HFM Equity Accounting Rules - Time dependant

Has anyone needed to amend HFM Rules for Equity Accounting, we are in the process of doing so, we a new app in which we will be Equity Accounting from Proportional. Elim Rule for JV's are time dependant to run after 2014. However after we have included the Sub Eliminate section for the new rule it does not run after 2014. I attach the section of the rule below: Any help would be grateful.
Sub EliminateNew_EQ(sAccount, sICP, sCustom3)
If POV_YEAR > "2014" Then
' Rules have been chanegd for Equity Accounting from 2014 onwards - plug accounts no longer populated and JV accounts now holding 100% of balances.
sParent = HS.Parent.Member()
sPlugAcct = HS.Account.PlugAcct(sAccount)
IsEliminated = False
'Checks if eliminations should be performed
'If ICP member is not [ICP None]
If (StrComp(sICP, "[ICP None]", vbTextCompare) <> 0) Then
'If account is an ICP account
If HS.Account.IsICP(sAccount) Then
   'If the account has a plug account
   If sPlugAcct <> "" Then
    'If the ICP partner is a descendant of the current parent (we've reached the first common parent)
    If HS.Parent.IsDescendant(sParent, sICP) Then
     IsEliminated = True
    End If
   End If
End If
End If
'Performs eliminations if required
If IsEliminated Then
PConEntity = HS.Node.PCon("")
' Rules have been chanegd for Equity Accounting from 2014 onwards - plug accounts no longer populated and JV accounts now holding 100% of balances.
'If one of these accounts
Select Case sAccount
Case "310401", "416701", "323301", "130101", "237011", "237021", "237001", "237043", "237045", "C100241", "C100225", "C100227"
         'Eliminate input account balance on C3#Input, C3#JV or C3#Sub members
   Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination]", PConEntity * -1, "")
   'If entity is a sub and ICP is JV
   If sCustom3 = "Sub" And Trim(HS.Entity.UD1(sICP)) = "JV" Then
    sParentICP = GetICPParent(sParent,sICP)
    PConICP = HS.Node.PCon("E#" & sParentICP & "." & sICP)
    If sAccount = "310401" Then
     'Post 1-PConICP normally(50%) to JV account and ConICP (normally 50%) to inter company plug account
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#301102_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "416701" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#416002_JV.C3#Input",1,"")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "323301" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#323002_JV.C3#Input",1,"")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    'See subroutine description for details
    ElseIf sAccount = "130101" Then
     dData = HS.GetCell("A#130101.I#" & sICP & C1C2C3C4Top)
     If dData < 0 Then
      Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#200202_JV.C1#Less1.C3#Input",1, "")
     Else
      Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#119002_JV.C1#Less1.C3#Input",1, "")
     End If
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "237011" Or sAccount = "237021" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#236005_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "237001" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237001_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "237043" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237044_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "237045" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237046_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "C100241" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100302_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "C100225" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100225_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    ElseIf sAccount = "C100227" Then
     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100227_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
     'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
'Commented out because code never runs DC 17/06/10
'    ElseIf sAccount = "C100311" Then
'     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100315_JV.C3#Input", 1 - PConICP, "")
'     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    End If
   'If entity is a sub and ICP is a sub or entity is a JV
   ElseIf sCustom3 = "Sub" And Trim(HS.Entity.UD1(sICP)) <> "JV" _
   Or sCustom3 = "JV" Then
    'Post 100% of source value to IC plug account
    Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConEntity, "")
   End If
'Case other ICP accounts
Case Else
'Call WriteToFile("Posting to source account")
   Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination]", PConEntity * -1, "")
   Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct, PConEntity, "")
End Select
End If

This has now been resolved after we put the Time dependancy with the Call Routines

Similar Messages

G/L Account Time-dependency features

Hi Experts,
We are facing a major problem regrading to some atributes of GL Accounts in project in an Insurance company.
First of all, we need the account Texts to be time-dependent because they do change throughout time, so the users can keep track of change and display the correct information in reports depending on time of evaluation.
The second point is related to the relationship of G/L account and Alternative account. This kind of thing also changes throughout time and need to be tracked because the Balance Sheet will be generated based on Alternative Chart of Accounts that will be reflected based on GL Accounts postings.
Has anyone ever faced a situation like this? What would be the implications/viability of using ABAP developments to make these things operational?
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Fabio

