High Resolution Stills

Is it possible to get high resolution stills from video using final cut pro? How do I do this? I desperately need to get printable images from video - with minimum expense!

''The whole dpi-ppi thing is nit-picking.''
No Danny boy - it’s actually a matter of understanding what resolution is - you are perpetuating a myth that confuses too many people. Every week at least I have to explain to customers the implications of incorrectly demanding images should be a certain 'dpi' setting. Some of their mistakes are costly!
The hard n fast rule is - do not use dots per inch to describe a digital image, only ever use the number of pixels.
Dots per inch are only used in setting print output using ink, from office inkjet printers to web offset lithographic machines, it means; ink dots per inch, not pixels, frames per second or pints of beer.
‘’When one creates graphics the resolution should be 72 dpi.
It is the actual pixels that are important.’’
You contradict yourself in the same paragraph:
There is no setting in any software application that can set dpi to format a digital image, you can only specify the number of pixels.
‘’Screen resolution on a CRT is effectively 72 ppi(or dpi).’’
Screen resolution is not 72 and not dpi - screen resolution is measured in megahertz and line pairs per millimetre, the same way as a video camera is measured. Screen resolution measures the display device and has nothing to do with the number of pixels in an image file; you are confusing these two concepts. Each model of display has a different resolving power, as do cameras; so to blandly saying all screens have the same specification is wrong.
’This is why a 13 inch CRT shows exactly the same picture as a 36 inch CRT.’’
Good grief NO
An 1024x768 picture would only show a small part of the image if shown on a 800x600 display
A 13-inch CRT would display the same number of PIXELS as a 36 inch CRT if the image is less than or equal to the maximum pixel size of the screen.
If you would like to know where the number 72 comes from, and why it is incorrect to use dpi as a digital image measurement, read the following:
www.scantips.com/no72dpi.html
If readers would like to know when and how to use dpi settings correctly, read the following printer manufacturers info:
www.photoexpert.epson.co.uk/UK/EXPERTISE/howto_choose_scanres.htm
best regards
Gary

Similar Messages

  • High resolution PDF still generates low resolution drop shadows?

    I have created a series of print ads in InDesign CS5.5 to be run in magazines, and at the bottom of the page is the company's logo, with a drop shadow applied to it within InDesign. Nothing strange there. Upon exporting the PDF, I use the Press Quality settings which by default are made to create 300 dpi PDFs. The only changes I make in the settings is adding bleed and crop marks, I don't change anything that could affect the resolution or transparency settings. But still, the magazine's print-technician always replies that the shadows in my document have a low resolution.
    Up until now I have told him to not worry and run it anyway, and the results have been fine - I haven't noticed any problems with the quality of the print in the magazine. But it really annoys me that I keep getting these error messages - I want to create perfect PDFs! Why on earth are my shadows ending up as low resolution images?
    The only thing I can imagine might be a sign of an issue is under the Advanced-tab in my Export-settings. The Transparency Flattener section (which I, to be honest, am not quite sure what it is) is set to medium resolution, and is greyed out - meaning I can't change it to high resolution. Could this be what is causing it? And if so, how do I fix it?

    I don't spend a lot of time with Acrobat's preflight, but it looks like it assumes what the flattener preset will be at output even though it could be anything.
    The default Press Quality preset exports live transparency with the flattener grayed out as Medium and it looks like Acrobat preflight considers that even though nothing has been flattened yet. So, here I've made a 3" sqaure box and exported it with Press Quality and prefilght tells me it's roughly 200ppi (which by the way is plenty for a dropshadow):
    If I change the preset to High (set the Compatibility to 1.3, which lets you set the flattener to High, then reset compatibility to 1.4):
    Then Acrobat's preflight tells me the shadow will have more resolution:

  • Extract photo stills in high resolution

    I need some stills of the work i've finished, but I only know the appleshift4 trick.
    Is there a way to export a photo still from FCP to somewhere else in high resolution? (I have recorded in 24P MiniDV)
    Thank you.

    export quicktime conversion, still image and choose the parameters. They will not be high resolution. they will be 720x480 (which you will need to resize in photoshop (or whatever) to 720 x 534 to adjust for rectangular pixels (video) vs. square pixels (computer and print) 72dpi.
    I suggest that you read the manual. This is pretty basic stuff.

