How to tune the query..."sum" operation is taking too much long time...

how to reduce the execution time for the below query..."sum" operation is taking too much long time....
SELECT
B.DP_AVPS_STATUS,
SUM(DP_AD_CURR_BAL*D.ISIN_CLOSE_PRICE) Qty,
B.DP_NET_WORTH,
B.CMN_DP_FLAG,
B.RESTRAIN_TYPE ,
B.LETT_GENR_DATE,
E.MAX_NET_WORTH,
E.MIN_NET_WORTH
FROM DPMADV0 A, PABRNCHDTLP0 B, PABANKCCYP0 D,PADPNETWORTHDTLP0 E,
(SELECT CID_NUMB FROM CFCUSTMASTD0
WHERE SUB_TYPE NOT IN (1,2,5,6,7,28,29,30,31,40,41,48,49,50,57,83)) C
WHERE A.DP_AD_BR_NBR = B.BRNCH_NUMB
AND A.DP_AD_CCY_CDE = D.CCY_ALPHA_CODE
AND A.DP_AD_ACCT_NBR = C.CID_NUMB
AND E.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE = B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE
AND SUBSTR(B.BRNCH_NUMB,1,3) like SUBSTR(:hvBrnchNumb,1,3)
AND ((B.DP_TYPE IN (2) AND B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE IN (10, 11)) or
(B.DP_TYPE IN (3) and B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE=11 ) )
AND B.DEL_FLAG = 'N'
AND B.DP_STATUS = 'A'
AND D.ISIN_STATUS = 'A'
GROUP BY B.DP_NET_WORTH,B.RESTRAIN_TYPE,B.DP_AVPS_STATUS,E.MAX_NET_WORTH,
E.MIN_NET_WORTH,B.CMN_DP_FLAG,B.LETT_GENR_DATE;

Hi,
please produce a plan with rowsource statistics (if not sure how, follow instructions in http://savvinov.com/2012/09/24/a-sqlplus-script-for-diagnosing-poor-sql-plans/) and post it using tags to preserve formatting.
Best regards,
Nikolay
P.S. I also suggest that you work on your open threads:
Handle:      946903
Status Level:      Newbie
Registered:      Jul 16, 2012
Total Posts:      11
Total Questions:      5 (5 unresolved)

Similar Messages

How to tune the query...?

Hi all,
I am having a table with millions of records and the query is taking hours
time. How to tune the query apart from doing the following things.
1. Creating or Deleting indexes.
2. Using Bind variables.
3. Using Hints.
4. Updating the Statitics regurarly.
Actually, i have asked this question in interview how to tune the query.
I told him the above 4 things. Then he told, these are not working, then
how you will tune this query.
Thanks in advance,
Pal

user546710 wrote:
Actually, i have asked this question in interview how to tune the query.
I told him the above 4 things. Then he told, these are not working, then
how you will tune this query.It actually depends on the scenario/problem given.
You may want to read this first.
When your query takes too long ...
When your query takes too long ...
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

How to uninstall Mcafee anti-virus from my machine because of machine bootup is taking too much of time for usage?

Hi,
How to uninstall Mcafee anti-virus from my machine because of machine bootup is taking too much of time for usage? so that i moved all mcafee related file to trash but while machine boot up mcafee showing and asking Authentication so any one give me better suggestion on this.
Thanks in advance,
Suresh Balakrishnan

Hi All,
i uninstalled AV successfully using as below mentioned links:
Moved to VirusScan Other where hopefully an expert can help you.
Until they do I Googled 'How to uninstall VirusScan 8.6 for MAC' and got this as one of the many choices: https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=KB54975
There are also uninstall instructions in the User Guide: https://kc.mcafee.com/resources/sites/MCAFEE/content/live/PRODUCT_DOCUMENTATION/ 22000/PD22134/en_US/VirusScan%20for%20Mac%208.6.1%20User%20Guide%20Addendum.pdf
By condemning files to the bin you may have scotched any automated method of removal but I will defer to the experts on that.
Thanks lot,
Suresh Balakrishann

So i have an apple ipod touch 1st generation and it is not charging! It shows the charging sign but its taking a really long time to charge. Ive had it charging for at least 3 hours and it still says under 20% so can someone help me figure this out??

