GRIR acoount split by profit center
Hi,
PO created for two line item. One is for plant A and other is for plant B. GRN raised for the delivery of both items. one FI document created for the GRN, Now the problem is GRIR account has been splited but assigned to one profit center only which has been maintianed in 3KEI.
3KEI maintied for GRIR, Inventory GL account, Field status variant changed and profit center is a required entry.
Thanks
Dinabandhu
Profit centers in GR/IR are derived from Material. No need to assign default profit center in 3EK1.
Similar Messages
-
Document split by profit center
Hi,
We are in a re-implementation scenario.Client is using the older version of SAP and the new version is ECC 6.0.The requirement is to activate the document splitting with profit center and segment as scenarios.(Charecteristics for splitting).As on the cutoff date we take the balances and upload the same in the ECC 6.0 system.The question is how these balances will split.How the customer and vendor line items will split.
Please clarify...let me know if you need further info.
ThanksHello Aravind
Pls check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/EN/87/3da04028f40160e10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Maybe of some help.
Reg
suresh -
Segment reporting, split by profit center; still need segment splitting?
HI experts,
With reference to the subject of this post, I would like to have better understanding on the followings:
Settings (1) IMG > Financial Accounting (New) > Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Ledgers > Ledger > Assign Scenarios and Customer Fields to Ledgers ... I have settings of <Profit Center Update and Cost Center Update>
VERSUS
Settings (2) IMG > Financial Accounting (New) > General Ledger Accounting (New) > Business Transactions > Document Splitting > Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting ... I have profit center to be split (updated)
My concern, is I want to have segmental reporting. In the SAP material, it says that segment derived from Profit Center.
My Question: With the above settings (1) and (2), do I still need to have additional settings for segment? For example:
Settings (2), do I need to set segment here?
How about settings (1), any need to have <segment update>?
In settings (2), help file says: "This determines what fields in a ledger are updated when it receives posting from other application components." Not quite sure what this statement mean.
Thanks and regards,
sbmelHello,
The actual need of scenarios to be added in every ledger is the need for these objects to be updated in new tables like FAGLFLEXT. If you do not add scenarios then information of cost center, profit center , segment will not be updated in New GL Tables.
Hence it is mandatory to pass entire information related to Cost Centers, Profit Centers and Segment by adding relevant scenarios to all the ledgers activated.
Secondly, segment is such a field that can not only be derived from profit center but also through a BADI using a logic written using ABAP code.
Regards,
Sam -
3.Tax Report - Splitted by Profit Center
Hi Colleagues,
My customer has following problem.
They have a vendor and customer invoice posted to more profit centers, but in the tax report the firts Profit centers wehre the document is posted is only visable?
Do they need to activate a New GL (document splitt) in order to get a tax reports splitted by Profit centers.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Slavisa LecicHi Ashish,
If you have hierarchy node like "ALL" which have all the base members of Account and there is no data for other combination.
Ex - Combination of Profit Center A with Accounts 100001 - 100010, 420000, 430000 etc.
Combination of Profit Center B with Accounts 100001 - 100010, 520000, 530000 etc.
In this case if there is no data for combination of Profit Center A and Account 520000, 530000 etc.
and Profit Center B and Account 420000, 430000
then you can use hierarchy node.
Regards,
Shrikant -
Excise amt split on profit center basis
Hi SAP Gurus,
I have the following billing line item for revenue
sale of goods
Conversion charges
Fixing charges
TOTAL
Excise
Here all three revenue items go to a different profit center. The excise is calcultaed on the total of the three revenue. Client want the excise amount should be split in proportion of the revenu item.
How I can address this issue.
CHEERSHi
The same can be done.. Follow the path :
IMG> Financial Accounting(New)>General Ledger Accounting>Business Transactions>Document Splitting>Extended Document Splitting
Here check if Taxes on Sales/Purchase is allowed for customer invoice
But pls check with accounts if they are OK with the entries
Regards
Sanil Bhandari -
Goods movement in a retail using document splitting by profit center
Hello Gurus,
I am in a retail implementation, our requirement is to make a goods moviment from one store to another (where stores are profit centers). But they want to have zero balance document spliting by profit center. (balances by store)
Does any one know how could the document finally be posted if the original movement is:
1000 goods 40 profit center 1
1000 goods 40 profit center 2
Thanks in advance,
answer will be rewarded!
AlexHello Aravind
Pls check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/EN/87/3da04028f40160e10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Maybe of some help.
