GR/IR account difference

Hi Experts
we are facing an issue where there is a balance amount left in GR/IR acct because of exchange rate diff . As per my understanding if there is a quantity difference between GR and IR account , then we do MR11 . But in this case there is a balance amount of 1.68 USD in GR/IR account . Can anybody pls tell me how to clear this amount .
Thanks
Devashish

Hi,
In OBYC, assigen the G/L for Exchange Rate difference
Exchange rate differences in the case of open items (KDM)
Exchange rate differences in the case of open items arise when an invoice relating to a purchase order is posted with a different exchange rate to that of the goods receipt and the material cannot be debited or credited due to standard price control or stock undercoverage/shortage.
Differences due to exchange rate rounding, Materials Management (KDR)
An exchange rate rounding difference can arise in the case of an invoice made out in a foreign currency. If a difference arises when the posting lines are translated into local currency (as a result of rounding), the system automatically generates a posting line for this rounding difference.
This May help U !
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Similar Messages

AL Clearing Account Difference

Hello,
When i checked a GL Account in FBL3N, there are 339 open items available with Balance "0" till date. But when I am trying to clear all the line items with F-03 then it is showing only 278 line items with 15 Cr as not assigned amount.
Please help.
JK

Dear,
Please look at the sap note 136754 on this and also the link below
Re: Difference between F-03 & FBL3N
maybe a help in sorting out the difference.

GR/IR account difference for posting in second local currency

Hello SAP Gurus,
We have set up additional local currency in OB22 (Currency type 30, rate type M, Translation on the basis of "Transaction Currency", date type: 3). We have set up exchange rates in Tr. code: OB08 and using GR based IR.Now:
1. Create a account assigned PO (with Goods receipt) in foreign Currency say EUR 500. Local currency and additional local currency are same say AUD. Exchange Rate for PO is .0.61120 EUR = 1 AUD.
2. Did MiGO with Rate .0.62220 = 1AUD system posted folllowing Entries:
TC= Transaction Currency, LC= Local Currency, LC2= Additional Local Currency
Dr EXpense A/C 500 (TC=EUR)     803.60(LC=AUD)         803.60 (LC2=AUD)
Cr GR/IR Clg A/C 500 (TC=EUR)     803.60(LC=AUD)         803.60 (LC2=AUD)
3. Did MIRO with rate: 0.61550 EUR= 1AUD system is posting following entries (WRONG)
Cr Vendor A/C      500 (TC=EUR)    812.35 (LC2=AUD)         812.35 (LC2=AUD)
Dr GR/IR Clg A/C 500 (TC=EUR)     803.60(LC=AUD)         812.35 (LC2=AUD)
Dr Expense A/C    0   (TC=EUR)         8.75 (LC=AUD)              *0.00(LC2=AUD)*
What I think it must do is keep GR/IR clearing AC same for both local currency and LC2 and post difference to original expense account in local and LC2 currency.
It use to work perfectly but seems something gone wrong recently in system(with some OSS note or something else) that seems to have cause this issue.
Any knowledge/experience sharing will be highly appreciated.
Cheers
Chandra
Edited by: Chandra Kaushal on Jun 23, 2010 10:24 AM

Dear Chandra,
Can you please share the screen shot of OB22 for your company code?
Regards,
Sachin

Gr/ir clearing account difference

i what cases gr/ir clearing account from migo can be differ from gr/ir clearing account from miro.
suppose at the time of migo gr/ ir clearing account credited with 100 rs then at the time of miro can it be debited with 80 or 120? i
f it can then plz tell me the cases.

