HR Data Distribution - PFAL

Hi,
I have to transfer HR data from HR system to another ECC system (PP/PM needs)
Should I follow the same steps as the distribution to CRM system or E-Rec system ?
The goal is to create the BP in the ECC system. But it is not working....
Thanks a lot four your help !

HI,
You have to customize distribution model for HRMD_A system and in ECC system to create BP object you have to emplement relevant badi in inbound hrmd_a process.

Similar Messages

ALE:Material Master Data Distribution

Hi
I am new to ALE Material Master Data Distribution and if the questions are incorrectly worded, please accept my apologies. It is due to lack of knowledge.
I am doing Material Master Data distribution and I am using standard basic type MATMAS03. The standard TCode MM01, MM02 has SAP tables and 3 custom tables.
I have turned the active on using BD61 and change pointers to message type.
Q: Is the change pointer, applicable to entire material master? i.e. if I change a field in Z table or standard material tables, can an IDOC be created for the entire material record?
Q: What is the function of BD52? Does this override the option Activate Change pointers for message type? Does it mean, if the changes are made to those fields in BD52 a change pointer is created?
Q: If I change Z table only, will there be a change pointer created? If not, how could I accomplish this using BD52.
Q When do we use the enhancement MGV00001?
Also, If you could add anything in addition to above queries, it will be helpful to me and I appreciate it.
With regards,
William

Thank you Sudhakar.
Your tips are good, but, I was not able to get the problem resolved.
Let me explain what I have done based on your tips.
1. MATMAS uses MATMAS03. The basic type has NOT been modified to have z fields yet.
2. Using BD52, i have created the following fields
MATERIAL ZEMM_MARA_TECH IM_ADVISORY_CODE
MATERIAL ZEMM_MARA_TECH KEY.
3. Modified the MMR for IM_ADVISORY_CODE.
I did not see a change pointer for this change.
Q: When I created above entry using BD52, was asking the table name. The table name is stored in TCD0B. What TCode is available the entries in TCDOB. For the time being, i created using SQL.
Q. Is there a follow up configuration required to capture the changes?
I will award the points in a couple of days time, even if I do not get the solution, because you have spent your precious time for the community. I will wait for a couple of days for other suggestions and close the Problem.

Master Data Distribution !

Hi!
   I want to know the purpose of master data distribution for the following between the vendor & the customer.
   1. Material Master
   2. Vendor Master & Customer Master.
Whats the purpose of linking our system with our vendor or customer etc with <b>regard to master data</b>
Pls explain in detail.
Thanks
Rahul.

Hi Rahul,
We dont do master data distribution with customer system or vendor system.
Master data distribution is done between distributed systems of the same organization using ALE configuration. So we dont link to customer or vendor systems for transfering master data but for transfering transactional data like purchase orders or sales orders etc.
Master Data Distribution
Rather than distributing the complete master data information, views of the master data can be distributed (for example, material sales data, material purchase data). Each view of the master data is stored in a separate message type.
Users can specify which data elements in a master record are to be distributed.
Various distribution strategies are supported:
·        Cross-system master data can be maintained centrally and then distributed. The final values are assigned locally.
·        A view of the master data can be maintained locally. In this case there is always one maintenance system for each view. After the master data has been maintained it is transferred to a central SAP system and distributed from there.
Types of Distribution
·        Active distribution (PUSH)
If the master data is changed (for example, new data, changes or deletions), a master data IDoc is created in the original system and is distributed by class as specified in the distribution model.
·        Requests (PULL)
A request occurs when a client system needs information about master data held in the system. You can select specific information about the master data, for example, the plant data for a material.
If you want to be notified of all subsequent changes to the master data, this has to be set up manually between the two systems. It is not yet possible for this to be done automatically in the distribution mechanism in the original system.
Transferring the Master Data
A distinction is made between transferring the entire master data and transferring only changes to the master data.
If the entire master data is transferred, a master IDoc is created for the object to be distributed in response to a direct request from a system. Only the data that was actually requested is read and then sent. The customer specifies the size of the object to be distributed in a request report.
If only changes are transferred, the master IDoc is created based on the logged changes.
Reward points for the useful answers,
Aleem.