Hi Fabio,
I believe this is not possible, As GL accounts do not have time -dependent fields.
You may achieve the same with a work-around like this
Create two accounts CLAIMS and REJECTED CLAIMS
If you need the balance in CLAIMS to be shown under REJECTED CLAIMS from 01.09.2009
- make a JV transfer posting from CLAIMS to REJECTED CLAIMS on 01.09.2009 instead of changing the account name,
Now if you execute the Balance Sheet as on 30.08.09 (key date <01.09.09) you
would see the balance under CLAIMS
but if you executed the balance sheet with key date >01.09.09 you would see the balance under REJECTED CLAIMS
Similarly you may create two accounts (B1 and B2) and assign them to two different alternative accounts (A1 and A2 respectively) and make a transfer posting from B1 to B2 when you need to change this relation.
Hope it helps
Regards
Sach!n
Edited by: Sachin Bhutani on Sep 18, 2009 2:36 AM

Loading time-dependent master data using update rules/transformations

Hi
I am trying to load time-dependent master data to an infoobject. It seems that I get an error message on duplicate records if I use a transformation or update rule. Does this only work with direct update ?

In the DTP you have the option to ignore duplicate records....
Just select that and then load data...

Functional Location Field In AS02 (Time dependent)

Hi All,
I need to know if it is possible to add or show functional location in time-dependent tab(tcode AS02), because i found TPLNR(functional location) in table ANLZ. Fyi, ANLZ is the source table of time-dependent tab in tcode AS02.
Really appreciate your help
Thanks

Dear:
First see layout assigned to your class through OAOA and then go to the path SPRO....Financial Accounting...Asset Accounting...Master Data....Screen Layouts...Define screen layout for master data...select layout...logical field group...select time dependent data...field group rules.. There you will find 89 (functional area)... Make its status optional or mandatory whatever you require.
This will show the field in AS01 for data input.
Regards

Asset Master - Business Area field [time dependent tab]

Business Area field is gray with or without value if i create an asset either from scratch or with reference .
I did check with u201CDefine Screen Layout for Asset Master Datau201D. & u201CSpecify Chart-of-Dep.-Dependent Screen Layout/Acct Assignmentu201D
Still not able to change the field of business area in the asset master .
Is there any other config setting needed to be changed , please let me know.
Thanks & regards
suman

Dear,
Suman.
Please follow the path and make the changes :-
SPRO ---> Financial Accounting New ---> Asset Accounting -
> Master Data -
> Screen Layout -
> Define Screen Layout for Master Data.
Select your respective Screen Layout. Go to Time Dependent Tab Double Click on Field Group Rules.
Select MnNo & Sbno. And save. And then run AS02. I hope this solve your issue.
Please revert for further clarification.
Regards,
Pankaj Bhalerao.

Delivery cost in scheduling agreement having time dependent condition

Hi experts,
We have one peculiar requirement.
We have palnt at indonesia. We are doing import there from india.
Our requirement is as follows.
1. We should use scheduling agreement with time dependent conditions. Because we want to track the price changes and sometimes we want to retro pricing effect and revaluate it.
2. We want to add importers vat and import tax.
3. But those tax amount should not get added into inventory
4. During MIRO it should get accounted to vendor.
We could succeed this by removing "Time dependend condition" check in document type config.
But our client is definitely required the point no 1.
But when we activate time dependent condition check, during MIRO those conditions are not appearing. But if you remove that check, it is appearing in MIRO accounting.
Can any one suggest suitable solution?
Or SAP MIRO will not permit this scenario?
regards,
K.Sundaresan.

delivery cost will not work if u remove the tick Time dependend condition for SA
SAP MIRO will not permit this scenario
so u will have to decide what is more important to u and act accordingly
Solution will be u ask client what is mor imp for there company
as SAP will not support MIRO for deliver for time dependent condition
I had a talk with SAP on this and they have told that
SAP will not support MIRO for deliver for time dependent condition
AS in Case of imports in india we need to do MIRO before GR
hope this hel;sp

Restore exchange account with time machine

Hello,
Using Mail under Maverick, when making a rules and apply it, this rules doesn't works like I expect, and suppress about 400 hundred mails in my inbox (account exchange 365).
I go to TimeMachine to restore the Inbox like 30 minutes before. I see all the losted mails, but when I clik on Restore, a message say something like "restoring box Outlook 365"... and nothing... My inbox stay empty !
In fact, if it's not possible to restore an Mail Exchange Account with Time Machine, it should send me an alert, or propose to restore the mails to a temporary local box.
Could you help me ?
Thanks for your attention and Best regards
Laurent

Sorry,
I just found the alert of your reply in the spam folder !
Yes, I have a suggestion. Im not in front of the Mac where I have had the problem, but I remember that at the bottom of the "On my Mac" mail folders, there is a new folder created by Time Machine. In this folder, the restored send and received mailbox !
Hoppe it will help you.
Best regards,
Laurent

Schudling agreement with time dependent excise base value taking wrongly.

Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
I have maintained the delivery schedule on
15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
After item ok.
When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
When I will post the document
The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
regards
jrp

Hi
I was wondering in J1ID there is validity from date only no to date, Pls tell where you have maintained excise base amount based on from to period.
In J1ID if you maintain any new accesable value for the later date it will consider that.
Rgds
Srini

How to Display Time-Dependent Characteristic Data In Query

Hi Experts,
   I have encountered a problem. I want to use Time-Dependent Chart. And want to display different value according characteristc's valid from time. For Example,
The Characteristic 0COSTCENTER has the navigation attribute 0COMPANY, The data as:
0COSTCENTER   Valid from   Valid To       0COMPANY
BW2305              20070101   20070430     A
BW2305              20070501   99991231     B
I want the report can display as :
0COSTCENTER   Valid from   Valid To       0COMPANY AMOUNT
BW2305              20070101   20070430     A                  1000
BW2305              20070501   99991231     B                  2000
But when I set the query's key date 20070420, the report display as:
0COSTCENTER   Valid from   Valid To       0COMPANY AMOUNT
BW2305              20070101   20070430     A                  1000
BW2305              20070501   99991231     A                  2000
when I set the query's key date 20070520, the report display as:
0COSTCENTER   Valid from   Valid To       0COMPANY AMOUNT
BW2305              20070101   20070430     B                 1000
BW2305              20070501   99991231     B                  2000
Can anybody tell me how I can get report expected.
Thanks in advance.
SF

Hi,
1) Add the characterstics 0COSTCENTER ,0DATETO,DATEFROM and 0COMPANY to the cube.
2) And also add these 4 IOs to the Communication structures which has update rules with the concern cube.
3) I hope , you already have 0COSTCENTER in the Commnication structure and mapping for that infoobject at both Update rules and Transfer rules.
4) Leave to the Blank(no mapping) mappings for the IOs 0DATETO,DATEFROM and 0COMPANY in the Transfer rules.But make 1:1 mapping in the Update rules for these 2 infoobjects.
5) Write the below code in the strt routine of the Update rules:
TYPES: BEGIN OF type4.
      include structure like /BI0/QCOSTCENTER.
TYPES END OF type4.
DATA:
ITAB4 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TYPE4
       WITH HEADER LINE
       WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY INITIAL SIZE 0.
SELECT * FROM /BI0/QCOSTCENTER INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS
OF TABLE ITAB4
WHERE OBJVERS = 'A'.
loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
     READ TABLE ITAB4 WITH KEY COSTCENTER = DATA_PACKAGE-MATERIAL
DATETO LE DATA_PACKAGE-PSTNG_DATE
DATEFROM GE DATA_PACKAGE-PSTNG_DATE.
              IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
                DATA_PACKAGE-DATETO = ITAB4-DATETO.
                DATA_PACKAGE-DATEFROM = ITAB4-DATEFROM.
                DATA_PACKAGE-COMP_CODE = ITAB4-COMP_CODE.
              ENDIF.
              Modify DATA_PACKAGE.
endloop.
ABORT = 0.
Here I assumed you have Posting date in the Communication structure and used to map to Fiscalperiod of the cube.
6) Do the Master data upload to Cost center and active the master data of it always before uploading the data to cube.
7) Do the uploading to cube from Sratch.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P
Message was edited by:
        Anil Kumar Sharma

Imposible to set a time dependency at a transformation

Hi!
I'm in trouble with a transformation (BW 7.0). I'm trying to fill a key figure reading master data from a characteristic. The key figure is an atribute of that characteristic, and it's time dependent. But when I define the rule in the transformation I cannot select any time characteristic to set the dependency.
Thanks!
Jose

