HR Implementation OAF and workflow consultant position in Bay Area

We are looking fora consultant with at least 8+ years of exp in Self-service HR implementation experience (optional) with expertise in OAF (must have) and workflow (must have)
Ex Oracle will be easy to close.
[email protected],510.709.3820

Report Abuse!
This is a technical forum, and if you are looking to hire someone, there are many resumes uploaded in the job websites!

Similar Messages

  • What is the roles of technical and functional consultants in ESS/MSS area?

    Gurus,
    What is the roles of technical consultants in ESS/MSS area?
    What is the roles of functional consultants in ESS/MSS area?
    Please help me see the differences.
    Thanks,

    Hi Thaman,
    Responsibility of functional consultant in ESS/MSS:- Functional configuration under SPRO > Employee self service and manager self service, then preparation of Functional specification design (FSD) if any deviation from standard SAP, Unit test plan preparation and all functionailty testing
    Responsibility of Technical consultant:- Preparation of Technical specification design document (TSD), activation of work flow and creation of workflow if additional is required. Creatio of form like vacancy requisition form, new position creation form etc.
    Also some kind of technical configuration is there in SPRO for workflow and form
    Regards,
    Purnima

  • Oracle Fin/Functional Position at Bay Area

    Oracle Fin/Functional Position
    Need profiles with big 5 experience
         Should be a Functional person but knows technical stuff like API, Coding, and Write SQL, Designing documents and talking to end users
         Candidate should have worked on Global Delivery model and have complete process Knowledge
         Good with Education Background (Masters) and If education in India (Well known college)
         System Development Methodologies
         Worked in top companies like Deloitte, Infosys, Wipro / Oracle / KPMG
         Large scale implementation
         Exposure to integration
         Good at designing application
         Should be very Strong with A/R, customization, Run Queries
    contact [email protected] or 510.709.3820

    Report Abuse!
    This is a technical forum, and if you are looking to hire someone, there are many resumes uploaded in the job websites!

  • Develop Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online and On-Premise

    Hi Expert,
    I have the question about Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online vs ShrePoint On-Premise
    Current Problem : Customer is implemented Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online but they have a problem some features that didn’t work in SharePoint Online. I will have a meeting to discuss Do and Don’t Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online compare SharePoint
    On-Premise.
    Please suggestion.
    Thank you

    Hi MasterBird,
    There is no documentation to explain the difference of the custom form and workflow between SharePoint Online and SharePoint On-Premise. For your issue, you can have a look at the following blog:
    http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/the-enterprise-cloud/get-infopath-forms-and-sharepoint-online-with-office-365/
    https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Office-365-known-issues-6b380978-84ce-49af-be5d-f7cda0fe28f9?ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US#__sharepoint_online_preview
    https://support.office.com/en-in/article/Configure-InfoPath-Forms-Services-a8609546-c0d7-4956-81b6-08e93eb4b290?ui=en-US&rs=en-IN&ad=IN
    http://blog.sharepointlearn.com/2011/11/03/sharepoint-in-office-365-the-good-the-bad-the-brilliant-and-the-ugly/
    Thanks,
    Eric
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online vs SharePoint On-Premise

    Hi Expert,
    I have the question about Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online vs ShrePoint On-Premise
    Current Problem : Customer is implemented Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online but they have a problem some features that didn’t work in SharePoint Online. I will have a meeting to discuss Do and Don’t Form and Workflow in SharePoint Online compare SharePoint
    On-Premise.
    Please suggestion.
    Thank you

    Hi MasterBird,
    For SharePoint 2013 On-premise, we can :
    Comlete control of our environment and data
    Supports heavy customization
    Keep sensitive information in-house
    Easier integration into line of business systems
    Full development options for developers
    For SharePoint Online workflow:
    Workflow 2010 & 2013 are available with Standard and Enterprise Editions without having to install
    If using Windows Azure workflow functionality is the same as 2013
    Cannot create custom Visual Studio workflows
    For InfoPath Form Services you will need Office 365 Enterprise Could Edition or SharePoint Online Plan 2
    More information, please refer to the video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNtCH3qOk2g
    Best Regards,
    Wendy
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Oracle workflow consultant (with workflow builder exp)

