Base Value minus taxes

Dear All
I calculate a amount e.g base value - taxes
base value of a condition 70
taxe 5
Base value - taxes 70-5 =65
where i found that taxes are adding in base value instead substracting
i want to use any general way instead of Altranative Calculation type

Dear Shambhu
Go to V/06, select your tax condition type and execute. There on top right see what value you have maintained for the field Pos./Neg. It should have been minus.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

Sub total column in MM pricing and Base value for tax

Hi,
In MM pricing in M/08 for the condition we can use subtotal filed for multiple conditions if we use same subtotal fileds the value of all condition will be added in the define subtotal filed, so this is only effect of subtotal or it has also some othere effect, second think which I want to know in PO after PBXX we have some custom condition for Surcharge % (Item) whatever % we maintain in this the tax amount is calculated on the addition of PBXX and Surcharge % (Item, this is oK as per our requirement, but in M/08 for Surcharge % (Item ) the subtotal field os blank, also in OBQ3 Fi pricing for the Condition BASB the column for Alternative formula for condition base value ALSO Condition formula for alternative calculation type are also blank then How system found the BASB value as the adition of PBXX and Surcharge %, what is nasic rule behind this for the BASB value calculation.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
Thakns for your reply, In our existing system, in tax procedure 362/363 is not maintain, so in case this is not maintain, which value is considered as the base price.
regards,
zafar

Base value in tax code

from where does the system pick the base value for condition type BSAB in tax code as we are not maintaining any condition records.

Hi,
Calculation procedures containing the necessary specifications for the calculation and posting of taxes on sales/purchases have already been defined in the standard SAP system for certain countries.
The calculation procedure determines for which amount the individual condition types are to be calculated. This can be the base amount (total of the expense items and the revenue items) or a subtotal. The entry in column FrmLvl, determines for which amount tax is calculated.
While configuring in calculation procedure v wil tel the system to calculate tax on base amount by giving the from level and to level so it will calculate from there directly depending on the levels v mention.

Calculation of CST on (Base Value+Service Tax )

Hi Gurus,
We are using tax procedure as TAXINN. Here our client want tax code for service and CST i.e. (Service Tax 10.3 + CST 5%.For this I have done the required configuration in FTXP but still there is a problem regarding calculation of CST.Client wants to calculate   CST 5 % on (Base + Service Tax Amount).
Base Price                               500
Service Tax (10.3 %)             51.5
Total                                        551.5
Cst (5%)                                 27.57
Total Price with Taxes           579.075
As of now what I have seen in system its calculate CST on base price not on total of (Base + Service Tax) on the basis of condition type JVCS.I have following queries on the same:
1.Whether the requirement of client is correct means as per law
2.And if it is correct than how can we configure in SAP in tax procedure
Kindly advice.
Regards,
Abhinav Sharma

HI,
There is no way you can have this done if you are going to book transaction directly in FI based on tax code...this can be done if you are going to post transaction through SD or MM then you can attach routine to calculation procedure if MM and pricing procedure if SD..
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Base value in excise tab for import PO

Dear all,
We have a import purchase scenario where in the base value while capturing the excise invoice in MIGO is incorrect.
The PO value is 5000 EUR (400000 INR) with PO ex.rate as 80. The CVD caluated in PO is 540 EUR (43200 INR) which 10% of (PO value + Basic customs duty). While posting invoice in MIRO the CVD value posted was 41040 INR.
While posting GR for that particular PO the CVD value appearing is correct as per invoice which is 41040 INR but the base value is 427,938.46 INR.
And if we check the CVD value with refernce to GR base value it is 9.5% instead of 10%.
Request to kindly to let us know is where exactly the system picks the value or how does the system calculates the base value.
Secondly if we change the base value the taxes also change since the % does not match.
Would be grateful if we get some suggestion on this.
thanks and regards,

Thank AP for the reply,
But incase of import purchase we maintain it in pricing procedure.
thanks and regards,

