Historical Logging Queue Overflow

Generating an error "Historical Logging Queue Overflow" Error Code -1967390689. At this time my data logger turns off, no longer allowing me to log data. My input and output queues sizes are roughly 20,000 and my buffer size is 30,000. Possible errors? My database is not very big, I have only run this file for a little over 24hrs. I have not had time to accumulate much data.

What are the deadband settings that you are using on the objects you are logging? It appears that the values may be changing so rapidly, that an overflow is occurring before the data can actually be written to the database. You may want to check out the following KnowledgeBase, as it may have some useful information.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/3efedde4322fef19862567740067f3cc/862567530005f09e862567c700746a65?OpenDocument
Hope this helps,
Patrick R.

Similar Messages

Log Queue Overflows in SCM+Live Cache system

Hello Friends,
Log Queue Overflows showing RED alert in SCM Live cache, Please help me How to solve this issue.
Regards,
Balaram

User Basis wrote:
Dears,
>
> In my system some problems are occurring with log queues.
> The following message is presented in my system:
> Log queue overflows: 70641, configured log queue pages: 2000 for each of 4 log queues
>
Ok, so what is the problem with that?
You use the liveCache quite heavily (e.g. make lots of commits/changes) and the storage where you put your log-volume to is not quick enough to save the data.
Either you fix the storage speed or you accept that your users might have to wait a bit longer for their application to save the data.
User Basis wrote:
> I think it is occurring because we are managing the Log with "Log automatic overwrite". This configuration is being used because we don´t have a lot of disk space to manage it as well.
> Al jey.
These two things have no connection.
A log queue overflow simply means, that sessions have to wait until the log queue is saved to disk before they can put new entries to the log queue.
The log mode overwrite means: you don't care about data security and the ability to recover the liveCache from a backup.
It's a setting used for throw-away database instances where it doesn't matter to loose data.
It means that the database simply overwrites log entries that have not been backed up, when the log area gets filled.
regards,
Lars

Error "Event Queue Overflowed" with the "Write file to Citadel Server"

Hello,
I can import data from a file and I can see the data
in the historical database without troubling.
But I always have this error "Event Queue Overflowed", that don't perturb my data and my application (I have just this boring message).
I have tried many things :
- increasing the size of my input buffer (-> 1.000.000, no change) : I don't think so that it's important because I've tried with a value of 100 and anyway sometimes my application works with this small value of 100.
- increasing the File_location tag size (-> 260). No change.
- My write to Citadel.cfg is in the LabVIEW folder.
Can you help me ?
Thank you.

Hi,
What version of LabVIEW DSC are you using? if it is 6.1, have you applied fixes linked below.
http://digital.ni.com/softlib.nsf/websearch/513AA4A0BB60D10086256B48006D44B5?opendocument
I have seen a similar issue at the link below.
http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RNAME=ViewQuestion&HOID=5065000000080000008C640000&ECategory=LabVIEW.Datalogging+and+Supervisory+Control
Please let me know if you have read it through?
Best Regards,
Remzi A.

FW-4-TCP_OoO_SEG: TCP reassembly queue overflow - session

After upgrading a Cisco 892 to IOS c890-universalk9-mz.151-4.M3.bin from c890-universalk9-mz.124-22.YB.bin(reason was tracebacks) we have noticed the following message's in the logging:
%FW-4-TCP_OoO_SEG: Dropping TCP Segment: seq:1628726886 1492 bytes is out-of-order; expected seq:1628698086. Reason: TCP reassembly queue overflow - session x:42024 to x:80 on zone-pair ccp-zp-in-out class ccp-protocol-http
%FW-4-TCP_OoO_SEG: Deleting session as expected TCP segment with seq:972828144 has not arrived even after 25 seconds - session x:57229 to x:80 on zone-pair ccp-zp-in-out class ccp-protocol-http
After some research we tuned the timers of the tcp reassembly
ip inspect max-incomplete high 8000
ip inspect max-incomplete low 7900
ip inspect one-minute high 8000
ip inspect one-minute low 7900
ip inspect udp idle-time 360
ip inspect dns-timeout 10
ip inspect tcp idle-time 7200
ip inspect tcp finwait-time 10
ip inspect tcp max-incomplete host 1000 block-time 0
ip inspect tcp reassembly queue length 1024
ip inspect tcp reassembly timeout 60
ip inspect tcp reassembly memory limit 256000
However the message's still appear and i cant explain why the sh ip inspect statistics is empty
#sh ip inspect statistics
Interfaces configured for inspection 0
Session creations since subsystem startup or last reset 0
Current session counts (estab/half-open/terminating) [0:0:0]
Maxever session counts (estab/half-open/terminating) [0:0:0]
Last session created never
Last statistic reset never
Last session creation rate 0
Maxever session creation rate 0
Last half-open session total 0
TCP reassembly statistics
received 0 packets out-of-order; dropped 0
peak memory usage 0 KB; current usage: 0 KB
peak queue length 0
The message's did not occur while running c890-universalk9-mz.124-22.YB

