Greater than 4GB on 10G R2

Anyone have a document that explains how to configure AWE Memory Support for 10G R2 on Windows 2003 Server?
Or can anyone guide me on how to do this?

Do you know where to find & how to set this registry parameter?
It talks about this in that link you gave me but doesn't elaborate enough!
My db_blocksize= 8192 and the server has 16GB Ram.
"AWE_WINDOW_MEMORY, a new registry parameter specific to VLM, tells Oracle Database how much of its address space to reserve for mapping in database buffers. It defaults to a value of 1 GB, which should be suitable for most installations. If DB_BLOCK_SIZE is large, however, the default AWE_WINDOW_MEMORY value of 1 GB may not be sufficient to start the database."

Similar Messages

Formatting external drive for read/write PC/Mac & files greater than 4GB

I'm on Snow Leopard and deliver an external drive off-site to a video editor who needs to read/write to the drive and return the edited files and then I need to read/write all over again. All video files are greater than 4GB. How would I go about this? Third party applications like MacDrive create too much overhead when processing video files. FAT32 limits file sizes to 4GB.

Hi WillDuffy;
Your requirement of files greater than 4GB eliminates FAT.
In your case since you don't have access to the PC, I am afraid you are forced to use the NTFS. This will require you to use the reverse engineered effort called NTFS-3G to be able to write to the disk from your Mac. Sorry.
Allan
Message was edited by: Allan Eckert

Is there replacement for (less than) and (greater than) in Oracle 10g?

Hi,
In the User Java Application using Oracle's > (less than) or > (greater than) is not working.
Can anyone help me onthis for any feature in Oracle 10g instead of using less than or greater than
Thanks and Regards

Hi,
What do yyou mean by "it's not working"?
Maybe you could use sign function, instead.
with t as (select 2 x, 3 y from dual union all
           select 2 x, 1 y from dual union all
           select 2 x, 2 y from dual)
select t.*
from t
where sign(y - x) = - 1;
         X          Y
         2          1
1 row selected.Regards
Peter

MP4 encodes fail when output size is greater than 4GB, AME CC 2014.2 (8.2.054)

I have a jpeg image sequence about 45 min long at 30fps.
Using AME CC (7.2.2.29) I can successfully encode to MP4, CBR at 18 Mbps. File size is about 5.53 GB.
Using AME CC 2014.2 (8.2.054), with the identical preset (migrated directly from previous AME), the resulting file is unplayable.
AME CC 2014 gives following warning at the end of the encode:
- Source File: /Volumes/LS-GRAID-8TB-1/DDL_video/Output/1_Frames/2_Current/102-204-C01-CallanderVeryGold _16bit/102-204-C01-CallanderVeryGold_16bit_[00000-82441].jpg
- Output File: /Volumes/LS-GRAID-8TB-1/DDL_video/Output/2_Encode/1_Review/102-204-C01-CallanderVeryGold_ 16bit.mp4
- Preset Used: DDL-MP4-CBR18
- Video: 1920x1080 (1.0), 30 fps, Progressive, 00:45:48:02
- Audio:
- Bitrate: CBR, Target 18.00 Mbps
- Encoding Time: 00:55:28
01/19/2015 03:33:17 PM : File Encoded with warning
Adobe Media Encoder
Could not write XMP data in output file.
When I either reduce the bit rate OR reduce the work area, so that the final output file is under 4GB (or more specifically, under approximately 4,096,000,000 bytes), I do not get the XMP warning, and the final file is playable.
Again, please note that the previous version of AME CC does not have this problem when using an identical preset on identical source, so it does not seem to be a problem with the source frames or the output format chosen, it seems to be an issue with the current build of AME.
Is there a solution to this issue?
thanks