Hi
The system makes postings to GR/IR clearing accounts at the time of goods receipt. If, for example, the delivered quantity for a purchase order item is not equal to the invoiced quantity, there is a balance on the GR/IR clearing account.
The person responsible for account maintenance lists the purchase order history with the differences. In order to archive invoice documents, the difference must be cleared. If the balance is not cleared by more goods receipts, return deliveries, invoices, or credit memos, the person responsible for account maintenance has to clear the difference manually.
For GR/IR maintenance refer Tcode-MR11.
MR11 is designed to show the GRs that have not yet been fully invoiced and the invoices that have not yet been fully received.
In any normal business situation there will always be some invoices for items that have not yet been received and some receipts that have not yet been invoiced. But MR11 is designed to be used to clear the OLD ones that are probably NEVER going to be completed.
So you would run MR11 with a date in the past (a few months old normally) and anything that has still got a balance (either way) could indicate that you will never get these cleared no matter how long you wait.
So you can use this transaction to clear these documents.
The best way to use it is to run it firstly with very small tolerances (value and value percentage) and very old dates. For example any PO older than 6 months that has a balance of less than 10 USD. You would prepare the list intially (without update) and see the proposed effect. If you were happy with this you can then run it in update mode and clear those documents. This will post any outstanding values correctly and close down the PO.
For example if you had a PO where you had received 99 and the invoice was for 100, the system would increase the stock value of those 99 by 1 to reflect that we paid 100 for those 99 items (and close the PO)
Similarly if you received 100 and were invoiced for 99 the clearing would reduce the stock value by 1
Both examples are affected by the valuation type (Std price or MAP) but the end result is the same.
After running it like this with small differences, the only uncleared items left would be the recent ones, or the "old" ones that have a bigger difference. You can then run MR11 with larger tolerances, view what would happen and either re run the same selection with update instead of list and clear these.
You would eventually finish up with a manageable number of POs that don't balance and the value difference is quite large. You would then have to decide if you want to leave them as they are and wait for the open amount to be invoiced (or GRd), or you can manually clear them by selecting the individual line and then selecting the clear from the menu options.
At the end of this process you should only have POs that are awaiting further postings.
You would also have to financially clear the entries that have been cleared in MR11 but this would be via the normal financial clearing transactions.
reward if helps,
regards
rb

Retained earnings account- differences between F.01, FS10N, FBL3N

Hi Sap Gurus
Maybe someone can help me. When Iu2019m trying to control the amounts for the retained earnings account comparing the FS10N, FS10N drilldown, FBL3N, and F.01 they give me all different values.
I understand that the differences between the FS10N and FBL3N can be related to the carryfowrd process.
But, okey. Why when Iu2019m double click on the FS10N report the system shows a different value from the FBL3N? Another problem is when I compare the amount from FS10N and F.01 for the same retained earnings account, the system show complete different values, how I can verify the amounts for control and audit process?
Regards
Gabriela

I cannot speak on F.01 but between FS10N and FBL3N and FS10N drill down, they should equal in grand total. Keep in mind that FS10N GL Account balance display is based on one fiscal year display but the cumulative balance should be all activity from day 1 that has been carried forward.
Try running FS10N for the last fiscal year possible. If carryforward for the retained earnings accounts have been performed for each year, then the ending figure in the cumulative balance column will equal the same total ending balance you get when you execute FBL3N GL Line item display for the same retained earnings account (providing you select "All items" and don't include in posting date restrictions or any others on the selection screen).
Using FS10N for each fiscal year, you can check to to see if the beginning cumulative balance is the same as the previous years ending cumulative balance. If not then they may be a carryforward issue.

What is GL account, difference bet. Doc.date and posting date, etc.

Hello Experts,
Currently I am supporting reports/programs for FI module. Can anybody please help
me or give me walkthrough on what are the terms like posting key, document date,
posting date, type, account, etc. I am currently modifying a report which posts in
transaction F-02. Any tips and guides will be highly appreciated. Thanks guys and take care!

