How to backup a Scale Out File Server

Can anyone explain to me how i am supposed to backup my Scale Out File Server? It is used to host our VDI environment but we have thrown a few other minimal shares on there for stuff relevant to the VDI setup. Profile Disk/Scripts etc
Per this topic http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/15561919-963b-4164-a307-e3696f5d21e1/adding-scaleout-file-servers-to-dpm2012-sp1?forum=dpmfilebackup
"DPM does not support protecting scale-out file servers (SOFS) for file shares.
I do not really know how to proceed. To make sure everything is backed up.

Hi,
Scale out file server support in DPM is for VM's (and SQL DB's I think), only and to be honest because of the metadata overhead using scale out file server and CSV as a general file server is not a good choice.  To protect VM's running on a scale out
file server the VM's are backed up from the Hyper-V hosts but the Scale Out file servers do require a DPM agent on them.  SMB 3.0 has a new feature which enables Remote VSS therefore the volumes (shares) are snapped from the Hyper-V hosts.
This document will give you the basic steps (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh757866.aspx)
hope this helps,
Regards,
Paul

Similar Messages

  • How to size a Scale-out File Server

    Hi,
    We are looking to implement a 2-node 2012 R2 Scale-out File Server cluster (using SAS JBOD enclosure) for the primary purpose of storing the VHD files that will be accessed by a 4-node 2012 R2 Hyper-V cluster using 10 gigabit Ethernet (no RDMA).  Our
    environment can be characterised as having a large number of mostly idle VMs that experience sporadic, low intensity use (this is *not* a VDI environment).  We have 2 questions.
    1) To what extent is RAM a consideration for the SoFS servers?  We can't find any documentation to suggest that there are benefits to be gained by having more RAM in the SoFS servers but we don't know if we should go with 8/16/32/64+ GB RAM in each
    of the nodes.
    2) With the need to keep costs down, we don't think RDMA / SMB-Direct NICs are going to be within our reach.  Should we however look to have 2 * dual-port 10 Gbps NICs in both the SoFS & Hyper-V boxes?

    Unless your VMs are read-intensive and you're going to deploy a CSV cache memory requirement for serving mostly idle VMs can be pretty low. However RAM is cheap these days so going for less then 16GB per node does not sound reasonable. Good sample, see:
    Windows Server 2012 File Server Tip: Enable CSV Caching on Scale-Out File Server Clusters
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/josebda/archive/2012/11/14/windows-server-2012-file-server-tip-enable-csv-caching-on-scale-out-file-server-clusters.aspx
    How to Enable
    CSV Cache
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/clustering/archive/2013/07/19/10286676.aspx
    HYPER-V OVER SMB: SCALE-OUT FILE SERVER AND STORAGE SPACES
    http://www.thomasmaurer.ch/2013/08/hyper-v-over-smb-scale-out-file-server-and-storage-spaces/
    Hope this helped :)
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

  • Scale out file server client access point using public nic

    Thoughts on this one.
    I have a Scale Out File Server cluster with a Client Access Point. Whenever i talk to the Client Access Point it uses the public nics.
    If i talk to the Scale Out File Server directly it uses the private like i want it to. How can i get the Client Access Point using the private nics?

    Hi JustusIV,
    Could you tell us why you want to modify the CAP use the “private” network, the CAP is used for client access, your clients may can’t access your cluster if modify your CAP
    use private network, if you want know how to modify the CAP of a cluster you can refer the following KB:
    Modify Network Settings for a Failover Cluster
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc725775.aspx
    More information:
    Understanding Access Points (Names and IP Addresses) in a Failover Cluster
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732536.aspx
    Windows Server 2008 Failover Clusters: Networking (Part 4)
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2010/04/15/windows-server-2008-failover-clusters-networking-part-4.aspx
    Hope this helps.
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Scale Out File Server for Applications using Shared VHDX

    Just trying to get a definitive answer to the question of can we use a Shared VHDX in a SOFS Cluster which will be used to store VHDX files?
    We have a 2012 R2 RDS Solution and store the User Profile Disks (UPD) on a SOFS Cluster that uses "traditional" storage from a SAN. We are planning on creating a new SOFS Cluster and wondered if we can use a shared VHDX instead of CSV as the storage
    that will then be used to store the UPDs (one VHDX file per user).
    Cheers for now
    Russell