I have had the exact same problem, I am now trying to encode with audio. ( I also did not need audio ).
My file size and bit rate is a little higher . and using VBR not CBR but it is a mp4 encode and exact same problem, unplayable.
I am now trying an encode with audio on at lowest possible rate, to see if it assembles the video correctly.
I can confirm the work around, With AUDIO on, the export works.
BTW: also tried the sequence directly in Premiere 2014.2 and same error.
-----:LOG:-----
03/06/2015 08:19:46 AM : Queue Started
- Source File:Adobe Premier Edit_1.prproj
- Output File: FullRez1080_59.94fps_VBR10-50_noAudio.mp4
- Preset Used: Custom
- Video: 1920x1080 (1.0), 59.94 fps, Progressive, 02;53;33;46
- Audio:
- Bitrate: VBR, 1 pass, Target 10.00 Mbps, Max 50.00 Mbps
- Encoding Time: 03:40:33
03/06/2015 12:00:19 PM : File Encoded with warning
Adobe Media Encoder
Could not write XMP data in output file.
03/06/2015 10:12:51 PM : Queue Started
- Source File: Adobe Premier Edit_6.prproj
- Output File:FullRez1080_59.94fps_VBR_20-50.mp4
- Preset Used: Custom
- Video: 1920x1080 (1.0), 59.94 fps, Progressive, 02;53;33;14
- Audio: AAC, 16 kbps, 8 kHz, Mono
- Bitrate: VBR, 1 pass, Target 20.00 Mbps, Max 50.00 Mbps
- Encoding Time: 05:11:45
03/07/2015 03:24:36 AM : File Successfully Encoded
Machine:
Mac Pro 6,1
12-Core Intel Xeon E5
64GB RAM

[10g] Way to find least value greater than a value?

I have a simple (I think) question ...
Part 1:
Is there a way to determine the least value, among a set of values, that is greater than 0?
A couple of examples:
Set of values:
{0,1,2,3}
Return value:
1
Set of values:
{0,5,10,20,100}
Return value:
5
Set of values:
{1,4,9,11}
Return value:
1Part 2:
Same thing, but greater than some given value, not necessary 0.
Set of values:
{0,1,2,3}
Parameter value:
2
Return value:
3
Set of values:
{0,5,10,20,100}
Parameter value:
2
Return value:
5
Set of values:
{1,4,9,11}
Parameter value:
2
Return value:
4In particular, I'm looking for an efficient way of doing this. I believe I can do it with a set of CASE statements, but it gets really complex the more values you are comparing.
My first thought was to use the LEAST function, but that doesn't allow me a way to use a parameter.
Any suggestions?

-- this section has been edited
And that's basically where I was heading. I was hoping there was a less complex way to do it... somehow replacing any zeros with an impossibly large number, without using case statements (something equivalent to the NVL function, but to replace any value with another), so that they'd never be less than anything, and then I could just use the LEAST function. The only way I can think of to do that though, would be to convert the numbers to strings, use REPLACE, and then convert them back to numbers, which doesn't seem less complex than the CASE statements, and most likely is worse performance-wise.
For example:
SELECT     ord_nbr
,     seq_nbr
,     time_spent /
     CASE     WHEN     comp_qty     <= plan_qty
          AND     comp_qty     <> 0
          THEN     comp_qty
          WHEN     comp_qty     > plan_qty
          THEN     LEAST     ( TO_NUMBER(REPLACE(TO_CHAR(ord_qty-scrap_qty),'0','999999999'))
                    , TO_NUMBER(REPLACE(TO_CHAR(plan_qty),'0','999999999'))
                    , TO_NUMBER(REPLACE(TO_CHAR(comp_qty),'0','999999999'))
          ELSE 1
     END     AS unit_time
FROM     ord_detail
;-- end of section edited (I posted before I had fully gone through the solution provided)
I checked the data, and though, theoretically all values could be zero, there are no instances where that happens. I think that, in the case all values were 0, I'd just want to use 1 instead.
Side note on the "big" problem behind this question....
My ultimate problem, (and if I end up needing help with that, I'll start a new post for it) is that the quantity data in our system has a fair amount of junk in it...values that can't be true. With this solution, I would assume that in any case where the quantity complete at a given step of a process is less than or equal to the quantity planned to be complete at that step, the value is good, which is not necessarily a correct assumption. Then, only in cases where something can't be true, like when quantity complete > the quantity planned, are when I would intervene with this solution to make a "best guess" at the correct value. There a few things related to this that I have to determine before I can figure out my next step.
We have another database (so we can keep things straight, I'll call the database I've been querying up til now DB1, and this other one, DB2) that has much more reliable quantity data and step data (sometimes it has steps that aren't in DB1) but its structure is complex, I'm rather unfamiliar with it, and it does not have time spent data. Additionally, some products have all their information in DB1, and none in DB2.
So my options are to:
1) ...try to learn the structure of the other database, find the data I need, and query both databases together, using this thread's solution to resolve any questionable data that does not exist in both systems, and skipping any steps that occur in DB2, but not DB1 (since they won't have any time data, which is ultimately what I'm after)
2) ...try to come up with a method to pre-"scrub" my data in DB1, based on some logical assumptions and looking at all steps in an order, so that I can then just query the scrubbed data...
3) ...use the solution from this thread, and assume that the bad data isn't enough to significantly impact my calculations...
What I wouldn't give for a single system with all good data!
Edited by: user11033437 on Nov 19, 2010 4:21 PM

