Hiding fields in standard user management view

Hi all,
How to hide fields in user management views.
Like in the create user view, suppose I want to hide the <b>additional information fieldgroup</b>. how can I do it?
I have the par file and tried to comment the code which is related to the additional information field group. But when we try creating an iview from the new par(modified par-i changed changed the name ) I do not c the portal component called <b>create user</b>. I am a bit confused.
Can anyone help me out regarding this.
thanks,
Paul

Hi Paul
Have a look at
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_webas630/helpdata/en/d1/956f8b86b2a949913ed22d253e0012/content.htm
and http://help.sap.com/saphelp_webas630/helpdata/en/91/646d498fd94142a37e90a3b848e45e/content.htm
By setting the default values you can either have them displayed or hidden.
Hope this helps,
Regards
Uma.

Similar Messages

PCH ldb - hiding fields on standard selection screen

Hi,
I am using PCH ldb in my report. The standard selection screen which appears initially, does not show us the "object selection period" fields directly (it is hidden initially). It is displayed only after the "other period" button is clicked.
The requirement is that the "object selection period" fields should be displayed directly without requiring the user to click on the "other period" button.
When using PNP ldb, it is possible to create a report category and hence this can be achieved in PNP. But i am unable to find any solution for the same in PCH ldb.
Does anyone have some idea about implementing the same.

Hi Vikram,
There are no report categories for PCH.
If you enter some values in the dynpro variables it will jump there automatically.
REPORT zmf_pch.
TABLES: objec.
INITIALIZATION.
pchobeg = sy-datum.
pchoend = sy-datum.
GET objec.
Regards,
Michael

Hiding Fields in Standard Program : RFITEMAR ,LDB : DDF

Hi Experts,
Am using standard program : RFITEMAR ,as per my requirement i dont need
to display all the fields in the standard selection screen,i juss want to hide the fields which
i dont want to dispaly in the selection, as there are some dependencies i dont want keep that code in active state.
can anyone pls help me/suggest me with my logic/guidance would be helpful and very much appreciated.
Regards,
Ashok.

Hi Marcin,
Thnaks for your response.
SHDO Tcode is used for Transcation Varient which is used to hide the fields
or display additioal fields in sales order.
According to my requirement i copied the standard program into a custom program
thats where am tryig to implement changes.am not sure wether that would fulfill my requirement.
do let me if know any solution /guidance would be helpful and appreciated.
Regards,
Ashok.

Hiding fields in standard SAP Transactions

Hi All,
We have a requirement to hide some fields in ME51n, ME21n, ME31k,ME11,MIGO,ML81n,MIRO
I know we have screen layout at doc level through which we can make the fields as optional, display and mandatory.
Please let me know the standard way to hide som of the not required fields in these transactions.
Thanks,
Vijay

Part of answer is in your question
For ME51N,ME21N,ME31K,ME11,MIGO configure document level screen settings
ML81N & MIRO using SHD0 transaction hide required fields.
Refer this article [Creating Transaction and Screen Variants|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/a070bfbb-d34a-2d10-b092-ecbe0b0d4a4c]
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Oct 26, 2010 10:54 PM

Modifying User Management Pages

Hi,
We want to create a simplified user management (removing unused buttons and fields) using the standard User Management Web Dynpros in NWP 04s. Does anyone know if they're available for download somewhere?
Regards
Mattias

Hi Mattias...
See these links... It might be helpful for u..
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/06/05/user-management-api-in-webdynpro
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/ep/user+management&
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ee37934c-0601-0010-e199-ac8e503ad6a9
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f5/4dd9d47a200d46bd1c56062f49e10b/content.htm
URs GS

GRC-AC 5.3 RAR Management view error - Expired users not cleaned-up.

Hello Gurus,
I have a problem in RAR Management View: Users who was valid have been analyzed and their conflicts considered in statistics, but when they become expired, their conflicts remain in the statistics forever, because they are not re-analyzed neither in Full nor in Incremental sync. Even if all roles are removed from the user in backend, the conflicts remain in Management View.
I think the Full Batch Risk Analysis should clean-up all users violations from current period statistics before recording the new analysis results.
Did you have this problem too? Am I missing something?
I appreciate your thoughts about it.
Vaner

Hello Nuno,
Thanks for your comments.
My release is 5.3 SP 16.2.
I also think the full sync should be enough but I already find about 20 users with problems, in 4 different backend and in 2 GRC (Tests and Production)
I think that depending on some procedures done in the back-end the full sync do neither re-analyze the user nor clean-up previuos statistics, for example:
1. A user was delete and recreated again with option to maintain old data, and he already had expiration date.
2. A sand-box environment was created as copy of production, users were created valid but already with expiration date.
I observed that for these scenarios, there was no Change Document for field "valid to", my guess is that Full Sync process relies on Change Documents to do its job.
I already opened a message in SAP for this, first level could not solve it, It is in Development Team now.
Vaner

Additional Field in standard maintenance view

Hi Experts,
I would like to add an additional field plant in maintenance view V_TKZU3_CO (SPRO PATH: Controlling --> Product cost controlling -->Product cost planning --> Basic settings for material costing -->Overhead -->Define costing sheets ).
What I'm planning to do is to modify the standard maintenance view V_TKZU3_CO and regenerate the table maintenance generator so that the new field will be added and populate a ztable a copy of table TKZU3 + plant...
However what I'm afraid of is when I regenerated the table maintenance generator using the standard function group OCOE, it might impact some other standard object included..
Do you have any idea on how can I add the additional field without modifying the standard? Or if I will apply the standard modification I'm planning.. what are the possible impacts?
Thanks in advance!