Thank you for youre reply.
I have also tried the paramet-map ooo settings but these also didnt resolve the issue.
Im not getting any complaints from the clients at the site.
I will go onsite next week and will do some testing/sniffing.
UPDATE:
After tweaking the buffers and time outs the TCP reassembly queu overflow message does not occur anymore.
Now only the following message occurs:
%FW-4-TCP_OoO_SEG: Deleting session as expected TCP segment with seq:4121294117 has not arrived even after 900 seconds - session xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx on zone-pair ccp-zp-in-out class ccp-protocol-http.
During an onsite test the test client also generated this message however the client did not notice this and his download and the speed where OK.
Thread can be closed

Log buffer overflow

I have been receiving the flex log buffer overflow error for a long time. I don't believe it is causing any problem but I'm not sure.
I have Iplanet Web Server 4.1 on Solaris 2.6.
I have changed the LogFlushInterval from the default 30 seconds to 5 seconds.
I am logging a great deal of information
My questions are...
should I be concerned ?
when I get that error is the buffer being immediately dumped to the log file ?
am I losing any log information ?
can I increase the buffer size ?
should I reduce the LogFlushInterval any more ?
Thanks

The error message indicates that an access log entry exceeded the maximum of 4096 bytes and was truncated. You should check the access log file for suspicious entries.
Adjusting LogFlushInterval won't affect this problem, and unfortunately there's no way to increase flex log buffer size.

Queue overflow errors in tag engine.

I was testing the 310 tags in my tag database using the interactive server tester, when I encountered the queue overflow error. I am storing and retrieving values in a Allen Bradley SLC 5/04 PLC module. I am using RSLinx as an OPC server. I tried increasing the queue, but still ended up with the error. How will a queue overflow effect the performance of the tag engine and are there ways to better pinpoint the problem?
Thanks,
Mike Thomson
[email protected]

Mike,
Check out these links...
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/3efedde4322fef19862567740067f3cc/862567530005f09e862567c700746a65?OpenDocument
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/2d17d611efb58b22862567a9006ffe76/120e7a0c342df3fa86256812005c056c?OpenDocument
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/2d17d611efb58b22862567a9006ffe76/bb7a08241bb0797c86256812005d1f3c?OpenDocument
and if they don't help, then write back with info like: Version of LabVIEW in the Help>> about LabVIEW
Have you ran the update to LV DSC to 6.0.2?
Find out by going to Start>>Settings>>Control Panel>>add/remove programs>> just LOOK for LV Datalogging and supervisory control version.
Version of Logos?... find the lkopc.exe Properties>>Version
Let me know if further problems exist
Thanks,
Bryce

Set up MQ interconnect log queue and MQ sequence/transaction id queues?

Does the log queue and sequence queue get set up in standard MQ server install?
Can the log and sequence queue also point to the actual queue?
It looks like a standard MQ client only needs the channel and send queue (the actual queue that is the destination for inbound (to the MQ server) messages).
Whereas the oracle mq adapter requires 3 inbound queues; actual, log, and transaction id.
Any help/more documentation/additional install guides/tips would be greatly appreciated.
thanks

Yes you do. The log queue must be created on the MQ side and you specify it in your link set tup. Oracle requires that to guarantee "deliver once and only once" in case of errors. If you don't specify that, Oracle will warn you. It's easy for the MQ admin to create. Just ask them.

Flex Log Buffer Overflow Error

Hello,
We are running SunOne Server 6 SP4 on Solaris 2.8.
We have a site that has numerous URL Forwards that all work. We added another one today and when you try and go to that one we get the following error in the error log:
flex log buffer overflow- greater than 4096 characters
Any help on what this means and how to fix it?
thanks!!

