How to include a condition value in Tax Base Value BASB

Hi friends,
I have created a separate pricing procedure as per the price of a vendor which charges as follows.
A. Gross price Rs.100
B. Discount
C. Sub Total: A-B
D. Depo Charges % on C
E. Sub Total(C+D)
F. Entry Tax % on E
F. Sub Total (E+F)
G.NAVS on F
H. Sub Total (F+G)
For Depo Charges & Entry Tax I created new conditions ZDC1 & ZENT
Both the conditions are defined as
Condition Class A (Discount/Surcharge)
Calculation type A (Percentage)
Both are marked as item conditions without accrual tick.
Than I put them in a new calculation schema as follows .But the problem is NAVS, which is getting calculated on Sub Total u201CEu201D, i.e., without taking the Entry Tax value in to Sales Tax Base Value (BASB).
This is to indicate that our Tax procedure is TAXINJ and it is without any excise conditions.
The structure of the calculation schema is like this.
Step     Cntr     CTyp     Description     From     To
001     01     PB00     Gross Price     000     000
001     02     PBXX     Gross Price     000     000
010     01     RA00     Discount % on Net     000     000
010     02     RA01     Discount % on Gross     001     000
020     00          NetValueincldiscount     000     000
030     01     ZDC1     Depo Charges (%)     020     000
035     00          Sub Total          020           030
040     01     ZENT     Entry Tax %      035     000
060     00          Sub Total                     035     040
070     00     NAVS     Non-Deductible Tax     000     000
071     00          Sub Total                     060     070
Than other conditiontypes..........
What else am I missing for getting the right calculation?
Dhruba

Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba

Similar Messages

Rebate agreement - cond. base value and scale base value

Hi,
Good day!
I just like to ask the possible reason for the <b>cond. base value</b> and <b>scale base value</b> in rebate agreement (path: rebate payments -> verification level) to contain zero values only.
thanks,
nerissa

*

Value-added tax problem about free goods!

Hi All,
I've got a value-added tax problem.....
Can anyone can come out with a solution.
Here is the Business Scenario....
One product company offen give some free goods to its customer company for test or probation. In pricing, the free goods have no income so that the value-added tax is zero, but by the law, the product company must pay the VAT(value-added tax) base on the cost of the free goods.
How to implement this in SD R/3 Scenario...
Can any one of you suggest me a solution for this plz..
Regards,
wang-yuzhen.

Hi,
You need to bring in a consition type "VPRS" in your pricing procedure. The VAT will be determined based on this condition type. VPRS is a statistical condition type. That means eventhough it appears with a value it will potentially not be displayed in your invoice. The invoice value will be 0 and there will be no account posting for this condition type

Wrong condition base value when an order is copied from another order

I am copying sale order to sale order and encounter an issue with pricing .
I have an excise condtion for which the condition basis is the price condition . I copy the order and update the pricing in the new document ( I have to do this because the pricing type in copy controls is A ) . The price is being copied and the value calcualated as per the order quantity . But the same value is not flowing as the condition base value for the excise condition type mentioned above. It is taking some different value as the base value . There is no alt base value assigned in the procedure.
As per the settings in the procedure , the condtion value of the price should be the base value for the excise condition type and this is not happening
Could somebody throw light as to what is going wrong ?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Mahesh

Many thanks for this.
I can see entirely why it's designed as such, but I just find it slightly frustrating that there's no way to break the link between the order and the shipment out to the depot. Just to clarify, we're not requiring the orders to change - they will still be made and will come in - but just that the orders themselves don't specifically need to be the stock that is used for the replenishment.
So -
1. Min Max identifies depot needs replenishing.
2. Central distribution does not have (enough) stock to replenish.
3. Order is made to replenish central distributions stock.
4. We ship whatever we've got, when we've got it, to depot to replenish.
It's the bit where Min-Max is trying to replensih a specific depot rather than our central distribution centre that's my problem.
I suspect that, as you say, that specific issue is not directly fixable without getting our IT contractors to do a customisation.
I'm going to look into your Supply Date Offset suggestion now, though I'm not sure how this affects the shipping after the orders are placed. The orders themselves are approved manually after we've checked our stock position (i.e. what's in with the recycling team), but we recycle & refurb probably 60% of our maint stock so there'll always be kit turning up after the order has been made because of the long lead times.
Thanks again.