    May 25 2004
    Our client is a major bank in Jamaica and they have a requirement for an Oracle Workflow Consultant. This is a 6 months contract and it would be 3 weeks/month in Jamaica and 1 week/month back home. All expenses including trave, accomodation (5 star) and meals would be taken care of. There would also be a per diem and a bonus at the end of contract.cllient considering US/Canada based consultants.
    ·     A Technical Consultant with expert experience with Workflow
    ·     Expert technical experience and strong functional knowledge
    ·     Experience using “Workflow Builder” as a tool
    ·     Experience with configuration, customization, and modification of pre-configured workflows with Workflow Builder to suite business applications
    ·     Customization of workflow and optional set-ups such as enabling email process
    ·     Experience with configuration/escalation/exceptions in workflow
    ·     Workflow Builder is accessed at the systems administration level so consultant has to have experience with systems administration (application system administration)
    ·     A “workflow” guru would have performed this function for at least 50% of the time – (rest of the time he/she would have done application system administration, technical design/development…
    Skills:
    Very strong technical user level of workflow
    Very strong experience with Workflow Builder
    Oracle 11i, SQL or SQL Plus
    Workflow knowledge from HR or elements of HR Module
    Please contact for more details:
    Rohini Mehtani
    IT Resource Consultant
    Bevertec
    [email protected]
    416-695-7525 ext: 229

    Could you please tell me ...........
    Whether Oracle application version 11.5.9 is compatible with OAF 11.5.10 (patch p4045639_11i_GENERIC). If yes, then why my pages are not working?
    Not even the Existing FWK Tutorial application is also not working, nothing is working!!! Do I need to modify somehting?
    Please suggest any solution I have to Develop new self service application.

  • Implementation process and Support Process diagrams

    Hi Guys
    I need the implementation and support process / Business Flow, flowcharts etc. i think i have confused you guys. what i am looking for is something like the activities divided into different sections like Client, onsite, offshore.
    Please note that i am not looking for ASAP.
    i am looking for activities done by the clients, onsite team and the ofshore team.
    I am looking for diagrams.
    Thanks in advance.
    D