So i have an apple ipod touch 1st generation and it is not charging! It shows the charging sign but its taking a really long time to charge. Ive had it charging for at least 3 hours and it still says under 20% so can someone help me figure this out??

Not Charge
- See:
iPod touch: Hardware troubleshooting
iPhone and iPod touch: Charging the battery
- Try another cable.
- Try another charging source
- Inspect the dock connector on the iPod for bent or missing contacts, foreign material, corroded contacts, broken, missing or cracked plastic.
- Make an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store.
Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar

How to tune the query for duplicate records while joining the two tables

hi,i am executing the query which has retrieving multiple tables,in which one of them has duplicate record,how to get single record

Not enough info...subject says "tune" the query, message says "write" the query...and where is actual query that you had tried ?

How to tune the query and difference between CBO AND RBO.. Which is good

Hello Friends,
Here are some questions I have pls reply back with complete description and url if any ..
1)How Did you tune Query,
2)What approach you take to tune query? Do you use Hints?
3)Where did you tune the query and what are the issue with query?
4)What is difference between RBO and CBO? where u use RBO and CBO.
5)Give some information about hash join?
6) Using explain plan how do u know where the bottle neck in query .. how u will identify where the bottle neck is from explain plan .
thanks/Kumar

Hi,
kumar73 wrote:
Hello Friends,
Here are some questions I have pls reply back with complete description and url if any ..
1)How Did you tune Query, Use EXPLAIN PLAN to see exactly where it is spending its time, and address those areas.
See the forum FAQ
SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
"3. How to improve the performance of my query?"
2)What approach you take to tune query? Do you use Hints?Hints can help.
Even more helpful is writing the SQL efficiently (avoiding multiple scans of the same table, filtering early, using built-in rather than user-defined functions, ...), creating and using indexes, and, for large tables, partitioning.
Table design can have a big impact on performace.
Look for ways to do part of what you need before the query. This includes denormalizing (when appropriate), the kind of pre-digesting that often takes place in data warehouses, function-based indexes, and, starting in Oracle 11, virtual columns.
3)Where did you tune the query and what are the issue with query?Either this question is a vague summary of the entire thread, or I don't understand it. Can you re-phrase this part?
4)What is difference between RBO and CBO? where u use RBO and CBO.Basically, use RBO if you have Oracle 7 or earlier.

How to Tune the Transactions/ Z - reports /Progr..of High response time

Dear friends,
in <b>ST03</b> work load anlysis menu.... there are some z-reports, transactions, and some programmes are noticed contineously that they are taking the <b>max. response time</b> (and mostly >90%of time is DB Time ).
how to tune the above situation ??
Thank u.

Siva,
You can start with some thing like:
ST04 -> Detail Analysis -> SQL Request (look at top disk reads and buffer get SQL statements)
For the top SQL statements identified you'd want to look at the explain plan to determine if the SQL statements is:
1) inefficient
2) are your DB stats up to date on the tables (note up to date stats does not always means they are the best)
3) if there are better indexes available, if not would a more suitable index help?
4) if there are many slow disk reads, is there an I/O issue?
etc...
While you're in ST04 make sure your buffers are sized adequately.
Also make sure your Oracle parameters are set according to this OSS note.
Note 830576 - Parameter recommendations for Oracle 10g

How to stop process chain, if it is taking too much time than expected.