Hi,
GL Account: This field contains the number of the G/L account to which the transaction figures are updated.we use One gl account for Salaries in an Orgn, and for expenses one GL like that.
Document Date: The document date is the date on which the original document was issued.
Posting date:Date which is used when entering the document in Financial Accounting or Controlling
The fiscal year and the period for which an update of the accounts specified in the document or cost elements is made, are derived from the posting date.
When entering documents, the system checks whether the posting date entered is allowed by means of the posting period permitted.
The posting date can differ from both the entry date (day of entry into the system) and the document date (day of creation of the original document).
Posting Key:The posting key describes the type of transaction which is entered in a line item.
For every posting key, you specify properties which control the entry of the line item or are noted in the line item itself.
The most important properties which are derived from the posting key are:
The account type
The allocation to the debits or credits side
The possible or necessary specifications which are to be entered in the line item.
DocType:The document type classifies the accounting documents. It is stored in the document header.
Attributes that control the entry of the document, or which are themselves noted in the document, are defined for each document type. In particular, the number range assigned to the associated documents is defined on the basis of the document type.
reward if useful
regards,
Anji

Clearing GR/IR account differences

Hi All
How to clear the imbalances in the GR/IR clearing accounts?
Regards
Rajesh

Hi
If no more goods or invoices are to be received for a PO, then you must clear the GR/IR balance manually.
This can be done in different ways:
            You can return the extra goods to the vendor
            You can cancel the invoice.
            You can clear the GR/IR clearing account manually.
To clear the GR/IR account you can use the t-code MR11 - Maintain GR/IR clearing account
For more details on GR/IR account clearing, refer the PDF from the below link:
help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMIVWERE/MMIVWERE.pdf
Thanks
E.Avudaiappan

Stock account difference between GR and IR

Hi Friends,
PO is created for some quantity and price.
No taxes and discounts are maintained so net price is equal to gross price.
While doing GR, stock account is debited with different value instead of net price in PO.
However IR is done with proper value.
In a nutshell, for the same qty, GR value is different from PO price.
Thanks in Advance.
Raju

Hi,
Check the Accounting View of the Material and the Price control used.Whether it is Standard Price or Moving Average Price.Accordingly the system will behave.
Dhruba

Currency translation differences with an effect on earnings

Product Version: SAP R/3 46.C
Componente: EC-CS-CSF-E Currency Translation
In currency translation program of ECCS (tx CX40) the prior year portion of translation differences that affects earnings is posted in current period in the earnings retain item (ER) which according to SAP documentation "Currency translation differences with subsequent consolidations" is correct, however when we run the currency translation on subsequents periods this amount is posted again generating a multiplying of differences on each period.
In accordance with section u201CBu201D of SAP note 553586, the carryforward item (retain earnings) was assigned to translation key 5, to avoid multiplications of this difference in every execution of currency translation for current period. This correction was applied successfully, however the problem is now generated when we run the currency translation in every subsequent period.
SAP notes 582815 and 553586 was applied succesfully.
We also verified SAP note 1045402 changing the translation key 5 to 1, for balance carryforward item (retained earnings) this avoids the difference effect on subsequents periods, but generates a translation differential effect undesired on this item, since this is a historical item that not must be altered by currency translation.
Additionally we read SAP note 509509 and we think that this issue corresponds whit symptom 2 of that note.
Step by Step:
Transaction: CX40
Setting of Translation SET in translation method:
1.- MARS-GAP-Monetary:
1.1.- Items of balance sheet
1.2.- Translation Key 1
1.3.- Item for differences: income statement item with an effect on earnings
2.- MARS-GAP-NonMonetary
2.1.- Items of balance sheet
2.2.- Translation Key 6
2.3.- Item for differences: income statement item with an effect on earnings
3.-MARS-MOR-Monetary
3.1.- Items of P&L
3.2.- Translation Key 5
3.3.- Item for differences: income statement item without an effect on earnings
4.-MARS-MOR-NonMonetary
4.1.- Items of P&L
4.2.- Translation Key 6
4.3.- Item for differences: income statement item without an effect on earnings
5.- MARS-HIST
5.1.- Items of balance sheet
5.2.- Translation Key 6
5.3.- Item for differences: Balance sheet item without an effect on earnings
6.- ANI-BS-FX
6.1.- Items of differences SET MARS-HIST and Carryforward Item for special items in transaction CXD3, the same item for the balance carryforward (retained earnings)
6.2.- Translation Key 5
6.3.- Item for differences: Balance sheet item without an effect on earnings (the same item for the SET MARS-HIST)
7.- ANI-BS
7.1.- The special balance sheet item in Transaction CXD3
7.2.- Translation Key 5
7.3.- Item for differences, the same item
8.- ANI-IS
8.1.- The special income statement item in Transaction CXD3
8.2.- Translation Key 5
8.3.- Item for differences, The same item
Note:
1 .- According to the point A of the note 553586 was included the FS Item 484051011(difference item for SET MARS-HIST) in the conversion SET ANI-BS-FX
2 .- According to Section B of the note 553586 was included the account for carried forward 481000001 the special accounts set up in the transaction CXD3 in the conversion SET ANI-BS-FX
3 .- According to Section C of note 553586 are included special accounts set up in the transaction CXD3 390000 and 251200, in the conversion SET ANI-IS and ANI-BS respectively.
When run the currency translation in the new year 1-2011, the prior year portion of translation differences that affects earnings is posted in current period a credit to earnings retain and debit to account difference in SET for this account. This amount is same on special balance sheet item 251200, in tx CXD3, also found on the statistical FS item.
Then in subsequent periods, 2 - 2011 it posting another credit to earnings retain and debit to account difference in SET for this account, generating a multiplying of differences on each period, even though the difference for this account (ER) in the log of the translation currency is equal to the difference posted to the previous period, show this in transaction CX34 for items of translation (1) for this account until 1-2011.
Edited by: Ana Brito on Jul 25, 2010 8:10 PM