Base Value minus taxes

Dear All
I calculate a amount e.g base value - taxes
base value of a condition 70
taxe 5
Base value - taxes 70-5 =65
where i found that taxes are adding in base value instead substracting
i want to use any general way instead of Altranative Calculation type

Dear Shambhu
Go to V/06, select your tax condition type and execute. There on top right see what value you have maintained for the field Pos./Neg. It should have been minus.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Clarification on tax base amount

Hello SAP Gurus
I need some clarification on tax base amount.
when we make PO, there is a base amount of material and has excise conditions. now when we do MIGO with capture & post excise, one excise tab comes in item details, which shows all the duty values and tax base amount.
is this base amount & duties in MIGO are coming from PO?
if i change tax base amount and duties values in MIGO, what will be the impact?
if i change only duty values not tax base amount in MIGO, what will be the impact?
when we do MIRO, system proposes amount from PO, when we simulate, from where the excise duty values are flowing from PO or MIGO?
in MIRO screen, does system calculate the duties based on the amount coming in MIRO or it picks data from MIGO?
i need above clarification because i am not able to post vendor invoices during MIRO, system shows "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base". this is happening, when we are posting over value vendor invoices.
during MIGO, in some case duty values have been changed keeping tax base amount as per PO, in some case tax base amount and duty values both have been changed based on vendor invoice. pl help.
thanks & regards'

Hi
I have already done that in VKOA, accounting document showing tax code, tax amount, GL account except Base amount.
Best Regards
Swami

Excise Base Value & Basic Excise Rate(16%) is notpicked in RG1

Dear All,
During Excise invoice generation the value of Excise Base Value & Basic Excise Rate is not picked from billing. subsequently when i take print of RG1 in Excel format, Excise Base Value & Basic Excise Rate is also not picked it display 0.
Plz give me solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Pankaj
Message was edited by:
Pankaj Mahajan

hi,
plz chek if they are apprearing in your comm. invoice, if yes then check if the excise rates are maintained for the customer, material and the plant. also check if excise registations are maintained againsf the plants and settings are defined for the same and excise grps. and excise defaults.are u getting some error/ warning messages too ?
saurabh
Message was edited by:
saurabh diwakar

Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                   Material          Outgoing Target val
Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020    MAT2               150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR
                        MAterial       Outgoing target val
Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020         MAT2              0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

Condition value of Tax gets wrongly added to Total value of Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this. When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header = 700.00 EUR
Material Outgoing Target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header = 550.00 EUR
MAterial Outgoing target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.

Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba

Tax code Value not flowing automatically in PO condition type

Hi ,
In purchase order Tax value (14.42%+VAT) is not automatically Copied in to the
JEXS condition type .(Taxes on PO). Please help me how to resolve this issue.
Regards
Uma

Hi,
Thanks for the immediate reply. We have changed the settings as per your reply. But still system is not taking the value. Please revert back with further more valued inputs.
Regards
Uma

How do I include pages conditionally

I have three incolude files in the mail JSP file. It's given one after another without any condition. How do I include them 'conditionally' -- include the one, which some validation fails. For example, if only shipping address validation fails, it should have only val_ship_addr.jsp included, not others.

i just wanna see clearly your situation.. what exactly you want to achieve? r u trying to have an error message on screen or something else? can u elaborate further ?
anyways, i have a simple example on how to include conditionally just to give u an idea..this might help you <i hope>:
so i hav a main screen named main.jsp .... on the left part of the screen list two links that corresponds to various screen . in short the right part of the screen is dynamic, depending on what the user clicks on the left part of screen.
suppose i have two menu's on the left screen named : My Profile and Change Password
/**** here is the main.jsp ********/
<html>
<head>
<script language="javascript">
function toggleScr(formobj){
document.formobj.submit();
</script>
</head>
<body>
<%@ include file="misc.html" %>
<table width="100%">
<tr>
<td width="200px">

<%@ include file="LeftPanel.jsp"%>
</td>
<td width="350px">

<%
if(request.getParameter("scr")!=null){
String screentype=request.getParameter("scr")
if(screentype.equalsIgnireCase("B")){
%>
<%@ include file="Myprofile.jsp"%>
<%
}else{
%>
<%@ include file="NewPassword.jsp"%>
<%
}else{
// show the default screen
%>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
/*** here is the LeftPanel.jsp ***/
<table>
<tr>
<td>
My Profile
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
New Password
</td>
</tr></table>
/*** here is the misc.html ****/
<FORM NAME="myfprofileform" method="post" action="main.jsp">
<INPUT TYPE="HIDDEN" NAME="scr" VALUE="A"/>
</FORM>
<FORM NAME="newpwdform" method="post" action="main.jsp">
<INPUT TYPE="HIDDEN" NAME="scr" VALUE="B"/>
</FORM>