Reg
suresh -
Cost component split transfer for Profit center valuation in ke27
Dear All,
We have activated multiple valuation/transfer prices. Material ledger is also activated.
We want to transfer cost component split to CO-PA by ke27.
We have defined separate costing keys for access to actual cost estimate for legal and profit center valuations.
But cost component split transfer to COPA works only for legal valution. Even we have defined type of valution for profit center costing key -transfer cost component split and total costs.
What should be else customized to transfer cost components splitting in profit center valuation to CO-PA from actual cost estimates?
With best regards,
Kamila.Hi,
I have assigned the same value fields used for legal valuation to column 2, which was pointed in message.
But now I got following message in ke27:
For actual data, value fields that were already populated before CO-PA valuation cannot be changed in valuation.
1. As a rule, value fields that were filled before CO-PA valuation - be it from SD or by a manual entry of a line item - can only be changed by means of user exits.
(Note that for plan data, CO-PA valuation always has priority over the values planned manually.)
2. The valuation steps in a CO-PA valuation strategy are numbered sequentially. These numbers determine the order in which the steps are carried out within that strategy. As a rule, value fields populated in one step can be used as a basis for calculating values for other value fields in a subsequent step.
Value fields that were populated in a previous step are generally not overwritten by subsequent steps.
The exception to this are steps that use a CO-PA user exit. User exits let you change individual value fields.
3. If you valuate using multiple material cost estimates simultaneously, this means that the values of different cost components within the same cost estimate are aggregated and then entered in one CO-PA value field. However, value fields that already contain data from a previous cost estimate are not overwritten by a later cost estimate. Consequently, you should assign value fields in Customizing so that the values of different cost estimates are entered in different sets of value fields.
4. When condition values are transferred to CO-PA value fields, note that condition types that are assigned to the same value field are added together. This is also the case when the condition types come from different costing sheets within the valuation strategy.
So does it mean we should define separate value fields for PC valuation?
With best regards,
Kamila. -
DOC Splitting in New GL and Profit center accounting activation
Dear All,
I am in a dilemma regarding the following -
We are activating doc splitting with profit center and segment as characteristics.
1) While maintaining Controlling area settings(OKKP) - do we need to activate "Profit Center Accounting" component?
2) Similarly, in IMG-Controlling - Profit Center Accounting- Basic Settings-Controlling Area Settings-Maintain Controlling Area Settings (0ke5), do we need to maintain any settings?
I am of the opinion that ,based on the SAP Note - 826357, that we need not activate PC accounting as it is built into New GL Accounting.
I am also of the opinion, again based on the note, that we can use classic PC accounting, but the note recommends and I quote
we do not recommend you do this on a long-term basis due to the increased data volume and the increased time and effort required, and in the case of active document splitting, the update response changes.
But I am not able to come to a conclusion.
In earlier implementations, I activated PC accounting in OKK5 in New GL doc split scenario. So keeping that in mind, pl guide me.
Thanks & regards,
GovHi
Please set the Profit Center Accounting with Controlling Area.
SPRO->CONTROLLING-->PROFIT CENTER ACCOUNTING -->CONTROLLING AREA SETTING -->MAINTAIN CONTROLLING AREA -
Document splitting with two characteristics Business area & Profit Center
Dear Experts,
is it possible to split the document with two characteristics .
Business area
Profit center
Can anyone suggest!!
Regards,
NaruHi,
Thanks for you immediate response...
i tried with this it is splitting only profit center and not splitting for business area, Please correct if i am wrong.
Amount
Business area
Profit center
Vendor A
4000
Expense
2000
A
A
Expense
2000
B
B
Should split like below
Vendor A
2000
A
A
Expense
2000
A
A
Vendor A
2000
B
B
Expense
2000
B
B -
Profit center reports using document splitting function
Hi
We have activated document splitting with profit center mandatory.
I want to know the standard reports available for profit center
Can anyone help me to know this
Thanks in advance
SnehaHi
Thanks for info
Actually am checking with FSV
But using navigation am checking with profit center
It is not displaying anything
But if i use object list (more than one item) in the report S_PL0_86000028 - Financial Statement: Actual/Actual Comparison, then it is showing profit center field also with each GL account .
Pls guide me
If you do not mind pls send me the screen shots how to view profit center wise postings to simplysneha001 zeemayil
Thanks in advance
Sneha -
Profit center missing from report FAGLL03
We have posted several intercompany documents and when we view the documents using t code FAGLL03, for the automatically generated line items (intercompany accounts) the profit center is blank.