Some times if a process chain takes to much time to finish than expected, how I can stop the process chain and execute it again.
Thanks in Advance.
Harman

how I can stop the process chain ??
If the job is running for a long time ,
1)GOTO RSMO and SM37 and check the long running job over there.
2)There you can see the status of the job.
3)If the job is still running you can kill that job
4)delete the failed request from data target.
for more details go to this below link
how to stop process chain if it yellow for long time
how I can execute it again ?
GOto Function module RSPC_API_CHAIN_START
and give u r process chain name there.and execute.

Some Basic steps How to tune this Query

Hi All
This is my cursor Query to fetch the Eligible orders its taking too much of time to execute, This is my query
SELECT oeol.header_id,oeol.attribute1,oeoh.order_number,COUNT(1) consignment_count
FROM oe_order_lines_all oeol,oe_order_headers_all oeoh,oe_transaction_types_all oett
WHERE oeol.header_id = oeoh.header_id
AND oeol.flow_status_code IN(DECODE(oett.name,xxhdnl_om_common_util_pkg.g_push_line_type,
DECODE(oeol.shipment_priority_code,'EXPRESS',DECODE(oeol.flow_status_code,'AWAITING_STOCK'
,'AWAITING_STOCK','STOCK_RECEIVED','STOCK_RECEIVED'),'STOCK_RECEIVED')
,DECODE(XXHDNL_OM_QUI_BAT_PLAN_EXT_PKG.check_push_or_pull(oeol.line_id),'PUSH','BOOKED')))
AND(oeol.shipment_priority_code=p_shipment_priority OR p_shipment_priority IS NULL)
AND oeol.line_type_id =oett.transaction_type_id AND oett.name IN
(xxhdnl_om_common_util_pkg.g_return_line_type
,xxhdnl_om_common_util_pkg.g_push_line_type )
AND oeoh.attribute3 IS NULL
GROUP BY
oeol.header_id
,oeol.attribute1
,oeoh.order_number;
Pls provide some basic steps for tuning regarding some performance.
thanks & regards
Srikkanth.M

Hi
as I tried to say is that DECODE is just hard to read, but not a performance issue.
What do you do in the XXHDNL_OM_QUI_BAT_PLAN_EXT_PKG.check_push_or_pull(oeol.line_id) procedure?
But let me try the DECODE... not 100% correct as I can't test but you'll get the picture:
SELECT
FROM
WHERE oeol.flow_status_code IN
CASE WHEN oett.name = xxhdnl_om_common_util_pkg.g_push_line_type THEN
   CASE WHEN oeol.shipment_priority_code = 'EXPRESS' THEN
      CASE WHEN oeol.flow_status_code ='AWAITING_STOCK' THEN 'AWAITING_STOCK'
           WHEN oeol.flow_status_code ='STOCK_RECEIVED' THEN 'STOCK_RECEIVED'
           ELSE null END
      ELSE
      CASE WHEN XXHDNL_OM_QUI_BAT_PLAN_EXT_PKG.check_push_or_pull(oeol.line_id) = 'PUSH' THEN 'BOOKED'
         ELSE NULL END
ELSE
NULL
ENDThat is a 1:1 "translation" PLEASE add comments in nested statements.
And this is easier to read, as in CASE you can use AND / OR / IN ....
SELECT
FROM
WHERE oeol.flow_status_code IN
CASE WHEN oett.name = xxhdnl_om_common_util_pkg.g_push_line_type THEN
   CASE WHEN oeol.shipment_priority_code = 'EXPRESS' AND oeol.flow_status_code IN ('AWAITING_STOCK','STOCK_RECEIVED')
     THEN oeol.flow_status_code ELSE NULL END
   ELSE
    CASE WHEN XXHDNL_OM_QUI_BAT_PLAN_EXT_PKG.check_push_or_pull(oeol.line_id) = 'PUSH' THEN 'BOOKED'
         ELSE NULL END
ENDThe "oeol.flow_status_code IN" makes no sense as the output of/DECODE/CASE is always 1 value right? And I would use the logic on a select on table "oe_order_lines_all" and then use the calculated field as a JOIN criteria. Much easier to test and read.
But, please check the procedure which you call that can be deadly! The "case" is just "nice to have"
-- andy

Why is query taking too much time ?