    This is the land scape.
    Generally we have 3 servers 1) Development server
    2) Quality server
    3) Production server.
    Along with these servers we have Sand box in our place for trail purpose, i.e., before going to develop or testing we just develop here in our sand box and check our requirements.
    (Sand box is also called as Golden data box).
    ASAP METHODOLOGY:
    1)Project Preparation,
    2) Blue print phase,
    3) Realization phase,
    4) Testing phase,
    5) Go live phase.
    Project Preparation:
    Here we do discussions about our project with client…. i.e deciding that whether we go for B.W or not, that will help us or not, required it or not.
    Here we do making land scape, pricing or project, bidding …. Like intial things. And we do time estimation i.e for implementation generally we take 90 days.
    Main things to do…
    1. Discussions with client providing the importance of SAP BW
    2. why BW? Here we have convince the client what are the advantages if we implement BW
    advantages:
    A) End to End solution
    In R/3 we give authorization to particular level of REPORT.
    In BW we give authorization to particular level of DATA
    Eg: if we have 2 plants in R/3. if 2 users use same report. So that they may change or alter the report according to their requirement where as in BW we can give authorization to particular level of data to that particular plant accordingly where as it is not possible in others.
    B) Detail level of information in R/3.
    Aggregate level of information in BW
    C) E.R model in R/3. where as in BW it is Multi Dimensional.
    3) ROI Return on Investment
    4) Budget discussions.
    BLUE PRINT PHASE:
    Here we do ..
    I. Gathering user requirements.
    II. Form some documents like PI Documentation Tree.
    PI measure Glossory.
    III. preparing functional specs like Data Flow Diagram.
    Graphical StarSchema views
    ODS object Designs
    IV. Approval meeting: Getting approval for functional specs
    V. Kick of meeting : this is the final meeting with client about specs.
    That will be at the end of work.
    REALIZATION PHASE:
    Here we do ..
    I. we prepare technical specs based on functional specs
    II. Getting approval for Technical specs.
    III. Designing the objects basing on technical specs. (In development server).
    IV. UNIT TESTING (i.e we do general testing like the value in R/3 side is coming to BW side is same or not …etc. we use RSA3 Extract checker to check value bet. R/3 and cube)
    V. Develop unit test case document.
    VI. All developed unit test case documents will be send to client for approval
    VII. And finally transporting all the objects to quality box
    TESTING PHASE:
    Here we do ..
    1. Integration Testing: It takes nearly 6 months to 1 yr. depends on project
    2. U A T Testing : User Acceptance Test
    3. Approval
    GO LIVE PHASE:
    all objects will be transport to QUALITY to PRODUCTION BOX.
    in R/3 system only Data sources will be transported from QUALITY to PRODUCTION
    Generally all the data sources will not go live at same time. i.e., they scheduled like SD data sources in first week, MM data sources in next week, PP in next week like that depends on requirement.
    If required we do Adhoc reports that means we have to generate reports basing on available data for immediate requirements.
    In sand box we do testing ourselves like what will happen when we do change or add or alter the existing objects or any thing in current position. It is just like test box for our purpose only.
    SAP BW CONSULTANT
    In our project we have ED1 (Enterprise Development) is the developer system and 120 is the client. We have one development system, quality system and integrated planning system.
    We are 3 members here in offshore and 2 members in onsite. Onsite TL do take care of preparing technical specs. We joined in the project at realization stage. (We have 5 phases in project. 1. Project preparation 2. Blue print 3. Realization 4. Testing 5. Production)Gap analysis conducted by Onsite Team. They prepare spec and send to us.
    Here in offshore iam team member. As a team member my responsibility in this implementation project is installing objects from the business content. Apart from this every Tuesday we have conference call with onsite team. In conference call we discuss what the issues we faced till now are. What is the progress in the project? What will be the next week delivery? What about the previous issues? What are the new changes if any? After conference call completion I have to do Minutes draft of the call. I have to write a mail to onsite TL in which I mention the issues we discussed and To Do list from both sides.
    We receive technical specs from our TL. It is completely regarding the installation of objects from business content and generating regular reports.
    Finding out the cube (Ex: 0SD_C01), which we need to install, and installing the cube from BC with both data flow inwards and afterwards. This is done only once we confirmed from simulation installation so that no errors will occur while installing.
    Once the cube is installed we prepare one more cube (name starts with z like ZC001), which is the copy of the same cube, which is installed just now (intention is not to disturb the BC cube).
    After preparing the cube finding out the dataflow from the pictorial view in technical spec. In our spec data flows from Info Source to ODS and then into Cube to Multi Provider. Now prepare the ODS which contains the same characteristics and key figures as cube. Here we add two extra fields in key fields column of ODS that ZDATE & ZTIME. Date and time are populated with formulae. In Date column we define formulae SYS-DATUM and for time SYS-TIMLO.
    Creating update rules for ODS we define that ODS gets data from info source as per spec.
    No. of update rules depends on no. of info sources from which ODS gets data.
    After ODS create update rules for cube saying that cube get data from ODS.
    Next create multi provider as per spec. Even though we have only one cube we created multi provider because we want to extend it in future. Multi provider contains all the characteristics and key figures of cube for the time being. This is all as per our spec.
    Assigning data source to Info source and activating Transfer rules.
    Next creating Info Packages for full, init and delta loads.
    Next creating process chains. To create PC we follow this procedure:
    Select the cube to which data must be loaded. Go to Context menu (right click) of the cube . Select Info Source overview. It will show what data is flowing into the cube and from which info source.
    Check out whether all the info sources are assigned with data sources if not assign it. Check out whether all info packages are created or nor if not create it.
    Start creating process chains. In our process chain we have Meta chains (a chain in another chain). We have 4 process chains. One for master data (attribute) another for text and one for hierarchy and another for transaction data.
    In Master data PC collect all the info packages for master data loading and at the end add attribute change run, this chain will run daily. (0MATERIAL, 0SALESORG)
    In Text PC collect all the info packages for text one by one. This will run daily. (0MATERIAL, 0SALESORG, 0DIVISION, 0VERSION, 0VTYPE)
    In Hierarchy PC collect the info packages for hierarchies. This will run daily. (0MATERIAL).
    In Transaction data collect all the info packages with full load (temporary only). This also runs daily. (2LIS_01_S001)
    Thanks=points
    Reddy