Jose,
As far as I understand you are trying to use the "Read Master Data" option with Time dependency that was available in the Update Rules.
If that's correct, here are the steps:
Eg: Assume 1. 0REGION is a time dependent attribut of 0CUSTOMER.
2. Data Src fields: KUNNR, DATE
3. Cube: 0CUSTOMER, 0CALDAY, 0REGION
Your transformation should look like:
KUNNR=0CUSTOMER
DATE=0CALDAT
For 0REGION click to create the mapping:
Choose Rule Type = "Read Master Data"
In the "Source fields of Rule":
Add the fields KUNNR & DATE using the "+" button.
In the IO Assignment column, enter 0CUSTOMER & 0CALDAY and hit Enter.
Now in the "Source Info Object" field to the rt of Rule Type, select 0Customer using F4 help. Since it is time dependent on 0CUSTOMER, the clock icon will appear. Click on the clock button and select 0CALDAY from the F4 help.
It should work. Has worked for me (Data src to ICube directly)
For ODS use the export data source.
If it still doesn't work there are 2 more options:
1. Write a small routine/formula to read the values (as Ingrid had suggested). OR
2. Use it as a Nav Attribute (if the Attribute is a Characteristic) or as a Disp Attr (if the Attribute is a Key Fig). Then use the Key date of the query to calculate time dependency.
(By default key date = Syst date; if you need custom date, use variable exit)
That's all I can think of.
Hope it helps.
- Vishno.

Modify code to pull the time dependent master data

I fully under stand the suggestion below for the requirement to add the time dependent attribute comp code
thanks fo rthe help but please tell me if there is a way i can modify the abap code and make the user enter the value for the date on which he want to pull th emaster data for company code or keydate to and from and pull the master data, so how will i proceede should i create the variable on 0doc_date and how to modify the code. please help . i have opened another question with same desc as above to assign points
thanks
soniya
The literal within <..> is supposed to be replaced by the actual field name (as I didn't know the fields). In this case, I am changing your code for costcenter/company-code.
data : wa like /bi0/qcostcenter.
select single * from /bi0/qcostcenter into wa
where costcenter = comm_structure-costcenter
and objvers = 'A'
and datefrom le comm_structure-<keydatefield>
and dateto ge comm_structure-<keydatefield>.
if sy-subrc = 0.
result = wa-comp_code.
endif.
abort = 0.
You can use this code for update rule of company_code. You have to replace '<keydatefield>' with a field name that contains the date on which the company is to be derived. If there is a date in your comm_structure (eg aedat) which you can use, you can specify that field in place of this literal (instead of comm_structure-<keydatefld> use comm_structure-aedat). If you have no such field, and you wish to use current date for getting the company code from time-dependent master data, you can use sy-datum (ie replace comm_strucutre-<keydatefld> with sy-datum).
And it should work.
The 'master data attribute' option is one of the options when you create update rule (one of the radio button options).

That the code is doing anyway.
If your txn data in the cube doesn't have a date, how does it know it is Feb data, or, it is March data?
If it has a date or month field, you should modify and use this code to update the company based on that date instead of system date.
Other than that minor variation, it is already doing what you look for.

Upload facility for smart forms and expense account rules in oracle iprocurement R12.1.3

Hi All,
We are implementing iprocurement for new operating unit.
We have many expense account rules and approximately 450 smart forms to be setup for new OU. But as part of R12, the setups are to be done through HTML pages.
Currently I do not see any option to upload these 2 items, as doing them manually will take lot of manual effort.
Are there any APIs available to load these 2 items? OR any workaround like using dataloader or isetup?
I am sure many clients are using R12 for very long time and not sure if there are any issues raised on this?
Could you please let us know if there are any options avialble to upload them?
Thanks
sreenivas

How to Setup a Valid Vacation Rule for Purchasing Notifications (Doc ID 378023.1)
Goal
What steps are required for proper setup of a Vacation Rule for routing of Purchasing Notifications?
Fix
1. Enter the Notification Summary or Worklist for a user
2. Select the "Vacation Rule" link
3. Select the "Create New Rule" link
4. For Item Type select "All" for all Notifications or select the desired Notification Type from List of Values
5. Select the "Next" link to proceed to the next setup page for the rule
6. Enter both a a valid Start and End Date for the new rule
7. Ensure the "Reassign" radio button is selected
8. Keep "All Employees and Users" in the menu box
9. Select the "Delegate" radio button - Assign/Reassign action is prohibited for Purchasing Notifications
10. Select the Flashlight icon next to the blank menu box for selecting a user
11. A new sub-screen should pop-up to perform the user search
12. For "Search By" select "Username" - (DO NOT search by Name)
13. Perform the needed wildcard (%) search at the top of the page to locate the desired username
14. Click the radio button next to the desired name of the user to have the notifications sent to
15. Press the "Select" button followed by the "Apply" button
16. Continue on with the saving of the Vacation Rule for latter use
Note:
The key to setting-up a valid Vacation Rule is to ensure the rule is tied to a Username rather then the Full Name of the desired user. The reason for this is that the Worklist and Notification Summary for the user is linked to their username and not full name record.
Reference:
Oracle Workflow User's Guide - Release 2.6.3.5
Part Number : B12162-02