    Just trying to get a definitive answer to the question of can we use a Shared VHDX in a SOFS Cluster which will be used to store VHDX files?
    We have a 2012 R2 RDS Solution and store the User Profile Disks (UPD) on a SOFS Cluster that uses "traditional" storage from a SAN. We are planning on creating a new SOFS Cluster and wondered if we can use a shared VHDX instead of CSV as the storage that
    will then be used to store the UPDs (one VHDX file per user).
    Cheers for now
    Russell
    Sure you can do it. See:
    Deploy a Guest Cluster Using a Shared Virtual Hard Disk
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn265980.aspx
    Scenario 2: Hyper-V failover cluster using file-based storage in a separate Scale-Out File Server
    This scenario uses Server Message Block (SMB) file-based storage as the location of the shared .vhdx files. You must deploy a Scale-Out File Server and create an SMB file share as the storage location. You also need a separate Hyper-V failover cluster.
    The following table describes the physical host prerequisites.
    Cluster Type
    Requirements
    Scale-Out File Server
    At least two servers that are running Windows Server 2012 R2.
    The servers must be members of the same Active Directory domain.
    The servers must meet the requirements for failover clustering.
    For more information, see Failover Clustering Hardware Requirements and Storage Options and Validate
    Hardware for a Failover Cluster.
    The servers must have access to block-level storage, which you can add as shared storage to the physical cluster. This storage can be iSCSI, Fibre Channel, SAS, or clustered storage spaces that use a set of shared SAS JBOD enclosures.
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

  • Windows Server 2012 R2 Scale out file server cluster using server disks as CSV

    Hi,
    My question is if I can create a Scale Out File Server Cluster with CSV using the disks that comes with the servers, we have 2 servers with 2 arrays each one, 1 array for the OS files and 1 array that we could use for the CSV.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    a SoFS needs some kind of shared Storage, this could be in the old days ISCSI or FC SAN and now also a Shared SAS JBOD with Clustered Storage Spaces.
    If you have 2  Servers with "local" Disks you need some sort of Software to create a Shared Disk Layer out of that local Disks, like Starwind or DataCore.
    Scale-Out File Server for Application Data Overview
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831349.aspx
    check out Step 1: Plan for Storage in Scale-Out File Server
    oh i forgot the normal 4th Option, some Kind of Clustered Raid Controller like HP or Dell offer in some Solutions.
    Udo
    Udo, clustered RAID controllers still require SAS disks mounted into external enclosure *OR* everything mounted into single chassis for Cluster-In-A-Box scenario (but that's for OEMs). The only two benefits somebody would have with them are a) ability to
    privide RAID LUs to Clustered Storage Spaces (non-clustered RAID controllers would be used as a SAS controllers only in pass-thru mode) and b) abillity to have caches synchronized so VM moved from one physical host to another would not start from the "cold"
    state. Please see LSI Syncro reference manual for details:
    Syncro 8i
    http://www.lsi.com/downloads/Public/Syncro%20Shared%20Storage/docs/LSI_PB_SyncroCS_9271-8i.pdf
    "LSI Syncro CS solutions are designed to provide continuous application uptime at a fraction 
    of the cost and complexity of traditional high availability solutions. Built on LSI MegaRAID 
    technology, the Syncro CS 9271-8i enables OEMs and system builders to use Syncro CS 
    controllers to build cost-effective two-node Cluster-in-a-Box (CiB) systems and deliver high 
    availability in a single self-contained unit.
    Syncro 8e
    http://www.lsi.com/downloads/Public/Syncro%20Shared%20Storage/docs/LSI_PB_SyncroCS_9286-8e.pdf
    LSI Syncro CS solutions are designed to provide continuous application uptime at a fraction
    of the cost and complexity of traditional high availability solutions. Built on LSI MegaRAID
    technology, the Syncro CS 9286-8e solution allows a system administrator to build a costeffective,
    easy to deploy and manage server failover cluster using volume servers and an offthe-
    shelf JBOD. Syncro CS solutions bring shared storage and storage controller failover into
    DAS environments, leveraging the low cost DAS infrastructure, simplicity, and performance
    benefits. Controller to controller connectivity is provided through the high performance SAS
    interface, providing the ability for resource load balancing, helping to ensure that applications
    are using the most responsive server to boost performance and help prevent any one server
    from being overburdened.
    So... Making long story short: 8i is for OEMs and 8e is for end-users but require a JBOD.
    Hope this helped :)
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

