GR/IR clearance

Hi All,
In PO price for material is 10000. In taxes (invoice tab, display taxes, tax value is 1500. While doing GR the whole of 11500 is getting debitted to stock and credit is happening in GR/IR for 11500. In PO , item level condition tab, PB00 is 10000, and JEXS(tax on PO) is 1500. But ir is not supposed to be like that - 1500 should go to CENVAT clearance , But data is not flowing from PO.. I wanr correct postings, pls provide me solution..
regards
B Shar

Hi
Can you check your condition type JEXS.....
Depending on the tax code in the PO item and the tax calculation schema, the system calculates the non-deductible tax portion and inserts it in the condition type with the category N. This category N will determine whether it is Non Deductable (Inventorised) or Individual Line Items (Not adding to Inventory).
I think in your case it is inventorising.

Similar Messages

  • How to do a clearance sale on a list of materials

    Hello,
    I got a request from our spare parts department that I'm not sure how to handle. They have a list of about 30 materials that they want to get rid of through a clearance sale. That is, they want to sell off all of the remaining stock of those materials at a discount. After the inventory is cleared, they want those parts to effectively become make-to-order parts, and they want to raise the price. So the parts are not being discontinued or obsoleted, just cleared from inventory.
    Does anyone have ideas on how we might configure this type of clearance sale? I looked into using promotions and sales deals, but they only seem to allow for sales based on a specified period, whereas we want the promotion to end based on when stock is depleted. I searched here and elsewhere for other ways of accomplishing this, but came up empty.
    Any help is greatly appreciated. BTW, we're on 4.6c.
    Regards,
    - Greg

    Good question. It doesn't look like there is a good option for clearance discount available (unless you're running Retail or are ready to invest in some additional "solution").
    Since it's only 30 materials, maybe the easiest way would be to create the new material records for them and move the stock to the new materials through inventory adjustment? This would affect the reporting but if you report by Product Hierarchy, that should still be good.
    I've noticed how in many stores when you buy a clearance item they actually have special barcodes on them. I.e. those are, essentially, not the "real" materials anymore.

  • Dissending customer open item clearance

    Dear All ,
    While doing customer open item clearance through F-32 ,   1st I will select total collection line item, then subsequent customer debit line item. System should accept open item clearance dissenting posting date wise other  error message will popup. So please give me advice for same
    regards
    purushottam

    hi
    thanx for reply   ..  we configured cash discount for customer base on Payment term . my question is while doing open item clearance payment againest customer debit clearing  in order by posting date. in case end user wrongly select in between date   system should stop running process .
    regards
    purushottam

  • Work Clearance Management ERROR

    Hi,
    I have configured WCM, now I have generated Maintenance Order and have also issued Permit against the same, now when i click WC Application in IW32 then click create, it is giving this ERROR --Error during loop using the internal table (L_WCCLTAB),  Error when executing function (WCFC_WCVLTAB_GET).
    Please Guide           
    Thanks
    DM

    Hello,
    I expect this is due to incomplete WCM print configuration.     
    Check IMG path: Work Clearance Management - Master Data - Print Control.
    -Paul

  • Should I buy this clearance G5 iMac?

    I'm in the market for a new Mac (my five-year-old Blueberry is starting to show its age). I was considering a Mini or an eMac, but then I found a place selling clearance iMacs.
    I can get a G5 iMac with a 17" monitor, 1.6GHz processor, 80 GB hard drive, model number M9248LL/A, OS X Panther, for a nice clearance price.
    Question is, is this a reliable machine? I'm guessing it's last year's model since it has 2004 software. Is this a first-generation G5 iMac that should be avoided? Should I get a new eMac or Mini, or go for this even though it's an older model?
    Thanks!
    Sue