  • How to fix lost connections to original high-resolution pictures in iPhoto and how to import an iPhoto Book from one iPhoto library to another

    Hi there,
    I am using a MBP Pro with 8 GB cache and 1 TB HDD from beginning of 2011 with OS X Yosemite and iPhoto version 9.6 (910.29).
    I created an iPhoto Book to print which contains my best pictures of 2013 and 2014. Then I got an error message when I wanted to print the book, saying (translated from German):
    Book could not be created.
    With photo p233432343.jpg there was an error. The original version of that photo with full resolution could not be found or is damaged. Please replace the photo or delete it from your book.
    When I enquired further, I found out, that many, many pictures in my iPhoto library have that problem - only the thumbnail picture is found by iPhoto, but not the one with the high resolution. When looking at the photos in detail one sees that they are not sharp because obviously the photo book only refers to the thumbnail. When I went into the iPhoto Library using Finder, I saw that the original high res photos are still there. As there are an estimated 3000 photos with a lost connection (some still have, it but about 1/2 of my photos don´t), it does not make sense to import those photos manually. This photo book is just the tip of the iceberg, so to say.
    Then I looked for solutions in some forums. I had two lPhoto libraries, one on my HDD (120GB) and one on an external HDD (175GB). Assuming there might be problems, I have deleted (moved) the one on my HDD, because the "right one" is the one on my external HDD and started iPHoto again using the alt key. But that did not work either.
    I then tried to repair my iPhoto library using iPhoto Library Manager, and merged and rebuilt libraries. The library that came out was crap - all folders that had lost connections to the high resolution pictures now have zero photos in it. Also it is lacking the projects, including the photo book I created.
    Then I went to find out if there is a way to import the iphoto book project from the old, corrupt library into the new, repaired library but could not find anything. It can only be exported as a file structure or website. As the file structure is missing the high res pictures, that does not even solve the "little" problem of the photobook.
    I would REALLY appreciate your help on the two questions:
    1- Can you advise what I need to to do to to get the connection to the high resolution photos established again  ? As it is more than 3000 photos, I use an automated way of reestablishing that connection. Probably an answer to this question would make question 2 irrelevant.
    2- Do you know if there is a way to export and import a book project created in iPhoto from one library to another ?

    1 - Select  the thumbnail of one of the problem photos and use the File ➙ Reveal in Finder ➙ Original menu option.  This will take you to the folder containing the original file with that file selected by the Finder. 
    You can also use Find Any File to search for that file (get the file name from the Info pane in iPhoto). You will find the thumbnail version and maybe an edited version also.  Made sure what is found is the large, original version and note were it's located.  Search all of your drives with FAF just in case.
    If you don't fine the full sized version then the only recourse is to use a file recovery application like   SubrosaSoft FileSalvage on your drives to see if any of your full sized photos can be recovered.   If you find enough files to make the purchase of the software worthwhile buy it and recover the files.  However, since it may have been quite a while since you discovered the missing originals it seems unlikely you'll be able to recover any due to being overwritten.
    2 - book projects are just entries in the library databases and can't be exported to another library. 

  • Forum oddity, w.r.t high resolution screen.

