HtmlExporter missing strikethrough condition

Hi there,
I had discover a bug(?) or unintended feature - able to do strikethrough on TextFlow but when use TextConverter to convert to html tag. The <S></S> tag is missing. After some digging through the sdk code and found out HtmlExporter doesn't handle the condition of strikethrough. My current sdk version 4.0.0.14159 (come with flex builder 4)
Tried version 4.1.0.14756, it seems to be the same.
Search through the change log - couldn't find anything related to this on latest build.
Question about this,
Is it a bug? or is it intended? If it is intended, will I get any similar feature in the future build?
Unrelated question,
All the html tag generate by the HtmlExporter are deprecated in html 4. Is there any plan to move forward to use CSS?
I can try to hack around to get it to work for my environment but I just don't want to make a lot of changes if there is new sdk that fix it in the future. Please let me know what I can do with this.
Cheers

After diving into the docs and the code it becomes clear that TLF wasn't build with the goal of becoming a standards compliant HTML/CSS renderer. I think it's safe te assume that this will stay that way for at least a few years.
The importers/exporters are somewhat useful but even if you extend them they only provide a piece of the puzzle, e.g. in CSS you often use unit types that are relative to some other (already earlier) computed value. TLF wouldn't understand those unit type nor would it know what to do with it, e.g. em values or gr (grid) units and it doesn't give the developer a hook/event to solve those custom computings before using them. If you are happy to extend a lot of related classes and don't shy a way from some hackerish stuff then there are options to get the results you want but those require a lot of time and will probably break with the next TLF release. And of course you would still want to leverage the TLF SWZ (the TLF lib ending up in your users Flash Player cache) with a minimum extra download for your extensions.
So that doesn't mean that TLF can't be used as the basis of a more HTML/CSS standards compliant renderer/editor but I think it's most likely that these kind of efforts will come from third party developers either from the open source community (e.g. tlfx) or from commercial parties.

Similar Messages

PRICING - Condition record is missing in Condition Type BW51

Hi Folks.
After implementing SAP Note #815720 and #916003, regarding Withholding Tax Accumulation (Brazil localization), I got a gap.
The BW51 Condition (WHT Acc. Flag - Access Sequence BRWT) misses all conditions on its access sequence.
Taking a look at A346 table I realized that it didn't get records migrated from J_1BTXWITHV.
Consequentely, it didn't get activated and its subtotal condition (2) didn't work as well.
I migrated TAX TABLES to CONDITIONS on J1BTAX, however my records are not in A346 linked with BW51.
May you give a tip? Why can't I see BW51 on A346 even migrating J_1BTXWITHV?
Thank you very much.
Leandro

Hi Leandro,
The condition is related with flag accumulation dynamic tables. Therefore, if in the table J_1BTXWITH, for instance, the flag (Origem Base de Cálculo) the condition BW51 is activated and it start to has e value 100%.
                                                                                Please, make the follow configuration as well:
                                                                                ->V/06
1- BCOZ, BCSZ, BGEZ, BIRZ e BPSZ:
Cond. class: D (Impostos)
Calculat.type: A (Percentual)
Cond.category: D (Imposto)
Access Seq.: IBRX
Manual entries: D (Processamento manual impossível)
Item condition: X
RefConType: IBRX
2-BXWA
Cond. class   D Taxes
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category D Tax
Access seq.   DIBR
RefConType    DWHT
RefApplicatio V
3-BXWT
Cond. class   D Taxes
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category: D (Imposto)
Access Seq.: IBRX
Manual entries: D
Item condition: X
RefConType: IBRX
I hope it can be helpful.
Regards
Ruy Castro

Provision account key missing for condition type FRA1 in schema ZIMPOR

Hi,
While maintaining the condition value in PO, the below message displayed.
"Provision account key missing for condition type FRA1 in schema ZIMPOR"
Thanks and regards
Murugesan

Go to
Spro>MM>Pur>Conditions>Define Price Determination Process>Define Calculation Schema
here select ZIMP and click control data
in that maintain "Account key" for FRA1 cond type in the Account key Column..
(Second column from right side)