  • How can I get mouse pressed and mouse released positions on the desktop whi

    Hello All,
    I am generating a Frame using Swing API. My requirement is I need to capture the mouse pressed and mouse released positions, whenever user drags the mouse on desktop region (i.e. outside of the Frame). I require these points to find the rectangle region user has generated starting from mouse pressed to mouse released position. I need to pass that rectangle to Robot class in order to capture that desktop region.
    Can anybody help me out how can I achieve this using java on MAC, Linux and Windows platforms?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    VPKVL

    VPKVL wrote:
    DarrylBurke wrote:
    Can't be done in Java.I don't think that there is something which can't be done using java. When searched over net, found few applications which are using java for implementing this feature but not free, asking for license fee. I checked by downloading the demo version.
    Just want to know the hint how it can be achieved so that I can move further on that lines.
    Your thoughts ?They use JNI with the OS API.

  • Lightroom Metadata editing and workflow is tedious nightmare!

    I'm new to Lightroom in just the past month, but have used it enough to see that a serious interface problem makes Lightroom version 1x virtually unusable in a deadline-oriented publishing workflow. Lightroom's Metadata editing and workflow is just a terrible nightmare, and far too tedious and slow. It appears to be an afterthought implemented by good-hearted souls who've never had to edit this sort of information under serious deadline pressures. I know Lightroom is marketed as an image database and not a file browser, but we're all looking to simplify our workflow here and with just a few subtle enhancements, Lightroom could be an excellent file browser and file import manager too.
    As it is now, the Lightroom v1x handling of File Naming and Renaming, Metadata Editing and Keyword Editing is poorly implemented and in need of an immediate overhaul to help professional photographers expedite this crucial and time-consuming first step in the archiving workflow. While Lightroom is very good at many other tasks, I give it a big fat "F" of a failing grade for these tasks.
    First, the Lightroom Library Module needs an even more simple, linear interface that steps users through a precise procedures (and helps them remember them). Arguably, to accomplish this, the Import function may need to become a separate Module that can be selected and used separately before entering the Library. As File Naming and Renaming, Metadata Editing and Keyword Editing currently are implemented, I, for one, am always forgetting to fill out one of these critical sections and can't even seem to remember that some may need to be done before importing while others appear to be conceived to be done after importing. My point is, all these related steps really need to be done together, but the Interface spreads out the functions too much, and it is nearly impossible to build a logical and linear Import workflow, especially when you are first learning Lightroom.
    I'd like to see a workflow that walks me through applying and editing (in order), File Naming, Basic and IPTC Metadata, Captioning and Keywords, so that I don't always forget some obscure step in the process (which I keep doing). Here are some specific suggestions, some of which may prove to be valid, some of which may be problems due to my lack of experience with thye software.
    1. As currently implemented, Metadata editing requires too much thought, and does not have enough intelligent automation. Eliminate as much typing as possible (See Photo Mechanic!)
    2. Lightroom needs better Metadata Presets. A "Quick Edit" view to simplify interface for editing minimal metadata info (File Name, Basic Info, Keywords, Headline, Limited Copyright Info).
    3. Separating Keyword Tags, Metadata Browser, Keywording Presets and Metadata Presets confuses the workflow. They should all appear together under one selectable module that organizes a suggested, linear workflowfor these tasks, but allows it to be customized. This is the sort of tasks that need to be learned by rote memory, and having all these panes floating around on both sides of the photo make it impossible to quickly step through these tasks.
    - Name (or Rename) files, Edit/Apply Basic and IPTC Metadata, Edit/Apply Keywords, Import or...
    - Import, Name (or Rename) files, Edit/Apply Basic and IPTC Metadata, Edit/Apply Keywords, Import
    4. Rename should offer the option of renaming the master file names on the disk, not just file names in the database (which I think is what Lightroom does, but again, this is very confusing for new users)! So, it is my belief that this feature needs a checkbox option to rename one, the other or both. But you need to be able to quickly find this dialog box every time you do an import, and it should not be hidden away out of view under the Library menu. Ideally and logically (for workflow), File Renaming should be handled when starting the Import into Lightroom.
    This is critically important because many user