Error during DG data distribution

Hi SAP DG Experts,
I am configuring and testing DG data distribution from central EHS system to multiple ERP systems.
I am able to send the DG idoc and ERP system is receiving that.
But the DG data creation is failing and when I check DGp7 I can get an error message "data records were not save as no selection date was available".
Please let me know if you have come across this issue?
Thanks
PS

Dear Pugazendhi
to distrbute sucessfully DG master via ALE you need to disztrbute
a.) the phrases
b.) do a proper set up of receiver system
Check e.g.
Distribution (ALE) of Exceptions to Dangerous Goods Regulations - Dangerous Goods Management (EHS-DGP) - SAP Library
This topic is asked for very rarely
C.B:

HR Master Data Distribution through ALE

Hi All,
Iam new to HR module.
I want to know what are the transactions to create HR master data like employee etc.
I want to send this HR master data from one SAP system to another SAP/non-SAP system through Idocs.
Can anyone guide me with an example for craeting the master data and sending the data through Idoc.
Thanks a lot in advance

For HR master data : PA30,PA40 .
For HR ALE data transfer: PFAL.
Plz SEARCH in SCN before posting, you will get lot of information.

Data distribution in distributed caching scheme

When using the distributed ( partitioned ) scheme in coherence , how the data distribution is happening among the nodes in data-grid..? Is there any API to control it or are there some configurations to control it ?

Hi 832093
A distributed scheme works by allocating the data to partitions (by default there are 257 of these, but you can configure more for large clusters). The partitions are then allocated as evenly as possible to the nodes of the cluster, so each node owns a number of partitions. Partitions belong to a cache service so you might have a cache service that is responsible for a number of caches and a particular node will own the same partitions for all those caches. If you have a backup count > 0 then a backup of each partition is allocated to another node (on another machine if you have more than one). When you put a value into the cache Coherence will basically perform a hash function on your key which will allocate the key to a partition and therfore to the node that owns that partition. In effect a distibuted cache works like a Java HashMap which hashes keys and allocates them to buckets.
You can have some control over which partition a key goes to if you use key association to co-locate entries into the same partition. You would normally do this to put related values into the same location to make processing them on the server side more efficient in use-cases where you might need to alter or query a number of related items. For example in finanial systems you might have a cache for Trades and a cache for TradeValuations in the same cache service. You can then use key association to allocate all the Valuations for a Trade to the same partition as the parent Trade. So if a Trade was mapped to partition 190 in the Trade cache then all of the Valuations for that Trade would map to partition 190 in the TradeValuations cache and hence be on the same node (in the same JVM process).
You do not really want to have control over which nodes partitions are allocated to as this could alter Coherence ability to evenly distribute partitions and allocate backups properly.
JK

WBS data distribution for IDOC-PI-JDBC with system status 'CRTD' not working.

Hello Experts,
I am busy with a project where the PS project creation and updates should be transfered to the external legacy system through IDOC-PI-JDBC scenario.
I am using the BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN for this process. This scenario is working fine with the projects system status released (REL).
If the system status is Created (CRTD) then no idoc creation happening therefor no data distribution of work breakdown structure(WBS) to the legacy system.
Can anybody give me some suggestion of make it happening.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Antony.

Hello all,
I did it with the help of my abap developer.
We implemented a BADI, and from the BADI we created the idoc.
When the idoc is there the legacy system receive the data.
Regards,
Antony.

Data distribution scheme and database fragmentation

Hi all,
I'm working on a scenario (University) involving the fragmentation of a central database. A company has regional offices i.e. (England, Wales, Scotland) and each regional office has differing combinations of business areas. They currently have one central database in their head office and my task is to "design a data distribution scheme". By scheme does this mean something like horizontal / vertical fragmentation? Also can somebody point me to an Oracle specific example of creating a fragmented table? I've tried to search online and have found the "partition by" keyword but not much else except for database linking - but I'm thinking this is more concerned with querying than actually creating the fragments.
Many thanks for your time

