HR Form Editor, How to Make a Rule to change - value to no sign

Dear All,
I am making a pay slip in HR Form Editor and in a window i am displaying wage type text and values, values are negative but I want then to be displayed with No sign.
Can some one explain to me how to eliminate a sign of wage type vales in a window by using a rule or any other methord.
Regards.

Hi,
create a new 'line layout' for your specific form and have the value for conversion set to '19 - No +/- sign'.
Of course the specific WT should be linked to this new 'line layout' under step 'Window'
Have fun.
Wilfred.

Similar Messages

How to make exception rules for Stylish rules which change fonts?

How to make exception rules for Stylish rules which change fonts?
I use [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stylish/ Stylish add-on] to change specific fonts to other fonts of my choice, but I have a problem. I want to change the font Arial to Tahoma in almost all pages I visit, but with the exception of websites as wikipedia.org. Because of this, I find myself having a very long list of domains to change Arial to Tahoma, only because I don't want that rule to apply to wikipedia.org and additional one or two other websites.
The current rule I'm using is, (my actual list is a lot longer, but this is just an example): 
'''''@-moz-document domain("mozilla.org"), domain("thefreelibrary.com"), domain("sil.org"), domain("ethnologue.com") {''''' 
'''''@font-face { font-family: 'Arial'; src: local('Tahoma'); }''''' 
I can't use the following rule because I don't want it to apply to wikipedia.org: 
'''''@font-face { font-family: 'Arial'; src: local('Tahoma'); }'''''

Try something like this: 
 
<pre><nowiki>@font-face { font-family: 'Arial'; src: local('Tahoma'); }
@-moz-document domain(wikipedia.org){
@font-face { font-family: 'Arial'; src: local('Arial'); }
</nowiki></pre>

How to make Settl. rule mandatory before release ?

Hi,
I have project with settlement to AUC and to the superior wbs elements. I want to have the settlement rule to be made mandatory (before Release) for all those WBS elements, where it will be settled to superior WBS elements. How to make this mandatory ? Is it possible through validations or is there any BAdI available for this ? I had checked for user exits, i could not find any suitable one.
thanks in advance.
Vinodh

Hi
1.For making settlement rule manditory, check with function module "CJPN_SETTLEMENT_RULES" and put into validation in OPSI t.code..
2. when settlement rule is created system status will be set to SETC. So while saving the project , you can check if the status is SETC or not and the throw the required error.
You can use BAdi = Workorder_update interface AT_SAVE.
For staus check you can use BAPI_STATUS_CHECK and pass Objnr of the WBS and check for SETC ( Sys Status = I0028).
try this options
Thanks
S.Murali

Portal Forms - How to make a Field with DEFAULT value NON-EDITABLE by Users

I HAVE A FORM WITH A DATE FIELD ON IT WITH DEFAULT VALUE.
THIS IS A TABLE-FIELD.
I WANT THE FIELD TO BE DISPLAYED ON THE FORM BUT NOT TO ALLOW
USERS TO EDIT/CHANGE IT.
HOW CAN I DO THIS?
TKS IN ADVANCE

Hi,
see Re: sequencing problem-Forms
Regards Michael

HR Form Editor - how to display text on payslip

Hi Experts,
I have an issue in HR Form Editor ( TCode PE51).
In the earnings window of a payslip I have a wage type 2041(Ticket Fare Payment). At the time of evaluation if there is a value for this wage type then some text message has to be displayed for such a employee.
Can anybody please guide me for the proper solution.
I have created text module for the text to be appeared and placed it as a single field.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Aisha.

Try Exploring BADI ADDR_PRINTFORM_SHORT. This is the only place wherein we can think to write some custom code for Remnuneration statement.
The other way is the do the Customer Enhancement for transaction PC00_M16_CEDT. Also try searching SAP Notes I think there are couple which can be of help.
Regards
Shital

How to make slicer to remember selected values while moving from report to another

I have Power View on SharePoint 2013 and OLAP Cube on SQL Server 2014 solution.
1) I select slicer values and graphs are updated
2) I move to next page on same Power View file and use slicers.
3) I come back to original reports. My slicer valuers are empty.
Is it possible to make slicer to remember selected values while browsing from reports to another?
Ken
Kenny_I

Hi Kenny_I,
This seems to a by design issue. The selected values within a slicer will be stored in Memory. When we go to another report, the memory will be released.
Best Regards,
Black

How to make optimizer fetch and join values from Indexes, no table access.