Hi
U can create a new table view like V_TKZU3_CO, insert your new fields and create the maintenance view program for it.
Max

ERROR VIRSA CC 5.2 - Management View -User Analisys - NOT UPDATED!!!!!

Hi ,
i executed the JOB of SYNK of users, the Job of RISK analysis and the JOB of update of management Report .
When i go in - Management View - User Analisys -( i select date , System , User Group ) Virsa CC shows me the correct number of users actually in the system, for this user group , according to USR02 SAP table , BUT Users with NO Violations and Users With Violations are not correct.
I show results:
No. of Users Analyzed : 25                CORRECT
Users with no Violations : 95 379%     NOT CORRECT
Users with Violations : -70 -279%        NOT CORRECT
The Interactive pie chart shows the correct number of users with violations : 2
Who it' s possible ?
BEST REGARDS
Maurizio

Abdul,
You stated in your initial comment that the Management Report check box was NOT selected? If this is the case then the graphs on the informer tab have not been updated. You must first execute the SOD (user/role/profile) analysis, once that job is complete then execute a separate job for the management reports. This will then update the informer tab (given that your rule set has been updated with your custom functions and risks).

PI standard users password management

Hi Experts,
What is the best practice for password management of PI standard users? Shall all the users be given the same password at the time of installations? What are the implications of changing the passwords at a later stage, specially of the PISUPER user which has to be reflected in the Java stack also.
Thanks & Regards,
Shobhit

Hi,
Its always preferable to follow the same password as below instead of changing it. it may lead to abrrupt behaviour. I am not sure.
Probably below links will help you
The XISUPER user has a pwd of XIPASS.
The following service users are created during the installation, and the passwords are specified at that time. You should check with the basis people.
XIREPUSER - User for the Integration Repository
XIDIRUSER - User for the Integration Directory
XIAPPLUSER - User for sender applications
XIRWBUSER - User for the Runtime Workbench
XILDUSER - User for the System Landscape Directory
XIISUSER - User for the Integration Server
XIAFUSER - User for the Adapter Engine (communication between SLD, Integration Server, and Adapter Framework)
LSADMIN - User for the Change Management Server
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f4/67b340be3dff5fe10000000a155106/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/14a57f2a-0a01-0010-08bb-8cd5bb9079d6
J2EE_ADMIN password change problem
Thanks
Swarup

OIM 11gR2 Change default query on users manager field

Hi, we are trying to change the default behaviour of users manager field.
When a user is creating another user on OIM, he should only be able to select a particular type of users. So we would want to filter manager field based on a particular user role. For example: just show employees.
At this point, we have checked User.xml searching for the associated query, we have tried to edit inputListOfValues for Manager on Create User form,... but still no idea on how this could be done.
Could anyone point us on the rigth direction on how to achieve this?
Thanks in advance!

Karthik Perath
Thanks for the answer....... but I guess you misread the question. I am able to add new fields as columns to the search results table. My problem is I want to add the searchable field to the query form. Also, I do not want to use the Add Fields button (because that is a part of Saved Search which is Personalization and limited only to the creator) , I want the newly added searchable field. for example Employee Number ( which is not there by default) to be made available to all the end users of Identity Self Service system..... Hope you got the problem...

User Management - Standard role.

Hi All,
I have to assign standard roles for User's to their respective modules/Areas (e.g MM,SD,QM,PP,FI).
I have searched on sdn regarding this but not got the solution.
So, if anyone has idea related User Management pls share.
All the answers r gr8ly appriciated.
Regards,
San

Hi,
Pls chk this links;
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a07122ae-8216-2a10-c9a5-996717a0648b
SAP BW Authorization
Regards
CSM Reddy

Field to distinguish standard users and user defined users

Hi,
   I want to distinguish the standard users and user defined users for getting one report to filter what are all the standard users in sap like sap*.....I dont know how to split the standard users and users created by us.is there any way to distinguish both the users
                                           Thanks in advance

>
J@Y wrote:
> In table USR04, MODBE is the Last changed by check if its your Zbatch, or any of your basis guyz initials on it. if not its standard created by SAP.
Nice try - but on my system SAP* has a MODBE of one of our basis people.