>
Partitioning is what the tutor meant by "fragmentation". So if there is a current central database and I have created new databases for each regional office I could run something like the below statement on the regional databases to create a bespoke version of the employee table filtered by data relevant to them? This is all theoretical and we don't have to develop the database, I just want to get the syntax correct - Thanks!
>
There you go talking about 'new databases' again. You said your original task was this
>
my task is to "design a data distribution scheme".
>
Is the task to give the regions access to their own data in the ONE central DB? Or to actually create a new DB for each region that contains ONLY that regions data?
So are we talking ACCESS to a central DB by region? Or are we talking replication of the entire central DB to multiple regions?
Your example table is partitioned by region. But if each region has their own DB why would you put data for other regions in it?
If you are wanting each region to have access to their own data in the central DB then you could partition the central DB tables like your example:
CREATE TABLE employees (
id INT NOT NULL,
fname VARCHAR(30),
lname VARCHAR(30),
hired DATE NOT NULL DEFAULT '1970-01-01',
separated DATE NOT NULL DEFAULT '9999-12-31',
job_code INT,
store_id INT
PARTITION BY LIST(region_id) (
PARTITION Wales VALUES IN (2)
); But if you are creating a regional DB that includes data only for that region there is no need to partition it.

Full Master Data Distribution in ALE - Vendor Master CREMAS(Full Distributi

Hi Experts,
   I have to do a Full Master Data Distribution in ALE - Vendor Master CREMAS(Full Distribution) using BD21.
   I have already read the blog of Mickel and incorporated the code in Change_Pointer_Read.
   It is still not working. Should I include the code at the end of the Function Module. If yes, how to code at the last as
   I can include my code at the SAP suggest Enhancement and End Enhancement.
   Is there any way I can create the implicit Enhancement at the end of the Function Module.
   I will appreciate any help to make the Full Distribution work.
Thanks,
Mich

Hi,
   Here is the link.
   /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2009/06/04/distribution-of-full-master-data-objects-from-change-pointers
   My requirement is to send the whole Vendor Master in a IDoc even though for eg there is only one field change in address field of Vendor Master. Full Master Data distribution. But the program BD21 creates only IDocs with segments where the changes are made in the particular tab like address.
   Is there any Enhancement or way to enforce the whole Master Data(CREMAS) to be distributed.
   I will really appreciate any helpful answer .
Thanks,
Mich

MAXDB : Data Distribution

Hi,
What is the counterpart for Histograms (in Oracle) in MaxDB? i.e How can we get the data distribution in MAXDB?

> I would like to know whether kernel trace provides the information about this optimization and sampling?? If not, how can this optimizer trace be accessed or found?
Yes, activating the kernel trace for the optimizer would create further informational output.
Anyhow, this output is intended for the developer of the optimizer and difficult to understand.
It's nothing like the CBO trace of oracle.
Really - if you want to understand better what the optimizer "thought" about your data, then use EXPLAIN JOIN and EXPLAIN SEQUENCE. These commands produce output that deliver some useful information.
Apart from that it should be clear, that the inner workings of the optimizer are not documented and changed all the time to improve performance and stability. In 7.6 alone there had been so many changes and enhancements.
As the general design goal of MaxDB is ease of use it shouldn't be necessary to know what the optimizer exactly does.
If you find your statement is badly optimized - post it here and we have a look.
Maybe it's a bug that should be fixed.
regards,
Lars

MDG-F data distribution in case of add on deployment

Hi Expert
Can any one describes the procedure for MDG-F data distribution for add-on deployment scenario?
Is it required to release edition each time? Then what is meaning of check box- Immediately Distribute Change Requests:in MDG 6.1 if you have to replicate edition manually each time? Is data replication model is required for data distribution as well?

Hello Sanjay
MDG-F is a Flex model. You have to configure replication model in any case.
There are 2 ways to replicate data from MDG.
1. Auto Replication - Here you have to mark immediately distribute change request while creating edition. With this tick mark, data will get replicated automatically. No need to release any edition.
2. Manual replication - When you want to replicate the data manually, do not tick the auto distribution option. The data will get stored in the edition. You can release the edition any time. Only thing you need to make sure that there is no open change request in the edition. Once you release the edition, you can view the edition in manual replication option.
Kiran

I would like to know what data represents the yellow "Other" in the Data Distribution Window on the Summary page of the iPad. It varies between a low of 1.50 GB to as much 5 GB. It seems to me that this is wasted space. Any ideas?

I would like to know what data represents the yellow "Other" in the Data Distribution Window on the Summary page of the iPad. It varies between a low of 1.50 GB to as much 5 GB. It seems to me that this is wasted space. Any ideas?