Hi All,
i am having a query which is just checking the existence of the values according to some of the filter criteria, and involves two tables in join. and i want optimizer to find the existence i.e the reult of the query by only accessing indexes only, not to go through table scan using indexes. Is there any way so that i can modify my query or force the optimizer to do the same? below is the existing plan of the query in which its accessing tables using indexes, which causing bottleneck in my DB as these tables are bulky ones.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1209914516
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | | | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | |
| 3 | FAST DUAL | | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 24 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 5 | SORT UNIQUE | | 1 | 10 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | INVOICELINEDISB | 1 | 10 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_INVLINEDISB_UOMCD | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 8 | PARTITION HASH ITERATOR | | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICEHEADERDISB | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |
|* 10 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | P_INVOICEHEADERDISB_PART | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "XIGNCMN"."INVOICEHEADERDISB" "INVOICEHEADERDISB","XIGNCMN"."INVOICELINEDISB"
"INVOICELINEDISB" WHERE "INVOICELINEDISB"."UNITOFMEASURECD"='USD' AND
"INVOICEHEADERDISB"."INVOICEPK"="INVOICELINEDISB"."INVOICEPK" AND "INVOICEHEADERDISB"."PAYPK"=8135488395))
7 - access("INVOICELINEDISB"."UNITOFMEASURECD"='USD')
9 - filter("INVOICEHEADERDISB"."PAYPK"=8135488395)
10 - access("INVOICEHEADERDISB"."INVOICEPK"="INVOICELINEDISB"."INVOICEPK")
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
14 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
410 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client

Jonathan Lewis wrote:
930254 wrote:
Hi All,
i am having a query which is just checking the existence of the values according to some of the filter criteria, and involves two tables in join. and i want optimizer to find the existence i.e the reult of the query by only accessing indexes only, not to go through table scan using indexes. Is there any way so that i can modify my query or force the optimizer to do the same? below is the existing plan of the query in which its accessing tables using indexes, which causing bottleneck in my DB as these tables are bulky ones.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1209914516
| Id | Operation                              | Name                     | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                          |     1 |       |     6 (17)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                        |                          |     1 |       |            |          |       |       |
|* 2 |   FILTER                               |                          |       |       |            |          |       |       |
|   3 |    FAST DUAL                           |                          |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   4 |    NESTED LOOPS                        |                          |     1 |    24 |     4 (25)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   5 |     SORT UNIQUE                        |                          |     1 |    10 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   6 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID       | INVOICELINEDISB          |     1 |    10 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|* 7 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | IDX_INVLINEDISB_UOMCD    |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   8 |     PARTITION HASH ITERATOR            |                          |     1 |    14 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY |
|* 9 |      TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICEHEADERDISB        |     1 |    14 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |
|* 10 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                | P_INVOICEHEADERDISB_PART |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "XIGNCMN"."INVOICEHEADERDISB" "INVOICEHEADERDISB","XIGNCMN"."INVOICELINEDISB"
"INVOICELINEDISB" WHERE "INVOICELINEDISB"."UNITOFMEASURECD"='USD' AND
"INVOICEHEADERDISB"."INVOICEPK"="INVOICELINEDISB"."INVOICEPK" AND "INVOICEHEADERDISB"."PAYPK"=8135488395))
7 - access("INVOICELINEDISB"."UNITOFMEASURECD"='USD')
9 - filter("INVOICEHEADERDISB"."PAYPK"=8135488395)
10 - access("INVOICEHEADERDISB"."INVOICEPK"="INVOICELINEDISB"."INVOICEPK")
The sort unique at line 5 is surprising, I can't think of an obvious reason why it should appear unless the optimizer is trying to do something very clever to work around a problem we can't see (such as a statistics error with the hash partitioned indexe).
Assuming that the test would do better starting with invoiceheaderdisn.paypkl I have to ask if you have an index on INVOICELINEDISB(INVOICEPK).The optimizer's choice of driving table indeed looks odd. Could it be due to misleading statistics or plain bug or just a case of CBO preferring a non-partitioned table over partitioned table when deciding the driving table? I must admit this design does look odd as it appears INVOICEHEADERDISB is a parent table and INVOICELINEDISB is a child table but somehow the parent table has been partitioned (using hash partitioning, I assume) but the child table is not.
However, once CBO has decided the driving table, the SORT UNIQUE is not quite surprising. Assuming optimizer knows that there is a parent-child relationship between INVOICEHEADERDISB and INVOICELINEDISB table (based on INVOICEPK column), CBO needs to access only INVOICEPK and UNITOFMEASURECD columns fron the INVOICELINEDISB table in order to process the join. It uses index range scan on UNITOFMEASURECD table in order to get (part of) the necessary data and then accesses INVOICELINEDISB table to get the values of INVOICEPK column. Being a child table, it is possible that the driving row source will contain duplicate values for INVOICEPK column but not necessarily sorted. As CBO knows that outer table (i.e. INVOICEHEADERDISB) has a PK on INVOICEPK column, each row in driving row source will have either 1 or 0 rows matching from outer table. It appears that CBO "decides" that by eliminating the duplicate values of the INVOICEPK from driving row source, it can reduce the number of times the INVOICEHEADERDISB table is accessed.
Now I am not sure if CBO does all this (eliminating duplicates from driving row source) only because the outer table is partitioned.
Coming back to OP's original question, I believe OP will have to change the index definitions in order to avoid table access for this query. But there has to be a strong and logical argument to make this kind of change for just one query.
Hope this helps.

