GR Non valuated

I have to receive the stock to sloc and then issue goods to process order. But I would not pay for this stock and the one to whom the GI is made, is reponsible for his own account.
Now, how do I tackle this scenario. Will GR non valuated in PO solve the purpose. If this will, my doubt is how would the invoice be sent to the one how made the process order. Any suggestions please.

HI,
I will make a PO and receive goods (100) from vendor. I will stock this material (100) with me and issue goods (50) to some other fellow in my company.
Its look like a consignment PO of vendor where vendor keep his stock at company premised and you have to pay him when you receive stock at your own
you have to follow some SAP stander process for that
check following link
[Consignment scenario ???;
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/af3c415e5dde2be10000000a1550b0/content.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale
Edited by: kailasugale on Dec 1, 2011 10:30 AM

Similar Messages

Intrastat - Inbound/Outbound of non valuated materials used in production.

Hello everyone,
I've found several threads and very useful posts (ex: Re: PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting) regarding similar issue, but the solution proposed was manual input, therefore not answering totally to my client requirement.
I am actually performing maintenance activities and there is this new business process, I have been searching for the correct understandind of this process regarding intrastat here and I haven't found.
So i will describe the process hoping that someone can give me some hint:
Vendor A
Customer B
Raw Material R
Finish Product P
Service S
1. So we ( Vendor A ) receive raw material from our Customer B (+mov.type +)
2. We ( Vendor A ) with a production order process the Raw material R into Finish Product P.
3. We ( vendor A ) send the Finish Product P back to the Customer B.
4. We ( Vendor A ) then issue an invoice for the Service S to the Customer B.
5. It can occur that we Vendor A, can send back the Raw material R which was not manufactured back to Customer B (with a mov type.)
So thiswas the scenario and how the process is beeing done, and the client understanding is:
- As far as i understood, (please correct me if i am wrong) the Raw Material R must be declared (Quantity and statistic value) in Purchasing Intrastat, in the transactions where the Vendor A receives the raw material and as well in the case that they send it back to Customer B.
- Regarding the Invoice from the Vendor A to Customer B, the Raw Material R is incorporated in the Finish Product P, therefore I've been told that, the Statistic Value determined in the invoice in this situation has to include the cost value of the raw materials R.
My issues in MM are the following:
1 - If Raw Material R is non valuated, how can i maintain its statistic value to be declared, in inbound as well outbound? as an Info-record?
My issues in SD are the following:
1 - If the Statistic Value GRWR can be for example 102% calculated over the net value, and if the cost value of Raw Materials R are to be included, so i would have to add them somehow to the statistic value.
In this case the question comes up, where do i maintain the value of the raw materials R, and how to add it to the statistic value automatically ?
Regarding what is implemented in this client, they have SD intrastat running, but not MM intrastat was implemented.
Feedback would be highly appreciated!!
Thank you in advance.

Hi Sergio,
I have this exact same requirement but on a bigger scale.
The complexities are:
1. The raw material which client use, that can be either supplied by customer or can be procured by client. Remember, customer's raw material and my externally procured raw material is exactly same in all properties.
2. There are many customers who send same exact raw material.
Requirements:
1. Client wants to use same material codes (for raw materials and even for finished products) for normal production cycle and for Job work cycle. Master data needs to be the same, and data need to be separated at transaction level.
2. Whatever raw material client gets from customer, its statistical value should be entered at the time of goods receipt.
Please suggest if preference processing can handle this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

FI MM integration _ Non valuated GRN

Hi
In FI MM integration if you acquire an asset through PO the asset value gets captured automatically.
For single asset - One PO one asset - there is no problem - at the time of MIGO (Goods receipt) the GRN becoems "valuated" and asset get the value automatically.
For multiple account assignement - One PO - MORE THAN ONE ASSETS - the GRN becomes "non valuated " (automatically- the field is grayed out). The account document will not be generated. The asset value will be captured on the MIRO date.
1) Would it be a good practice? Ideally asset value date should be GRN date ..
2) If anyone has worked on this - pl. guide me as to how can i valuate the GRN for multiple account assignment.
regd
Vedavatee