Hi,
just a information how I did a workaround about this:
The opening (movement type 100) of the balance sheet item "differences of currency translation" is customized with "don't change...".
Every increase to "differences of currency translation" works with e.g. movement type 120 and will be carried forward to 100.
Maybe this is a scenario you can use...
BR

Difference in report FS10 and S_ALR_87012004

Hi Gurus,
I have asset account which is CWIP asset, and I do APC in this asset and also AIAB in this.?
I have following questions on this account
Difference in report FS10 and S_ALR_87012004
Why this report have difference?
What are the possiblity of the difference?with examples?
Please also give the transaction included and excluded in the above reports.
Thanks You
Vikas

Hi shivaji mohanty
How did you resolve the below issue ?. I would like to know the details of soulutions.
I have to resolve the similar issue with my hand. Please share your experience.
Thanks & Regards
Sriram

F-32 Difference Postings with Special G/L indicators

When we clear AR line items using F-32, and all the transactions we are clearing have the same Special G/L indicator, any difference posting generated does NOT get allocated to that Special G/L indicator, which is NOT what we want - e.g. if we clear the "C" account, then we want any automatically generated AB on account difference posting to also go to the "C" account, but it goes to the normal trading account (i.e. with no Special G/L indicator).
Does anyone know this can be changed via configuration?
Thanks.

Hi
A payment recorded with special GL indicator is automatically set as locked. This is sap program and cant be changed. When the related invoice is recorded , the down payment can be cleared with it using F-39, provided the down payment relates to the same sales / purchase order.
For the difference in customer amount, its difficult to answer as it may be due to wrong account selection or wrong amount entered in customer.
Thanks
kamala

LINEITEMS MISSING IN FBL3N AND FS10N

Hi all,
I am facing the problem in differences in balances for both FS10N & FBL3N for same g/l account.There were some GL accounts showing difference .what i observed was they Migrated in 2000. for some g/l accounts i found balance in fs10n for all 12 periods in the year 2000, but there were no line items for respective g/l accounts.but they carry forwarded balance to 2001and so on up to 2007.
If i go for balances in fs10n and fbl3n as of 2007 the balance is different from fs10n.
In fs10n when i click on lineitem display in total balance colomn = all items for 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2007 balances in fbl3n.
when I click on line item in fs10n incumulatibalance colomn (is not equal to) all items for 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2007 balances in fbl3n.
I tried open&line item programs to generate lineitems but failed.
In debugging it is showing these g/l accounts are not storing in BSIS table.
Please give u r valuble advise for resolving this issue.
Is it correct to go for SAP help, there were some g/l accounts having this program remaing are showing correctly.
how SAP help to us to resolving this issue its not a problem with standard functionality .
please send me u r valuble advises
Regards
Chandra