How to Make Settlement Rule Mandatory in Sales Order(In Acct Assigt Tab)

Hi Gurus,
I have a business requirement. For Free of charge 3rd party orders (yes they have FOC orders delivered by third party) the business wants to ensure that the Settlement rule should be mandatory. They enter cost center & receiver in the settlement rule.
i.e the order should not save till Settlement rule is maintained in the line item in the Acct Assignment tab.
Please let me know how this can be done.
1: Applied my brains on incompletion procedure but does not seems like it can be done there.
2: Is there something in CO where some setting can make it mandatory to enter settlement rule in Sales order?
3: I s there any other way in user-exits or ABAP?
4: Is there any setting in Item category(I could not locate any)?
5: Can this be done via Requirement class.
Please assist to resolve this one.

Dear,
It depends on settings in Requirement Class (OVZG) and Account Assignment Catg (AAC) in OME9
If your AAC is E in Req Class, then your sales order is a CO object.
Requirement Class in IMG can be checked - IMG > Controling > Prod Cost Planning > Cost Obj Controling > Prod Cost By Sales Order > Control of Requirement.
Or any filed any you can Make mandatory through Transaction variant SHD0.

How to make a rule for BPM application

Hi Guys,
I have a BPM (Purchase Request Approval) application and runing in SAP portal. I want to make a simple rule in in Rule Composer that if the amount is > than 5000 then it should go to manager for approval other wise process goes further.
Can any one tell me how can I achieve it?? step by step ??
My Environment
SAP NW CE with EHP 1 Java stack on windows XP prof.
Regards,
Naeem

Hi Brian,
To help you in quickly creating simple rules in BRM the following links may be useful -
Rule Tutorial Center has a lot of refernce applications and videos - SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management Resources Center [original link is broken]
The document to help in end to end creation of rules - http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00a4a7c5-da42-2b10-939c-8ec355346f3a
Regards,
Arti

HP knows how to make KISS-rule, simple, ink-sparing printers

I posted a message earlier today about HP's shameless ripoff re ink usage. In that thread, one poster commented about printer design, print heads, etc., by way of explanation as to why my HP 6100 appears to use color ink, when in fact I am not printing anything in color.
It occurred to me that the answer is simple, and understandable: everying knows, and certainly everyone at HP involved with printer design and sales knows, that on earlier printers--such as the HP 870, which I had for YEARS--the ink cartridge could be easily refilled (only once did I use a refilled cartridge), and they did not use enough color ink.
I finally had to dump my 870 when it became clogged with ink. And boy, do I mean CLOGGED. I set it down on-end on the floor and the ink came dripping out.
The case of the 870,. and no doubt other printers, shows clearly that HP does know how to design a KISS-rule printer, one that uses no more ink than necessary, that doesn't have any issues with print heads, etc.
All corporations in the US must make money, and no one begrudges them their profit motive. What I object to is when they do it in a way that is such a blatant and unavoidable rip-off.
(NOTE: I would have posted this message in my earlier thread, but it appears that that thread is closed; or at any rate, there was no REPLY button.)