    I started a thread on Windows/ Photoshop entitled "CS4 with a high resolution screen". People have replied to this, according to e-mail direct response. However, it is not on the list of forums, and neither does it appear on 'search'.
    To repeat: we have a high resolution HP LP 3065 screen, which supports up to 2560 x 1600 pixels. At this resolution, images are still less than print size, but CS4 is essentially unusable because the menu text and other icons do not scale. Does anyone know if it is possible to manage this silly interface to allow the user to see what they are doing? Is there even a visual disability option? Even MS Office 2000 - ten years old - allows "large icons".
    If not, I think this is another way in which CS4 is in fact worse than CS3, which (mostly) used the Windows UI and which was therefore considerably more flexible. The screen in question is supported by dual DVI connections to an Nvidia FX3700 card - a CUDA multiprocessor device optimised for 2D images and CAD - and an eight processor, 3 GHz machine. With all of this processor power, CS4 is still much slower than CS3 on a single processor laptop. The paint follows the pen by several centimetres, like early Photoshop on a pre-Pentium processor.

    I started this by saying that through an oddity of this forum software, my original thread had vanished from the list. Exactly the same thing happened to this one, which i had to find through searching the forum list. The previous one vanished completely. One appears to get a different list if one comes in via a direct URL or via support > Forums > windows: an .asp error, presumably, but Adobe please note.
    Someone asked why use a high res screen. If you work on a large image, you either operate at the pixel level - a plate on a table top if you are at 1020 x 768 and working with a 20 megapixel image - or you shrink the thing down to fit. In the latter case, each pixel that you see is, depending on the native image size, an average of a large number of adjacent pixels. In the case of a 24Meg image and the above screen size, each visible pixel is an average (or however Adobe calculate it) of a bit over 20 pixels from the native image. If you look at 2560 x 1600 you are still seeing a composite, but of a quarter fewer source pixels per point. If you look at the natve image as 'actual pixels', the 'dinner plate' is four time bigger in proportion to that of the SVGA image.
    That said, imagine the layers pallet in which one layer has, let's say, a football set against an group of players , P/shop users will expect to see a black blob representing its position in the layer. At high resolution, however, the blob is represented on the screen by a patch that is smaller than a full stop on a page of type, and essentially invisible from 150 cm from the screen. Thus: squint, lean forward, mutter angrily.
    Why can one not set the icons and the ephemeral facilities such as the layers pallet to be any size you want? It is really very silly.

  • Security set to allow high resolution printing but pdf won't print

    We create a large number of pdf files to send out to
    clients, etc. We have been using security on all pdf's being sent out, however, some clients are having issues printing these pdf files even though our security settings are set to allow high resolution printing. Any one have any ideas why? I cannot duplicate the issue for whatever reason, the files still print for me.

    I discover I am suddenly having a similar problem as well.
    I have recently migrated to a new Intel iMac/Leopard, I'm on a network and trying to print to a Tektronix/Xerox 7700 laser printer. I can print anything other kind of document on that printer as long as it is not a PDF.
    When I open the printer window it says the job has been stopped. I choose the job and tell it to "resume" at which point the printer pauses itself. Once it flashed a window that said Operation Not Possible - client-error-something-something and then closed before I could see what the last two words were.
    I am currently using Adobe Reader 6.0. I would love to be able to try to print out of 7.0 but there seem to be continual download problems in the form of constant connection failures. I also have Acrobat 6.0 STD - can't print out of either one.

  • Help- How do I Make a High Resolution Gif in Flash?

    So I've been surfing the net trying to find a way to get a 100% resolution from Flash to Gif and can't find it.
    Here is the deal, I've got CS5 Premium Suit and I started doing animation in photoshop. It took forever but once I got it done it looked awesome and I could easily transfer it into a gif via 'save for web and devices".
    Because it was taking forever I decided to learn flash and after a day I got the basics pretty much figured out and made my first .swf file. I then went to turn it into a Gif and the resolution sucked and the timing was off. I found out that you can clean it up a bit through Publish settings which helped a lot but still any gradients are off.
    Is there a way to get a high resolution gif out of Flash to look as good as my photoshop animation gif?
    Thanks in advance.
    Done in Flash (Click to see)              Done in Photoshop (Click to see)
    Micah

    Hello? I posted this in the annimated tips sup-forum but I was told to ask it here. What is the deal with this. Is there even a way I can manualy adjust the compression of these files besides "losy" or "losless" because it sure it losing stuff in losless?
    Is photoshop really the program I have to do my animation in if I want to maintain clearity in my graphics?
    What the crap! Why would Adobe do this, Why is it compressing my files in such a way that is distorting the gradients and colors?
    Anyone?