I have observed my "Other" data increases in size after I deleted a video. My Other data once get to 18GB, yes eighteen.
It seems like the only way to control this mysterious "Other" data is restoring the iPad to its manufacture configuration. Restore it to a previous back up doesn't help either. Once in a while is ok, but several times a month is a pain.
After the last restore (to manufacture), my other immediately jump to 0.4GB and seems to hold at 0.65GB.
Looks more and more like a bug in iOs.

Transaction PFAL for ALE HR data distribution

Hi Experts,
We're facing a problem using transaction PFAL for HR distribution to our RPM system. We have our HR data defined in the ECC system but yet, when we run the transaction we get the message No data selected for distribution
Any idea on which customizing may be missing?
Thanks!
Neil

Hi Neil Billqvist,
First you must be sure you used the right options in PFAL before going over to missing customizations. Maybe no data was found because wrong options were informed. I don't know what you are integrating with HR, but there is a useful building block about HR ALE distribution. Maybe there you'll find what's missing.
[SAP Best Practices D59 - HR Integration to Project Resource Planning|http://help.sap.com/bestpractices/BBLibrary/documentation/D59_BB_InstallGuide_EN_UK.doc]
Also check...
[ALE QuickStart for Distributed HR|help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CABFAALEHR/CABFAALEHR_ALE_QS.pdf]
[Distributing HR Master Data and Org. Structure to CRM via ALE|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/30139fb0-360c-2a10-1e9f-9d5417754983]
Regards,

Problem in txn code PFAL, HR Master Data Distribution

Hi All,
I'm using the txn PFAL to distrubute HR master data from one system to another, the system is not picking up the data from Infotye 0001 but it is picking up from other infotypes. What can be the possible reasons.
         The select statment generated by the system is as below ( SQL trace ) is as below:
SELECT * FROM "PA0001"
WHERE "MANDT" = 600 AND "PERNR" = 000000
                       AND "BEGDA" <= 20060623
                       AND "ENDDA" >= 200060623
                   ORDER BY ..............
       As the value in pernr field is 00000000 the system is unable to pick up the data. Now my question is what can be the possible reasons for the pernr value to be initial. Is it an authorization issue? If so what should need to do?

Go to PA04 and check whether the number range currently assigned to your employees has been reinitialised to 0. That is the first check point.

Problem with data distribution from HCM to e-Recruiting

Hello masters:
I have a problem when I try to distribute data from HCM to e-Recruiting. I´m getting code 51 just for the PA infotypes segments (E1P0000, E1P0001, etc.). The error message tha I am receiving is:
"Error in subroutine read_namtb for structure of infotype".
My e-Recruiting system is SAP EHP 1 for SAP NetWeaver 7.0, so I'm using Business Partners for storing data from PA infotypes.
I'm using message type HRMD_ABA, basic type HRMD_ABA05.
I think it could be the implementation HRRCF00_INBD_NEWMOD from the badi HRALE00INBOUND_IDOC, because it usually get inactive even though I go to activate it.
Does anybody knows what can I do?
Thanks in advance!
Edited by: Rodrigo Arenas Arriola on Jun 25, 2009 2:45 AM

Hello Rodrigo,
Ifyou are using EhP1 for NW 7.0 you should have E-Recruiting 600 EhP 4 on your system.
I never encountered this special error message so far, so i have to "guess". The message indicates that the system had trouble reading some infotype information.
The ALE distribution for EhP4 is storing the PA data in new infotypes 558*. The error you get points to a missing BAdI activation. If the BAdIs are not activated correctly, ALE will try to write the information from the PA infotypes 1 to 1 into the E-Recruiting system. But E-Recruiting does not know the PA infotypes which should exactly lead to the error you get.
Could you check the following settings:
BAdI                     Implementation
HRSYNC_P                 CONV_HR_DATA_TO_EREC -> active
HRALE00INBOUND_IDOC      HRRCF00_INBD_NEWMOD -> active
HRALE00SPLIT_INBOUND     HR_INB_PROCESS_IDOC -> inactive
HRALE00INBOUND_IDOC      HRRCF00_DELETE_SPREL -> inactive
Kind Regards
Roman

HR Data Distribution - PFAL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for