Hi gurus,
I have a table name test which has 100000 records in it,now the question i like to ask is.
when i query select * from test ; no proble with responce time, but when the next day i fire the above query it is taking too much of time say 3 times.i would also like to tell you that everything is ok in respect of tuning,the db is properly tuned, network is tuned properly. what could be the hurting factor here ??
take care
All expertise.

Here is a small test on my windows PC.
oracle 9i Rel1.
Table : emp_test
number of records : 42k
set autot trace exp stat
15:29:13 jaffar@PRIMEDB> select * from emp_test;
41665 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.06 ==> response time.
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP_TEST' (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2951 consistent gets
178 physical reads
0 redo size
1268062 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
31050 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2779 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
41665 rows processed
15:29:40 jaffar@PRIMEDB> delete from emp_test where deptno = 10;
24998 rows deleted.
Elapsed: 00:00:10.06
15:31:19 jaffar@PRIMEDB> select * from emp_test;
16667 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.09 ==> response time
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP_TEST' (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1289 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
218615 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
12724 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1113 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
16667 rows processed

How to tune this query for the improve performance ?

Hi All,
How to tune this query for the improve performance ?
select a.claim_number,a.pay_cd,a.claim_occurrence_number,
case
when sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd ='0'
then a.payment_est_amt
else 0
end
)=0
then 0
else (sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd='0'and a.payment_est_amt > 0
then a.payment_est_amt
else 0
end)
- sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd<>'0'
then a.payment_amt
else 0
end))
end as estimate
from ins_claim_payment a
where a.as_of_date between '31-jan-03' and '30-aug-06'
and ( a.data_source = '25' or (a.data_source between '27' and '29'))
and substr(a.pay_cd,1,1) IN ('2','3','4','8','9')
group by a.claim_number, a.pay_cd, a.claim_occurrence_number
Thank you,
Mcka

Mcka
As well as EXPLAIN PLAN, let us know what proportion of rows are visited by this query. It may be that it is not using a full table scan when it should (or vice versa).
And of course we'd need to know what indexes are available, and how selective they are for the predicated you have in this query ...
Regards Nigel

How to calculate the individual sums of multiple columns in a single query

Hello,
Using Oracle 11gR2 on windows 7 client. I have a question on calculating sum() on multiple columns on different columns and store the results in a view. Unfortunately I could not post the problem here as it keeps on giving error "Sorry, this content is not allowed", without telling where or what it is! So I had to post it in the stack-overflow forum, here is the link: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16529721/how-to-calculate-the-individual-sums-of-multiple-columns-in-a-single-query-ora
Will appreciate any help or suggestion.
Thanks