  • Scale out SSAS server for better performance

    HI
    i have a sharepoint farm
    running performance point service in a server where ANaylysis srver,reporting server installed
    and we have anyalysis server dbs and cubes
    and a wfe server where secure store service running
    we have
    1) application server + domain controller
    2) two wfes
    1) sql server sharepoint
    1) SSAS server ( analysis server dbs+ reporting server)
    here how i scaled out my SSAS server for better performance 
    adil

    Just trying to get a definitive answer to the question of can we use a Shared VHDX in a SOFS Cluster which will be used to store VHDX files?
    We have a 2012 R2 RDS Solution and store the User Profile Disks (UPD) on a SOFS Cluster that uses "traditional" storage from a SAN. We are planning on creating a new SOFS Cluster and wondered if we can use a shared VHDX instead of CSV as the storage that
    will then be used to store the UPDs (one VHDX file per user).
    Cheers for now
    Russell
    Sure you can do it. See:
    Deploy a Guest Cluster Using a Shared Virtual Hard Disk
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn265980.aspx
    Scenario 2: Hyper-V failover cluster using file-based storage in a separate Scale-Out File Server
    This scenario uses Server Message Block (SMB) file-based storage as the location of the shared .vhdx files. You must deploy a Scale-Out File Server and create an SMB file share as the storage location. You also need a separate Hyper-V failover cluster.
    The following table describes the physical host prerequisites.
    Cluster Type
    Requirements
    Scale-Out File Server
    At least two servers that are running Windows Server 2012 R2.
    The servers must be members of the same Active Directory domain.
    The servers must meet the requirements for failover clustering.
    For more information, see Failover Clustering Hardware Requirements and Storage Options and Validate
    Hardware for a Failover Cluster.
    The servers must have access to block-level storage, which you can add as shared storage to the physical cluster. This storage can be iSCSI, Fibre Channel, SAS, or clustered storage spaces that use a set of shared SAS JBOD enclosures.
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

  • How to backup only users' relevant files from File History on Windows 8.1?

    Hi,
    I would like to find out how to backup certain user's files from File History on Windows 8.1?
    I'm planning to store the backup files on our server, over a shared network, so that client can retrieve them whenever they need.
    I manage to do one by excluding all the folders from c:\, but it occurs quite silly to me to go select one by one files to exclude them.
    Please advise if there is a better way?

    Hi,
    This IT Professional forum is for general questions, feedback, or anything else related to Office 2010, since your question is more related to Windows client, I'd recommend you post a new question in the following forum for further assistance:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/home?category=w7itpro%2Cw8itpro%2Cwindowsvistaitpro%2Cwindowsxpitpro%2Cwindowsintune
    The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most
    qualified pool
    of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us. Thank you for your understanding.
    Steve Fan
    TechNet Community Support
    It's recommended to download and install
    Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office
    programs.

  • Backup not working for File Server

    We have System Center 2012 Sp1 installed with Agent Version : 4.1.3453.0
    We are protecting File Server which is member in DFS. We have Volume of More than 2TB and which is spanned accross multiple VHDs.
    I am facing problem with Backup not working and DPMRA service is getting stopped unexpectedly. When i try to create recovery point manually i don't get option to syncrhonize the changes. 1st and 3rd option is geryed out.
    I am getting Error on DPM as Affected area:    E:\
    Description:    The replica of Volume E:\ on<ServerName> is inconsistent with the protected data source. All protection activities for data source will fail until the replica is synchronized with consistency check. You can recover data
    from existing recovery points, but new recovery points cannot be created until the replica is consistent.
    For SharePoint farm, recovery points will continue getting created with the databases that are consistent. To backup inconsistent databases, run a consistency check on the farm. (ID 3106)
        DPM failed to communicate with the protection agent on <Server> because the agent is not responding. (ID 43 Details: Internal error code: 0x8099090E)
        More information
    Recommended action:    1) Check recent records from the DPMRA source in the Application Event Log on FUSE.win2k.internal to find out why the agent failed to respond.
    2) Make sure that the DPM server is remotely accessible from <Server>
    3) If a firewall is enabled on the DPM server, make sure that it is not blocking requests from <Server>
    4) Restart the DPM Protection Agent service on <Server>. If the service fails to start, re-install the protection agent.
        Synchronize with consistency check.
        Run a synchronization job with consistency check...
    Resolution:    To dismiss the alert, click below
        Inactivate
    I have Re-installed Agent but it is not helping.
    I have Other Volume labeled as F: and sized at 600 GB. Backup of that Volume is working fine for Same server.
    Please Suggest how to troubleshoot.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Swapnil
    Thanks, Swapnil Prajapati

