HT5035 When you have a positive gift card credit balance, are purchases automatically charged to the gift card balance rather than your credit card?

When you have a positive gift card balance, are purchases charged to the gift card first until the balance is exhausted before your credit card is charged?

Yes, your account's balance should be used first before any charges are applied to your credit card.

Similar Messages

  • Keeping main menu widget highlighted when you have all pages below this open. Its only staying highlighted for the main page

    I have a main menu widget that says 'Services' then below that a group of pages thats relate to this - I want the word 'Services' to stay highlighted when Im on each page but it only is for the main one.

    This is the default behavior as the one which is active will only be highlighted. Menu item is linked with page url , so if the page url is used in browser then active state will highlight that menu item.
    Thanks,
    Sanjit

  • HT5035 Can you have an iTunes gift card and a credit card on the same iTunes account?

    I still have money left on my iTunes gift card, but not enough for a purchase. So I was wondering if I add a credit card to my account, when I make a purchase will it use the rest of the money from my gift card and then charge from my credit card, or would it merely cancel out the gift card and replace it with my credit card?

    Yes, it will, unless you make a purchase which can't be done with a gift card, in which case the balance will remain and the entire purchase be charged to the credit card.
    (66706)

  • HT201209 Once you redeem a gift card are purchases automatically deducted from gift card or do you have to select something when you download ?

    Once you redeem a gift card are purchases automatically deducted from gift card or do you have to select something when you download ?

    It'll be automatic unless there's a problem on the iTunes Store servers or you're making a purchase which can't be paid for with iTunes Store credit, such as another gift card.
    (99553)

  • When we purchase from iTunes the balance is not coming off of the gift cards. We have family sharing on but when my kids purchase songs they are credited to our credit card and not the gift card that is already in their account. What's wrong?

    When we purchase from iTunes the balance is not coming off of the gift cards. We have family sharing on but when my kids purchase songs they are credited to our credit card and not the gift card that is already in their account. What's wrong?

    Hi Angela1313,
    I see that you have a question about using gift cards with Family Sharing. Here is an article with some information that my be pertinent to this issue:
    iTunes Gift balances
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5035
    Learn more
    Learn how to send an iTunes Gift or redeem iTunes Gift Cards and content codes. If you're using Family Sharing, the credit you redeem will only be available to you. iTunes Store credit on your account isn't shared with other family members.
    Thanks for using the Apple Support Communities!
    Cheers,
    Braden

  • When you have iTunes money and you submit an in app purchase. Does it charge on your credit card?

    When you have iTunes money and you submit an in app purchase. Does it charge on your credit card?

    Normally the credit is used up first before the system falls back to a credit card to cover a balanced not covered completely by the credit on the account.

  • Actually i have a apple account without credit card in usa i have just got a itunes gift card from an application so can i redeeme the gift card without credit card????

    actually i have a apple account without credit card in usa i have just got a itunes gift card from an application so can i redeeme the gift card without credit card????

    Yes you can redeem the card if it is a U.S. gift card, you have a U.S. based iTunes account and if you are using the U.S. stores on the iPad.
    On the iPad - Swipe to the bottom of the screen in the App Store or in iTunes and tap on Redeem. If you are using iTunes on your computer, you should see Redeem under Quick Links (i think that is where you will see it) after you sign into the store.

  • When you have 1 itunes library.. and 2 ipods.. different names.. how can you share the same library???

    When you have 1 itunes library.. and 2 ipods.. different names.. how can you share the same library???  All of the songs that were put on there from a CD will sync, but the songs that were purchased.. "cannot be found"   How can we merge them?? or how can we share all songs.. purchased or not!

    When you have 1 itunes library.. and 2 ipods.. different names.. how can you share the same library???  All of the songs that were put on there from a CD will sync, but the songs that were purchased.. "cannot be found"   How can we merge them?? or how can we share all songs.. purchased or not!