    Lightroom metadata editing Part 2 (see Part 1 at top of thread)...
    ...This is critically important because many users just do not want to trust their images solely to any database and we want the ability to go look for master files with identical names should something go wrong with the software or we decide to edit the file in Photoshop outside of Lightroom or even switch to another library software program.
    My own habit is to rename every file with the date followed by a unique, three-digit file number, as in 20070717_001, 20070717_002...up to 999 etc. (I have never shot more than 999 files in a single day, but this could be a four-digit number). To file these on disk, a folder with a similar naming scheme is created for each day's shoot, although a keyword slug is added to the end instead of file numbers.
    5. Metadata Presets (Basic Info, IPTC metadata, EXIF metadata), Keywords need to be able to toggled on or off (promote/demote-expand/contract). Turning Off/On one section at a time via the Metadata Presets popup menu is too tedious...and you can't display IPTC and Large Caption together or leave Large Caption turned on. It also is difficult to remember where the Large Caption default (Preferences) setting is...
    6. Please get the EXIF data out of the way entirely when editing captions and visa-versa...And the EXIF data should not separate Basic Info and IPTC Info fields. Please relocate the EXIF to the bottom of the Metadata pane...
    7. IPTC Content, IPTC Copyright, IPTC Creator, IPTC Image expand/collapse sections need more automation:
    - The Presets fields need Preset lists of entry choices for cities, states, countries, etc.!
    - ISO Country Code automatically should be filled in when a country is entered.
    - Date created automatically should be filled in from camera EXIF data
    - Metadata Presets "Save As" should fill in old name, and allow you to rename it; (When it appears, the new name field should not be empty. This would aid in consistent, alphabetical naming
    - Metadata Presets naming should support job names, with actual Presets saved under each job name...
    8. IPTC Status EXIF, Contact, etc.
    - Caption field MUST display more than one line...(6-8 lines)!
    - Caption field MUST support Shift/Return!
    - Headline (IPTC Content) should be displayed with (and above) caption. Please present information logically!
    - Yellow popups should describe what each field name is for...some are real brain teasers...

  • Linking between organizational unit and workflow

    Hi
    I have created my organizational unit and workflow.
    Can anyone tell me how to link workflow with organizational unit?

    Hi Azra,,,
             You can link oraganisational unit and workflow by specifying the  organization unit name in the task screen.....
               Assgin values:
             Recipient type = organisational object.
             Then Select Position from Drop down list and then select the
             organisational number with f4 help.
    Simillarly assing the abbrevation of the task of workflow to the Oranisational
    plan position.
    If answer is suitable do give points.
    Thanx ....
    Mandeep      .....

  • Rename "BPM and Workflow" forum to "SAP Business Workflow"

    G'Day,
    99% of posts in the [BPM and Workflow|SAP Business Workflow; forum deal with SAP Business Workflow. It was originally intended for ccBPM which - though they share some underlying architecture - is basically XI / PI.
    A few ccBPM posts occasionally appear in the WF forum, but they are generally not answered and more appropriate in XI. These days I usually move them to XI when it's clear that the 'local' population won't answer it.
    So to avoid confusion for people I propose to rename the forum to SAP Business Workflow or at least something that doesn't confuse it with XI.
    Any input welcome.
    Cheers,
    Mike

