computed fields to calculate totals of example. They might also select different dimension for the same report to find out new indicators (indicator could be population, economy, etc..).
OLAP was a suggested sollution, but OLAP needs a relational database containing the raw data, and we can't capture the raw data from those original reports.
What did right now is that we went with our own model, it's simply a database model works like a tree structure. This database will be used to first extract the original report dimensions, indicators and their records. Later based on this database we'll create the multidimensional model out of it at runtime, then to produce the desired report after inputs from user. I'm trying right now to write a prototype in order to prove our model. What I can do right now is build the dimensions and their column groups from the model, In a JTable it is represented by nested column header. Now, the major problem is to retrieve the data/cells, and map these data in the table cells according to the columns and rows. I'm stuck and this doesn't seem to be easy taks specially based on the current database model.
I wish if some one can help me with this, is there is similar known problems, datastructure, or at least where to start from.
Thanks in advance.

Since no one has replied it looks like I didn't explain the above problem well. After more understanding of the problem and doing more of researches, I came to know that the whole sollution is based on pivot table reports. Since that the data that needs to be generated not in the database, and could be result of rotating rows and grouping some other columns.
Anyways, so far I know that cross-tab rerports in MS SQL would do similiar functionality, and this is the aproach that i'm going with since that I don't know if there is other better or simpler way. To have more idea if what I'm talking about take a look at this http://cfapp2.undp.org/hdr/statistics/data/rc_select.cfm.
I wish to know:
- Is cross-tab queries is enough for this kind of reports?
- If there is other possible solutions, knowing that i'm developing with JAVA?
- If there is any information available about pivot table implemenations.
hope that this time I made it clear, any ideas will appreciated:)

Real and Statistical Internal Orders

Dear all
Is it possible to create a statistical internal order and specify another internal order for the actual postings as opposed to a Cost Centre?
Thank you for your help.
Thanks
Peter

Sincere apologies. My client only posts to Internal Orders with WBS elements for planning and budget perposes. The client wishes to monitor expenses for particular members of staff who are entitled to financial benefits. In order to benefit from avaiabilty control it was suggested either to create an real internal order for each member of staff or alternatively create a statistical order to do this with costs updated in the operational order. I believe the second option in not possible.
Thank you
PRG

Mathematical and statistical challenge for developers

Hi guys, a mats/statistical question. I've been asked to make a calculation in SQL (it's more fun that really job..to be honest it's only fun...anyway..) with a situation like this:
38 events ( basketball games). You can bet in more than, we can say, 100 points or less than 100 points. So you got 76 possibilities. If we decide to bet in 10 events more (IT WOULD BE ALWAYS MORE,
OVER) how much is the possibility to win with the different percentage ( I call percentage the over, so the minimun is 10 events more. Of course if you got 38 event OVER the percentage is 100% and you are sure to win).
So far it hard but it become harder if you play for example 25 bets splitting all the events ( that's means for each game the same number of the overall bet). Of course you cannot just summarize the probabilities but you have to come up with a statistical
solution...
Any suggestion for the step one and eventually also for the step two?
Thanks ( I repeat, it's for funny but it's a challenge for developers..)

Ok Stefan you're right I should have gone you more clues, but meanwhile I'm working...anyway I accepted the challenge..and thank you a lot to follow this fun situation ( the deadline is tomorrow at 8.00 am Greenwich time..)
Or do you mean each event results in one of two results:
p(n) aka "over 100"
q(n) aka "under 100 or equal"
I mean exactly this, or yes (over 100.5 points) or not (under 100.5 points).
I'm going to explain better the concept of the bet
A B C D E F G H I L M.....till 38 letter.
My bet A C D F G H I L M N ( I'm predicting the event that all these matches will be over 100.5).
The script shoud retrieve the possibility to win having:
38 matches over 100.5 on 38 total matches
37/ 38
36/38
and so on. So far I calculated the right percentage of the events from 38 (over)/38 (total) till 10(over)/38(total).
0.0000000004
0.0000000138
0.0000002560
0.0000030715
0.0000268760
0.0001827569
0.0010051632
0.0045950318
0.0178057482
0.0593524939
0.1721222324
0.4381293189
0.9857909675
1.9715819350
3.5206820268
5.6330912430
8.0975686617
10.4792065034
12.2257409207
12.8692009691
12.2257409207
10.4792065034
8.0975686617
5.6330912430
3.5206820268
1.9715819350
0.9857909675
0.4381293189
0.1721222324
Now I should calculate the possibility to have 10 right on 38 matches over 100.5 ( 100% of course), 10 right on 37 over 100.5 and go on...
Sorry if I'm not total clear but I'm running in different tasks..
KALMAN I don't have so far any code I'm trying to come up with a solution and yes...it's fun

Internal Order Settlements (Real and Statistical)

My client wants to settle the order to the settlement receiver (real posting) and a statistical WBS when the settlement transaction is executed. Can this be done?

I figured it out. Double Click on settlement line, add in stat WBS

IO settlement and statistical key figures

Hi experts,
Is it possible to make settlement based on statistical key figures (ex: M2) for internal order? as it is possible for the cost center (via cycle) i wondered if there is a way to do it for internal order.... Or the settlement with statistical key figures is only possible via cycle and thus only for CC??
Thanks in advance,
Chris

Hi Chris
This is possible, but in a slightly different way
Settlements cant happen based on SKF.. however, you can use Internal Orders as senders in assessment cycles.. For this refer note Note 605281.... It has a program which will allow you to use IO as senders in assmt cycle along with CC as senders
Then you can allocate from Internal orders based on SKF.. You need to define cycle in KSU1 and execute from KSU5... KO88 wont come into picture
Regards
Ajay M

GR and statistical GR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for