How system picks value from Tax Code

Dear Experts,
I have one scenario,
In our pricing procedure there are tax condition types for which there are no condition records maintained. But the values are maintained in Tax Code.
My doubt is, do we have to add these tax condition types in pricing procedure as they are already in Tax Code ?? Because I observed few condition types are not there in pricing procedure but the same are in Tax Code.
Second, how the system comes to know that there is no condition record and the value is in Tax code. How does it determine and pick the value from Tax code.
Thanks in advance
Sagar

Sagar,
Let me try to clear your confusion :
For Total determination of pricing we have two things
Pricing Procedure and Tax Procedure.
Pricing Procedure tell system about the what and how the price to calculated for material in Sale Order.
In this pricing procedure the conditions JIN1 JIN2 etc ares pertaining to tax applicable on the Sale order Price.
These conditions display the tax.
Now the tax is calculated based on tax procedure.
And a Tax procedure acts as a master and there is one tax procedure for one country.
for that particular tax procedure there are tax codes defined.
These Tax codes allows the using the same tax procedure but changing value of various conditions and removing which we dont require.
Lets take an example : AS TAXINN is tax procedure for India. Based in this procedure many tax codes are defined for 12% vat, 6% vat , no vat etc.
So what kind of tax will be applicable on the Sale order is governed by tax code which is mentioned in customer master.
Based on this tax code taxes are calculated on Sales order net value and then the tax amount is displayed in pricing procedure
You assign the tax condition types to Pricing procedure so that it will display the taxes in the sales order.
I hope it will clear some of your doubts. Please let me know if you need further assistance.
Thanks,
Raja

How to Activate a Condition Type in the Tax OCde for A/P -- Very Urgent

Hi Peers
I'm creating a new Tax Code in T.Code FTXP, while creating, One Condition Type is Deactivated, say JM01, How to activate that condition Type. I know how to activate the Condition Type in A/R side but I want to know it in A/P side. Plz help. Its very urgent.
Regards
Rajaram

Hi Rajaram,
U pls Check ur configuration. First u check the calculation procedure (F.A- Tax on sales & purchase-Basic setting-Check calculation procedure _ Define procedure) In the procedure field u check JM01 is activated or deactivated otherwise u created in condition Type.
I think its usefull otherwise u let me know
Thanks
R.Manigandan

How to include NULL in multi value parameters

Good Morning,
I'm posting this question after i tried other links and was not successful. I'm using a report builder to create a report. SSRS2008R2.
I have a sql to get the data into the data set. Source is ORACLE DB. The query is pulling lastname,firstname,dob,joindt,divname. I created a parameter in the SQL :
WHERE DIVNAME IN (:divname).
I created another dataset (select distinct divname from table2) and selected the paramter properties to get the values from the second dataset and selected it to be multivalued. However the user wants to see the NULL's or BLANKS that are in the DIVNAME.
Can some one please tell me as how i can acheive this?
When i run the query in the sql plus i get (null) values as well, but when in the second dataset i run the query i just get the DISTINCT divnames and a "BLANK" field (in SSRS)
Thanks

Hi thinkingeye,
According to your description, you want to include the null values in your multiple values parameter. Right?
In Reporting Services, we can't allow both null values and multiple values in a parameter. In this scenario, since you have created a dataset for getting distinct divname, we suggest you try "select distinct isnull(divname,-1) from [table]" in this
dataset so that all the null values will return -1. Also using isnull() function to replace divname in other query. This might be the most effective work around.
Reference:
Null and Multi-value parameter possible
Include Null Value Multi-Value Parameter list
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

How to split a condition value across line items with varying percentages?

Hello, can anyone suggest how this can be resolved. This is the scenario.
My client wants to be able to determine pricing for a sales document with a wide range of conditions. One particular condition contributes to the total price of each sales item by determining a percentage of the total amount. The percentage used isn't a fixed percentage but it is determined as follows: Lets say I have 3 sales items in the document with prices 200, 300 and 500 respectively. The total amount for the condition (which is known) then has to be shared amongst these 3 items according to the price of each item. How can this be achieved? Any ideas?

You will have to define a Header Condition which will apply to all the Items.
Then, You will have to develop a Z- Requirement in T-Code - VOFM with help your ABAPer.
Then assign this Routine in Alternative formula for condition base value column in your Pricing Procedure.
The ABAP code in the Requirement will read the Basic Price of all the Items & then proportionately divide the value of said Condition line-item wise.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

How to include a condition value in Tax Base Value BASB

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for