Provision account key missing for condition type ZPFV in schema ZUELOC

Hi
We have defined the condition type ZPFV for freight value & mentioning the same while creating po and in past we had prepared so many po by using this.
we hv not change any thing & today we are getting message " Provision account key missing for condition type ZPFV in schema ZUELOC"
What to do???????
Thanks
Ketan Vala

hi..
If the accrual is ticked in condition type in M/06, it should have an account key assigned to the condition type in the pricing procedure in M/08.
Go to your contion type ZPFV and check whether you have checked Accrual or not..
then go to ur pricing procedure ZUELOC and check the last two colums for your condito type i.e. Account Key and Accrual Key.
Maintain these..
try this if it works.
Thanks...

Provision account key missing for condition type FRB1 in schema

Provision account key missing for condition type FRB1 in schema is the error coming while i enter freight value at PO
how to set this
krishna

Hi Krishna,
Go to Pricing procedure using M/08 , here against the Freight condition type ( FB1), enter the accrual key ( ex. FRE)and account key ( ex. FR1 or FR2).
After saving to the customizing request, again create the PO.
Thanks & Regards,
Amjad

Report to check materials list with missing pricing conditions

Hi,
I have two levels in the BOM. Sales material in the top and purchase material in the bottom. I create VK11 pricing (condition type: XP00) for SALES ORG/ MATERIAL and SALES ORG/ MATERIAL/ CUSTOMER level for both materials. Is there any standard SAP report to display materials I missed to enter pricing conditions.
Thanks,
Sam

Dear Sam
I dont know there is such report which fulfills your requirement. but i suggest you to run V/LD and select Material Prices at 15. Give sales organization, distribution channel, condition type and material range from and to. For example i just executed report with
Sales organization        1000
Distribution Channel       60
Material                          1900000         1999999
Condition                        PR00
The system will show you the materials for which you have maintained condition record. Export this report to excel and use VLOOKUP for your requirement.
Update your response.

Invoice List: Missing Pricing Condition

Hi,
We are trying to implement invoice list because of the different sold-to party but same payer requirement. we have configured all the requirements listed
Prerequisites
You can only process invoice lists if the following prerequisite data is defined by your system administrator in Customizing for Sales:
    Condition type RL00 (factoring discount) must be maintained and, if required, also the condition type MW15.
    An invoice list type must be assigned to each billing type that you want to process in invoice lists. The standard version of the SAP R/3 System includes two types of invoice lists: LR for invoices and debit memos, LG for credit memos.
    Copying requirements must be defined (for example, the payer, terms of payment and other fields that must be identical in the documents to be included in the invoice list)
In addition, before you process an invoice list, you must maintain the following master data:
    A customer calendar must be defined, specifying the time intervals or dates on which invoice lists are to be processed.
    The customer calendar must be entered in the Billing Sales Area view of the customer master record.
    Pricing condition records for the condition type RL00 and, if necessary, (e.g. in Germany) the condition type MW15 must be maintained.
    Output condition records for condition types LR00 and RD01 must be created.
It successfully creates the invoice list now with net value, but, the pricing condition is missing.
What might have been the problem?
Thanks in advance for your help...

Hi,
Have you maintained the pricing condition record for RL00? Also can you please explain what have you maintained in copy control? If possible, please share the screenshot.
Thanks,
Jaydip