  • How do I resolve this error message? The iPhoto library is on a locked volume.  Reopen iPhoto when you have read/write access, or reopen iPhoto with the Option key held down to choose another library.

    How do I resolve this error message? The iPhoto library is on a locked volume.  Reopen iPhoto when you have read/write access, or reopen iPhoto with the Option key held down to choose another library.

    Hi j,
    I don't know if this will work, but I'd try logging in to an admin account, going to your main library (not user library), opening it, opening Application Support, selecting iPhoto, hold down the command key and press i, click on the lock in the lower left, entering the password and making sure you have Read & Write privileges for System and Admin.

  • I did all the steps to restore my password when you have never synched to a computer before.  I got to step 4 where my ipod told me to connect to itunes but itunes did not respond. what do I do now?

    I am trying to restore my password.  I followed the steps for doing so when you have never synched the ipod to your computer. I got so far as the 4th step when my ipod told me to connect to itunes.  The last step is itunes is suppose alert me that it senses a device going through recovery mode.  It never did that.  I also just downloaded the latest itunes so what do I do now?  Im only 10 and find this really confusing.  But Im trying

    Place the iPod in recovery mode and restore via iTunes on your computer. For recovery mode see:
    iPhone and iPod touch: Unable to update or restore

  • HT201359 When you have been charged twice for same item, how do you get your money back?

    When you have been charged twice for same item, how do you get your money back?

    Morning Domangere,
    Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
    Following this article refund will be an option.
    For more information on this, take a look at this article:
    How to report an issue with your iTunes Store, App Store, Mac App Store, or iBookstore purchase
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1933
    Best of luck,
    Mario

  • What index types do you suggest when you have...

    If you have tables A, B, C and they are all partitioned range by created_date where that is a timestamp
    If nearly all queries can only specify created_date on C only because the B's that belong to A and the C's that belong to B can all be in different partitions relative to their children. So if you have weekly partitions for A, B, C the C's the belong to B and the B's the belong to A can be in different weeks partitions. Now A, B and C all use surrogate keys and there's an index on all of them. You have one to many b/w A->B and one to many b/w B->C where any C has a 1 B parent and that B parent can have one and only one A parent.
    When doing the join you end up doing something like
    select * from A, B, C
    where A.a_id = B.a_id
    and B.b_id = C.b_id
    and C.created_date >sysdate - 1
    The problem is that the indexes on A and B are all global non partitioned as are the indexes on C
    Right now we get partition elimination on C on a good day but when the optimizer decides go to A first we get none. Whenever the optimizer goes to A it often does partition range all scans because there is no partition key on A or B
    used in the query.
    How can we get the query plan to reliably use C first so that partition elimination is always guaranteed.
    Currently our thinking is to use /*+ ORDERED */ where the from is C, B, A
    Unfortunately the programs cannot introduce bind variables so where we can use Baselines to manage the plan for a given sql_id the only way we can do this is to use CURSOR_SHARING=force via login trigger on their session. This forces the
    introduction of bind variables in to the query but Their queries are formed dynamically from a GUI screen that optionally can provide different parameters. So not only do you have N's items in an IN clause to worry about you also have other optional parameters that can show up in the query depending on whether they are used or not.
    Q. Has anybody solved this problem by wrapping the query in a procedure so that you can pin the plan to the procedure where all that differs in the procedure is how the arguments are specified? This seems tedius to me because the procedure would have to take comma separate lists of values whenever you want to pass the values to be used in an IN clause.
    Only if you wrap a query that can have optional parameters and N values for any parameter can you manage the plan for that procedure thru a baseline otherwise you simply end up with too many plans to manage because of the different combinations of the size of the IN clauses and the optional parameters that can be specified.
    When joining b/w A, B, C etc what indexes should be partitioned?
    The typical query uses column values on A to limit the C's associated with the B's that are associated with the A's that match those columns. Those fields on A have global indexes so often when the plan is one where it starts at A first and works it's way down it has to consider far too many rows from A that are unrelated to the eventual partition narrowed to from the C.created_date predicate.
    Edited by: steffi on Mar 8, 2011 8:56 PM
    Edited by: steffi on Mar 8, 2011 8:57 PM
    Edited by: steffi on Mar 8, 2011 8:58 PM