Query to select values greater than, where AS clause is used

Oracle 10g
Requesting your help in writing the query correctly.
I have the following 2 tables. The AddProjectPhase and AddProject tables. It is many to many relationship. Each project can have a predefined set of 4 different phases under it. Each phase has a start date and an end date. I am writing a report to get the phases which have a duration greater than, for example, 3 months.
The query below is working fine to just display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase. I am not able to modify it to select the phases which have a duration, for example, 3 or more months.
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECT"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJNAME" VARCHAR2(60),
     "PROJSTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PROJSTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDDATE" DATE,
     "PROJENDTYPE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDREASON" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "UCPROJECTMANAGER" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PARENTPROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_B36" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJID", "PROJHIDDENDATE") ENABLE
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECTPHASE"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJPHASEID" NUMBER(9,0),
     "PHASESTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PHASEENDDATE" DATE,
     "RRDATE" DATE,
     "PHASENAME" VARCHAR2(30),
     "PROJPHASESTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "REVIEWCOMMENTS" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "ISUEVALUATION" NUMBER(1,0),
     "SOLUTIONINGTEAMINVOLVEMENT" NUMBER(1,0),
     "ISUNAME" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_A63" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJPHASEID") ENABLE
   )Below is the query to display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase which is working fine.
SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename",
pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate",
pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate",
pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus",
ap.projID "projID",
ap.projName "projName",
ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate",
ap.projStartDate "projStartDate",
CASE
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    ELSE null
END "phaseMonths"
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
ORDER BY ap.projIDHowever the modified query shown below to select all the phases greater than, for example, 3 months, is resulting in
ORA-00904: "PHASEMONTHS": invalid identifier SELECT pp.phaseName, pp.phaseStartDate, pp.phaseEndDate
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
AND PhaseMonths IN
(SELECT
(CASE
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
ELSE null
END) AS PhaseMonths
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate)
ORDER BY ap.projID

Looking for this?
select *
   from (
        SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename"
          , pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate"
          , pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate"
          , pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus"
          , ap.projID "projID"
          , ap.projName "projName"
          , ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate"
          , ap.projStartDate "projStartDate"
          , CASE WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL     THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 ELSE null
            END "phaseMonths"
          FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
         WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
           AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
         ORDER
            BY ap.projID
where "phaseMonths" >= 3

Any way to create tablespace with name greater than 30 characters ?

Is there any way to create tablespace greater than 30 characters on solaris 10 and Oracle 10g. Any way ? because i have no other option.

desc dba_tablespaces
So clearly the answer is NO.
Tablespace names are invisible and irrelevant. Why the question?