IDoc Message Structure Missing from Condition Editor - SWCV Dependency

Hi All,
I have an issue whereby I am missing the Message Structure in the Condition Editor Dialog while doing Receiver determination. I have seen others posts with the issue but none of the solutions seem to apply to me. My config:
I have a SWCV called MY_SAP_BASIS, which is defined in the SLD with SAP BASIS as prereq. I import this SWCV into IR and build some objects. I wish to use an IDoc, so I import it into SAP BASIS, and it appears under my SWCV (MY_SAP_BASIS) in the "Basis Objects" section, but not directly under "Imported Objects" - as I would expect because of the relationship created in the SLD.
My issue comes when I try to create a Rec. Determination. I want to use the condition editor, for multiple receivers, but when I click on the button to bring that up, first I get the error "Message interface does not exist in any software components installed on this business system", then when I try to use the Structure of the IDoc for an XPath, the structure browser is empty.
I can't see why this would be. If I look in the SLD, and look at the Business System in question, it lists MY_SAP_BASIS and SAP BASIS as being installed.
Also, when I do a "Where used" in IR on that IDoc, using my own SWCV and SAP BASIS, I get the same list. I have also checked the GUID's between the SLD and IR, and they are identical (except fpr hyphens in the display, which I am assuming don't matter).
Anyone have any ideas? I assume that if I import the IDocs directly in MY_SAP_ERP, I will be able to solve this. But I would rather the Software Dependency worked!
Many thanks.

Jai/Michal,
Many thanks for your replies. But unfortunately I had already checked this and I don't think it is the issue. My first message probably wan't as clear as it should have been: I have a Product "MY_SAP_BASIS" - this has one SWCV under it, also called "MY_SAP_BASIS". This SWCV has a dependency on "SAP BASIS 4.6c". Now, on the Technical and Business systems involved, the Product "MY_SAP_BASIS" is installed. This, as you would expect from the dependency, brings across the "MY_SAP_BASIS" SWCV and the "SAP BASIS 4.6c" SWCV, so they are both installed on the technical system . So I don't know what else I should be adding? Unless my understanding of Software dependencies is incorrect, I think my config looks right in the SLD. The SWCV under which the IDoc imports are done is "SAP BASIS 4.6c", and this is installed on both the technical and business system. The only difference is that it gets there through a software dependency, and is not added "directly". In IR I can see the imported objects under the "MY_SAP_BASIS" SWCV - in the "Basis Objects" section.
Is there anything else anyone can suggest?

Condition class and calculation type missing for conditions downloaded from

Hi All,
I have downloaded all the condition types from R/3 using dnl custcndall
I have even downloaded the following using r3as
dnl_cust_cnd
dnl_cust_prc
dnl_cust_price
But I have noticed that for the downloaded condition types, condition class and calculation types are missing. Please suggest.

I have faced the same issue recently.
The solution is in adapter object DNL_CUST_CNDALL for table T685 and other tables for T685 in that objet put the filters for condition type
for ex: KSCHL eq PR00
This sure will work.
But you have to set this filter for all tables T685*
Thanks
Sarabjeet

Missing few Condition types in sales order

Dear Experts
I have come across an issue in the sales order. And FYI, no configuration change has happened recently. And also, this issue has happened in few sales order only.
OVKK: Pricing Procedure Determination
*S.Org SN12
Dist.chan DM
Division V1
Doc.pricing. proc A
Customer.prici proced 6
Pricing procedure ZSALES
And ZSALES pricing procedure is having 5 condition types to update in sales order. But in few sales order, 2 of the condition types are missing in sales order.
So, I have checked in customer master for customer pric. procedure and it is maintained as 6 and Doc.pricing procedure is also maintained as A as maintained in OVKK.
And the sales order too have been created for the respective order type having doc pricing prcoed as A and for the sales area maintained in OVKK.
I find this issue as strange. Can any one of you help me out to solve this issue as it is very urgent.
Thank you very much.
Regards
Rajesh
Edited by: RajeshR01 on Feb 14, 2012 2:45 PM

Hello Rajesh,
1. Am entering material in line item and clicking enter button
and can able to see all the 5 condition types in the condition tab.
But when I delete material in the line item manually, without clicking
the icon 'Delete icon' and again entering the material
and pressing 'Enter' button. When I am going to condition tab this
time, as mentioned earlier 2 condition types only missing (Say Ex
ZABC and ZXYZ) and able to save sales order normally.
How to overcome this?
As per SAP standard, when you perform ANALYSIS in the material line item CONDITION tab for a Sales Order, all the CONDITION types related to the Pricing procedure will be reflected. Here you will find information whether any condition type got suppressed and why it got suppressed...If any pricing routines are deactivating any condition type, you will get the information in this Analysis tab.
When you say that the condition types are not visible in the Analysis button, it is making me perplexed...
As per latest observation, the condition types are disappering after DELETE operation is done signify that the database is not getting refreshed instantly...
Can you tell me whether you are conducting this activity at IDES sandbox or at Client Server ? If this problem is detected at Client server, has the client raised any questions ???
Regards,
Sarthak

