Group share calculation

Hello,
A owns B by 80%, B owns C by 70%, C owns A by 10% and B by 5%
What is the algorithm the system uses to compute group share for B, C?
Does it use multiple iterations and does it solve the system of equations for this?
Is this algorithm documented somewhere? (exept for simple example in the hepl)
Thanks

Hi Alexey,
No doucments on this available in SAP. However, you can test if system resolves such complication thru equation.
Best Regards,
UR

Similar Messages

Differences between consolidation with Direct share and Group share?

Dear all,
I am new in consolidation of investments.
Example illustrated from SAP help directory showed that the amount of goodwill arises from acquisition with direct shares will be more, Why?
In what circumstances acquisitions with direct share is used instead of Group share?
Thanks.
Regards,
Renee

Direct shares and Group shares:
The group share and minority share of investments and equity in acquisitions of an investee unit are evaluated on the basis of the current percentages of ownership.
· Acquisitions with direct shares (used in U.S. GAAP statements)
· Acquisitions with groups shares (used in German HGB statements).
If acquisitions are calculated on the basis of direct shares, only investment paths between the immediate upper units and the investee unit are taken into account; group shares of the remaining upper units are not taken into account.
The entire ownership grid is taken into account when using acquisitions with group shares. The group share in the investee unit results from taking into account all investment paths that lead from the parent units of the consolidation group to the investee unit.

What are the differences between acquisitions with Group shares and direct

Dear all,
I am new in consolidation of investments.
Example illustrated from SAP help directory showed that the amount of goodwill arises from acquisition with direct shares will be more, Why?
In what circumstances acquisitions with direct share is used instead of Group share?
Thanks.
Regards,
Renee

Hi Renee,
What seems to me is its due the treatment as per different GAAPs. Some of the GAAP require direct share and others group share for calculation og GW. If you only consider the direct share then the GW is calculated only as per that share. However if you consider the group share then the calculation of GW will be based on the total holding in the group. In the example given probably the immediate parent company is not held 100% withing the group. That means the GW of the subsidiary will be diff based on the fact whether you are looking at direct share (share of imme. parent in the subs) or grp share (share of imme. parent in the subs*share of grp in the parent).
Hope it helps a bit.
Regards

Share calculation Not working in the report

Iam surprised not to ge the simple share calculation not working at my report.
I have a dimension and corresponding values ( measures) .I made a Total at the end of the report. and I want to calcualte share of Total to each corresponding value.
how to do this, any thougts,...
I have used calculated memebers for this, But I wan to make the percentage of the total ( which is calculated inside Tool itself)
Please help....

Prassad,
Not totally sure what you are trying to achieve but there a couple of possible solutions:
1) Total = total of all dimension members. Assuming you only have three dimension members then you should have a fourth member called ALL_DIMS or something similar. In the Share calculation template you need to specify the Total level as the basis for your share calc. This will generate the following result:
                         Revenue % Share
- All Members     600         100%
     A                  100           17%
     B                  200           33%
     C                  300           50%2) The total you are referring to is in fact a sub total and is the result of adding together only the results for A + B + C, i.e. you have hundreds of dimension members but you specifically want to see a total for just these three members. To do this create a new custom aggregate call "My Total" and add together the dimension members A + B + C - Custom Aggs are a new feature to Discoverer OLAP (Checkout Mark Rittman's excellent blog article for more information on this feature: http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/11/13/checking-out-the-new-discoverer-101220-features/)
Then in the Share calculation wizard set the basis for your index using the last option in the list "Specific Dimension Member" and select your new custom aggregate member.
Hope this helps
Keith Laker
Oracle EMEA Consulting
BI Blog: http://oraclebi.blogspot.com/
DM Blog: http://oracledmt.blogspot.com/
BI on Oracle: http://www.oracle.com/bi/
BI on OTN: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/
BI Samples: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/samples/