    Hi Mike,
    Well, you probably already know what I think ;).
    If there is little to no traffic for BPM, then let's call the forum what it is, SAP Business Workflow - Or Workflow and Guided Procedures? 
    Sidebar: I posted a question to various forums a few weeks ago, regarding 'How can SAP, and ASUG WF/BPM serve you better'.  I am summarizing the responses I got below, in hopes that it helps guide you in your quest.  The names have been excluded to protect the identities, but I think there is some very valuable info in here.  Particularly the final point - which I will follow up on with the respondent.
    Anyway, you didn't ask for it, but here it is.
    > 1. Have you attended any webcasts related to SAP lately?
    No. Not lately, and not ever. (I suppose I am old-fashioned...)
    > 2. Are there any topics related to Workflow and BPM that you think are
    > important for the 'community'?
    Integrating workflows and guided procedures - e.g. enhancing existing workflows to use browser interfaces.
    > 3. Looking ahead a year, what do you see as challenges in this area?
    Processes that can be executed either in R/3 or in browsers, with information about the process progress etc, as in Guided Procedures. This will probably be the developers nightmare for the next few years.
    1. Have you attended any webcasts related to SAP lately?
    -yes I did - quite a few, but mostly on web related stuff and XI.
    2. Are there any topics related to Workflow and BPM that you think are important for the 'community'?
    - personally for me, I still find the guided procedure in Portals not so user friendly and limited. I think more education and influence around GP will be great. I think the community will also appreciate it.
    3. Looking ahead a year, what do you see as challenges in this area?
    - GP and UWL. I think the concept of "IT doing the first time and the business managing their rules" would be challenging. I have not yet seen this happen, especially on the logistics side. There is a session this year on the same topic at TechEd and I look forward to this session. Hopefully it will help us get some insight.
    Right now I am struggling with even getting Workflow off the ground and getting the business to understand what Workflow is and trying to have them budget for it. Workflow is still new to the functional group and even getting them to consider Workflow verse alternatives is somewhat of a challenge. I really have had a great consultant that has taken me under his wing and taken the time to teach me. I think we would be a great story for a presentation.
    My challenges for the next year, is how to get over the hump of selling workflow to the business and actually getting projects planned out. I don't know if anyone has an anwer to that one. My other challege is how to handle transfer of knowledge and maintaining workflow that has been built by consultants.
    1)  I have not attended many SAP webcasts (just one on Solution Manager in the past few months)  I'm planning on attending one this comming Monday on BPM.
    2) I think understanding UWL / SBWP differences, advantages, limitations on one vs the other, would be an important topic.   Also more information on Extended Notiications
    3) Challenges: Upgrades and impact on WF,  Unicode and WF and having more WF ABAP OO objects delivered by SAP, other than the "Absence Notification" sample.
    1.       I havenu2019t personally attended but as a company we give a webinar once a week and weu2019ve had some great attendance
    2.       Technically I think weu2019re OK. We see the need to tell C-level execs where workflow / BPM can help them in businessu2026.
    _3.       Workflow is becoming more and more obscure in the SAP landscapeu2026

  • E-Business Suite Application Dev using OAF and ADF (White Paper Feb. 2008)

    Hi,
    In Oracle White Paper entitled "E-Business Suite Application Dev using OAF and ADF (Feb. 2008)" it was mentioned on page 7 :
    +"When ADF 11g becomes production, we will publish a revised paper that compares OAF with ADF 11g, and discuss development against E-Business Suite."+
    I've had no luck finding a new comparison table for OAF R12 with ADF 11g :(
    can anyone help me on this?
    thanks in advance,
    Adrian

    Srini Chavali wrote:
    It is still not clear if your have to use SSO - the scripts loadsdk.sql and regapp.sql specifically are for Oracle Single Sign ON (OSSO) - the authentication schemes referred to on page 20 of the same doc do not require SSO. So, is SSO a requirement in your scenario ? If not, you should be following the steps in the section titled "Confuguring Custom Authentication" (beginning of page 20).Ouch..Sorry Srini, I have completely misinterpreted by the page no.'s in Adobe pdf reader.I was telling you about page 18 of the document.
    Anyway i'll start with configuring Custom Authentication as by your suggestion.
    But i'll move forward with no understandings about SSO and its implementations.
    All I could get is this links
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15586_01/webcenter.1111/e12405/wcadm_security_sso.htm
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/install.1111/e12002/sso_das.htm
    Is this link correct to start learning about SSO or do I need to learn anything (LDAP,OAM,etc..) before that ?