[SOLVED]Can't add files larger than 4GB in K3b

Hi. I wanted to burn a file over 4 GB on a DVD5 today in K3b. No luck. When adding a file which is greater than 4.0GB, I am being told I should use mkisofs >=2.01.01a33 / genisoimage >=1.1.4.
K3b says my mkisofs is 2.1, and my genisoimage is 1.1.9. (checked via genisoimage --version)
I am sure it is going to fit on a DVD5, I split my file in WinRAR so that it would fit DVD5 size perfectly. I did some googling, tried changing parameters, and still no luck. I can workaround this by doing
genisoimage -allow-limited-size filename > isoname.iso
But obviously that's not what I want. Any ideas?
PS.: k3b 1.66.0alpha2-3, cdrkit 1.1.9-2
PPS.: Looks like nobody cares:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour … bug/398626
Bug #398626 reported by martinpm24 on 2009-07-13
Last edited by warnec (2009-09-21 16:33:50)

ugkbunb wrote:
warnec wrote:
So, if I understand that correctly, cdrkit doesn't support >4GB files, and cdrtools does?
How do I switch to cdrtools, then? I suppose cdrkit and cdrtools are conflicting with each other.
And I can't remove cdrkit because dvd+rw-tools depends on it. Will dvd+rw-tools works with cdrtools as well?
There is also something called "dvdrtools" in /extra, described as:
"A fork of cdrtools, with the primary goal of supporting writable DVD drives"
Of course, I've got a DVD drive, so if it would support my drive better than cdrtools, I'll give it a shot. But will it support >4GB files as cdrtools does?
sudo pacman -Rd cdrkit
yaourt -S cdrtools
I am 99% sure dvd+rw-tools should work with cdrtools... I would try out cdrtools first... then if it doesn't work for you perhaps then try out dvdrtools... it is IIRC just a fork of cdrtools... cdrtools is able to burn DVD just fine here.
Followed the steps here, didnt work.
When I yaourt -S cdrtools, it just installs cdrkit-1.1.9-2 , and k3b is still unable to burn >4Gb dvds. These are the kind of things that kill the user experience in our OS.
Its real sad, im using a windows app through wine to burn dvd's.

Parse an XML of size greater than 64k using DOM

Hi,
I had a question regarding limitation of parsing a file of size greater than 64k in Oracle 10g. Is the error "ORA-31167: XML nodes over 64K in size cannot be inserted" related to this ?
One of the developers was telling that if we load an XML document of size greater than 64k into Oracle DOM, it will fail. Is 64k the size of the file or the size of text node in the XML?
Is there a way we can overcome this limitation?
I believe that Oracle 11g R1 documentation states that existing 64k limitation on the size of a text node has been eliminated. So if we use Oracle 11g, does it mean we can load XML files of size greater than 64K (or XML having text nodes of size greater than 64k)
I am not well versed with XML. Please help me out.
Thanks for your help.

Search this forum for the ORA-error.
Among others it will show the following: Node size
In this case I think we can assured that "a future release" in 2006 was 11.1 as mentioned by Mark (= Sr Product Manager Oracle XML DB)

Oracle 9,2.0 32 bit for Solaris can not access more than 4GB?

I am sorry to ask rather stupid question.
I joined company which has big SUN Fire running Solaris 9 64bit version.
It has system memory 16GB and 8 CPUs.
I found 8GB memory reported as free. It is production box. It is heavy loaded.
I guess Kernel parameter settings for Oracle set too low.
I reported DBA and asked DBA to improve.
My DBA said Oracle 32 bit version was installed and Oracle 32bit can't access more than 4GB system memory.
Is it true that Oracle 9.2.0 32bit for Solaris can not access more than 4GB memory?
32bit CPU and 32bit OS might have problem in access big memory.
But I never heard Oracle 9 running on 64bit Solaris box can not access more than 4GB.
Specially on Sparc 64bit chip and Solaris 9 64bit version.
I searched forums and could not find good answer. I believe it is rather obvious.
Please help me on this. I will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Message was edited by:
user524303

I was really surprised by the fact that almighty
ORACLE can not access 4GB memory.
So, it is true that 32bit Oracle is limited by 4GB RAM.Nope. 32bit almighty anything is limited to (max) 2^32 virtual adresses on a vmm system.
Often there is also some split where memory is divided into system and user areas, where user (program) has e.g. 2 or 3GB. All this works regardless of amount of RAM available 0.5 or 512GB.
Perhaps this link provides some useful info/background.