    HI Chris,
    Sharing files using Bluetooth
    To share files using Bluetooth, you first need to make sure Bluetooth is turned on, and then use Bluetooth File Exchange to send a file.
    To turn on Bluetooth:
    Choose Apple menu > System Preferences and click Bluetooth.
    Select the On checkbox. To allow other Bluetooth enabled devices to “discover” your computer and send files, also select the Discoverable checkbox.
    Select “Show Bluetooth status in the menu bar” so you can quickly send files and perform other actions using the Bluetooth status menu in the menu bar.
    To send files using Bluetooth:
    Choose Send File from the Bluetooth status menu in the menu bar.
    If the Bluetooth menu isn’t visible, choose Apple menu > System Preferences, click Bluetooth, and select “Show Bluetooth status in the menu bar.”
    In the window that appears, select the file you want to send and click Send.
    Select the device you want to send the file to and click Send.
    If you don’t see the device you want to send the file to, make sure the device has Bluetooth turned on and is discoverable.
    You do not need File Sharing turned on for Bluetooth technology.
    Another way to share files between two Macs is How to use Firewire Target Disk Mode
    Carolyn

  • Scale out sharepoint server search to index server and Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application to new server

    Hi
    in my single server these below service are running:
    SharePoint Server Search 
    User Profile Service 
    Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application
    here how i scale out  Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application  to another server
    and  SharePoint Server Search  to new index server.
    adil

    Check here to see how to add servers to the farm:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc261752(v=office.15).aspx
    What Inderjeet meant was that if you chose to install SharePoint as a single server instead of a complete farm, you won't be able to add servers to the farm at a later time. You can check if this is the case by checking the registry key he mentioned. If
    that is indeed the case, there's nothing to it but reinstall the farm.
    So that is why you never should choose the single server option, it locks you in and limits future options, while choosing to install sharepoint as a complete farm it's still perfectly acceptable to host it on a single server.
    Kind regards,
    Margriet Bruggeman
    Lois & Clark IT Services
    web site: http://www.loisandclark.eu
    blog: http://www.sharepointdragons.com

  • How to backup VM in HyperV (Windows Server 2008 R2)

    Hello,
    Beginner's question: How to backup my VMs on an external
    USB disk?
    NB: I'm running Windows Server 2008 R2. It's a test machine, don't care with downtime. I want to backup only the VM (VHD files and VM configuration, not the whole server)
    Thanks

    Hello,
    for Hyper-V usage please ask the experts in
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home?forum=winserverhyperv
    Also see
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd405549(v=vs.85).aspx
    Best regards
    Meinolf Weber
    MVP, MCP, MCTS
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
    Twitter:  

  • How to convert concurrent program out files .out file to .txt files in

    Hi
    Trying to know if there is a way to convert the concurrent programs' output files witn '.out' extension to files with extension '.txt'
    thanks
    kp

    Why you want to change the file extension to txt instead of out?
    I believe you cannot do and you are not supposed to change it. Controlling the report output to different types can be done as explained in these docs.
    How to Setup The Report Output to Different Viewer Types in Oracle Applications 11i [ID 184375.1]
    How to Control the Name and the Application that Opens the Concurrent Request Output File on the Client? [ID 316752.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • How to backup/restore credentials in sql server 2012

    Hi, Can any one direct how to restore credentials using T-sql or GUI on SQL Server 2012.
    As per BOL, we know how to create credentials. 
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189522.
    But looking for taking backup/restore credentials sql serve 2012.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I highly recommend to go from step 1 to the end in this tutorial, but if you realy want to just only to restore than you can start in Lesson 4: Perform a Restore From a Full Database Backup
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj852091(v=sql.110).aspx
      Ronen Ariely
     [Personal Site]    [Blog]    [Facebook]

  • How To Backup DB Directly To Another Server?