  • Implementing roles and rules based authorisation with Azure AD

    Hi all,
    I would greatly appreciate some input on feasibility and patterns I should look at for a complex technical requirement that I am currently tasked with designing.
    We have a system that comprises a web and mobile app. In the past we have implemented session based authentication through ADAM and authorisation through custom business rules contained within the applications. The authentication mechanism is in the process
    of being migrated to Azure AD and authorisation is planned to be moved to Azure AD for our next release.
    Existing authorisation within our web application is already complex. We have users that belong to different groups with a range of permissions such as read, write or admin. Additionally each user is granted access to N customers and also N locations within
    each customer. We have a requirement that any number of combinations of customers and locations be supported. Users also need to have different permissions for each entity, i.e. read access to customer 1 location 2, write access to customer 4 and administer
    customer 7. Currently these privileges are maintained within a relational database and enforced as part of each PageLoad(). Essentially this is a combination of roles and rules based authorisation.
    We are struggling to represent this complex matrix structure within Azure AD and efficiently implement the authorisation decision in Azure AD. The driver for this technical requirement is to provide re-usability of the authorisation component to other (as
    yet unidentified) applications.
    Currently the best option we have come up with is implementing custom attributes for each class of permissions and storing within this 2048 bit field a bitmask that represents whether this permission is granted for a given location (which has a many to one
    relationship with customer).
    Any help or comment would be gratefully received,
    Phil

    Hi
    When "Advance routing" is used for Task assignment; the task service asserts the folllowing fact types : Task, PreviousOutcome and TaskAction to the rules engine. These facts gives all the reqd info about the task (like outcome of the participant, task stage .. etc)
    Now in the defined ruleset; we can have rules as per our requirement that can extract info from the asserted fact types and assign task to the required/next participant.
    Also note that we write the advance rules for exception cases only.
    For example; let's say all participants have 2 possible Outcomes [COMPLETE, RECHECK]. We have defined the ideal task routing flow as :
    Participant A -> Participant B -> Participant C. This is the flow when all participant selects "COMPLETE"
    Now suppose B selects outcome as "RECHECK" then the task shld move back to A. So for this case only we need to write a advance rule.
    Pls refer to the code sample at : http://download.oracle.com/technology/sample_code/hwf/workflow-106-IterativeDesign.zip
    Also dev guide : refer to section 28.3.7.2 http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/integration.1111/e10224/bp_hwfmodel.htm#BABBFEJJ
    Thanks
    Edited by: Kania on May 19, 2010 2:41 AM

  • IDoc, EI and Workflow

    Please give me a brief idea about IDoc, EI and Workflow.
    Where I can find the useful documents?
    Can anyone give me any PPT or documents regarding the same topics?

    HI,
    Check the links below:
    ALE:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/78/217e1c51ce11d189570000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCSRVEDI/CAEDI.pdf
    Please check this online document for ALE and IDoc.
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCMIDALEIO/BCMIDALEIO.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCMIDALEPRO/BCMIDALEPRO.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CABFAALEQS/CABFAALEQS.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCSRVEDISC/CAEDISCAP_STC.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCSRVEDI/CAEDI.pdf
    Also check this links for additional information.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/dc/6b835943d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
    http://www.sapgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/ale_scenario_development_procedure.doc
    http://edocs.bea.com/elink/adapter/r3/userhtm/ale.htm#1008419
    http://www.netweaverguru.com/EDI/HTML/IDocBook.htm
    http://www.sapgenie.com/sapedi/index.htm
    IDOCS
    http://idocs.de/www5/books/IDocBook/IDOCS_CHAP09-11.pdf
    http://idocs.de/cookbooks/idoc/cb12_idoc_20_outbound/idoc_outbound_45_rsnast00/docu.htm
    IDOC / ALE Blogs
    /people/raja.thangamani/blog/2007/07/19/troubleshooting-of-ale-process
    /people/kevin.wilson2/blog/2006/11/13/ale-scenario-development-guide
    EDI:
    Advanced guide to EDI configuration
    http://www.erpgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/advanced_guide_to_edi_configuration.doc
    EDI Architecture
    http://www.cs.jyu.fi/el/tjtl63/Antin_esitys/sld003.htm
    Overview of EDI and the IDoc Interface in SAP
    http://sap-idoc2edi-consulting.com/pdfFiles/EDI_IDoc_Overview.pdf
    How to Build a Basic EDI Interface Using an Imported Schema and Map
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/818a20be-0601-0010-e3b8-ac3d5f975319
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d98675ca-0d01-0010-c5a0-c70389f1a314
    EDI Functional Design
    http://www.erpgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/interface_function_specification.doc
    Thoughts on EDI in an SAP XI Environment
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/135b0b94-0701-0010-f6a9-86a14057544a
    Workflow is a more basis related component. This component allows you to configure SAP system to trigger the mail straight to the Inbox of the manager. It can be related to approval of PR or PO or it can be of anyother purpose. The main purpose is the manager need not to login GUI screen for approval. He could select the approval button in his outlook mail(This mail will contain complete details of purchase order), it will automaticall update in SAP back end.
    Workflow will be per Business object. BO can be PR, PO etc.It is possible to set the event by when the workflow should trigger. For example it should trigger when the purchaser creates a PO and saves it . The saving action is called event. After the event is triggerred system will check for the starting conditions. It is possible to define starting condition per workflow. It is like your release strategy. If the value of PO is less than 1000 then it should be approved by one manager, if values >1000 then it should undergo approval from 2 managers.
    There are plenty of predefined workflows which could be used straigt according to the purpose expected.However workflow is delicate and has to be configured with utmost care in proper sequence to avoid in consistencies.
    Please follow the links,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/04/926f8546f311d189470000e829fbbd/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/c5/e4a930453d11d189430000e829fbbd/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/a1/172437130e0d09e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm
    A good tutorial
    http://www.thespot4sap.com/articles/Invoice_Verification_Automation_Using_SAP_Workflow.asp
    http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/wf/sap-business-workflow.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/workflow/sap-workflow.htm
    /people/alan.rickayzen/blog
    /people/jocelyn.dart/blog/2006/06/19/why-use-abap-oo-with-workflow
    a good book
    http://www.sap-press.com/product.cfm?account=&product=H950
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PSWFL/PSWFL.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4a/dac507002f11d295340000e82dec10/frameset.htm
    http://www.workflowing.com/id18.htm
    http://www.e-workflow.org/
    http://web.mit.edu/sapr3/dev/newdevstand.html
    Check the following PDF
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCBMTWFMSTART/BCBMTWFMSTART.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCBMTWFMDEMO/BCBMTWFMDEMO.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCBMTWFMPM/BCBMTWFMPM.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PSWFL/PSWFL.pdf
    Regards,
    Raj.