Yes Veda,
When you have multi account assignement in PO, GRN Non-valuated option automatically de-activated (greyd out).
ME23N - Item data - Delivery - GR Non-Valuated
This is Standard SAP behaviour.
At the time MIRO, the entry will post as per the Account assignment given in PO - Splitting structure.
There is no other way to do it.
PO - Multi account assignment - GRN Non-valuated.........This is right approch as of today
You are correct, go ahead
Thanks

What is diff b/w valuated and non valuated

hi
can anybody tell me what is difference between valuated salesorder and nonvaluated saled order stock
thanks
prasad

Hi,
While creating the Sales order, system explore the BOM for that FERT. Say, I add one more extra component in sales order which is not been maintained in BOM or which has not been valuated for Std cost estimate for that FERT material. This extra component is call it as Non-valuated sales order stock. All other, valuvaed materials are valuated sales order stock.
Hope, it helps!

Storage Location for NON valuated material in MIGO

Hi friends ,
I have created a purchase order for NON-Valuated material (UNBW) with Account Assignment "K".I did check the material type UNBW configuration where only Value Update is checked for my Plant.
Now at the time of MIGO , system is asking for Storage lcoation (mandatory) and after MIGO system also updates quantity in Storage Location entered in MIGO.
while in normal cases (like ROH material type) , if we create Account Assigned PO ( like K) , system neither ask for Storage lcoation at the time of MIGO , nor system updates Qty at any storage location.
As per my understanding , if we create Purchase Order with account assignment K , system updates value in consumption and doesn't update Qty in stock (although material is stockable) .....which is simply like immediately issue of material to cost center.
Therefore wondering why system is updating Qty for NON-VALUATED material.
Does non valuated material means , POST value to Cost center (for account assignment K) and Update Qty in stock ?
Like in case of Account Assignment , value gets charged to WBS and qty gets updated as special stock "project"
All replies are welcome .....
Regards
Shrey

By definition UNBW's are ony qty updating and have no value assoicated with them. Since the system needs to stock this qty somewhere it by deafult asks for a Sloc.

Difference between Valuated and Non valuated Sale order stock

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me the difference between the above said subject with the steps involved in each scenario.
That is valuated sale order stock and Non valuated sale order stock in Product cost by Sale Order.
With Journal entries at each step and whether any WIP or variances at Production order level and sale order level and all the financial entries related to them
Thanks in Advance,
Ravi Kumar

Hi Shail,
Thans for your inputs,
But I wanted to know it in more detail. In what scenarios they are used with financial entries in both the cases.
I will give you my scenario. It goes like this,
My client is in pipe coating business, who receives pipes from customers and does only coating work(which is considered as service) and despatches it to the customer. this process is carried on the basis of work order(Sale order).
Now Production order is created and work is done on that with reference to Sale order for that particular customer.
So the pipe which my client receives should be non valuated stock as it will not be a raw material to them and the cost incurred on it is booked on production order like chemicals as raw material consumption, activity cost etc.
now in this scenario just tell me how and at which stage FI entries get generated at Production order and Sale order level, and also at wat level Standard cost estimate should be created i,e at production order level or sale order level(sale order cost estimate).
Will there be any entries at goods isssue and GR against production order. If no then how the COGM account will get hit.
Please tell me this scenario in both cases Valuated sale order stock and Non valuated sale order stock with financial entries in Sale order costing.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Kumar

"GR", "GR non-valuated", and "IR"?

Dear Gurus,
What determines whether we can change the "GR", "GR non-valuated", and "IR" indicators in the purchase order?
Thanks...

hi,
Settings:
1. PO field settings
2. Account assignment settings
Regards
Priyanka.P

Use of GR receipt , IR receipt and GR - non valuated options in PO

I want to know what is the use and effect of GR receipt , IR receipt and GR - non valuated options in PO.
Pls help.