    Sue: I read over the ad for this machine. My impression is that it is not refurished, though it's possible it may be a display model, i.e., "open box." I suppose it could also be a "return" item that someone who purchased and then returned it under the store's return policy. But the company does say that it tests the computer to ensure it is running ok, whatever that means. Do they power it up and ensure all apple software is there and then shut it down?
    Saving $400. is certainly a lot of money, esp. if you can get this beautiful machine for the same $ you could get the high end minimac. I also noticed that the ad says that some or all of the cd's may not be included. If that's the case then I would definitely think it's a returned machine. I have a Rev. A iMac I am thoroughly happy with and aside from some minor glitches, it has performed well. But many others had problems with Rev. A machines making lots of noises. If this is a returned machine which someone returned because it made too much noise, it may still work flawlessly but be aggravating. On the other hand, it may not have any problems at all.
    So, if you can call the company and ask specific questions about the machine, they may satisfy you into purchasing it. If not, perhaps getting a refurb from Apple might make better $$ sense. By the way, I read the one year warranty as being covered by Apple, not CompUSA. Hence, you should have no problem purchasing Applecare, which I wholly recommend since these machines aren't cheaply repaired. Either way you go I truly hope you enjoy yo0ur imac as much as I've enjoyed mine. walt
    PS: Since you will be doing some photo-editing, I recommend adding at least another 256 mb ram; the 256 ram for this machine is underpowered, hence the reason Apple now ships it's Rev B macs with 512mb. Of course, if you can afford to go with even more ram, that is better. I bought a 512 mb ram module from Crucial for about $70.

  • Following error/mech​anical axial clearance-​ solution: static friction compenasti​on?

    Hello,
    Firstly I would like to write something about the motion system which I use:
    -PXI 7344;
    -UMI 7764;
    -NI-Motion 6.0 (May 2003 Edition).
    -One of the stepper motor which I use has 1600 counts per revolution and it is connected with encoder which has 4000 counts per revolutions (these are settings which were set up in MAX). Between them is worm gear (gear ratio: 1/360). The encoder was fixed on axis of rotation of long arm and the motor was fixed on the other side of worm gear.
    Few days ago, I recorded data which describes current position of the arm (from encoder) and following error. And there is tiny problem which worry me a little bit: sometimes the value of following error is higher during the motion than in other iteration of movement. To describe this effect better I attached fragments of files at the end of this post (first columns describes current position and second column describes current value of following error). Move constraints in these two cases are the same: velocity 200 rpm, acceleration and deceleration 3 rps/s.
    I think that the reason for that type of situation is that there is a little mechanical axial clearance. In my opinion the solution for this should be use a static friction compensation (in axis settings->filter settings->enable static friction compensation, am I right? If so might you help me to set the proper values?
    With regards
    Peter
    1st file’s fragment (values of following error are acceptable)
    0 0
    0 1
    1 1
    3 4
    7 7
    26 9
    53 10
    97 11
    133 15
    185 16
    251 12
    325 8
    413 10
    498 9
    586 10
    663 18
    777 7
    925 10
    1049 7
    2nd file’s fragment (values of following error are not so good as they should be )
    0 0
    0 0
    0 1
    0 3
    0 5
    0 8
    0 13
    0 17
    0 20
    0 26
    0 34
    0 38
    0 45
    0 56
    0 65
    10 68
    17 76
    26 82
    52 81
    Many thanks

    Hello,
    It looks as though your system is experiencing an increasing following error until enough torque is provided to overcome inertia, so using static friction compensation may help your system. The deadzone values determine when the DAC output is enabled. The maximum deadzone position determines the error which must accumulate before the DAC begins generating a signal to reduce the error. The DAC remains active until the error is reduced to the minimum deadzone position or less. At that point, the DAC deactivates again. This is useful in determining a minimum following error before motion begins when starting a move and it also stops the motion when the difference between the current position and the target position is less than the minimum deadzone position value. This prevents your motor from slowly grinding against the static friction, which could result in damage to the motor or overheating.
    The offset voltage is a voltage boost that is added to the torque of the system and is used to overcome the inertia of the axis. I would suggest starting with the default values for the deadzone position values (5 and 10) and try a small offset voltage value (i.e. 0.1 V). From there, you can modify the offset incrementally until you achieve a system that does not experience the following errors that you listed.
    Try those steps and let me know if you have any additional questions on this issue.
    Regards,
    Scott R.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • 5 days ago I bought a 13" mac book air from an apple store.  It does NOT have Maverick on it!  I paid full price for it but since it has the old operating system-.I kind of feel like I purchased a "clearance" item but payed full price!  any advice?

    5 days ago I bought a 13" MacBook Air from an apple store.  It does not have Maverick on it!  I paid full price for it, but since it has the old operating system I kind of feel like I bought a "clearance" item but payed full price for it!  Does anyone have any advice, wisdom etc.  This is my first Mac and I'm really bummed that it's not the latest and greatest.  I know I can download maverick for free.....but are there other differences?  Maybe something else that I thought I was getting but didn't?  Thanks.