Using Lenovo Power Management as a Standard User

Hello,
Apologies up front if this isn't the proper forum but...
Running Win7 x64, LPM v3.59
Looking for a way to run it (Power Schemes, Settings, etc.) as a standard user. I do not want to provide users with the Admin Password for UAC. I've seen some older posts that run through deleting several reg keys, but I thought I remembered seeing a setting that provided this functionality to standard users?
Thanks,
Jason

which model of lenovo do you have?

Force users to view multiple items before moving on

In it's most basic form this is what I need to do.
I'll have three boxes. When the user clicks box A another box will appear containing a descrption of box A. When the user clicks box B, description box A will need to disappear and description box B will appear, etc. I think I know how to handle this portion using advanced actions, but is there a way to force users to view all 3 boxes before they can advance to the next slide? I think it should be able to be done in advanced actions but I'm not sure how to write something like that.

Nothing to apologize for.
the action looks good to me.
So your button is showing the language image, the language close button, then hiding some other things. The expression you have is right.
Your hide_languageDefinition adv action does the hide for the img_language. Instead of a 'standard action' you need a conditional action similar to your show_FDCPA_nextButton action you have above.
In that conditional screen where it says "untitled" you can have the action do several things. You'll need it to hide your img_language and the btn_languageClose like you have already. Since you want it to do the show/hide no matter what you can set it like this:
Action Type: Conditional action
Action Name: hide_languageDefintion
If:
(choose literal from the drop down)
Type a 1 in the text field
(choose 'is equal to' from the drop down)
(choose literal from the next drop down)
type a 1 in the text field.
You're saying "if 1=1, then do the actions below" 1 is always going to equal 1 so it's always going to run the actions.
Under actions put all your show/hide statements like you have above in hide_languageDefition
I suggest changing that 'untitled' name to something that makes sense to you.
Click on the next 'untitled' tab and add the conditional if/then statement like you have above in show_FDCPA_nextButton.
Find your languageClose button, and set it to run this advanced action.
What the action will do now is runs the hide actions you have. Then it looks at each variable to see if it is greater or equal to 1. if they're all true, then it shows the next button.
hope that makes sense; i can't attach screen shots from work, i apologize I can't help more.
As for variables, this recorded session might help you: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/event/index.cfm?event=register_no_session&id=1891451&loc=en_u s
picture a variable as a container.. a jar. That jar has a label and you can write anything you want on it (the name of the variable). That jar can contain 'stuff.' numbers, words, whatever you want to put in it. You can also manipulate what's in there with different functions of captivate. So let's say in your case I want to track if a learner clicks a button.
So I have my jar, and when the learner clicks a button I take a piece of blank paper, write a "1" on the paper and put it back in the jar. If they click that button again, I take out that paper, see a '1' on it, and I add 1 to it, and write '2' on the paper (this is your expression above 'btn_abussive_harassing_language = btn_abussive_harassing_language + 1').
When I'm closing the image, I pull out the jar, and look at the paper. If the paper has a 1 or higher written on it, I show the next button (after checking all 3 jars, that is).
That's the quick version of what variables are and how they work, I hope that helps.

Customizing a User Management OAF Page - Approach

Hi,
I have a requirement to customize a User Management Registration Page for external user.
I need to add 4 new fields on the page. Perform certain validations on those fields and then derive and pass PartyId value to the already existing column in the Entity object.
Entity object does not write directly in table but uses a "RegistrationBean" to insert row in the table.
Could you please tell me whats the best approach to do the customization.
Thanks!
Ritu
Edited by: user13715401 on Jul 19, 2012 7:56 AM

Hi Parag,
Thanks for looking into this.
I am trying to customize "B2CRegistrationPG" under "oracle.apps.fnd.umx.userAdmin.webui".
I am using "Individual User Registration" process. User Management -> Registration Processes -> Select Self Service Account creation in "Type" field.
To see this page on application, you need to setup profile option: "UMX: Register Here Link - Default Registration Process" to "Individual User Registration" at server level.
Launch Oracle applications login page. "register here" link will appear on th ehome page after setting the profile option. This link opens this page.
With the standard functionality this process creates a fnd user and a person party.
I want to include customer number field on this page. My requirement is to create party relationship along with fnd user and person party as mentioned above.
Oracle has provided a business even that create evrything I wanted just that I should be able to pass the party id to it through the OAF Page.
B2CRegistrationPG already contains OrganizationId formvalue. This formvalue is attached to View Instance -"OrganizationsVO" and view attribute - "PartyId".
OrganizationsVO is made of OrganizationsEO which contains the code to call registrationBean to set the partyid " registrationbean.setOrganizationPartyId(getPartyId().toString());"
I am trying to extend the controller on the "person information" region and set the form value in controller, which I have not been successful with. It just does not set OrganizationId form value.
Any kind of inputs will be appreciated
Thanks!
Ritu
Edited by: user13715401 on Jul 19, 2012 8:34 AM

Hiding fields in standard user management view

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for