Hi
GR-Non valuated:
Set the indicator if goods receipts involving this material are not to be valuated. The valuation of the purchase order item will then take place at the time of invoice verification.
This indicator must be set in the case of multiple account assignment for example.
IR receipt:
Specifies whether an invoice receipt is linked to the purchase order item.
You can not do LIV if this indicator is set.
If the indicator is not set, the goods are to be delivered free of charge.
Goods Receipt;
Specifies whether a goods receipt is linked to the purchase order item.
You can not do GR if you set this indicator.
If GR indicator is set, GR-non valuated Indicator also need to be set.
Cheers!
***reward If Useful (RIU)

Very Urgent--- How to Convert Non Valuated stk into Valuated

Dear GURU'S
Actually for a material A when i see the stock in MM03 in accounting tab i see less stock then when i see in MMBE
i.e in MMBE if i select Material A and Plant B(Which is depo in my case) i see stock as 39
but for same material MAterial A and Plant B ,if i see in MM03 --in accounting tab i m able to see less stock i.e only 1
============================================
Well the problem is In MM03 I cud see only valuated stk i.e qty as 1
And in MMBE for a partiocular material for a particular plant the stock was 39
i.e Here i am getting Valuated + Non valuated stock
i.e i am getting difference of 25
=====>>>
To get into the root cause
I have gone to MB5B where i can get all the transaction that has been done on this material with movement type also i got the intial stock ,Goods recpt ,Goods issu and total stock
No for a particular material
In MB5B it is showing
Stock on 01.01.2005    = 38
receipts total               = 238
Issues total                  =237
Stock as on 18.02.2008 = 39(which is equal to Stock in MMBE)
=============>This is for valuated +Non valuated stock
Where as if i want to see only valuated stock it was showing
receipts total      = 238
Issues total         =237
Stock as on 18.02.2008 =1 (which is equal to stock in acctg view in MM03)
====================>This is only for Valuated Stock
======================================
Now how to solve this :
The initial qty(38) which has been posted it was at the begining that is at the start of the project
And the people who have posted it ,it was non valuated
that is the reason it is showing difference in MM03 and MMBE
First thing
How can i see on which date this initial stock has been posted
Second Query
How to convert this non valuated stock into Valuated stock
So that the quantity in MMBE and MM03 gets matched
Willl award 10 Points if my problem gets solved
THANKZ IN ADVANCE
REgds
Shailesh

Dear friend
Actuallly i have checked the history of that particular Item in MB51
I have gone through all the documents created for this material
Now this material also exist in DEPO which is located at chennai and plant is at mumbai
So Initially in the year-2006(31-10-2006) whater documents are created i.e STOP has been created and delivery has been made (Mov type-601)
are non valuated stock ,means they have been posted without any valuation
But from year 2007(01.02.2007) the documents whiohc have been posted are valuated
i.e is the reason when i am executing transaction MRN9 to check the history of valuated stock
I cant see non valuated stock
Well now how to do the valuation of this stock which have been posted in year 2006 so that
In MMBE and MM03 there is no difference of stock
Plz hepl
regds
shailesh

PO with Account Assignment P and NON Valuated Material

Hi ,
As per my undersatnding if I create a PO with Account Assignment "P" , system consumes it immediately and stock doesn;t get updated in any storage location.
But
If I use Account Assignment "P" with "NON valuated" stock , system is asking for Slocation at the time of MIGO and also updates Qtys in Storage location , although cost is being booked to consumption account.
Could u pls help to understand the logic for this ?
Regards
Shrey

Hi,
PLease read this para from SAP help .. it is useful to undestand your scenarion
Goods Receipt of Non-Valuated Materials
Use
If the stock of a given material is only managed on a quantity basis, an account assignment must be defined in the purchase order. However, this account assignment does not result in the goods receipt being posted to consumption/usage. Instead, it results in the costs being debited to the account assignment object.
The goods receipt is posted to the warehouse stock, thus increasing the unrestricted-use stock of the material.
*It is not possible to post goods receipts of non-valuated materials directly into consumption/usage. You have to post the goods receipt into the warehouse first and then enter a goods issue.*
Regards
Krishna