Hi,
There are so many threads in this forum explaining this concept. Go through them.
FS10N and drill down to FBL3N
Balance differences in FBL3N &FS10N for same G/L account
Difference between FS10N report and S_ALR_87012082 Report
Diffrence in Total amount and Line item totals in FS10N
Re: balance diferences and line items missing in fs10n & fbl3n for same G/L
Re: difference in GL account balance & Balance showing in Trial Balance
Urgent:Difference amount in customer a/c statement and customer ledger bal
G/L Balance and Line items difference
Difference In Reports FBL1N & FK10N
Regards
Jyostna

Transaction MIRO+FB01(invoice posting) and in Transaction F110(Payment)u00A0u00A0u00A0u00A0

Hi,
when my user wants to pay a vendor opent item, the realized exchange rate difference can not be assigned to a CO object if the paying invoice is originally assigned to a directly capitalized asset. indeed,
original invoice, there is only an asset and a statistical investment order. There should be the cost center as actual CO object. It is however not populated .Can you advise so that the cost center is automatically populated and so that the exchange rate difference is assigned to this cost center and statistical investment order.
Thank you
Medha

You should assign a cost center to the exchange rate account difference trough OKB9.\ or as an alternative a substitution
Edited by: Jose Lastra on Oct 17, 2009 11:39 AM

FS-CD Queries

Hello
I am new to FS-CD and have some queries which are :
1. Nominees are covered where? Will system be able to disburse check to them once the holder deceases?
2. Group Mediclaim Policy- Corporate/Person? How does it work in system?
3. Broker and Commission contract account Differences?
4. Functionality of Dunning - Can we have a dunning notice sent before the premium is due?
5. Payment Plan and Dunning Relationship- Does payment plan affect dunning in any way. Where can the relationshup be established?
6. What amount of Correspondences can be dealt in FS-CD? Meaning maximum number which can be dealt.
7. Interest Calculation -Credit . There is a section where there is a credit of interest. This is one thing which is unclear. When will insurance co pay interest.
8. Credit cards till confirmartion - How does the system work for credit cards? For that matter all payments? Do we have something like FBZP here as well?
Please respond to any of thers

Hi
I am not sure if your problem is solved or not, but here is what i think the issue can be.
Dunning is usually done in two steps.
--> Dunning Proposal Run(VPVA) : It will create a dunning proposal for the list of all the applicable dunning items. Which is usually reviewed by the clerk before carrying out the dunning activity.
During this step Print Date is not update.
--> Dunning Activity Run(VPVB) : It determines and executes the dunning activities defined in the dunning procedures and dunning level. It refers to items that were determined during dunning proposal run.
During this step the print date is update.
Now regarding the items not shown in the dunning histroy transaction (VYM10). This is because you have not executed the dunning Activity run, so the items are still not dunned. Technical they are still under review.
On the other hand if you want, you can use FPM3 which will display the list from both, the dunning proposal run and dunning activity run.
Regards
Mithlesh

T-CODE DIFFERS

HI SAP GURUS
THEREIS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BALANCE OF FS10N & FBL3N.
I
I M CHECKING G/L NOT ANY CUST /VEND/ RECO A/C.. BUSINEE AREA 7 FICALYEAR ALSO CHECKED & BOTH ARE CORRECT. STILL DIFFERENCES COME
PL SOLVE THIS PROBLEM
ANKITA

Hi,
All the following threads discuss on the above topic. Hope any of them may be useful for you.
FS10N and drill down to FBL3N
Balance differences in FBL3N &FS10N for same G/L account
Difference between FS10N report and S_ALR_87012082 Report
Diffrence in Total amount and Line item totals in FS10N
Re: balance diferences and line items missing in fs10n & fbl3n for same G/L
Re: difference in GL account balance & Balance showing in Trial Balance
Urgent:Difference amount in customer a/c statement and customer ledger bal
G/L Balance and Line items difference
Difference In Reports FBL1N & FK10N
Regards
Jyostna

GR/IR account difference

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for