user13667036 wrote:
Hello,
Using Oracle 11gR2 on windows 7 client. I have a question on calculating sum() on multiple columns on different columns and store the results in a view. Unfortunately I could not post the problem here as it keeps on giving error "Sorry, this content is not allowed", without telling where or what it is! So I had to post it in the stack-overflow forum, here is the link: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16529721/how-to-calculate-the-individual-sums-of-multiple-columns-in-a-single-query-ora
Will appreciate any help or suggestion.
ThanksLooks like you want a simple group by.
select
          yr
     ,      mnth
     ,      region
     ,     sum(handled_package)
     ,     sum(expected_missing_package)
     ,     sum(actual_missing_package)
from test
group by
     yr, mnth, region
order by
     yr, mnth, region;I wouldn't recommend storing your data for year / month in 2 columns like that unless you have a really good reason. I would store it as a date column and add a check constraint to ensure that the date is always the first of the month, then format it out as you wish to the client.
CREATE TABLE test
     year_month                              date,
    Region                     VARCHAR2(50),
    CITY                       VARCHAR2(50),
    Handled_Package            NUMBER,
    Expected_Missing_Package   NUMBER,
    Actual_Missing_Package     NUMBER
alter table test add constraint firs_of_month check (year_month = trunc(year_month, 'mm'));
ME_XE?Insert into TEST (year_month, REGION, CITY, HANDLED_PACKAGE, EXPECTED_MISSING_PACKAGE, ACTUAL_MISSING_PACKAGE)
2 Values (to_date('2012-nov-12', 'yyyy-mon-dd'), 'Western', 'San Fransisco', 200, 10, 5);
Insert into TEST (year_month, REGION, CITY, HANDLED_PACKAGE, EXPECTED_MISSING_PACKAGE, ACTUAL_MISSING_PACKAGE)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02290: check constraint (TUBBY.FIRS_OF_MONTH) violated
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
ME_XE?Insert into TEST (year_month, REGION, CITY, HANDLED_PACKAGE, EXPECTED_MISSING_PACKAGE, ACTUAL_MISSING_PACKAGE)
2 Values (to_date('2012-nov-01', 'yyyy-mon-dd'), 'Western', 'San Fransisco', 200, 10, 5);
1 row created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
ME_XE?select
2        to_char(year_month, 'fmYYYY')    as year
3     , to_char(year_month, 'fmMonth')   as month
4     , Region
5     , CITY
6     , Handled_Package
7     , Expected_Missing_Package
8     , Actual_Missing_Package
9 from test;
YEAR         MONTH                REGION                         CITY                    HANDLED_PACKAGE EXPECTED_MISSING_PACKAGE ACTUAL_MISSING_PACKAGE
2012         November             Western                        San Fransisco                       200                       10                      5
1 row selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
ME_XE?Then you have nice a nice and easy validation that ensures you data integrity.
Cheers,

How to improve the query performance or tune query from Explain Plan

Hi
The following is my explain plan for sql query. (The plan is generated by Toad v9.7). How to fix the query?
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 4,160 Bytes: 25,296 Cardinality: 204
     8 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 3 Bytes: 54 Cardinality: 1
          5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2 Bytes: 23 Cardinality: 1
               2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
                    1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 1 Bytes: 10 Cardinality: 1
                    3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
          7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 1 Bytes: 31 Cardinality: 1
               6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
     10 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
          9 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
     15 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2 Bytes: 29 Cardinality: 1
          12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
               11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