As I mentioned before you need to select "Print in Grayscale" and "Black ink only" to minimize color use. There are a few other considerations:
Always keep the printer plugged directly into an active outlet. Using an external switch (such as an outlet switch or power strip) will cause ink to be used from all colors at startup. This is because the printer will lose track of how long it has been since the last print job and will do the maximum servicing at startup
For your usage (mostly black, rare color printing) I would suggest the Deskjet 1010, or perhaps a used Deskjet 6840 or 6540. When you get the printer install the black cartridge but keep the color cartridge in its original package until you actually need to print color. The Deskjet 1010 will print with the black or color cartrdige removed in ink backup mode.
You are not likely going to be happy with any manufacturer's IIC type printer. They will all use color ink even when printing in B&W as the carriage that moves across the apper contains both the lack and color printheads. The printheads will dry out if some ink is not "spit" through the nozzles. The frequency of this will vary; some printers will measure the relative humidity and adjust the timing but typically every nozzle must be cleared every ten seconds or so while exposed to air. Your Deskjet 870 had color droplets about 30 pL in size and had 192 nozzles between the three colors. Modern printers have droplets more like 5 pL and may have ten times as many nozzles to keep clear. The smaller nozzles may require more frequent servicing.
Bob Headrick, HP Expert
I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

Apple Mail 8.2: How to make a rule for a domain

I get many unwanted emails from AOL.com and cannot figure out a way to create a rule that applies to the entire domain. <*aol.com> does not work and the 'sender' name changes with each one.
How can I create a rule for the entire aol.com domain?

DenaliDad wrote:
Correct. That doesn't work and neither does *@aol.com
It worked when I tested it on my mac (using another domain). The * is useless. "contains" includes any variation on the string.
Also, there is no need for @, either.

In forms 9i how to make a grid populated based on varying no of rows and cl

Hi,
I have a small query in oracle forms.
I have a selection screen like
HParm1 HParm2 HParm3 . . . . .
Vparm1 Y/N Y/N Y/N . . . .
VParm2 Y/N Y/N Y/N . . . .
VParm3 Y/N Y/N Y/N . . . .
I have three tables as
Table 1
Field1 with values Hparm1 , Hparm2 etc
Table2
Field2 with values Vparm1 , Vparm2 etc
Table3
Field1 - values- Hparm
Field2 - values - Vparm
Field3 - Values - Y/N
Any Idea how can i show this on the screen.

Hello Sneha
Columns can be fixed using the fieldcatalog (lvc_s_fcat-FIX_COLUMN = 'X').
However, I am not aware of any possibility to fix rows.
Regards
Uwe

How to make all rules active in Mail

Every time I sync my MacBook with my IMac through Mobile Me, the rule sync OK but it deactivate my rules. I have to click on every single one again to make them active. Is there a faster way to make all the rules active at once. TIA.

Make them active then re-sync. You are obviously updating from the old saved information not the new. If that doesn't work, then remove your computer from the authorized sync list and start fresh. You can then copy all your information FROM the computer to MobileMe.

Form Checkboxes - how to make mandatory?

Hi,
Have a dilemma...
1 - Working on a form
2 - In the form there are checkboxes for:
a) MasterCard
b) VISA
c) Sending a Check
The client wants the ANY ONE of the three to be checked. And
the form to come back if one of the 3 IS NOT checked.
I do not understand how to set this up? Can anyone provide
advice or help?
Thanks!

Do not use checkboxes. Use a set of radio buttons or a drop
down menu (select box).

Submit form button - how to make it work in order to send form ?

I have contact form in my flash file, what do I have to do in so the people who fill the form to actually send the message to my email ? Right now I have this button but it does nothing.
xml file button:
submit
thank you.
alfateam

thank you,
As a newbie I lost alot of time google-ing ..only to find out after 2 hours that my templates has 3 files with it.. contact.php, form config, anf form structure. Only 2 fileds to edit and the job was done
Now I'am fighthing to create autoresponed with file attached. Cpanel doesn't allowed by default so I need ascii mail , half hour already since I try.

HR Form Editor, How to Make a Rule to change - value to no sign

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for