We found the problem.
We had a recursive URL call.
example: what not to do when setting up URL forwards.
URL Forward /emp directory to /emp/some_file

PSC-ETH Error Query.vi Instrument reports: Queue overflow

Bonjour a tous,
J'essaie actuellemet de controler un Power Supply SM3000 a l'aide d'un PSC-ETH et de LabVIEW 2010.
J'ai donc telecharge le CD fourni a l'adresse suivante : http://www.delta-elektronika.nl/en/products/accessories/psc-eth.html qui contient les drivers et des exemples.
J'essaie d'utiliser l'exemple PSC-ETH TCP Demo application.vi mais l'erreur -350 "Instrument reports: Queue overflow" apparait. D'apres ce que j'ai vu sur les forums, il faut utiliser le Tag Configuration Editor, aller dans Configure, Engine, Server, mais lorsque j'ouvre cet editeur, aucune trace de Configure...
Merci d'avance pour votre aide,
Pich
Pièces jointes :
PSC-ETH TCP Demo application.vi ‏167 KB
PSC_ETH.llb ‏1808 KB

Bonjour,
Merci d'avoir posté sur le forum NI.
Votre problème est une partie intégrante du driver que vous avez téléchargé. Je vous dirige donc vers le support du fabricant qui aura certainement plus d'informations afin de résoudre votre problème.
Cordialement,
Nicolas M.
National Instruments France
#adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
Journées Techniques LabVIEW 2012 : du 27 septembre au 22 novembre
2 sessions en parallèle : Débuter a...

LIN Write Queue Overflow - Help

I am having "Write Queue overflow" error for the LIN monitoring program.
Basically, I am sending a master message to my DUT and same time monitoring the slave message from the DUT.
The problem always happen, the smaller value I put the timer, the faster I get the error.
Details are as attached screenshot.
Attachments:
LIN Error.JPG ‏202 KB

Hello. I have a similar problem. As you can see for the attached program (only part of the main code), I am trying to do something relatively easy. I want to write to the LIN bus and then read the information that is sent to me by the prototype board (includes a PIC microcontroller that deals with the LIN bus). In order to achieve this I initially copied large parts of the “write header frame and receive LIN” example. I have produced my own LIN analyser txt box which is at the top of the loop.
I replaced the write button with a timer that has selectable period. I would like to write to the bus with minimum period of 1ms. What happens is that the program will stop writing at random intervals (which can also be seen from the LED of the LIN device which I use as interface (NI USB-8476s)). The biggest mystery is why the program (although it keeps running) it stops writing. By using the attrvalue of the read vi I don’t see any queues of data and I don’t get the over flow error. Even the timeout vi attributes are in accordance with the write vi (i.e. 2 for successful write, 0 when the program stops writing, meaning that I can’t really understand anything from that). I managed to “overcome” the problem by auto resetting the loop every time it stops but I’m not happy with this solution because I would like to know somehow why I get this problem and if can solve it without resets. Is there a way to see the queues that exist inside the write vi? Do I overload the bus? And if yes how could see that?
Kind regards
Theo
PS: I have attached 2 subvis that you will need to run the main body (ignore the other ones -not needed for this part)
PS2: The start and end contain also some attibutes that i may not really need, just included them when i was experimenting!
Attachments:
Lin.llb ‏126 KB
LIN Initial.vi ‏25 KB
LIN End.vi ‏20 KB

Application server queue overflow,application server overloaded currently

dear Experts,
please check my problem and give me one solution
here iam trying to solve this problem but not getting result i,e
today i installed one system (nw2005sr3) and after that
i created one client for log in to this client i created parameter and save it
then i stoped my application server and started after
when i double clicked my gui application server is shown an error that error is
Error:
application server queue over flow
application server is overloaded currently,try another application server do you want to see error log
what happened for my server please give me some guidence for solution
Regards
Edited by: swathimatta on Sep 21, 2010 5:27 PM

hi Experts,
its my mistaq my version is wrongly typed nw2004s
i tried for to check from os level
but dpmon also not found
i did not get what is an error
why is shows this error and what is this means (application server overflow)
Regards

RecipientThreadLimitExceeded in message tracking logs, queuing and holding up local email delivery to office365