Limited searching on Group share, can't automount

Hi, OS X Server newbie here, but I'm starting to get a decent feel of how things work.
I have set up OD and the client computers up with mobile accounts that store their home directory locally but still allow authentication. I lumped the appropriate users into a group, say "officegroup", with their own share, /Groups/officegroup.
Now, once clients log in to their workstation, I cannot get the group share to automount. To access it I have to go through Finder, enter the username and password, and it works fine. I thought that upon login, authentication would be good to go to access other services and the user would not have to enter their username and password in again. I've checked DNS (dig, dig -x, -checkhostname, etc.), and everything checks out fine and says that it's all being resolved correctly. So, what am I missing?
Second, it seems that searching is limited in the group share. If I search for something, only folders come up, but no files. Spotlight is enabled on the share, I've rebuilt the indexes with mdutil, but nothing changes. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Nate

I wanted to write what I found out in hopes of helping someone else who uses OS X Server and isn't as experienced as some people who contribute here. When I upgraded to 10.4, I was using Netinfo domain and Open Directory to bind my clients to the server. In WGM I had to authenticate to LDAP, for reasons I still don't completely understand. I wasn't however, correctly using LDAP for authentication across my network.
I used Server Admin to migrate my Netinfo domain to LDAP in Open Directory. Then I turned on DHCP in OS X Server and turned off DHCP on my router. Then I used DIrectory Access to configure LDAP to use DHCP-supplied addresses and added an entry for my server. I disabled Netinfo on each client once I verified that this worked.
Once this was done the automounts showed up in the correct location as specified in WGM. And no, you don't have to create the folders on the client machines. In addition, my authentication for my users has been fixed to use LDAP properly (well, at least as far as I can tell at this point).
All of this info is in the Open Directory and Authentication Manual. The lesson I learned is that the OD stuff has to be properly configured otherwise services that depend on it will not perform quite right. What's scary is that I used this half-baked configuration since I installed Tiger a long time ago. I run a simple server-based enironment in my house, so I never picked up on the inconsistency.

Market Share calculation of many products and markets.

Hi all,
I would really appreciate if you can help me on the below business issue of Market Share Calculation.
Prd_ID = Product ID
PS = Product Sales
M_ID = Market ID
MS = Market Sales
MS% = Market Share

Prd_ID;PS;M_ID;MS;MS%
A00001;10;MRK1;100;10%
A00002;20;MRK1;100;20%
SBTOT;30;MRK1;100;30%
B00001;40;MRK2;200;20%
B00002;30;MRK2;200;15%
SBTOT;70;MRK2;200;35%
GTOTL;100;MRKX;300;33,3%
KFigures are only :
ProductSales (Sum aggregation)
MarketSales ( ?? I tried may exception aggrs with no result)
Market Share is a formula in BEX.
I need an aggregation on unique only records in terms of the Market_ID. If Market_ID appears more than once, should be ignored (even the Market Id is drilldown or not)
I saw in the documentations example of MS% calculation, but this is working only if we analyze the products agains one Market_ID.
But a company may compete in many markets with many products.
Thanks
Vasso Siagri

Hi TW Typewriter,
Yes, I am changing the date in the "schedule lines" tab for the sales order to a date next week, say May 23, 2014. When I click on the display "Shipping" info, I see:
1) Delivery date: 05/23/2014 - 00:00
2) GI Date: 05/22/2014 - 22:00:00
The expectation is to have the GI date 23:00:00 since my config for the route on the sales order is for 1 hr of transit time only.
See attached

Can 2 cost center group share same cost center?