Sales Order -Valuated, non valuated

Hi,
I am getting an error while saving a sales order containing Variant Configured Material. The Error description is " Sales Order is non valuated".
Where do we make the config settings regarding valuation of a Sales order?i.e.valuated or non valuated? Is this valuation of Sales order controlled at item category level?
Regards

Hi Mrinal,
Following links may help you :--
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/90/ba6cba446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/90/ba6cba446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_pserv464/helpdata/EN/90/ba6db1446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://www.siliconlabs.fi/files/SL_SD_ACCT/SL_SD_Accounting.html
Thanks & Regards
Rajesh

Open Prod. Orders = Convert Non-Valuated material to Valuated material

Hello,
We have converted from Non-Valuated Materials to Valuated manterials in Stock.
But now, we are concerned with Open Production Orders - which have Non-Valuated Materials already issued to the order.
We would like to find out how do other companies handle this type of scenario.
Is there a tool or program that can be used, please advice.
Many thanks in advance,

Rio,
We have used Production orders when we want to convert 1 material number to another material number. It is a good & robust process. It allows the business to capture the cost of converting 1 material to another material with all the labor and or machine costs.
In your case I assume you may be using an unvaluated material as component & adding some labor or machine time to arrive at your Valuated material. Seems like a normal & straightforward process.
Anothe option is to do a standard Transfer posting using Material to material transfer ( mov type 309). It allows to transfer post materials that have same material type. But you may have to check if it allows to convert unvaluated (UNBW) to unvaluated (HALB) material type or not.
But fisrt option is a good process.
Hope this helps. Good luck.
Ramm

Stock Transport for Non Valuated Account Assigned Material

Hi Experts,
I have to satisfy some unique requirement from my demanding FICO team to make certain process work our way.
Following is the scenario...
1. Plant A and plant B belongs to the same company.
2. Plant A makes material X (non valuated, ind/coll indicator = 1).
3. X calls for sub-assembly Y (non valuated, ind/coll indicator = 1) which is a make item in plant B. X and Y belongs to different Profit Centers
4. Sales order placed at plant A for material X.
5. MRP runs and creates a stock transport order in plant A to buy the non valuated material Y from plant B. STO is account assigned to the sales order.
6. Plant B makes the material Y by creating a production order that is account assigned to the same sales order and does PGI to ships it out to plant A.
7. Plant A GRs the material Y and this puts it in sales order stock. No value move, just qty move. Also no FI document created.
8. Plant A issues component Y to the production order created for material X. Cost of Y doesn't show up in the production order as it is non valuated.
9. Upon settlement of the production order in Plant B, the ACTUAL cost gets settled to the sales order in plant A. So at the time of settlement the profit center switch happens for Y (i.e. the profit center for Y changes to match X's profit center)
This is a beautiful process from logistics point of view. BUT, my FICO has unique requirement for inter company sales for our organization. For them to consider a process as inter company sales, the following constraints has to be met...
1. Ownership of material remains with producing profit center until consumption by the receiving object. (with the above mentioned process the profit center switch happens during prod. order settlement)
2. Cost for the consuming profit center will be moving average, standard cost or planned cost. (we are dealing with non-valuated materials and the settlement happens at actual cost)
I need your expertise to help me define a work aroud. I am thinking about a lot of options to somehow make it work but can't seem to get solutions. Following are my thoughts...
1. Is it possible to possible to make the settlement with planned cost instead of actual cost?
2. Is it possible to make a profit center switch during consumption rather during settlement?
3. Is it somehow possible to create an underlying FI document during GR at plant A? (I know SAP does not create a FI doc. for non valuated materials).
4. Or can plant B send an invoice to plant A for the STO? (I believe this can be done for cross-company STO) I am thinking doing an Invoice Receipt at plant A instead of doing a settlement might show up the cost for Y in the production order for X.
An IR with the planned cost would be an awesome solution to get the buy-in from FICO. Can this be done?
I hope you don't mind my lengthy message... Waiting for some positive response.
Thanks.