Please let me know if anyone knows an answer to this one... We're in a Hybrid Exchange environment, with 2 x Exchange 2007 servers, and 1 x Exchange 2013 Hybrid server which is pointing to Office 365 for the purposes of relaying mail to O365 while
we migrate our users out there.
We have just finished migrating, but just a couple of days ago we started experiencing delays in email delivery to O365... Not all mail, but some! Incoming email or locally generated email gets relayed out through the Hybrid server and out to O365,
but not all email is delayed... only some, but it's constant. During the busiest part of the day, about 200 messages are sitting in the Queue in Exch2013... but they all eventually resolve between 5 and 45minutes. The users are not happy.
The last error in the queue viewer for each hung email reads: 451 4.4.0 Temporary server error. Please try again later.
If I look at the message tracking logs, I find an interesting item -- "RecipientThreadLimitExceeded":
2014-05-15T14:15:51.608Z,192.168.3.11,hydra,207.46.163.215,company-mail-onmicrosoft-com.mail.protection.outlook.com,RecipientThreadLimitExceeded,Outbound to Office 365,SMTP,DEFER,10307921510617,<[email protected]>,885ea3ce-a020-41b1-8950-08d13e58d6d3,[email protected],451
4.4.0 Temporary server error. Please try again later,10117,1,,,Read: This is your generic subject line,[email protected],[email protected],2014-05-15T14:16:51.608Z,Undefined,,,,S:Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.MailRecipient.RequiredTlsAuthLevel=Opportunistic;S:Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.MailRecipient.EffectiveTlsAuthLevel=EncryptionOnly;S:DeliveryPriority=Normal
I have tried to find some documentation on resolution for this RecipientThreadLimitExceeded error, but I can only come up with some Exchange 2011 documentation which recommends adding some entries to the EdgeTransport.exe.config file to bump up the RecipientThreadLimit
value... I have not found anything pertaining to 2013. I cannot even find any powershell commands to see what the current RecipientThreadLimit is on 2013! Aghg!
Has anyone seen this before, or have any recommendations?
Thank you,
Mike

After many days of frustration, Microsoft Support finally resolved this issue. Believe it or not, but the issue was actually on the Office365 side. Here's the fix:
Exchange Admin Center -> Mail Flow -> Connectors -> Inbound Connectors
Open your "Inbound from <guid>" with the "On-premises" connector type
Click on Scope -> scroll down to "Associated accepted domains"
We had an entry in there "<organization>.mail.onmicrosoft.com"... Microsoft support had us remove this entry so that the box was completely empty.
That RESOLVED it... amazing what what little entry could do. We've had this entry in there for about 2 months, and it had been working fine. Support acknowledged that several customers have had this issue, that they are working on getting it
fixed on the back-end.
Hope this helps somebody...
-Mike

Duplicate data in historical log when changing time

Having changed the time on the computer which the Lookout Timeserver uses to synchronize its clock, my Hypertrends show that the Citadel database has two sets of data for logged objects during the overlapped time period. The Hypertrend cursor reports values for the data that was written to the database first. Unfortunately, I am most interested in the data that was recorded second. Querying the Citadel database using Excel and Microsoft Query results in null values for the overlapped time period. Is there any way to extract the second set of data for this time period other than visually recording points off the Hypertrend graph?

Remzi,
I am currently using Lookout 4.0.1 build 61 along with LabView 7.0 and MAX 3.0.1. I do not currently have the DSC software required for viewing historical data in MAX, but is there any evidence it would extract data any differently than the hypertrend cursor or Microsoft Query used with Excel? The only evidence I have that the two sets of data reside in the Citadel database is that both traces are recorded in the hypertrend viewer.
Mark Nornberg

Historical Log of E-mail Adress in SU01 transaction

Hello,
I need to know if there is a way to see the log changes in e-mail adress in transaction SU01.
Someone had change a SapUser e-mail adress in SU01.
I've look in Table ADR6 and ADR7, and it only has the actual e-mail.
I've also see transaction SUIM and there is notihng related with 'change e-mail adress'.
Can you please help me.
Thanks,
Best regards,
EF.

Try to check the change documents for current user in SUIM -->
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/90/c3e45b841f214ca32fcc17f7eb059e/frameset.htm
Regards.

SAP Technical Content - Transaction Logs are overflowing

Hi,
We activated the SAP TC on Friday and on Monday our transaction log was full.
In Transaction RSDDSTAT on the Query Tab we activated logging for every query but is this really the reason? There was almost no activity on the system during the weekend and this would be very odd.
I couldn't find any relationship between the TC and the transaction log but there must be something.
Thx for any hint

Hi Christian,
Did you check the active jobs in SM37?
Amine

Historical Logging Queue Overflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for