          14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE ONT.OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 17 Cardinality: 1
               13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ONT.OE_ORDER_HEADERS_U2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
     21 FILTER
          16 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE ONT.OE_TRANSACTION_TYPES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 1,127 Cardinality: 49
          20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2 Bytes: 21 Cardinality: 1
               18 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
                    17 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               19 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) ONT.OE_ORDER_HEADERS_U2 Cost: 1 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
     23 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
          22 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
     45 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 4,160 Bytes: 25,296 Cardinality: 204
          42 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 4,150 Bytes: 23,052 Cardinality: 204
               38 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 4,140 Bytes: 19,992 Cardinality: 204
                    34 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 4,094 Bytes: 75,850 Cardinality: 925
                         30 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 3,909 Bytes: 210,843 Cardinality: 3,699
                              26 PARTITION LIST ALL Cost: 2,436 Bytes: 338,491 Cardinality: 14,717 Partition #: 29 Partitions accessed #1 - #18
                                   25 TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID TABLE XLA.XLA_AE_HEADERS Cost: 2,436 Bytes: 338,491 Cardinality: 14,717 Partition #: 29 Partitions accessed #1 - #18
                                        24 INDEX SKIP SCAN INDEX XLA.XLA_AE_HEADERS_N1 Cost: 264 Cardinality: 1,398,115 Partition #: 29 Partitions accessed #1 - #18
                              29 PARTITION LIST ITERATOR Cost: 1 Bytes: 34 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 32
                                   28 TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID TABLE XLA.XLA_AE_LINES Cost: 1 Bytes: 34 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 32
                                        27 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) XLA.XLA_AE_LINES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 32
                         33 PARTITION LIST ITERATOR Cost: 1 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 35
                              32 TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID TABLE XLA.XLA_DISTRIBUTION_LINKS Cost: 1 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 35
                                   31 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX XLA.XLA_DISTRIBUTION_LINKS_N3 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 35
                    37 PARTITION LIST SINGLE Cost: 1 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 38
                         36 TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID TABLE XLA.XLA_EVENTS Cost: 1 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 39 Partitions accessed #2
                              35 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) XLA.XLA_EVENTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 40 Partitions accessed #2
               41 PARTITION LIST SINGLE Cost: 1 Bytes: 15 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 41
                    40 TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID TABLE XLA.XLA_TRANSACTION_ENTITIES Cost: 1 Bytes: 15 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 42 Partitions accessed #2
                         39 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) XLA.XLA_TRANSACTION_ENTITIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 43 Partitions accessed #2
          44 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS Cost: 1 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
               43 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1