Anyone??? This is kinda urgent?

STO non valuated material

Dear Experts,
We are doing asset transfer as a non valuated material , We have created non valuated material with assasable value and trasfering from one plant to another plant with sto route . create sto in receiving plant , create outbound delivery , post goods issue , excise invoice , but when i'm receving material at the time of GR i'm entering excise invoice number excise dutys comming fine .But system is geving error vendor excise details not maintained.
This is only happening for non valuated material other materials its working fine.

Thanks to all ,
It is possible to get excise duty's for non valuated material at the time of GR only with assassable value.
I got it any way thanks to all
Edited by: chandu on Dec 30, 2010 5:12 AM
Edited by: chandu on Dec 30, 2010 5:13 AM

When posting GI for Non valuated material in Delivery geting error (M8147)

Hi Experts
We have a problem that we are trying to send a material from one plant in one company code to another plant in another company code (Inter Company Stock Transfer Order). The material is of type Non Valuated (So it has no valuation class). The PO Order type used and the PO account assignment category is of type saying GR Non Valuated.
Problem is in the outbound delivery (movement type 645 determined) when posting GI do we get a account determination error (M8147 = Account determination for entry 1000 GBB Z001 not possible), saying that no account could be determined.
Our understanding is that the GI for the delivery demands a Valuation, which we can not do as the material is NON Valuated.
How to set the GI non valuated for the outbound delivery, so we can avoid this error? please help
BR

>
Krishna Rao wrote:
> We assigned the GL for GBB in OBY. But, still the error is coming. Is there any other setup we need to do for Non Valuated material to post goods issue from delivery?
I cant believe that the same error message is coming up after the maintenance.
you either maintained an entry at a wrong level within GBB or the message must have changed.
Make sure that you take any information of this message into account (even the spaces)
the message is certainly not like you posted here: Account determination for entry 1000 GBB Z001 not possible
the message carries 4 variables , not only 3

Make-to-order: COPS for KMAT materials (Non-valuated sales stock)

Hello,
We are working with KMAT configurable material (i.e. non valuated sales order stock).
The client is requiring that inventory of these KMAT material should be shown in the financial accounting;however as we work with KMAT, this seems not possible.
The whole process is:
- taking of the sales order with the configuration
- MRP and Production order Execution
- Settlement of the PO to the sales order
- Settlement of the Sales orden to a given account in FI (just like "stock for customer order") - inventory.
The problem we are facing now is how to make the compensation of this account once the product is delivered.
It seems the sales order's default settlement receiver is only the PSG. can we have to use the result analysis key to calculate the cost of sales, and which valuation method can we use if I only want to settle the actual cost that settled from the production order.
By the way, I have search for the notes:Note 26459 it seems we have to run the sales cost estimate first for the KMAT.
Summary
Symptom
It is not possible to perform results analysis on sales order items with materials of material type KMAT.
Additional key words
Transactions KKA3, KKAK
Cause and prerequisites
In make-to-order production, the inventory and the cost of sales are not posted through goods movements because the materials are managed in a non-valuated sales order stock. The only way to create postings in FI is to use results analysis (see Note 26456). If the sales order item consists of a material of material type KMAT, results analysis is not possible because no cost estimate exists for this material.
Solution
Results analysis must be performed with a valuation method that uses profit basis C. With this profit basis, the system uses the planned costs of the production orders for the sales order instead of a cost estimate for the KMAT material.
In Release 2.2 a modification is needed for this which is described in Note 25772. In Release 3.0 this function is provided as standard.
From 3.0C onwards the planned costs of the sales order can also be calculated in a product cost estimate for the sales order. You should use profit basis E in this case.
However, if you are using assembly processing with production orders, you can only use profit basis C.
Hope the scenario is clear. Perhaps you have a different approach to work with KMAT materials.
Regards

Hi Friends,
Can you please provide the solution for my problem and its slight urgent.
Regards
Goutham

GR Non valuated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for