    Hi,guyes,
    I have 2 Servers, Suppose one is named svr1,another is svr2, my db(Ora9.2) is in svr1, but I want to directly backup my db into svr2's disk using rman, so how do I do it? it is possible? pls help me thanks a lot!

    What are your OS versions ?. For example if you are in windows you could map a folder from one OS being that storage of another server.
    Joel Pérez
    http://otn.oracle.com/experts

  • How do I truly wipe out files from my Mac?

    I have a ton of music and videos on itunes. I often right click on the file and select move to trash. Is this all I have to do to truly clear out the file from my computer? Or do I need to go into the finder and manually grab the file and toss it in the trash?
    Thanks!
    Jay.

    "move to trash" really does move the file to the trash. once you empty the trash, the file is gone.

  • Restoring new DB to SMB3 Scale Out Server Disk takes forever to initialize

    We have a SQL Server 2014 DB installed on a VM running 2012 R2 Standard with Datacenter 2012 R2 as the host. We have a Scale Out File Server (SOFS) running 2012 R2 on two nodes clustered (CSV).  The entire network is 10GB.  SQL server is configured
    to use the SOFS cluster for it's databases files (using SMB3 as a network share).  When restoring a backup to the server as a new database restore, the process takes about an hour (it's a big DB 210GB).  When restoring the backup over the top
    of the existing database (nearly similar file/DB sizes), the restore takes 10 minutes.  I have read about "Instant File Initialization" but that appears to only apply to directly attached disks where the OS can block allocate the data using
    some "Volume Maintenance" permissions.   The network traffic during the "initialization phase" seems to be floating about 700mbs, yet when the actual restore counter starts (reading the backup file and writing the data) the network
    activity steps up to 6.5Gbs - sometimes higher - the count down appears to take 10 minutes either way.  So I'm quite sure that the 50 minutes is attributable to the initialization phase.   Which seems horribly excessive.
    Has anyone had similar experience using this kind of configuration? 

    For these databases, we use the simple recovery model.  So the log file is not very large (5GB compared to the 200GB of the data file).
    It appears that it is spending it's time zeroing the MDF file:
    11/3/2014 5:38
    spid55
    Unknown
    SetTargetRestoreAge: 0
    11/3/2014 5:38
    spid55
    Unknown
    Restore: LogZero complete
    11/3/2014 5:38
    spid55
    Unknown
    Restore: Waiting for log zero on FOO_TEST
    11/3/2014 5:28
    spid55
    Unknown
    Restore: Transferring data to FOO_TEST
    11/3/2014 5:28
    spid55
    Unknown
    Restore: Restoring backup set
    11/3/2014 5:28
    spid55
    Unknown
    Restore: Containers are ready
    11/3/2014 5:28
    spid55
    Unknown
    Zeroing completed on \\SOFSC\Shares\DB\FOO-DBD1\FOO_TEST.mdf
    11/3/2014 4:31
    spid55
    Unknown
    Zeroing completed on \\SOFSC\Shares\DB\FOO-DBD1\FOO_TEST_log.ldf
    11/3/2014 4:30
    spid55
    Unknown
    Zeroing \\SOFSC\Shares\DB\FOO-DBD1\FOO_TEST.mdf from page 1 to 26289280 (0x2000 to 0x3224900000)
    11/3/2014 4:30
    spid55
    Unknown
    Zeroing \\SOFSC\Shares\DB\FOO-DBD1\FOO_TEST_log.ldf from page 1 to 714448 (0x2000 to 0x15cda0000)
    11/3/2014 4:30
    spid55
    Unknown
    Restore: PreparingContainers
    So it looks like the "Instant File Initialization" settings do not apply to shared disk resources?

Maybe you are looking for