Time dependent issues

The R3 side doesn't have the FROMDATE and TODATE to record the changes, but BW has the FROMDATE and TODATE when the attributes are checked as time-dependent.
Do the time-dependent attributes depend on the master data load to record the changes to the FROMDATE and TODATE? How does BW record the changes for the time-dependent attributes?
What happens if the BW database that stores the master data is corrupt; this is assuming that there is no backup?
How would you recover the FROMDATE and TODATE time-dependent attributes? If you were to reload all over again, the history of the changes to the attributes would be the most recent changes. Is this correct?

this is how the BI handles Time dependent MD with 0costcenter
11111- edna - 01/01/1000 - 12/31/9999 - this is the intial masterdata entry created when you are made a mgr for 11111.
Now you are promoted and are allocated to 22222, so the entry in R/3 would be
22222 - edna - 01/01/2007 - 12/31/999. if you still hold both the costcenters the entries will remain same. but if i was allocated to costcenter 11111, then the entry would be
11111- edna - 01/01/1000 - 12/31/2006
11111- voodi - 01/01/1000 - 12/31/9999
Now thats where the key date comes into picture when somebody runs the report for costcenter 11111 in 2005, you will still be shown as the mgr of the CC, depending on the validity period of the CC under ur name. This still highlights the validity period, in plain BI lang FROM/TO dates that have to be populated from the source system that would have been created/changed when a value is entered into the system. I'm not sure or aware of any way, BI can mysteriously know the validity periods with no business logic or rule to fill in the FROM/TO dates int he masterdata.
your reply does not really clarify my thought process.
Not sure If I can ever clarify ur thought process.
When the tough gets going, you would normally point me to a link
I only point to link when people are not clear abt the basic understanding of the issue they want to discuss. FYI - the link doesnt refer to flat file loads (if thats what you could make out from the link).
sure i didnt clarify ur thought process:)

Time dependent Attibute in my Infoobject ?

Hi All,
Scenario :I have one Char Infoobject with time dependent attribute in that . Data is loaded as Direct update with full load
We are this to maintain History
Question :
1.When I go to maintain masterdata I get two attribute add along with my attribute as Valid From and Valid To, is it system genrated ?
2.When I go to transfer rule ,we have maped this two genrated attribute as well - so In our system To date is constant as 31/12/9999 and Valid From is assign to 0calday.
But when I see the data I get the entries for one particular material as multiple - and more ever it automatticaly adjust Valid To date = current calday -1 , the big problem for me I am not able to get How system is doing this adjustment for Valid From and Vaild To dates for previous entries . -
Is this feature of Time depeneded attribute ???
Note : When I see the infopakage I cant find start routine But I can find one date field from source made available only in Selection tab and which is assign to getyesterday (0)
But which is not maped in transfer rule, I was thinking that it might be used to map to Valid to Date through ABAP.. But I am not able to find code for the same ....
Please advice and Give more info on Time Dependend Attibute .?

1.When I go to maintain masterdata I get two attribute add along with my attribute as Valid From and Valid To, is it system genrated ?
Is this referring an additional record generated by system with diff valid to and from dates ?
Yes, system does that for Time dep m data
Ex : Profit Center - 9999 -12/31/2006- 01/01/1000 - > System Generated Record
Profit Center - 9999 -12/31/9999- 01/01/2007 - > One in the source system created by user.
That is how it works.
But what is your concern because of this sys gen records ?
You will only find the user created profit center in the report.

Time-dependency in master-data

Good mornging BW-community
I still have a problem during my query. I have time-dependent master-data (an item infoObject with it's corresponding price as an attribute) and want to show the item prices depending on the date of sale on my bill. I can put a "key-date" in my query-properties, but that delivers only the price to that date. I would like to have the price determined by the date of sale saved in 0CALDAY in my cube. What do I have to enter in the query-properties?

Hello Jochen Schmitz ,
You can write routine in update rule which fetches values from master data info object and collect it into ODS as per bill date.
The code in update rule should like this ..
select price into lv_price from /bic/table "table containting time dependent master data
                    where material = /bic-material
                       and billdate >= datefrom
                       and billdate<= dateto.
Hope that helps.
Regards
Kapadia
Message was edited by:
        Mr Kapadia

HFM Equity Accounting Rules - Time dependant

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for