Group usage of Plus service

Trying to convince my club to invest in plus service. They require group access...many people accessing and turnover every few years. Anything special to consider? Is the email tha purchased Plus able to set others to author..or co-author...sorry if this is basic. I want to alleviate any concerns they have.

You can share a form with others. This FAQ explains how it works:
http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-2462
I think this will meet your needs (without any extra cost). Each person creating forms needs a Plus account. You can share the form you created with others and they only need free accounts to access it.
Randy

Similar Messages

10G installation - isql*plus service in 'starting' status after instalation

I am installing Oracle 10G rel. 10.2.0.1.0 in a fresh formatted system on win 2003 enterp. edition. SP1.
In the installtion at 99% stage after setup is done it throws pop-up that : "isqlplusscv : failed to start the service, Error , the operation completed successfully".
Installation seems to have finished successfully but,I see in services.msc that isqlplus* service is in "starting" mode and i have tried all possible ways to start the service manually, setting ORACLE_HOME, ORACLE_SID env. variables thru cmd and manually also with all sets of permutaions and combinations.But still 'OraclePSI102ISQL*Plus' service is in 'starting' status only.
Even tried uninstalling oracle with all proper registry deletions in a proper procedure and re-installed 10G.Still at the same 99% stage it throws same pop-up, and all the above condition is same.
Could anyone help resolving this?
Edited by: Saandip Bakchu SAP on Apr 19, 2009 10:09 AM

Hi Baran,
We cannot stop the service. We ignored this and continued the installation of Central and Database instance and it was completed
Thanks.

CSS VIP Issues (Source Group with 'add destination service')

I have a pair of Cisco CSS 11503 boxes with a ap-kal-pinglist applied to both virtual routers, as a Critical Service, on the Primary CSS. When a link goes down, the VRRP fails over all traffic to the Secondary, as expected, but there is an issue with two particular VIPs. These VIPs have Source Groups configured, like below:
group WEBSITE_ABC
add destination service XYZ_Server_1
add destination service XYZ_Server_2
vip address 10.10.3.25
active
group WEBSITE_XYZ
add destination service ABC_Server_1
add destination service ABC_Server_2
vip address 10.10.3.24
active
Once a failover occurs, the VIPs are unreachable via a browser. I have also seen 1 VIP OK and 1 VIP not, but never both working. At times, when I failback to the Primary, the VIPs are OK again. The services are reachable via a browser during this issue.
any ideas?

You need to check if during the failover the css sends a G-ARP to inform that the arp associated with the nat ip address now belongs to the secondary css.
Get sniffer trace during failver and check if this g-arp is sent.
If not, this is a bug and you need to report it.
If yes, then the problem is not the CSS but another device on the path...did the switch correctly learned the new path ? Does the server have the correct arp table ?
Gilles.

Not able to start isql*plus service

hello,
My problem is that I am not able to start isql*plus service,its continuosly showng "starting.." status but doesnt start.In the event viewer there is an error of isql*plus service which says
The description for Event ID ( 11 ) in Source ( iSQL*Plus Application Server ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: 1056, An instance of the service is already running.
Please help me resolving this problem
The database is Oracle 10g r2 10.2.0.1.0.
Thanx

Ensure that your iSQL service is running..
which OS you use?

Isql*plus service

i delete my isq*plus service manaully on my windows machine with the following command:
D:\>sc delete OracleOraDb10g_home1iSQL*Plus
[SC] DeleteService SUCCESS
how can i recreate this service without reinstalling oracle software

Hi,
Why don't create a service of isqlplus and try to test it, since you have removed or deleted the service registration from the registry but not the software components. There is would not be required to install a isqlplus components once again.
- Pavan Kumar N

ISQL*PLUS service can't start

Hello,
I installed Oracle 10g on Windows XP, SQLPlus is OK, but I can't start iSQL*Plus service. Please help me how to fix this problem.
Thks a lot.
Best regards,
Kim Hung

What error message is returned when You try to start it?
Additionaly You can read Metalink note 400812.1 - How to Create iSQL*Plus Service after Software Only Install on Windows Machine
And Metalink note 334695.1 is usefull as well.