Entries missing for Condition tables in TADIR

Hi,
I have downloaded certain pricing condition tables from ECC (customizing download). They got generated successfully and were visible as 'Active' in SPRO and ABAP Dictionary (SE11).
When I ran the customizing download again, all the tables had become 'Inactive' in SPRO>Customer Relationship Management>Basic Functions>Pricing>Define Settings for Pricing--> Create Condition Tables.
But at the same time, these tables are appearing as 'Active' in SE11 and condition records are also flowing for them from ECC to CRM.
Having checked the log in Transaction SLG1, there are visibly few errors stating 'Entry not found in TADIR' for some condition tables.
Any pointers to identify the source/cause of this error or how to resolve the same?
Thanks & Regards,
Vartika

Hi Vartika,
The note 457711 will be helpful for you.
Generally these errors on TADIR coversion will not cause any problems on your conditions download..These errors can be ignored.
Please check for inconsistencies between R/3 ad CRM using the note 664815 and correct them. There are reports attached to it for 4 diferent cases.
Thanks
Abishek
Edited by: Abishek Kumar Thiagarajan on Jun 11, 2009 8:58 AM

Missing "End Condition" pull down under Media Inspector

I am creating a DVD menu and wanted to loop an 8 second clip into a 20 second DVD menu.
When I go to the Media Inspector I see all the other parameters: Alpha Type, Invert Alpha, Pixel Aspect Ratio, Field Dominance, Frame Rate. But no "End Condition" nor "reverse". It's as if I needed to pull them section down to reveal them, but I can't seem to find a way to do this. It is very odd and I have already deleted the preferences and restarted Motion to no avail.
Anyone ever had this odd behavior? Thanks for any input!
Doug

It's not there. You need to select the layer in the Layers tab, then go to the bottom of the Properties tab in the Inspector and open the Timing properties. This was changed from M2 to M3.

Update SO after creating missing condition record

Hi Gurus,
I was getting error message that missing MWST condition in Order, then I investigated and created missing condition record in VK11. Now I would like to update the Sales order and tried update tab on condition but invain.
Initially the document was created on 17.11.2008 and today condition record was created 18.11.2008.
Kindly help me in resolving this.
Thanks
Bawa

Dear Bawa,
While creating Condition Record "MWST" in VK11/ 12;
What were the Dates maintained in Fields:
1. Valid From (try with back-date maintenance)
2. Valid To (Maintain as 31.12.9999)
Once done, try to Update with "G - Copy pricing elements unchanged and redetermine taxes", in Sales Order.
Best Regards,
Amit

Mandatory condition ZR00 is missing

Hi,
When the user is creating an order he is getting Mandatory condition ZR00 is missing.But Condition record is there.I have checked it.Does any one has answer for this,This is very critical.
Regards
Ram Pedarla

Hi Aram,
please check these things,
01. is the sales doc is before or after the date maintained in condistion record.
02. Are you sure about the table for which you have maintained the condition record. the table contains the fields and gives the key combination. so if key combination maintained in your condition record is different it can't determine the data.
03. check whether you hav ny routine is assigned with and it is not getting its requiremnt.
04. please check whther your table is getting updated or not after saving your condition records.
05. if you are not getting the solution then check in analysis tell us what it sayes.

Error while adding conditions in Imports PO

Dear Sir,
We want add Freight charges and Custom Clearing Charges in Imports PO as Misc. Charges in condition ZMIS.
But we try to add these as 3 % it gives following error
Provision account key missing for condition type ZMIS in schema ZHILI1
Message no. ME172
Please suggest me the solution.
Thanks & Regards
Vishal

Solved using M/06 M/08

HtmlExporter missing strikethrough condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for