  • Is it possible to convert a PDF to a high resolution image with ColdFusion?

    I would like to determine how to convert PDFs to high resolution images using ColdFusion.
    I'm running ColdFusion 9,0,0,251028 on CentOS 5.5 with Apache 2.2.3.
    The <cfpdf action = "thumbnail" ...> is all well and good for creating 72 dpi images of a PDF, but I need to be able to create 300 dpi images of a PDF.
    The PDFs in question have a much higher level of detail available than 72 dpi.
    The related scale attribute for the action="thumbnail" functionality has an accepted range of 1 to 100, but an example of what I need is something more like a value of 415.
    I should mention that I did try to use the jpgdpi attribute, and set it to 300 dpi . . . which produced a JPG that was indeed set to 300 dpi, but still had the same pixel dimensions as the 72 dpi image, so this did not affect the pdf to jpg conversion process in any way to make the image higher resolution.
    Alternatively, would another possibility be to use ColdFusion to alter the dimensions of the pdf to be 415% of its original dimensions in memory, and then output a 100% thumbnail of that altered PDF? Is this possible? I can not for the life of me work out how to alter the set dimensions of a PDF via ColdFusion, in order to determine if this would have an affect on the size of the thumbnail produced.
    Or more broadly, how would you use ColdFusion to convert a PDF to a (or a series of) high resolution images?
    Thanks in advance for any help on this.

    Another idea:
    Use a third party tool with CFEXECUTE if there's no other way. As you're on Linux you could easily run ghostscript on the command line to do it. gs lets you specify filetype as the device and also has options for resolution. For Windows there's gs as well (not sure though what it's command line capabilities are there) or tools like this: http://www.softinterface.com/Convert-PDF-To-Image/Convert-PDF-To-Tiff.htm
    Cheers
    Kai

  • Are There Any Advantages To High Resolution Displays?

    I am looking to buy a new 17 inch MacBook Pro at the end of this month and seeking practical advice on configuration options I should choose.
    I am curious about what other people think of the advantages and disadvantages of the high resolution displays. Perhaps it is just a personal preference on the part of different users but non-graphics users I have talked to who have used the high res screens say they don't like them and why but I have yet to talk to any artists who have used them and whether artists find real advantages. My feeling is that it would be good to be able to fit a larger (more pixels) image on the screen or is it better to just leave high res screens to those who work with high definition video/animation?
    My usage of the computer is largely in Photoshop and other graphics programs like Painter, and web design.

    Just to be clear, though, reducing the resolution of an LCD can have a negative effect on image quality. LCDs have an optimal "native" resolution and setting the resolution below that native level results in a poorer quality image.
    Leopard claims "resolution independence" - I have not tried it yet, but if you read the description of this feature, you will note that it applies to the user interface elements. Granted, that's often what you notice the most (i.e. the problem with reducing the resolution below native for an LCD is that the text in Finder, all of the menu bar items, etc., looks "fuzzy"). By appropriately scaling the UI elements, Leopard overcomes the limitation. But the "fuzzyness" will still apply to non-UI things that are displayed - i.e. images. Since based on your posts you will be working with images primarily, high-res vs. standard is still a choice I'd recommend considering carefully, and ideally by trying them both side-by-side.
    Ps. Thanks for awarding points!

  • Increasing physical dimensions of high resolution image?