OracleOraDb10g_home1iSQL*Plus service is not starting..

Hi,
I am getting error while starting "OracleOraDb10g_home1iSQL*Plus" service. and my oracle is not stating. When i am trying to connect to oracle it is giving me following error
C:\Documents and Settings\patelpa>sqlplus
Error 6 initializing SQL*Plus
Message file sp1<lang>.msb not found
SP2-0750: You may need to set ORACLE_HOME to your Oracle software directory
I am running Oracle 10g on Windows 2003 SP2 server.
Every thing was working fine i have done of HP Service desk Integration Agent installation on the server and did restart and from then the service is not running.
I have tried "isqlplusctl start" command and it started perfectly fine and i have started database after that and i could connect to database from that session but.. not luck with service.
I have tried to do research on the forums but didn't got answer for the specific scenario i am in.
Thanks,
Pankit.

try unselecting it, save the changes, go back in and select it, save the changes. there is a problem with the path, so that should fix it. either that, or you can fix the PATH environment variable manually, putting all the correct oracle directories at the beginning, in the correct order.

What does the "Internal" value on the ASM Disk Group Usage Chart represent?

In OEM Grid Control, on the Automatic Storage Management Home page there is the Disk Group Usage Chart.
What does the "Internal (GB)" value on this pie chart represent? and how it has been calculated?
On one of our servers it is 13% of available ASM disk capacity.. and on another it is 0%.

Internal space is (Total MB - Free MB) from the @ DiskSpaceUsage - Total MB from the DatabaseDiskSpace usage
It is basically the space occupied by the your DB in the ASM disk space. There are few bugs related to this and need to be refined
regards
Pravin

Dent and Apple Care Plus service

My Iphone 5s have a little dent on the backside. can i repair the iphone5s with the apple care plus service?

Probably not see exclusions for Applecare+
6. cosmetic damage to the Covered Equipment which does not affect the functionality of the Covered Equipment, including, but not limited to, hairline cracks, scratches, dents, broken plastic on ports and discolouration

Roles, Groups and Class of Service

Hi,
I am new to LDAP, have a good RDBMs background. I have read the Sun documentation to understand the concepts. Can someone recommend a good source that provide examples on how to set up Roles, Groups and Class of Services.
Thanks,
Bala.

Directory Server documentation set contains the best examples to my knowledge.
You may want to start with the Deployment Guide for introduction to the concepts and Administration Guide for setting them up and examples.
Regards,
Ludovic.

Could not start Oracle102iSQL*Plus service on local computer.

Hi,
After installation of SAP on Oracle 10.0.2.0, iSQL*Plus service was running fine,I installed with USER:= Administrator
however after login with <SID>adm, it stopped working.I have tried to login back from Both the Users and running the service by assigning User name and Password to it.But it gave me the same error.
could not start Oracle102iSQL*Plus service on local computer.
Error 1067:The Process terminated unexpectedly
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Rahul

Hi,
I couldn't find anything in sqlnet.log,However in Event logs i found the following details
Faulting application isqlplussvc.exe, version 1.0.7.0, faulting module isqlplussvc.exe, version 1.0.7.0, fault address 0x000040b4.
The description for Event ID ( 17 ) in Source ( iSQL*Plus Application Server ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: Failed to find ORACLE_HOME
I have also checked the Environment Variables.
Parameter ORACLE_HOME is also set.
I m using Oracle 10.0.2.0
Please advice
Thanks
Rahul

Purge of groups automatically in Shared Services

Hello,
I need to delete around 200 groups from Shared Services and I was just wondering if it would be possible to automate the process?
Any clues please?
Thanks in advance.
KR,
Andy

Hi,
You can use the import/export utility that has a parameter on the import to delete.
Have a look in :- :\Hyperion\common\utilities\CSSImportExportUtility
Unzip the utility, there in a PDF with usage instructions.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Error while adding users to a group created in shared services