Dear Experts,
Can 2 cost center group share the same cost center?
Basically I'm looking at MATRIX structure where one cost center, say an Equipment shared by 2 different cost center groups (say one in "Location-A" cost center group, and the other one is in "Process-A" cost center group). This is to enable the management to be able to see the costs incurred in either by "Location" cost center group or "Process" cost center group.
The "Location-A" cost center group may tied to Cost center 101, Cost Center 102 and Cost Center 103. The "Process-A" cost center group may only tied to Cost Center 101, and other cost center 201 (which is also tied to other "Location-B" cost center group).
Please advise.
regards,
Abraham

Hi Abraham,
its not possible to assign a cost center to several cost center groups in the standard hierarchy. Otherwise, the standard hierarchy would be inconsistent.
As stated in the online documentation under http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/25/908fc66d8411d194f000a0c93031df/frameset.htm
'You can assign each cost center to only one group in the standard hierarchy, but to as many alternative groups as you require.!
Regards,
Greta

How to follow up on promotion result article/article group share of paper

Hi
How do we collect data and analyse benefit of specific articlegroups share of promotionpapers.
further more we would like to have the data available and tools to analyze prior performance depending on the article group size and placement in paper.
I can't find standard field in SAP but I have this naive beliefs that SAP made this posible in there retail solution....
does anyone know how to do this..
keel

On my OJ Pro 8600, When I go to print a # 10 envelope, it feeds the envelope through and then prints the address on a letter page. I was forced to set the printer preferences to #10 envelope, and within Word, set the paper type to # 10 envelope, set Word up for center feed, and then put everything back to print normally. ON my 6500 all I had to do was hit print. There must be a way to print single envelopes without jumping through all these hoops!!

Group By Calculated Columns Issue

Dear All,
I have some lists and libraries which has some calculated columns for calculating year and month based on created date and we have custom views which has group by on those calculated columns. The problem is group by is not working as expected. Attached are
the screens for reference. We have also applied the June CU still no luck.
Please help us on the resolution to the same.
Rajani.J

Make sure you dont have space in the data by any chance. You can try recreating the view again.
Mark ANSWER if this reply resolves your query, If helpful then VOTE HELPFUL
INSQLSERVER.COM
Mohammad Nizamuddin

Group share - saved Interactive Reports

Hi,
My customer would like to share their personal "Saved Interactive Reports" with other users.
We have a work around by creating a "Group User ID", login as this ID and create, use, share these reports.
My customer doesn't like logging in/out all the time..
Thank you, BC

check this Re: User saved IR

Group by calculated column?

How can one group by a colum that is derived? E.g.
select
a.col1,
a.col2,
(select count(*) from table_b b where b.ix=a.ix) as foo,
count(*)
from
table_a a
group by ??????
Unlike "order by" I cannot simply "group by 1,2,3", and calling out the volumn alias "foo" doesn't work either.

SELECT   a.col1
,        a.col2
,        SUM(DECODE(b.ROWID,NULL,0,1)) foo
,        COUNT(*)
FROM     table_a       a
,        table_b       b
WHERE    a.ix = b.ix (+)
GROUP BY a.col1
,        a.col2
/

Group by calculation

select
802 as acct1, 803 as acct2,100 as amt1 ,-100 as amt2
into #Acct
Insert INTO #Acct
select 802,803,100,-100
UNION ALL
select 803,802,-100,100
UNION ALL
select 803,802,-100,100
UNION ALL
Select 803,802,-100,100
Hi,
I inserted the sample data as sql,
I have acct1 and acct2 with amounts, I need output like this
Acct1   Amount
802     500 (from both amount fields)
803     -500(from both amount fields)
i can do this by using self join , but this table has million records, please give me a better solution

if have mutiple column associated to the accounts and needs to calculate the same way
You can extend the same solution for multiple columns
ie like
SELECT amt,
SUM(field1) AS field1,
SUM(field2) AS field2,
SUM(field3) AS field3,
FROM Tablename t
CROSS APPLY (VALUES (amt1,field11,field21,field31,..),
(amt2,field12,field22,field32,..),
)tmp(amt,field1,field2,field3,..)
GROUP BY amt
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My Wiki User Page
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page

Bug/incompatibility? SnowLeopard server problem automounting group share point on Lion clients