How to include a condition value in Tax Base Value BASB

Hi friends,
I have created a separate pricing procedure as per the price of a vendor which charges as follows.
A. Gross price Rs.100
B. Discount
C. Sub Total: A-B
D. Depo Charges % on C
E. Sub Total(C+D)
F. Entry Tax % on E
F. Sub Total (E+F)
G.NAVS on F
H. Sub Total (F+G)
For Depo Charges & Entry Tax I created new conditions ZDC1 & ZENT
Both the conditions are defined as
Condition Class A (Discount/Surcharge)
Calculation type A (Percentage)
Both are marked as item conditions without accrual tick.
Than I put them in a new calculation schema as follows .But the problem is NAVS, which is getting calculated on Sub Total u201CEu201D, i.e., without taking the Entry Tax value in to Sales Tax Base Value (BASB).
This is to indicate that our Tax procedure is TAXINJ and it is without any excise conditions.
The structure of the calculation schema is like this.
Step     Cntr     CTyp     Description     From     To
001     01     PB00     Gross Price     000     000
001     02     PBXX     Gross Price     000     000
010     01     RA00     Discount % on Net     000     000
010     02     RA01     Discount % on Gross     001     000
020     00          NetValueincldiscount     000     000
030     01     ZDC1     Depo Charges (%)     020     000
035     00          Sub Total          020           030
040     01     ZENT     Entry Tax %      035     000
060     00          Sub Total                     035     040
070     00     NAVS     Non-Deductible Tax     000     000
071     00          Sub Total                     060     070
Than other conditiontypes..........
What else am I missing for getting the right calculation?
Dhruba

Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba

Wrong tax condition base value

Hi,
We are getting wrong tax condition base value if an item having particular combination of inactive condition exclusion items-
we have x abd y condition types which are inactive.
if x is having 0.01 then system is considering y value for tax condition value(it should not because it is inactive). If conditions having other than 0.01(for x), we donot have any problem. (even 0 also we donot have any problem)
Any inputs
chidambaram

Hi
Just check , whether some routines are written against the condition types.
Though inactive , it is picking up the values ,it may be on some per requsite condition.
Regards
KRSNA

How base value update

hi everyone.
there is change in the tax procedure. see some vendor will give the discounts after basic+ excise duty. than discount than vat/ cst will come. how this should be configured in tax procedure.
i have changed in the pricing procedure. it is working but it is not reflecting to the base value of the tax procedure. what the settings i have to do..
Thanks and Regards
santosh kumar

Hi,
Take a copy of RA01 in M/06 as YA01(as Discount) and keep it as following;
Cond. class A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category Blank
And Plus/minus - A (Positive)
Use this in Pricing Procedure ( M/08 ) after Gross Price ad Discount conditions (before Subtotal) and assign Subtotal "6" against this condition type.
In OBQ3 - Tax Procedure, assign AltCBV 363 to CST/VAT Condition Type (JIP1/JIP5)
Now check the calculation will happen as following;
Gross Price = 10000 INR
Discount (as -ve/+ve) = 1000 INR
BED 14% = 1400 INR
ECS 2% = 28 INR
SECess 1% = 14 INR
CST 2% = 248.84 INR

Net tax base and gross tax base is not defined in FB70

Dear SAP Gurus,
I am booking the customer invoice directly through FB70. While booking the same I am using the tax code A0 (Zero Output Tax) Tax Code column as the account is mandatory for Ta Code. But when I post the transaction system gives the following error.
Net tax base and gross tax base is not defined
Message no. F5341
Diagnosis
For the company code, it was specified that the net value (amount minus cash discount) is the tax basis and the gross value (amount including taxes) is the cash discount base. This constellation is not supported by the system.
Procedure
Correct the configuration for the company code in question.
I also check the FXTP confiq the A0 tax code is assign company code & also define & assign in zero tax code.
Please give the solution ASAP.
Regards,
Sandeep

Hi,
Check OBY6 as suggested by Kalyan or use Tcode - OB69.
Regards,
Shridhar

Value-added tax problem about free goods!

Hi All,
I've got a value-added tax problem.....
Can anyone can come out with a solution.
Here is the Business Scenario....
One product company offen give some free goods to its customer company for test or probation. In pricing, the free goods have no income so that the value-added tax is zero, but by the law, the product company must pay the VAT(value-added tax) base on the cost of the free goods.
How to implement this in SD R/3 Scenario...
Can any one of you suggest me a solution for this plz..
Regards,
wang-yuzhen.