Hi All,
I am using EPM 11.1.1.1.0.. When i log into SHared services as admin and create a group i get the following error when i try to add the user members to the group.
"Servlet error: An exception occurred. The current application deployment descriptors do not allow for including it in this response. Please consult the application log for details."
Can somebody please help....
Regards.
Alicia

Hello Ritendra,
i am also facing the same problem. i could not find some solution.
if you got some solutions then please help me.
i have installed oracle 9i as in W2K system.
regards
sudhir

BT Group lack of customer service

I sent the enclosed letter to the chief executive of BT after my recent experience of a fault. I believe that the customer service was appalling, but guess what has happened? the letter was passed to a complaints department and I received a phone call at 2 minutes to eleven on Remembrance Day (!) and when the person called back at my suggestion half an hour later, we had one of those bitterly frustrating conversations where the apology was "I am sorry you feel like that" What I wanted to learn is that somewhere in the system someone is accountable for lash ups like this. is the BT Group so large, so institutionionalised that the individual customer has no genuine come back? Trouble is that there is no alternative to overhead phone lines so BT just sit there in a monopoly position. "Dear Mr. Livingston, I read the Andrew Davidson interview in the Sunday Times (6th November 2011) with growing disbelief. Has the BT Group really no idea how individual customers feel. For an individual customer coming up against the mighty BT Group, there is absolutely no chance whatsoever of customer satisfaction. Take my case: I reported a fault on my telephone line on 31st October and Open Reach are repairing it as I write, eight days later. When I originally reported the fault, I also said that my wife was undergoing chemotherapy and needed to be in daily contact with her chemo nurse and oncologist. I was told we could not be treated as an emergency (the term used was welfare case) because we could divert calls to my mobile. This was irrespective of the fact that I take my mobile with me when I am out on business; consequently, there is no phone at home. On 31st October I received a text saying that the fault would be fixed by 3rd November at 1700. It was not. I was subsequently told by the BT call centre that it was an automatic text that gave a three-day window for the repair, apparently to conform to a BT customer guarantee. On subsequent calls to BT, presumably the same call centre, I was informed: Open Reach were already working on it. It was a difficult repair and would take some time It was an underground repair and therefore was difficult It had nothing to do with BT, as Open Reach was a separate company It was a fault affecting the whole district and would take some time. None of these had any truth whatsoever; as we knew that the 11 houses in our village had working phones and that the fault was in a junction box up a telegraph pole adjoining our house. On 4th November, my wife had an adverse reaction to one of the drugs she was taking but could not do anything about it as I was out of the house with my mobile phone. She was later taken by ambulance to Exeter hospital A&E An Open Reach engineer came on Saturday morning and took 5 minutes to do a temporary fix to get us through until today. When I asked him why it could not have been done on 31st October or 1st November? He said that “he was just the engineer” and that that BT was a separate company and none of their excuses had any truth. I think that what is most frustrating is that we were brazenly lied to, and we have no redress, save making the treatment we have received public. It appears that there is nobody that is accountable, nobody to take responsibility. We cannot ‘vote with our feet’ and change supplier because BT is in a monopoly position with regard to the provision of the hardware certainly in country areas like mine. Finally, it is galling that I pay line rental and option 1 tariff in advance for such an appalling service and will no doubt have to fight with every sinew to get compensation. I wait with interest to see how the buck is passed on this one, and whether you even receive this letter or it is directed back to customer services where I started originally. Yours Faithfully,"