  • Duration of Implementation Project and Support Project & No. staff in eachj

    Hi
    What is the time duration of an Implementation Project and Support Project?
    What are the number of staff fworking for these projects?
    Can any one of u throw light further
    Regards
    Sunitha

    Hi Sunita,
    Implementation
    Duration of the project depends upon teh project size.
    if it is a small indian company (500 crores) it should take between 5-7 months
    team required: each consultant for each module depending on scope(Apprx:-2 abaper, 1 MM,1 SD, 1 FI, 1 CO and 1 for PP)
    Support Project:
    Duaration of support project will be 1,2, 5 years depending upon the agreement betwween company and client.
    Best Regards
    Ashish Jain
    Pls assign points as a way to say thanks.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Multitenant application authentication in SharePoint Online (O365)

    I am able to use OAuth2 to authenticate using the mechanism described here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn645542.aspx - my intention is to allow my 3rd party WebApp to allow users to grant access to their SharePoint content via Azur

  • Mv replication between Oracle 10g standared edition one and enterpriseedit

    i have one ee 10g and 30 se-1 mv sites ,i have to replicate more than 100 tables from aabout 30 sites which have standared edition one to master site(enterprise edition0 . 1. Is it possible if yes then how? 2. is it will be 2 way updatable changes on

  • Error in Zreport while upgrading from 46C to ECC 6

    Hello Experts, I am facing problems in 1 Zreport while i have upgraded that report from 4.6C to ECC 6. Dump is reported while running the program. Error is : "Access non-existent storage area." error is coming @ line :  ADD <f1> THEN <f2> UNTIL <f3>

  • What is the host string value?Oracle8 Personal

    What is the value for the host string field in the log-in dialog box for SQL Plus. I do know my username and password, what do I enter into the hoststring.This is for Oracle8 Personal Ed. on Ms 2000 Platform.

  • Filemaker 7 to Address Book 3.1.2 ?

    Hello, I am trying to import records from Filemaker 7 to Address Book 3.1.2 . It does not seem possible and I am seeking advice. I am soon upgrading to an intel Mac, however my aim is to not use Filemaker anymore, so I figured if I could get all my r