Hi,
You need to bring in a consition type "VPRS" in your pricing procedure. The VAT will be determined based on this condition type. VPRS is a statistical condition type. That means eventhough it appears with a value it will potentially not be displayed in your invoice. The invoice value will be 0 and there will be no account posting for this condition type

CIN: Alteration of base value for CST in TAXINN

Hi,
In our business process there is a requirement that CST should not be calculated only on Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) rather base value for CST should be Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) + 2 Additional Surcharges as mentioned below:
Basic Price     100.00
BED (10%)     10.00
Ecess (2%)     0.20
SEcess (1%) 0.10
Additional Surcharge1     4.00
Additional Surcharge2     6.00
Base for CST 120.30 (100100.20.14+6)
CST (2%)     2.41 (2% of 120.30)
Total Value     122.71
The tax procedure being used is TAXINN
Is there any standard routine or subtotal available so that by using this in PO Calculation Schema and TAXINN the base value of CST can be modified as desired?
Please provide some useful ideas.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Sapdear on Aug 29, 2011 8:22 AM

Hi,
The additional surcharges are condition types in the calculation schema of PO whereas CST is being calculated in Tax Procedure TAXINN so how "From" and "To" functionality can work. The surcharges are getting calculated in PO Pricing and CST in tax procedure TAXINN (both at different places)
We want to use a tax code (BED10%Ecess2%SEcess1%+CST2%) to calculate Excise Duties and CST by additional surcharges taking into account.
Can any one provide some idea to resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance

Excise base value is not changing in MIGO excise tab for Import PO scenari

Dear Gururs,
We are using MIGO to capture & Post Excise Invoice for our Import PO (PO type ZIMP). the problem is, when we change the qty in MIGO Qty tab, corresponding base value is not getting update in Excise tab. we are not creating the planned cost mIRO directly we do the GRN.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks
Shital

Hello Shital ,
You are using the India Scenario right?
The issue can be because you have not assigned a zero tax code to the line item. For India please make the tax code field in PO as mandatory so that the user does not save the PO without atleast a zero tax code.
Maintain the tax code & proceed. You will see the tab in MIGO.
Regards
Plauto

Creation of a new Formula Routine for condition base value calculation

hello people,
i am stuck up in a situation where SAP has itself said that nothing can be done.
but i know you all can guide me to some way or the other
see, the scenario is like this
1. i have to calculate the base value for a pricing condition.
which will follow the formula
net value + excise duty + freight
2. in standard routines two things are normally bieng used
xkwert for the value that has to be finally calculated(taking reference of routine 004)
komp-netwr for the net value
3. i have to calculate the excise duty by adding up all the base values of existing pricing conditions like JMOP, JEC1 etc that i have which i saw in internal table
XKOMV on debugging
4. now freight is to be calculated from all the values of condition types that are in KOMP which is a structure and no internal table is defined in standard main program
now ppl
can you guide me by looking at the standard program
what is this xkwert field and where it is assigning the value.
how to get field from other structure and table.
please guide as to how to approach the problem.
thanks and regards
Nitin

HI,
the scenario u r talking abt is condition based value formuls of VOFM transaction.
here the data is retrieved as 'X' structures and will hold normal tables with respective names. and in this case all the pricing data is in KOMV ie XKOMV
Final amount including tax
form frm_kond_basis_004.
xkwert = komp-netwr + komp-mwsbp.
endform.
always calulation is done in xkwert field and final value is stoerd in xkomv.
*.................. text ............................................. *
Condition base value formula to get the assessable value of the     *
saleable material from j_1iassval. If the value is not maintained   *
then the selling price will be taken as the base                    *
TABLES: J_1IASSVAL.
DATA XXKOMV LIKE KOMV .
XXKOMV = XKOMV.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM J_1IASSVAL WHERE J_1IWERKS = KOMP-WERKS AND
                                     J_1IMATNR = KOMP-MATNR.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
    IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP NE 0.
    XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
    ENDIF.
    IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS NE 0.
    XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
    ENDIF.
ELSE.
   XKWERT = XXKOMV-KAWRT .
ENDIF .
XKOMV = XXKOMV .
ENDFORM.
and as far as ur req select allthe condition type data and sum and take the average value and pass it.

In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO

Dear Experts ,
I have an query on the Excise Base value in Import PO .
The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial invoice , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
Regards,
DGN 21
Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM

>
dgn21 wrote:
> Dear Jeyakanthan,
>
> As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
> I have following condition in schema:
> Gross Price (A):
> Insurance %(B)
> Basic Landing Charges (C):
> Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
> Basic customs Duty (D)
> CVD (E)
> Ecess on CVD (F):
> S E Cess on CVD (G):
> And then other conditions
>
> Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
> Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ?

In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po

Hi,
We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
please suggest me the any config
Thanks
Shital

Hi,
i have test in SAP note u suggested
Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
but my scenario is different
Thanks
Shital

Base Value minus taxes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for