damorgan wrote:
Tuning is NOT about reducing the cost of i/o.
i/o is only one of many contributors to cost and only one of many contributors to waits.
Any time you would like to explore this further run this code:
SELECT 1 FROM dual
WHERE regexp_like(' ','^*[ ]*a');but not on a production box because you are going to experience an extreme tuning event with zero i/o.
And when I say "extreme" I mean "EXTREME!"
You've been warned.I think you just need a faster server.
SQL> set autotrace traceonly statistics
SQL> set timing on
SQL> select 1 from dual
2 where
3 regexp_like   (' ','^*[ ]*a');
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
          0 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
        243 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        349 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          0 rows processedRepeated from an Oracle 10.2.0.x instance:
SQL> SELECT DISTINCT SID FROM V$MYSTAT;
       SID
       310
SQL> ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10053 TRACE NAME CONTEXT FOREVER, LEVEL 1';
Session altered.
SQL> select 1 from dual
2 where
3 regexp_like   (' ','^*[ ]*a');The session is hung. Wait a little while and connect to the database using a different session:
COLUMN STAT_NAME FORMAT A35 TRU
SET PAGESIZE 200
SELECT
STAT_NAME,
VALUE
FROM
V$SESS_TIME_MODEL
WHERE
SID=310;
STAT_NAME                                VALUE
DB time                                   9247
DB CPU                                    9247
background elapsed time                      0
background cpu time                          0
sequence load elapsed time                   0
parse time elapsed                        6374
hard parse elapsed time                   5997
sql execute elapsed time                  2939
connection management call elapsed        1660
failed parse elapsed time                    0
failed parse (out of shared memory)          0
hard parse (sharing criteria) elaps          0
hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed           0
PL/SQL execution elapsed time               95
inbound PL/SQL rpc elapsed time              0
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time              0
Java execution elapsed time                  0
repeated bind elapsed time                  48
RMAN cpu time (backup/restore)               0Seems to be using a bit of time for the hard parse (hard parse elapsed time). Wait a little while, then re-execute the query:
STAT_NAME                                VALUE
DB time                                   9247
DB CPU                                    9247
background elapsed time                      0
background cpu time                          0
sequence load elapsed time                   0
parse time elapsed                        6374
hard parse elapsed time                   5997
sql execute elapsed time                  2939
connection management call elapsed        1660
failed parse elapsed time                    0
failed parse (out of shared memory)          0
hard parse (sharing criteria) elaps          0
hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed           0
PL/SQL execution elapsed time               95
inbound PL/SQL rpc elapsed time              0
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time              0
Java execution elapsed time                  0
repeated bind elapsed time                  48
RMAN cpu time (backup/restore)               0The session is not reporting additional CPU usage or parse time.
Let's check one of the session's statistics:
SELECT
SS.VALUE
FROM
V$SESSTAT SS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME='consistent gets'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=SS.STATISTIC#
AND SS.SID=310;
     VALUE
       163Not many consistent gets after 20+ minutes.
Let's take a look at the plan:
SQL> SELECT SQL_ID,CHILD_NUMBER FROM V$SQL WHERE SQL_TEXT LIKE 'select 1 from du
al%';
SQL_ID        CHILD_NUMBER
04mpgrzhsv72w            0
SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR('04mpgrzhsv72w',0,'TYPICAL'))
select 1 from dual where regexp_like   (' ','^*[ ]*a')
NOTE: cannot fetch plan for SQL_ID: 04mpgrzhsv72w, CHILD_NUMBER: 0
      Please verify value of SQL_ID and CHILD_NUMBER;
      It could also be that the plan is no longer in cursor cache (check v$sql_p
lan)No plan...
Let's take a look at the 10053 trace file:
Registered qb: SEL$1 0x19157f38 (PARSER)
signature (): qb_name=SEL$1 nbfros=1 flg=0
    fro(0): flg=4 objn=258 hint_alias="DUAL"@"SEL$1"
Predicate Move-Around (PM)
PM: Considering predicate move-around in SEL$1 (#0).
PM:   Checking validity of predicate move-around in SEL$1 (#0).
CBQT: Validity checks failed for 7uqx4guu04x3g.
CVM: Considering view merge in query block SEL$1 (#0)
CBQT: Validity checks failed for 7uqx4guu04x3g.
Subquery Unnest
SU: Considering subquery unnesting in query block SEL$1 (#0)
Set-Join Conversion (SJC)
SJC: Considering set-join conversion in SEL$1 (#0).
Predicate Move-Around (PM)
PM: Considering predicate move-around in SEL$1 (#0).
PM:   Checking validity of predicate move-around in SEL$1 (#0).
PM:     PM bypassed: Outer query contains no views.
FPD: Considering simple filter push in SEL$1 (#0)
FPD:   Current where clause predicates in SEL$1 (#0) :
          REGEXP_LIKE (' ','^*[ ]*a')
kkogcp: try to generate transitive predicate from check constraints for SEL$1 (#0)
predicates with check contraints: REGEXP_LIKE (' ','^*[ ]*a')
after transitive predicate generation: REGEXP_LIKE (' ','^*[ ]*a')
finally: REGEXP_LIKE (' ','^*[ ]*a')
apadrv-start: call(in-use=592, alloc=16344), compile(in-use=37448, alloc=42256)
kkoqbc-start
            : call(in-use=592, alloc=16344), compile(in-use=38336, alloc=42256)
kkoqbc-subheap (create addr=000000001915C238)Looks like the query never had a chance to start executing - it is still parsing after 20 minutes.
I am not sure that this is a good example - the query either executes very fast, or never has a chance to start executing. But, it might still make your point physical I/O is not always the problem when performance problems are experienced.
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