    There is no difference, you didnt get "shorted" Mavericks is a FREE DOWNLOAD
    Open the APP store and download Mavericks.
    You didnt buy a "clearance" item, you just got an Air that was there at the shop before Mavericks was released.
    There is no difference other than a 40 min. download.

  • Not issue permits until wcd(work clearance document) is tagged(issue is related to wcm)

    Hi All,
    I got a requirement from my client that user is unable to issue permits utill wcd is tagged. kindly suggest how is it possible

    Greetings Peter,
    I believe your requirement is that:
    no Approvals can be given on the WCA, until the WCD is in Tagged status ETG at least
    (and can have the relevant Approval?)
    To achieve this, you must define a Cross-Document Approval Process and an Approval Hierarchy.
    Create an approval such as "Tagged" in IPMD and assign it to the WA and WD objects under SPRO > Plant Maintenance and Customer Service > Work Clearance Management > Approvals > Assign Approval
    Create this Approval as "Mandatory", "Copy Automatically", "Issue Automatically" in IPMD.
    Under same parent node, Define Hierarchy for Approvals in such a way that the other Approvals you want to grant after Tagging only have a hierarchy level higher than "Tagged".
    Under same parent node, define Cross-document Approval Process, assigning the Approval "Tagged" to WA and WD, marking it as relevant to the process and set the process direction as going down from WA.
    This should allow you to meet this requirement, I think.
    You could also look at the node SPRO > Plant Maintenance and Customer Service > Work Clearance Management > Approvals > Block Issuing of Approvals > Define Dependent on System Status
    but I think it does not check the status cross-document, which is what you require.
    N.B. I think that actually if you have access to an IDES system, looking at the WCM setup for Plant 1000 there might be very helpful to you.
    More useful info for you:
    Work Clearance Management (PM-WCM) - SAP Library
    Approvals - Work Clearance Management (PM-WCM) - SAP Library
    Configurations necessary for WCM
    I hope you do find this useful and come back with any further questions or issues.

  • Automatic clearance of existing Credit memo from Lockbox

    Hi All,
    I am trying to implement a scenario where
    The credit memo is already existing in the system
    when user executes the uploads and executes the Lockbox file system should automatically clear the credit memo.
    Currently its just doubling the amount of credit and keeping in open items.
    At the EDI level we have manipulated the bank data and added 081 and moved the amount to -ve side (but this works fine when there is no credit memo )
    680000400007955000110001380729244           000017212                                  
    4800013    9240223423      00000000000000160000081                              
    4800014    9241457414      00000000000000088200081                              
    4800015    9241684533      00001617000000000000                                 
    4800016    9241794368      00009702000000000000                                 
    4800017    9241805197      00000000000000088200081  
    I am implementing the user exit FEBLB001 component EXIT_RFEBLB20_001              Lockbox Data
    Can anybody suggest what tweaks I should do in my user exit to achieve this automatic clearance of Credit memo
    Thanks
    Smita
    PS Help will definately be rewarded

    Hi Sridhar,
    thanks for your reply. The problem I am facing is that if the credit memo exist in system, i will post the amount once again, thus making total amount double.
    This is because of 081 and the imposing of -ve sign.
    Now this 081 is working fine when there is no credit memo. I want to manipulate the data at the user exit level if credit memo exist in the system. so that it will post and clear the credit memo.
    I believe I am clear with what I want to achieve
    Regards,
    Smita

  • Recipts with Clearance method by Automatic clearing are not cleared

    Hi,
    I have a receipt class with a clearance method 'By Automatic Clearing' and have the 'Clearing days' in the Remitance bank set to '1' day. When the receipts are remitted I am expecting them to be auto cleared after 1 day. But the receipts remain in the Remitted status. The receipts are getting clear only when i run the 'Automatic Clearing program' manually. Is this an expected functionality or am I missing any setups. Would appriciate a quick response.
    Thanks

    Please find the link to a similar question - Dispute Management - Correspondence with additional attachments
    I also remember running a program to re-trigger the standard actions to enable auto-creation of letters.
    In terms of actual actions - workflow can be triggered when an event takes place.

  • Where are defined in SAP bank clearance clauses / foreign currency payment?