    I have an image that I want to use in a video, though it is not physically large enough to fill the 1920 x 1080 dimensions of the video, though it has a 300ppi resolution and video only needs 72ppi. How do I take advantage of the fact that it is high resolution image, and increase the physical dimensions of the image? Is there a way to do this?
    Thanks.

    Hi Marian.
    Thanks for the excellent link. And I believe it is spot on.
    ***Warning: This is an off topic rant. And it's over 500 words.***
    I did not get my first computer until 2001. Although I am a scientist at heart (university trained in chemistry and physics), and quite comfortable with technology, there was something deep within me that was resistant to buying a computer. Almost an inner foreboding. Even though I had already been using corporate computer nets (not the internet) since 1979, the PC seemed ominous to me.
    And the internet seemed even more ominous. To the point that I didn't hook up to the web until 2006. I had a sense that the web was a double edged sword, and had the potential to diminish its users. Even though I had never been on line and had very little idea of what it was really all about. What I found was what I feared. A wasteland punctuated by oases of useful information. A wasteland in the literal sense. For every second saved on the task at hand, a minute is wasted by the distractions that bombard us on the way to saving that second.
    I'm not saying that the web is bad. Just that it's fraught with danger. And the worst danger is the notion that a concrete answer to every question is just a Google away. And with that, the odieous notion that every question can be answered comprehensively in one quarter of an internet page, leaving the rest for advertising.
    I do quite a bit of writing, and my first experience at writing for the internet was a disaster. Among other things, I am a fly fishing guide. A new internet fly fishing magazine had requested I submit a series of articles. Personal anecdotes about my experiences. The first article I submitted was about 2400 words. They loved it, but they said it said it was too long. So, I did a rewrite. It came in at 1800 words. And the rewrite took more time and effort than writing the original 2400 words. And the article was diminished. And still too long. They wanted it shorter.
    At this point, I dug in my heels. I admitted I understood such constraints on paper publishing, but how could they insist on such constraints on web publishing? How much does is cost to add a web page to an article? It's just another page they could slather with advertising. To which they replied, no one will read an article longer than 1200 words. I was flabbergasted. I like long articles and books. I'm bummed when I come to the end. In the end, these folks had an editor hack it down to 1200 words and publish it over my signature without my knowledge or permission. When I saw the article, I was appalled. I didn't recognize it. And demanded they take it down.
    Maybe the publisher was right about his readers having short attention spans. I hope not, but I'm afraid it's true. And this mindset is the 500 pound gorilla in the room that few want to address.
    I'm not by any stretch suggesting we should turn back the clock of progress. Only that we need to be aware of the negative potential of any new technology. And resist that negative potential with all our hearts. Or our minds will suffer.
    FWIW.
    Peace,
    Lee

  • How to make high resolution image?

    Hi All, I am in an urgent requirement where I have few .tif images. There size is very high. When I am uploading, there resolution is not good and they are automatically converted to jpg.
    Can some one tell me "How to make this image high resolution image" Is there any setting or tips and tricks?
    Reply immidiatly,

    The original image is in MDM. I think what you may be getting confused by is the thumbnail view. The thumbnail view is automatically generated to give you just a low res view of the original from within MDM, likely for the sake of performance.
    If you go to the Images table and right click on the image and select "view original" you will see that the high res original that was loaded is still there. You can also create image variants through the Console to generate other versions of the original to use for web or print. I don't think you can change the defaults used for the thumbnail.

  • Portege R930 - BSOD when connecting high resolution monitor to HDMI port

    Hello.
    I have the Portege R930 (pt331a-01w001) running window 7. Everything on the laptop works as expected, however when I plug the laptop into a high resolution monitor (2560x1440) via the HDMI port I get blue screen of death.
    I can use the HDMI port to connect to my 1080p LCD TV and my work monitor which is a lower resolution and it works ok.
    I have tried multiple cables and different monitors of the same resolution.
    Can anyone assist?