Good Morning Frankeul,
Sad to say, there is nothing new under the sun.
I reported my phone as totally dead on 1st November. Nothing happened.
On 8th November, I checked the status on the web page and saw it had been resolved that very day and closed. Needless to say, nothing had been resolved. I called the 151 number and had to suffer a recording of 5 minutes, telling me how to check if my phone really was defective. Particularly galling as I gained my first City & Guilds qualification in "Telecommunications, Radio & Line" in 1966.
Returning the the web site, I discovered a new fault ticket had been opened within the past few minutes. Not by me, it hadn't!
The following day, I managed to contcat a human being on the 151 number and had to listen to a poor bloke who had obviously been told "Tell him this or tell him that". (I actually felt sorry for this man).
He told me the fault was somewhere outside my premises. I knew that.
He then told me the engineer was unable to fix the fault. In that case, I said, he must know where the fault lies; where is it?
He said it may be in the junction box outside my house. Well, in order to confirm that, they would need to come to the house and check the junction box and nobody has been near my house.
Aah, said he, they were unable to contact you. Unable to contact me? How did they try to contact me?
"On your land line"! Do you mean the land line that I have reported as defective?
"Yes!"
Gold medals for stupidity!
He then told me the fault would be fixed by 14th November. And how does that square with the line "We aim to fix it within 3 working days"? More to the point, why was the original fault report closed.
He said this was done automatically after 72 hours. "Stop telling me lies! It was closed 7 days after being reported, not 72 hours. And I know why. Someone had spotted an fault report that had been open too long. "Close it and open a new one, thus restarting the 3 working days clock".
This person's supervisor rang me back shortly after my call and was apologetic and confirmed the fault is outstanding since 1st November and should be fixed as a matter of priority.
That was on Novemeber 9th. Today, the 12th, I noticed the web page shows that BT "Aim to fix it" by 14th November.
This should come as no surprise to me though. When I moved into this house in 1995, I applied for BT service and it didn't work. An engineer came out and told me it was due to faulty wiring in the road. This was a brand new house on a brand new estate. The wiring had been installed only a matter of weeks earlier. Quality control? They couldn't even say it, let alone practise it!
In 2005 or 2006, BT's latest version of internet services was being rolled out across the UK and my area was one of the first to get it. I applied for a broadband service (about 64K, if I remember rightly). The equipment arrived and the bill was debited with the cost and it didn't work. More than one or two telephone calls to a call centre did nothing to help my mood nor to get the issue fixed. Eventually, an engineer came to the house and said the problem was down to faulty wiring. To be fair to him, he was most diligent and even reported back to me that the problem was caused by a well known faulty trunk between the cabinet at the top of my road and the exchange. He tried to find an alternative working pair but was unsucessful. After writing to the chairman of BT, I was contacted by an excellent customer care person who not only apologised but arranged for me to be paid compensation. And I never did get the broadband service.
Having seen this faulty cable being recently replaced by fibre, I thought I would have another try. The online speed test said I could have up to 32Mbs. Good! I then tried to order and kept getting an error message. This was when I discovered the issue I currently have.
Since reporting the fault, I have used the Contact Us pages and emailed BT 4 times. No response!
What really galls me, beyond the appalling treatment of BT's customers is that, many years ago, I was an engineer in a GPO telephone exchange. When a customer called 151 to report a fault, we would be contacted in the exchange and asked to carry out tests there and then, while the customer was talking to 151. We would determine if the fault was in the exchange or outside. If outside, the appropriate technician would be notified and a visit would be arranged and the fault fixed in quick time. If the fault was within the exchange, we would fix it virtually immediately.
Also, in my past career, I was responsible for a team of engineers who were providing engineering support to BT as one of our customers. Despite the fact we were rolling out a brand new technology at the time (Tetra radio systems), BT were very hard task masters and demanded immediate responses to any faults that cropped up and I was summoned to meet with them at Rugby on more than one occasion to explain matters to them.
It is a pity BT couldn't have learned some lessons from the manner in which we treated them as customers or maybe from the way GPO Telephones used to handle problems.
Needless to say, I shall be writing once again to BT and I shall resurrect my previous issues with BT on my own web pages for the world to read.

Problems starting iSQL PLUS service on Windows XP

Dear Forum,
I installed oracle 10g for the first time on Win XP. The Installtion-Process was fine. Now I'm not able to iSQL Plus, beacause the iSQL service in the administration area does not start properly. The status always says that it is starting unfortunately with no success.
Need help!
Thanks in advance
sportmeier

hi
i was wondering if and how you solved this error
i have the same problem now
thanks

Group usage of Plus service

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for