    Hi All,
    with reference to foreign money transfer, I'd like to know where are defined in SAP the bank clearance clause (foreign currency payment).
    Thanks

    Hello,
    This is the classical payment medium payment program for Italy.
    You must have defined this in FBZP transaction code.
    Payment methods in country.
    Double click on your country & Payment method.
    You must have defined at
    Use classic payment medium programs (RFFO*)
    Base on this your file gets generated and saved on to a secured directory.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Clearance Charges in MIRO

    For Import PO scenario, I am posting two invoices for Clearance Charges for the same Vendor (only one condition maintained in PO for clearance charges).
    E.g
    rs 2000 clearance charges for 100 qty (in PO)
    I am posting first invoice of rs 1500 for 100 qty. again i am posting 2nd invoice of rs 500 for 100 qty. (Manual entries).
    Because of this there is diff. in GR and IR postings and while doing GR system automatically half the value and load it on material.
    Is there any setting wherein if i put 1500 rs in Miro system should automatically calculate qty 75. ?
    Kindly provide your valuable suggestions.
    regards

    in the PO you can call the same condition more than once
    call the condiiton twice and enter 1500 and 500.
    i haven't had a scenario like this but i think it should work pl test

  • WM inventory clearance created under which movt type 711-718

    Hi all,
    My client requirement is to see the WM inventory clearance created under which movt type 711-718.
    I have found the link in MSEG but to further segregate them i want (IM material document cliearance &
    item number )
      I have checked Bin Inv record but do not found,
    can any body tell me how to see the inventry clearance material document(in which table)

    Hi,
    WM inventory counting movement types are 711 for decrease differences and 712 for Increase differences.
    If you are facing problems in MSEG, try looking in transaction MB51 with the above movement types possibly with date ranges if you need.
    Amit G

  • Cross-company code clearance

    Dear Experts,
    Can anybody tell me the following requirement for our client ...
    In cross company code clearance, will it be possible to limit only TWO company codes, so that it would be easy for reconcile the accounts.
    Your early response is highly appreciated.
    Regards

    Hello,
    I am not able to understand your query. You may explain with a business case example to get better reply.
    The following text may be useful.
    Hello,
    You can post cross company code transactions, means first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Therefore, in first company code you need an offsetting entry to balance the document, in the same way in second company code you need an offsetting entry to balance the document. Therefore, you need to configure OBYA.
    You can post the cross company code postings even between two controlling areas. The system does not prevent to post documents between two company codes in two controlling area. Need not necessarily they should be under one operating concern. Provided you have to make sure that you have followed the following points:
    In OBY6 - To company codes must be assigned to same Company, meaning that you mus thave created a Company and that company must have been assigned to these two company codes.
    OBYA - You should maintain the clearing accounts in both the company codes. Meaning that you are posting one leg in one company code and the other leg in the other company. Therefore, it is required to have the missing legs in each company code.
    Company Code1 - Posting Key 40 - Clearing Account
    Company Code1 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
    Company Code2 - Positng Key 40 - Clearing Account
    Company Code2 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
    OB08 - In case if the two company codes have different local (company code) currencies, you may maintain the exchange rates.
    You can now go to F-02 and post a cross company code transaction giving the first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Missing leg in the first company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA and the missing leg in the second company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA. That means you will have four line items overall.
    The system will post three document.
    Document 1 in First Company Code
    Document 2 in Second Company Code
    and
    Document3 - Cross Company Code Document.
    The cross company code document consists of the first company code document number plus company code plus last two digits of the fiscal year.
    Hope this must have clarified your doubts.
    Please let me know in case if you need further details.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Net groups clearances not saved! 10.1 PP

    I have created a net group in MS with serveral nets.  The track width is 20 and the clearances are left blank.  Forward annotation to UB adds the the group to the net list and in the spreadsheet the trace width and clearances all default to "use group settings".  I edit the clearances in the group editor to 75 for all and changes the clearances in the spreadsheet to 10.  the layout works as expected, I get 10 mills for traces within the group and 75 mill for the group to non-group net.
    If I close and open UB, edit a trace in the group or make a forward annotation the net clearances is the spreadsheet default back to "use group settings".  Verry annoying!  I also tried adding the clearances to the spreadsheet in MS but is seems to have no effect.  Not all the field in MS seem to transfer toUB.
    Any Ideas are appreciated.

    Hey,
    Have you encountered this in Multisim 12 by any chance? I'm just trying to replicate this and it seems all the net changes to clearances  pass along fine.
    Regards,
    Miguel V
    National Instruments

Maybe you are looking for