    Hello,
    Yes that is correct. When my laptop is connected to a monitor with a lower resolution that 2560x1440 (such as my work monitor (1680x1050) or my TV (1080p)) everything works as expected.
    Once I plug it into the 2560x1440 monitor I get BSOD.
    The monitor only has a DVI-D Dual link port, so I am using a HDMI to DVI-D Dual link cable to connect the laptop HDMI port to the monitor.
    I was getting this fault with the original display driver (not sure of the version), I then updated to the Toshiba driver (v8.15.10.2712) and also tried the Intel Driver (9.17.10.2932) and still get the same problem.

  • Replace photos with higher resolution versions?

    A professional photographer sent me a DVD with about 1,000 photos on it from an event I hosted.  I imported them all into iPhoto and made a couple of photo books out of them (but didn't yet get them printed).  I noticed the resolution wasn't what I expected, so the photographer sent me a new DVD with higher resolution versions.  Same filenames.  Is there any way to import the new versions into iPhoto, replacing the old ones?  Ideally they would appear in the photo books, too!  I'd hate to have to spend hours recreating what I did.
    Thanks!

    I don't think so, iPhoto is designed to prevent "collisions" between similar file names, so you can't just import them. You would have to do major surgery to the iPhoto Library, which is not a good idea. And still might not work.
    I think you should just re-import and start over.

  • Opinions About New High Resolution Displays

    Does anyone have an opinion about the MacBook Pro's new high resolution display option. The price doesn't seem to be that big of a deal. My concern is that the higher number of pixels for the same screen area will mean smaller text display. Am I correct about this?

    Yes, you're correct about the text getting smaller, however that may not be the case for much longer. What I'm speaking of is the resolution independent ui in Leopard - where your ui can still remain the "regular" size that you're used to, but everything is still at a higher resolution...
    ummm don't really know how to explain it any better - take a look at this wiki article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolution_independence
    So I personally wont even think about upgrading till Leopard comes out - I used 1920x1200 displays on some laptops in the past, and everything is WAY too small for comfortable use.

  • Photoshop Font Sizes too Small on High Resolution Screen

    On my Toshiba Satellite P55T 4K the Photoshop fonts and tool menus are so small that they are very difficult to read.  I have set the UI fonts to the largest size, but they are still way too small. Is there a way to further increase the font and tool menu sizes?

    You must have a very high resolution screen, also called HiDpi.
    If you have Photoshop CC 2014, you can go to Edit > Preferences > Experimental Features and checkmark "Scale UI 200%"
    If you have CC, CS6, or below, there is no way to scale the UI as of yet. There may not be. These products are no longer being updated.
    At best I can recommend reducing the resolution down to around 1400 px horizontal. That's not the native resolution and defeats the purpose of having a Hidpi screen.
    So only thing left aside from returning the laptop, is to work with a large external monitor, or for $10/monthly, join the Photography Plan and you can use CC 2014 and the 200% UI.

Maybe you are looking for

  • End User Login Message

    Hi Folks, Our production IDM setup has 3 IDM instances sharing the same repository. The IDM End user is used for setting passwords in IDM and LDAP. Recently, couple of users have reported this error while trying to log in into IDM end user login page

  • I can´t  update my macbook

    I can´t uptade my macbook now is update 10.5.8 how can i update her??

  • Apple TV won't power off?

    The light is on....remote makes it go out for a second...then light comes back on.  Help?

  • Location and Category in sap xi logging

    I deployed sap sample adapter in pck, now I can see the log outputted by trace object with category, but i cannot see the trace info outputted by the trace object without category, who can help me? Message was edited by: Spring Tang Message was edite

  • Set Authorisation ---- Report Layout Manager

    Hi experts             Recently i upgraded my SAP B1 2007 B to SAP 8.8 PL:12 and when i tried to set the authorization for using crystal report an .dmp file get created and error msg box get displayed and SAP client get closed.             Administra