Greater than is giving me equal to's

So I'm writing a procedure in PL/SQL that has the logic below:
SELECT
FROM
WHERE
    CASE
        WHEN travel_time IS NULL THEN NULL
        WHEN travel_time = 0       THEN NULL
        ELSE miles/(travel_time/60)
    END >
    CASE
        WHEN (SUBSTR(id, 2, 3) BETWEEN '099' AND '200')
            THEN 60
        ELSE 45
    END;In the result set, I'm getting records where the result of the first and second case statement are both 60.
So basically, if the result of the first case statement is GREATER THAN the result of the second case statement, the record is supposed to show up, but I'm getting records that are GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO. I'm sure I could just change the second case statement to give 61 rather than 60, and I'm sure it would work. But shouldn't this logic work without having to do that?
Thanks!
Edited by: jjmiller on Mar 26, 2010 7:24 AM

As Frank said, a small test case (with CREATE TABLE and INSERTs) would help.
Works for me.
SQL> select * from v$version ;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL> create table travel(id varchar2(3), miles number, travel_time number) ;
Table created.
SQL> insert into travel values (1, 10, 10) ;
1 row created.
SQL> insert into travel values (2, 60, 10) ;
1 row created.
SQL> insert into travel values (3, 46, 10) ;
1 row created.
SQL> insert into travel values (4, 60, null) ;
1 row created.
SQL> commit ;
Commit complete.
SQL> select * from travel ;
ID       MILES TRAVEL_TIME
1         10            10
2         60            10
3         46            10
4         60
SQL> select id, miles, travel_time, case when travel_time is null then null when travel_time = 0 then null else miles/(travel_time/60) end cmp1, case when id between '1' and '4' then 60 else 45 end cmp2 from travel ;
ID       MILES TRAVEL_TIME       CMP1       CMP2
1           10          10         60         60
2           60          10        360         60
3           46          10        276         60
4          600                                60
SQL> select * from travel where case when travel_time is null then null when travel_time = 0 then null else miles/(travel_time/60) end > case when id between '1' and '4' then 60 else 45 end ;
ID       MILES TRAVEL_TIME
2           60          10
3           46          10

Greater Than Less Than

Dear all,
I am Using oracle 10g R2 database on windows.
I have a doubt that,
If I have a 'Date' datatype column suppose a and want to (select Less than sysdate and greater than Sysdate-31(One Month).
e.i.
select a,b,c from T where a Less Than Sysdate-31(One month.);How can i do this.
Thanks,
Chanchal Wankhade.

Shinegar wrote:
I had not considered the effect on an index with TRUNC. Thank you for pointing that out.
TRUNC doesn't actually remove time as you can see below
SELECT TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MM:SS AM') "Today's Date and Time" from DUAL;
Today's Date and Time
01/19/2012 12:01:00 AMLet's say sysdate = Jan 19, 2012 11:00:00 AM
As shown above, trunc(sysdate) = Jan 19, 2012 12:01:00 AM
So, trunc(sysdate) -1 = Jan 18, 2012 12:01:00 AM
Removing the trunc from column a
select a,b,c
from T
where a between trunc(sysdate)-1 and trunc(sysdate);will also remove all data that is greater than Jan 19, 2012, 12:01:00 AM so you would only see data from one day -- Jan 18th.
Adding the trunc to column a returns all the data from Jan 18th and 19th.
It is my experience that users will ask for a date range, but then will ask for just one day. If Column a is not truncated, then no rows would be returned when between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(sysdate).
Most programmers will not use trunc(sysdate) in the where clause, but would use a variable with value assigned of sysdate or trunc(sysdate) as it provides more flexibility.
If you do not want to use trunc on column a, then the where clause should be BETWEEN trunc(sysdate) - 31 AND sysdate.
Edited by: Shinegar on Jan 19, 2012 12:40 PMThe trunc function does not remove the time portion, but it does set it to midnight. Or at least i would if you used the correct format mask in your TO_CHAR. The mask for minutes is MI not MM.
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM') am_pm,
2 TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS') mil_time
3 from dual;
AM_PM MIL_TIME
01/19/2012 12:00:00 AM 01/19/2012 00:00:00John