    Dear Steffi,
    The problem is that the indexes on A and B are all global non partitioned as are the indexes on CWhy are you saying that this is a problem?
    What are the definition of your primary index on A, B, and C?
    You can eventually add the partition key (created_date) to those primary keys and hence locally partition their corresponding PK indexes
    As far as you wrote that there is no relation ship between A.created_date, B.created_date a and C.created_date, then I beleive you can't benefit from the partition wise join because in such case you need to join A,B and C on the same partition key which is created_date
    Currently our thinking is to use /*+ ORDERED */ where the from is C, B, AUsing /*+ ORDERED */ is not a guarantee that the Oracle Optimiser will obey this hint.
    Use the hint /*+ Leading(C) */ instaedYou know that when you wrap your query into a static PL/SQL procedure you don't have to care then about the use bind variable. It will be used;
    that is how static PL/SQL wroks. But when you are using dynamic sql into this PL/SQL procedure you need in this case to take care about using bind variable.
    The auto-binding trick which is represented by the cursor_sharing=force (or similar) is not highly recommended as far as there exist side effects like the one that cames to my mind now which is when you have function based indexes based on litteral (for example a function based index like substr(a,2,4)) will be rewritten, when cursor_sharing is set to force, to be substr(a, :SYS_B0, :SYS_B1) which will not mach your original query and will not use the function based index anymore
    Best Regards
    Mohamed Houri

  • For me, a time capsule is even safe when you have whatter damage op fire in your house. Am I wrong or is it just an additional HD like there are so maney with the only advantage that it goes automatically via your wifi for apple devices?

    For me, a time capsule is even safe when you have whatter damage op fire in your house. Am I wrong or is it just an additional HD like there are so maney with the only advantage that it goes automatically via your wifi for apple devices?

    Jloe,
    As I have posted before, You, and others having issues with Verizon would be much better off if you complained to the FCC and FTC as well as your Senators and Congressmen.  We, as individuals, have such small voices - use them where they might do the most good.
    Also, don't assume that Verizon doesn't monitor these postings, they actively do & sometimes contact those that post complaints.
    Sorry for your problems.  GC

  • I bought a redeem card and it wont work is says that the gift certificate or prepaid card you entered has not been properly activated

    I bought a redeem card and it wont work is says that the gift certificate or prepaid card you entered has not been properly activated

    You will need to contact the iTunes Store.

  • XML DB when you have a lot of XSDs....

    My client has a data situation where we have a lot of XSD schemas (and multiple versions of each XSD) which describe data that needs to be loaded.
    If I wanted to use schema-based / structured-storage....Can the same xmltype column be mapped to multiple XSDs? Or would I have to create a different Oracle xmltype column for every unique XSD that I have?
    We have approximately 100 different XSD schemas and up to 7 versions of each schema. If I have to map each xmltype column to a unique schema, then that would require up to 700 different xmltype columns.
    Is there a better way?

    From reading the documentation "XML DB Developer Guide" (chap 6), it depends on the storage type you assign your schema when you register it. By defaults, it's Object-Relational which must use the same schema for all rows of a XMLType table or column, but if you use Binary XML storage, and specify ANYSCHEMA, then in theory you can have rows using different schemas, as long as the schemas as registered with XML DB. But apparently, you then can't restrict which set of schemas to use, any document confirming to any registered schema can be inserted. Maybe a restriction on which subset of schemas are "valid" can be implemented via triggers, but I don't know.
    Note that I "just" read this in the doc. I have no practical experience with this yet. --DD                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Maybe you are looking for