For example we posted
In company A
Dr. expense 1000
Cr. company B -1000
In company B
Dr. company A 1000
Cr. Vendor 1000
For the accounts that are intercompany accounts for company A & B, in FAGLL03, the amounts are showing up as
Dr. 2000 Profit center missing
Cr. 1000 Profit center ABCD
(net is correct as its 1000), but how is SAP coming up with 2000 & 1000 just for FAGLL03? For FBL3n it appears correctly. I know that SAP is splitting by profit center but why is the profit center blank for 2000?
please help& thanks
Briandocument splitting issue
-
Difference in Profit center for GR/IR account in MIGO & MIRO Transaction
1) We have created material 106267 with material type ROH. We have assigned profit center 1001052999 (common profit center) to material.
2) We have created WBS element MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF with profit center 1001052002.
3) We have created PO 4000000236 for account assignment category u2018Qu2019 for the above material with WBS element MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF . After posting GRN for PO 4000000236 we have identified that for GR/IR account profit center is taken from material master & for stock account profit center is taken from WBS element.
Please find the below Flow
In MIGO
Entry
Accounting Document number in Entry View
5000001125
PSKY G/L Code Description
Amount
Curr.
Profit Center
WBS element
89 231101 RAW MATERIAL STOCK 2,000.00 INR 1001052002 MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
96 162101 GR/IR-Material -2,000.00 INR 1001052999 MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
Document number in Ledger View
L.item PK SG Account Description Amount Curr. Tx Profit Ctr WBS element
1 89 231101 RAW MATERIAL STOCK 2,000.00 INR 1001052002 MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
2 96 162101 GR/IR-Material -2,000.00 INR 1001052999 MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
3 50 162001 InterSegment Clrg -2,000.00 INR 1001052002
4 40 162001 InterSegment Clrg 2,000.00 INR 1001052999
It should take profit center from WBS element for GR/IR account & Stock account but for GR/IR account profit center is taking form material master & for stock account profit center is taking from WBS element.
MIRO
Entry
Accounting Document number Entry View
5100000657
PK SG Account Description Amount Curr. Tx Profit Ctr WBS element
31 100000 Ambuja Cement Ltd -1,996.00 INR V4
86 162101 GR/IR-Material 2,000.00 INR V4 1001052002 MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
40 254001 VAT Receivable 80 INR V4
50 172103 TDS PAYABLE -194C -42 INR
50 176101 WCT-TDS payable -42 INR
Document number in Ledger View
PK SG Account Description Amount Curr. Tx Profit Ctr WBS element
31 160100 CRS-Domestic Supp -1,996.00 INR V4 1001052002
86 162101 GR/IR-Material 2,000.00 INR V4 1001052002 MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
40 254001 VAT Receivable 80 INR V4 1001052002
50 172103 TDS PAYABLE -194C -42 INR 1001052002
50 176101 WCT-TDS payable -42 INR 1001052002
In the MIRO Accounting Document profit center for [162101] GR/IR-Material A/C has taken from WBS element
Please note that we are using document splitting with Profit center is mandatory
We have created same scenario for Cost center. After posting the GRN profit center is taken from cost center for both GR/IR account in MIGO & MIRO accounting documents.
Plez helpHello
ANy suggestion for question & if solved do let me know -
Deriving the profit center / segment during Bank Reconciliation
Hi SDN,
One of our requirements is to generate a Financial Statement by Segments.
For this reason, we also need to derive / tag our Bank Reconciliation documents (Manual and Electronic) to the corresponding profit centers or segments. The problem though is that during FF67 or FF_5, there's no way we can enter these data.
At the same time, we can't set a default profit center via FAGL3KEH since these bank accounts may be used for multiple profit centers and not defaulted to one only.
My question now is, can we use the document splitting functionality so that we can "inherit" the profit center / segment from the payment document during bank recon?
To give you an idea here's a sample flow of what we wanted.
Customer Invoice (GL view) - OK in the system
Dr Accounts Receivable (profit center 1) *inherited
Cr Revenue Account (profit center 1)
Incoming Payment (GL view) - OK in the system
Dr Incoming Clearing (profit center 1)
Cr Accounts Receivable (profit center 1)
Bank Reconciliation
Dr Main Bank (profit center 1)
Cr Incoming Clearing (profit center 1)
Currently, system does not inherit the bank reconciliation document to the right profit center. Is there any way we can do this in the system?