About JDBC CALL STORE PROCEDURE with out parameter is greater than 4000

Hi Guys,
I have a problem call store procedure with a large string.
as i know varchar2 can contain 32767 characters in pl/sql .
But when i used varchar2 as a out parameter in a store procedure, if the out parameter is greater than 4000 characters , it always give me error message as 'the buffer is too small'.
why it happened?
I read some article that says i need configure a property in data-source.xml , and jdbc 10g driver already solved this problem, but i used jdev 10.1.3.2 ,the driver should be fine.
How can i solve this problem?
Thanks in advance,
AppCat

Object is Foundation, Execute Script
This is for a query, you can change to a stored procedure call. Pull the value back in the Java code then put into the process variable.
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import java.sql.*;
PreparedStatement stmt = null;
Connection conn = null;
ResultSet rs = null;
try {
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
DataSource ds = (DataSource) ctx.lookup("java:IDP_DS");
conn = ds.getConnection();
stmt = conn.prepareStatement("select FUBAR from TB_PT_FUBAR where PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID=?");
stmt.setLong(1, patExecContext.getProcessDataLongValue("/process_data/@inputID"));
rs = stmt.executeQuery();
rs.next();
patExecContext.setProcessDataStringValue("/process_data/outData", rs.getString(1));
} finally {
try {
rs.close();
} catch (Exception rse) {}
try {
stmt.close();
} catch (Exception sse) {}
try {
conn.close();
} catch (Exception cse) {}

Will elements 9 recognize more than 4gb ram?

why does elements 9 only show 4gb ram when my system (window 7 professional) has 12 gb & how do I get it to recognized it?
Elements Organizer 9.0.3.0
Core Version: 9.0.3 (20110328.m.11320)
Language Version: 9.0 (20100905.m.9093)
Current Catalog:
Catalog Name: My Catalog
Catalog Location: C:\ProgramData\Adobe\Elements Organizer\Catalogs\My Catalog\
Catalog Size: 73.3MB
Catalog Cache Size: 627.1MB
System:
Operating System Name: 2000
Operating System Version: 6.1 Service Pack 1
System Architecture: Intel CPU Family:6 Model:14 Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP
Built-in Memory: 4GB
Free Memory: 4GB
Important Drivers / Plug-ins / Libraries:
Microsoft DirectX Version: 9.0
Apple QuickTime Version: Not installed
Adobe Reader Version: 9.4
Adobe Acrobat Version: Not installed
CD and DVD drives:
D: (ASUS DRW-24B1ST BUS: 1 ID: 1 Firmware: 1.01)

To follow up on 99jon's post, 2 to the 32nd power is 4.3Gb. Therefore, PSE will not be able to see more than 4Gb. Win7 will do a great job of managing the installed memory, so there's nothing for you to do but relax and run your applications.
Ken
Message was edited by: photodrawken to correct typo.

Create tablespace whose name length is greater than 50 ?

Can i create tablespace in oracle 10g whose name length is greater than 50 characters ?

Name tablespaces descriptively using a maximum of eight characters. Although Oracle Database tablespace names can be 30 characters long, portable UNIX filenames are restricted to 14 characters. The recommended standard for a datafile basename is tn.dbf, where t is a descriptive tablespace name and n is a two-digit string. Because the extension and the two-digit string take six characters, only eight characters remain for the tablespace name.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B10811_05/app_ofa.htm

Greater than 4GB on 10G R2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for