I've been using Wazza's Server Notes for Snow Leopard server, with great success. But now I've run into something that I don't think is user error.
Here's the rundown: school network, mix of PPC Leopard, Intel Snow Leopard, and Lion clients running off a Snow Leopard server. Clients are bound with server. Things that work great: account access, managed preferences, file sharing, mobile accounts, even network image deployment.
Now the latest obstacle: only on Lion clients, the Group Sharepoint will not automount. I know it's not mounting (as opposed to merely not being seen). Finder is configured correctly. I know it's not a conflict of managed preferences--I isolated this one managed preference from the others to make sure of that. And moreover, the Group Sharepoint appears fine, using any user account on any Snow Leopard client. Only the Lion clients don't cooperate.
I have heard rumors that Lion is still a little bit buggy. Is that the culprit? Or is it rather that Apple wants me to upgrade my server to Lion if I have Lion clients?
Regardless, is there a workaround?
Thanks for any input. The help and education I get here is amazing,

Well, no, now I've eliminated that line of reasoning. I had no problem getting the User Home Sharepoint automounted, via computer-group managed preference. Which means that in principle there shouldn't be problems automounting in a lion client.
What I am noticing is that, in general, the lion client is having plenty of success handling managed preferences of computer groups in WGM, but not User groups. For example, the lion client stops loading one of my startup apps if I use user-group preferences to set it.
Problem is, the group Sharepoint can only be ticked on within the users and user groups preferences. Too bad it doesn't do anything,

Managing users, groups and shares with Mavervicks server

I recently upgraded from Snow Leopard Server to Mavericks.
In Snow Leopard, WorkGroup manager was the primary way to create shares, users and groups. Now it would seem that it is optional and in fact, I do not even see how to create a share in WorkGroup except for perhaps a group share which I'm not quite sure how to do.
For my setup, I have setup Open Directory and create a few Local Network users. DHCP is managed via my airport and the DNS is on but only for server and points to my Airport IP address.
QUESTIONS:
Should I be managing users with WorkGroup manager or server app, Whats the advantage?
I don't have user profiles (files) stored on the server they are local. That being the case, why does each user have a network folder on the server?
Thanks!

Workgroup Manager and MCX are deprecated. These technologies should only be used if you can not accomplish your tasks with Server.app and Profile Manager. If you have specific requirements that can not be satisfied in Server.app and Profile Manager you should send feedback to Apple.
So to your questions:
Should I be managing users with WorkGroup manager or server app, Whats the advantage?
I don't have user profiles (files) stored on the server they are local. That being the case, why does each user have a network folder on the server?
1: Ideally, no. Unless... You are supporting machines prior to 10.8.5 or can not find an equivalent function in Server.app and Profile Manager. There is no advantage to using it. Apple will eventually stop distributing it. It is available now for legacy support only. If you have a need for MCX management then WGM remains viable. But, ideally, you should be looking to Profile Manager.
2: This is because you created your accounts using Local Home Folder template instead of None - Services Only. The Local Home Folder template has the unfortunate side-effect of creating a user home folder on the server. I too dislike this. If you only want to use the accounts for services, then you should create the accounts using None - Services Only. By the way, it is safe to delete these home folders if you would like.
Reid
Apple Consultants Network
Apple Professional Services
Author "Mavericks Server – Foundation Services" :: Exclusively available in Apple's iBooks Store

Grouping By a Calculated Column Issue

Hi,
I have 2 issues when I try to group by a view using a calculated column:
It will show the number of items under each group but you expand is not showing any items at all
It will show the item reproduced 333 times.
The first one it happens to all the lists and libraries on SharePoint 2013. However the second issue happened only in a document library that holds the employee Documents. The view is grouped by Document type column and the Employee column ( which is the
calculated column). It shows multiple versions of the same document as stated above.
Any help is very much appreciated.
Thanks

Hi,
According to your description, there is an issue when grouping by Calculated column.
It was a known issue in the early build version of SharePoint 2013, it is already fixed in the August 2013 CU:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/steve_chen/archive/2013/03/26/3561010.aspx
I suggest you install August 2013 CU or the later versions and then create new list for a test.
Best regards
Patrick Liang
TechNet Community Support

Group share calculation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for