ThanksDear,
During bank Reco system inherit the Profit Center from the document which it is clearing. There is no need to maintain Default the same in FAGL3KEH.
Please activate splitting at Profit Center level.
Hope this helps!!
Br,Vivek -
Profit center clearing accounts line item display
Dear all,
I have implemented document splitting at profit center level.
The zero balance clearing account (profit center clearing account) is open item managed and also line item display tick is put. eg both ticks are active.
I am trying to see the line items in the account using fbl3n,fs10n etc but am not able to view the line items althought the balance of the account is visible in fs10n.
the message i get is 'no line item selected'.
Pl suggest some way through which i can see the line items of the profit center clearing account.
Regards,
RishikeshDear Venkatesh
I am also facing same problem, I am using T Code FAGLL03 to display Line Items for Zero Balance Clearing A/c but I am not getting line item display instead it is giving following error.
=========================================================================
Account 141010, company code VALC is clearing account
Message no. MSITEM111
Diagnosis
You have stored account 141010 in company code VALC as a clearing account. At the same time, you use line item management with this account.
System Response
Error message issued because line item display cannot read data for an account in a ledger if line items exist partially in the entry view together with clearing items for which there are no line items. In such cases, only the data with line items would be selected.
Procedure
Check the Customizing settings or account control. Change the settings so that only automatic postings without line items can be made to the account, or select a different account as the clearing account.
=========================================================================
Please do suggest me.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Ratnakar -
Profit-center determination of bank subaccounts and bank accounts ; with new GL.
The question here-under has been asked a number of times on forums, though never answered really to my knowledge. Let me try to get it formulated once more :
- When a customer invoice is posted, the receivable is properly split per profit-center thanks to the active splitting solution.
- When the customer invoice is paid through a bank transfer, the following happens generally :
The bank statement posts a first area 'debit' bank and 'credit' bank sub-account on a default profit-center (this posting needs to happen first because SAP aims to have the 'bank' posted as quickly as possible 'in the morning' leaving the manual clearing activities 'in the afternoon').
The bank statement posts a second area 'debit' bank sub-account and 'credit' + 'clearing' receivable. There, the combination of passive splitting and inheritence makes sure that the profit center of the invoice receivable line items is also used for this entire posting.
- Manually or through automatic clearing, the bank sub-account gets cleared. Since the 2 sides have different profit-centers, the systems posts adjustment lines to the zero balance clearing account.
My question : for companies that want to achieve an entire balance sheet per profit-center, it is a problem that the bank account debit and bank sub-account credit are still with a default profit-center. I understand that the splitting solution in new GL does not offer a way to solve that. One needs to adjust the profit-center on the bank account and bank-subacccount with an allocation cycle in EC-PCA. Is my understanding correct or is there a better solution available in New GL ?
Thanks for your replies.
José BegheinHello Ronghua,
Many thanks for your reply. This note is extremely interesting and gives a lot of technical information on the differences between classic PCA and new GL PCA.
I nevertheless did not find clearly what is considered the best practice towards splitting bank account positions.
Kind regards.
José Beghein
Maybe you are looking for
-
Streaming from Time Machine to Apple TV
Hi Chaps, I am in a quandary, I have saved all my movies on to my time machine and currently streaming my movies to my Imac then using an HDMI cable to watch the films on my main Tv. I am thinking of buying an apple TV and want to know if I can strea
-
4S cant back up due to overcapacity - need to transfer info to iPhone 6
I have 13 Gb of photos on 4S. It says it is overcapacity by 173Mb. I have tried always of deleting on both iTunes and on the device directly but it just freezes. I have downloaded all photos to PC but it won't allow me to delete them from iPhone. I h
-
Terminal commands not working.
Hey all, well it seems I've really messed it up. I've ventured into my first experience with database application programming using mySQL and have royally screwed up my Terminal. When I start up Terminal, the second line says: -bash: ps: command not
-
SQL allows you to add comments on TABLES, VIEWS and SNAPSHOTS plus columns thereof. If you fill in the Comment property for those definitions the DDL generator will produce the appropriate DDL. However, Designer also has Comment property for things l
-
Firefox would not allow me to communicate with Garmin, when I tried to load Garmin Communicator, I got a message saying that Firefox 5.0 was not compatible with Garmin Communicator.w