Guide me to tune the query

Hi All,
I need to tune the query which is taking more than 1 hour to execute over 8 Lakhs of record.
SQL> explain plan for SELECT C.aci_cust_code      cust_code,
2 C.aci_cust_name cust_name,
3      R.NAME ruledefination,
4 B.RULECODE ALERTS,
5 A.custom1 tran_id,
6 TD_get_value('AMLTRANTYPE', RTRIM(A.custom17)) trantype,
7 A.CUSTOM18 tran_nature,
8 A.custom25 tran_date,
9 A.messageno messageno,
10 TD_get_value('AMLTRANSTATUS', A.status) msgstatus,
11 D.acai_acct_type acct_type,
12 A.custom19 acct_number,
13 A.CURRENCY CURRENCY,
14 A.priorityamount amount,
15 A.operator USERNAME,
16 A.msgdb_id msgdb_id,
17 A.msg_mode_in msg_mode_in
18 FROM MSGDB A,
19 MSGALERTS B,
20 AML_CUST_INFO C,
21      AML_CUST_ACC_INFO D,
22 RULETBL2 R,
23           (SELECT tdkey FROM tabledetails WHERE tdidcode = 'AML-INCLUDEQ' ) amlqueues
24 WHERE A.msgdb_id = B.msgdb_id AND
25 A.queueid = amlqueues.tdkey AND
26           A.MSG_MODE_IN = 'AML-TRANS' AND
27 A.custom15 = C.aci_cust_code AND
28 A.CUSTOM19=D.ACAI_ACCT_NUMBER(+) AND
29 TO_CHAR(A.custom25,'YYYYMMDD') BETWEEN
30      TO_CHAR(TO_DATE('2011/01/01','YYYY/MM/DD'),'YYYYMMDD')
31 AND TO_CHAR(TO_DATE('2011/01/31','YYYY/MM/DD'),'YYYYMMDD')
32 AND B.RULECODE = R.RULECODE
33 ORDER BY A.custom25, msgdb_id,B.rulecode;
Explained.
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1081661146
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 173K| 30M| | 12697 (2)| 00:02:33 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 173K| 30M| 66M| 12697 (2)| 00:02:33 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 173K| 30M| | 5580 (4)| 00:01:07 |
| 3 | VIEW | index$_join$_005 | 3395 | 81480 | | 42 (3)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | | | | | |
| 5 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | IDX_RCODE | 3395 | 81480 | | 10 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0040836 | 3395 | 81480 | | 31 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1737 | 276K| | 5534 (4)| 00:01:07 |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN | | 559 | 86645 | | 4575 (3)| 00:00:55 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 448 | 56000 | | 4463 (3)| 00:00:54 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 448 | 47040 | | 4404 (3)| 00:00:53 |
|* 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MSGDB | 451 | 35178 | | 4403 (3)| 00:00:53 |
|* 12 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_MODEDATE | 2292 | | | 4323 (3)| 00:00:52 |
|* 13 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_TABLEDETAIL | 1 | 27 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | ACC_NUMBER_TYPE | 58947 | 1151K| | 58 (4)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AML_CUST_INFO | 18340 | 537K| | 111 (1)| 00:00:02 |
| 16 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MSGALERTS | 868K| 6782K| | 944 (4)| 00:00:12 |
There is no index on RULECODE of MSGALERTS and RULETBL2 table.
Could yu guys guide me how to tune this query with or without creating any new index.
Thanks,

To emphasise what hoek has said regarding dates, NEVER compare dates with dates by converting them to strings (or numbers). By doing so, you remove vital information from the optimizer.
For example, what is the difference between "31st Dec 2010" and "1st Jan 2011"? Easy, they're dates, that's 1 day.
But what's the difference between "20101231" and "20110101"? Easy: 20110101 - 20101231 = 8870.
That makes the difference between the optimizer guessing 1 row or 8870 rows... a fairly big difference, I think you'll agree, which could well impact on the plan the optimizer chooses.
One other point - leaving the clause as dates gives:
AND    a.custom25 BETWEEN TO_DATE('2011/01/01', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
                      AND TO_DATE('2011/01/31', 'YYYY/MM/DD') which excludes any dates on 31st Jan 2011 except midnight, eg. 10am on 31st Jan 2011 won't be returned by your query.
If you're after rows for a given month, then you could do:
AND    trunc(a.custom25, 'mm') = TO_DATE('01/01/2011', 'dd/mm/yyyy')

How to tune a query

how to tune a query . what are the procedures?

Following are the steps
1. Learn about RDBMS.
2. Learn how Oracle works. Oracle Architecture and other stuff.
3. Learn how SQL works (because parsing makes difference)
4. Learn about the tools provided by oracle for tuning (explain plan, sqltrace, tkprof etc.)
One you have all these knowledge. You are all set for tuning.
Thanks,
Karthick.

How to tune the query..."sum" operation is taking too much long time...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for